FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA
@THECALIFORNIAAGGIE
SERVING THE UC DAVIS CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY SINCE 1915
THE CALIFORNIA AGGIE
THEAGGIE.ORG
@CALIFORNIAAGGIE
@CALIFORNIAAGGIE
VOLUME 139, ISSUE 20 | THURSDAY, APRIL 1, 2021
STUDENT EMPLOYEES ELIGIBLE FOR COVID-19 VACCINE, LOW AVAILABILITY AT UC DAVIS CLINIC Though approximately 7,500 student workers are now eligible for the COVID-19 vaccine, few students have received their doses on campus due to low supply BY KATHLEEN QUINN campus@theaggie.org On March 1, just over 7,500 student employees at UC Davis became eligible for the vaccine under the state’s “education and childcare” category. BreAnda Northcutt, the communications director for finance, operations and administration, has been working with the Campus Ready communications team since it launched around June last year. “Pretty quickly the county and state opened up to all education and childcare workers as frontline employees, and that just basically flattened all the tiers that had originally been set up for UC Davis employees,” Northcutt said. Cindy Schorzman, the medical director of Student Health and Counseling Services, said that they have a consistent and enthusiastic response for the vaccine clinic at the ARC, but supply has been the main concern. “Vaccine supply remains the limiting factor in the number of doses that we can give,” Schorzman said via email. Schorzman said the clinic is able to accommodate between 140-350 people per day depending on the availability of doses. Nathalie Moriarty is a first-year Ph.D. candidate in psychology and a graduate student researcher eligible under the ‘education and childcare’ tier. She received her first dose on March 8 and received her second on March 29. Moriarty got her vaccine at California Northstate University College of Pharmacy in Elk Grove, California, which is about a 30 to 40 minute drive from Davis. “I had been checking [vaccine appointment websites] periodically,” Moriarty said. “Somebody in my cohort or somebody in my lab would say, ‘Hey I got an appointment, here’s the link,’ and by the time we opened the link, they’d be full.” Northcutt said that on top of the sudden increase in eligibility, the university has switched
to using the state’s scheduling system My Turn as part of a state requirement to continue receiving doses of the vaccine. This means that the clinic that once served largely UC Davis employees is now open to the public to book appointments. “The general sentiment is there is a greater demand than we have the supply for,” Northcutt said. Michelle Andrews, a second-year environmental science and management major, was eligible as a student assistant who works currently on the UC Davis campus. “I actually spent almost about two or three weeks checking both the school appointment site and the county appointment site multiple times a day to see if there were any appointments,” Andrews said. “It took about two to three weeks to get one through the county.” Isabella Beristain, a third-year international relations and anthropology double-major, qualified for the vaccine as a writing intern. “We knew that the best time to look for appointments was midnight to 6 a.m.,” Beristain said. “For me, it was luckily very easy, but I know for lots of other people it’s pretty hard to find vaccine appointments.” Northcutt said she has been encouraging eligible people to get the vaccine wherever they can and notes that the clinic may expand once more doses of the vaccine become available. UC Davis’ clinic has the capacity to store all three of the currently FDA-approved vaccines: Moderna, Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson. Like many clinics, they provide whatever vaccine is available at the time. “We administer whatever we have,” Northcutt said. Moriarty said she waited until other graduate students that she knew on campus had gotten the vaccine before she started looking for herself. “At one point, I received a link where the person who sent it to me said, ‘Hey, they’re not checking eligibility requirements,’ and that didn’t feel right to me at all.”
REQUIREMENT FOR PROFESSORS TO GIVE END-OF-QUARTER EXAMS WAIVED AGAIN FOR SPRING QUARTER 2021 Students will also have up until the last day of instruction to take a class pass/no pass
Mrak Hall at UC Davis during Winter Quarter 2020. (Quinn Spooner / Aggie) BY REBECCA BIHN-WALLACE campus@theaggie.org The requirement for professors to give end-of-quarter exams has been waived again for Spring Quarter 2021, according to Dr. Richard Tucker, the chair of the UC Davis division of the Academic Senate. Professors must notify students about whether they plan to give a final exam by the end of the first week of their respective courses. When contacted by The Aggie, Chancellor Gary May referred inquiries about the university’s current exam policies to Tucker. “Exam policy is really the purview of the Academic Senate rather than the administration,” May said via email. Tucker said that the Academic Senate hadn’t yet determined whether the same policy will be applicable for instruction in Fall Quarter 2021, although in-person classes have been tentatively scheduled for that time due to the increased availability of COVID-19 vaccines. “We will determine these [policies] once we’re closer to fall and have more confirmed details about campus operating status,” he said, referring to the UC Davis Academic Senate’s website for further details. Exam policies have been frequently adjusted throughout the previous year due to pandemic regulations and changing social conditions in the U.S.. In-person final exams for Winter Quarter 2020 were previously canceled last March due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic as universities nationwide prepared to go online and the UC Davis campus was eventually closed for in-person instruction. In June 2020, following the police killing of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man, the Academic Senate at UC Davis allowed faculty to determine students’ grades based on their work up to the last day of instruction in Spring Quarter, instead of relying on their exams for final grades. Professors were also encouraged to be more lenient with pass/no pass grading and incompletes, a policy which has carried into Spring Quarter 2021. Accordingly, students have up until the last day of instruction to decide whether they want to take a class pass/no pass instead of for a letter grade. No more than one-third of courses may be taken as such, however. The decision to require or cancel exams also remains at the discretion of professors, according to current exam policy guidelines.
