FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA
@THECALIFORNIAAGGIE
SERVING THE UC DAVIS CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY SINCE 1915
THE CALIFORNIA AGGIE
@CALIFORNIAAGGIE
@CALIFORNIAAGGIE
VOLUME 138, ISSUE 3 | THURSDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2019
THEAGGIE.ORG
GLOBAL CLIMATE STRIKES PICK UP MOMENTUM IN DAVIS Youth in Davis organizes city-wide climate strike JU STIN H A N / AG GIE A RIA N A GREEN / AGG IE
CITY OF DAVIS TO TRANSITION TO DISTRICT-BASED ELECTION SYSTEM Under threat of lawsuit, City of Davis revamps council member elections, school districts BY TI M LALONDE city@theaggie.org
Activists hold up signs in front of the Los Angeles City Hall during a climate march on Sept. 20, 2019.
BY TAYLO R M A RT INE Z city@theaggie.org High school students, their families and the community at large organized a climate strike in Davis on Sept. 20 as part of a wider range of global climate strikes that started to gain traction once Greta Thunberg, a young climate activist, initiated a call to action to combat climate change. The strike in Davis began at the public library and the group then headed to Central Park. Amber Crenna-Armstrong, a senior at Davis High School, was inspired by Thunberg to organize this climate strike. “I learned about the strikes going on from Greta Thunberg’s Instagram page and thought it was a perfect opportunity for Davis to have a strike of its own,” Crenna-Armstrong said. “My mom and I did a lot of outreach to organize the strike and were able to meet a lot of good people. I was the main youth leader and organizer for the strike, and I’m really grateful and proud of those who participated.” The strike also featured educational services to help spread information about climate change and green living, such as promoting ways that individuals can change their lifestyle to help the environ-
ment through means of biking to school or work. The strike lasted until 2 p.m. and ended with a speech by Crenna-Armstrong regarding the importance of taking action against climate change. “We had a booth for voter registration,” Crenna-Armstrong said. “We also had food and a booth for people to take a personal pledge to help combat climate change.” From Central Park, the strikers continued on to Davis Unified School District and then to Davis Town Hall, where the participants presented a letter to city leaders, according to The Davis Vanguard. “The youth of Davis, following the lead of people all over the world, are declaring that we have a climate emergency on our hands,” the letter read. “Our precious planet is dying and everyone is being affected by it. We are writing this letter to you, the leaders of our community, demanding that you lead the change.” The Sept. 20 climate strike inspired another, separate strike which occurred at the UC Davis campus on Sept. 27. “I’ve been an environmentalist all of my life and heard about the climate strike that happened on Sept. 20, but I was out of town at the time so I wanted to organize one for UC Davis,” said
Megan Phelps, a third-year environmental science and management major and an organizer of the UC Davis strike. Crenna-Armstrong discussed her reasoning for organizing the strike, saying she thinks climate change is a dire situation and a concern for future generations. “I really care deeply about other people and I also want myself, my children and my grandchildren to have a future,” Crenna-Armstrong said. “That is why we are going to continue striking every Friday. We want to utilize the power of the strike and show that this is not the end but only the beginning.” The Sept. 20 climate strike in Davis was meant to promote awareness, contributing to larger discourse surrounding climate change, according to the participants’ letter. “Davis is a very environmentally aware city, and we are grateful for that,” the letter read. “However, we are not talking enough about these issues in school and some kids don’t even know what’s going on in our world. Not enough is getting done in our country and our world about these catastrophes and so we need cities, districts, states and countries to start doing more to lead the change.”
