May 2, 2019

Page 1

Follow us on social media

@thecaliforniaaggie

SERVING THE UC DAVIS CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY SINCE 1915

the california aggie

THEAGGIE.ORG

@californiaaggie

VOLUME 137, ISSUE 24 | THURSDAY, MAY 2, 2019

UC-AFT union bargains over new contract

Failure of police disarmament resolution reveals divided opinion

LECTURERS SEEK LONGER JOB CONTRACTS, MORE SECURITY FROM UNIVERSITY

SR #10 FAILS 6-5 IN SENATE, LEADS TO CONTINUING DISCUSSION ABOUT DISARMAMENT

BY SABR I NA HABCHI campus@theaggie.org LUI S LOPEZ / AGGIE

BY CL A I RE D O D D campus@theaggie.org The ASUCD Senate meeting on April 11 drew a larger-than-usual crowd. The controversial topic of police disarmament was put up for debate, specifically in the form of SR #10: an ASUCD resolution urging the Administration of UC Davis to disarm campus police for the betterment of the University community and the safety of LGBTQ+, disabled and students of color, and especially those that occupy multiple positions of precarity. The resolution was discussed for over three hours and failed to pass in a 6-5 vote. Several senators who voted against the bill attributed their issues to the wording of the resolution, not its actual content. Authors of the resolution plan to rewrite the legislation and bring it back to the table. Blu Buchanan, a seventh-year sociology Ph.D. candidate, authored SR #10 along with members of the Ethnic and Cultural Affairs Commission with the hope that it would put a stop to

@californiaaggie

police brutality and create a safe space for all students on the UC Davis campus. “University police officers frequently do violence to people of color, folks with disabilities and queer and trans folks on our campuses,” Buchanan said. “We really tried to hone in on [...] a particular way that we could make our campuses safer.” The solution discussed was the disarmament of campus police. Buchanan argued that instead of making students feel safer, the presence of armed police can actually have the opposite effect for a significant portion of the student body. Buchanan cited the “Picnic Day Five” and the pepper spray incident as two main instances where the threat of lethal force was visible on or around campus. These events occurred in 2017 and 2011, respectively. UC Davis Police Chief Joseph Farrow noted, however, that the “Picnic Day Five” incident was an issue handled by the Davis Police Department, not the UC Davis Police. Though there haven’t been any recent newswor-

thy reports of discrimination, Buchanan continued, this does not mean it is not happening. Buchanan referenced black and brown students being removed from the 24-hour study room, saying that often times events like these will either remain unreported or not gain enough circulation. Talking about the Senate meeting where their resolution failed, Buchanan referenced two students in the audience who openly opposed SR #10. Cody Bynes, a fourth-year political science major, was one of the individuals Buchanan named. Bynes, a Marine Corps veteran, is passionate about safety and felt particularly compelled to attend the meeting. He feared there wouldn’t be sufficient opposition otherwise, and that the bill would have passed. “I don’t speak up about much, but when it comes to safety, I feel particularly passionate,” Bynes said. “It’s just always been in my nature, especially from being able to see it firsthand in the military, but this really just struck a nerve. I cancelled all my plans that night just so

I could go and sit there for three, three and a half hours arguing with the opposing narratives.” Bynes’ viewpoint contrasts sharply against Buchanan’s. He feels that the presence of armed police on campus is necessary for student safety, illustrating this need in terms of an active shooter on campus. “Disarming the police is disarming the means to protect students in a worstcase scenario,” Bynes said. “Following Officer Corona [...] if that shooter had wandered on campus, then the students that had been on lockdown inside of the classrooms — if we hadn’t pinpointed where the shooter was — he could’ve easily shot at students [...] it’s one of those things where if we take away the police’s means to defend students and also defend themselves, why is that productive?” He made clear that his intention was not to discredit gun violence, but rather to speak out over concerns for students’ security. Buchanan’s motivation for writing the bill extended beyond just their opposition against officers being

armed on campus. They also referenced the option of the 1033 program, which permits the transfer of excess supplies and equipment from the US Department of Defense to state and local law enforcement agencies. “We realized that it was growing especially urgent to deal with the question of campus police violence when we realized that the 1033 program, a program that funnels military equipment and weaponry to local police departments, was also affecting university police as well,” Buchanan said. This program, Buchanan claimed, is both unnecessary and also allows the police to view students and the community as enemy combatants. The best way to intervene, Buchanan insisted, is to disarm them. Farrow, however, made it clear that he has no plans to take advantage of this program. “The university can get surplus military stuff [...] but we don’t have any of that,” Farrow said. “We don’t have any military stuff from [the government],

