February 1, 2024

Page 1

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA

@THECALIFORNIAAGGIE

SERVING THE UC DAVIS CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY SINCE 1915

THE CALIFORNIA AGGIE

THEAGGIE.ORG

@CALIFORNIAAGGIE

@CALIFORNIAAGGIE

VOLUME 147, ISSUE 14 | THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2024

Students and community members strike for climate action Members of the UC Davis Environmental Club joined other community organizations in downtown Davis to promote climate action

BY RIVERS STOUT campus@theaggie.org On Jan. 26, a group of activists met on the intersection of 5th and B Street in Davis to raise attention toward climate action. The group included members of the UC Davis Environmental Club, representatives from the local Fridays for a Future and the Yolo Climate Emergency Coalition, as well as other community members. “We’re trying to gather as much attention as possible,” Rae Bear, a thirdyear environmental policy major and president of Environmental Club, said. “That way [people] know we’re here, we do care [and] we’re trying to help.” Fridays for a Future is a local club run by students of the Davis Senior High School, formed following Greta Thunberg’s 2018 protest of the Swedish parliament. “I’m here every Friday because it makes me feel as though I can make a difference in my community,” Kai Leonard, a member of Fridays for a Future, said. “Every time I show up, I see a group of like-minded individuals, and I can protest with them on the corner every week, and it feels like I can make a difference.” Other than club members, many

Davis community members protest on 5th and B street for climate action. older community members came in support of the youth-led strike. “We’re not suggesting how they set their agenda, we’re here to support the agenda they set,” Scott Steward, a

member of the Yolo Climate Emergency Coalition, said. The agenda is to focus the community’s attention on climate action, in hopes of encouraging a desire

to take action. “I’m hoping for [people] to reflect; when cars pass by us, I hope they see the posters and change small things in their lives,” Leonard said.

Students at the protest expressed their thoughts on student activism, strongly supporting the work that needs to be done for climate action. “I think [student activism] is very important,” Bear said. “As students, we have responsibilities. We’re at that age where we’re getting a lot of knowledge and information and we have energy to really do something and get involved. It’s really important that everyone steps up and does what needs to be done.” The gathering of people held signs on the road, sometimes receiving acknowledgment via an occasional honk from drivers passing by. “I’m here because we’re holding space and creating an opportunity to remind people that we’re in a climate crisis, while we try to rationalize continuing with the way we use our resources,” Steward said. “This is a community action that symbolizes and creates the narrative around Davis as being a place where climate action is a high priority, and more of our Davis fellows need to be a part of in a more effective and constructive way.” The older community members continued to emphasize that they were not the focus, and instead that the students were, throughout the event. CLIMATESTRIKE on 8

UC Davis to decide on renewing UC Davis Students 10-year pouring rights contract Demand Action calls on UCs to divest from with PepsiCo Both student representatives and researchers argue that renewing the contract would go against university commitments to health and sustainability

Originally introduced in 1893, Pepsi is a carbonated drink created by Caleb Bradham. Now, the company produces a variety of new flavor variations like Wild Cherry and Pepsi Vanilla. (Maia Zhu / Aggie) BY VINCE BASADA campus@theaggie.org UC Davis’ 10-year pouring rights contract (PRC) with Pepsi Beverages Co. is set to expire in June 2024, leaving university officials with the decision to either renew their contract or search for viable alternatives. PRCs are purchasing contracts that grant beverage corporations marketing rights and near-exclusive shelf space within campus grounds. Opponents of a contract renewal argue that PRCs promote unhealthy consumption and raise prices and that co-branding with

PepsiCo goes against UC Davis’ goals of sustainability and wellness. UC Davis’ current PRC, which was signed in 2014, gives PepsiCo exclusive pouring rights at athletic events and dining commons and gives them 85% of the shelf space at campus stores. Assistant Professor Jennifer Falbe, Ph.D., of the Department of Human Ecology is a nutritional epidemiologist and public health policy researcher who has studied the effects of policies and programs, including PRCs. Falbe is also part of the Beverages Pouring Rights Industry Working Group, an advisory committee focused on the

future of a PRC, set up by the UCD Preferred Partnership Program (UP3). “My research provides evidence that PRCs incentivize and induce the university to sell, market, promote, and make available Coke or Pepsi products,” Falbe said via email, also noting that she was speaking on behalf of herself and not as a representative of the working group. “According to dining directors, [this] can increase the prices that students, staff, and faculty pay for beverages.” Her research shows that 81% of students at UC/CSU schools both opposed PRCs and overestimated the revenue that they generated. PRCs do generate some revenue for the school through sponsorship — approximately 600 thousand dollars a year out of UC Davis’ total annual revenue of over 6 billion dollars according to Falbe. This amounts to roughly 0.01% of total annual revenue, most of which goes to the college athletics department according to the ASUCD Environmental Policy and Planning Commission (EPPC). Both the working group and a separate UP3 advisory committee’s advice will be passed on to the Chancellor’s Leadership Council, who will ultimately make the final decision on renewing the contract. Neither Falbe nor any other member of the working group could comment on the current status of the PepsiCo PRC renewal due to a nondisclosure agreement. PEPSICO on 8

