Safetydrape Blast Curtain Brochure

blast curtains

SAFETYDRAPE® BLASt CURTAINS THE ONLY BLAST CURTAIN TESTED TO MEET AND EXCEED US GOVERNMENT CRITERIA FOR GLASS HAZARD. Safetydrape® is a patented drapery system (USPO #5,915,449) designed to mitigate flying glass shards and debris caused by a bomb blast or explosion.

The product protects from injury and death by venting intense blast loads while safely capturing damaging and deadly flying projectiles. De­signed in response to the statistic that “80 - 85% of injuries sustained during a blast event can be attributed directly to glass shards;· (Glass, 2003)* Safetydrape® is installed and recognised around the world as a 1st choice physical security and facility protection system. Clients include the U.S. Armed Forces, many civilian agencies, the General Services Administration and foreign governments, as well as petrochemical and pharmaceutical companies The Safetydrape® system includes the drape itself, anchor hardware and a trough which is placed at the sill of the window for holding the additional length of drape necessary for capturing glass shards during an explosion. The drape is an­chored at the head of the window (either inside or outside mount) while remaining unanchored at the sill. Blast pres­sure unfurls the drape from the trough to create an envelope for capturing flying debris. Once the blast pressure dissipates, the drape deposits the glass hazard safely on the floor at the base of the window.

Applied Research Associates, using ATBlast Software calcu­lated and confirmed that Safetydrape® was able to remain effective and withstand blast pressures of 4 - 55 psi placed at the face of the window.

Materialised has serviced the furnishing textile and wall covering needs of the hospitality, health, education and leisure industries across Australasia since 1980.

Our in-house print capabilities enable us to deliver on time, on budget and on trend.

If you have a specific design requirement, we can work with you to develop the perfect solutions for your projects. All our designs can be custom engineered by our in-house textile designers and printed using dye sublimation on your choice of commercial grade textile base cloth or wall covering substrate. Alternatively, we can develop woven fabrics to suit a specific project, price point, or technical specification.

used for

BUSINESS APPLICATION

ENTERPRISE SOLUTION

Law enforcement Preparedness Prevention Response Security

Asset Management Planning

Resource Planning Security

used in MIDDLE EAST: Australian Embassy, Israel US Army HQ, Kuwait US Department of State, Iraq Osen-Hunter, Iraq Blackwater, Iraq Arup, Jordan & Israel New Millennium, Iraq Water Ministry, Iraq Edinburgh International, Iraq Australian Consulate, Jordan AMERICA: Lackland AFB - San Antonia, TX 77th Regional Readiness Command - NY 9th Regional Readiness Command - HI Verizon Wireless - New York, NY US Coast Guard - ME Office of Emergency Management - CO Camp Roberts - California National Guard San Miguel, CA Francis E. Warren AFB - WY US Department of State - Washington, DC Fort Eustis - VA Peterson AFB - CO

Marathon Petroleum- Findlay, OH ExxonMobil - Irving, TX United Nations Headquarters - New York, NY SOUTH AMERICA: Joint Forces FOL, Curacao Exxon Mobil, Co lumbia EUROPE: Volkel AB, Netherlands Bueche l AB, Germany Rhein Ma in Base, Germany Aviano AB, Italy Tompkins Barrack, Germany Hohenfels Communit y (US Army), Germany 7th Army Reserve Command, Germany Spangdah lem AB, Germany Ramstein AB, Germany US Army Corp of Engineers, Germany Vicenza, Italy PACIFIC RIM: Convergys, Philippines Dow Jones Newswire, Indonesia AP Network, Indon esia US State Department, Vietnam Paya Le bar AB, Singapore

FILM VS BLASt CURTAIN Excerpts from: Seattle District Corps of Engineers Office Protective Design Center of the US Army Corps of Engineers Request for Quotes (RFQ) W912DW-05-Q-0077 Risk Analysis Evaluation for the purpose of protecting the windows of 5 Army Reserve Centers.

STATEMENT OF WORK: WINDOW BLAST PROTECTION at 70th REGIONAL READINESS COMMAND March 24, 2005 I. Window Blast Protection.