The University of California American Federation of Teachers (UC-AFT), a labor union that represents lecturers and librarians working at the UCs, is bargaining with the University of California Office of the President over a new contract for lecturers and other non-tenure-track faculty. The latest bargaining session occurred last week at UC Davis, where 88 union members and supporters were present. An additional 63 members and supporters arrived at 11:30 a.m. to watch the session in a show of support. Katie Arosteguy, a continuing University Writing Program lecturer and member of UC-AFT, expressed concern over UCOP’s demand for closed bargaining sessions — a request that isn’t new for UCOP, who insisted on closed bargaining sessions during their negotiations with the UC Student-Workers Union Local 2865, a labor union representing undergraduate tutors and graduate student workers. “Today, we really wanted to try and show up in numbers just to demonstrate that we’re paying attention,” Arosteguy said. “They did not want to have open bargaining sessions, so we wanted to show up to just demonstrate that we’re paying attention and that we care about getting a fair contract and that we want them to bargain in good faith with us. We were pretty disturbed to hear them say that they don’t want students to be present, or reporters or student reporters, so we pushed back on that.” Mia McIver, the president and chief negotiator of UC-AFT and pre-continuing lecturer in Writing Programs at UCLA, described the bargaining session as positive.

POLICE on 11

UC-AFT on 11

Theta Xi submits plans to demolish Bryson, Jackson houses, build new three-story house on First Street property PLANS TO CONSOLIDATE THREE THETA XI FRAT HOUSES INTO ONE CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW BY CITY PLANNERS BY T I M L A LON D E city@theaggie.org The UC Davis chapter of the Theta Xi fraternity has submitted plans to redevelop its headquarters on First Street, which currently spans three buildings. The plans include demolishing two of the fraternity houses and building a new three-story house, according to a notice released by the city on Feb. 25. The properties marked for redevelopment in the report stand at 503, 509 and 515 First Street. Under the proposed plan, the structures at 503 and 509 addresses would be demolished, which includes Bryson House, Jackson House and a parking garage. Currently, Theta Xi’s headquarters are zoned across three lots, each with its own house. The fraternity properties span most of the block face located between D Street and the Natsoulas Gallery Art Building at First and E Streets. The

plans, however, would merge the three lots and re-divide the property into two lots of roughly equal size. Theta Xi plans to keep its Main House intact, which is located at 515 First Street. On the site of the demolished houses, the fraternity plans to build a new three-story building. During construction, according to the project narrative on the City of Davis website, members of the fraternity will continue to occupy the Theta Xi Main House. Once construction is completed, however, the frat will vacate the main house, making it available for new tenants or an outside redevelopment project. The new headquarters, according to the report, will provide 35 total beds and nine bathrooms. Theta Xi also plans to consolidate its living and study areas into the new building next to a new space for bicycle storage and maintenance as well as a new off-street parking lot.

“The project would also consolidate all living and study areas into the proposed three-story building with partial basement, a detached laundry, storage building, and trash enclosure, and associated site landscaping with exterior meeting and gathering spaces,” the project description in the report reads. “There would also be a dedicated ‘Bike Barn’ with bike maintenance space and a one-to-one ratio of covered and secured bike storage to beds.” According to the project narrative on the City of Davis website, Theta Xi hopes to address structural issues identified in the Bryson and Jackson houses, noted in a 2016 report by the construction company Pemberton Engineering. The original structures of both houses are over 100 years old, according to the Pemberton report, their construction dating back to the 1910s. Theta Xi’s Main House was built in the 1920s. The fraternity acquired the first of the three buildings

A L EXA FON TA N IL L A / AG GIE

during the 1950s. The project will update the aesthetic of the new building to match the surrounding city architecture while retaining elements of the original “Craftsman Bungalow” style of the two buildings that will be demolished — an architectural characteristic of the early 20th century era in which they were constructed. “[Demolition] will allow for construction of a more compact, consolidated singular

fraternity building that will also create a more urban edge, consistent with city planning goals for the neighborhood,” the narrative read. “The architectural theme recalls the Craftsman Bungalow style of the houses being replaced.” The Theta Xi redevelopment project is still in the early planning and approval stages, according to Davis city planner Ike Njoku. At the time of publication, the city was drafting environmental impact reports

SHOP THE LARGEST SELECTION OF BULK ITEMS IN DAVIS! OVER 500 product prices recently reduced by an average of 15%! WA I T I N G FO R CO - O P AD

for the development. Once completed, the city will circulate the report and re-open the project for public commentary. “The Theta Xi Fraternity redevelopment project is at the environmental impact report (EIR) drafting stage,” Njoku said via email. “We are currently drafting the EIR, which we hope would be circulated before end of next month (i.e., May 2019) for the required 45

THETA XI on 11

DAVIS FOOD CO-OP

OPEN DAILY 7AM—10PM 620 G ST, DAVIS • (530) 758-2667

DAVISFOOD.COOP

@DAVISFOODCOOP


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
May 2, 2019 by The California Aggie - Issuu