Adaptive Reuse and Repositioning - Pelli Clarke & Partners

Page 1

Adaptive Reuse and Repositioning

Advancing beyond restoration; reorienting the built environment architectural excellence

Advancing beyond restoration; reorienting the built environment architectural excellence

New Haven, Main Office

Pelli Clarke & Partners

1056 Chapel Street New Haven, CT 06510

T: 203.777.2515

F: 203.787.2856

InfoNH@pcparch.com

New York

Pelli Clarke & Partners

322 8th Avenue, 11th Floor New York, NY 10001

T: 212.417.9496

F: 212.417.9497

InfoNYC@pcparch.com

Shanghai

692 Yongjia Rd, Bld 2, Rm 401 Xuhui District, Shanghai, 210000

T: 86 21 636 0530 jzhang@pcparch.com

Shenzhen

2002-2003, China Resources Land Building Tower D 19 Kefa Road Nanshan District, Shenzhen China info_sz@pcparch.com

Tokyo

Lexington Plaza, Nishi-Gotanda 3F

5-2-4 Nishi-Gotanda, Shinagawa-ku Tokyo, 41-0031 Japan

5 Introduction Adaptive Reuse and Repositioning Experience 6 Brookfield Place Reconfiguration and Entry Pavilion 22 Alexander Court 36 475 Park Avenue South 48 B-Link 56 Shanghai Plaza 62 Goldring/Woldenberg Business Complex, A.B. Freeman School of Business, Tulane University 74 The Art of Collaboration 76 The Practice and Principals 78 Sustainability Awards 82 Select Awards Contents

Pelli Clarke & Partners has recently completed several repositioning projects that have reimagined and revitalized existing buildings to not only accommodate new, more relevant uses, but also to contribute to their communities in a more sustainable, responsive and responsible way. Repositioning creates critical added long-term value through attracting and retaining sustained economic activity.

Repositioning Office Buildings to Create the Workplace of the Future

Over the last decade, a young and connected generation brought new ways of working to business and with it, demands for new ways of thinking about workplace design. These changes only accelerated in the past two years.

Employees are now asking: What are the options for how our teams work? Where will they do their best work? Employees are also questioning what benefits physical offices provide. Why spend time and money commuting? The answer lies in collaboration and the role of the physical workplace as an incubator for innovation, facilitator for networking, and platform for culture-building. More so than ever before, top talent is demanding spaces that promote wellness. Future workspaces provide areas of mental and physical wellness, in turn, inspiring employees to recharge. The world is experiencing paradigmatic shifts in workplace design, which creates an opportunity for strategic and innovative repositioning of existing office buildings to meet new demands for programming, embedded technology and support spaces.

Reshaping the Public Realm for a Live-Work-Play Lifestyle

As buildings are reimagined to better suit current and future needs, public spaces are re-envisioned to better address and integrate into their surrounding communities. These spaces including courtyards, atriums, and gardens, are extensions of the workplace and the community, so we design them for easy accessibility, collaboration and organic gathering, creating an inviting, engaging, and vibrant public realm.

Advancing ESG Initiatives through Revitalization

Repositioning presents the opportunity to reshape existing buildings to become better citizens of their communities and better support the people they serve. The built environment generates close to 50% of the world’s annual C02 emissions with new construction and materials accounting for 20% of that amount. Therefore, the option to reuse and repurpose existing buildings is both a responsible and sustainable undertaking.

Through re-purposing, cores and systems are more energy efficient, exterior enclosures are enhanced, all while reducing embodied carbon and landfill debris, lessening their social and environmental impact when compared to demolition and new construction. Enhanced efficiency and flexibility leads to a critical increase in long-term value and revenue, supporting the effort to modernize existing structures for current and future needs.

The following projects demonstrate how new potential uses and program were implemented, prompting re-invention that responds to both current market and community needs. They are intensive building interventions that are not just upgrades but transformations.

Introduction

Brookfield Place

Reconfiguration and Entry Pavilion

Location New York, New York, USA

Client Brookfield Properties

Size 500,000 sq. ft. (Reconfiguration)

10,000 sq. ft. (Pavilion and Connector)

Completion

2020 (Reconfiguration)

2013 (Pavilion)

Firm Role

Design Architect

Working closely with Brookfield Properties, Pelli Clarke & Partners was the overall Master Planner and Design Architect for this extensive renovation that included new construction for the Pavilion. The Pavilion and Reconfiguration together span over 500,000 square feet of additions and renovated spaces to Brookfield Place (formerly the World Financial Center), an existing 8.2 million square foot commercial office and retail center in Lower Manhattan originally designed by Pelli Clarke & Partners and completed in 1988.

This ambitious project redesigns the two base floors in their entirety for a completely new public experience, starting with a new entrance. A glass pavilion on West Street is the main entrance for the entire complex, connecting Brookfield Place to Lower Manhattan’s new transit hubs. Visitors arriving from the new World Trade Center PATH station and the Fulton Center subway complex will go from the underground pedestrian passageways directly to the entrance pavilion and through to the Winter Garden. Passengers from the Hudson River ferries will also use the entrance pavilion to reach public transit. The reorganization of entries and public spaces, including new access from Vesey Street and the Battery Park Marina, accommodate the changing conditions and needs of the surrounding Battery Park City neighborhood.

The Winter Garden is surrounded by a new mix of uses, enlivening the grand public space while retaining its signature grand stair. Improvements to the base curtain wall bring more daylight into the building and improve views. The reconfiguration is part of a larger redevelopment of the landmark New York office complex that includes a new retail corridor, outdoor dining along the Hudson River, and a new food marketplace.

Sustainable features resulted from cost- saving architectural and mechanical integrations, including a new and extensive network of radiant floor heating and cooling, high- performance curtainwall elements, and energy efficient lighting. Brookfield Place has remained in full operation during the entire construction period, which began in 2012.

6
8
The Winter Garden Atrium, along with the rest of the World Financial Center, was originally connected to the World Trade Center via a 400 ft (120 m) pedestrian bridge that spanned West Street.
9

After the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11, the area around the site underwent a significant transformation. In the years that followed, a number of temporary structures were built to serve as retail and commercial spaces, while the plans for the permanent reconstruction of the site were being developed.

12

In the aftermath of 9/11, the Winter Garden suffered extensive damage and the front face of the building was completely destroyed. In the years that followed, the building underwent a number of temporary renovations including the replacement of the front face with a series of large windows facing the former site of the World Trade Center.

The decision to replace the front face of the Winter Garden with windows was made as part of an effort to provide a symbol of resilience and hope in the wake of the tragedy. The installation of the windows not only served as a tribute to the fallen towers but also provided a poignant reminder of the ongoing recovery and reconstruction efforts.

