FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA
@THECALIFORNIAAGGIE
SERVING THE UC DAVIS CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY SINCE 1915
THE CALIFORNIA AGGIE
THEAGGIE.ORG
@CALIFORNIAAGGIE
@CALIFORNIAAGGIE
VOLUME 147, ISSUE 6 | THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2023
Campus prepares for fall 2023 ASUCD election
ASUCD is attempting to increase voter turnout after low involvement in elections of recent years BY SYDNEY AMESTOY campus@theaggie.org October marked the beginning of preparations for the ASUCD fall 2023 elections. There are six seats in the ASUCD Senate up for election this cycle, with 26 candidates currently running for spots, according to ASUCD Elections Officer Reid Rizk. Voting opens on Nov. 14 and runs until Nov. 17, but candidates are already following election procedures where they attend workshops to both explain how the elections are going to work and sign themselves onto the ballot. New candidates had until Oct. 30 to sign on to the ballot for the election, according to the elections calendar. Undergraduate students participating in the election vote for every seat. To better inform their decisions, they will be provided with each candidate’s statement along with the ballot. Current ASUCD Senator Dani Antonio, who was elected in the spring 2023 cycle, highlighted the importance of voting for ASUCD Senate positions. “The ASUCD elections are your rightful time to choose the student leaders you want to represent you,” Antonio said.
“Elected senators will be advocating for you and amplifying your voices, so it’s extremely important that you get to have a say in who will be doing so. Also, senators hold one-fourteenths of a vote on all legislation, including a 20 million dollar budget that is made up of student fees. We want to ensure that we elect student leaders that will advocate and vote for substantial and equitable uses of this budget to properly represent the students that we serve.” While these elections happen both in the fall and spring quarters on campus, past elections have shown a turnout problem, according to Rizk, and this is an issue ASUCD continues to adress through increasing student engagement. “The voter engagement in 2020, when we passed the basic needs referendum, was 25 percent,” Rizk said. “Since then, it’s kind of been in decline. Fall of 2022, I believe, was the lowest it’s been in a very long time.” Rizk explained that recent cycles have seen an uptick in voter turnout, but not enough to pass acts or referendums in the ballot. “We got 16 percent turnout last quarter,” Rizk said. “And unfortunately, TGIF [The Green Initiative Fund], which was the fee referendum that was on the ballot last quarter, did not get passed.”
Fee referendums need at least a 20 percent voter turnout to pass, according to Rizk. While this isn’t the case for votes
ALLISON VO / AGGIE regarding senate seats, Rizk still stressed the importance of student involvement in the ASUCD’s election process. “Student involvement is extremely important with elections,” Rizk said. “The people that get elected through these elections are campus leaders and
Antisemitic graffiti spray painted near Highway 113
The crime is being investigated as a ‘hate incident’
regularly meet with administrative staff like the vice-chancellors, provosts and Gary May himself. They advocate for the student body in the state capitol and even on the federal level in Washington DC. They also allocate almost 20 million dollars of student fees to [different] units and groups that they oversee. So, ensuring that the people that students want to have represent them and to allocate their money [are] on the senate table is essential.” Last quarter, ASUCD used incentives to encourage students to vote, something that, according to Rizk, will continue this year. “ We’r e just [trying] to build up elections again and create sort of an institution for elections here on campus, because all of this [ASUCD services] comes through student fees,” Rizk said. “And if we can’t pass a fee referendum with 20 percent, we run out of money and we will not [be] able to provide services to the student body and our community as a whole.” Antonio continued on the importance of student representation in the ASUCD Senate by discussing how educational incentives can play a significant role in informed voting. “I think it’s great to have some sort of incentive to [vote], given that we do not live in an ideal world where every person comes out to vote,”
Antonio said. “It’s definitely been a challenge on our part to encourage people to and is our responsibility to reach out to students. I do think that incentives without education mean nothing for what we want out of elections. We want to make sure that students know who and what they’re voting for too. We want them to have that autonomy to elect people they want to represent them.” Students who are looking to learn more about the candidates for the fall election cycle can attend the ASUCD Election Candidate Debate, according to Zachary Boggeln, Internal Affairs Commission vice chairperson and member of the ASUCD Elections Committee. The debate will take place on Oct. 14 from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. in the CoHo. “The debate is a great opportunity for voters to hear from the candidates directly and get a better idea of who their first-choice candidates will be,” Boggeln said. “It is also a fantastic way for candidates to have a face-to-face dialogue with voters to better describe their goals in office if they are elected.” Students can visit the ASUCD Elections website from Nov. 14 to Nov. 17 to cast their votes.
