2021.06.29 Version 1.0
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
Kansas City Urology Care KCUC Therapy Center Nall Ave. & Indian Creek Pkwy Overland Park, KS 66211 6/29/2021
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
PROJECT BIM EXECUTION PLAN (BExP) VERSION 1.0 FOR:
Kansas City Urology Care (Client) KCUC Therapy Center (Project) DEVELOPED BY:
McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION A: BIM EXECUTION PLAN OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 2 SECTION B: PROJECT INFORMATION ...................................................................................................... 3 SECTION C: PROJECT PARTICIPANTS ..................................................................................................... 3 SECTION D: PROJECT TEAM MEMBER ROLES........................................................................................ 4 SECTION E: PROJECT BIM GOALS / USE CASES ..................................................................................... 4 SECTION F: BIM REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................. 7 SECTION G: BIM PROCESS DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ...................................................................... 10 SECTION H: COORDINATION PROCEDURES......................................................................................... 11 SECTION I: POINT OF ORIGIN/PROJECT CONTROL SETUP .................................................................. 17 SECTION J: COORDINATION DELIVERABLES ........................................................................................ 18 SECTION K: BIM COORDINATION SCHEDULE ....................................................................................... 18 SECTION L: BUILDING SYSTEMS COORDINATION ............................................................................... 18 SECTION M: COORDINATION SIGN-OFF PROCESS .............................................................................. 20 SECTION N: ATTACHMENTS/REFERENCES .......................................................................................... 22 SECTION O: BIM EXECUTION PLAN AGREEMENT PAGE .................................................................... 22
*Note: McCarthy Building Companies reserves the right to change/modify this plan as required to reflect the Intent of the Owner and Engineer of Record requirements contained within the Contract Documents, as well as, industry standards related to the policies, procedures and processes described herein.
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
1
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
SECTION A: BIM EXECUTION PLAN OVERVIEW Overview: To successfully implement Building Information Modeling (BIM) on a project, the Project Team must agree to a detailed Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP) to serve as the “Roadmap for BIM Implementation”. This BExP defines the BIM goals, roles and responsibilities, specific requirements, LOD scope (Level of Development vs. Level of Detail) and schedules throughout all phases of the Project. When executed and agreed upon by the Project Participants, this BExP and any modifications are official contract documents as defined in the McCarthy BIM Exhibit. Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Virtual Design & Construction (VDC) have both come to mean different things to individual project stakeholders, but when used in collaboration on a project as a team, clear definitions are necessary. For this project, the working definitions for BIM and VDC will be as defined by the BuildingSMART Alliance: "A Building Information Model (BIM) is a digital representation of physical and functional characteristics of a facility. As such it serves as a shared knowledge resource for information about a facility forming a reliable basis for decisions during its life-cycle from inception onward." "A basic premise of Virtual Design and Construction (VDC) is collaboration by different stakeholders at different phases of the life cycle of a facility to insert, extract, update or modify information in a BIM-enabled process such as VDC to support and reflect the roles of that stakeholder.” Using that definition as a compass and to maximize the effectiveness of BIM in a collaborative environment, a BExP must be created collaboratively by the Project Team. The purpose of this guide is to give a structured procedure for creating and implementing the BExP for Kansas City Urology Care Therapy Center. This plan must align BIM tools and applications with project goals. It is important to understand the appropriate uses for BIM on this project and that NOT all facets of BIM need to be used if they do not have a fit to helping achieve the project goals. In Lean terms, the tools need to maximize value and minimize waste. This guide will help us to identify the required tools, the process for using the tools, the Level of Development and Level of Detail, model deliverables, and the responsible parties. Mission: McCarthy Building Companies and its Trade Partners embrace BIM (Building Information Modeling) as a core process and best practice for ensuring the very highest return on investment for its Clients over the entire lifecycle of a facility, continuing to pay dividends long after the last milestone in the design and construction phases have been completed. Building Information Modeling (BIM) is the process of generating and managing building data during its life cycle. Typically, it uses three-dimensional, real-time, dynamic building modeling software to increase productivity in coordination and construction. The process produces the Building Information Model (also abbreviated BIM), which encompasses building geometry, spatial relationships, geographic information, and quantities and properties of building components. BIM technology and VDC processes allow McCarthy Building Companies to perform most effectively for enhanced collaboration with its Design and Construction Partners. BIM Design/Construction Expectations: Kansas City Urology Care Therapy Center shall utilize BIM at a minimum for the coordination of site and building systems, including but not limited to: Roof/Floor/Wall Penetrations, Superstructure (Structural Steel, Concrete, Precast Concrete, Masonry), Misc. Metals, Misc. Building Trades (Windows/Skylights, Door Frames, Overhead Doors), Process Piping and Supports, Process Equipment, HVAC Systems/Piping and Controls, Plumbing, Fire Protection, Electrical, Low Voltage (Security), Instrumentation and Controls, Earthwork and Drainage, and Yard Piping. The use of Virtual Design & Construction in a BIM-enabled environment will look to achieve the following BIM Goals:
Enhanced Design Integration and Coordination through a collaborative environment Reduction in number of coordination related RFI's during the installation process Reduction in the number of field related issues Improvement in schedule reliability of coordinated systems Reduction in MEP/FP system deficiencies Faster response to coordination related RFI's when accompanied by 3D model depiction
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
2
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
Higher quality installation through pre-fabrication and installation as-modeled Reliable fab/installation schedules through release of materials only when “clash-free” or “clash approved” Higher efficiency of building maintenance through access/clearance/egress zone modeling Fully coordinated trade systems with all Trade Contractors who have “skin in the game” Shorter, more meaningful coordination meetings and coordination timeframes More complete understanding of the project details by our Project Teams Use of Prefabricated Systems – 3D Mockups, saving space, improving safety
SECTION B: PROJECT INFORMATION This section defines basic project reference information and determined project milestones: 1.
FACILITY OWNER:
Kansas City Urology Care
2.
PROJECT NAME:
KCUC Therapy Center
3.
PROJECT LOCATION:
Overland Park, KS
4.
CONTRACT TYPE:
Construction Manager-at-Risk
5.
FACILITY TYPE:
Healthcare
6.
BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: New 30,000 sf Medical Office Building with a Proton Therapy vault and a Linear Accelerator Vault.
7.
PROJECT NUMBERS:
8.
