WARMSWORTH HALL BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RISKRATINGDEFINITION
Property Address:HighRoad,Warmsworth,Doncaster,DN49UX
SurveyorName:NicolaCulliford
ReportDate:7thJanuary2022
Email:N.Culliford3224@student.leedsbeckett.ac.uk
●Material/CriticalIssue–Clarificationorresolutionrequiredpriortoproceedingwith acquisition
●ImportantIssue–Tobeconsideredaspartofdecisiontoproceedandresolvedpost acquisition
●NoCurrentorMinorIssue–Informativewithnofurtheractionconsiderednecessary priortoproceedingwithacquisition
Heritage Thehallisoflocalhistoricsignificance,beingGradeIIlisted and subject to conditions and restrictions relating to repair, renovation and development.
Heritage specialists and local conservation officers should be consulted before consideration of remedial or improvement works.
Services Utility services and infrastructure have not been inspected aspartofthisreportandshouldbefullysurveyedtoidentify condition and defects.
Legalities Detailed land registry searches are advised to fully determine property titles, charges and boundaries.
1
ITEMCOMMENTARYRISKRATING GENERAL
●
●
●
STRUCTURE
Foundations Type, depth and condition requires validation via inspection; however, no external evidence of structural instability is noted.
Stone Walls South and west plinths require repair. Stonework and mortar pointing is aesthetically sound; however, validation of mortar compositionand application is recommended.
Rendered Walls Type and condition of north and east wall structure is concealedandunconfirmed.Rendertonorthandeastwalls is cracked and aesthetically poor. Debonding is to be eliminated and renovation is required.
ROOF
Surface Undulation
Undulation is visible to west and south slopes, indicating possible structural defects. Inspection is recommended.
Slates Stone roof slates appear in fair repair for age. Slippedandcrackedslatesareevidentandrequireremedy. Missing slates below north/south ridge are in need of replacement.
Valleys/Ridges Ridge mortar is eroded in places and inspection is advised to valley to main and extension slopes (east side).
Stone Gutters Leaking is evident at stone gutter joints to larger north extension, presumed via lead lining.
Cast Iron Goods Cast iron gutters and downpipes require cosmetic renovation and functional inspection, though no significant defects are visible.
Chimneys (x3) Use and condition of flues is unknown.
Structuralconditionisconcealedbyfullrender;however,no obvioussignsofinstabilityareevident.Repairsarerequired to mortar fillets and inspection is advised to render and cornice at right side north/south stack.
Flat Roof Smallflatroof coveringtonorth side is puddling. Inspection is recommended to diagnose cause and determine repair.
2
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
ELEVATIONS
Ashlar Features Dressed stone to openings and building features appears in fairrepair;however,inspection and appropriate remedial work is advised to specific instances of deterioration/damage to porches (south and west), window reveals (south) and sillstones (east).
External Sashes Windows to all elevations are consistent in design and appear in generally fair repair for age; however suspected wet rot and woodworm are evident and require inspection, diagnosis and remedial works.
Air Vent
INTERIOR
External seal appears absent to east side air vent and internal inspection/sealing is required to water ingress.
Finishings Visiblewall,ceilingandfloorcoveringsappeartohavebeen well maintained overall and are sympathetic to property character.
Visible Damp Serviceleaksand/orrainpenetrationaresuspectedcauses ofdampevidenttoisolatedareasofreception,stairwayand landing.
Diagnostic inspection is required to determine extent and appropriate remedial works.
Rising Damp Damage and rot are evident to timber skirting with staining to wall surface above. Inspection of surrounding floor and wall structure is required to eliminate rising damp.
Attic Space This is noted as in visibly poor condition versus general property repair.
Original lime and later plaster surface coverings display degradation and surface damp and are likely to require significant renovation.
Rooftimbersaredeterioratedinplaceswithevidenceofwet rot, damp and woodworm. Full structural inspection is advised to determine condition and validate stability.