People for Bikes ranks Davis No. 1 city in California for bikeability
The city of Davis was also ranked No. 7 nationally based on several factors
BY ALMA CULVERWELL city@theaggie.org
BY CHRIS PONCE city@theaggie.org Content warning: This article contains discussions of antisemitism. On Monday, Oct. 30, Davis authorities were notified of reported
READ MORE Email scams commonly target UC Davis undergraduates for money and personal information
How to maintain cybersecurity and protect yourself from fraudulent job and internship offers
“antisemitic graffiti” that was left near a wall that separates greenbelts and Highway 113, near Rio Grande and Joshua Tree Streets. “Davis Police officers and Code Enforcement officers responded immediately and the graffiti was removed,” said a public release made on Facebook by the Davis Police Department. “The Davis Police Department takes these crimes seriously and is investigating this case as a hate incident.” Authorities have not publicly shared what the vandalism contained. But, according to The Sacramento Bee, the graffiti was of an Israeli flag with a swastika in the center replacing the Star of David. The Davis Police Department believes that the graffiti was spray painted sometime Sunday evening or early Monday morning. Authorities are asking residents in the area to send any relative information or security footage from the time of the incident. Information about the incident can be emailed to PoliceWeb@cityofdavis.org or at 530-747-5400. Police said that callers can remain anonymous. “If you live in this area and have any security camera video that may have captured the suspect around this time, or if you have information about this crime, please contact the Davis
Police Department,” Davis Police said in their public release. This incident comes less than two weeks after a vigil held at Central Park for the victims of the Hamas attacks in Israel. The event, which was organized by Israeli and Jewish community members, had police present to protect the event. Some elders even denied to attend the event because of safety concerns, stating they “can’t run very fast.” UC Davis and the city of Davis have a history of antisemitic hate incidents over recent years. Last year, on Aug. 28, antisemitic banners were hung over the Highway 113 overpass by four white men. In 2015, the AMCHA Initiative, a group that investigates and combats antisemitism in universities, ranked UC Davis among the top ten colleges in the country with the most antisemitic activity. Davis Joint Unified School District (DJUSD) responded to this week’s vandalism incident on Facebook. “DJUSD stands in unity with our entire community in denouncing hate in any form - it has no place here in Davis or anywhere,” the DJUSD said on Monday via Facebook.
People for Bikes, a cycling coalition founded in 1999, recently ranked the city of Davis as No. 1 in the Pacific Region, No. 1 in California and No. 7 in the US for bikeability, with an overall network score of 77. The city of Davis was previously given a network score of 27 in 2022. The city rankings are based on several criteria, including speeds, protected bike lanes, reallocated space, intersection treatments, network connections and trusted data. Rebecca Davies, city ratings program director for People for Bikes, described how the city rankings were decided. “Our City Ratings is based on an analysis of data from OpenStreetMap, which is an open map of the world, like Wikipedia but in map form,” Davies said via email. “We analyze every road or path in the city to determine if it is good for bicycling based on factors like the speed limit, dedicated bike infrastructure, and safe intersections. Then we assess whether someone could travel from where they live to nearby destinations using only streets or paths that are good for bicycling. That calculation is repeated over and over across the city to create an aggregate score on a scale of zero to 100 for the entire city.”
People for Bikes originally started their city rankings in 2018, where the city of Davis got an overall score of 72. Davies talked about the thought process behind the implementation of releasing the city rankings. “We needed a way to measure whether cities were making progress towards building safer streets that enable people to bike safely and comfortably from where they live to where they need to go,” Davies said in the email. “Before the City Ratings, we only had anecdotal evidence of progress, so we didn’t really know which cities were succeeding and which remained stagnant. Now we can identify cities that have progressed the most, cities that are moving fastest, and cities that lag behind, then use that information to advocate for more investments in safe bike infrastructure.” Davies explained that the city rankings measure the level of safe bike infrastructure and encouraged the city of Davis to improve its bike network. “Davis is an expensive place to live. Very few people will ride a bike more than three or four miles in one trip, so they need to be able to afford to live close to the places they want to go, which means Davis and other cities need to build a lot more dense housing in walkable, bikeable communities,” Davis said in the email. “Additionally, investments in bike parking, bike share and e-bike charging all help accelerate bicycling.”
Bikers make their way down 3rd street toward downtown Davis on a crisp Friday morning. (Sean Vanderaa / Aggie)