PROJECT TEAM MEMBER
PROJECT NUMBER
KCUC
xxx
MCCARTHY
xxx
TREANORHL
xxx
PROJECT BExP CHANGE LOG: Log all changes to the approved BExP below providing a description and page number of the change:
DATE
VERSION
DESCRIPTION
2021.06.29
1.0
Project BIM Execution Plan for Bidding
SECTION C: PROJECT PARTICIPANTS The following Design & Construction Team Members should expect to be involved in the Design & Construction BExP and 3D Trade Coordination Process. Specific Roles, Responsibilities, and Deliverables will be outlined further in this BExP: Owner/Owner’s Representative (OWN) – Kansas City Urology Care Engineer of Record (DOR) – TreanorHL Structural Engineer (STD) – BDC Civil Engineer (CIVL) – Renaissance Infrastructure Consulting Consulting Engineer – PEC Construction Manager-at-Risk (CMR) – McCarthy Building Companies Structural Steel Trade Contractor (SSC) – TBD Concrete Structure Trade Contractor (SCC) – TBD Masonry Trade Contractor (MAC) – TBD
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
3
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
Plumbing Trade Contractor (PLC) – TBD HVAC/HVAC Controls Trade Contractor (HVC) – TBD Fire Suppression Contractor (FSC) – TBD Electrical Trade Contractor (ELC) – TBD Low Voltage Security Trade Contractors (SEC) – TBD Instrumentation and Controls Contractor (ICC) – TBD Miscellaneous Metals Contractor (MMC) – TBD
SECTION D: PROJECT TEAM MEMBER ROLES Determine Project Team Member BIM Roles/Responsibilities: Owner 1). Owner/Owner’s Rep – Owner representative(s) informing/reviewing the overall 3D Trade Coordination process from Design Phase through Closeout Phase. Designers of Record / Design Consultants 1). Design Project Manager – Engineering representative informing Design-Intent in the overall 3D Trade Coordination process. 2). Design Consultant Representatives – Engineering representatives informing Design-Intent in the overall 3D Trade Coordination process. McCarthy 1). Project Manager/Engineer – McCarthy representative leading/facilitating overall 3D Trade Coordination process. 2). VDC Manager – McCarthy representative supporting overall 3D Trade Coordination process. McCarthy Trade Contractors* 1). Trade Project Manager (responsible for Coordination Oversight, Key Decision-Making Authority) 2). Trade Superintendent/Foreman (responsible for Coordination Oversight, Key Decision-Making Authority) 3). BIM Coordinator (responsible for model content and model coordination between trades, Key Decision-Making Authority) 4). BIM Detailer (responsible for model content and fabrication information/detail to facilitate accurate coordination models) *Note: Trades must have Key Decision-Making Authority present in every meeting to facilitate coordination decisions. Not all individuals are required to attend if individual(s) can make coordination-related decisions on behalf of that trade contractor. *
SECTION E: PROJECT BIM GOALS / USE CASES 1.
BIM GOALS / OUTCOMES McCarthy Building Companies have identified the following potential BIM Goals for the project. The project team, Design Managers and BIM/VDC Managers will be responsible for strategizing the implementation of the different BIM Goals outlined below. PRIORITY
GOAL DESCRIPTION / OUTCOMES
EXECUTION
HIGH
Goal: use parametric 3D BIM authoring software to generate design and construction models and deliverables for construction documentation and field installation. Outcome: Highest quality product of deliverables that generates a wellcoordinated design and construction process for accurate results and on time project delivery.
Use of TreanorHL’s and McCarthy’s team member capabilities in best-in-class software deployment.
HIGH
Goal: cloud-based model collaboration and model hosting to drive full team integration around a ‘single source of truth’. Outcome: access to BIM files from anywhere with an internet connection and live up-to-date information.
Use of McCarthy’s Autodesk BIM360 account to host all Design Management items. Use of McCarthy’s Procore account to host all Field Management items.
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
4
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
HIGH
Goal: Elimination of field re-work and field conflicts associated with Building Systems Coordination. Outcome: Trade Coordination 3D models which feed field installation through a Model-Based Field Layout workflow.
Use of McCarthy’s 3D Trade Coordination Process to mitigate team risk.
HIGH
Goal: Increase productivity and efficiency from Construction Coordination through Coordination Drawing submission, review, and approval to enable early Prefabrication and Installation. Outcome: Effective review/approval process for building systems coordination drawings to enable early prefabrication and installation; enable construction schedule efficiencies to hit and potentially beat milestones.
Use of a Design Authoring and Management Process through BIM360 to preplan building systems sequencing, hierarchy, coordination, and prefabrication.
HIGH
Goal: Utilize 3D visualization through various tools and mediums to streamline communications, review processes and project delivery to our Client and add value to the overall project. Outcome: Reduction of RFIs, Change Orders and Field Coordination issues through the expedited resolution of issues, questions and constructability challenges.
Use of BIM-enabled tools and technologies to visualize complexed challenges and scenarios to foster efficient and timely decision-making.
HIGH
Goal: The Engineer of Record shall conform their Design Intent Models with all the information that is released by the Design Team throughout the course of the design and construction processes. This would include but not be limited to all Addenda, Bulletins, Supplemental Sketches (ASIs), Construction Change Directives (CCDs) and Change Orders (COs) per the Project Deliverables. Outcome: Accurate Record Design Model deliverables to the Owner that reflect final coordinated, installed and as-built verified conditions.
Collaborative effort between DORs, Trade Partners, and McCarthy to validate final record design with as-built conditions back into final model deliverables.
2.
BIM USE CASES The below categories and use cases are potential BIM Use Cases on this project. Items highlighted and marked with an ‘X’ designate BIM Use Cases required/planned for this project: PROJECT PHASING
X
PLAN
X
DESIGN
X
CONSTRUCT
X
OPERATE
X
RECORD DESIGN-INTENT MODEL HANDOVER RECORD CONSTRUCTION COORDINATION MODEL HANDOVER RECORD AS-BUILT TRADE CONTRACTOR MODELS AND DRAWINGS HANDOVER FACILITY ASSET DATA COLLECTION
X
DESIGN AUTHORING
X
SITE UTILIZATION PLANNING
X
3D DESIGN REVIEWS
X
SELF-PERFORM CONSTRUCTION MODELING
X
X
DESIGN COORDINATION / CLASH PREVENTION
X
3D TRADE COORDINATION
X
X
DIGITAL FABRICATION
X
DESIGN-ASSIST COLLABORATION EXISTING CONDITIONS DOCUMENTATION/ MODELING CLOUD-BASED DESIGN COORDINATION
X
MODEL-BASED FIELD LAYOUT
X
AS-BUILT RECORD MODELING EXISTING CONDITIONS MODELING REALITY CAPTURE (LASER SCANNING)
X
X X PHASE: DESIGN
DESIGN AUTHORING – DESIGN INTENT BIM Autodesk Revit will serve as our primary BIM authoring platform and basis for collaboration and project deliverables. The Engineer of Record is responsible for all printing and issuance of any official, stamped Design Deliverables Issued for Construction (IFC), or any reissuance. Reference the BIM & Level of Development (LOD) Modeling Matrix for modeling requirements.
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
5
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
EXISTING CONDITION DOCUMENTATION/MODELING This effort will include: o o o
Design Modeling effort: modeling at interface with Design Intent BIM, at least one existing structural bay beyond the scope of new work/ demolition. Use of 360 panorama photo capture with Plan reference. Lidar/Laser Scanning/Subsurface Utility Mapping of existing conditions during the Design Phase.
CLOUD-BASED DESIGN COORDINATION The Design Intent BIMs will rely on BIM360 & Revizto for project file management and collaboration. This effort will include: o o o o o
Cloud based files that can be accessed from anywhere once membership has been granted. Shared libraries of content in one server location with version history. Usage of Markups and issue tracking to facilitate communication and track design progress. All major modeling milestones and PDF deliverables will be published and distributed by the cloud. McCarthy will host and administer access to the site for all users
DESIGN-INTENT COORDINATION – CLASH PREVENTION The Engineer of Record (DOR) and Modeling Coordinator will coordinate the modeling Level of Development (LOD) for building components, assemblies and systems to provide assurance that the occupied space needed by these building systems is adequate and that the systems can be integrated without interfering with one another while maintaining accessibility and serviceability. The clash prevention process allows for overall coordination of the spatial relationships among the model’s components, assemblies and systems, and their final progression as defined in the BIM execution plan. Equipment clearance elements will be incorporated where appropriate. In addition, regular design reviews will be scheduled to review conflict at major design milestones. CONFORMED DESIGN INTENT BIMs The Design Team members and Design-Assist Trade Partners shall conform their Design Intent Models with all the information that is released by the Design Team throughout the course of the design and construction processes. This would include but not be limited to all Addenda, Bulletins, Supplemental Sketches (ASIs), Construction Change Directives (CCDs) and Change Orders (COs) per the Project Deliverables outlined in Section 2. Project BIM Deliverable Schedule.
