Thursday, July June2,11,2020 2020
ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-NINE YEARS OF EDITORIAL FREEDOM
inside
Transgender rights at risk in new policy
NEWS
Students go to bars Experiences & opinions of students going to bars that reopened amid COVID-19
Rules from the Trump administration and Supreme Court seemingly at odds
>> SEE PAGE 2
OPINION
Deconstruct America’s youth
JULIANNA MORANO Daily Staff Reporter
Commentary on the histories of Tulsa, Juneteenth and east Oklahoma. >> SEE PAGE 4
Regents approve new budget with tuition increase in special meeting
Dominick Sokotoff/Daily
ARTS
“Braiding Sweetgrass” A book that asks us to reconsider our place in nature. >> SEE PAGE 6
MICHIGAN IN COLOR
The American Dream: Impossible Communities of color perpetually have their inalienable rights restricted from them
>> SEE PAGE 9
SPORTS
Perfect storm
Race in America and how the lacrosse community needs to do better >> SEE PAGE 10
INDEX Vol. CXXIX, No. 120 © 2020 The Michigan Daily
NEWS .................................... 2 OPINION ............................... 4 ARTS/NEWS..........................6 MiC......................................... 8 SPORTS................................ 10
michigandaily.com michigandaily.com
CALDER LEWIS & ARJUN THAKKAR
Summer News Editor and Daily Staff Reporter
The University of Michigan’s Board of Regents passed the administration’s 2020-21 budget in a 5-2 vote during a special meeting Monday night, days after a 4-4 vote at their June 25 meeting had appeared to sink proposed increases in tuition and fees. The approved budget includes a 1.9 percent increase in tuition for the Ann Arbor campus; a 3.9 percent increase for UM-Flint and UM-Dearborn; a 1.9 percent increase in room and board fees and a $50 COVID19 student fee. Regents Paul Brown (D), Jordan Acker (D), Ron Weiser (R), Mark Bernstein (D) and Michael Behm (D) voted in favor of the budget, with Brown and Acker changing their votes from Thursday. Regents Shauna Ryder Diggs (D) and Denise Ilitch (D) voted against the budget. Regent Katherine White (D) was not present, though she called in to vote for the proposed budget at the previous meeting. After the budget initially failed to pass on June 25,
University President Mark Schlissel said he anticipated the budget proposal the executive team would present at the July Regents meeting would diminish or eliminate a tuition increase for the Ann Arbor campus. Schlissel explained that the Board called for the special meeting on Monday because, without a budget, the University would not be able to operate and continue paying employees in the new fiscal year, starting July 1. Half of the revenue from the tuition increase will go toward increasing financial aid to address the pandemic, according to Schlissel, and the new budget also doubled the funds provided to Flint and Dearborn campuses from $10 million to $20 million. Schlissel defended the proposal and cited the University’s ongoing efforts to protect students and families from the pandemic and economic recession including COVID19 testing, hiring freezes, the suspension of nonessential travel and spending, and the use of $400 million from the endowment. “We’re committed to do our very best to make sure that the COVID-19 pandemic does not result in a lost generation of students who are unable to continue or complete their
Michigan education because of the circumstances we find ourselves in,” Schlissel said. Students have criticized the University for trying to increase tuition, claiming their learning experiences will not be the same with online classes and more students are now struggling financially due to the recession sparked by the pandemic. After Schlissel’s introduction, most of the meeting was devoted to Regents explaining their support for or disapproval of the budget. Weiser, who supported the budget last Thursday and on Monday, addressed demands made by students and activists to use the endowment to balance the budget and cover financial losses. He said much of the endowment funds are restricted to particular units of the University and thus cannot be redirected legally. “While we are a university that’s blessed by having an endowment that’s gonna give us 400 million dollars this year, most of that money is restricted to certain areas,” Weiser said. “… It’s not a 12 million (sic) dollar endowment where we can take the income and spread it, put it
Read more at michigandaily.com
On June 12, the Trump administration announced a rollback of Obama-era anti-discrimination policies for trans and nonbinary people in the healthcare system. According to a statement from the Department of Health and Human Services, the federal government will no longer recognize gender identity as protected categories under the civil rights section of the Affordable Care Act, and will curb the interpretation of “sex” to pertain only to “the plain meaning of the word” as “male or female and as determined by biology.” Three days later, the Supreme Court followed with its own ruling on sex discrimination in employment, arguing sex discrimination does encompass discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. These seemingly contrasting federal rulings have raised questions in terms of what that ultimately means for trans and nonbinary people’s rights. LSA junior Hazel Gordon voiced her concerns to The Daily in the wake of the Trump administration’s ruling, stating that trans discrimination in this country is not necessarily new, but explicit government backing for it is. “It is worth noting that it does happen already,” Gordon said. “This just provides, I guess, legal backing for it … I think it opens up a lot of already vulnerable people to further discrimination.” Gordon, who identifies as a trans woman, said the Supreme Court’s decision is a sign of progress, on the other hand, but shouldn’t be met without skepticism, especially in
Read more at michigandaily.com