The Activities and Recreation Center at UC Davis during Fall Quarter 2020. (Quinn Spooner / Aggie) Chancellor Gary May said in an email on March 5 that employees can use their UCPath login to print out proof of employment to show to vaccine clinics when asked. Some of the first groups in Tier 1 were higherrisk agricultural workers, which Northcutt said the communications team made a grassroots effort to reach out to. The state’s tiered system has evolved rapidly, which has made keeping the UC Davis Campus Ready page up to date a constant challenge. “So we put on information about the vaccine clinic opening,” Northcutt said. “Literally within hours, it changed from 75 plus to 65 plus.” California Governor Gavin Newsome announced that the vaccine will be open to all adults 50 and over, regardless of other risk factors on April 1, as he anticipates an increase in vaccine supply. Northcutt said she often gets questions about whether people who are vaccinated can go back to
‘normal.’ At least for the time being, she said, the 6 ft social distancing measures, mask-wearing and testing that has become a normal part of life on campus for UC Davis will continue. “There’s just so much that’s unknown about how the vaccine will protect other people,” Northcutt said. Though Moriarty’s personal risk is low, she said she doesn’t plan on making a lot of lifestyle changes after her second dose. “I really don’t want to, even though I would be safe, I really don’t want to risk contaminating anybody else,” Moriarty said. Andrews said she has hated shots ever since she was a little, but she was excited to get her vaccine. “I live at home so it was awesome to know that I could protect my family by doing this,” Andrews said. “As soon as the pandemic started out I was counting down the days until I could get the vaccine.”
CITY OF DAVIS PASSES RESOLUTION CONDEMNING ANTI-ASIAN VIOLENCE UC Davis professor explains that local resolutions express solidarity BY RACHEL SHEY city@theaggie.org After Yolo County passed a resolution on Feb. 23 condemning anti-Asian violence, the Davis City Council adopted a similar resolution on March 16. Davis City Councilmember Dan Carson explained that the resolution was suggested by community member Lisa Yep Salinas, who also suggested the Yolo County resolution. “There is a national group I know that has been reaching out all across the country, but on a personal level, I became aware of the concern from Lisa Yep Salinas,” Carson said. “She had been posting on Facebook about her own personal experiences in the county in grocery stores and situations that she found very disturbing, uncomfortable and clearly racist.” The existence of the resolution itself, despite not appearing to establish any actionable goals, is important in curbing anti-Asian violence, UC Davis Professor of Asian American Studies Richard S. Kim explained. “Words do matter, and I think the next steps going forward is involvement and support of every level of government: at the local level, such as Davis, at the state level and at the national level,” Kim said. “In conjunction, we need a combination of educational and civil and community action to create more opportunities for allied individuals and groups to come together and stand strong together, rather than apart or pitted against each other. Resolutions are a step towards that.” Kim elaborated that anti-Asian violence is nothing new in American history, and that such violence can tend to have the effect of uniting the disparate ethnicities that KATHERINE FRANKS / AGGIE
constitute the Asian racial group. “Anti-Asian violence has been perpetual and continual for many, many, many years, that led to institutionalized laws that once sought to restrict Asian immigration to the U.S., that prevented Asians from becoming citizens until 1952,” Kim said. “This is rooted in a long history. This is not just something that’s new and unique to what’s happening now. All Asians of different ethnicities, different classes and generations are seeing that this hate is targeting them equally—that no one’s making distinctions between who’s Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese—but that this is a larger anti-Asian hatred, and that this can happen to any one of them. In many ways, this is enforcing that notion of an Asian American identity.” Kim also stressed that not all Asians espouse the same views. “That’s the misnomer that all Asians think alike in these racial issues,” Kim said. “There’s great diversity of thought within the Asian American community, and we don’t all react in the same way to these sorts of issues. The term Asian American was coined coming out of the social movements of the 1960s—not just the civil rights movement, the black power movement. It is rooted in solidarity with each other and with other racial groups as well.” This resolution is not the end of the city’s efforts to combat racism, according to Carson. He added that the city also hopes to increase staff diversity in order to reduce racial bias. “I think one of the most effective ways to combat this kind of racial bias is to find and add to our city commissions very good and talented people who also happen to be of Asian and Pacific Islander descent,” Carson said.