1.1 The Contractor shall provitle “Safety Drape” window blast protection system or equal.

The new system shall meet the following functional and material requirements: a. During the blast-loading event the drape deploys when impacted by the blast pressure and unfurls from the trough to create an envelope that captures the flying debris. Once the blast pressure dissipates; the drape deposits the glass shards and debris on the floor at the base of the window. b. Mitigate flying glass shards and debris caused by a bomb blast by providing optimum venting of the blast load while safely capturing the resulting projectiles. c. Product that allows light transmission. (Alabaster white color is preferred.) d. Flame retardant product that meets all NFPAfire codes for window coverings e. Internal calculations (using DOE Safevue software)providing the psi loads at the glass face at a range from 3 to 19 psi.

End of Excerpt.

Excerpts from: FEMA Manual 426 “Reference Manual to Mitigate Potential Terrorist Attacks Against Buildings” In developing a protection strategy for windows to mitigate the effects of a particular explosion threat scenario, it is important to consider how this protection may interfere with some of these other functions or other explosion threat scenarios. Some questions that may be worthwhile to consider are: - If an internal explosion occurs, will the upgraded windows increase smoke inhalation injuries by prevention the smoke from venting through windows that would normally break in an explosion event?

- If a fire occurs, will it be more difficult to break protected windows in order to vent the building and gain access to the injured?

- Will a window upgrade that is intended to protect the occupants worsen the hazards to passersby?

End of Excerpt.

Excerpts from: Statements before U.S. House Of Representatives Subcommittee on Public Buildings and Economic Development Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Robert A. Peck Commissioner Public Buildings Service General Services Administration June 4, 1998 “In 1996, we asked the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to evaluate the shatter protection performance of polymer film. NIST found no evidence that polymer film measurably reduces the possibility of damage caused by fl ing glass from explosive blasts. Given this analysis, we asked the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to conduct blast tests to determine the performance of polymer film and other glazing configurations. The strength of the glazing units was primarily related to the thickness of the glass. The test results focused our attention on the importance not just of the capacity of the window glazing material itself, but also the supporting structural walls, the anchorage (bite retention), and the window framing in order to maximize total window system strength.

GSA uses the ISC draft security design criteria for new construction and for retrofitting windows in our existing buildings. As the Corps’ blast tests suggest, we determine the most appropriate retrofit solution (e.g., polymer film, laminates, blast curtains, or polycarbonate panels) by examining each individual building, using security risk assessments, engineering recommendations, cost benefit analyses, and, of course, the recommendations of our tenant agencies. To make a cost-effective decision, we consider the life cycle of the building, the life cycle of the alternative glazing solutions, and their life-cycle costs.”

End of Excerpt.

Excerpts from: SC Security Design Criteria for New Federal Office Buildings and Major Modernization Projects: A Review and Commentary Window assemblies can be designed to respond to many anticipated blast loads. For new construction, it may be best to specify laminated glass; for existing glazing, a fragment-retention film might be applied. Although these approaches do little to improve the strength of the glass (failure will occur), they can hold the shards of glass together to better protect occupants from hazardous debris.

This document can be downloaded from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10678.html End of Excerpt.

FILM VS BLASt CURTAIN NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND CENTRE OF EXPERTISE ON PHYSICAL SECURITY SECURITY ENGINEERING WORKSHOP APRIL, 2002

FILM VS BLASt CURTAIN GLASS HAZARD MITIGATION There are 2 general approaches to mitigating glass shards propelled by explosions which produce blast overpressures.

1: Harden the glass, frame, wall and anchorage to resist the anticipated blast load.

2: Allow the window to break but immediately capture the shards while venting and dissipating the blast overpressures.

In case number 1 using film, the weakest point of the glass, frame, wall or anchorage will determine the systems capability. To give an example, Daylight Applications of film (applied directly to the glass) rely on the strength of the glass around the edges.

In most cases, the glass edge is not that strong and will fail when impacted by relatively low blast overpressures starting at 2 psi. This failure will cause the filmed glass to release and enter the room as a large, extremely dangerous projectile.

