Cognition a marker for silent progression 2023

Page 1

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression

Sapienza University, Rome, Italy

www.paradigms.foundation ParadigMS Pre-MENACTRIMS Symposium Thu. 15 June 2023

Disclosures Prof. C.Pozzilli

Has served on scientific advisory boards for Novartis, Merck Serono, Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Alexion, Bristol Myers, Almirall and Actelion and has received funding for travel and speaker honoraria from Novartis, Merck Serono, Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Actelion, Almirall, Alexion, and receives research support from Merck Serono, Biogen Idec, Roche and Almirall.

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression

2
15/06/23

'At a certain stage of the disease, patients with MS may show marked enfeeblement of the memory; conceptions are formed slowly (information processing speed); the intellectual and emotional faculties are blunted in their entirety‘

(1877) lectures on the diseases of the nervous system, London

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression

3
15/06/23

Disability accumulation in MS Driven by relapses and underlying PIRA

• Two components of disability accumulation: either relapseassociated worsening (RAW) or progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA)

• Underlying progression is present from MS inception in all patients to varying degrees

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression

4 15/06/23

100 Patients (%)

RRMS (N = 50) SPMS (N = 30) 20

60

40

80 0

Impairment of cognitive domains in patients with RRMS and SPMS1 Patients in an outpatient clinic in Greece evaluated with a computerised battery of tests 83% 63% 77% 67% 67% 53% Reaction time Trail making test A* Trail making test B* Psychomotor speed Cognitive flexibility Verbal fluency semantic

1.

2.

Matias-Guiu JA et al. Front Neurol 2017

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression

Cognitive impairment was more common among patients with SPMS than in those with RRMS 1,2
5 15/06/23
In addition, it has been estimated that 58–80% of patients with SPMS have cognitive dysfunction or impairment, compared to 36–38% of patients with RRMS 58% 34% 34% 20% 28% 24%
*Trail making test examines visual attention and task switching RRMS, relapsing–remitting MS; SPMS, secondary progressive MS
Papathanasiou A et al. ISRN Neurol 2014;

Identifying the Distinct Cognitive Phenotypes in Multiple Sclerosis

1212 patients with MS (mean age, 41.1 years); 784 women [64.7%]

196 healthy control individuals (mean age, 40.4 years); 130 women [66.3%]

Five cognitive phenotypes were identified:

• Preserved cognition [19.4%]

• Mild-verbal memory/semantic fluency [29.9%]

• Mild-multidomain [19.5%]

• Severe-executive/attention [13.8%]

• Severe-multidomain involvement [17.5%]

De Meo E G, et al.,Jama Neurol Apr 78 (4): 1-12 ; (2021)

6

Isolated cognitive relapses

An Isolated Cognitive Relapse (ICR) leads to poorer long-term cognitive test scores compared with no ICR1

Baseline Relapse 6 months…

Baseline Relapse 6 months…

Change from baseline in the difference between relapsing patients and stable patients in raw SDMT score.

In each study, the relapsing group recovers after the relapse time point, to varying degrees, seldom returning to a difference score of 0.

ICRI , isolated cognitive relapse; MSNQ, Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Questionnaire; SDMT, Symbol Digit Modalities Test

1. Pardini M, et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014;85:1035-1037;

2. Benedict RHb, et al. Mult Scler 2021; 27:71-78

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression

7 15/06/23 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Test score ICR No ICR 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
ICR No
ICR
*P<0.005; **P<0.001

Progressive cognitive impairment independent by relapse

What are the underlying pathological mechanisms?

Chronic/trapped inflammation

• Meningeal inflammatory aggregates

• Slow expansion of pre-existing lesions

• Subpial cortical demyelination

• Diffuse white matter injury

MS disease progression

Loss of functional reserve

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression 8 15/06/23

Structural damage is modulated by cognitive reserve

• Higher educational attainment moderates the effect of T2 lesion load and third ventricle width on cognition in MS, suggesting increased cognitive reserve provides protection

• Actively enhancing cognitive reserve might reduce or prevent cognitive problems in MS in parallel to disease modifying drugs