Safe access to maintain service pipes and cables is unconfirmed.
3
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
EXTERIOR
Hard Landscaping
Tarmac/Asphalt Surfaces
Itisnotedthat parkingsurfacesandconcretepathwaysare not in keeping with property character and aesthetic. Consideration of appropriate replacement is suggested as part of future works.
Remedial works are required to parking and road surfaces where deterioration and pot holes are present.
Boundary Walls Timber and metal entrance gates require regular maintenance but appear in fair repair.
Areas of stonework, pointing and coping to external and internal faces of boundary walls are significantly deteriorated and require inspection of stability and appropriate remedial works.
Bell Tower Abelltowerto theGlebeStreetentranceisnotedasGrade II listed (as per the main hall) and in apparent fair repairfor age; however structural inspection is advised to determine condition.
Stepped Access Minor repairs are required to high and low-rise steps providing access between main hall and neighbouring hotel.
Footpaths Isolated repairs are required to damaged concrete paths around grounds and paving slabs to the hall’s north and east perimeter.
Tree Management
Canopies and roots of mature trees are potentially impacting surface and sub surface condition of hard landscaping. TPOs are in place and local tree/landscape officers should be consulted for remedial advice.
Site Pond A large pond to the south of the grounds contributes an attractive outdoor feature; however, a wildlife and biodiversity survey is recommended to establish condition and appropriate maintenance works.
Safety signage requires reinstatement.
4
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
2. INSTRUCTIONSAND INSPECTION
2.1.Instructions
InstructionisforanoverviewbuildinginspectionofWarmsworthHall,Doncaster, includingsummaryofinternalandexternalconditionandremedial recommendations.
2.2.InspectionDetails
Inspectionisviadesktop,usingprovidedimagesoftheoccupied,furnished propertyduringdryweather.
2.3. Limitations of Survey
Reported details and defects are as visible via images. On-site inspection is recommended to validate findings. Conservation specialists should be engaged before authorising remedial works.
2.4. Condition Definitions
Conditions described in the report indicate the following:
DEFINITIONDESCRIPTION
Good No significant defects. Not damaged or deteriorated and able to performthefunctionfor whichitwasinstalled.Willrequireroutine maintenancearisingthroughnormalwearandtear.
Fair Subject to several years wear, but still serviceable and functioning adequately. Will require repair or substantial replacement in the medium term (approximately 2-5 years)
PoorSubjecttohardorlong-termwearwithrepairsand/orrenovation generallynecessary.Willrequirerepairorsubstantialreplacement intheshortterm(approximately1–2years)
Hazardous Significant life safety or hazard to health risk requiring immediate rectification to comply withStatutoryRegulations.
5
4. CONDITION AND DEFECTS
4.1.Sub-Structure
4.1.1 Foundations
Foundations are not surveyed. Construction pre dates building regulation (UWE, 2009) and is presumed stepped stone/rubble foundations without damp proof course (DPC). There is no indication of retrospective DPC to main elevations. DPC is assumed but concealed to north extensions.
Geotechnical inspection via hand dig, trial pit or alternative excavation can establish foundation depth and type (BRE, 2002, pp.5-6).
4.1.2 Above Ground Sub Structure
South and west plinths appear in poor condition, displaying extensive mortar repairs. Exposed stone is eroded from weather exposure and, potentially, cement mortar. This requires analysis of composition and risk to limestone (Ingham, 2014). Removal and replacement with appropriate lime mortar and/or repair to exposed stone may be required (CADW, 2003).
StonePlinths
Ashlar plinths to north extensions appear in good repair with staining and algae as expected for age/function.
Low level render to north and east is in poor condition. Damp and spalling are evident and detrimental to building aesthetic, compounded by repair works. Internal walls require inspection to eliminate moisture penetration. Repair is recommended to negate further deterioration.
