FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA
@THECALIFORNIAAGGIE
THE CALIFORNIA AGGIE
@CALIFORNIAAGGIE
@CALIFORNIAAGGIE
the California Aggie
SERVING THE UC DAVIS CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY SINCE 1915
THEAGGIE.ORG
VOLUME 137, ISSUE 3 | THURSDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2018
A L EXA FON TA N IL L A / AG GIE
J EREMY DA N G / AGG IE
Café-dwellers, beware! Robberies at various coffee shops around Davis BY STELLA TR AN city@theaggie.org
UC may have repeatedly violated state law; UC denies charges BY SABRI N A HA BC H I campus@theaggie.org
The University of California is facing allegations from unions and complaints from the Public Employee Relations Board (PERB) regarding violations of California state law. John de Los Angeles, a spokesperson for the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees — which represents over 24,000 UC employees — commented on the union’s allegations in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on the case AFSCME vs. Janus which effectively weakened the power of labor unions. “The university, after the Janus decision, had been sending out mass communications to employees about the Janus decision,” de Los Angeles said. “Essentially, what they were handing out was instructions on how to drop your union — very much in violation of the law.” De Los Angeles referred to AB 119 and SB 285, both of which were passed last year. AB 119 required
public employers to provide unions “mandatory access to [...] new employee orientation,” while SB 285 forbid public employers “from deterring or discouraging public employees from becoming or remaining members” of unions. Both laws were placed under the jurisdiction of PERB, a state agency which adjudicates issues between public employers and their employees. Felix de la Torre, PERB’s general counsel, likened the agency to an “independent court system for labor relations…[that enforces] the state’s labor relations statutes” for public employers only. AFSCME took grievances to PERB about the UC’s alleged violation of these state laws. In response, PERB filed complaints against the UC. “In this case, what happened was UC sent out a communication to all of its representative employees at the end of June after there was a Supreme Court decision involving the rights of employees to join or support unions, and it did so without complying with the law,” de la Torre said. Danielle Smith, a media relations officer for the
University of California Office of the President, said via email that “the University of California disputes the union allegations and will address them in the proper forum.” De la Torre explained why the agency believes the university was in violation of state law. “[The UC] didn’t ask the unions if they wanted to meet or confer, and it didn’t allow them to send out a simultaneous communication with [its] communication,” de la Torre said. “We agreed that, if those allegations were proven true, UC will have violated the state law on a number of occasions. I say that because UC not only sent it out initially in June, it continued to send things out in different formats throughout September.” According to de la Torre, the next step following the filing of formal complaints would be to hold trials at PERB’s administrative hearing division. “Those trials are to allow the parties an opportunity to present evidence to support the allegations and to give UC the opportunity to defend itself against these allegations,” de la Torre
HA N N A H HOLZER / AGGIE
Anti-Semitic fliers posted throughout campus Students call for stronger, more substantive administrative response BY H A N N A H HO L ZE R campus@theaggie.org
ASUCD President Michael Gofman was on his way to class on Monday morning when he saw a Facebook post from a friend reporting the presence of an anti-Semitic flier posted at Young Hall. By 3
p.m., Gofman received reports of the fliers at the Memorial Union, Hunt Hall, Wellman Hall and Hutchison Hall. “I’m not scared for my safety,” Gofman, who is Jewish, said. “But a lot of my friends are. A lot of my friends texted me saying, ‘I’m worried about being on campus today.’ A lot of my friends are texting me
PERB on 11
saying they’re fearful someone is going to attack them, they’re scared, they’re horrified.” The fliers, which are credited to a local division of The Daily Stormer, a known neo-Nazi site, depicted recently-confirmed Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh surrounded by politicians and individuals — including a likeness of California Senator Dianne Feinstein and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, who are both Jewish — with a Star of David on their foreheads. Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who accused Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her, is depicted with the words “Good Goy” written on her forehead. “Every time some anti-white, anti-American, anti-freedom event takes place, you look at it, and it’s Jews behind it,” the flier stated in large, bold type. Gofman removed a copy of the flier, found by a student, that he had tacked to a bulletin board in his office on campus and observed it — “it looks like it’s from the Nazi era.” “From my experience, Nazis have gotten a little more subtle with their marketing approach,” he said. “But this is just right out of Nazi propaganda.” This is not the first time an anti-Semitic incident has occurred on campus. Last year, a sermon given at the Islamic Center of Davis called for the annihilation of Jews. In 2016, UC Davis printers received anti-Semitic fliers by The Daily Stormer. Also in 2016, UC Davis ranked in a list of universities with high incidents of anti-Semitism. And in 2015, swastikas were spray painted on the
JOIN THE CO-OP IN OCTOBER & GET A FREE TOTE BAG!
COFFEE BURGLARIES on 11
Jewish fraternity Alpha Epsilon Pi’s house in Davis. “This is a historically anti-Semitic campus — this is not the first time this has happened, this is not even the first time this has happened in my time here,” Gofman said. In the city of Davis, one day before the fliers were posted on campus, fourth-year political science major Noah Dickman said he found swastikas carved into the concrete at Arroyo Park. Since the discovery of the fliers on Monday, UC Davis officials and student leaders have responded swiftly and in resounding opposition of antiSemitism on campus. A statement released online by Chancellor Gary May addressed the fliers, stating the university is “working to identify those responsible for posting them.” “The message on these flyers is reprehensible and does not represent who we are as a community,” the chancellor’s message states. “In addition, the person or person responsible violated our posting policy. Our Principles of Community expresses our dedication to mutual respect, understanding, compassion and caring for everyone, regardless of their religious affiliation, culture, ethnicity or gender.” May’s message concluded by informing the campus community he will not stand “for intolerance of any kind.” On her professional Facebook page, student ANTISEMITISM on 11
DAVIS FOOD CO-OP • 620 G ST OPEN DAILY 7AM—10PM
Filed complaints charge UC with illegal, union-busting activity
The Davis Police Department identified four stunts of coffee shop robberies in Davis and surrounding areas in the last few weeks. Students and coffee-goers alike are advised to be more aware of risks. Andy Fell, the public information representative for the UC Davis Police Department, indicated where the robberies occured. “There are four cases that Davis PD brought to our attention,” Fell said. “Most recent is Peet’s Coffee on E Street in downtown. Before that, there was yet another Peet’s on Covell Boulevard and Temple Coffee on G Street in August as well as the Starbucks in Dixon.” Paul Doroshov, the Davis police lieutenant, elaborated on the information they have so far about the robberies. “All of these robberies have been perpetrated by young males,” Doroshov said in the Davis Enterprise. “In these cases the suspects entered a coffee shop, looked around, and began grabbing laptop computers. In some cases, the suspects grabbed computers out of the hands of people sitting at tables conducting business or studying.” Even so, the Davis Police Department is still investigating for more information about the perpetrators. “Davis PD is still investigating this, and we ask if anyone has information to please contact UC Davis Police or Davis PD,” Fell said. “Davis PD believes that they are linked because all the crimes are similar.” Virginia Roden, the store manager for Peet’s Coffee, described her reaction when she first heard about the incident. “I was discouraged and angry,” Roden said. “I was notified the night that it happened, as it’s part of our policy to let the store manager know if there are any incidents like that at the store. I will say that I was not aware of the fact that so many other coffee houses — not only in Davis, but throughout Sacramento and Dixon and other areas — have been having this issue.” Furthermore, Roden noted that she was upset about a lack of communication which, if corrected, might have prevented the robbery from occurring.