Follow us on Social Media
the California Aggie
SERVING THE UC DAVIS CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY SINCE 1915
THEAGGIE.ORG
NICHOLAS CHAN / AGGIE
VOLUME 136, ISSUE 20 | THURSDAY, MARCH 15, 2018
WeRise Rally takes place at Silo, Sproul Hall
KAILA MATTERA / AGGIE
UC-AFT union representing lecturers, librarians promotes solidarity on campus
Living within a culture of academic pressure
UC-AFT UNION MEMBERS TABLE IN FRONT OF SPROUL HALL IN AN EFFORT TO RAISE PUBLIC ATTENTION
UC-AFT, a union representing lecturers and librarians on the UC Davis campus, held a rally on Wednesday, Feb. 28. Tabling in front of the Silo and Sproul Hall, union members were eager to talk to passersby about concerns regarding the Supreme Court case Janus v. AFSCME. In this case, Illinois public employee Mark Janus is arguing that his requirement to pay fair share fees to his union — although he is not a member — is a violation of his free speech. Fair share fees are dues that workers who are not members of a union pay to the union that represents them. Arguments for this case were heard by the Supreme Court the Monday before the rally took place. “This rally is called WeRise and what we’re doing is getting all of our union members together and aware of this Supreme Court case that is happening right now, which is called Janus v. AFSCME, which basically is being viewed as sort of an attack on all public unions around the country,” said Katie Rodger, a lecturer in the University Writing Program. “All of us could be affected by this Supreme Court case. Today is an information campaign and also a launch of what we are calling a recommitment effort, where we are going to ask our existing members to recommit to staying strong and part of our union.” Rodger described the recommitment process and why it is significant to union members and leaders. “[The recommitment effort] entails filling out a recommitment card which is a card that just says ‘I’m sticking with the union,’” Rodger said. “If the Supreme Court rules, for example, that we would need to start over again and sign people up for the union from scratch, this would be a way for us to know which people are already on board. It’s also a way really to energize people who might just be going to work everyday and [who are] not really too engaged with how the union has helped secure contracts and better wages and benefits for them.”
When asked how the union might approach individuals who do not want to sign a recommitment card, Rodger said union members were just hoping to get the chance to talk to those individuals. “There are a lot of people who have problems or concerns about our union, and we would really like to know what those things are because it is a union that represents all of us and we want it to be representative of people’s concerns as well,” Rodger said. “[I hope this rally will] raise our presence and visibility on campus, to get people excited, to get people really ready to act. We are not sure what action is going to look like yet; we are waiting for the Supreme Court to send down their decision but really being ready, I think, is primary.” John Rundin, a lecturer in the classics department and the president of UC-AFT on the UC Davis campus, explained the different arguments of the Janus v. AFSCME case. “For the longest time, the right wing in this country has wanted to defund unions and has wanted to basically destroy unions,” Rundin said. “Their strategy in this case was to claim that [the payment of fair share fees] is forced political speech. That is, when we force people to give us money even though they are not members, we are essentially forcing them to engage in political speech and that is against the First Amendment of the Constitution because you have a right to free speech.” Rundin explained the union’s disagreement with this position, stating that a large portion of union fees supports efforts such as contract negotiation. “The union has a lot of business here; we have to talk to the university and negotiate contracts and we also have to represent our members in various university administrative and legal proceedings,” Rundin said. “In other words, we have a lot of expenses that we incur that have nothing to do with politics, it’s simply the manNICHOLAS CHAN / AGGIE
agement of the workplace. Currently, if you’re not a member and you don’t want to support the political work of the union, what you can do is opt [...] out of paying the portion of the money you pay that goes towards politics. It is true that we do a certain amount of lobbying and stuff like that, but you don’t have to pay for that [...] and that’s been the state of affairs for a long time.” Explaining the significance of fair share fees to the union, Rundin made a comparison between public sector unions and city councils. “We are actually chartered by the state of California,” Rundin said. “We are really sort of a body of governance within the union and within the workplace. We are very democratic and we are kind of like a city council in that city councils are created by the state government. City councils have the right to raise taxes on those people who they are overseeing. Just because you don’t agree with the politics or whatever of the city council, that doesn’t mean you can stop paying. Essentially, when you say that people who are not members don’t have to pay union fees, it’s kind of like saying, ‘Oh, well, if you don’t agree with the city council, you don’t have to pay your taxes.’ That’s just not true. In order to have a functioning society, people have to pay taxes and fees of various sorts just to maintain things and keep things going. That’s our opinion: that we are doing nothing different from many other bodies.” Rundin said he feels it is fair that both union members and non-members pay dues because the union has to represent all workers in its jurisdiction. Rundin expressed his thoughts on what he believes the Janus v. AFSCME case symbolizes. “Basically, this is an attempt to defund public unions,” Rundin said. “It’s a major attack on the middle class. There is something like 21 million RALLY on 11
UC Student-Workers begin lengthy negotiations with administration Student-Workers hope to shift current power structure of UC
BY AL LY RUSSEL L campus@theaggie.org