AshlarPlinthsandRender
10
No signs of sub structure failure are evident. Openings/detailing appear level (BRE, 1990, p.17). Structural Inspection is recommended to validate this and eliminate latent condition/stability issues (BRE, 2014, p.4).
4.2.MainStructure
4.2.1 Exposed Stone Structure
Original stonework appears repointed. Protruding finish may indicate poor application and workmanship (Ingham, 2014, pp.2-3).
ExamplePointing
Areas of stonework are in poor condition through erosion and spalling from weather exposure/frost damage. Flaws may pre date repointing, or subsequently result from cement-based mortar. (CADW, 2003, p.3).
StoneDamage
Mortar analysis is recommended to verify composition, application method and advise remedial action where risk to stonework is determined. Local heritage officers should be consulted where repointing is considered. (BSI, 2013, p.24).
4.2.2 Rendered Elevations
Wallcompositionandconditionbeneathrenderisunconfirmed.
Renderto north appears in fair repair, though water staining isevident below gutters to the larger extensionand at groundlevelto entrancedoor.Conditionof rainwater goods is noted in section 4.3. Inspection of internal walls is advised to eliminate moisture penetration.
11
Render to east appears in poor repair with cracking around openings, potentially a symptom of shrinkage/movement inmainstructure (ConcreteSociety, 2016).Survey is advised to monitor expansion and expose any de-bonding (English Heritage, 2012).
Render is likely cement composition and potentially detrimental to limestone; a considerationoncecompositionofmainstructurehasbeendetermined(SPAB,2020). Subject to survey, cracks require repair with appropriate filler and redecoration is advised to enhance protection and improve appearance (BRE, 1995, p.3).
4.3.1 Roof Coverings
Conditionofroofslopesandridgesappearsfair,thoughspecificissuesarenoted:
Surfaceundulationisapparenttosouthandwestslopes,potentiallyindicating degradedtimberrafters/roofstructuredefects.Inspectionisadvisedtodetermine causeandcondition(BSI,2013,p.21).
Heritagestatusandfeaturesshouldinformanyremedialaction(HistoricEngland, 1998,p.6).
12
4.3.RoofsandRainwaterGoods
RenderStaining
RenderDamage
Crackedandslippedslatesareevidenttonorthandeastslopes.Missingslates belownorth/southridgeareexposingmortarandriskingwateringress.Defects arelikelyfromweatherdamage,fixingscorrosionordisturbanceduringrepair works.
Damaged/missingslatesrequirereplacement.Appropriateaestheticand materialmatchshouldbesoughttomaintaincharacteranddurability.Newslates shouldbesourcedwherepossibleinpreferencetoreclaimed(HistoricEngland 1998,pp.7-8).
Ridgejointsareerodedinplacesandrequirerepairforweatherprotection.Valley betweennorthroofslopesisconcealedbutappearsinpoorcondition.External andinternalinspectionisadvisedtovalidateandidentifyrepairs(Harrison& Trotman,2009,p112).
4.3.2 Chimneys
Singlestacktowestanddualstackstonorth/southridgearerenderedandpresumed solidstoneconstruction. Conditionappearsfairwithnoevidenceofstructuraldefect.
Chimney use is unconfirmed. A full inspection is advised to determine condition of flues, pots and caps as well as working fire connections. Mortar fillets at abutments are deteriorating and in poor condition. Repair is required to protect exposed stack androofjointsfromdamage/wateringress,withreplacementinlimemortarifexisting application is cement based (ibid, pp.111-112) .
13
Slate Damage
RoofUndulation
WestChimney
Surface cracking is evident to render and cornice of the right-side north/south stack, requiring inspection to eliminate de bonding and structural defects.
Tominimisefuturerepair,annualinspectionandmaintenanceofexternalroof areas,includingchimneys,isrecommendedtoaddressemergingdefects (HistoricEngland,1998,p.6).
