The Rice Blast Fungus and Allied Species: A Monograph of the Fungal Order Magnaporthales

Page 1


Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Magnaporthales and Recommendations for Scientific Names of Genera

History of Magnaporthales Taxonomy

The first described species in Magnaporthales was the rice stem rot fungus. It was named Sclerotium oryzae on the basis of the sclerotial morph (Cattaneo, 1877) (Fig. 1.1). Its conidial morphs were subsequently named Nakataea sigmoidea (Hara, 1939). The sexual morph of this fungus was not discovered until almost a century later. Krause and Webster (1972) established a new genus, Magnaporthe in Diaporthales, to accommodate the sexual morph of this species as Magnaporthe salvinii Four more species were added to the genus on the basis of their sexual morphology: M. grisea, M. oryzae, M. poae, and M. rhizophila (Fig. 1.2).

In 1880, Saccardo established the genus Pyricularia (pyri: pear-shaped conidia) (Fig. 1.3) based on P. grisea on crabgrass (Saccardo, 1880) and including primarily asexual species. The rice isolates were designated P. oryzae by Cavara (1892), which now is known as the rice blast fungus. Since then, over 70 names have been placed in Pyricularia, many of which cause blast diseases of monocotyledonous plants. However, only a fraction of Pyricularia species have been included in modern phylogenetic analyses (Tosa and Chuma, 2014).

The sexual morph of P. grisea was first developed from crossing experiments in culture (Hebert, 1971), and it was placed in the genus Ceratosphaeria. Barr (1977) later moved it to Magnaporthe because its ascospore morphology was similar to that of the

type species, M. salvinii. The sexual morph of the rice blast fungus also was obtained by laboratory crossing experiments and was named M. oryzae (Couch and Kohn, 2002). However, phylogenetic and phylogenomic analyses demonstrate that the rice blast fungus does not belong in Magnaporthe (Luo

FIG. 1.1. Sclerotia of the rice stem rot fungus Nakataea oryzae. (Courtesy J. Luo and N. Zhang—© APS)

and Zhang, 2013; Luo et al., 2015a; Murata et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2011) (Fig. 1.4). Rather the type species of Magnaporthe, M. salvinii, belongs in Magnaporthaceae and is not congeneric with P. grisea and P. oryzae placed in Pyriculariaceae. Placement of the sexual morph of the rice blast fungus, P. oryzae, in Magnaporthe was based on incomplete data.

Traditionally, mycologists have given considerable weight to ascospore morphology, such as shape, size, pigmentation, and wall ornamentation, in delimiting genera in ascomycetes. With the development of polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing technology in the early 1990s, molecular phylogeny has become a powerful approach for understanding fungal systematics. Molecular phylogenetic studies suggest that taxonomy based on traditional morphological characteristics does not always reflect evolutionary history. A six-gene phylogeny, specifically the largest subunit of the RNA polymerase II gene (RPB1), translation elongation factor 1-alpha gene (TEF1), a DNA replication licensing factor gene (MCM7 ), the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the nuclear rRNA genes, 18S rRNA gene (18S), and 28S rRNA gene (28S), has been applied to genera in Magnaporthales. Zhang et al. (2011) pointed out that both Gaeumannomyces and Magnaporthe, two important genera in Magnaporthales, are polyphyletic. Taxonomic revisions of these taxa subsequently have been made by Luo and Zhang (2013), Klaubauf et al. (2014), Hernández-Restrepo et al. (2016), and Zhang et al. (2016). Pathology and characteristics of the asexual morph, rather than ascospore morphology, correspond better with phylogenetic relationships of these fungi. The six-gene phylogeny also recognizes two major clades in these fungi; one clade includes root-infecting species that produce phialophora-like conidia, while the other clade includes fungi causing blast diseases that produce pyricularia-like conidia (Zhang et al., 2011).

