Aerospace Industry
Interstellar mission with plastics Space technology is adopting plastics in spacecrafts, owing to its light weight and cost-efficient value, as well as being a hardliner against cosmic hazards, says Angelica Buan.
T
he US is a trailblazer in space technology, having the world’s largest space programme. It has a hefty budget, too. For the current fiscal year, the US government is channelling an estimated US$18.5 billion to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to undertake its latest projects, which covers the Space Launch System, among others. These billion-dollar expeditions, however, don’t always get the green light. There are considerations like practicality and affordability that are crucial to space flight projects. Hence, light weight is a virtue for cost savings. The drift is that lighter crafts can have smaller, more efficient engines and less fuel. Aluminium has been favoured for space craft because it is light. Yet, space technology continues to seek new materials that can provide high performance properties while reducing the weight and costs of building modern space crafts. Plastic, for now, is a right fit for these criteria on weight, cost and safety of space travel. Polymeric space flight Plastic bags, which are being banned in many countries, hold a key for safer intergalactic space missions! The vital resin used to make most plastic bags and containers, polyethylene (PE), is the basis of space crafts to provide space crew with a better shielding from cosmic radiation, than aluminium space crafts would. NASA scientists have invented a PE-based material called RXF1 that is claimed to be three times stronger, yet more than twice lighter, as well as 50% and 15% more effective as a barrier against solar flares and cosmic rays, respectively, compared to aluminium. Nasser Barghouty, Project Scientist for NASA's Space Radiation Shielding Project at the Marshall Space Flight Centre, says that plastic-like materials produce far less "secondary radiation" than heavier materials like aluminium or lead. Secondary radiation comes from the shielding material itself, and is worse for astronauts’ health than space radiation.
26
MAY 2016
Particles from space radiation, as they collide into atoms within the shield, trigger tiny nuclear reactions that produce a shower of nuclear by-products, neutrons and other particles that enter the spacecraft. Heavier elements like lead produce much more secondary radiation than lighter elements like carbon and hydrogen. PE is composed entirely of lightweight carbon and hydrogen atoms, which thus minimises secondary radiation. Shielding project researcher Raj Kaul states that RXF1 is a ballistic shield that can deflect micrometeorites; and since it is a fabric, it can be draped around moulds and shaped into specific spacecraft components.
NASA could shield spacecrafts from cosmic rays with PEbased material, RXF1
Currently, further work and research are on-going to make the material flame and temperature-resistant. Meanwhile, the scientists do not guarantee that the material is 100% impenetrable, especially since some galactic cosmic rays are so energetic and no amount of shielding can stop them. However, their initial studies suggest that RXF1 could provide adequate shielding for a 30-month mission to the planet Mars. PE-brick home on Mars Space-trotters will welcome the idea of travelling light, but in consideration of safety, they cannot do away with equipment that is required to protect them from radiation.