Daylight Application of film is the cheapest but also the weakest of the glass mitigation systems.

For added strength, film can be anchored to the window frames mechanically or adhered to frames with silicon. Mechanical anchorage transfers the blast load to the frame and therefore protection is correlated with the strength of the frame. Most frames, particularly with currently installed windows, are not designed or anchored for blast loads.

Test data for frame strength must be very carefully evaluated. When testing is performed, it is typically done using steel framed windows in concrete reinforced test structures. Typical buildings are clearly not as strong as the blast structures.

Window protection that works in the test may not perform the same in a standard building. In particular, wood framed windows are not suitable for film application.

In case number 2 using the Safetydrape TM model, capturing glass shards is relatively independent from glass, frame, or anchorage considerations.

Safetydrape TM which is essentially a sheer curtain mounted with conventional hardware, vents and dissipates blasts pressures with very little blast energy transferred to the mounting hardware.

This enables the curtain to capture glass shards effectively without having to reinforce or restructure the existing wall or window opening. Rigid systems i.e. window films, will hold up to certain pressure thresholds, but will fail catastrophically when their retaining capacity is exceeded.

When a film encased window fails, it enters the protected space as a large, intact missile that can be even more dangerous than shard glass. In contrast, Safetydrape TM because of the way it is designed to work, will continue to capture glass shards through a larger range of pressures than window films without itself become a flying lethal projectile.

To further prove this point, in April 2005, Safetydrape TM conducted a series of 7 blast demonstrations at the Quantico Marine Base. Three of these blast demonstrations were for the Force Protection Equipment Demonstration, FPED V. Our blast curtains were installed using #8, 1 ½” hex head screws installed into plywood. The explosive used was C-4 and the blast pressures ranged from 55 psi at 37 psi­msec to 64 psi at 39.69 psi-msec.

The mounting screws and hardware were never changed through all 7 blasts. Safetydrape TM is designed to be installed into any existing building substrate or framing.

SafetydrapeTM can be considered for any building requiring glass hazard mitigation regardless of the window framing methods.

FILM VS BLASt CURTAIN Excerpts from: Security Glazing Options” Presented to Construction Specifications Institute

by Tom Harpole & Dr. H. Scott Norville April 28, 2004 “Dr. Norville spent four days surveying the damage and says he found no surprises in the performance of glazing types that were subjected to overpressures from the blast. He notes: “The only conventional glazing within 700 feet [21O m] of the Murrah building that remained intact after the blast was laminated glass with a PVB interlayer.”

Within a few months of the Murrah building bombing, the General Services Administration (GSA) recommended the installation of Mylar film on exterior windows of federal buildings. Norville says he was surprised that GSA regarded window films as offering blast resistance. “Based on years of comparative blast testing on glazing configurations, including dozens of tests that refuted manufacturers’ claims for window-film performance, I’d have to say that the phrase ‘security film’ is an oxymoron,” he insists.

“When the research community asked for test results that support the window-film prescription, the GSA couldn’t cite any evidence from responsible testing that supported retrofitting film for blast resistance,” he adds. Ed Conrath, a professional engineer with the Arm Corps of Engineers’ Protective Design Center in Omaha, also surveyed the scene at Oklahoma City and arrived at somewhat different conclusions than Norville. “If you are working with budget constraints but want a measure of low-level protection for the short term, applying window film may be better than doing nothing,” Conrath says. “Retrofitting with films can offer limited protection when curtains are used and furniture is placed away from windows.”

About Dr. H. Scott Norville: The career of H. Scott Norville, director of the Texas Tech University Glass Research and Testing Laboratory (GRTL), has closely paralleled the development of ASTM test standards and protocols for security glazing. Norville has blown up more than 300 glazing configurations since 1989, documenting the postblast breakage characteristics of virtually every type of window assembly. He helped develop the ASTM blast test standards and protocols and rigidly adheres to them.”

About Tom Harpole: Tom Harpole is an explosives engineer and a freelance writer near Avon, Montana. Mr. Harpole is a frequent contributor to The Specifier.