PHASE: CONSTRUCT SITE UTILIZATION PLANNING Modeling conducted by McCarthy to assist early design coordination prior to field construction. This can include elements such as temporary utilities, tower crane foundations, site fencing, etc. 3D TRADE COORDINATION (FINITE COORDINATION) The planned process of using 3D models for the purposes of clash detection and interference management to resolve spatial conflicts prior to the sign-off of trade contractor coordination models for fabrication. This is a builder-led process by McCarthy. SELF-PERFORM CONSTRUCTION MODELING The planned process of creating self-perform trade models that are installed by that contractor to produce trade coordination drawings. MODEL-BASED FIELD LAYOUT The planned practice of using all trade contractor models geospatially located from 3D Trade Coordination in the field for digital layout with robotic total stations aligned to real-world coordinates. RECORD MODELING / AS-BUILT MODELING Record Modeling: the final record design inclusive of all project design changes from the Designer of Record. As-Built Modeling: the final as-coordinated and as-built verified representation of Trade Contractor models. DIGITAL FABRICATION The planned practice of using 3D Trade Coordination Models to produce fabrication content in their shop using computer-driven technology to machining systems.
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
6
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
REALITY CAPTURE (LASER SCANNING / 360 PHOTOS) The planned practice to use reality capture devices such as laser scanning, 360 photography, or drone photogrammetry to document existing conditions or as-built conditions for the purposes of construction coordination. PHASE: OPERATE RECORD DESIGN BIM The Design Team members shall conform their Design-Intent Models with all the information that is released by the Design Team throughout the course of the design and construction processes. This would include but not be limited to all Addenda, Bulletins, Supplemental Sketches (ASIs), Construction Change Directives (CCDs) and Change Orders (COs) per the Project Deliverables. This deliverable will be expected to be handed over to the Owner at Substantial Completion. AS-BUILT FEDERATED MODEL HANDOVER Compiling of all final Record Design Models plus As-Built Trade Contractor models into one final Federated Model. AS-BUILT TRADE PARTNER MODELS & DRAWINGS HANDOVER As-Built Modeling: the final as-coordinated and as-built verified representation of Trade Contractor models.
SECTION F: BIM REQUIREMENTS 1.
MODEL DELIVERABLES The disciples marked with an ‘X’ below are providing or are required to produce 3D model files for this project and participate in the 3D Trade Coordination Process as required for the full coordination of building systems:
Engineers (Design-Intent Models) Using Bentley MicroStation V8i ☒ Process Mechanical ☒ Structural Model Design Model (DOR) (DOR) ☒ MEP/FP Design ☒ Civil Model Models (DOR) (DOR)
2.
Trade Contractor Partners (Fabrication-Level Models) Using Autodesk Revit 2021 (Required) ☒ Structural Steel ☒ Structural Concrete Model (SSC) Model (SCC) ☒ Plumbing Models ☒ Electrical Model (PLC) (ELC) ☒ Fire Suppression ☒ HVAC Models Models (FSC) (HVC) ☒ Site Utilities Model ☒ Masonry Models (MAC) (SITE) ☒ Med Gas Models ☒ Misc. Metals Model (MG) (MMC) ☐ Misc. Building ☒ Low Voltage Security Trades (ROC, WSC, Models (SEC) DHC)
BID SCHEDULE, PACKAGES AND WORK CATEGORIES The disciplines noted below are required to provide 3D BIM content, adhere, and perform to the specifications set forth in this BExP. *Note: Work Categories (WCs) listed below marked with an ‘X’ and marked with an asterisk (*) are not required to provide 3D model content. However, these WCs are required to coordinate traditional 2D shop drawings with 3D model content provided by the Engineer of Record and McCarthy to ensure no impacts to field coordination at a minimum. Trade Contractor performing work for these Work Categories may opt to provide 3D model content to ensure proper coordination as part of their base bid at no additional cost to the project.*
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
7
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0 BID PACKAGES
BID PACKAGE
SPECIFICATIONS
1
Sitework and Utilities
Division 31
BIM REQ’D ☐
2
Concrete
Division 3
☒
3
Structural Steel
Division 5
☒
4
Waterproofing
Division 7
☐
5
Landscaping
Division 32
☐
☐ Future Bid Packages (TBD)
3. MODEL CONTENT – LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT (LOD) DEFINITIONS BIMForum AGC LOD Specification 2019 Models and Model elements created by/with all Model Element Authors (MEAs), Level of Development (LOD) and any specific attributes important to the project are to adhere to and be documented using the current BIMForum’s AGC LOD Specification 2019 that can be found at http://bimforum.org/lod/
LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT vs. LEVEL OF DETAIL LOD is sometimes interpreted as Level of Detail rather than Level of Development. This Specification uses the concept of Level of Development. There are important differences. Level of Detail is essentially how much detail is included in the model element. Level of Development is the degree to which the element’s geometry and attached information has been thought through – the degree to which project team members may rely on the information when
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
8
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
using the model. In essence, Level of Detail can be thought of as input to the element, while Level of Development is reliable output. LEVEL of DEVELOPMENT DEFINITIONS PER PHASE AIA Level of Development (LOD) Definitions are as follows (also refer to the referenced AGC LOD Document): LOD 100 – Compatible with Conceptual/Schematic Design Phase The Model Element may be graphically represented in the Model with a symbol or other generic representation but does not satisfy the requirements for LOD 200. Information related to the Model Element (i.e. cost per square foot, tonnage of HVAC, etc.) can be derived from other Model Elements. BIMForum Interpretation: LOD 100 elements are not geometric representations. Examples are information attached to other model elements or symbols showing the existence of a component but not its shape, size, or precise location. Any information derived from LOD 100 elements must be considered approximate. LOD 200 – Compatible with Design Development Phase The Model Element is graphically represented within the Model as a generic system, object, or assembly with approximate quantities, size, shape, location, and orientation. Non-graphic information may also be attached to the Model Element. BIMForum interpretation: At this LOD elements are generic placeholders. They may be recognizable as the components they represent, or they may be volumes for space reservation. Any information derived from LOD 200 elements must be considered approximate. LOD 300 – Compatible with Construction Document Phase The Model Element is graphically represented within the Model as a specific system, object, or assembly in terms of quantity, size, shape, location, and orientation. Non-graphic information may also be attached to the Model Element. BIMForum interpretation: The quantity, size, shape, location, and orientation of the element as designed can be measured directly from the model without referring to non-modeled information such as notes or dimension callouts. The project origin is defined and the element is located accurately with respect to the project origin. LOD 350 – Compatible with Construction Document/Bidding/Procurement Phase The Model Element is graphically represented within the Model as a specific system, object, or assembly in terms of quantity, size, shape, location, orientation, and interfaces with other building systems. Non-graphic information may also be attached to the Model Element. BIMForum interpretation: Parts necessary for coordination of the element with nearby or attached elements are modeled. These parts will include such items as supports and connections. The quantity, size, shape, location, and orientation of the element as designed can be measured directly from the model without referring to non-modeled information such as notes or dimension callouts. LOD 400 – Compatible with Construction Coordination/Fabrication Phase The Model Element is graphically represented within the Model as a specific system, object, or assembly in terms of size, shape, location, quantity, and orientation with detailing, fabrication, assembly, and installation information. Nongraphic information may also be attached to the Model Element. BIMForum interpretation: An LOD 400 element is modeled at sufficient detail and accuracy for fabrication of the represented component. The quantity, size, shape, location, and orientation of the element as designed can be measured directly from the model without referring to non-modeled information such as notes or dimension callouts. LOD 500 – Compatible with Record Models, As-Built Models for Closeout/Handover Phase BIMForum interpretation: Since LOD 500 relates to field verification and is not an indication of progression to a higher level of model element geometry or non-graphic information, the BIMForum LOD Specification does not define or illustrate it. The below definition of LOD 500 is specific to McCarthy’s expectations after 100% Construction Documents and post-Trade Coordination sign-off for model maintenance: 1). LOD 500A relative to Maintaining Record Design-Intent Models: Representative of the Record Design-Intent Models being maintained with any official changes to the Work, through Substantial Completion. Field Verification of the Record Design-Intent is not a direct requirement of
