November 3, 2016

Page 1

the California Aggie

SERVING THE UC DAVIS CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY SINCE 1915

THE

VOLUME 135, ISSUE 7 | THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2016

2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION HANNAH LEE / AGGIE

UC Davis Primate Center under fire after death of monkey

Watchdog groups call for full USDA open investigation

ASHLEY LUGO / AGGIE FILE

BY LINDSAY FLOYD campus@theaggie.org

STUDENT BODY, STUDENT ORGANIZATIONS VOICE SENTIMENTS TOWARD GENERAL ELECTION BY GILLIAN ALLEN AND SAHITI VEMUL A features@theaggie.org Next Tuesday, Nov. 8, is a day that will forever leave a mark on United States history. This 2016 presidential election is like none other for a multitude of reasons, one of those reasons being that the nation may have its first female president. The UC Davis student body has expressed strong sentiments toward the election and the future of the country through The California Aggie’s General Election survey, which asked the question of how, in the students’ opinion, UC Davis thinks politically. The online survey polled around 200 students across all years and colleges, and allowed them to voice other options such as their race or gender if desired. One particular group is the Davis Students for Hillary (DSH), a political community on campus supporting Clinton and the Democratic Party in the election. Samip Mehta, fourth-year political science major and vice president of the club, described that DSH hosts events such as club banking, debate watches and debates with groups that support different candidates from other parties. “We are freely progressive but consider ourselves ‘blue-dog’ Democrats,” Mehta said. “However, we are not as liberal as certain

Bernie [Sanders] supporters because we have more conservative views on finances, prices and political feasibility.” While surrounding areas are predominantly conservative, Mehta considers Davis to be “extremely liberal,” which can be seen in the poll results taken from the student body. 54.3 percent of the student population surveyed said that they were democratic compared to 15.4 percent that said they were Republican. 71.3 percent said they were voting for Hillary while 13.3 percent said they are voting for Donald Trump. While it is clear that the DSH believes that Hillary is the most capable of all the candidates, Mehta is nonetheless concerned for the health of the two-party system. “I personally feel really strongly that the [those in the] GOP at this point should readdress [themselves], and think ‘am I a Trump conservative, or am I a McCain conservative?’” Mehta said. “The same goes for the Democrats. Should we address ourselves as blue-dog Democrat[s] or progressive liberal[s]?” The California Women’s List at UC Davis is another on-campus political organization and is a chapter of a statewide political action committee devoted to fundraising for democratic women elected into state office. Michaela Worona, third-year political science major and president and co-founder of

the Women’s List, is mostly concerned with the treatment of women in this year’s election. “I just hope that even though women are gaining more visibility through Clinton’s candidacy, we don’t take for granted that feminism has achieved its goal,” Worona said. “[Hillary] is still being treated much differently [compared to] Trump. It’s enlightening to see the way that gender comments and behavior are still at play even though women are gaining more visibility.” The “nasty woman” memes and shirts of Trump’s disrespectful comment toward his candidate in the final debate bothers Worona, since it reveals a lot about U.S. politics with regards to gender. However, 76.1 percent of the students who answered The California Aggie’s General Election survey were female, which suggests that UC Davis women have not been ultimately deterred by the controversial politics in this election. When asked in which direction UC Davis leans as a political entity, 94.7 percent of students said that the campus is more liberal than conservative. However, the voice of the Davis College Republicans (DCR) can still be heard on the UC Davis campus. Nicholas Francois, third-year political science major and chair of the DCR, described

One of the UC Davis Primate Center’s test-subjects died on Aug. 23 because of failure to close the separating door between the cages of two non-compatible monkeys. This offense follows several other animal safety violations that have occurred in the past year at the Primate Center. On Sept. 13, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) released an official statement of the incident, available to the public upon request. “On August 23, 2016 two non-compatible non-human primates (NHP) were injured after staff failed to secure and lock a divider door that separated them,” the USDA said in the report. “According to the facility incident report the NHPs (adult male macaques) opened the divider and were found injured when staff returned to the room approximately 20 minutes after shifting animals. Both NHPs received prompt veterinary treatment. One was treated for minor wounds and has since recovered. The second had a significant injury and was promptly euthanized. The staff member involved in the incident has been re-trained. The facility self-reported the incident to officials.” Watchdog groups across the nation took notice and filed official complaints to the USDA, pushing for an open investigation of the lab. The Center For Ethical Science (CFES) based out of Chicago filed a letter to Dr. Robert Gibbens, director of the Western region of the USDA and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), urging that UC Davis receive the maximum fine of $10,000 per non-compliance. “[The Primate Center] has violation after violation after violation; it is a criminal lab,” said Jodie Wiederkehr, executive director of CFES. “Pet stores with these same practices would likely be shut down, but when it comes to labs they are fined, then continue to harm and kill animals and the public never really knows. [...] Research is important to me, however, animal research is not effective.” The Primate Center recently came under fire in 2014 for another monkey-related death at the lab. The USDA published an investigative report in 2015 regarding the incident. “On Aug. 9, 2014, a NHP was injured while being restrained for treatment of a clinical condition,” the USDA said in an official report. “The NHP, a 6-year-old male macaque, was left while on a restraint board in a treatment room during intravenous fluid administration. At some point during treatment the animal chewed through tape restraining his upper body to the board, leaving his legs taped to the board. The animal was found to have a broken leg, was treated, and recovered from the fracture.”