End of Excerpt.

FILM VS BLASt CURTAIN EXPERTS WEIGH IN ON THE QUESTION OF WINDOW FILM VS. BLAST CURTAINS Updated: December 28, 2012 Introduction Manufacturers of Safetydrape TM blast curtains believe that it is important to bring to your attention what experts say about blast curtains (Safetydrape TM) and window films, aka mylar, fragmentation retention film (FRF).

PARTIAL CUSTOMER LIST With over 2,000 installations worldwide, here are some we are most proud of for protecting their building occupants from the deadly effects of flying glass during explosions: UNITED STATES: White House Execut ive Offices, - Washington DC Amtrak Stations - PA, NY, DC New York Life - New York, NY TA Instruments - MA Lockheed Martin - VA DISA- VA Colorado Springs Police Dept. - Co lo ra do Springs, CO Qwest NOC - VA McGuire AFB - NJ National Foreign Affairs Training Center- US State Department - VA Walter Reed National Military Medical Center - Bethesda, MD Boeing - Seattle, WA Fort George G. Meade, Fort Mea de , MD Washington Navy Yard, Was hington, DC Cannon AFB - NM DT RA - VA Naval Air Station Barbers Point - Kapolei, HI Hickam AFB - Pearl Harbor, HI US Dept. of Agriculture - Washington DC Navy SCIF - VA Federal Judges Chamber - Bronx, NY Justice Dept. - Washington, DC National Guard - AZ Picatinny Arsenal - Wharton, NJ Grand Forks AFB - ND Ft. Carson - CO Ft. Lesley J. Mc Na ir - Washington DC Ma cDi ll AFB - FL 94th Regional Readiness Command - MA Adas Israel Congregation, Washington, DC Nellis AFB - NV

CAPABILITY BRIEFING PRODUCT NAME: Safetydrape™ - aka - Bomb Blast Curtain PRODUCT SERVICE: Safetydrape™ is a patented blast curtain designed to capture and contain life threatening glass shards when propelled as hazards due to an external explosion or bomb blast.

Safetydrape™ enables users to achieve the standards required under the 2007 SAFETY Act (www.safetyact .gov) and is the only glass hazard mitigation technology granted coverage under the 2007 SAFETY Act by the Department of Homeland Security as a Qualified Anti-Terrorism Technology (QATT).

Safetydrape™ is listed in the Standoff Weapons Force Protection Resource Guide published by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Deputy Directorate for Counter-Terrorism (J34).

Safetydrape™ has been subjected to extensive testing using various levels of explosives and passes GSA’s Level 3 Glass Hazard Mitigation Criteria.

The GSA test criteria requires pressures of 4psi for 28.8psi/msec. Safetydrape™ tests performed at the Force Protection Equipment Demonstration (FPED) Ill, IV & V, Quantico Marine Base, Virginia passed and far exceeded the 4psi for 28.8psi/msec minimum requirement.

April 26 - 28, 2004 at FPED V 2 lbs of C4 were placed at 10 feet generating 55psi for 37.36psi/msec.

Safetydrape™ withstood even these higher pressures and captured the life threatening glass shard hazard from the explosion.

Safetydrape™ as a system offers a light, translucent fabric and trough for holding essential additional drape material and weights.

Safetydrape™ installations are required to remain in place at all times given the unpredictable nature of bomb blasts and explosions.

Safetydrape™ customers report an additional benefit from minimal loss of light and visibility U.S. PATENT #: 5,915,449 UNIT COST: Safetydrape™ charges per linear foot of each window width. Window height is important, however impacts cost very little.

LIMITED WARRANTY: Only available with Factory Certified Installation.

Fabric panels are covered against substant ial defects in material or workmanship by a limited 20-year warranty from the date of purchase.

Trough is covered against substantial defects in material or workmanship by a limited 30-year warranty from the date of installation.

Installation Hardware is covered against substantial defects in material or workmanship by a limited lifetime warranty from the date of installation.