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
9
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
the Design Team’s Record models. LOD 500A is typically the responsibility of the Engineer of Record (DOR) for that designated scope of work per the LOD Matrix of BIM Deliverables. 2). LOD 500B relative to Maintaining As-Coordinated Models: Representative of the As-Coordinated Trade Contractor models being maintained, inclusive of any official changes to the Work, through Substantial Completion. Trade Contractors are to ensure any post-signoff model/drawing changes do not impact other Trade Contractors respective to their Work. LOD 500B is typically the responsibility of the Trade Contractor for that designated scope of work per the LOD Matrix of BIM Deliverables. 3). LOD 500C relative to As-Built Models/Field Verification: Representative of the As-Built Trade Contractor models matching final construction conditions, inclusive of any official changes to the Work, through Substantial Completion. Field Verification of the Trade Contractor’s model and drawing files aligning to produce their final As-Builts. LOD 500C is typically the responsibility of the Trade Contractor for that designated scope of work per the LOD Matrix of BIM Deliverables. 3. MODEL CONTENT AUTHORING – LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT (LOD) MATRIX The Level of Development outlines the specific Model Element Authors and Model Elements expected from each model file for the project (Refer to the LOD definitions in the section above). See attached LOD Matrix for BIM Deliverables for scope requirements for Trade Partner model content, detail, and progression. See [ATTACHMENT A: LOD Matrix for BIM Deliverables v1.0]
SECTION G: BIM PROCESS DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 1. Summary of Design & Construction Process for BIM Deliverables Design Phase up to Issuance of Construction Documents (IFC): o Model Collaboration through BIM360 and Revizto (McCarthy). Construction Phase up to Substantial Completion: o DOR to maintain Design Models as the project progresses – reissue contract document changes to Record Design as required. o Trades will model their specific discipline’s scope of work to LOD 400 for Finite Coordination – models will produce final coordination drawings for A/E review and approval prior to fabrication. o Trades will maintain their respective LOD 400 coordination models throughout the Construction Phase, capturing any post sign-off changes for field coordination. o Monthly Model Alignment Meeting between TreanorHL and McCarthy will review any changes to Record Design vs. Field Coordination in advance of official change documents (ASIs, Bulletins, etc.) o TreanorHL reissues any official contract document changes as needed to McCarthy – McCarthy will re-coordinate and re-signoff any areas of works as needed post-signoff, document for change management. See definition for LOD 500 above. Closeout/Handover Phase: o TreanorHL delivers Record Design documents to Owner. o McCarthy delivers As-Built trade models and a final Federated Coordination Model based on Record Design models + As-Built Trade models. 2. Construction Manager and Trade Contractors Finite Coordination Process o Trade Contractor agrees to provide the use of digital/computer based 3D parametric models and other related functionality, generally referred to as Building Information Modeling (such models and functionality are referred to herein as BIM), as McCarthy determines beneficial for use in facilitating coordination, sequencing, scheduling, and/or production of construction shop drawings, record drawings, depictions of the Project, performance of the work and as hereafter provided. The Trade Contractors’ costs of such participation and implementation are included in the Contract Price. o Trade Contractors shall all author and work natively in the project’s most current version of Autodesk Revit (or other approved software by McCarthy) in order to live link and collaborate in the cloud via BIM360 for the purposes of drawing coordination and issuance with the Designers of Record. Trade Contractor shall provide digital submissions of information describing their respective work, such shall be provided in form and manner described by the contract documents; or as directed by McCarthy, that are accurate and compatible with the current version of Autodesk Navisworks, and can be loaded into a Federated Coordination Model file (NWF) assembled by McCarthy.
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
10
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP) o
o
o o
o
o
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
Trade Contractor shall participate in BIM Coordination Meetings and follow up review meetings as requested by McCarthy. Trade Contractor agrees that as a result of the information exchanged at such meetings, both the digital submission and the Work depicted in the Trade Contractors’ digital submissions, may require changes or modifications by the Trade Contractor to achieve compliant coordination with other elements of the Project, including when provided by others. Such changes/modifications shall be accomplished at no additional cost or time impact to the project, time is of the essence. The Trade Contractors acknowledge that such meetings will require attendance of personnel that are familiar with both the data entry aspects of BIM, as well as an understanding of the Work to be performed and its relation to other elements of the Project. The Trade Contractor therefore agrees that personnel conversant in both shall attend all said meetings. Trade Contractor agrees that neither participation in the BIM process, nor the use of BIM, relieves the Trade Contractor of the responsibilities described in this document, including to, coordinate the Work, with the work of other trades, and strictly comply with other requirements of the Subcontract Agreement, the Contract Documents, and Specifications. It is expressly understood and agreed that, notwithstanding the requirement for submittals in connection with BIM, traditional shop drawings and other submissions shall be provided by Trade Contractor as described in the Contract Documents. No party will be entitled to any claim for extra time or money, dispute, controversy, cost or expense increase, arising out of the direct or indirect use of BIM. McCarthy does not waive any of its intellectual property rights and shall have the sole and exclusive right to use BIM project products, all submissions made by Trade Contractors as it deems appropriate; before, during or after construction. Trade Contractor agrees, notwithstanding the fact they participate or are involved in the BIM process, or receive information of materials from others in connection with the Project, throughout the course of use and development of BIM, they shall not take any position that receipt of such participation or information has, or will, in any respect, waive, release, or otherwise invalidate any of its obligations or responsibilities under their Subcontract Agreement, or any intellectual property rights (copyrights, trademarks/logos, patents, etc.) that may apply to such information or materials. Trade Contractor acknowledges and agrees, that McCarthy shall incur no responsibility or liability with respect to the BIM or use thereof, including that resulting from errors, omissions or deficiencies in the BIM process. In the event that Trade Contractors provide deficient information or data that does not represent the Work, or is corrupted, or contains a virus, and/or otherwise damages or delays the BIM process, Trade Contractor(s) shall bear all costs associated with reconstructing their BIM’s, and to remediate such deficiencies and their negative impact and effects at no additional costs to McCarthy, the Owner or other Trade Contractors. The foregoing process is part of the Trade Contractors’ obligations to make the traditional submissions, and shall not relieve, or lessen in anyway, the Trade Contractors’ obligations contained throughout this Agreement and the Contract Documents.
SECTION H: COORDINATION PROCEDURES 1.