POLL on 8

Cannabis cultivation permit problems persist

UC Davis faces issue of overcrowding ALEXA FONTANILLA / AGGIE

Construction in progress for classrooms, lecture hall spaces, triple-occupancy dorms BY KENTON GOLDSBY campus@theaggie.org Increases in enrollment at UC Davis have created a demand for additional housing and classroom space. Due to both UC Davis’ own 2020 Initiative and University of California (UC) President Janet Napolitano’s call for an increase in enrollment, UC Davis enrollment is now on an incline. Numerous on-campus groups and organizations will be affected by this enrollment increase, including Student Housing (SH) residents, sports clubs and administrators. SH has been preparing for the increased enrollment, according to Richard Ronquillo, assistant director of Student Housing. “I know housing has planned for those growths,” Ronquillo said. “That’s why we did a renovation of our housing facility in Tercero this summer — to accommodate the growth.” SH will open a new Tercero residence hall in fall of 2017, while plans for a second dining facil-

PRIMATECENTER on 8

ity in Tercero and a two-year renovation process of Cuarto’s Webster Hall are almost underway. This year, some housing units were converted to triple-occupancy rooms in order to accommodate additional students. “A lot of our newer construction was built with the idea that it could be either double or triple [occupancy rooms],” Ronquillo said. “The square footage is there for triples if we need them, but we can also double them if that’s what the need calls for. We have a lot of adjustment with our housing.” However, triple-occupancy rooms are not ideal for students like Harrison Morrow, a third-year wildlife, fish and conservation biology major who has lived in a three-occupancy room during his time at UC Davis. “I lived [in a triple] and there must have been three other two-person rooms [in the suite],” Morrow said. “That’s nine guys sharing one living space, two bathrooms and two showers. [...] It gets OVERCROWDING on 8

MEENA RUGH / AGGIE

Farmers’ overwhelming medical marijuana market causes “land rush” in Yolo County BY BIANCA ANTUNEZ city@theaggie.org Yolo County supervisors voted on Oct. 11 to enact a moratorium prohibiting additional permit requests for cannabis cultivation due to the high volume of permits the county had already received. The board met again on Oct. 25 and voted 3-2 to continue the moratorium, pending additional considerations. The moratorium was originally initiated for several reasons, including numerous requests for permits that engulfed the existing staff, concerns with cultivation sites near sensitive areas (such as schools and parks) and worries that demand for cultivation sites (for medical marijuana) would drive up land prices. “There was this sudden rush of interest in Yolo County that we really needed to put the brakes on,” said John Young, Yolo County agriculture commissioner, according to CBS Sacramento. However, there was some opposition to this prohibition. Don Saylor, Yolo County supervisor, voted against the moratorium, citing the sudden prohibi-

tion as unreasonable. The deadline for applications ended on Oct. 11 at 5 p.m., only hours after the board voted to pass the moratorium. “I know that there are some people [...] hoping to establish legal cultivation sites who were in the process of meeting their requirements but had not yet fulfilled those exactly,” Saylor said. “It was an unfair thing to tell them that they cannot proceed. I thought we should make individual, case-by-case decisions whether someone was in the process and exercising due diligence for the requirement or if they were just coming late to the game.” Before the moratorium can be removed, the council needs to make sure that the cultivation ordinance applies to all parties involved. They must also ensure that the county has the revenue to pay for regulation enforcement and application processing. However, this doesn’t seem to have stopped many countywide growers. The number of illegal growers, though still unknown, is estimated to be between 400 CANNALAND on 8


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.