4.3.3 Rainwater Goods
Guttersarepresumedleadlinedstonetosouthandwest,castirontonorthand east,withpaintedcastirondownpipes.Protectiveguardsarepresentandingood condition.
Downpipestosouthandwestareinpoorrepairwithpeelingpaintandrusting. Strippingandrepainting,orreplacementwhereunsalvageable,issuggestedto minimisedeterioration.
‘Crestedwaterheads’(HistoricEngland,2021)tosouthandwestareofhistoric significanceandappearingoodrepair.Theseshouldbemonitoredaspartof scheduledinspectionstoprotectcondition.
Goodsinstalledtorenderedelevationsareinfairaestheticrepair.Regular maintenancetopreventpaintdeterioration,wateringressandrustis recommendedtopreservestandards.
14
DownpipeSurfaces
Original‘CrestedWaterhead’
Significantstainingisevidenttolargenorthextensionrender.Waterappears leakingthroughgutterliningandstoneworkjoints.Inspectionand repair/replacementofliningisadvisedalongwithrendercleaningtoimprove appearance.
Inspectionduringrainfallisrecommendedtovalidatefunctionalconditionof rainwatergoods.Atleastonedrainispartiallycoveredbygravel.Installationof protectiveguardsisadvised(Thomasetal.,1992,p.5).
4.4.1 Stone dressing
The property is dressed in ashlar limestone, appearing in fair repair overall. Specific defects areevident:
15
4.4.Elevations
Gutter Leak
Drain Debris
South porch shows signs of poor repair, including patination, spalling and erosion to overhead panel, pillars and rear columns from weather exposure and subsequent frost/chemicalattack(BRE,2007).Far-right columnjunctionshowssignificanterosion to frontedge.Laterporchadditiontothewestappearsinfairrepair;however,stoneto lower door surround is eroded, potentially from historic patching.
Defects require closer inspection to eliminate structural impact and advise approach to repair (BSI, 2013, pp.20-23).
StonePorchDamage
Coverings to porch roofs appear in good repair, though upper surface condition is not confirmed.Delaminationisapparenttosouthsidewindowreveals,likelyfromweather damage. Primary and secondary causes should be identified to determine remedial action (Watt, 2013, pp.214-215).
An eaststonesillisinpoorcondition withdeteriorationfromfrostand/orconstruction damage.Silljointsareexposedandvulnerabletowateringress. Thisrequiresrepair or replacement to match existing.
Surround and Sill Damage
16
4.4.2
Timber Features
Instances of poor condition and ineffective maintenance are evidenced by flaking paint, degraded timber and damaged putty to individual south and west sashes (Hinks & Cook, 2002, pp.139-142) (Marshall et al., 2013, pp.305-305).
Inspection is recommended to assess timber condition, with repair/replacement of degraded areas and refinishing in appropriate materials (2013, p.303). Remaining windows require prioritisation by condition and inspection/renovation within the next two years (BSI 2013, pp.28-29).
Flight holes and wet rot are visible to a south facing sash, indicating presence of woodworm. Inspection is necessary to eliminate live infestation, advise remedial works and manage moisture levels (Bravery et al., 2010, pp.115-117) (BSI, 2013, p24).
Repaired cornice to north roof junction is in poor condition with exposed timber vulnerable to water penetration and rot. Affected sections required or replacement using suitablematerials and breathable paint.
17
SashTimber
NorthCornice
4.4.3
Additional Elements
Seal is absent around a retrofitted air vent adjacent to the east entrance. Repair is required to eliminate risk of water ingress.
Water is ponding on a small flat roof to the north. Presumed covering is asphalt/felt butisnotconfirmed.Inspectionisadvisedtoeliminatestructuraldeflection/ineffective fall and advise remedy (Harrison et al., 2009, pp.164-165).