FINITE COORDINATION PROCESS
The processes and responsibilities outlined below will walk you through the Trade Contractor expectations and deliverables associated with McCarthy’s 3D Finite Trade Coordination Requirements for this project – which occurs after the development of 100% Construction Documents. Trade Contractor fabrication & coordination model submissions shall be of sufficient Level of Development (LOD) as specified in this BIM Execution Plan and related attachments to enable accurate and complete clash detection of all building systems and validation to the final as- built conditions. Submissions shall be provided by Trade Contractors within two working days from Contractor’s request, or as defined by McCarthy at the time of request. Shop drawing submittals and the subsequent on-site construction of the Trade Contractor’s work shall contain details, elevations, dimensions, as described in the contract documents and specifications, or as directed by McCarthy. Each Trade Contractor is required to complete 100% CD / IFC documents to progress into the 3D Finite Trade Coordination clash detection analysis to ensure no finite conflicts exist between LOD 400 elements that are progressed further than the 100% CD modeled content inclusive of fabrication-level elements such as bracing, hangers, supports, etc. McCarthy will confirm compliance with clash reports for building systems in conflict with other trades and systems. A clashed model will be posted to the McCarthy cloud-coordination site, and notice sent to all parties involved to notify
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
11
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
them when it is available. Each Trade is required to review the clashed model before the weekly (or other agreed upon) meeting and arrive at the meeting prepared to address the unresolved clashes in a constructive manner. Each trade is required to collaborate with each other through email, telephone, and in person to resolve basic clashes outside of the regularly scheduled coordination meeting times. It is expected that during said meetings, the team will address difficult areas/issues that are not coordinated between the multiple trades without the participation of McCarthy, Engineer, or Owner. Resolution to conflicts will be collectively agreed upon or directed by McCarthy, at any time, a trade may be identified as having to “relocate”. This trade will adjust the respective element(s) and re-post the model to the project cloud-coordination site the same day. All trades are responsible to update and post changes to models as necessary to accomplish the goals of this Trade Partner BIM Execution Plan (BExP) as directed by McCarthy. Each Trade is required; in addition to the development of coordinated models, to submit hard copies of their respective coordinated systems in a 2D format as required by the project documents and specifications for approval through the regular submittal process. All Trade Contractors are responsible for producing 2D coordinated drawings after resolving all clashes for a designated area. This file shall include all coordinated drawing information, full dimensions (especially elevation dimensions), text, tags, etc. in order to successfully install the systems in the field. Each Trade is required to maintain and provide their BIM with respect to generating record drawings/models. It is the responsibility of each trade to update their respective BIM throughout construction to reflect field conditions and any deviations from the signed off coordination drawings. McCarthy may require proof of record BIM’s as a condition for progress payment. Each Trade is required to update and post any changes originating from RFI’s, Submittals, and Bulletins. Each Trade making changes shall send a corresponding notice to the rest of the team indicating such changes and reasoning behind the change, within three working days from receipt of said changes. In the event a Trade Contractor fails to cooperate in the 3D Finite Trade Coordination Process, the Trade Contractor will be held responsible for all costs incurred to adjust to the work of others made necessary to accommodate the uncooperative Trade Contractor's installations. If a Trade Contractor chooses not to model certain elements those items must be coordinated in the field to not impede the signed off and approved coordinated systems; including all access zones, failure to do so will result in the non-modeling Trade Contractor being held responsible for all costs incurred to resolve the issue. 2. CHANGE MANAGEMENT PROCESS: Documenting/Resolving Changes to the Work Upon issuance of official changes to the Work by the Owner or Engineer, McCarthy and associated Trade Partners are to review the current Construction Coordination Trade Models against the updated Design-Intent Models. If the changes to the Work are significant enough to the extent that the revised design-intent requires modifications to the current 3D Trade Coordination effort, a BIM Re-Coordination Meeting hosted by McCarthy will take place to align updated design-intent with the 3D Trade Coordination effort. Each month, whether there are official changes to the Work or not, Trade Contractors are expected to have their most current coordination models posted to BIM360 for Design Reviews. The Engineer of Record will conduct a model alignment process to keep the Design-Intent Models relative to active coordination. This effort will not aim to capture every deviation or detail in the Trade models, rather only what is deemed significant for the ability to document changes to the Design-Intent relative to actual coordination/installation for record purposes. Upon issuance of official changes to the Work by the Owner or Engineer, the affected Trade Contractors are to review the change and update their model to reflect the new layout. New model files are to be posted to the project’s file sharing platform sites (BIM360, Revizto & Procore) within 10 days of the issuance of the change. Any clashes to work of others not directly affected by the change to be brought to the attention of McCarthy within the 10-day time frame. A BIM Re-Coordination Meeting will be set up by McCarthy for all affected trades to review the change. Cost associated with coordination time to be included in change order pricing. 3. MEETING PROCEDURES: Below outlines the typical 3D Trade Coordination meeting types and schedules: MEETING TYPE
PROJECT STAGE
FREQUENCY
PARTICIPANTS
LOCATION
VDC CORE TEAM KICK-OFF MEETING
DESIGN
ONE TIME
PROJECT TEAM
ON SITE/VIRTUAL
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
12
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
DESIGN PHASE COORDINATION MEETINGS
DESIGN
AS NEEDED
PROJECT TEAM
ON SITE/VIRTUAL
BIM FLY-THRU SESSIONS WITH CORE TEAM, USER GROUPS
CONSTRUCT
AS NEEDED
PROJECT TEAM
ON SITE/VIRTUAL
VDC TRADE PARTNER KICKOFF MEETINGS
CONSTRUCT
PER BID PACKAGE
PROJECT TEAM
ON SITE/VIRTUAL
CONSTRUCT PHASE COORDINATION MEETINGS
CONSTRUCT
AS NEEDED
McCarthy & Trade Partners (Engineer as needed)
ON SITE/VIRTUAL
BIM FLY-THRUS WITH CORE TEAM, USER GROUPS
CONSTRUCT
AS NEEDED
PROJECT TEAM
ON SITE/VIRTUAL
ANY OTHER BIM MEETINGS THAT OCCURS WITH MULTIPLE PARTIES
CONSTRUCT
AS NEEDED
PROJECT TEAM
ON SITE/VIRTUAL
VDC MONTHLY ALIGNMENT MEETINGS
CONSTRUCT
MONTHLY
CONSTRUCTION TEAM
ON SITE/VIRTUAL
PROJECT-SPECIFIC WEEKLY COORDINATION SCHEDULE BIM Coordination Meeting times, posting frequencies and schedule will be agreed upon at the coordination kickoff meeting. There are 3 types of coordination meeting styles to choose from: a.
b. c.
LOCKDOWN – BIM Coordination meetings will be conducted in consecutive all-day meetings until coordination has been completed. This process should be used if it’s determined that coordination will be required to be completed within a specific timeframe. Specific times, durations, and frequency per week to be established in detail between McCarthy and Trade Contractors. WEEKLY – coordination will be conducted on a weekly basis until coordination is complete. No single meeting should last more than 1 hour. For this method to succeed mechanical trade contractors and McCarthy Coordination Lead must communicate multiple times per week outside the weekly scheduled meeting. COMBINATION – A formula of Options a. and b. combined, as agreed upon between McCarthy and all Trade Contractors.
4. DIGITAL COLLABORATION AND EXCHANGE PROCEDURES McCarthy will utilize BIM360, Revizto and Procore for model collaboration, model management and contract drawing file exchange throughout the project, uploading files weekly and/or as needed. All project participants will utilize these construction technology platforms to share and collaborate with other team members through either web portal or local desktop applications. See descriptions below for further instructions on uses of these technology applications. AUTODESK BIM 360
BIM 360 will be the location for all working BIM files (Revit, Civil3D, etc.) All deliverables will be produced here. Bluebeam upload to be managed by McCarthy (refer to Bluebeam notes below). BIM 360 folder structure: “2D-3D Deliverables” a. Milestone submittals that go to the client will be produced here – then copied (archived) to BOX – they will then be uploaded (delivered) to BLUEBEAM for the client. These include models, PDFs, and any other record documents. “2D-3D Working Files” a. To be used as the collaboration folder for working BIM and PDFs. b. All subfolders should follow per discipline.
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
13
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
The BIM360 Project Administrator will manage access to files, permissions, and at the folder level. The folder structure will be set up initially with full view access to all Design models for all teams to take advantage of live linking. This will enable using shared or consumed models if a team prefers this workflow at any point in the production process. Each team will have full access to their own folder while all other companies will have view only permission. McCarthy cannot be held liable for any loss of work or file access as a result of using cloud-based hosting platforms as a service provided by any third party, nor guarantees against interruption in this service due to software updates or network instability.