The family Magnaporthaceae was proposed for a group of cereal- and grass-associated fungi centered on species causing rice stem rot and blast symptoms, along with species of Buergenerula, Clasterosphaeria, Gaeumannomyces, Herbampulla, and Omnidemptus, most of which are necrotrophic or hemibiotrophic pathogens (Cannon, 1994). Early taxonomic studies placed the rice blast fungus and allied species in different orders in Ascomycota, such as Diaporthales, Phyllachorales, and Xylariales (Barr, 1977; Krause and Webster, 1972). Later molecular phylogenetic analyses supported a monophyletic Magnaporthaceae, as defined by Cannon (1994), placing it in the subclass Sordariomycetidae (Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota). However, subsequent analyses supported variable phylogenetic affinities for this family. For example, in Zhang and Blackwell’s (2001) 18S rDNA tree, Magnaporthaceae formed a sister clade with Ophiostomatales. The 28S rDNA tree generated by Huhndorf et al. (2008) proposed a close relationship between Magnaporthaceae and Sordariales,

FIG. 1.2. Perithecium (A) and ascus and ascospores (B) of Magnaporthiopsis poae. (Courtesy J. Luo and N. Zhang— © APS)
FIG. 1.3. Pear-shaped conidia of Pyricularia grisea (Courtesy J. Luo and N. Zhang—© APS)

Chaetosphaeriales, and Boliniales. In the 18S tree of Thongkantha et al. (2009), Magnaporthaceae formed a clade sister to Diaporthales and Ophiostomatales; however, in the same paper, the 28S rDNA tree grouped them with Chaetosphaeriales and Sordariaceae (Thongkantha et al., 2009). Zhang et al. (2006) generated a four-gene phylogeny (TEF1; the second largest subunit of RNA polymerase II, RPB2; 18S; and 28S) and suggested that the rice blast fungus was most closely related to Diaporthales. However, no other taxa in Magnaporthaceae were included in the analysis (Zhang et al., 2006). Poor taxon sampling resulting

from a lack of sequence data from nonmodel species in Magnaporthaceae and phylogenetic heterogeneity among gene loci (Ebersberger et al., 2012; Fitzpatrick et al., 2006) likely explain the conflicting tree topologies in these studies.

In 2009, a new order, Magnaporthales, with a single family was established (Thongkantha et al., 2009), characterized by nonstromatic black perithecia usually with long, hairy necks, persistent asci, and fusiform (spindle-shaped) or filiform (needle-shaped) ascospores. The asexual morphs are hyphomycetous and variable but can be categorized into two types:

FIG. 1.4. Maximum likelihood tree of 24 Magnaporthales species and five Sordariomycetes species used as outgroup species based on 82,715 amino acid positions derived from 226 genes. The infection sites and the morphology of sexual and asexual states for the three major Magnaporthales clades are illustrated (right panel). The supporting values for each node were estimated using 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The strain number and genome size (if available) for each species are provided (Luo et al., 2015a). Note that Buergenerula spartinae, Bussabanomyces longisporus, Nakataea oryzae, and Omnidemptus affinis are associated with aboveground parts of host plants, which is an exception in clade A. Pyricularia oryzae is associated with both the leaf and root of the host plant, which is an exception in clade B. (Reproduced according to terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License from Luo, J., Qiu, H., Cai, G., et al. Phylogenomic analysis uncovers the evolutionary history of nutrition and infection mode in rice blast fungus and other Magnaporthales. Sci. Rep. 5, 9448 (2015). doi.org/10.1038/srep09448)

pyricularia-like and phialophora-like (Fig. 1.4). Several asexual genera have been linked to Magnaporthales, including Clasterosporium, Didymobotryum, Harpophora, Mycoleptodiscus, Nakataea, Phialophora, Pseudotracylla, Pyricularia, Sclerotium, and Trichocladium (Cannon, 1994; Cannon and Alcorn, 1994; Gams, 2000; Huhndorf et al., 2008; Kohlmeyer and VolkmannKohlmeyer, 1995; Thongkantha et al., 2009). Currently, Clasterosporium, Nakataea, Pseudotracylla, and Pyricularia are maintained in Magnaporthales (Luo and Zhang, 2013; Zhang et al., 2016). Harpophora is treated as a synonym of Gaeumannomyces (Luo et al., 2015b), while Didymobotryum, Mycoleptodiscus, Phialophora, Sclerotium, and Trichocladium are excluded from Magnaporthales (Klaubauf et al., 2014). Some

pathogenic species produce specialized infection structures (appressoria and hyphopodia) when colonizing their host plants. The hyphal pressing organs can generate strong turgor pressure to penetrate the host cells (Dean et al., 2005). Magnaporthales currently contains over 200 species (Table 1.1). In addition, an increasing number of environmental sequences of uncultured members of Magnaporthales have been deposited in GenBank, suggesting cryptic diversity of the order.

To generate a robust phylogeny for Magnaporthales, Luo et al. (2015a) performed a phylogenomic analysis of more than 200 genes. The results indicated that Magnaporthales is a monophyletic order, sister to Ophiostomatales (Fig. 1.5) (Luo et al., 2015a).