INSTALLATION COST: Safetydrape™ is charged per linear metre of window width, total number of windows per Installat ion (crew size) and Customer Site requirement related to time of day and duration availability- tbd after receiving Window Measurement details and Scope of Work from Customer.

INSTALLATION TIME: Safetydrape™ installations follow a detai led Scope of Work that uses an average of 30 - 45 minutes per window, extra time for larger windows, scaffolding, time of day access to windows, daily travel from housing work site and total available period of time to complete the installation based on Customer Scope of Work.

AVAILABILITY: Safetydrape™ has been installed in over 20 countries and thousands of buildings worldwide .

Wherever there is a need to save more lives for the least cost we are prepared to travel, including all international “hot zones”.

LEAD TIME: Safetydrape™ is made to order for each Customer. Upon singed and approved Cost Proposal, Purchase Order and receipt of Deposit, production lead time to ship is on average 4 - 6 weeks FOB Mercersburg, PA. PHYSICAL SECURITY VALUE: Safetydrape™ saves the most lives for the least cost when there is a need to mitigate life threatening glass hazards impact to people and equipment for existing buildings impacted by bomb blasts. Statistics show that over 85% of injuries caused by an explosion are from glass hazards. Installing Safetydrape™ will dramatically reduce staff injury and death from explosionsand bomb blasts.

QUALIFICATIONS: Designated and Certified as a QATT (Qualified Ant i-terro rism Technology) by the Department of Homeland Security Granted coverage under the 2007 SAFETY Act by the Department of Homeland Security www.safetyact.gov Passes US Government ASTM F1642 test criteria Listed on J34 Joint Staff, Standoff Weapons Resource Guide US Patent# 5,915,449 UFC (release xyz) allows blast curtains to be used in Department of Defense (DoD) owned and leased facilities Safetydrape™ can move to a new office space when a lease ends. Safetydrape™ installations will not void current window warranties. NOTE: All window film and tint Void window Warranties.

Safetydrape™ is GSA Approved as an Energy Conserving Technology and may significantly reduce heating/ cooling costs Safetydrape™ offers superior protect ion compared to daylight -applied film and accommodate a wider range of bomb blast psi pressures.

Safetydrape™ strat egically limits Customer's liability from an act of terrorism based on established coverage under the 2007 SAFETY Act www.safetyact.gov Safetydrape™ is Approved for use by the Historical Preservation Society Safetydrape™ qualifies and is eligible for LEED Points

COMPETITION: Window Film aka Fragmentation Retention Film (FRF) or Mylar NOTE: The use of FRF has been shown to remain a lethal hazard under some bomb blast pressures.

See video REFERENCES/STANDARDS/PERFORMANCE: BLAST TEST: ARA-TR-98-4626.1-2 Test was performed by Applied Research Associates and took place at the Special Weapons Defense Agency, Kirtland AFB, Albuquerque, NM. OUTCOME: Safetydrape™ met all GSA Condition 3 requirements; establishing Safetydrape™ as suitable and viable technology solution for meeting all GSA glazing protection requirements for Level C buildings across the Federal inventory.

APPLICABLE STANDARDS: 1. ASTM 5034-95 2. ASTM D 2256-97 3. ASTM D 6797-02 4. ASTM F1642-96 5. Flame Rating NFPA 701 6. Flame Rating State of California (Title 19 and Bulletin 117) 7. AATCC 96 IV A 8. AATCC 16 Class 5 REFERENCES: US Army Corp of Engineers, BMAG (Blast Mitigation Action Group) 2007 SAFETY Act Designation www.safetyact.gov Safetydrape™ has been grant ed coverage by the Department of Homeland Security under the 2007 SAFETY Act and also qualifies as a QATT (Qualified Ant i-Terr orism Technology) Unified Facilities Criteria, UFC 4-010 -01 Safetydrape™ aka Blast Curtain is identified as a solution for all existing owned and leased DoD facilities.

TM5-853 Vol. 1 & Vol. 2 Security Engineering Manual (US Army and US Air Force) Safetydrape™ aka Blast Curtains receive several references as a protective measure. Search "blast curtain" to quickly find thesereferences.

