FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA
@THECALIFORNIAAGGIE
SERVING THE UC DAVIS CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY SINCE 1915
THE CALIFORNIA AGGIE
THEAGGIE.ORG
@CALIFORNIAAGGIE
VOLUME 137, ISSUE 11 | THURSDAY, JANUARY 17, 2019
DOWNTOWN DAVIS SHOOTER IDENTIFIED, HAD PRIOR BATTERY CONVICTION AND WAS FORCED TO SURRENDER SEMIAUTOMATIC RIFLE Shooter identified after ambush that killed 22-year-old officer Natalie Corona
JU ST I N H A N / AG GI E
BY KA E LYN T UE R ME R - L E E city@theaggie.org
The gunman who killed 22-year-old police officer Natalie Corona was identified on Saturday, Jan. 12 as 48-year-old Kevin Douglas Limbaugh. Court documents show that Limbaugh had a prior conviction in a battery case and was forced to relinquish his semiautomatic rifle on Nov. 9, 2018. The Davis Police Department said it had prior contact with Limbaugh, as he reported being a victim of a crime. However, prior contact did not indicate plans to shoot Officer Corona. Although his motive for killing Corona was originally unknown, the Davis PD later described the situation as an ambush. Police released a one-paragraph letter Limbaugh wrote before his suicide that read: “The Davis Police department has been hitting me with ultra sonic waves meant to keep dogs from barking. I notified the press, internal affairs, and even the FBI about it. I am highly sensitive to its affect (sic) on my inner ear. I did my best to appease them, but they have
continued for years and I can’t live this way anymore,” according to The Sacramento Bee. The typed statement was signed “Citizen Kevin Limbaugh.” Beyond the battery conviction, Limbaugh didn’t have other prior criminal charges and had no indication of mental health concerns. Limbaugh’s roommate, who wishes to remain unnamed, said that Limbaugh led a “troubled life.” Limbaugh worked at Cache Creek Casino Resort, but was fired after an altercation around Sept. 20, 2018 that led to his battery conviction. Officer Corona was in the street in between two vehicles involved in a three-car collision and likely unable to see the suspect when he rode up on bicycle in the shadows of the sidewalk and opened fire, according to witness reports. Corona was shot once in the neck and immediately went down. The gunman then proceeded to shoot at her several more times. After he expended all of his bullets, Limbaugh unloaded the magazine at least twice more to reload, firing multiple shots in other directions. He started toward one of the fire rescue squads that had
LAWSUIT ALLEGES UC’S USE OF ILLEGAL RACIAL BIAS IN ADMISSIONS UCLA law professor, AACSC seek access to data showing whether UC system violated Proposition 209
TIMOTHY LI / AGGIE
BY CL A I RE D O D D campus@theaggie.org
Dr. Richard Sander, a law professor at UCLA, is accusing the UC system of illegally using race as a factor in admissions decisions. Sander requested — and was subsequently denied — access to the UC’s admissions data. He, alongside the Asian American Community Services Center (AACSC), filed a lawsuit on Nov. 15, 2018 against the university system under California’s Public Records Act. The petitioners claim this data is public information and feel that the UC’s unwillingness to hand it over proves that they have something to hide — namely, the usage of
affirmative action tactics in their admissions processes. Sander, who has studied racial preferences and their effects on student outcomes extensively, is pursuing this data not only for his own research but also because he feels individuals have a right to access this information, which is technically public. The UC honored Sander’s requests years ago, giving him and many other scholars access to an extensive database that held information regarding admissions between 1992 and 2006. According to a press release Sander sent to The California Aggie, however, the university has “adamantly refused to provide the same data for admissions covering the years since 2007.” The university claims they cannot honor
@CALIFORNIAAGGIE
also reported to the scene of the collision, striking the boot of a firefighter who had taken flight. The bullet, however, did not penetrate the boot, and the firefighter was unharmed. A fire truck was hit several times, along with a nearby house. Another round was later discovered by a person carrying a backpack while putting items into the trunk of her car, as the bullet had gone through several items and lodged itself in a textbook. The suspect fled the scene and headed southbound on C Street toward Third Street — it appeared that he circled the block and ended up going toward E Street to his rental residence at 501 E Street. He then met with his roommate who was unaware of what had happened because he didn’t show any signs that he had been involved with the incident. One of the witnesses at the scene of the car collision saw the suspect drop a backpack, which was how the Davis PD got information regarding the identity and location of the suspect. The gunman talked to his roommate and stayed outside for a while until he saw law enforcement start to gather at his residence, at which point he went inside. Law enforcement gave him commands to come out, and at one point he did. “It appeared to the