Pinter D, et al. PLoS One 2014;9:e87567

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression

9 15/06/23
−1.00 −2.00 20.0 40.0 120.0 0.0 80.0 100.0 0.00 1.00 60.0 Cognition Lesion load (cm3) −1.00 −2.00 4.00 10.0 0 2.00 8.00 0.00 1.00 6.00 Cognition Third ventricle width (mm) • Low education (LE) • High education (HE)

Pathological background

Each MS lesion may have an impact on cognition through various mechanisms including:

• Chronic inflammation

• Disruption of the neuronal/axonal compartments

• Oxidative stress

• Alterations in the cerebral metabolism

Changes in Cortico-Cortical and Cortico-Subcortical connectivity

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression

15/06/23
10
DeLuca G, et al., Brain Pathol; (2015)

Unraveling the substrates of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: A multiparametric structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging study

by using random forest analysis evaluating regional white matter (WM) lesions, WM fractional anisotropy (FA) abnormalities, gray matter (GM) atrophy and RS functional connectivity (FC)

The best MRI predictors of cognitive impairment

White matter lesions

(a) r. superior longitudinal fasciculus (100%),

(b) l.anterior thalamic radiation (93.4%),

(c) l.posterior corona radiata (78.5%),

d) l.medial lemniscus (74.2%),

e) l.inferior longitudinal fasciculus (70.4%),

f) l.optic radiation (68.7%),

g)ri.middle cerebellar peduncle (60.6%)

h) r.optic radiation (53.5%);

Structural

Decreased FAI

a) splenium of the corpus callosum (64.3%),

b) l. optic radiation (61.0%),

c) body of the corpus callosum (51.9%)

d) fornix (50.9%);

Brain Atrophy

a) l. precuneus (91.4%),

b) r. cerebellum crus I (84.4%),

c) r. caudate nucleus (78.6%),

d) l.thalamus (76.2%)

e) l.supplementary motor area (59.8%).

damage in strategic WM and GM regions explains cognitive impairment in MS

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression

11 15/06/23 Conti L. Eur J Neurol 2021 Nov;28(11):3749-3759.doi: 10.1111/ene.15023. Epub 2021 Jul 29.

Pathological background

Eijlers AJ, et al. Brain 2018;141:2605-2618

Patients with cognitive Impairment (CI) showed a reduction in structural connettivity suggesting the presence of a network collapse or its inability to compensate for such impairment.

It is thought that CI in MS may be the result of a “disconnection syndrome “. MS pathology mainly interrupts structural pathaways connecying remote brain regions playing an important role for global cognition

Red Color shows the most represenative resting state networks:

Zhang J. Et al. Structural and Functional connectivity substrate of cognitive impairment in Multiple Sclerosis. Front Neurol Review July 2021

A) Visual Network / B) Deafault mode network / C) Cerebellum network

D) sensorimotor network / E) Auditory network / F) Executive control network

G) right frontotemporal network / H) left frontotemporal network

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression 13 15/06/23

Functional basis of memory impairment in MS: a [18F]FDG PET study

Hypometabolism of thalamic and deep cortical gray structures of the temporal lobe is associated with episodic memory dysfunction in MS.

On the other hand, pathological performance on tests designed to assess frontal functions was associated with widespread reduction of glucose metabolism.

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression

14 15/06/23
1996
Paulesu E et al. Neuroimage

Longitudinal prospective study correlating baseline cognitive impairment with progression of disability in 45 relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients over a period of 7 years

Multivariate linear regressions showed significant correlations between :

― the change in the EDSS over 5 years and baseline SDMT (r2=0.19, p=0.032)

the change in the EDSS over 7 years and baseline CLTR score (r2=0.17, p=0.05)

Early cognitive impairment may predict disability outcome after several years

EDSS progression over 7 years is explained by the baseline CLTR

Cut-off value : 29

CLTR, consistent long-term retrieval; EDSS, expanded disability status score; MS, multiple sclerosis; RRMS, relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis; SDMT, symbol digits modalities test Deloire M et al. Multiple Sclerosis 2010;16:581–587. Figure adapted with permission from Multiple Sclerosis

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression

Early cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis could predict disability outcome several years later
15 15/06/23
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -5 0 5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Calculated EDSS change Impairment
Baseline CLTR score Deterioration = 1

