Follow us on Social Media
the California Aggie
SERVING THE UC DAVIS CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY SINCE 1915
COUNSELING SERVICES AUDIT AND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY SERVICES PROJECT #17-67 / UC DAVIS AUDIT AND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY SERVICES
VOLUME 136, ISSUE 14 | THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2018
THEAGGIE.ORG
INTERNAL AUDIT REVEALS STEEP DECLINE IN COUNSELORS, $250,000 WORTH OF QUESTIONABLY ALLOCATED FUNDS
KYLA ROUNDS / AGGIE
Audit was done two years into $18 million UC effort to expand counseling services
This article is the third in a three-part series examining issues that counseling psychologists in the UC system are currently facing, including under-market wages, understaffing and high demand leading to systemwide recruitment and retention issues. The California Aggie recently obtained and verified a copy of an internal audit of UC Davis Counseling Services performed in December of 2017 by UC Davis Audit and Management Advisory Services. This audit was performed almost two years after the start of an $18 million UC-wide effort to hire additional clinicians throughout the UC system in order to “increase access to mental health services, reduce wait times for students, and complement outreach and prevention efforts.” The audit states that the reported numbers of staff on campus have been inflated to misrepresent the actual number, and that $250,000 worth of mental health funds (MHF) was spent by UC Davis in a manner “inconsistent with non-binding guidance” provided by the UC Office of the President. Additionally, the audit includes a graph (see above) which depicts a steep decline in the total number of counseling psychologists on staff in 2017. Vice Chancellor of Student Affairs Adela de la Torre requested the audit be done and said it provided “good feedback.” “We don’t necessarily need to hire more counselors,” de la Torre said in response to the audit and its findings.
In UCOP’s announcement of its fouryear initiative to hire “85 clinicians across the system” in 2016, the word “will,” used to explain what the UC will do, is used eight times in the original press release. De la Torre, however, objected to the word “mandate” being used to describe the UC’s plans. She said the fouryear increase in student services fees for the hiring of new clinicians to bring campuses in line with nationally-recognized staff-to-student ratios “was guidance.” Individual student contribution to the Mental Health fee was addressed in a joint response sent via email from Assistant Vice Chancellor for Divisional Resources of Student Affairs Cory Vu, Principal Budget Analyst Laurie Carney and Campus Life Content Provider for the UC Davis News and Media Relations team Julia Ann Easley. “For Fiscal Year 2017-18, all students pay $1128 annually, of which $113 are paid by undergraduate and graduate professional students and $100 by graduate academic students towards the Mental Health fee,” the email stated. When asked whether the hiring of new counselors with these fees as outlined in the UC press release is an obligation of the UC campuses or an aspirational goal, UC spokesperson Stephanie Beechem said the “collaborative effort [...] is ongoing.” Beechem did not respond to requests for comment as to how, specifically, UCOP is implementing the initiative. “The [UC] has not put the effort into trying to meet their own mental health initiatives
that they put out,” said Jamie McDole, the vice president of the University Professional and Technical Employees, which represents counseling psychologists. “There’s been a lot of turnover to our staffing, they’re not even close to the mental health standards they’re supposed to be achieving — of a therapist available for every 1,000 to 1,200 students. They’re failing.” The steep decline in counseling psychologists shown on the graph (see above) was due to the termination of contract staffers at UC Davis. The audit states that ten contract employees were hired “temporarily to satisfy general under-met student need” but “only one of the ten employment contracts was renewed past June 2017.” UPTE is currently in negotiations with the UC over its healthcare contract. Since the existing healthcare contract does not include any contract employees, who are at-will and may be terminated without explanation, several of the UC campuses transferred their contract employees to full-time positions during bargaining with UCOP. According to McDole, however, rather than transfer UC Davis’ contract employees to full-time positions, they were terminated — “they just laid them off instead of dealing with it.” McDole said a charge of “unfair labor practice” has been filed against UC Davis. Nan Senzaki, a senior staff member of UC Davis counseling and psychological services, commented on the hiring of the 10 contract staff members. COUNSELOR PART 3 on 12
Beyond the Budget holds town hall in response to funding cut ZOË REINHARDT / AGGIE FILE
BY JACQ UE L I N E MO O R E campus@theaggie.org
Members of the UC Davis Cross Cultural Center and other university students gathered on the night of Jan. 22 at the LGBTQIA Resource Center to discuss funding cuts to student centers on campus. The meeting was part of a movement called Beyond the Budget, which began in response to the recent $77,000 budget cut to the CCC’s funding. Beyond the Budget is unaffiliated with the student center. The intention of the discussion was to compose a set of demands regarding funding cuts to all student centers and communities to be presented to the Division of Student Affairs. “[We want] to give students a voice, address community needs, and hold admin accountable by drafting a list of demands including but not limited to #fundtheccc,” reads a graphic for the town hall that was posted in the Beyond the Budget Facebook group. At the beginning of the meeting, leaders of the event presented a timeline showing the date of the cut and the subsequent student responses to it. They attributed unsubstantial student activism to a lack of transparency on the part of administrators. Additionally, they noted that the timing of the budget cut, in the spring of 2017, might have been intended to take advantage of student burnout that persists as summer approaches.
