18 | FEATURE OH&S
Industrial manslaughter law What you need to know. By Stephen Pehm, OHS Consultant – Action OHS Consulting.
I
n Victoria, from July 1 this year, the consequences of a workplace fatality became far more serious for employers who are not providing a safe workplace. The Workplace Safety Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 – Workplace Manslaughter came into law. This brought Victoria broadly in line with industrial manslaughter legislation in Queensland and the ACT, while similar laws are mooted to follow in WA and the Northern Territory. While there are no Industrial Manslaughter laws in New Zealand it should be noted that the New Zealand Government are outspoken about the merits of introducing such a law. Find out below what you need to know about this legislation as an employer or leader, along with considerations for strengthening your workplace health and safety practices.
AN OVERVIEW OF THE LEGISLATION This Workplace Safety Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 – Workplace Manslaughter lists the following objects (New Part 5A Section 39a): l prevent workplace deaths l deter persons who owe certain duties under Part 3 (general duties) l reflect the severity of conduct that places life at risk in the workplace. The legislation aims to realise these objects by defining the offence of workplace manslaughter through negligence contributing to the death of another person (New Part 5A Section 39G). The purpose of these new amendments is to hold the workplace parties with the power and resources to maintain and improve safety – namely employers and Corporate Officers – to account if a person (including a non-employee) is killed in their workplace as a result of unsafe work practices being carried out.
INSIDER 114 AUGUST / SEPTEMBER 2020
Owners of storage facilities would be classified as Corporate Officers. For a conviction to be recorded it would have to be proven that the death was directly due to the negligence of the employer or Corporate Officer in maintaining workplace safety. Negligence is defined in section 39 (E) as “a great falling short of the standard of care that would have been taken by a reasonable person in the circumstances in which the conduct was engaged in.” It would also have to be proven that the negligence occurred for a high-risk work activity which caused the harm. Note that these may include psychosocial and illness based risk related activities and may be applied retrospectively.
A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE PENALTIES Maximum penalties are far more serious than those currently in place for conviction under the Workplace safety Acts. For example, if convicted
in Victoria you may be imprisoned for up to 20 years and fined $16.5 million (100,000 ‘Penalty Units’), a five-fold increase in severity of maximum penalties. If charged with industrial manslaughter, a court would need to be satisfied of three factors before making a finding of guilt: l whether there was negligent conduct; l whether there was a breach of a safety duty; and l whether the conduct and breach led to the death of a person.
AVOIDING A PROSECUTION The best way to avoid an industrial manslaughter prosecution is to provide a safe workplace for all users by ensuring your high risk work practices are safe. Typical high risk activities in storage facilities may include (but not be limited to): driving or towing, operating mobile plant such as forklifts or Elevated Work Platforms and managing pedestrian traffic, or working at heights greater than two metres.
www.selfstorage.org.au