13

After the destruction of the pedestrian bridge that connected the World Financial Center and the World Trade Center in the 9/11 attacks, there was a need to provide a safe and convenient connection between the two sites. The decision to move the connection under West Street to the new Brookfield Pavilion was made as part of the overall redevelopment plan for the World Trade Center site.

Working closely with the structural engineers, the goal was to create a unique and visually striking structure that would provide openness and transparency while still maintaining structural integrity in the centrally located columns. The solution came in the form of a “basket” structure, consisting of interlocking steel components that form a complex web of intersecting lines. This design allowed for a lightweight and efficient structural system that maximizes transparency and minimizes visual obstruction. The component pieces of the structure were created and fabricated in Canada, with precision and attention to detail to ensure a seamless integration of all parts. The end result is a stunning pavilion that not only meets its functional requirements but also serves as a work of art that is appreciated by all who visit it.

14
15

Original Ground Floor Plan

To continue the pattern of renewal, the design team also worked extensively to replace, and upgrade the dated, heavy glass entrances with modern, sleek and energy-efficient facades.

The new glass entrances were created using a state-of-the-art technology that provides excellent thermal insulation, reduces glare, and minimizes UV radiation. This not only creates a more comfortable environment for visitors and employees but also helps to reduce the center’s energy consumption and lower its carbon footprint.

16
New Ground Floor Plan showing the new Brookfield Pavilion entrance along with areas of updated architecture
225 Liberty Street
250 Vesey Street
17
The Brookfield Courtyard Tower Four at Brookfield Place before (left) and after (right).
18
Brookfield Place interior before (left) and after (right). Light pours in throughout, an ever-changing world of shadows and sun throughout the day.
19
225 Liberty Street before (left) and after (right).

Location

Washington, DC, USA

Client

Rockrose

Size

200,000 sq. ft. / 18,580 sq. m. (Addition)

Completion

2018

Certification

LEED CS Gold

Firm Role

Design Architect

Alexander Court is an urban Trophy Class office complex in the core of Washington DC’s Central Business District, which repositions two existing office buildings, 2001 K Street and 2000 L Street, where the latter was nearing the end of its lifespan. Transformed by a four-story vertical addition, new façade cladding, and interior finishes for 2000 L Street, Alexander Court provides gracious new public spaces for tenants. A new central lobby, mezzanine, and an iconic 12-story atrium physically and aesthetically unify the two buildings. The development features improvements to the overall vertical transportation systems, new storefronts, canopies and interior finishes.

Collectively, the two-story lobby, mezzanine, atrium, and adjacent spaces are redesigned as one coherent entry sequence. The centerpiece of the project is a reconfigured, expansive two-story lobby at the corner of 20th & L Streets, which transitions into the atrium and continues into the former main K Street building entry. This grand lobby is articulated on the exterior with an open and inviting appearance that welcomes visitors and tenants.

The atrium creates a vertical, sunlit spine between the existing K Street and L Street buildings and features a uniform wood fin element, functioning within the 12-story space as a part of the project’s daylight control system, which further transitions into both the K and L Street entrance lobbies, forming a solid wood ceiling. The floor and feature walls in the main lobby areas are covered primarily with dimensional stone. The diagonal lines, splitting the large surfaces of the walls into multiple, lit sections, are introduced to reflect a similar approach used on the exterior façade. These design components unify the entire public space located at different levels of the complex and mediate different aesthetics between the old and new.

The reconfigured exterior is expressed as a series of slanted, interweaving masses breaking the 400-foot long L Street façade into floor-to-ceiling, high performance, glassy components, juxtaposing smooth and textured surfaces. This expression, together with the east and west projections and upper floor setbacks, conceals the building’s mass, while revealing an architectural scale more consistent with neighboring structures. The vertical mass is divided into smaller scale sections composed of a base, middle and top that alter the perception of the building’s overall height from the street. The rooftop conference center and terrace provide open views of the National Cathedral to the northwest.

Alexander Court
22
23

Existing Existing

Alexander Court’s repositioning was carefully phased to allow for tenant occupancy throughout the process.

A four-story vertical addition and new cladding for 2000 L Street provide gracious new public spaces for tenants, including an iconic, twelve-story glass atrium.

1. Existing Conditions 5. Carving Massing for Terraces & Private Spaces 2. Removing Existing Facade 6. Pushing out and away facade for emphasis
24
Delivered Delivered
3. Increasing & Opening Entry Set-Back 7. Create connected atrium space to buildings 4. Adding 4 Floors
25
8. Current Delivery

The new face of Alexander Court, juxtaposing smooth and textured surfaces, is contemporary, inviting and tenant friendly.

26
27
ORIGINAL GROUND FLOOR
LOBBY/ PUBLIC SPACES
ORIGINAL SECOND FLOOR By re-imagining the ground floor experience and adding connectivity, the two- story lobby, mezzanine, atrium, and adjacent spaces are redesigned as one coherent entry sequence.
28
Existing Ground Floor Conditions/Connections NEW GROUND FLOOR
LOBBY/ PUBLIC SPACES
NEW SECOND FLOOR
29
Current Alexander Court Lobby
30
Existing Lobby Conditions, the second floor of the building was removed for a larger, connected mezzanine space and addition of the connected atrium.
31
32
33
34
The reconfigured exterior is expressed as a series of slanted, interweaving masses breaking the 400- foot long L Street façade into smaller scale sections of floor to ceiling high performance glassy components. This approach to the façade treatment also orients the roof common spaces to allow for north-west open views of the National Cathedral.
35

Location

New York, NY, USA

Client

Cohen Brothers Realty Corporation

Size

170,000 sq. ft. / 15,794 sq. m.

Completion

2018

Firm Role

Design Architect

Pelli Clarke & Partners recently reimagined 475 Park Avenue South, a premier Midtown South office tower. The building’s previous envelope was failing due to age and required a recladding. Adding to the complexity of the project, construction was carefully phased to allow tenant occupancy throughout the process. The building was reclad from the outside with the previous windows remaining intact during the week while the offices were in use; over the weekends, the windows were replaced while the building was unoccupied. Texture was added to the new façade with an innovative use of only six patterns of frit on glass, creating a graphic that added design interest in a cost-effective manner. The new curtain wall provided thermal performance and increased sustainability of the building, a driving factor in attracting new tenants.