List of demands to be presented to Division of Student Affairs
In response to the presentation, audience members proposed various ways to combat administrative actions that might prove detrimental to on campus organizations. One student postulated that if student centers operated solely on student fees, it would be more difficult for administrators to control the centers’ autonomy. Another attendee hypothesized that administrators might be monitoring the students that check in to different organizations. They noted that when students swipe in before entering student centers, their attendance data is collected by the administration, which might be used to correlate quantitative characteristics such as GPA to certain organizations. Others argued that changing the administration’s relationship with student organizations required more than delivering a set of complaints and requests to the Division of Student Affairs. Some were hesitant to believe that a compromise between student communities and administrators could ever be reached. There was frustration expressed with the lack of clarity and justification for administrative actions that impact student centers. One student brought up the short-lived Brown Bag Initiative, a free lunch program that distributed local produce to students in need. According to the student, administrators shut down the program without citing the specific reasons for the termination. Toward the end of the meeting, the attendCHECK OUT OUR
ees drafted a list of demands. One demand asked that administrators give “clear qualifications for programs” to avoid unclear termination of student organizations, such as the Brown Bag Initiative. Another demand requested that administrators be more transparent about how the budget is distributed to university programs. Many demands revolve around student autonomy and the ability to make most, if not all, of the decisions relevant to student organizations and centers. A survey was shared with meeting attendees as a way for students to share stories of how administrative decisions have negatively affected students or student organizations. It also gave students the chance to add to the list of demands to present to the Division of Student Affairs. “Feel free to use this form to bring forth your demands or narratives regarding how you, as a student, have been affected by decisions made by administrators in higher education,” the survey description reads. While the survey was only supposed to be live for 24 hours after the end of the town hall meeting, it can still be taken online. Certain leaders and members of the Beyond the Budget movement planned to attend the ASUCD Senate meeting on Jan. 25. “We are trying to pass a resolution of support for our demands and movement [and] need as many [folks] there as possible,” read a post in the event group on Facebook by Abigail Wang, a coordinator of the town hall.
Women’s March Sacramento Women stand together in fight for equal rights BY STELLA TR AN city@theaggie.org
The Women’s March in Sacramento on Jan. 20 was the second march for the city, and the numbers rose to more than 35,000 participants this year. The march started at Southside Park and ended at the Capitol Building, where the event held speakers who advocated for their beliefs on rights and equality. Angelique Ashby, a city councilmember for the City of Sacramento, described the march as a collective effort. “The march was the largest that we know of in city history,” Ashby said. “With more than 35,000 participants, the event serves as a collaborative catalyst — bringing people together. It’s not isolated to Sacramento. Marchers came from all over the six county regions with a unifying message of hope and partnership for a better, more equal future.” Ashby emphasized that together, women and those in support of women’s rights can bring underlying issues to the surface. “When elected officials see tens of thousands of women and their allies joined in a message of equality, it helps drive a dialogue through the media and the collective voice of an overwhelmingly large population,” Ashby said. The march served as an outlet for women to come together to let their voices be heard. “It’s rare and unique for so many people to gather,” Ashby said. “That matters. It has an undeniable impact on policy discussions.” Ashby was also a speaker at the end of the march. As the only female councilmember of Sacramento, she rallied the crowd, addressing them as an army to reach for equality. “Look around you — this is our army — our weapons are education, law, experience, talent and an unrelenting spirit driving us towards equality,” Ashby said. Marianna Rivera, a march attendee, stated that she participated to advocate against all oppressions. “We are here to be recognized and to have our rights recognized,” Rivera said. “We are here to fight against all oppressions, from sexism to racism. As women of color, we still have to fight racism. Part of our reality is dealing with all of those things. We’re marching for unity to show our strength and show our resistance.” Xico Gonzalez, a political artist, gave out his art prints featuring different activist women, such as Angela Davis and Frida Kahlo, to participants at the march. “I have been doing political art and graphics for the past 20 years,” Gonzalez said. “The main focus is to empower and to provide a voice for the voiceless through the arts. I feel good. I’m also a high school teacher, and I work right across Southside Park. I saw a very diverse crowd from just walking from there to here. Hopefully this is a really good march and we make a statement.” Nicola Smith, another one of the women at the march, repeated that she is a fighter for equal rights. “I’m fighting for equal rights for women, and I’m fighting for people rights,” Smith said. “I’m happy that there are so many women here and young women that are doing this as well.” Deborah Jory, another participant, noted that she felt ready to continue doing more, even after the march. “I came to the march today because I’ve been dissatisfied with what’s going on with our government for a long time,” Jory said. “I just want to show my support for all the women here. It’s energizing to know that you’re not alone. I do not think you get to a certain age as a woman and have not experienced some type of bias or abuse or discrimination. I feel more energized to do more.” The Sacramento march was one of the 673 “sister marches” across the world.
GOOGLE REVIEWS!
“Great ready to eat foods, wholesome ingredients for cooking. Lots of organic options, freshly made sushi, yummy baked goods...” Yvonne W.
DAVIS FOOD CO-OP • 620 G ST OPEN DAILY 7AM—10PM
BY H A N N A H HO L ZE R campus@theaggie.org