The UC Student-Workers Union (UAW Local 2865) at Davis hosted the first day of contract negotiations on Feb. 28 at the Memorial Union. UAW 2865 represents more than 14,000 academic student employees across UC campuses. Students presented their demands, which will be heard at the formal negotiations held at UC Berkeley. The UC Student-Workers Union represents teaching assistants, associate instructors, lecturers, readers and undergraduate tutors across all nine UC campuses. Demands include maintaining wages to keep pace with rising costs of living, ensuring regular and consistent pay and benefits, increasing access to public transportation and parking as well as aiming to extend current Academic StudentEmployee benefits. Beginning six months before their current contracts expire, graduate students and members hope to reach an agreement with administration soon. Although agreements are
usually reached through a lengthy process of weekly meetings at different UC campuses, sometimes administrators and student-workers fail to come together before the current contract expiration. The group also aims to ensure ASEs have access to affordable housing and protect UC students and workers by declaring all UCs sanctuary campuses. It also hopes to further efforts to promote diversity, inclusivity and safe workplaces, extend childcare benefits and expand union rights, while maintaining all currently existing rights. Civil engineering graduate student Ellie White became involved with the Student-Workers Union after her own access to secure housing was threatened. “Our houses are going to be torn down in 2020,” White said. “Solano Park is the only semiaffordable place left to live on campus and the university is trying to replace it with units that will be much, much more expensive.” Looking forward, White is hoping to see housing reform demands come to fruition during negotiations. CHECK OUT OUR
Ph.D. sociology candidate Duane Wright is another member of the UC Student-Workers Union. Wright aims to tackle the clear relationship between the union’s demands and the failure of the university to meet students’ demands. “I see all the issues as interconnected, stemming from the undemocratic and mostly corporate nature of the university system,” Wright said. “It’s absurd that there’s an executive class that makes hundreds of thousands per year, mismanages mental healthcare funds and pepper-sprays protesters; meanwhile, students are paying more than ever and class sizes are increasing.” Amara Miller, a Ph.D. candidate in sociology, has been a member of UAW 2865 since entering the Ph.D. program in 2011. Miller described past issues reaching an agreement. “Our last contract campaign in 2013-2014 lasted around a year and wasn’t resolved until after several strikes and strike threats,” Miller said. Many students enrolled in the UC system will be taught at some point in their undergraduate
How much is too much? BY EMI LY NGUY EN features@theaggie.org
To most students, finals season is understood to be a dreaded time plagued by all-nighters, excessive periods of time spent at the library and copious intakes of caffeine. High levels of stress cause many students to experience mental and physical health deterioration during this time, but few students acknowledge and address the issue. Shrishti Tyagi, a third-year biological sciences major and a team coordinator for the Mental Health Initiative, attributes students’ overwhelming stress levels to the overly-competitive environment created for students attending a renowned research university. “I think as a UC school it’s very competitive in general, and a lot of students are not only doing academics, they’re also working part-time, they’re in clubs, they’re doing research,” Tyagi said. “I think it’s just the stress of everything else we do in our lives, and all of it adds up. Finals week is just kind of that build-up where you have to be able to balance everything out and make sure you’re still doing well.” According to Catrina Chan, a fourth-year psychology major, the publicity director for the Mental Health Conference and a former member of the Student Health and Wellness Committee of ASUCD, students’ unwillingness to acknowledge their stressinduced physical or mental health issues and seek out help derives from their lack of knowledge of the different services and resources that were specifically made to help students deal with stress. “I think that it’s a lack of knowledge of all the resources that we have on campus,” Chan said. “Even I’ll admit, I’m in my fourth year now, and there were resources that I did not know about until Winter Quarter last year. We have the counseling center, the mind spa, the nap map, the hammocks in the quad and massage chairs in the Women’s Research Center.” Maria Navarro, a third-year Chicano studies major, places societal norms at the root of the problem, saying that in today’s culture, admitting that you need to seek out help for any matter is heavily frowned upon. “I think it has to do with societal norms and how we’re not really used to seeking out help,” Navarro said. “Growing up, we don’t realize that it’s okay to ask for help. Sometimes it takes so much to get to a certain point where you can feel comfortable doing so.” Many would argue that we live in a culture that glorifies mental and physical health decay when it comes to academics. All too often, we see or hear students trying to outdo one another in terms of who has a heavier workload, who is more stressed out or who has had the least amount of sleep. According to Tyagi, this type of mentality has become ingrained into students’ minds to the point of normalization. “I think there’s that notion of ‘If you study more, you’re a better student,’ which I don’t think should be the case,” Tyagi said. “I think it’s so in-built now that even someone like myself doesn’t realize when I do it. It’s such a norm to [say] ‘I had two hours of sleep and I’m on my fifth cup of coffee right now.’” This process of normalization starts early on in students’ academic careers and resonates with them through college, according to Shreya Deshpande, a second-year cognitive science and sociology double major and a staff member of the Mental Health Initiative. “When students prepare for [the] college admissions process, it’s a competitive environment,” Deshpande said. “This competitive mentality carries through college and it translates into students thinking that the more work they do, the more they’re valued as a student, which causes them to make these sacrifices. FINALS on 11
UAW on 11 REVIEWS FROM GOOGLE:
“Affordable bulk food items.” C.C., Feb 2018 | “The hot food and salad bar offerings are imaginative and delicious.” dsthorp, Feb 2018
DAVIS FOOD CO-OP • 620 G ST OPEN DAILY 7AM—10PM
BY SABRI N A HA BCH I campus@theaggie.org