475 Park Avenue South
36

ORIGINAL BUILDING DESIGNED BY SHREVE, LAMB & HARMON IN 1969

ORIGINAL BUILDING DESIGNED BY SHREVE, LAMB & HARMON

RE-CLAD OF TOWER WITH FRITTED GLASS CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM

RE-CLAD OF TOWER WITH FRITTED GLASS CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM

RE-CLAD OF LOW-RISE AND CHAMFERS WITH METAL PANEL CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM

RE-CLAD OF LOW-RISE AND CHAMFERS WITH METAL PANEL CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM

RE-CLAD OF STOREFRONT WITH STAINLESS STEEL AND GLASS FIN SYSTEM

RE-CLAD OF STOREFRONT WITH STAINLESS STEEL AND GLASS FIN SYSTEM

Original Building Designed by Shreve, Lamb & Harmon in 1969 Re-Clad of Storefront with Stainless Steel and Glass Fin System Re-Clad of Low-Rise and Chamfers with Metal Panel Curtain Wall System
SYSTEM
Re-Clad of Tower with Fritted Glass Curtain Wall System
38
39
Re-Clad by Pelli Clarke & Partners completed in 2015
40
Re-Clad of Tower with Fritted Glass Curtain Wall System
475 PARK AVE SOUTH RE-CLADDING WITH NEW CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM SPANDRAL GLASS LOW IRON IGU WITH LOW-E COATING EXISTING WINDOWS REMAINING IN PLACE DURING CURTAN WALL INSTALLATION VISION GLASS LOW IRON IGU WITH LOW-E COATING 475 PARK AVE SOUTH RE-CLADDING WITH NEW CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM COMPLETED IN 2015 SPANDRAL GLASS LOW IRON MONOLITHIC GLASS WITH CUSTOM FRIT AND CUSTOM FLOOD COAT EXISTING WINDOWS REMOVED FROM INSIDE, INTERIOR TRIM PANEL ADDED SOLAR SHADING ROLLER SCREEN VISION GLASS LOW IRON IGU WITH LOW-E COATING 475 PARK AVE SOUTH ORIGINAL BUILDING AS DESIGNED BY SHREVE, LAMB & HARMAN IN 1965 METAL PANEL OPERABLE WINDOWS WITH METAL FRAMES BRICK CLADDING AT PIERS 475 PARK AVE SOUTH DURING CONSTRUCTION BRICK CLADDING REMOVED AT PIERS, INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY WATER-PROOFING MEMBRANE 475 PARK AVE SOUTH RE-CLADDING WITH NEW CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM SPANDRAL GLASS LOW IRON IGU WITH LOW-E COATING EXISTING WINDOWS REMAINING IN PLACE DURING CURTAN WALL INSTALLATION VISION GLASS LOW IRON IGU WITH LOW-E COATING 475 PARK AVE SOUTH RE-CLADDING WITH NEW CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM COMPLETED IN 2015 SPANDRAL GLASS LOW IRON MONOLITHIC GLASS WITH CUSTOM FRIT AND CUSTOM FLOOD COAT EXISTING WINDOWS REMOVED FROM INSIDE, INTERIOR TRIM PANEL ADDED SOLAR SHADING ROLLER SCREEN VISION GLASS LOW IRON IGU WITH LOW-E COATING Metal Panel Vision Glass Low Iron IGU with Low-E Coating Solar Shading Roller Screen Vision Glass Low Iron IGU with Low-E Coating Existing windows removed from inside, interior trim panel added Spandral Glass Low Iron Monolithic Glass with Custom Frit and Custom Flood Coat Spandral Glass Low Iron IGU with Low-E Coating Existing Windows remaining in place during curtain wall installation Operable Windows with Metal Frames Brick Cladding at Piers Brick Cladding Removed at Piers, Installation of Temporary Water-Proofing Membrane 41
42
43
44
Re-Clad of Storefront with Stainless Steel and Glass Fin System
45

In the B-Link, the old and new design elements come together in a complementary duality of interconnected interdependent architectural spaces and materials that support the campus vision. This vision combines the creation of innovative technologies supported on a foundation of manufacturing history to creating an integrated whole. Historic shapes and materials are combined with new shapes and materials so that a Ying and Yang design philosophy creates a complete whole.

The existing steel fabrication facility provides a rich environment that forms the foundation for the “old” design inspiration. The design of B-Link pulls inspiration from the memory of place utilizing existing structures, existing spatial forms, existing façade materials, and left-over manufacturing “relics” scattered throughout the property. These elements will be reconditioned and restored and then integrated selectively into the design concept.

A story of design progression will unfold to create a narrative that starts with the old architecture and progresses towards a newer architectural expression. The historic fabric will be most expressive on the East Campus. The Central Campus will contain mostly facades with historic materials incorporated into more modern façade articulation. And finally the West Campus will contain buildings with new innovative interpretations of the historic facades using new materials and contemporary massing and shapes. Just as the new and old are expressed across B-Link, so will they be combined onto individual facades at points where old structures and new structures come together.

B-Link
Location Shanghai, China Client Baoland Size 5,047,574 sq. ft. / 468,935 sq. m. Completion 2018 Firm Role Design Architect 48

Complementing the old design elements, new architectural shapes, spaces, and materials will be introduced into the campus standing in unison and balance with the existing. These new interventions will add vitality and creativity to the foundation, history, and memory of the existing architectural expression.

50
51
52
53

Location

Shanghai, China

Client

Collab (Shanghai) Real Estate Co., Ltd

Hualing Group

Metro Holdings Limited

Sunac China Holdings Limited

Size

390,000 sq. ft. / 36,129 sq. m.

Completion

2020

Firm Role

Design Architect

Situated at a prominent corner along the renowned Huaihai Avenue, Shanghai Plaza is one of the first retail destinations in the metropolis. With its debut in 1997 as a department store, it was subsequently renovated in 2005 into a mall, but has fallen into disrepair in recent years.

The renovation effort not only intends to update the property’s physical look, but also aspires to reinvigorate its programmatic makeup to reflect current socio-economic needs . While retail was kept at ground and second levels, coworking was introduced to occupy the upper three floors as Wework’s Asia flagship. The new mixed-use program across floors offers a tremendous opportunity for a symbiotic relationship between office and retail in close proximity, as well as presenting a challenge of unifying disparate functions into one coherent community.

The concept of the Plaza originates from large outdoor spaces that become vibrant urban commercial and cultural centers. The renovation design revisits and revives the urbanistic nature of Shanghai Plaza, and by breaking the boundaries between the indoor and outdoor, and strengthening interactions across floors, creates a cohesive microcosm with distilled urban values.