officers that he was wearing a ballistic vest — otherwise a bullet-proof vest,” said Davis Police Chief Darren Pytel. “He did not appear to be armed at that time. He shot at some stuff, went back in and ended out coming out again and wearing a vest and having a firearm. At that point, he went back inside the residence” SHOOTER UPDATE on 11 Sander’s request because this would require them to create a specific type of report and would compromise applicants’ privacy. “Creating a responsive report that would adequately protect the privacy of the individual applicants involved would impose an extensive burden on University resources,” said Claire Doan, the director of media relations for the UC Office of the President via email. “UC personnel estimate that it would take us weeks of full-time work to create a specialized data set for Prof. Sander.” In an interview with The California Aggie, Sander said he is more than willing to pay the fee to obtain such data, which cost around $8,000. He stated that he also believes the university’s supposed concern over applicants’ privacy is irrelevant because the data from 1992 to 2006 has been analyzed for more than 10 years and nobody has been able to identify any of the applicants. “The lawsuit is [...] seeking the same type of information that the university willingly provided 10 years ago,” Sander said. When asked what the best possible outcome of the lawsuit would be, Sander said that the UC should be consistent in its transparency policies. “The last time we did this, it didn’t cost us very much and nobody’s personal information was jeopardized so there’s really no reason, now that we think about it, that we shouldn’t do this,” he said. According to Doan, the university does not have to comply with the request even if Sander were to pay, citing recent court cases ruling that public agencies do not have to produce new records to fulfill a request akin to Sander’s. “In November 2016, a San Francisco tri-
WARNME SYSTEM FAILS: MAJORITY OF STUDENTS, EMPLOYEES UNINFORMED OF ACTIVE SHOOTER SITUATION Outside security system responsible for sending alerts takes responsibility for failure BY P R I YANKA SHR EEDAR campus@theaggie.org
Due to a failure on the part of the outside security alert company responsible for sending out WarnMe alerts, the majority of UC Davis students and employees did not receive real-time updates from campus police during an active shooter situation in downtown Davis last week. The sequence of events unfolded on Thursday, Jan. 10, during which time a shooter killed 22-year-old police officer Natalie Corona and fired several other shots before taking off into the city. The fatal shooting occurred at 6:55 p.m. and the UC Davis Campus Police Department (UCDPD) was made aware of the incident at 6:58 p.m. The initial message informing the campus community about the incident and the shooter remaining at large was sent out just minutes later, at 7:04 p.m., but not everyone received it, according UC Davis Police Chief Joe Farrow. “Instead of sending out some 60,000 messages, it went out with like 10,000 — much less than it was supposed to,” Farrow said. “The good news is, 10,000 people got it. The bad news was the majority of the campus didn’t get it. It just didn’t go out.” UC Davis is federally required, under WARNME on 12 al court confirmed that state law does not require public agencies to create new records in order to respond to a public records request,” Doan said. “In August of this year, the California Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s decision in a unanimous published decision.” If the university makes this data available, Sander said he foresees it serving as a catalyst for conversation around the issue. If the data were to show that UC campuses are using racial preferences once again, Sander thinks California should explore different avenues to address the matter. “It might be a hearing at the state legislature, there might be a lawsuit asking a judge ordering the university system to stop discriminating, it might lead to a new referendum on whether the university should be banned from using racial preferences,” Sander said. “There are a lot of possible outcomes, but I think they will all be furthered along by using accurate information on what’s happening.” Though this lawsuit is only aiming to produce withheld admissions data, with it Sander and AACSC President George Shen allege that the UC is breaking the law and factoring race into their admissions process. UC Davis itself has an intimate history with affirmative action, dating back to the 1978 Regents of University of California v. Bakke Supreme Court case. Allan Bakke, a white applicant to the UC Davis Medical School, was denied admissions twice, although his test scores and GPA exceeded those of minority students who had been admitted. RACE LAWSUIT on 11
Hands-on Marmalade & Scones Tuesday, January 29, 5:30 pm • Teaching Kitchen
DAVIS FOOD CO-OP
Celebrate citrus season by joining together to make a big batch of marmalade. While it cooks, we will make scones to enjoy with our jam. Plus take a jar home!
OPEN DAILY 7AM—10PM
Register online at davisfood.coop/eventscalendar
DAVISFOOD.COOP
620 G ST, DAVIS • (530) 758-2667
@DAVISFOODCOOP