Internal finishes to ground and first floor appear well maintained and in fair repair; however, specific instances of poor condition require attention:
4.5.1
Floor Covering
Carpet edge ispoorlyfittedand frayed along joiningstripto themainentrance.This is vulnerable to further damage and presents a trip hazard. Damage with exposed gripper rods is also evident along skirting edge in the entrance hall/reception.
Carpets appear in good condition; therefore, repair is advised, or extension to timber/brass trimto secure damaged edges.
18
4.5.InternalAreas
EastVent
RoofPuddling
4.5.2 Walls and Ceilings
Instances of damp to entrance lobby, lounge, stairwell and landing indicate service pipe leaks and/or water ingress from external defects:
Staining is visible to ceiling and light fitting within the landing alcove. Disconnection is needed to avoid hazard. Inspection is required in the floorspace above, and external areas outside, to identify moisture source and determine appropriate repair (Thomas et al., 1992, p.4).
Damp is suspected to intermediate landing wall and window where staining and peeling are evident. Inspection above (attic), externally (rainwater goods) and behind paper covering is required to identify and remedy moisture source before repair of décor (ibid, p.5).
Moisture is evident at skirting and sockets to the reception lounge. Exposed external plinthjointsareapossiblecause.Inspectionisadvisedtoexternalwallsandrainwater goods to identify source and undertake repairs (BRE, 2016 p3) (BRE, 1990 p65). Removalofplasterbelowaffectedlevelmayberequiredtodryoutwallsurfacebefore refinishing.
19
DamagedCarpet
LandingandStairwell
Internal finishings should be considered in maintenance planning. Papers and nonbreathable paints can impede ventilation in older buildings without DPC (Stirling, 2002).
Timber skirting to ground floor corner is degraded with signs of wet rot (BRE, 1989, p.2). Floor and masonry inspection is required to measure moisture levels, identify source and eliminate presence of rising damp (ibid, p.10). Disruptive intervention (drilling) may be required to effectively diagnose (BRE, 2007, p.5). Timber may be salvagable if appropriate moisture levels can be returned (BSI, 2013, p.22).
Inspectionincludingsubsurfacemoistureleveltestingisrecommendedacrossinternal floors, walls and ceilings to eliminate further damp (BRE, 2016, p.4).
4.5.3 Internal Joinery
Surface finishes to internal windows, doors and skirtings appear in fair repair. Condition of joinery, including effective function of openings, cannot be confirmed without inspection. A specialist timber survey is recommended.
Paint finish is degraded and timber exposed to specific sash frames and sills, suggesting external water ingress or internal condensation. Inspection is advised to determineconditionofexposedtimberandpresenceoflivemoisturesources.Affected areas require repair/redecoration once condition is determined.
Damage and poor workmanship are evident to timber doorway surround at main reception entrance. Sanding, filling and redecoration is required to mitigate deterioration and improve appearance.
20
SkirtingDamage
MoistureStaining
4.5.4 Attic Space
The property’s attic space is unoccupied and in hazardous condition in parts:
Laterworkstotheroofareevidentwithfeltandreplacementraftersvisible.Remaining areas appear of original construction.
Rot and infestation are evident to roof timbers with significant deterioration in places, presenting risk to structural stability.
Timberrepairsto degradedtrussesappearsin goodcondition;however,effectiveness of design and workmanship requires validation.
Clearing of debris will enable full structural roof survey and schedule of remedial works. Inspection of timber condition is advised to diagnose infestation and rot type and determine appropriate mitigation/repair, including drying, treatment or replacement of affected areas (BRE, 1997, p.2-4).
Remains of original straw and lime finishing to floor, walls and ceiling are severely degraded,exposingfloor,dormerand roofstructurein places.Floorcoverings appear disturbed from access for service installation.
21
AtticTimbers
FrameDamage
SashDeterioration
Plastered dry lining to walls and ceilings is evident, showing signs of surface dampness and erosion.