Shanghai Plaza
56
58
59

Goldring/Woldenberg Business Complex, A.B. Freeman

School of Business, Tulane University

Location New Orleans, LA, USA

Client

A.B. Freeman School of Business is comprised of two buildings, Goldring/ Woldenberg Hall I and Hall II, located on McAlister Drive, a busy pedestrian path in the heart of Tulane University’s campus. Pelli Clarke & Partners’ design unifies the two buildings into one academic complex with a new 4,180-square-meter (45,000-square-foot) four- story addition and a 3,716-square-meter (40,000-square-foot) renovation of a classroom, two auditoriums, and two lecture halls.

Inspired by Tulane’s mascot, the Wave, and with respect to the large oak trees lining McAlister Drive, the scalloped pattern of the four- story glass curtainwall entrance activates, and at night illuminates, both the outside courtyard and central atrium inside, becoming a vibrant gathering place for students throughout the day and evening.

Openness and transparency permeate PC&P’s design, with two multilevel, glass, drum- shaped classrooms situated at opposite ends of the three- story atrium, accessible by ramps. Flexible classrooms, an incubator space for student start- ups, expanded breakout stations, a new financial analysis lab, and administrative offices are enclosed with glass doors, emphasizing visibility and approachability to enhance community learning and collaboration.

Tulane
sq. ft. / 8,547 sq. m.
University Size 92,091
62
Firm Role Design Architect Completion 2018
The renovation and expansion of the Goldring/Woldenberg Business Complex transforms the Freeman’s two central buildings — built seventeen years apart with different floor-tofloor heights — into a vibrant center for collaboration and study.
64
Existing Buildings
Generic Massing Facade articulated Final Massing 2 5
Facade articulated Massing placed within existing Heritage trees and context. 3 6 Final Massing Edge of building shaped around canopy of Heritage trees. 2 5
Facade articulated Massing placed within existing Heritage trees and context. 3 6 Final Massing Edge of canopy of Heritage trees. Massing placed within existing Heritage trees and context 1 2 4 5 Internal stairs/circulation organized around geometry of facade. Facade articulated Generic massing Massing placed within existing Heritage trees and context. 3 6 1 2 4 5 Internal stairs/circulation organized around geometry of facade. Facade articulated Generic massing Massing placed within existing Heritage trees and context. 3 6 Final Edge Edge of building shaped around canopy of Heritage trees Internal stairs/ciculation organized around geometry of facade 1 2 4 5 Internal stairs/circulation organized around geometry of facade. Generic massing 3 6 Final Massing Edge of building shaped around canopy of Heritage trees. 65
facade.
facade.

The new complex is nestled within a grove of heritage live oaks and features ten glass-walled classrooms, twenty faculty offices, more than thirty collaborative areas, a financial analysis lab, and a new-venture incubator. Inspired by the live oaks’ sweeping forms, the building’s four-story glass curtain undulates in curves that evoke waves — a visual connection to Tulane’s beloved Green Wave.

68
The main atrium is open and transparent, fully visible from the courtyard leading to the main entrance, from the corridors and stairway that run its full length, and the glass drum-like multi-story classroom structure at the southern end of the building.
69
70
The Goldring/Woldenberg Business Complex is a testament to how new architecture can be seamlessly integrated with existing structures to create a dynamic and engaging community space.

Natural light permeates throughout the building and reinforces the clean, white tones of student-study areas, providing an uplifting academic experience.

71

Approach to Design

The Design Process

At the heart of Pelli Clarke & Partners’ (PC&P’s) long success is an intensive and highly collaborative approach to designing buildings, one that ensures each new project is uniquely suited to its purposes.

While the firm has won many prestigious design awards, it has done so not by espousing a signature style, but rather by consistently practicing the art of collaboration with clients, with consultants, and within the office itself. By remaining receptive to the special possibilities of each new commission, the firm has created an approach to design in which the best ideas are free to emerge. As a result, the architecture is richer, more resonant, and often because it is not predetermined surprising.

In part, the Pelli Clarke & Partners design process is about getting to know the client about listening to their needs and desires and learning about what makes them unique. It is also about maintaining a work environment that fosters a productive degree of freedom and creativity. Yet, to yield reliable results, a design project must be conducted systematically, and so over the course of its 39-year history, PC&P has created an approach to design that balances openness with structure.

The firm intentionally limits the number of new commissions it accepts each year, assuring that the Senior Principals Cesar Pelli, Fred Clarke, and Rafael Pelli can give their full attention to each project. To support them, consistent teams of architects are dedicated to a project for its full duration, simplifying the lines of communication and fostering a reliable knowledge base for every project. The firm also adheres to and, in fact, often innovates— industry standards of project management, from the integration of new technologies like Building Information Modeling (BIM) to the adoption of new forms of project delivery. This combination of creativity and skill, of freedom and structure, is what allows Pelli Clarke & Partners to consistently produce award-winning buildings that are highly functional, accessible, on-schedule, and on-budget.

Before embarking on a design, Pelli Clarke & Partners endeavors to learn as much as possible about a project, including the client’s needs and aspirations, the opportunities of the building site, and the technical requirements of the program. Thus the first phase of the design process is analytical. Some of the research is technical and conducted by the firm’s extended team of consultants everything from the geotechnical conditions of the site to the local regulatory context is reviewed and understood, ensuring that the givens of the project are well defined before the design work starts.

An equal effort is put into understanding a client’s unique corporate culture. This understanding often starts to emerge during the architect selection process, but once selected, Pelli Clarke & Partners starts afresh. A roster of information-gathering tasks is developed, including interviews with a building’s future users, surveys and questionnaires of the same, and visits to the site and the existing facilities. The firm also leads public design “charrettes” with a client’s extended community meetings at which project stakeholders can draw and model ideas for the new building.

This analytical process sometimes referred to as “PreDesign” varies from project to project and is developed with the input of a client’s representatives so that it is appropriate to their needs. In a sense, designing the Pre-Design phase can be considered a part of the design process itself, because decisions made during Pre-Design can be very influential on the emerging building design.

As part of this early work, a schedule of meetings is laid out for the entire design and construction process. Regular meetings both electronic and face-to-face are the backbone of a successful building project, and typically include representatives of the client, various user groups, the construction manager, and relevant technical consultants.

It is in these meetings that much of the collaborative effort takes place. PC&P works to ensure that all concerns and ideas are given a voice, always mindful that good ideas can emerge from unexpected places.

Art of Collaboration
74

Managing Budgets and Schedules

Once the information-gathering process is complete, Pelli Clarke & Partners starts to design a project in earnest. The process is highly iterative; that is, multiple solutions are examined for every element of the project. Internal design reviews are held nearly every day to review the options. Some options are immediately seen as successful, while others are clearly not. Many have both good and bad qualities and are sent back for revision. The designers work in a variety of media, from hand sketches and physical models to drawings and digital renderings produced from the latest architectural software, including AutoCAD, Sketchup, Rhino, and 3D Max. We also use Parametric and Building Information Modeling software tools, like Grasshopper, Revit, and Digital Project/CATIA. The goal is to spark an engaging discussion about what sort of architecture should emerge. At regular points, several design options are prepared and a presentation is made to the client, so that they too can participate in the discussion.

