November 15, 2018

Page 1

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA

@THECALIFORNIAAGGIE

SERVING THE UC DAVIS CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY SINCE 1915

THE CALIFORNIA AGGIE

THEAGGIE.ORG

RAU L M O R A L E S / AG GI E

UC DAVIS TO BECOME HISPANIC SERVING INSTITUTION, CHICANA/O STUDIES PROFESSORS RAISE CONCERNS Professors think focus should be on currently-enrolled Chicana/o students who feel isolated BY DE A N A M E D I N A campus@theaggie.org

UC Davis’ efforts to meet the requirements to become a Hispanic Serving Institution came to a close in May of 2018, and now the university is researching how to best use funds granted through the designation it is expecting to receive in Spring 2019. While some believe UC Davis is well equipped to properly serve its Hispanic students, others,

M I C H A EL LEAH Y / AGGI E

DAVIS CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSES BRINGING E-SCOOTERS TO THE COMMUNITY Regulations, policies being established to monitor e-scooters’ impact on city BY LAUREN T RO P I O city@theaggie.org

Electric scooters have been popping up in numerous parts of California, and the Davis City Council is discussing bringing them to town. E-scooters, like the rentable bikes around campus and the city, can be rented and dropped off anywhere. Simply downloading an app allows users to gain access to the electric-powered scooters. The whole rental process is almost identical to the bike-share programs. There have been several concerns, however, regarding the potential issues these e-scooters may cause. In addition, rules are still being discussed in order to manage e-scooter programs. An urgency ordinance was implemented to alleviate concerns that starting these programs in the Davis community could result in abandoned scooters around town. It also was aimed to protect residents from getting hurt or hurting someone and to regulate the number of scooters allowed in

including certain staff members, feel unsure and hesitant about how much success the HSI designation will actually bring to students. Assistant Professor Clarissa Rojas of the Chicano/a Studies Department is one of those staff members, as her past experiences at different campuses has her hoping UC Davis will make the right decisions. “At CSU Long Beach, early rounds of HSI fund distribution were not duly informed by the Chicanx students, staff

the area. The Davis City Council came together on Oct. 30 to discuss the best way to determine expected rules and authorization standards so that the safety of the community will remain intact. The public’s peace, safety and health is the council’s number one priority in the case of enabling electric scooters in Davis. Popular companies that offer these rentals include Lime, Bird, Spin, Skip and Scoot. “Many cities have experienced problems with scooter use,” said Floria Partida, a Davis city council member. “We want this venture to be as successful as possible if it begins operating in Davis. We believe this is a good option for alternate transportation, and it would be more difficult to bring a program back that has ended badly due to poor management. Already, we have received multiple people reaching out to us with concerns. Any program would need to have well thought out regulations to keep everyone safe.” The city council decided to allow e-scooters to come to Davis as long as they are authorized and permitted. This would allow the council to exert legislative control over the increasingly popular business. The council’s goal is to ban scooter share companies until they create a policy that can take the city of Davis’ well-being into account. “The last time we passed such a temporary measure ‘banning’ an activity was for commercial cannabis,” said Will Arnold, a Davis city council member. “In that case, we then immediately began the process of forming a comprehensive policy, which we completed earlier this year. We have now licensed five dispensaries, which are either already open or opening soon, along with a number of manufacturing and other cannabis-related businesses. I expect the scooter-share industry will follow a similar path.” E-SCOOTERS on 9

@CALIFORNIAAGGIE

@CALIFORNIAAGGIE

VOLUME 137, ISSUE 8 | THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2018

