Santa Monica Mirror 1.10.20

Page 1

S A N TA M O N I C A

INSIDE Still Searching for Homeless Shelter Bomb Threat

REFLECTING THE CONCERNS OF THE COMMUNITY smmirror.com

PAGE 3

January 10 – 16, 2020 Volume XXII, Issue 25

Controversial Housing Bill SB 50 is Back Sen. Scott Wiener offers amended version of bill that would override local control for housing developments near transit and job hubs By S am C atanzaro A state bill that would override local zoning laws to allow mid-rise apartments to be constructed, including in some single-family neighborhoods, is up for consideration again by California lawmakers. Senate Bill 50 (SB 50), authored by Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) would, if passed, permit the development of four and five-story apartment buildings within half a mile of major transit corridors and job hubs, overriding any local laws that may prohibit such development from occurring in these areas.

Photo: LA Metro.

The Downtown Santa Monica Metro Expo Line station. A new bill going through the California legislature would override local control for the development of housing near major transit hubs.

The bill was shelved last legislative session after failing to pass through the Senate Appropriations Committee. The new version before state lawmakers includes an amendment giving local lawmakers a two-year window to develop individual housing plans for their jurisdictions. “These new amendments recognize that cities should have some flexibility in how they implement SB 50’s goals,” Wiener said in a state-

ment. “We’ve spent enormous time and energy speaking with and receiving feedback from a broad array of stakeholders, including local governments. We’ve heard loud and clear that cities want the flexibility to implement this kind of legislation in a way that works best for them.” Santa Monica Mayor Kevin McKeown said that while City Council has not yet taken a position on the amended version of SB 50, he personally opposes the legislation. “City staff is still analyzing the recycled SB50, and the Council has not taken a position. Personally, I continue to oppose the bill as written because it would destructively override Santa Monica’s thoughtful plan to encourage affordable housing production in places that would minimize impacts on existing neighborhoods and the dangers of displacement for existing residents. What we really need from Sacramento is funding to produce deed-restricted affordable housing for working families, low-wage individuals, and fixed-income seniors — not a bill to open the market-rate floodgates,” McKeown said. In April of last year, Los Angeles City Coun-

cil, led by Councilmember Paul Koretz who represents much of the Westside, voted 12-0 on a resolution opposing SB 50, the second year in a row they took such action. Koretz called the bill a “handout for developers” while fellow Westside Councilmember Mike Bonin expressed opposition citing fears of gentrification in his district. Under the amended version, local lawmakers would be required to zone for the maximum amount of housing allowed under the initial version SB 50 without concentrating construction of new housing in low-income neighborhoods and without increasing car trips. When reached for comment, Bonin’s office said the Councilmember was reviewing the amended version before taking a position. Local plans would be reviewed by the California Department of Housing and Community Development. If a local plan is rejected by the Department, the requirements of SB 50 would kick in. In order to become law this legislative session, SB 50 must pass the Senate Appropriations Committee and then the full Senate by the end of January.

‘They Were Powerless to Stop the City’ Plaintiffs in voting rights case file to appeals court By Sam Catanzaro Plaintiffs in a voting rights case against the City of Santa Monica have filed a brief reiterating their argument that the city’s at-large election system dilutes the voting power of Latino residents, asking an appeals court to uphold an earlier ruling calling for district elections. “The evidence showed that meaningful Latino candidates are overwhelmingly preferred by Latino voters, yet Latino candi-

dates almost always lose,” wrote plaintiff attorney Kevin Shenkman in an 82-page brief filed last month. “This lack of representation for Latinos, who are 16% of the city’s population and most concentrated in the city’s Pico neighborhood, meant they were powerless to stop the city from dissecting their community with a freeway and turning their home into the city’s toxic waste and trash dump site.” The plaintiffs, the Pico Neighborhood Association, filed the brief on December 27 in response to an opening brief filed by the City of Santa Monica in October in which

VOTE, see page 9 Sweet Home Santa Monica Dan & Charlee Nessel | 310.365.0195 | 310.755.8180 Dan@NesselHomes.com | Charlee@NesselHomes.com | NesselHomes.com

TAX

Lic# 01349526

Š2018 Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices California Properties is a member of the franchise system of BHH Affiliates LLC.

Lic# 01309674

01349526

Samuel Moses, CPA 100 Wilshire Blvd., Santa Monica

310.395.9922


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.