As the design process advances, the architects and their consultants structural and mechanical engineers, lighting and landscape designers start to solve specific architectural problems and determine the exact character, details, and materials of the building. Drawings are developed that will eventually become the contract documents. In-house meetings become more frequent, and models and renderings are more numerous and detailed, focusing on the major spaces.

Throughout the process, PC&P typically seeks the input of a construction manager to help determine the constructability and cost implications of the emerging design. The final step in the process is a formal presentation of models of every major interior and exterior component of the project. A final cost estimate is developed, and the design is refined until the client and the architects are satisfied that it is achievable. For many projects, Pelli Clarke & Partners collaborates with an Architect of Record who manages the project’s technical documentation and construction administration. As that firm takes the lead in the later stages of the design process, PC&P helps to review construction documents, issue design clarifications, and act as a reference and resource for the technical delineation of the project. Once the project begins construction, representatives of each consultant firm regularly meet to review the progress of their particular discipline.

An essential part of successful project management is the effective super vision of a project’s budget and schedule; without it, the loftier work of designing a building is for naught. Like all of the other technical elements of a project, Pelli Clarke & Partners sees the schedule and budget, first, as givens that must be respected and, second, as potential sources for innovation.

With this in mind, PC&P integrates cost planning and control into the entire design process, starting with the Pre-Design Phase. Nearly forty years of experience has shown the firm that certain design approaches are inherently more expensive than others and that the most critical point of control is at the outset. Once the design is under way, its cost implications are tested repeatedly, usually with the support of a cost estimator and the construction manager. By avoiding unrealistic designs at the outset, risks are minimized, and the best design can be shepherded through the construction process on-budget.

A similar approach is employed when it comes to a project’s schedule. Because the schedule fundamentally affects the budget and because buildings are often commissioned with an opening date in mind adhering to the schedule is central to a project’s success. Here, experience is the key, because with it, realistic expectations can be set. Once the ball is rolling, PC&P will often work on several aspects of the design at once, utilizing multiple in-house design teams, outside consultants, and construction managers, all working in tandem.

75

Since our founding in 1977, Pelli Clarke & Partners has earned a reputation for designing buildings that express the core values of our clients. We have had the honor of designing many of the world’s most recognizable buildings, including the World Financial Center in New York (1988), the Petronas Towers in Malaysia (1999), and the International Finance Center in Hong Kong (2004). Our award-winning portfolio includes academic buildings, libraries, museums, research centers, residences, and master plans, and we have served private clients, businesses, institutions, and government agencies. The broad sweep of our work is a result of the belief that a firm must not be constrained by a signature style, but rather, great design arises from sincere collaboration with a client and a deep respect for a project’s environmental, economic, and social contexts.

Pelli Clarke & Partners structures its practice to realize the highest standard of design and service. We carefully limit the number of commissions we accept, allowing Key Design Principals to always be fully engaged on every project at every phase. Further, we organize the firm into small studios, assuring that a consistent team of architects is dedicated to a project from planning through construction. We have built strong relationships with the world’s best technical consultants, and to support our intensive and collaborative process, we continually integrate the most effective design and communication technologies into our practice. Our experience has taught us that achieving excellence in design is only possible when the technical, budgetary, and schedule constraints of a project are clearly recognized and skillfully managed.

Pelli Clarke & Partners strives to design buildings that are contemporary, broadly resonant, and optimistic. We see architecture as a continually evolving art that can express the hopeful aspirations of our shared culture. In designing our projects, we draw on architecture’s rich history, on evolving technologies, and on the partnerships we build with our clients. We have been honored with critical acclaim and hundreds of design awards, including the American Institute of Architects’ two most prestigious awards, the Firm Award and the Gold Medal, for Cesar Pelli. In 2004, the firm was awarded the Aga Khan Award for Architecture for the design of the Petronas Towers.

76
The Practice and Principals
77

Pelli Clarke & Partners is one of the world’s leading designers of environmentally sustainable projects. The firm’s buildings are routinely certified by the US Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) program, including at the Platinum level, the highest distinction. The firm’s notable green projects include The Verdesian in New York City (2008), the world’s first LEED Platinum residential tower, and the Owens Corning World Headquarters in Toledo, Ohio (1996), which was awarded a retroactive LEED certification because it was completed before the rating system existed.

Pelli Clarke & Partners’ achievements in sustainable design may come as a surprise to those who expect green buildings to look a certain way or to be designed by architects who expressly characterize their work as “green.” But Pelli Clarke & Partners sees sustainability more holistically than that: it is one element among many in a design project, embedded in a web of technical, environmental, economic, and cultural phenomena.

Because of this, the firm has taught itself to embrace an overall ethic of sustainability, aiming to minimize a project’s impact at all scales and in every circumstance, including site planning, building massing, daylighting, material selection, building systems, and the means and methods of construction. This ethic extends beyond the merely technical aspects of green design, however. Pelli Clarke & Partners believes that sustainability is also about making buildings that are accessible, affordable, durable, and culturally sensitive. After all, an unsuccessful design whether functionally, economically, or even aesthetically is the most unsustainable thing of all.

Ultimately, sustainable design requires a strong commitment and collaborative effort from the entire design team, including the client and the builder. Pelli Clarke & Partners has become well known for establishing such cooperative and enduring working relationships. The firm’s creative process brings together the technical knowledge and expertise of architects, landscape designers, engineers, and sustainability consultants who jointly achieve an integrated and functional design that balances program requirements with the goals of sustainability.

Sustainable Design 78
79

Sustainability Awards

LEED Platinum

Salesforce Tower

San Francisco, CA

Eighteen King Wah Road

Hong Kong, China

Godrej One, Mumbai, India

Ocean Financial Centre

Singapore

Torre Iberdrola, Bilbao, Spain

World Financial Center

Beijing, China

Business Instructional Facility, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL

The Visionaire, New York, NY

The Verdesian, New York, NY

First LEED Platinum residential tower in the U.S.