and faculty leadership on campus,” Rojas said. “As a result, decisions like a significant amount of funds being used to fund a new Starbucks on campus were made, among others. These decisions misdirected funds away from the services and vital academic support that Chicanx/Latinx students needed to access for their success.” Recently, Rojas brought up the topic of the HSI title into her classroom, connecting it to the Young Lords — an organization active during the 1960s and 1970s that strove for self-determination for the Puerto Rican community of New York. Turning to her students, Rojas asked them a question to put into perspective what exactly it was the Young Lords were working towards: “What if you could decide what happened with the HSI funds?” At first, there were just some giggles and smiles, and then multiple hands shot up: “Free books!” “Affordable housing!” “Free parking!” What if? The answer to that question will have to wait until next spring. Rojas is not alone in these sentiments. Natalia Deeb-Sossa, an associate professor of Chicana/o Studies, is critical of the designation, specifically citing how there are plenty of students right now who need help and not just those that help the university reach their quota for the HSI requirement. “For me, it is really important that the university reflects or takes time to understand that they are not adequately serving the CHI/LAT students that they currently have,” Deeb-Sossa said. “So, it’s a disservice to accept more CHI/ LAT students if the students they currently have feel marginalized, alienated, somehow that this institution does not reflect them, doesn’t respect them. They’re not doing well in classes. They don’t graduate. They’re not performing well.” Deeb-Sossa’s assessment of the university’s current help for Chicanx students made her decision quite easy when she was asked by Carlos Jackson, head of the Chicana/o Department, to be the the department’s representative on the task force. “I wanted to be at the table and have input on this important committee,” Deeb-Sossa said.

JA MIE CHEN / AGGIE

GRADUATE STUDENT INSTRUCTORS ALLEGE SEASONAL PAY DISCREPANCY “Equal Pay for Equal Work” petition calls to eliminate seasonal pay discrepancy BY AARO N LISS campus@theaggie.org

Duane Wright, a graduate student instructor in the Department of Sociology, has alleged that there is a “serious problem” with graduate student assistant instructors (AIs) receiving lower pay during summer sessions than they would for teaching courses during the normal academic year. According to Wright, summer AIs receive two-thirds of the payment that regular session instructors receive. In response, he created the “Equal Pay for Equal Work” petition which demands equal compensation year-round. Wright believes that since the summer sessions are equivalent to a normal academic year class with regard to courseloads, fees and academic units, graduate student teachers should also receive equalized pay. Claire Doan, the director of media relations at the UC Office of the President, dismissed Wright’s petition, claiming it was an improper action to take.

5

$ OFF YOUR PURCHASE OF $40 OR MORE Valid 11/15/18- 11/30/18. Present this coupon & enjoy $5 off your purchase of $40 or more! Excludes Ownership fees, shares, bag fees, postage, gift cards, classes, deposits & CRV. Limit 1 per transaction. No photocopies. Not valid with other offers. No cash value or cash back.

HSI CONTROVERSY on 9 “UAW leaders agreed to the summer compensation rates as part of the four-year contract they reached with UC in August,” Doan wrote. “The proper forum for addressing this issue was and is at the bargaining table.” Wright, however, said a pay formula exists to determine salaries. Because graduate student instructors were not aware such a formula existed, they were not able to bring the pay disparity up during negotiations. Neither UC Davis officials nor officials from the UC Office of the President could not be reached for comment on the formula Wright alleges exists at the time of publication. Wright alleges the omission of the formula makes it so administration themselves are unclear about this stipulation to summer pay, making it harder to uncover and fix. “That formula cannot be found in the contract, so no one reading the contract would even know that people get paid less in the summer,” Wright said. “I can personally attest to this because I was on the team that negotiated the contract in 20132014 and I had no idea AIs were paid less over the summer, and I never heard my colleagues speak of it — the entire time we were discussing in depth each article of the contract. It wasn’t until years later, this recent summer, when I was hired as a summer instructor that I discovered this practice.” Wright is unsure whether this is a UCwide or UC Davis-specific situation. Furthermore, Wright questioned UCOP telling workers to wait till contracts expire, in four years, for any pay increase. According to wright, fairness in payment towards graduate student workers should be a higher priority. “I think it says a lot about the executives at UCOP that when an issue of fairness GRAD PETITION on 9

DAVIS FOOD CO-OP

OPEN DAILY 7AM—10PM 620 G ST, DAVIS • (530) 758-2667

DAVISFOOD.COOP

@DAVISFOODCOOP


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.