REVIZTO
Revizto will be the integrated collaboration platform for 2D drawings, 3D BIM and Design Issue Management/Tracking coordination. Iterative coordination, markups and reviews will take place in Revizto as the Design Development progresses in both 2D and 3D – seamlessly allowing project participants to work in either visual orientation to progress and coordinate design aspects. Revizto will be the primary hub for issue tracking to drive design coordination responsibilities to completion at the end of 100% CDs. Revizto will also be the primary source of truth for the most current Federated Coordination Model as the project lives on into the Construction Phase.
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
14
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
PROCORE
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
PROCORE will be our repository for Field Construction data and correspondence. RFIs, Submittals, Approved Construction Documents, Sign-off Coordination Models and other Field Construction Related Items will be housed here.
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
15
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP) 5.
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
MODEL STRUCTURE/FILE NAMING CONVENTION:
BIM/CIM Deliverable Naming Structure Design-Intent BIMs Structural BIM KCUC-DESIGN-STD HVAC BIM KCUC-DESIGN-HVC Electrical BIM KCUC-DESIGN-ELC Plumbing BIM KCUC-DESIGN-PLB Fire Protection BIM KCUC-DESIGN-FPD Site/Civil CIM KCUC-DESIGN-CIVL Record Design-Intent BIMs Structural BIM tbd HVAC BIM tbd Electrical BIM tbd Plumbing BIM tbd Fire Protection BIM tbd Site/Civil CIM tbd Federated Coordination BIM Federated Model tbd Trade Coordination BIMs Structural Steel (SSC) KCUC-TRADE-SSC Structural Concrete (SCC) KCUC-TRADE-SCC Plumbing (PLC) KCUC-TRADE-PLC Electrical (ELC) KCUC-TRADE-ELC Fire Suppression (FSC) KCUC-TRADE-FSC HVAC (HVC) KCUC-TRADE-HVC Masonry (MAC) KCUC-TRADE-MAC Instrumentation & Controls (ICC) KCUC-TRADE-ICC Medical Gas (MG) KCUC-TRADE-MG Site Utilities (SU) KCUC-TRADE-SU Low Voltage BIMs (Security) KCUC-TRADE-SECURITY Misc. Metals (MMC) KCUC-TRADE-MMC As-Built Trade BIMs Structural Steel (SSC) tbd Structural Concrete (SCC) tbd Plumbing (PLC) tbd Electrical (ELC) tbd Fire Suppression (FSC) tbd HVAC (HVC) tbd Masonry (MAC) tbd Instrumentation & Controls (ICC) tbd Building Trades (ROC, WSC, DHC) tbd Low Voltage BIMs (Security) tbd Misc. Metals (MMC) tbd
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
16
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
SECTION I: POINT OF ORIGIN/PROJECT CONTROL SETUP Project Digital Control To eliminate typical project origin issues, we have developed the below to explain model origin and rotation, and how to use the Shared Reference Point Revit Add-In to reassign the project’s site location and ensure all project model content is aligned with all other parties within all model environments. We will define two (2) reference points utilizing Autodesk Revit and Autodesk Civil 3D platforms to align model-world with real-world coordinates: 1). Survey Point (located using the Site Survey of Record) The Survey Point represents a known point in the physical world, such as a geodetic survey marker. The survey point is used to correctly orient the building geometry in another coordinate system, such as the coordinate system used in a civil engineering application. 2). Project Base Point (located using a primary building/structure as reference) The Project Base Point defines the origin (0,0,0) of the project coordinate system. It also can be used to position the building on the site and for locating the design elements of a building during construction. Spot coordinates and spot elevations that reference the project coordinate system are displayed relative to this point. *Revit Origin (important for reference)* The Revit Origin is the invisible 0,0,0 point in Revit that cannot be moved but that you also cannot see. The coordinates of other two points are relative to this location. SURVEY POINT All models for the project will maintain a shared coordinate system. The shared Survey Point is at Permanent Control Point No. 1 per the campus survey (Local Ground Coordinates) verified by McCarthy. The Survey Point values will be the same for all buildings on the site:
Real World Coordinates North/South TBD East/West TBD Elevation TBD Angle to True North TBD PROJECT BASE POINT All models for the project will maintain a shared coordinate system and will align to a common Project Base Point within the master Design Model’s building footprint. After the Survey Point has been adjusted as outlined above, the Project Base Point will be set: Building Name
Gridline Location of Project Base Point
Elevation of Project Base Point
TBD
xx and xx
xxx.xx
Project Site/Building Control Setup: DESIGN Phase: The Project Engineer of Record shall work with McCarthy and the Civil Engineer and/or the Project Survey crew to establish benchmarks and local control points based off survey information. This will establish site control in state plane coordinates. Design-Intent Models will be set to and based off this site control. CONSTRUCT Phase: A Pre-Construction Meeting will occur with all Project Team members involved to review site control, building control and Robotic Total Station layout points/benchmarks/monuments prior to the installation of any work. McCarthy will take the lead on establishing building control, based on site control coordinates, for all Trade
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
17
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
Contractors to base their work off through the use of total stations/digital layout technology. The Project’s record site and building control points documented through a master Civil3D model file and .csv file shall govern throughout the course of the Project. Any digital or manual field control that deviates from the master control files shall be the responsibility of any Trade Contractor to the extent such control impacts McCarthy or any other Trade Contractors.
SECTION J: COORDINATION DELIVERABLES All Trade Contractors participating in the 3D Trade Coordination effort are required to submit coordination deliverables as assigned. Coordination Deliverables may be in the form of 3D model files, PDFs, or other media that convey the intent of building systems coordination to other parties for review and/or approval.
☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒
SCOPE OF WORK BIM Coordination Schedule Activities Project Digital Control Setup Information Exchange (BIM360, Revizto) Superstructure Placement Drawings* Horiz./Vert. Slab Penetration Drawings Laser Scanning Verification of Concrete Record Drawings & Models Detailed Coordination Drawings** 3D Coordination Models As-Built 3D Record Drawings & Models Facility Asset Data (BIM & Non-BIM)
DELIVERABLE OWED McCarthy McCarthy McCarthy Concrete, Masonry Contractors All Trade Partners Structural Concrete Contractor TreanorHL All Trade Partners All Trade Partners All Trade Partners McCarthy + Select Trade Partners
PARTICIPANTS All Trade Partners All Trade Partners All Trade Partners All Trade Partners All Trade Partners All Trade Partners Design Team All Trade Partners All Trade Partners All Trade Partners All Trade Partners
Notes: * - It will be the responsibility of all Trade Contractors to provide slab, wall, and deck penetrations for all concrete and masonry structures. ** - Detailed Coordination Drawing process will follow the 7-Step 3D Coordination Sign-off Process as outlined in Section M.
SECTION K: BIM COORDINATION SCHEDULE 1.
The coordination team shall agree on a coordination schedule based on the Bid Package Milestone Dates and McCarthy scheduling practices. This coordination schedule should consider delivery and long lead items of all trade contractors involved in the coordination process. The coordination schedule is a guide and the overall project schedule will determine completion date for coordination. If for any reason schedule is not maintained, default trade contractor(s) will assume responsibility as per their Subcontract Agreement and Subcontract Addendum. Coordination Meetings may also require one of or any combination of the coordination meeting styles and frequencies to accommodate the Bid Package Milestone Dates and coordination schedule.
2.