JPMorgan Chase Building

San Francisco, CA

LEED Gold

Fairmont Kuala Lumpur

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (Objective)

Riverview Plaza

Wuhan, China (Objective)

Salesforce Transit Center

San Francisco, CA

School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN

Torre Sevilla & Retail Podium Seville, Spain

Hancher, The University of Iowa Iowa City, IA

George S. and Dolores Doré Eccles

Theater, Salt Lake City, UT

Baosteel Guangzhou Headquarters

Guangzhou, China

Torre Banco Macro

Buenos Aires, Argentina

McKinney & Olive, Dallas, TX

Lanphier Center for Mathematics and Computer Science, Choate Rosemary Hall, Wallingford, CT

UniCredit Headquarters, Milan, Italy

The Theatre School, DePaul University, Chicago, IL

The Avenue, Washington, D.C.

Shanghai IFC, Shanghai, China

ARIA Resort & Casino

Las Vegas, NV

World’s largest LEED Gold Hotel

Connecticut Science Center Hartford, CT

Malone Engineering Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT

International Finance Centre

Hong Kong

The Solaire, New York, NY

Coca-Cola Latin American Headquarters, Del Bosque, Mexico City, Mexico

Owens Corning World Headquarters, Toledo, OH

Key Tower, Cleveland, OH

Plaza Tower, Costa Mesa, CA

777 Tower, Los Angeles, CA

Wells Fargo Center, Minneapolis, MN

900 Third Avenue, New York, NY

80

LEED Silver

Frost Tower, San Antonio, TX (Objective)

Medical and Research Translation Building and Beds & Support Tower, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY (Objective)

Goldring/Woldenberg Business Complex, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA

Buerger Center for Advanced Pediatric Care, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA

Center for Innovation in Medical Professions, Cleveland State University Cleveland, OH

Chemical Biomolecular Engineering and Chemistry Building, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

Bill & Melinda Gates Computer Science Complex, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX

Red Building, Pacific Design Center, West Hollywood, CA

Charles Benson Bear Recreation and Athletic Center, Grinnell College, Grinnell, IA

Terminal and Parkade, Winnipeg James Armstrong Richardson International Airport, Winnipeg, MB, Canada

Arthur & Toni Rembe Rock Hall, UCSF Mission Bay, San Francisco, CA

1900 K Street, Washington, DC

LEED Certified

Sofia, Monterrey, Mexico

Joe Rosenfield Campus Center, Grinnell College, Grinnell, IA

30 Hudson Street, Jersey City, NJ

International

Eighteen King Wah Road

Hong Kong, China, Excellent Intelligent Green Building Award, APIGBA; CGBL Platinum; GBA2014; Beam Plus, Excellence IAQ, Hong Kong Awards for Environmental Excellence

Shanghai Huaneng HQ

Shanghai, China | 2016 | Highest rating under GBAS, China’s Sustainable Design Evaluation System

Yale-NUS College

Singapore | 2013 | Green Mark Platinum Award from the Singapore Building and Construction Authority | 2014 | Landscape Excellence Assessment Framework certification from NParks, Singapore

ARK Hills Sengokuyama Mori Tower, Singapore | 2012 | Re-certified with the highest Green Mark Platinum rating by the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) of Singapore. Winner in the Large Green Building Category at the ASEAN Energy Awards 2015, and received the PUB Water Efficient Building Gold Award in 2015.

Ocean Financial Centre

Tokyo, Japan | 2012 | Highest rating under CASBEE, Japan’s sustainable design rating system

World Financial Center

Beijing, China | 2009 | HK BEAM Platinum

81

Select Awards

Aga Khan Award for Architecture

2004 Award for Architecture – Petronas Towers

AIA

2004 Top Green Project - The Solaire

2000 Honor Award – Kuala Lumpur City Centre

1994 Honor Award – Carnegie Hall Tower

1986 Honor Award – Cleveland Clinic

1986 Honor Award – Herring Hall

AIA Bay Area

1974 Merit Award – Wells Fargo Building

AIA Chicago

2015 Honor Award - The Theater School, DePaul University

AIA Cincinnati

1996 Merit Design Award – Aronoff Center for the Arts

AIA Connecticut

2020 Excellence Award – Yale Science Building

2019 Excellence Award – Hancher, University of Iowa

2019 Project of the Year – Hancher, University of Iowa

2019 Merit Award - Yale-NUS College, Singapore

2019 Merit Award - Wintrust Arena

2019 Merit Award - Goldring/Woldenberg Business Complex, Tulane University

2018 Project of the Year Award – Salesforce Tower

2018 Excellence Award – Salesforce Transit Center

2018 Excellence Award – Salesforce Tower

2017 Honor Award - Lanphier Center for Mathematics and Computer Science, Choate Rosemary Hall

2017 Honor Award – The George S. and Dolores Doré Eccles Theater

2014 Honorable Mention - The Theatre School, DePaul University

2014 Citation - Cooperative Arts and Humanities High School

2014 Citation - St. Katharine Drexel Chapel, Xavier University of Louisiana

2013 Design Award – Built Merit Award - Torre Iberdrola

2012 Hillhouse Avenue Bridges

2011 Design Award - Tokyo American Club

2009 Design Award - Thomas E. Golden Jr. Center

2008 Design Award - Malone Engineering Center, Yale University

2008 Design Award - Overture Center for the Arts

2007 Honorable Mention - Renée and Henry Segerstrom Concert Hall

2006 Design Award - Minneapolis Central Library

2005 Design Award - National Museum of Contemporary Art, Osaka

2004 Design Award - Vogelstein Center for Drama and Film, Vassar College

1999 Design Award - Kuala Lumpur City Centre

1998 Design Award - North Terminal, Reagan National Airport

1997 Drawing Award - Pacific Design Center - Green Building

1997 Design Award - NTT Headquarters

1997 Design Award - Aronoff Center for the Arts

1996 Design Award - Frances Lehman Loeb Art Center

1991 Design Award - Boyer Center for Molecular Medicine

1991 Design Award - Carnegie Hall Tower

1990 Excellence Award – Norwest Center

1990 Excellence Award – World Financial Center

1989 Merit Award - Pacific Design Center Expansion

1987 Design Award - Ley Student Center

1985 Design Award - Herring Hall

AIA New England

2019 Merit Award for Excellence in Architecture – Salesforce Tower

2018 Honor Award – Salesforce Transit Center

2011 Design Award - BOK Center

2000 Honor Award - Kuala Lumpur City Centre

1999 Honor Award - North Terminal, Reagan National Airport

1994 Merit Award – Institute for Advanced Study

1993 Excellence in Architecture Award – Carnegie Hall Tower

AIA New Orleans

2019 Merit Award Architecture – Goldring/Woldenberg Business Complex, Tulane University

AIA New York State

2021 Honor Award – 76 Trinity

2014 Merit Award – 1214 Fifth Avenue

1988 Excellence in Design Award – Museum of Modern Art Gallery Expansion and Residential Tower

1994 Excellence in Design Award – Carnegie Hall Tower

AIA New York

2010 Merit Award – Salesforce Transit Center

2009 Building Type Honor Award – The Visionaire

AIA Northern Virginia

2020 Institutional Architecture: Juror’s Citation – Stony Brook University - Medical and Research Translation Building + New Bed Tower