FIG. 1.5. Maximum likelihood tree of 21 Pezizomycotina spp. and two Saccharomycetes spp. used as outgroup species based on 83,616 amino acid positions derived from 226 genes. The morphology of the sexual and asexual states for Magnaporthales and closely related species is shown (right panel). The supporting values for each node were estimated using 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The strain number and genome size for each species are provided (Luo et al., 2015a). (Reproduced according to terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License from Luo, J., Qiu, H., Cai, G., et al. Phylogenomic analysis uncovers the evolutionary history of nutrition and infection mode in rice blast fungus and other Magnaporthales. Sci. Rep. 5, 9448 (2015). doi.org/10.1038/srep09448)

TABLE 1.1. Species currently included in Magnaporthalesa

Taxa

Magnaporthaceae

Aquafiliformis lignicola Submerged wood Saprotroph China Luo et al., 2019

Bifusisporella sorghi Sorghum bicolor Endophyte Brazil Silva et al., 2019

Buergenerula biseptata Carex sp.

Buergenerula caricis Carex aquatilis

Unknown Canada, U.K. Cannon et al., 1985

Unknown Canada Arx, 1977

Buergenerula spartinae Spartina sp. Saprotroph Argentina, Canada, U.K., U.S.A Kohlmeyer and Gessner, 1976

Buergenerula zelandica Carex sinclairii, Carex virgata

Unknown New Zealand McKenzie, 1991

Bussabanomyces longisporus Amomum siamense Endophyte Thailand Bussaban et al., 2003; Klaubauf et al., 2014

Clasterosporium caricinum Carex appendiculata, Carex aquatilis, Carex spicata, Scirpus acutus

Clavatisporella musicola Musa sp.

Pathogen Canada, Poland, Russia, U.K., U.S.A. Simmons, 1995

Unknown Indonesia Hyde, 1995

Falciphoriella solaniterrestris Soil Saprotroph Netherlands Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2016

Falciphora oryzae Oryza granulata Endophyte China Luo et al., 2015b; Yuan et al., 2010

Gaeumannomycella caricis Carex rostrata

Gaeumannomycella caricicola Carex remota

Gaeumannomyces amomi Amomum siamense, Alpinia malaccensis

Gaeumannomyces arxii Pennisetum clandestinum, Stenotaphrum secundatum

Gaeumannomyces australiensis

Triticum aestivum

Unknown U.K. Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2016

Unknown Germany Crous et al., 2019

Endophyte Thailand Bussaban et al., 2001

Unknown Australia, U.S.A. Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2016

Unknown Australia Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2016

Gaeumannomyces avenae Agrostis sp., Avena sp. Pathogen Australia, Canada, France, Ireland, Japan, Netherlands, South Africa, U.K., U.S.A.

Gaeumannomyces californicus Stenotaphrum secundatum

Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2016; Walker, 1973;

Unknown U.S.A. Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2016

Gaeumannomyces ellisiorum Deschampsia caespitosa Unknown U.K. Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2016

Gaeumannomyces floridanus Stenotaphrum secundatum

a Courtesy J. Luo and N. Zhang—© APS.

Unknown U.S.A. Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2016

b The following website is used in addition to the listed references: Farr, D. F., and Rossman, A. Y. n.d. Fungal Databases, Systematic Mycology and Microbiology Laboratory. Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. http://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/ (continued )

TABLE 1.1. Species currently included in Magnaporthalesa

Magnaporthaceae

(continued )

Gaeumannomyces fusiformis Oryza sativa

Gaeumannomyces glycinicola Glycine max

Gaeumannomyces graminicola

Ctenanthe sp., Stenotaphrum secundatum, Eremochloa ophiuroides

Gaeumannomyces graminis Cynodon sp., Agropyron sp.

Gaeumannomyces hyphopodioides

Avena sp., Pennisetum clandestinum, Triticum aestivum, Zea mays

Unknown U.S.A. Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2016

Unknown U.S.A. Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2016

Unknown Netherlands, U.S.A.

Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2016

Pathogen Italy, U.S.A. Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2016

Pathogen Australia, Germany, Poland, U.K. Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2016

Gaeumannomyces licualae Licuala sp. Saprotroph Brunei Fröhlich and Hyde, 2000

Gaeumannomyces mirabilis Sasa veitchii

Gaeumannomyces nanograminis Cynodon sp.