Local Proud Boy accused of distributing antisemitic flyers on cars downtown

Mayor Chapman released a statement, which referenced the alleged flyers, condemning antisemitism in Davis

BY CHRIS PONCE city@theaggie.org

READ MORE UC Davis gymnastics wins two meets against Alaska Anchorage Seawolves

Aggies improve to 3-0 standings during the 2023-2024 season SEE PAGE 12

Content warning: This article contains discussions of antisemitism. On Jan. 21, antisemitic flyers were placed on cars parked downtown, according to the Davis Phoenix Coalition (DPC). On Jan. 25, the DPC accused Jeffrey Perrine, Proud Boy member and recent Sacramento-area school board candidate, of distributing the flyers. Anoosh Jorjorian, director of Yolo Rainbow Families (a project of the DPC), shared that she was in touch with Mayor Josh Chapman who was in contact with the Davis Police Department. Davis police shared they received one phone call regarding the flyers but not an official report, according to Jorjorian. On Jan. 21, Chapman released a statement that referenced the flyers and condemned antisemitism in our community. “Antisemitism, like all forms of hatred and bigotry, has no place in our city,” Chapman said in the statement.

“Let us reaffirm our commitment to tolerance, understanding and mutual respect for people of all faiths and backgrounds. We stand together and will not be divided by intolerance and will continue to support all members of our community in their time of need.” Jorjorian was made aware of these flyers after a member of the DPC messaged her photos of them downtown. “[They] sent me a message over Facebook on Sunday at about 3:15 p.m., saying that, ‘Some members of the community had seen these antisemitic flyers on cars in downtown Davis,’” Jorjorian said. “And she eventually sent me photos of the flyers and their horrible, horrible content.” Perrine was accused of distributing the flyers after Jorjorian was directed to an “Antifa newsletter” which shared photos of Perrine distributing flyers on vehicles. FLYERS on 8

the gun industry during divestment week

The week took place as a response to the Las Vegas SHOT Show, the largest national gun show in the United States BY BENJAMIN CARRILLO campus@theaggie.org During the week of Jan. 22 to 26, 2024, Students Demand Justice organizations nationwide, including UC Davis’ division, participated in divestment week. The student-led organization seeks to ensure that the UCs, specifically UC Davis, uphold their promises to limit their involvement within the gun industry. Roan Thibault, a second-year political science major and group co-lead of Students Demand Action, discussed what divestment week is and why this particular week was chosen. “[From Jan. 23 to 26], the gun industry is holding its biggest event [in] the world,” Thibault said. “It’s called SHOT Show, a trade event in Las Vegas, and it’s the biggest gun show in the United States. To respond, students made action chapters in over 50 schools to discuss America’s role, and call [on] colleges to divest from the gun industry.” Thibault then went on to explain

what this week entails and the importance of having such an event to hold UC Davis accountable. “Here at UC Davis specifically, we’re building on our divestment efforts from previous quarters by gathering more petition signatures, which now stand at 200, more than any other university in the nation,” Thibault said. “We’ve also been putting up flyers, tabling and talking in our classes.” Notably, the week’s main event took place on Jan. 22, where Mary Duplat, mother of a gun violence victim, spoke on her experience with gun violence and offered perspective to students. “She spoke about her daughter losing her life to gun violence right before starting college and spoke to our chapter about personal loss through gun violence,” Thibault said. “[She talked] about channeling that grief into a power and [defined] that a survivor is more than just someone who has been shot before.”

DIVESTMENTWEEK on 8

Impeachment of ASUCD IVP Aarushi Raghunathan withdrawn by Judicial Council

The petitioner in Monica v. Raghunathan withdrew the case from consideration just days after the Judicial Council ruling in favor of ASUCD President Ojeda

BY VINCE BASADA campus@theaggie.org The second impeachment hearing into ASUCD Internal Vice President Aarushi Raghunahtan has been canceled, according to the Judicial Council (JC) in a statement posted on their Instagram on Jan. 25. “Chasa Monica v. Aarushi Raghunathan (2024) has been withdrawn from consideration at the request of the Petitioner on behalf of the ASUCD Senate,” the post read. “No other hearings pertaining to this case will proceed.” As a result, Raghunathan will retain her position and office through the end of her term. Raghunathan was unanimously

impeached by the Senate alongside ASUCD President Francisco Ojeda in a special closed session Dec. 6. The first impeachment hearings into both Ojeda and Raghunathan took place Jan. 12. Raghunathan’s second hearing was supposed to take place on the same day as Ojeda’s on Jan. 16, but was postponed due to “unforeseen circumstances,” according to JC Head Justice Katrine Lee at that time. The news that Raghunathan’s case would be withdrawn came three days after the Judicial Council ruled that Ojeda will remain in office. The announcement was signed by Lee, Deputy Justice Albena Goulisheva and Justices Madison Whittemore and Samantha Figlietti.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
February 1, 2024 by The California Aggie - Issuu