FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA
@THECALIFORNIAAGGIE
SERVING THE UC DAVIS CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY SINCE 1915
@THECALIFORNIAGAGGIE
THEAGGIE.ORG
@THECALIFORNIAAGGIE
VOLUME 148, ISSUE 20 | THURSDAY, MARCH 13, 2025
ASUCD holds budget hearings for 202526 school year amid projected deficit The ASUCD is facing a roughly $200,000 difference between expected income and expenses BY VINCE BASADA campus@theaggie.org The ASUCD entered several days of budget hearings from March 6 to 9, ultimately approving cuts to several units and committees but not completely bridging the gap between projected incomes and expenses. As of time of publication, ASUCD’s projected income for the 2025-26 academic year (AY) is $18,162,968, with an extra $5,639,078 expected from student fees. Total projected expenses, including salaries and wages, is $24,003,878. The result is a difference of $201,832. The difference at the end of the first day of budget hearings was roughly $164,000, meaning that it had increased by some $37,000 by March 9.
ASUCD Controller Mostafa Rasheed updates the figures for the Association’s difference between expected income and expenditures at the March 8 Budget Hearing. As of time of publication, the difference is just over $201,832. (Julia Heron-Watts / Aggie)
The proposed budget presented by ASUCD President Gaius Ilupeju, who also serves as the ASUCD’s chief executive officer, included several austerity measures. One reason for the cuts was a decrease in allocation from student services to the ASUCD, resulting in a tighter budget going into the next year, according to ASUCD Controller Mostafa Rasheed. Other justifications cited during the hearings included lower-thanexpected profits from the Coffee House and Unitrans, low advertising revenues from The California Aggie — which is managed independently from the student government but relies on student funds — and other reductions in income streams. Cuts made include the elimination of the Planet Her Committee, responsible for planning the female empowerment event first held in 2023, and the Aggie Mentors Committee. Expenses for the PRIDE unit were also reduced, now down to $12,500 from $20,250 in academic year 2024-25. Unit directors and committee chairs from Picnic Day to The Pantry advocated throughout the several days of hearings for budgets they believed would best suit the needs of their organization, to varying levels of success. The amendments and changes to the proposed budget are administered by the 12 voting student senators, alongside the International and Transfer Student Representatives, as per the ASUCD Constitution. Budgets for each ASUCD unit and committee are ultimately determined by these student officers, with some exceptions for certain independent units. ASUCD acts as both an employer of and the governing body for the undergraduate student population, with roughly 1,000 employees across its ranks. The highest budgeted units for the upcoming school year are Unitrans (allotted $9.9 million), the Coffee House (CoHo) ($6.3 million), ASUCD’s General Administration ($1.6 million) and the Entertainment Council ($640,000). Current projected expenditure for Student Government is $516,884, plus an extra $90,000 allotted to the Senate Reserves. Additionally, the Executive
Editor’s Note: This pie chart is taken from the currently approved unit expenditures, the final numbers present are not the final data provided by ASUCD. Branch, including the offices of the President and Internal Vice President, is budgeted $118,000. One measure in the proposed budget that was controversial amongst the table was the elimination of pay for students serving as members on student government committees (e.g. Undocuscholars Advocacy and Aid, STEM, Aggie Arts). Discussion in favor of committee members’ pay was led by Internal Affairs Commission Chair Amanda Clark, Senate Pro Tempore Dhilena Wickramasinghe and Senator Amrita Julka, among others. “As one of the two people [in the Senate] who actually has been in a committee, [committee members] do so much more work than most of the people on the [Senate] table right now,” Wickramasinghe said. “[For] people in commissions and committees, there’s so much more work than the three hours that they’re being allocated for”. Committee member pay was ultimately secured, with a comment from Ilupeju that sacrifices would have to be made elsewhere to offset the change. Concerns were also raised over the instability and lack of grants, given the
current presidential administration, provided to ASUCD for events and other programs — especially those designed for women and people of color. “There are less grants available in order to put on all these events,” Gender and Sexuality Commission (GASC) Chair Tristen Dillard said. “We need Senate support.” There were new budget items in this year’s budget, including funding for the newly created Vital Emergency Shelter and Transitional Assistance (VESTA) sub-unit, tasked with managing a new transitional housing shelter at Russell Park in association with Aggie House. VESTA, part of the Housing Advising for Undergraduate Students unit, was allocated $51,842 for staff. The budget also allocates $80,000 for rental of the new Russell Park facility. The prospective budget was released two days before budget hearings on March 4, three days later than required by ASUCD bylaws — as noted by several unit directors and senators throughout the meetings. In an email to ASUCD leaders, Rasheed, the ASUCD’s chief financial officer, apologized for the delay and attributed it to “significant accounting challenges.” Budget hearings have typically been
held in the last weeks of spring quarter but were moved up earlier this year to comply with university policy. Parts of the budget will likely be reviewed and reopened through the end of the year, including approval of the budgets of KDVS and The California Aggie. Both units were sent back to the Campus Media Board, the university’s independent governing body responsible for administration of those units, for further changes. “There is still a possibility of fixing the [ASUCD] budget if needed in spring quarter as this was a very early proposal,” Rasheed said in a statement to The Aggie. “We will see as the quarter progresses.” The final budget will be formally adopted during the first Senate meeting in fall quarter 2025 as part of Senate Bill #1. The ASUCD budget for the AY 2024-25 can be found on the ASUCD website.