The final list of drawings and the coordination drawing schedule will be agreed upon by all trade contractors and updates to the same, shall be binding on the trade contractors. Manpower, equipment, and material adjustments as necessary to meet the coordination schedule as created by the project team members is the responsibility of each trade contractor.
SECTION L: BUILDING SYSTEMS COORDINATION 3D Trade Coordination Hierarchy McCarthy uses a standard hierarchy approach to manage the 3D Trade Coordination Process. Below outlines the Clash Detection hierarchy for batching and review of trade models: (by level/area as determined at the VDC/BIM Kickoff Meeting) 1). STRUCTURAL vs. ALL -Building Structure (Concrete Foundations/SOG/Basement Walls, Columns, Base Plates, Anchor Bolts) -Building Structure (Elevated Concrete Decks/Walls, Fabrication Level Structural Steel System, Stairs) -Embeds (for riser systems, exterior skin systems, structural, window washing system, etc.)
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
18
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
-All Architectural shaft walls, bottom of shaft conditions, and equipment room walls -Miscellaneous Steel Kickers, Plates, Gussets, etc. -Miscellaneous Metals (Medical Equipment Supports, AV Supports, Toilet Partition Supports, etc.) 2). ARCHITECTURAL vs. ALL - All Critical Framing at shaft walls, bottom of shaft conditions, and equipment room walls -Critical Framing (King/Jamb Studs, Kickers, Headers, Top Track No Fly, Bottom Track No Fly, Hard Lid Ceiling No Fly, Soffit Framing, Compression Posts as required for seismic, Joists) -Acoustical Ceiling Systems (Grid, Compression Posts as required for seismic, No Fly Zone) -Equipment locations critical for Architectural coordination and placement. 3). PLBG vs. ALL (HVAC, MPIPE, MG, FP, ELEC/TECH/FA/SEC) -Gravity Systems (Waste, Vent, Storm) -Plumbing Pressure Systems (Mains, Trapeze Assemblies, Branch Lines and Shutoff Valves) -Plumbing Pressure Systems (Branch Lines from Shutoff Valve to fixtures) 4). HVAC vs. ALL (MPIPE, MG, FP, ELEC/TECH/FA/SEC) -HVAC Dry (Supply/Return/Exhaust Main Duct Runs to/from associated Equipment, Supply/Return/Exhaust Branch Duct to/from All Terminal Units inclusive of actual Terminal Units, and all required Insulation) -HVAC Dry (Supply/Return/Exhaust Branch Duct from All Terminal Units to Diffuser/Registers, and all required Insulation) 5). MPIPE vs. ALL (MG, FP, ELEC/TECH/FA/SEC) -HVAC Wet Systems (Mains, Trapeze Assemblies, BMS Control Boxes) -HVAC Wet Systems (Branch Lines to Coil Connections) 6). MG vs. ALL (FP, ELEC/TECH/FA/SEC) -MG piping, clearances, access zones & panels, racks, etc. 7). FP vs. ALL (ELEC/TECH/FA/SEC) -Fire Protection Mains, Risers, Standpipes, Pumps, Panels, Equipment -Siamese Connections, Hose Valve Cabinets, Branches -Arm Overs, Final Drops, Heads 8). ELEC/TECH/FA/SEC) -Lighting Fixtures, FA Fixtures, TECH Fixtures, SECURTY Fixtures -Power Systems (Trapeze Assemblies, Branch Conduit to Pull Boxes/Panels inclusive of Pull Boxes/Panels) -Low Voltage Primary Systems (All Cable Tray, and Main J-Hook runs if cable tray not used, any hard piping mains required above hard lids) -Low Voltage Branch Systems (All other J-Hook assemblies to furthest point of distribution) -Power Systems (Distribution Conduit from Pull Boxes/Panels to final termination point inclusive of wall/ceiling/floor/fixture devices to which you are connecting) Clash Testing/Clash Grouping Process The McCarthy VDC Manager is responsible for setting up the initial Clash Tests and Clash Groups in the clash detection software. The Clash Tests will be similar to the list above, regardless of which software is being utilized, and will be project-specific depending on the systems being coordinated. Every trade is responsible for communicating and resolving their own clashes identified by the Clash Testing and Clash Grouping exercises.
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
19
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
Tag Process Not everything is solved with clash detection. Complete reliance on that tool underutilizes the power of the coordination software and may cause rework in the field. To minimize this, the McCarthy VDC Manager and/or Project Engineer will perform visual Constructability Reviews of the federated coordination model each week to identify items “beyond the clash”. These are items related to things like, fire rating issues with multiple penetrations, pipes out of walls, code issues, access issues for installation and maintenance, or potential clashes for content that has not been bought out or is not in the model. Every Trade Contractor is responsible for reviewing his/her folders prior to the scheduled coordination meetings. If an item cannot be resolved at the coordination meeting then that issue needs to be drafted onto the Design Issues Log or an RFI. See the example of Review Folders to the right: Trade/System Colors While Trade Contractors can use their standards established by their firm, we will establish a Navisworks Appearance Profiler Color Scheme for each trade system and other model systems in order to facilitate effective 3D Trade Coordination. The Appearance Profiler color settings will be determined in the initial BIM Kickoff Meeting. Typical Corridor Construction Template It is important to establish typical “fly zones” for installation of work. This creates a proactive efficient process not only for modeling but also for the lifecycle cost of the building. The McCarthy VDC Manager and Project Manager will review the Typical Corridor Construction Template with the team at the BIM Kickoff to determine the approach to hierarchy and placement of building systems pathways. Depending on the team’s knowledge of the documents and scope of work, the template can be agreed to at the BIM Kickoff or agreed to after the BIM Kickoff but prior to creation of overhead model content. See examples below:
SECTION M: COORDINATION SIGN-OFF PROCESS 1.
2. 3. 4.
5.
Area/Model Signoff: We will conduct a “Substantial Sign-off Process” when all coordination team members are satisfied that coordination conflicts have been adequately resolved for the Engineer Review process to occur. All trade contractors involved in the coordination process shall sign McCarthy’s standard 3D Trade Coordination Sign-off Sheet for each completed coordination area. A “BIM Fly-thru Meeting” will be scheduled with the Engineering Team and Owner to review the sign-off models in Navisworks for conformance to design-intent, maintenance accessibility and serviceability. Post-Meeting, Trade Contractors will submit Coordination Drawings for Engineer Review. During and post-Engineer Review Process, Trade Contractors must address any/all comments returned both in PDF format and Model format prior to the start of pre-fabrication. Formal written documentation must be captured for all Engineer Review comments stating the comments have been addressed and satisfy the needs of the Construction Documents. If the trade contractor is utilizing pre-fabrication, the trade contractor must receive coordination drawing approval or approval from McCarthy in writing prior to any pre-fabrication to prevent rework or installation of non-compliant work. Authorized representatives are to be designated by each trade contractor and approved by McCarthy. Post-3D coordination signoff, each trade contractor is required to bring physical drawings to be signed by all other coordination team members. Each trade contractor is responsible for reproduction costs associated with production of hard copy drawings for sign-off.
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
20
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP) 6.
7. 8. 9.