• Cognitive impairment occurs early in patients with RMS1

– Reliable identification depends on assessment tools used

• The PASAT assesses several cognitive domains, including processing speed, working memory, calculation ability, divided attention, and mental flexibility1,2

• The SDMT assesses processing speed and working memory and is more sensitive and reliable than the PASAT3,4

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression

16 15/06/23
1. Sumowski JF, et al. Neurology. 2018;90:278-288. 2. Sonder JM, et al. Mult Scler J. 2014;20(4):481-488. 3. Strober L, et al. Mult Scler. 2019;25(13):1781-1790. 4. López-Góngora M, et al. BMC Neurology. 2015;15:40. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0296-2..

Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)

Advantages1

• Very high sensitivity

• Reliable

• Time efficient and easy

• Well tolerated

• Uniform across languages

• Lack of floor and ceiling effects

• Multiple alternate forms

Disadvantage1

• Other functions affected by MS may contribute to performance

Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT)

Advantage1

• Large amount of data available

Disadvantages1

• Less sensitive than SDMT

• Practice effects

• Ceiling effect

• Poorly tolerated

• Limited by anxiety and math ability

SDMT, Symbol Digit Modalities Test 1. Sumowski JF, et al. Neurology. 2018;90:278-288

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression

17 15/06/23

Recommendations for assessment of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis from the National MS society1

Baseline cognitive screening

Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)2 or other validated screening tool as a minimum, is recommended as an integral component of disease monitoring

Annual re-assessment with the same instrument, or more often as needed, is recommended for all adults and children 8 years or older with MS

○ For all adults and children > 8 years with MS

○ For adults who have experienced a first clinical event or have evidence on MRI of asymptomatic white matter lesions that are consistent with MS (RIS), or evidence of early gray matter damage

○ For any patient who reports changes in cognitive functioning

Depression screening to identify mood changes that may be impacting cognition as well as routine monitoring is recommended at least yearly 1,6

CSCT, Computerised cognitive test; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MS, multiple sclerosis; mSMT, modified story memory technique; MSNQ, Multiple Sclerosis

Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire; PS, processing speed; PST, processing speed test; RIS, radiologically isolated syndrome; SDMT, Symbol Digit Modalities Test

1. Kalb R et al. Mult Scler.2018;24:1665–1680. 2. Benedict RH et al. Mult Scler.2017;23:721–733. 3. Ruet A et al. Mult Scler.2013;19:1665–1672; 4. Rao SM et al. Mult Scler 2017; 23:1929–1937. 5. Benedict RH et al. Mult Scler 2004;10: 675

–678. 6. Honarmand K, Feinstein A. Mult Scler.2009;15:1518–1524.

Cognitive impairment affects patients’ day-to-day lives

Cognitive impairment predicts limitations in the workplace and in social settings independent of level of physical disability 1

Day-to-Day Deficits

Social Outcomes

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression

19 15/06/23
1. Kalb R et al. Mult Scler. 2018;24:1665-1680. 2. Cotter J et al. Neurology. 2016;87:1727-1736. 3. Neuhaus M et al. Eur J Neurol. 2018;25:90-96. 4. Campbell J et al. Postgrad Med J. 2017;93:143-7. 5. Morrow SA et al. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;24:1131-45. 6. Amato MP et al. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:1602-1606. 7. Figved N et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:1097–
1102.
8. Pfleger CC et al. Mult Scler.2010;16:878-882. 9. Landfeldt E et al. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018;24:145-150.
Decrease in employment rates1,4,5
Facial expression recognition2 Ability to drive safely1 Daily life tasks1 Learning new information1 Understanding of complex social situations 3 May contribute to higher divorce rate/difficulties maintaining relationships 8,9 Caregiver stress7 Reduction in social network6

Incorporating cognitive tests to help inform treatment decisions

Domains of disease activity

MSDM points

Interpretation of MSDM total score

Integrated interpretation

All domains green

No change in therapy, Re-evaluate in 6 months

Relapse

Progression of disability (modified MSFC)

T25FW, 9HPT, LCSLC (panel with 1.25% contrast)

Each test with worsening by 20%

Each test with worsening by 40%

≥2 points = red

1 domain yellow Re-evaluate in ≤3 months

≥2 domains yellow or

≥1 domain red

Consider optimisation/change of therapy

SDMT

Worsening by ≥4 points

Worsening by ≥8 points

Neuropsychology

MRI

• Multiple Sclerosis Decision Model (MSDM), incorporates cognitive status, fatigue, depression and quality of life with standard metrics of relapse rate, disability progression and MRI.