Safetydrape™ documents are FOUO and can be downloaded for those with a Usern name/ Password from the USACE website PBS Pl00 Chapter 8 Security Design - aka - Facilities Standards for the Public Building Service Safetydrape™ aka Blast Curtains are listed as a “preferred system” USAF Installation Force Protection Guide Safetydrape™ aka Blast Curtains listed as a protective measure in Common Table of Allowances (US Army) CTA 50-909 Whole Building Design Guide See section A for info rmati on on Curtain and Shield Systems. Section C. Blast Curtain RKB M IPT- Responder Knowledge Base and National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism

A knowledge base created to inform and provide Emergency Responders, purchasers, and planners with a trusted, integrated, on-line source of information on products, standards, certifications, grants, and other equipment-related information.

FEMA - Federal Emergency Management Agency Blast Curtains listed as a protection system.

FEMA 426 - Reference Manual to Mitigate Potential Terrorist Attacks Against Buildings FEMA 427 - Primer for Design of Commercial Buildings to Mitigate Terrorist Attacks FEMA 428 - Primer to Design Safe School Projects in Case of Terrorist Attacks Written by Joseph Smith, a nationally known security and blast consultant with 22 years of experience in security engineering and explosion effects. Most recently, he has assisted in the development of the US lnteragency Security Committee Security Criteria. He holds a BSCE from the USAF Academy and an MSCE from Columbia University.

Safetydrape™ testing took place at the Defense Special Weapons Agency test sit e, Kirtland AFB. CUSTOMERS: US Army, US Air Force, US Marines, US Navy, US Department of State, US Department of Agriculture, US Department of Justice, US National Guard, US Armed Forces Reserv e, Defense Threat Redu ction Agency, Domestic and Foreign Emb assies, Courts, Synagogues, Large Corporations, State Offices of Emergency Management, Mass Transit Operators.

MISSION APPLICATIONS: Catastrophic Threats Counterterrorism Critical Infrastructure Protection Incident Management

FILM VS BLASt CURTAIN CONCLUSION & SUMMARY Saving money is important, but you always get what you pay for. If Physical Security and mitigating glass hazards at your building is the mission, then film, based on all the experts (not the Fortune 100 firm Lobbyist), does not qualify as a responsible solution. Safetydrape TM blast curtains do not have the potential problems listed in FEMA Reference Manual 426 because the protected windows are not being hardened. They also will not interfere with or violate building fire codes or impede the use of windows for emergency egress or entrance. Safetydrape TM saves the most lives for the least cost - period!

Since 9/11, protection of people and facilities in the United States has become a matter of major concern to leaders and managers in both the public and private sectors. One of the undisputed facts associated with this new environment is that explosives are by far the most frequent tool used by terrorists and in explosive events, the vast majority of all casualties is caused by shard glass, principally from windows.

As time passes, knowledge is gained, techniques and procedures are improved, and technology is enhanced and created to meet this new set of threats and risks. Safetydrape TM blast curtains represent one of the most significant well established and patented technologies available to protect people from glass hazards. Safetydrape TM techniques and methods are, however, a major departure from traditional methods of blast protection.

For that reason, Mitigation Technologies prepared and shares this information to clarify the significant improvements that SafetydrapeT M provides to save lives when compared to older methods of glass hazard protection. We trust this review will assist in completing a the due diligence process and efforts by Anti-Terrorism Officers, Facility Security Officers and other decision makers charged with the protection of their staff others at risk during a bomb blast. Mititech, LLC is proud to also assure our customers and Security Professionals that the capabilities of Safetydrape TM has been granted coverage under the 2007 Federal law known as the “Support Anti-Terrorism By Fostering Effective Technology Act” (the “SAFETY Act”) as a compliant blast mitigation systems, including all associated services.

Please contact us to begin discussions about a site specific Threat Assessment by our team of professionals so that we can offer you the best solution available for addressing glass hazards in your building. You will be joining hundreds of buildings around the world who have chosen Safetydrape™.