AIA Orange County

1991 Honor Award – Plaza Tower

AIA Philadelphia Design Awards

2019 Honor Award – FMC Tower at Cira Centre South

AIA Pittsburgh

2019 Honor Award – Honor Award

AIA Louisiana

2019 Merit Award - Goldring/Woldenberg Business Complex, Tulane University

AIA Los Angeles

2003 25 Year Award – Pacific Design Center

AIA Southern California

1976 Citation – Fox Hills Mall

1976 Honor Award – Pacific Design Center - Blue Building

1975 Honor Award – Federal Office Building

1975 Honor Award – San Bernardino City Hall

1975 Merit Award – The Commons and Courthouse Center

1975 Merit Award – Wells Fargo Building

1969 Honor Award – Worldway Postal Center

AIA Shanghai/Beijing

2021 Merit Award for Architecture Significance - Shanghai IFC

AIA/ALA Library Building Award

2009 Library Building Award - Minneapolis Central Library

AIA/Justice Facilities Review

1998 Certificate of Merit – Theodore Roosevelt U.S. Courthouse

AIA/Dupont Benedictus Award

1997 Certificate – Owens Corning Headquarters

1993 Merit Finalist – Winter Garden, World Financial Center

1993 Merit Finalist – Founders’ Hall, Bank of America

AIA/Brick in Architecture

2015 Best in Class (K-12) - Choate Rosemary Hall, Lanphier Center

1997 Award - Physics and Astronomy Building, University of Washington/ Seattle

1995 Award – Institute for Advanced Study

1995 Charles Bulfinch Award – Institute for Advanced Study

1989 Award - Herring Hall

AIA/Modern Architecture

1991 Design Award – St. Luke’s Medical Tower

82

AIA Westchester/Mid Hudson

1994 Honor Award – Frances Lehman Loeb Art Center

AIA/Committee on the Environment

2004 Top 10 Green Project - The Solaire

Americas Property Award

2017 Office Architecture Award - McKinney & Olive

Americas Institute of Steel Construction

2009 Innovative Design in Engineering and Architecture with Structural Steel Award - BOK Center

1968 Honor Award - Teledyne Labs

Architecture Masterprize

2020 Architecture + Metal Finalist – Salesforce Transit Center

2020 Transportation + Infrastructure Finalist – Salesforce Transit Center

Architect’s Newspaper Best of Design Award

2020 Interior Lighting Award – Goldring/Woldenberg Business Complex, Tulane University

Architizer A+Awards

2018 Mixed-Use Architecture – Salesforce Transit Center

2018 Transportation Architecture – Salesforce Transit Center

Asia Pacific Property Awards

2012 Best Office Development Singapore – Ocean Financial Center

2012 Best Office Architecture Singapore – Ocean Financial Center

2012 Best Commercial High Rise Development Singapore – Ocean Financial Center

Athletic Business

2019 Facilities of Merit – Wintrust Arena

Bluebeam

2021 2021 Bluebeam Extreme Project of the Year – Block 185

Build Connecticut Awards

2020 New Large Project Award – Yale Science Building

Building Design + Construction

2018 Platinum, Building Team Awards – Wintrust Arena

Building & Construction Authority

2018 BCA Construction Excellence Award/Institutional Buildings Category – Yale-NUS

2013 BCA Construction Excellence Award – Ocean Financial Center

Building Owners & Managers Association

1996 Office Building of the Year – NationsBank Corporate Center

1994 Office Building of the Year Award – Norwest Center

Building Owners & Managers Association of Greater NY

1984 Restauration and Expansion Award – Museum of Modern Art Gallery

Expansion and Renovation

Chicago Athenium

2020 American Architectural Award – Salesforce Tower

2020 American Architectural Award – Salesforce Transit Center

2018 American Architectural Award – Hancher

2018 American Architectural Award – Wintrust Arena

2016 International Architecture Award – Yale-NUS

2012 American Architecture Award - BOK Center

2010 American Architecture Award - ARIA Resort & Casino

2008 International Architecture Award - Edificio Caja Sol

2008 American Architecture Award - Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts

2008 American Architecture Award -Overture Center for the Arts

2006 American Architecture Award -Cira Centre

Chicago Lighting Institute

1992 181 West Madison – Merit Award

China Construction Industry Association

2019 Luban Award – BaoSteel Guangzhou

China Shopping Mall Value Board

2020 Gold Award, Annual Urban Regeneration Commercial Benchmarking Award – Shanghai Plaza

Construction Excellence Awards from the GBCA

2017 Best Clinical Health Project – The Roberts Center for Pediatric Research (777 Schuykill Ave Tower)

2017 Best Residential/Mixed-Use/Office Project – FMC Tower at Cira Centre South

Construction Industry Service Corporation

2019 Best Tall Building (300-399M) – Salesforce Tower

2019 Best Tall Building Worldwide – Salesforce Tower

2019 Best MEP – Salesforce Tower

Council of Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat

2017 New Construction Award, Project of the Year – Wintrust Arena

D CEO’s 2020 Commercial Real Estate Awards

2020 Best New Headquarters – American Airlines Skyview 8 (Robert L. Crandall Global Suppot Campus AA HQ)

Engineering News Record

2020 Best Regional Project - Award of Merit – Yale Science Building

2018 Merit Award Renovation/Restoration – Alexander Court

2017 National Best of the Best HealthCare Project - Buerger Center for Advanced Pediatric Care, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia

Engineering News Record’s, Louisiana

2019 Best Project, Office/Retail/Mixed-Use – Frost Tower

Engineering News Record’s, Mid-Atlantic region

2017 Merit Award in Higher Education/Research – The Roberts Center for Pediatric Research (777 Schuykill Ave Tower)

2016 Healthcare Best Project – Buerger Center for Advanced Pediatric Care, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia

Engineering News Record’s, Texas

2019 Best Project, Office/Retail/Mixed-Use – Frost Tower

Engineering News Record’s Global Best Projects

2018 Global Best Project Award – Salesforce Tower

Faith & Form; Interfaith Forum on Religion, Art & Architecture

2017 Honor Award – St. Katherine Drexel Chapel, Xavier University of Louisiana

General Building Contractors Association

2017 Excellence in Craftsmanship – Buerger Center for Advanced Pediatric Care, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia

2016 Best Clinical Project – The Roberts Center for Pediatric Research (777 Schuykill Ave Tower)

Guinness World Records

2017 Largest Vertical Garden (Green Wall) – Ocean Financial Center

83

Healthcare Design Awards

2017 Merit Award – Buerger Center for Advanced Pediatric Care, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia

Hong Kong Quality Building

2018 Grand Award – North Point

2004 Award, Certificate of Merit – Two International Finance Centre

Hong Kong Institute of Architects

2020 Merit Award of Hong Kong - Commercial Building –18 King Wah Road

Institute of Real Estate Management

2021 Best Shopping Center in China - Shanghai Plaza

International Property Awards

2017 Office Architecture - McKinney & Olive

2013 Highly Commended Award for Chile, High-Rise Architecture - Torre Costanera

2013 5 Star Award for Chile, Office Architecture - Torre Costanera

2013 Porta Nuova Garibaldi

2013 5 Star Award for China, Mixed-Use Architecture - The Landmark

2013 5 Star Award for China, High-Rise Architecture - The Landmark

2012 World’s Best Commercial High-Rise Development - Ocean Financial Centre

2012 5 Star Award for China, High-Rise Architecture - Riverview Plaza

2012 Highly Commended Award-China, Retail Architecture - Riverview Plaza

2012 Highly Commended Award-China, Mixed-use Architecture - Wuhan Riverview Plaza

International Architecture Award

2008 Torre Sevilla

International Association of Venue Managers

2018 Excellence Award – BOK Center

International Association of Lighting Designers

2017 Excellence Award – Hancher

2008 Merit Award – Renee and Henry Segerstrom Concert Hall and Samueli Theater

1994 Citation – NationsBank Corporate Center

International Economic Development Council

2017 Silver Award for Best Public-Private Partnership - Salt Lake City Redevelopment for Regent Street Development/George S. and Dolores Dore Eccles Theatre

International Illuminating Society

1997 Merit Award – One Market

International Masonry Institute

2002 Golden Trowel Awards Winner, J. DeLuca Memorial Award – Greenwich Library Addition and Renovation

Illuminating Engineering Society

2021 IES Illumination Award of Merit – Medical and Research Translation (MART) Building and New Bed Tower

2020 IES Illumination Award of Merit (Interior Lighting) – Goldring/ Woldenberg Business Complex, Tulane University

2017 Merit Award – Wintrust Arena

2013 Lumen Merit Award – Torre Iberdrola

2013 Lumen Citation – St. Katharine Drexel Chapel, Xavier University of Louisiana

2008 Lumen Excellence Award – Renee and Henry Segerstrom Concert Hall and Samueli Theater

Illuminating Engineering Society New York

2015 Lumen Excellence Award – The Pavilion at Brookfield Place

2007 Lumen Award Citation – Children’s Reading Room, Minneapolis Central Library

1999 Lumen Award – Petronas Towers

1997 Lumen Award Citation – One Market

1995 Lumen Award Citation – NationsBank Corporate Center

Kinpan Award

2020 Best Office Building of the Year – Shanghai Plaza

Landscape Institute Awards

2019 Design for Medium Scale – Piazza Gae Aulenti (Porta Nuova Garibaldi)

Long Island Business News Awards

2020 Top Health Care Project – Piazza Gae Aulenti (Porta Nuova Garibaldi)

MIPIM

2018 Best Urban Regeneration Award – Porta Nuova

NAIOP, Commerical Real Estate

2019 Award of Excellence: Best Washington DC Urban Office over 150,000 SF – Alexander Court

Natural Stone Institute

2018 Pinnacle Excellence Award – Alexander Court

National Association of Home Builders Design

2020 2020 Best in American Living™ Awards - Best in American Living in Multifamily: Development 8 Stories and Over, Built for Sale Category –Residences by Armani/Casa

National Terrazzo & Mozaic Association

2019 Terrazzo Job of the Year – Salesforce Transit Center

2007 Terrazzo Honor Award – Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts of Miami-Dade County

Roger H. Corbetta Awards Program (58th Annual)

2019 Concrete Industry Board Award – The Centrale

SFBJ’s 2020 Structure Awards

2020 Best Architecture/Design Category – Residences by Armani/Casa

Shenzhen Excellent Engineering Survey & Design Award

2021 2nd Prize – One City

Society of American Registered Architects

1994 Certificate of Honor – NationsBank Corporate Center

Structural Engineers Association of Illinois

1997 Merit Award – Petronas Towers

1997 Certificate of Honor – Petronas Towers

1990 Design Award – World Financial Center

U.S. Department of Transportation

2000 Design for Transportation National Awards Honor Award – North Terminal, Reagan National Airport

U.S. Institute of Theatre Technology

2019 Architecture Merit Award – Hancher, University of Iowa

2015 Honor Award – The Theatre School, DePaul University

1997 Honor Award – Aronoff Center for the Arts

Select Awards 84

Urban Land Institute Award for Excellence

2021 Award of Excellence - Wuhan Tiandi Site A

2012 Global Excellence Award - The Avenue

2010 The Visionaire

2009 Project of the Year - Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts

2008 Award for Excellence - Overture Center for the Arts

2005 Award for Excellence - Bloomberg Tower / One Beacon Court

2003 Award for Excellence - Atago Green Hills

1989 Award for Excellence - Outst - Atago Green Hills

1985 Award for Excellence - Museum of Modern Art Expansion and Renovation

Urban Land Institute, Asia Pacific

2020 2020 ULI Asia Pacific Award for Excellence – Nihonbashi Muromachi Mitsui Tower

Urban Land Institute, Philadelphia

2017 Willard Rouse Award – FMC Tower at Cira Centre South

Urban Land Institute, S.E. Florida/Caribbean District

2009 Project of the Year – Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts

Urban Land Institute, North Texas

2019 Impact Award in the Innovation Category – American Airlines Skyview 8 (Robert L. Crandall Global Suppot Campus AA HQ)

2017 Innovation Award – McKinney & Olive

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency & City of NY

2008 Green Building Competition for New York City Grand Prize – The Visionaire

WAN Awards Americas

2019 Gold in Commercial over 50,000 SQM – Salesforce Tower

2019 Silver - Tall Building – Salesforce Tower

2019 Silver - Transportation – Salesforce Transit Center

2019 Silver - Tall Building – Salesforce Tower

2018 Regional Winner, Performing Space – George S. and Dolores Dore Eccles Theatre

West Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce

1988 Beautification Award, Landmark Award – Pacific Design Center - Green Building

Wood Design & Building Awards Program

2019 Citation - Excellence in Wood Architecture & Design – Alexander Court

85

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.