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
Sign-off of the 2D drawings extracted from the coordinated model shall signify the trade contractor’s intention to complete installation as indicated on the coordination drawing. Each trade contractor shall be responsible for locating their respective components as shown on the 3D model and field installation drawings. Field installation conflicts will be resolved by the affected party at the direction of McCarthy with no additional cost to McCarthy or the Owner. The signed documents will remain in McCarthy’s possession. Each trade contractor will provide all other parties involved in the coordination process a copy of their completed documents. This can either be a hard or digital copy, depending on which type is preferred by each trade contractor. Each trade contractor shall submit one copy of each of their respective coordination drawings to the Engineer for review and approval. Trade Detail Coordination Drawing Submission Protocol for Engineer Review: Step 1: Coordination Reaches “Substantial Sign-off for Model Conflicts” Step 2: BIM Fly-thru Meeting with Owner and Engineer to review Model Step 3: Trades produce first pass Detailed Coordination Drawings for Engineer Review Step 4: Bluebeam Studio Session for collaborative O/E/C Review of Trade Drawings Step 5: McCarthy & Trades address comments, revise Models/Drawings Step 6: Resubmit any Drawings for Record, revise Models and re-run for Conflicts Step 7: Final Sign-off / Begin Fabrication & Install Process Example Sign-off Sheet:
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
21
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
SECTION N: ATTACHMENTS/REFERENCES 1. 2. 3.
Current Link to AGC LOD Specification 2019 – http://bimforum.org/lod/ Current Project Milestone Schedule – reference McCarthy Subcontract Attachment A – LOD Matrix for BIM Deliverables v1.0
SECTION O: BIM EXECUTION PLAN AGREEMENT PAGE
TRADE PARTNER PROJECT BIM EXECUTION PLAN (BExP) AGREEMENT Kansas City Urology Care Therapy Center By signature below, this Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP) is herewith acknowledged, understood, adopted, and incorporated into the BIM Project Deliverables. This agreement is dated as of _______________ for Design & Construction Services between the below signed companies.
_______________________________________________________________
_____________________
Kansas City Urology Care – Owner’s Rep
Date
_______________________________________________________________
_____________________
McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. – CM-at-Risk
Date
_______________________________________________________________
_____________________
TreanorHL – Engineer of Record
Date
_______________________________________________________________
_____________________
TBD – Plumbing Trade Contractor
Date
_______________________________________________________________
_____________________
TBD – Fire Suppression Trade Contractor
Date
_______________________________________________________________
_____________________
TBD – Structural Steel Trade Contractor
Date
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
22
Project BIM Execution Plan (BExP)
2021.06.29 / Version 1.0
______________________________________________________________
_____________________
TBD – Electrical Trade Contractor
Date
_______________________________________________________________
_____________________
TBD – Low Voltage Security Contractor
Date
_______________________________________________________________
_____________________
TBD – HVAC/HVAC Controls Trade Contractor
Date
_______________________________________________________________
_____________________
TBD – Masonry Trade Contractor
Date
_______________________________________________________________
_____________________
TBD – Misc. Metals Trade Contractor
Date
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING EXECUTION PLAN (BEXP)
23
Kansas City Urology Care
Overview
LOD Matrix for BIM Deliverables
LOD Matrix for BIM Deliverables v1.0 Summary: This document is intended to setforth the minimum modeling requirements for Building Information Models (BIMs) on a per project basis as detailed within the LOD Matrix and LOD Notes. LOD is sometimes interpreted as Level of Detail rather than Level of Development. This document uses the concept of Level of Development . There are important differences. Level of Development is the degree to which the element’s geometry and attached information has been thought through – the degree to which project team members may rely on the information when using the model. Level of Detail is essentially how much detail is included in the model element. In essence, Level of Detail can be thought of as input to the element, while Level of Development is reliable output.
Fundamental LOD Definitions (based on the BIMForum LOD Specification 2019 Version): LOD 100 The Model Element may be graphically represented in the Model with a symbol or other generic representation, but does not satisfy the requirements for LOD 200. Information related to the Model Element (i.e. cost per square foot, ton-nage of HVAC, etc.) can be derived from other Model Elements. LOD 200 The Model Element is graphically represented within the Model as a generic system, object, or assembly with approximate quantities, size, shape, location, and orientation. Non-graphic information may also be attached to the Model Element. LOD 300 The Model Element is graphically represented within the Model as a specific system, object or assembly in terms of quantity, size, shape, location, and orientation. Non-graphic information may also be attached to the Model Element. LOD 350 The Model Element is graphically represented within the Model as a specific system, object, or assembly in terms of quantity, size, shape, orientation, and interfaces with other building systems. Non-graphic information may also be attached to the Model Element. LOD 400 The Model Element is graphically represented within the Model as a specific system, object or assembly in terms of size, shape, location, quantity, and orientation with detailing, fabrication, assembly, and installation information. Non-graphic information may also be attached to the Model Element. LOD 500 Compatible with Record Models, As-Built Models for Closeout/Handover Phase BIMForum interpretation: Since LOD 500 relates to field verification and is not an indication of progression to a higher level of model element geometry or non-graphic information, the BIMForum LOD Specification does not define or illustrate it. The below definition of LOD 500 is specific to McCarthy’s expectations after 100% Construction Documents and post-Trade Coordination sign-off for model maintenance. LOD 500A Relative to Maintaining Record Design-Intent Models:Representative of the Record Design-Intent Models being maintained with any official changes to the Work, through Substantial Completion. Field Verification of the Record Design-Intent is not a direct requirement of the Design Team’s Record models. LOD 500A is typically the responsibility of the Engineer of Record (DOR) for that designated scope of work per the LOD Matrix of BIM Deliverables. LOD 500B Relative to Maintaining As-Coordinated Models:Representative of the As-Coordinated Trade Contractor models being maintained, inclusive of any official changes to the Work, through Substantial Completion. Trade Contractors are to ensure any post-signoff model/drawing changes do not impact other Trade Contractors respective to their Work. LOD 500B is typically the responsibility of the Trade Contractor for that designated scope of work per the LOD Matrix of BIM Deliverables. LOD 500C Relative to As-Built Models/Field Verification:Representative of the As-Built Trade Contractor models matching final construction conditions, inclusive of any official changes to the Work, through Substantial Completion. Field Verification of the Trade Contractor’s model and drawing files aligning to produce their final As-Builts. LOD 500C is typically the responsibility of the Trade Contractor for that designated scope of work per the LOD Matrix of BIM Deliverables.
General Notes: There is no such thing as an "LOD xxx" model. LOD refers to model elements using the CSI Uniformat's organizational structure by system classification and subsystem, etc. Model elements that have been assigned a Level of Development (LOD) represent the minimum deliverable requirement for the Owner. All other cells should be completed by the Design and Construct teams. Additional project specific comments along with any additions and/or exclusions to the minimum LOD should be cited in the “Notes” column and further defined in the LOD Notes tab. The Facility Data & Asset Tag column cites which UniFormat categories are required to have additional data associated with them, while the Project BIM Execution Plan BIM will outline the required spatial and asset information to be included in the project deliverables. LOD 350's primary distinction between itself and LOD 300 is the "adjacencies/interfaces with other building systems" and infers that the design-intent has been relatively coordinated within the given spatial parameters of the building/site's design.
Organization
Model Element Author
Organization tbd
SSC
Subsurface Site Utilities Contractor Structural Steel Contractor
BDC
SCC
Structural Concrete Contractor
tbd
Plumbing Engineer
PEC
PLC
Plumbing Contractor
tbd
HVD
HVAC Engineer
PEC
HVC
HVAC Contractor
tbd
FPD
Fire Protection Engineer
PEC
FPC
Fire Protection Contractor
tbd
ELD
Electrical Engineer
PEC
ELC
Electrical Contractor
tbd
CMA/CMR
Construction Manager
McCarthy Building Companies
ELV
Low Voltage Contractor
tbd
FRC
Framing Contractor
tbd
HCC
HVAC Controls Contractor
tbd
MSC
Misc. Supports Contractor
tbd
Abbreviation
Model Element Author
OWN
Owner
AOR
Architect
TreanorHL
STD
Structural Engineer
PLD
Kansas City Urology Care
KCUC
Abbreviation SSU
Proton Therapy
tbd
Page 1 of 1