Full inspection and moisture measurement of surfaces is advised to inform condition and remedial works. Removal of damaged lime and plaster surfaces may be required withreapplicationofsuitablecoveringsonceappropriatemoisturelevelsareachieved (BRE, 1988, p.4).
Defects indicate long term water ingress via defective roof covering/gutters, compounded by poor maintenance. Moisture sources should be identified and eliminated as part of remedial works.
Steel supports are retrofitted to accommodate heating/hot water installation. Electric cablesarevisible acrossfloorandrooftimbers.Bothrequiresafemeans ofaccessfor maintenance, with inspection of cables advised to identify those in use.
22
DegradedCoverings
4.5.5 Additional Elements
PipeInstallation
AtticPlaster
4.5.5 Additional Elements
Installation of second handrail to the stairwell fire exit is advised to meet commercial property standards (HMGOV, 2013, p.23) and optimise safety. Items presenting trip/access hazard should be cleared from the intermediate landing.
4.6.ExternalAreas
4.6.1 Hard Landscape
East, west boundaries and vehicle routes are hard surfaced with presumed asphalt/ tarmacadam and in poor condition. Deterioration and pot holes are evident resulting from weather exposure, trafficand temporary repairs.
A specialist contractor is required to assess quality and advise appropriate short term (filling) and longer term (resurfacing) repair options (Transport Research Laboratory, 2016).
Tarmac/AsphaltSurfaces
23
Ariel Site View (Google Maps, 2021)
Enclosed Stairwell
Concrete footpaths are poorly maintained with moss covering, compounded by overhangingtrees.Hazardouscrackingandupwardmovementareevident,potentially from surrounding tree roots. This presents serious trip hazard and repair/replacement to damaged sections is required.
Regular maintenance of footpaths and tree canopies is advised to minimise debris. Perimeter pathways are of concrete slab and cobblestone, appearing in fair condition. Cracks to slabs are evident and require replacement along with inspection of sub surface condition.
Tarmac and concrete surfaces are not in keeping with hall aesthetic. Consideration is advisedoflong term replacement withpermeablealternative, toenhanceappearance and surface drainage (Susdrain, 2021)
Site steps are in fair condition. Maintenance is required to reinstate anti slip nosing paint,repairorreplacedamagedcopingandtreadslabs,andrenovatehandrail.Fitting of a second handrail is advised to larger steps.
AccessSteps
24
ConcreteFootpaths
4.6.2 Boundaries and Entrances
Site boundary is contained by metal fencing (south) and stone walling (north, east, west).
TimbergatesalongQuakerLaneareinpooraestheticrepair.Overhangingvegetation is contributing to algae/moss growth. Lower edges display rot and deterioration, though condition cannot be confirmed without closer inspection. Removal of staining and repair/redecoration is required to protect surface and prevent deterioration.
EntranceGates
Metal gates at Glebe Street appear in good condition, though suspected fracture to right-side stone post requires inspection. Repair should be undertaken to replace /resurface in keeping with renovated neighbouring post (BSI, 2013, p.23).
Areas of boundary wall appear in hazardous condition and require remedial action. Coping slates appear degraded and unstable to a car park return. Resecuring/replacement is advised to eliminate risk of damage/injury.
BoundaryWalls
Ponting and coping mortar are degraded across a low wall adjoining Glebe Street boundary,withstonesmissing/displaced.Adjacentstoneworktotheboundaryjunction is in similarly poor condition, potentially from weight of surrounding properties and/or historic infill/repair.
Internal wall surfaces are deteriorated. Mortar is missing and stonework unstable. Inconsistency in mortar colour/application suggests previous repair. Quality of materials, workmanship and condition require validation through specialist inspection.
A structural survey of boundary walls is advised to identify areas of instability and advise on heritage appropriate repairs.
25
The listed bell tower appears in fair condition with no apparent surface/structural defects. This requires validation by a heritage specialist.
