PHOTO/DENNIS MYERS
A Reno maintenance worker cleans a casino keno area while customers gamble.
New challenge to school grants A second lawsuit has been filed to overturn Nevada’s new school grant law, which pays parents to take their children out of public school and put them in private schools. One earlier suit was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada on behalf of several parents and a rabbi. It argues against the law on grounds that the Nevada Constitution bars the use of public school funds for sectarian purposes. The new lawsuit takes a different tack: “The education article of the Nevada Constitution expressly prohibits the use of public school funds for anything other than the operation of Nevada’s public schools.” It also argues that by draining the public school system of funds, students remaining in public school will be made to suffer the consequences, “consign[ing] Nevada’s most vulnerable and at-risk children to public school that will have even less funding—isolated by socioeconomic status, disability and academic need.” The suit further contends that the state would be supplying public school funding to schools without requiring them to meet the standards that public schools do. “They can refuse admission based on religious beliefs, ability to pay, and academic performance.” As a result, it claims, the state would be out of compliance with the Nevada Constitution’s requirement that school funding be used for “uniform schools.” The new state law is not available to all parents who send their children to private school, only to those parents who take their children out of public schools. Most grants are in the neighborhood of $5,000, which is not enough to pay for most private school tuitions in Nevada. As a result, critics argue that it basically a supplement to affluent parents who can already afford private school (“Working poor left behind,” RN&R, Aug. 13) and thus effectively redistributes public school funding to the affluent. The new lawsuit makes a similar contention, calling the law “a windfall to those who can already afford to send their children to private school. The $5,000 voucher subsidy is not enough to cover the full tuition at all but a handful of existing private schools in Nevada. Only the families with the means to make up the significant difference will be able to use the voucher subsidy.”
Goodbye, Beijing The Nevada Tourism Bureau in Beijing is shutting down after 11 years of operation because of friction between the foreign operator of the office and the state, according to state officials. Some reports said the shutdown is only temporary, but the Nevada Board of Examiners approved $52,062 to be used just in closing the office. The Beijinger reported, “The office was opened in Beijing in part to try to maintain Las Vegas’ appeal to Chinese travelers and gamblers, with closer options including Macau which expanded its licensing scheme in 2004, and Singapore which legalized gambling in 2005. Macau overtook Las Vegas as the world’s gambling capital in 2007. The Special Administrative Region generated USD 44 billion in gaming revenue in 2014—and that was during its first year-on-year drop in gambling growth since 2004. Las Vegas could boost its image with Chinese travelers, many of whom are now eligible for the recent streamlined, 10-year U.S. visa, and among those wishing to avoid the government scrutiny that an appearance in a Macau casino might generate.”
Quote of the week “I’m sorry; I cannot hold back a smile. There are a lot of good reasons for this [Iran] deal. But the best is that Cheney’s against it. I mean, think about this—the architect of the worst foreign policy decision in the history of America, to invade Iraq. Look what it has done. Why would anyone with any degree of intelligence agree with him?” –U.S. Sen. Harry Reid to CNN.
—Dennis Myers
8 | RN&R |
SEPTEMBER 17, 2015
Nothing statistical from the AGA suggested that housekeepers tend to move up into cage worker or casino management positions at any particular rate. The organization’s news release said it “is educating candidates about the industry and informing gaming employees about the candidates as they visit key early-vote and battleground states—which also happen to be casino states. AGA is compiling a voter guide to share with gaming employees—voters—ahead of caucuses and elections.” Its release was issued on Sept. 14, the same day that Republican presidential candidate Scott Walker chose Las Vegas to launch an attack on labor unions, including his announcement of plans to shut down the U.S. agency that oversees unfair labor practices and to put roadblocks in the way of union organizers.
Making it Do casino jobs provide a way into the middle class? The national gambling lobby is proselytizing among presidential candidates and voters the notion that casino jobs by are a route to the middle class. Dennis Myers In a press release, the American Gaming Association said that it “is inviting presidential candidates to demonstrate support for the industry that provides livelihoods for the very voters from whom they seek support.”
“Gaming offers an opportunity to earn above the U.S. average annual salary.” American Gaming Association Earlier this year the AGA released a document that argued casino careers provide “hundreds of thousands of high-quality jobs to workers from diverse backgrounds with wide-ranging levels of job experience and areas of expertise. With salaries comparable to—or above—the national average and organizations dedicated to growing employee talents and responsibilities, the gaming industry serves as a gateway to the middle class.” However, the document, produced by Oxford Economics, wasn’t really a study and didn’t provide data that made a case for casino jobs taking workers into
the middle class. Rather, it mainly argued that they do, as with this text: “For many U.S. workers, gaming offers an opportunity to earn above the U.S. average annual salary. Middle-class gaming jobs include: Frontline casino employees, including cage workers and dealers, who make an average annual salary of more than $47,000, including tips; casino management and administration professionals, who earn an average of almost $54,000 annually; and gaming equipment manufacturing workers, who earn an average annual salary of nearly $75,000.” But again, there was no data to show how common it was for workers to eventually move into those kinds of positions. It was public relations, not analysis. Nor are there independent studies that make that case. The AGA provided a prepared statement from senior vice president Sara Rayme that made the point: “We’re proud to provide a path to the middle class for workers of all backgrounds and experiences, and we especially recognize the one-in-five gaming employees who are Latinos as we celebrate Hispanic Heritage Month and International Housekeepers Week. As candidates seek support from Latino voters, we invite them to meet with our diverse workforce and gain a better understanding of how the casino gaming industry works.”
Workplace conditions Walker’s principal—though not only—target on that day was public workers’ unions, but it was a reminder that if casino jobs are a way into the middle class, they need a lot of help from unions. A 2000 University of Nevada, Las Vegas study indicated that wages of casino workers in Washoe County—where few casino workers are unionized—lagged far below those in Clark County, where unions are a significant force. “If the experience of Washoe County’s [casino] industry is the norm for wages in the nonunion service sector occupations, then wages in an expanding sector of the economy will certainly be under or hover around commonly accepted measures of poverty for a growing proportion of workers,” UNLV economics professor Jeff Waddoups wrote. Waddoups’ study, drawn from data gathered by the Nevada Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation, found a 24 percent difference between average Clark County casino worker wages and their Washoe counterparts. At the time of his study, 1.5 percent of Washoe casino workers were union members compared to 29 percent at Clark casinos. His data also found that non-union workers in Clark County benefited from the impact of unionism because non-union employers had to compete for workers. “The union sets the standard, and it’s a powerful enough force in the labor market here that if the non-union properties want to get the same quantity or quality of labor, they