While film may seem attractive, often because it is cheaper, this choice leads to glass hazard mitigation mission failure based on the experts who have tested film for saving lives and preventing injury to people. When your mission is to upgrade Physical Security and actually save lives and prevent injuries, Safetydrape TM is a proven solution for saving the most lives for the least cost.

SAFETYDRAPE® BLASt CURTAINS MEET OR EXCEED THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ASTM F1642 STANDARD TEST METHOD FOR GLAZING AND GLAZING SYSTEMS SUBJECT TO AIRBLAST LOADINGS GLAZING HAZARD LEVEL: LH GSA STANDARD TEST METHOD FOR GLAZING AND WINDOW SYSTEMS SUBJECT TO DYNAMIC OVERPRESSURE LOADINGS RATING: 3 AAMA 510-06 VOLUNTARY GUIDE SPECIFICATION FOR BLAST HAZARD MITIGATION FOR FENESTRATION SYSTEMS ASTM E1300-04, STANDARD PRACTICE FOR DETERMINING LOAD RESISTANCE OF GLASS IN BUILDINGS ISO 16933:2007 GLASS IN BUILDING - EXPLOSION RESISTANT SECURITY GLAZING - TEST AND CLASSIFICATION FOR ARENA AIR BLAST LOADING ISO 16934:2007 GLASS IN BUILDING - EXPLOSION RESISTANT SECURITY GLAZING - TEST AND CLASSIFICATION BY SHOCK TUBE LOADING UFC 4-010-01 DOD MINIMUM ANTITERRORISM STANDARDS FOR BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) SAFETY ACT 2002 BOTH DESIGNATION AND CERTIFICATION.

FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE contact: Gary Price - Materialised 0418 239 646 gary.price@materialised.com materialised.com

safetydrape: ensuring your safety, comfort and peace of mind In order for Safetydrape™ to deploy effectively, the blast curtain must be twice the length of the glass.

The excess fabric is housed in a trough mounted at the base of window (pictured below).

See samples for standard trough colours available. Colour swatches are available upon request and actual colour may differ slightly from printed sample.

Standard troughs are manufactured using TUFFCLAD™ - Kynar 500® / Hylar 5000® Coated Galvanised Steel. Troughs can be custom coloured to match existing decor.

Contact your authorised dealer for additional for additional information and pricing.

building inspection area LEGEND A.P. MURRAH FEDERAL BUILDING COLLAPSED STRUCTURE STRUCTURAL DAMAGE BROKEN GLASS/DOORS

Sydney Head Office: 19 Heath Rd, Blakehurst, NSW Australia 2221 Design Studio: Ground Floor, Unit 1, 53 Bourke Rd, Alexandria, NSW Australia 2015 P +61 2 8558 3500 F +61 2 9546 5402 sales@materialised.com Adelaide / Darwin 55A George Street, Parkside, SA Australia 5063 P +61 8 8271 9185 F +61 8 8271 9321 sasales@materialised.com Brisbane 26 Balaclava St, Woolloongabba QLD Australia 4102 P +61 7 3393 2188 F +61 7 3393 2177 qldsales@materialised.com Melbourne / Hobart Suite 2/1 Bromham Pl, Richmond VIC Australia 3121 P +61 3 9815 3033 F +61 3 9815 3077 vicsales@materialised.com Perth 189 Colin Pl, West Perth, WA Australia 6005 P +61 8 9381 2802 F +61 8 9388 1532 wasales@materialised.com New Zealand 10 Dock St, Freemans Bay, Auckland New Zealand 1010 P +64 9 302 7733 F +64 9 302 7779 nzsales@materialised.com Malaysia / Singapore P +61 2 8558 3500 sales@materialised.com

+61 2 8558 3500 | materialised.com Still can’t find what you’re looking for? Access over 30,000 designs through Materialised WeaveUp - where you control colour, pattern, and repeat to create your own bespoke designs. Contact us for registration and log in details and let our specialised team help you find the furnishing solution for your project.

Visit our website to view our entire range, get technical information, or order samples.

Edition 3.