4.6.3 Living Landscape
Mature trees overhang in places creating damp/debris to roads and paths and reducinglighttoadjacentproperties.Rootsmaycontributetotarmac/concretesurface degradation. Engagement with tree specialists is advised to assess condition, risks andremedy.Worksrequirepermissionfromlocaltreeofficerswheretreepreservation orders are in place (HMGovernment, 2014).
There is a large pond to the grounds. Timber boundary fence is present; however, safety signage requires reinstatement. Inspection is advised to confirm extension of fence around perimeter. EstablishedTrees
26
BellTower MortarDeterioration
Surface is covered with green algae, compounded by overhang from surrounding vegetation. Water and ground conditions require survey to identify wildlife and biodiversity risk, with consideration of heritage implications (The Wildlife Trusts, n.d) (Historic England, 2018).
27
PondAreas
5. DELETERIOUS MATERIALS
Presence cannot be eliminated through desktop survey. The following considerations are advised to eliminate risk to occupants and visitors:
Asbestos
Original features carry low risk of asbestos. Extensions and later installations pre 2000 (e.g.precastgarage)havepotential forasbestoscomposition. (PublicHealth England, 2017) (HSE, 2020). Assumed presence is advised and inspection is required to validate (HSE, 2010, pp.12-13).
Lead
Water pipes are potentially lead composition to mains supply junction (WaterSafe, 2017) (Yorkshire Water, 2020). Inspection and sampling are recommended. Replacement of pipes with copper/plastic alternatives may be advised (2020).
Lead paint may be present under internal timber décor (HSE, 2016). Inspection is advised to confirm, document and eliminate risk to contractors/occupants during maintenance/redecoration (SPAB, 2017).
Radon
Warmsworth is at low risk of exposure. Property levels can be confirmed through testing. Where actionable levels exist, solutions can be investigated via radon specialists (UK Radon, n.d.).
28
6. RISK SEEN HAZARDS
Certain reported issues* present risk to property condition and occupants/visitor safety. It is advised these are addressed, or further inspected to understand remedial action/cost, prior to purchase:
*Associated report content indicated in brackets
Property Structure
o Degraded roof timbers (4.3.1, 4.5.4)
Internal Space
o Entrance carpet fraying (4.5.1)
o Moisture to light fitting (4.5.2)
o Rot/damage to attic timbers (4.5.4)
o Unsafe pipe and cable access (attic) (4.5.4)
o Miscellaneous items (stairwell) (4.5.5)
External Space
o Tarmac surface potholes (4.6.1)
o Fractured footpath (4.6.1)
o Degraded stone/mortar to boundary wall (4.6.2)
o Absence of pond safety signage (4.6.3)
29
7. FURTHER RECOMMENDED INVESTIGATIONS
INVESTIGATIONCOMMENTS
REQUIRED
Structural
Verify foundation type and stability of sub, main, roof structures
Heritage Identify works detrimental to heritage status
Advise remedial actions/costs
Damp Measure moisture levels
Investigate rising damp, timber infestation, rot
Electrical Inspection of wiring/fittings condition
Water/Drainage Confirmation of drainage type
Inspection of service pipes
Energy Efficiency Assess thermal performance/ventilation
Fire Safety Assess fire risk from building design, materials, features
Tree/Landscape Tree condition and maintenance assessment
Ecological Pond condition and biodiversity assessment
Asbestos Identify presence and remedial action
Radon Measurement of levels
Specialist Insurance Considerations/costs of listed status and condition
Land Charges Confirmation of property titles and charges
30
8. REFERENCES
• A F Bravery, R W Berry, J K Carey, D. E. C. (2010). Recognising Wood Rot and Insect Damage in Builgings.
• A Thomas, G Williams, N. A. (1992). The Control of Damp in Old Buildings.
• Books, H. S. E. (2010). Asbestos : The survey guide. Quality Assurance, 264, 1–74.