Davis City Council, UC Davis, Yolo County meet to discuss local issues
The organizations discussed increasing affordable housing and building mental health programs for students and community members BY RORY CONLON city@theaggie.org The city of Davis, UC Davis and Yolo County gave updates on campus housing and the Crisis Now program during their Feb. 25 meeting. Two representatives from each of the three organizations meet annually to discuss issues in the Davis community and progress toward shared goals at the university, city and county level. These meetings build and maintain connections between the university and the surrounding city, according to UC Davis Chancellor Gary May. “Conversations like the ones we’ll have this evening are a vital part of the effort to ensure our town and gown
READ MORE March 13 marks five years since the symbolic start of the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S.
Students, professors comment on the lasting impact of the pandemic in professional settings SEE PAGE 10
relationship remains a model for other communities,” May said. “Whether it’s our efforts to combat discrimination [through] the ‘Hate Free Together’ initiative, our partnership in building a more sustainable community or strengthening our transportation partnership, every challenge we face is more manageable when we face it together.” In September 2018, UC Davis, Yolo County and the city of Davis agreed to a memorandum of understanding (MOU) that informed the school’s Long Range Development Plan (LRDP). Four main goals were identified, according to the LRDP Memorandum of Understanding webpage. “The terms of the MOU include a commitment to build more housing for students as well as a guarantee to house 100 percent of any new student enrollment growth on campus,” the webpage reads. “The MOU also includes the development of joint transportation plans and traffic improvement projects, the elimination of master leases in the City of Davis and the formation of a stronger town-gown partnership through a variety of collaborative activities.” In 2018, the blended vacancy rate for the city of Davis fell below 1%, leading to a severe shortage of affordable housing for students. However, Lucas Griffith, the UC Davis executive director of campus planning and sustainability, said that the school has exceeded goals for providing more housing to students in 2025. “In 2025, we built a significant amount of housing or beds on campus,” Griffith said. “The vacancy rate has increased to four percent.” Griffith said the university has
SLUG on #
also met its goals for accommodating enrollment growth. “Since the passage of the LRDP, we have grown enrollment by 2,600 and we have built over 6,000 new beds,” Griffith said. “So, we have provided more beds than our total enrollment growth.” Aggie Square, a new innovation campus in Sacramento, opens in May of 2025 and is set to house nursing students and medical students. Additionally, a new housing development called the Segundo Infill Housing Project is scheduled to go into construction in spring 2025 and will add 500 beds. Michael Sheehan, the UC Davis associate vice chancellor for Housing, Dining, Campus Recreation and Divisional Operations, said the rent escalation rate, which measures how much the rent is raised from year to year, has also dropped. “The other key metric is that escalation rate of 1.6%,” Sheehan said. “It’s levelled off from the previous rate, which was considerably higher — I think it was 8% last year. [It’s] another sign that we’re finally having the impact that we desire on the market.” When Yolo County Supervisor Lucas Freirichs asked how the university is making housing more affordable for students, Sheehan noted that properties at The Green at West Village and Orchard Park are coming in below market rate. “We’re actually below market rate in a majority of those spaces at Orchard Park by as much as 11%,” Sheehan said. “Those are public-private partnerships with the non-profit, [Orchard Park]. There are caps for annual escalation, so our gap will continue to grow over time.”
The city of Davis, UC Davis and Yolo County host their annual meeting at the Community Chambers. (Ojas Mishra / Aggie) Sheehan pointed to funding and design choices that made lower prices possible. “[These two properties] were both funded with tax-exempt bond funding because we partnered with a nonprofit,” Sheehan said. “We designed them very efficiently with an offsite, panelized system.” Representatives at the meeting then transitioned into discussing the Crisis Now program. Yolo County Administrative Officer Dirk Brazil introduced the program. “In the past, most of our emergency response for mental health and substance abuse emergencies have been siloed, whether it’s police, fire, what have you,” Brazil said. “This in front of you now is a combined effort to get out of those silos and move in a more coordinated fashion.” Brazil said two components of Crisis Now, the 24/7 Access/Crisis High-Tech Call Center and the 24/7 Crisis Response and Co-Responders, have been put into place. The third
component, a Receiving/Sobering Center, has still not been completed. Of the $3 million needed to build the center, $850,000 will come out of federal funds earmarked by Congressman Mike Thompson. City Manager Mike Webb said the rest of the money will be supplied by the cities of Davis, Woodland and West Sacramento. “Davis’ contribution for that, in terms of one-time dollars, is about $900,000 total,” Webb said. “I won’t speak to the status of Woodland or West Sacramento, but they’re going through a similar exercise.” The meeting was opened up to public comment on the issue of Crisis Now. Kimberly Mitchell, a Davis resident, submitted a policy brief with recommendations for how to improve the program. Her first recommendation was to expand the hours and availability of co-responders. 2X2X2 on 9