Gaeumannomyces oryzicola Oryza sativa

Gaeumannomyces radicicola Zea mays

Gaeumannomyces setariicola Setaria italica

Unknown Japan Hino and Katumoto, 1955; Vasilyeva, 1998

Pathogen U.S.A. Vines et al., 2021

Unknown U.S.A. Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2016

Pathogen Canada, China, South Africa Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2016; Luo et al., 2015b

Unknown South Africa Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2016

Gaeumannomyces tritici Triticum sp., Hordeum sp., Elymus repens, Agropyron sp. Pathogen Australia, U.S.A. Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2016

Gaeumannomyces walkeri Stenotaphrum secundatum Unknown U.S.A. Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2016

Gaeumannomyces wongoonoo Stenotaphrum secundatum Pathogen Australia Wong, 2002

Herbampulla crassirostris Carex firma, Sesleria varia Unknown Australia, Switzerland Scheuer and Nograsek, 1993

Kohlmeyeriopsis medullaris Juncus roemerianus Unknown U.S.A. Klaubauf et al., 2014

Magnaporthiopsis agrostidis Agrostis stolonifera Pathogen Australia Wong et al., 2015

Magnaporthiopsis cynodontis Agrostis sp., Cynodon sp., Festuca sp., Poa sp. Pathogen U.S.A. Vines et al., 2020

Magnaporthiopsis incrustans Poa pratensis, Poa annua, Festuca sp., Cynodon sp., Zoysia sp.

Magnaporthiopsis maydis Zea mays

Pathogen U.S.A. Landschoot and Jackson, 1989a; Luo and Zhang, 2013

Pathogen Egypt, Hungary, India, Israel, Portugal, Spain Klaubauf et al., 2014; Samra et al., 1963

continued )

TABLE 1.1. Species currently included in Magnaporthalesa

Taxa Hosts

Magnaporthaceae

Magnaporthiopsis meyeri-festucae

Agrostis sp., Poa annua, Festuca sp.

Magnaporthiopsis panicorum Panicum sp.

Magnaporthiopsis poae Agrostis sp., Festuca sp., Lolium perenne, Poa annua, Poa pratensis

Magnaporthiopsis rhizophila Cynodon dactylon, Panicum virgatum, Poa pratensis, Triticum aestivum

Nutritional modes Geographic locations Referencesb

Pathogen U.S.A. Luo et al., 2017

Unknown U.S.A. Luo et al., 2014

Pathogen China, U.S.A. Landschoot and Jackson, 1989b; Luo and Zhang 2013

Pathogen Australia, South Africa, U.S.A.

Muraeriata africana Bark or wood Saprotroph Kenya

Muraeriata collapsa Bark or wood Saprotroph U.S.A.

Luo and Zhang 2013; Scott and Deacon, 1983

Huhndorf et al., 2008

Huhndorf et al., 2008

Nakataea curvularioides Bromelia pinguin Unknown Cuba Arnold and Castañeda-Ruiz, 1987

Nakataea multiseptata Unidentified tree branches Unknown China Ma et al., 2018

Nakataea oryzae Oryza sp., Zizania sp., Echinochloa sp.

Pathogen Worldwide Luo and Zhang, 2013

Nakataea rarissima Byrsonima crassifolia Unknown Cuba Castañeda-Ruiz and Kendrick, 1990

Nakataea serpens Plant debris Unknown U.S.A. Shearer and Crane, 1979

Nakataea setulosa Unidentified tree branches Unknown China Ma et al., 2014

Neogaeumannomyces bambusicola

Unidentified bamboo Saprotroph Thailand Liu et al., 2015

Omnidemptus affinis Panicum effusum Pathogen Australia Cannon and Alcorn, 1994; HernándezRestrepo et al., 2019

Omnidemptus graminis Unidentified grass Unknown Spain Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2019

Omnidemptus lunatus Carpobrotus glaucescens Unknown Australia Hernández-Restrepo et al., 2019

Pseudophialophora angusta Dichanthelium acuminatum Unknown U.S.A. Luo et al., 2015c

Pseudophialophora dichanthii Dichanthelium acuminatum Unknown U.S.A. Luo et al., 2015c

Pseudophialophora eragrostis Eragrostis sp., Poaceae sp. Unknown U.S.A. Luo et al., 2014

Pseudophialophora magnispora Dichanthelium acuminatum Unknown U.S.A. Luo et al., 2015c

Pseudophialophora panicorum Panicum sp., Poaceae sp. Unknown U.S.A. Luo et al., 2014

Pseudophialophora schizachyrii Schizachyrium sp., Poaceae sp. Unknown U.S.A. Luo et al., 2014

(continued ) (continued )

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.