ADDITIONAL DETAILS RELEASED ABOUT 2020 UNDERGRADUATE COMMENCEMENT EXERCISES Each of the four colleges to have majors split across each of the three ceremonies BY KEN TON G O L DS BY campus@theaggie.org After its initial announcement in Spring Quarter 2019 that UC Davis would be transitioning away from its traditional model of seven undergraduate commencement ceremonies, the university has revealed more details about Spring Quarter 2020’s commencement exercises. The three commencements are set for Friday, June 12, Saturday, June 13 and Sunday, June 14. Since the ceremonies will now take place outdoors at the UC Davis Health Stadium (formerly Aggie Stadium), the commencements will begin at 8:00 a.m. and conclude at 10:30 a.m. to avoid the high heat of the afternoon in Davis. Whereas in previous years the university held seven commencements, with each commencement consisting of students from a single college, next year’s three ceremonies will each consist of majors from each of the university’s four colleges. This means that the College of Letters and Science, for example, will have its students spread across all three ceremonies, and students will walk across the stage with students from each of the other three colleges. These revamped ceremonies will also be much larger than in previous years. Each commencement will feature 2,500 graduates and the stadium will be outfitted with additional bleachers for a total of 10,000 friends and family members. Each student will receive four tickets each and overflow, non-ticketed seating will be available in the air-conditioned ARC Pavilion, where each ceremony will be simulcast. While in the past students were able to peti-
KARI N HIGGIN S / U C DAVIS COU RTESY
tion for additional tickets beyond those initially allotted to them, organizers are still working on details to see if this will be the case again. “At this time I can’t confirm the ticketing process for Spring 2020 commencements at Aggie Stadium,” said Whitney Smith, the director for Ceremonies and Special Events at UC Davis via email. “We are still considering possible options of adding additional seats to the field and utilizing the grass area for seating to potentially have ‘extra’ tickets to offer.”
As was previously detailed last spring, the goal of this shift is multi-pronged. First, the university is hoping to present a unified view of UC Davis — graduation ceremonies will no longer be college-specific, but will “put more emphasis on UC Davis as a whole, as one of the leading public universities in the nation,” according to UCD News and Media Relations. Second, the university hopes to attract more high-profile commencement speakers because of the larger potential audience.
Under the threat of a formal lawsuit, the City Council of Davis voted unanimously to transition from an at-large voting system to district-based elections on Aug. 13. The months-long transition process is slated to finish on Nov. 5, at which time the city will adopt the ordinance and approve a finalized version of several potential district maps. Modifying the electoral system will change the way Davis conducts city council elections, according to the city’s website. Under the current system of at-large elections, city council candidates can live anywhere in Davis, and all city residents can vote in each member’s election. In a district-based system, however, the city will be divided into individual geographic districts, each with its own separate city council representative. Councilmember candidates must live within the district in order to campaign, and only residents of that district can vote in their respective member’s election. The first election under the new district system will take place on Nov. 5, 2020, according to the city website. Though the next election in Davis will be the March 3, 2020 primaries, city staffers said in a report that the city would not be able to complete the transition to district elections by next March. Consequently, the report recommended that the council should vote to move city council elections to November. The council’s decision to reform the city’s electoral system was a response to a demand letter sent by Matt Rexroad of Rexroad Law Firm, dated July 1, 2019, according to the staff report. The letter alleged that the current atlarge election disadvantaged minority voters in Davis, therefore violating the 2001 California Voting Rights Act. “Voting within Davis is racially polarized, which has resulted in minority vote dilution,” Rexroad wrote. “Davis minority voters have not had proper representation on the city council because of the at-large election system. Thus, Davis at-large elections violate the California Voting Rights Act (CRVA).” The California Voting Rights Act prohibits jurisdictions with at-large voting systems if the court rules that protected groups are disadvantaged in elections. Yet the city appears to disagree with the claim that their current system uniquely disadvantages minority communities in council elections. Mayor Pro Tempore Gloria Partida was singled out in Rexroad’s letter as the solitary example of Latinx representation on the council in “at least the last 20 years.” In the Aug.13 meeting, though, Partida expressed concern that district-based elections may not better represent minority populations. “Rexroad claims that our current system dilutes minority vote,” Partida said. “I’m unclear how districts will fix this. Any system in Davis will dilute minority votes because minorities are, by definition, a smaller portion of the population.” The city’s website further stated that attempts to fight the lawsuit would likely be unsuccessful and could cost the city millions of dollars. “Not a single jurisdiction has prevailed in litigation under the CVRA; several jurisdictions have paid millions of dollars in out-ofcourt settlements and all challenged jurisdictions have transitioned from at-large elections,” the site read. Following the council’s decision to reform the electoral system, the city began the process of conducting several meetings as well as hearing for public comment. The city is also divided up into districts, with the assistance of a demographer and community input, according to the city website. Ultimately, five prospective district maps were released on Oct. 1, along with demographic data for the potential new districts. The city will release revised district maps on Oct. 15 and will select the final district map in a public hearing on Oct. 22. In the Nov. 5 meeting, the city is scheduled to conduct a final public hearing of this process and adopt an ordinance to transition to districts.