• BRE. (2007). Condensation and dampness. DG 245
• British Standards Institute (BSI). (2013). bS 7913: Guide to the Conservation of Historic Buildings
• Building Research Establishment (BRE). (2002). Optimising Ground Investigation
• Building Research Establishment (BRE). (2014). Why Do Buildings Crack.
• Building Research Etsablishment (BRE). (1988). House Inspection for Dampness : 4.
• Building Research Etsablishment (BRE). (1989). Wet Rots: Recognition and Control.
• Building Research Etsablishment (BRE). (1990). Assessing Traditional Housing for Rehabilitation
• Building Research Etsablishment (BRE). (1995). Assessing External Rendering for Replacement or Repair. In Construction Research and Innovation
• Building Research Etsablishment (BRE). (1997). Wood rot: assessing and treating decay
• Concrete Society. (2016). Concrete Advice
• David Watt. (2013). Surveying Historic Buildings (2nd ed.). Routledge.
• Doncaster Council. (2012a). Warmsworth Hall: Planning Application for Kitchen Extension 1987. https://planning.doncaster.gov.uk/onlineapplications/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=ZZZYY0FXTS413&activeTab=summary
• Doncaster Council. (2012b). Warmsworth Hall: Planning Application for W.C Extension 1985 https://planning.doncaster.gov.uk/onlineapplications/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=ZZZYY3FXTS608&activeTab=summary
• English Heritage. (2012). EH Guide_Mortars Plasters.
• Establishment, B. R. (2016). BRE Diagnosing the Causes of Dampness. 1–4.
• H W Harrison, P M Trotman, J. K. S. (2009). Roofs and Roofing: Performance,
31
Diagnosis, Maintenance, Repair and the Avoidance of Defects. In Construction Research and Innovation (3rd ed., Vol. 1, Issue 2).
• Hinks, J., & Cook, G. (2002). The Technology of Building Defects.
• Historic England. (1998). Stone Slate roofing Technical Advice note. April, 23.
• Historic England. (2018). Water Features in Historic Settings
• Historic England. (2021). Warmsworth Hall Listing Entry. https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1193489?section=official-listing
• HM Government. (2014). Trees with Preservation Orders and Trees in Conservation Areas https://www.gov.uk/guidance/tree-preservation-orders-and-trees-inconservation-areas#making-applications-tpo
• HMGOV. (2013). Protection From Falling,Collision and Impact. NBS Department for Communities and Local Government
• HSE. (2020). Where Can You Find Asbestos? https://www.hse.gov.uk/asbestos/building.htm
• Ingham, J. P. (2014). Diagnosing Defects in Lime Based Construction Materials.pdf. Journal of Architectural Conservation
• Marshall, D., Worthing, D., & Heath, R. (2013). Understanding Housing Defects.
• Public Health England. (2017). Asbestos: General Information. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/asbestos-properties-incident-management-andtoxicology/asbestos-general-information
• SPAB. (2017). Lead Paint https://www.spab.org.uk/advice/lead-paint
• Stirling, C. (2002). Assessing Moisture in Building Materials.
• Susdrain. (2021). Retrofitting SuDS - why change? https://www.susdrain.org/deliveringsuds/retrofitting/why-retrofit/why-change.html
• Transport Research Laboratory. (2016). Best Practice Guide for the Selection of Pothole Repair Options.
• UK Radon. (n.d.). How to Reduce Radon Levels. Retrieved December 28, 2021, from https://www.ukhsa-protectionservices.org.uk/radon/information/reducelevels
• University of the Westof England (UWE). (2009). Evolution of Building Elements. http://fet.uwe.ac.uk/conweb/house_ages/elements/print.htm
• WaterSafe. (2017). Dangers of Lead in Drinking Water. https://www.watersafe.org.uk/news/latest_news/watersafe_film_highlights_dangers_of_lead/
• Yorkshire Water. (2020). Yorkshire Water Drinking Standards. https://www.yorkshirewater.com/your-water/drinking-water-standards/
32