• Treatment optimisation is re-evaluated for deterioration in two functional tests or severe deterioration in one test

9HPT, 9-Hole Peg Test; LCSLC, Low-Contrast Sloan Letter Chart; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MSFC, Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite; SDMT, Symbol Digit Modalities Test; T25FW, Timed 25-Foot WalkStangel M et al. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2015;8:3-13.

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression

20 15/06/23
1 2 1 2 0
=
=
points
green 1 point
yellow

Is there a Role for Cognitive Training?

Improving cognitive performance?

Heterogeneity in training response

Campbell et al., 2016

Goverover et al., 2018

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression

21 15/06/23

Included with permission from Penner I-K et al. Presentation at the 6th Congress of the European Academy of Neurology; 23–26 May 2020; Virtual Presentation. EPR3080

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression

22 15/06/23

DMTs

improving cognitive test performance in RRMS

Overall

• Meta-analysis of 44 studies, including 55 distinct MS patient samples and 7131 patients

• Small-to-moderate positive effect on cognitive test performance of DMTs – g = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.21–0.33

• DMTs are effective in improving cognitive test performance in RRMS

CI, confidence interval; DMT, disease-modifying therapy; MS, multiple sclerosis; RRMS, relapsing-remitting MS.Landmeyer NC et al. Neurology. 2020;94:e2373–e2383

are effective in
Cognition in
23 15/06/23
MS: a marker of silent progression
effects Platform therapy β-Interferon Glatiramer acetate Dimethyl fumarate Teriflunomide Escalation therapy Natalizumab Fingolimod Alemtuzumab Rituximab* Cyclophosphamide* 0.27 (0.21-0.33) 0.27 (0.18-0.35) 0.30 (0.19-0.41) 0.30 (0.11-0.50) 0.12 (-0.16-0.40) 0.13 (-0.18-0.44) 0.28 (0.19-0.37) 0.28 (0.15-0.41) 0.26 (0.12-0.40) 0.40 (-0.29-1.10) 0.27 (-0.17-0.71) 0.69 (-0.32–1.70) -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Hedges g

Cognitive benefits are seen when treating early

• Patients received SC IFN β-1b 250μg or placebo QOD, for 2 years or until a diagnosis of CDMS (BENEFIT Study)

• Cognitive improvements were more pronounced in early treatment versus delayed treatment

BL, baseline; CDMS, clinically definite multiple sclerosis; IFN β-1b, interferon beta-1b; PASAT, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test; QOD, every other day; SC, subcutaneous Penner IK et al. Mult Scler. 2012;18:1466–1471

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression

24 15/06/23
BL 189 111 6m 175 103 12m 168 104 18m 171 103 24m 168 101 30m 159 92 36m 160 93 42m 157 89 48m 156 86 54m 154 80 60m 152 80 BL 101 63 6m 92 59 12m 85 54 18m 86 54 24m 83 50 30m 79 44 36m 78 41 42m 78 42 48m 74 43 54m 73 38 60m 75 40 Good baseline cognition (PASAT-3”>52) Mean 56.99 57.13 P=0.15* 9 0 −1 2 4 6 7 8 Mean change in PASAT3” score from baseline 5 3 1 Early Delayed Poorer baseline cognition (PASAT-3”≤52) P=0.015* 9 1 0 3 6 7 8 5 4 2 Mean 43.86 45.29 Early Delayed

Take Home Messages

• Cognitive impairment is a common marker of disease progression

• Structural damage in strategic WM and GM regions explains cognitive impairment

• The importance of screening and monitoring cognitive performance

• Strategy training and disease modified treatment should be beneficial if started early

Cognition in MS: a marker of silent progression

15/06/23
25

Thank you

Full Professor of Neurology

Founding Chairman S.Andrea Multiple Sclerosis Center

Sapienza University, Rome, Italy

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.