Nov. 13, 1973 issue 03 Loquitur

Page 1

• Vol. XX, No. 3

CABRINI COLLEGE, RADNOR, PA.

November 13, 1973

A New Role For Students byMaryLynn Carone A mixture of worried-looking administrators, frustrated-looking students, and curious-looking faculty, several hundred in all, filled Cabrini's gym on October 24th. The students, faculty and administration gathered together to discuss a major problem that has been causing much controversy in the past weeks . Within an hour and fifteen minutes, all three expressions had vanished from the three factions, and a spark of hope seemed to light the eyes of many. The problem? The seeming inability of SGA to operate effectively and to determine exactly how its power should be defined. As one student commented, SGA seems to be an "appeasement board" or a "punishment body," good only for taking polls or dishing out punishments to unruly members of the campus community. What the students were requesting, or at least attempting to examine, was the possibility of SGA enjoying a greater role in determining whatever pertains to "student life ." Previously, SGA seemed merely to be a body for gathering student opinion or feedback on matters in question, but when it came time to vote on anything, SGA suddenly contracted a case of legislative laryngitis - no voice. Students at the meeting appeared to be united on this one main issue, although other complaints were also raised . These other comments, however, were actually offshoots of the major problem of SGA not having a

determining role in matters of board or a clock for the dayhop lounge have gotten lost,- until student life. Some complaints recently, in all of the red tape . were 1) that the gym is almost What is the solution? constantly rented out to outsiders An encouraging amount of without student consent, leaving Cabrini's own students without a healthy discussion prevailed at the general meeting, and it became court for a basketball game 2) that commuting students have to pay evident that the students actually for a parking space, but will un- have a lot of support from faculty and most of the administration. doubtedly be forced to park The answer lies then in the elsewhere when the Kirk F. White pooling of ideas from these three ¡ car auction comes in April, 3) that a rule forcing resident students to segments of the Cabrini Compay for overnight guests in their munity and a united restructuring of the way in which student life is own rooms was imposed without governed . student consultation. A great deal of time was spent The major outcry of Cabrini students then is to be given the op- at the meeting discussing the Board of Trustees. The role that it portunity not only to voice their opinions, but also to be part of plays in governing Cabrini was some body that would make policy questioned and also its right to do decisions. The general feeling so. Students could not understand seems to be that one person such why matters of student life, in which the board does not paras the Vice-President for Student ticipate, and from which the Affairs or even one particular board is far removed , have to be group should not be solely responreferred to the board. On the other sible for making decisions, but hand academic affairs, which one that some other means of chanwould think the board would be neling student concerns could and more involved in, do not. This is should be devised to eliminate the apparent bottleneck that now one paradox that needs to be looked into. exists. This should also eliminate Sister Mary Louise explained the possibility of "buck-passing" that the Board of Trustees is a on the part of the administration. "self-perpetuating body," that Any questions or proposals on Cabrini is a corporation, and that student life now have to be shuttled back and forth from SGA to the Board of Trustees is "the the students, and Ix.ck to SGA, governing board of the corporation." In response to student then to Sister Mona, often to complaints of the gap existing betSister Bernadette , and then to ween board and students, Sister Sister Mary Louise. Sometimes they even go to the Board of Mary Louise described at length the changes that are being made Trustees. Even simple items such on the board. She stated that efas the acquisition of a bulletin

Special Ed. Changes To Pass/Fail

Competency-Based

Program

by Connie Cesare Special Ed. changes to pass/fail The fact that the Special Education Department's program has developed into a pass/fail system is no secret to anyone on the campus. In a recent interview, Ms. Kerr, Coordinator of the Special Education Department, contributed the following insight into the recent change in the department. The program will be competency-based, said Ms. Kerr . But what does competency-based mean? The program begins by looking at the final product, namely the future Special Education teacher and what this teacher should be qualified to do. Consequently, certain goals and standards must be set up. Once these objectives are determined, specific courses dealing with the goals are developed and eventually fulfilled by t he student. An

example of a competency is the following: Behavioral Competencies To identify and interpret the educational implications associated with a variety of physical handicapping conditions. Experiences Lecture; assigned readings, Finnie, N. Handling the Young Cerebral Palsy Child at Home; Fiorentino, M.R., Reflex Testing, Methods for Evaluating Central Nervous System Development; structured classroom and therapy observations.

Evaluation Compilation of "Educational Implications and Adaptations Chart." First the competency is stated. The expe:::iences then instruct the student in the coII)petency. Finally, the student rs evaluated by his performance in the objective listed in the Evaluation column. Ms. Kerr says that this -

will allow the student to work at his own pace. The time element in learning a competency is not as important as the final mastery of it . When asked how this change came to be, Ms. Kerr replied that ¡the suggestion to change all Special Education courses to pass/fail has been "strongly recommended" by the Harrisburg evaluation team. Ms. Kerr then presented the recommendation to the Academic Council of Cabrini College. She said that she was prepared t.<' compromise but was pleased to find that there was no opposition to her proposal by the faculty members . Controversy has arisen out of the announcement of the pass/fail system. One question is how will the system affect the cumulative averages of the Special Education students themselves and in relation to the rest of the school. (Continued on page 3)

forts are being made to get younger members of the board, and that now for the first time there is an alumnae of the college on the board . Attempts are also being put forth to get more board members from the surrounding area. In reply to some student complaints that 51% of the board is comprised of Missionary Sisters of the Sacred Heart, the President told students that the sisters have invested several million dollars in Cabrini College and that each year they pick up Cabrini's deficit . The Board of Trustees, as Sister Mary Louise stated, is very open to suggestions . She felt that having students present their feelings and suggestions to them would be an excellent idea. At her suggestion, on October 29th the executive board of SGA met briefly with the Board of Trustees to aplain their position . They returned from the meeting very optimistic, stating that the board was extremely cooperative and understanding. SGA was asked to draw up by November 5th a proposal for possible restructure of itself or of the Council of College Affairs (CCA) and to submit it to CCA for

feedback. The proposal will then be studied by various members of the administration for further refinement, and SGA executives will then meet with four or five members of the Board of Trustees to finalize the proposal. At the end of January, all of the new executive board members and possibly some of the old members will present the proposal at the next meeting of the Board of Trustees . What will the proposal be? As this paper goes to press, the most obvious proposal will be not the restructur ing of SGA itself, but rather the use of the Council of College Affairs as a judiciary board on matters brought up by SGA . After a proposal is voted on in student government , the results would be forwarded to CCA, who would then discuss the proposal and vote on it. This eliminates fur. thei red tape. Council is made up of four administrators, four faculty members, and eight students, and all are elected by the groups that they represent. Since CCA, "an advisory committee to (Continued on page 4)

A New Tenure Policy Quality vs. Quantity by Beth Schweitzer Cabrini College is presently in the process of evaluating its tenure policy for faculty, and you, as a student, will be an influential factor . The term " tenure" refers to the permanent contract a teacher obtains in order to remain in a position without being dismissed for prejudicial reasons. The purpose of tenure is to insure academic freedom . It allows the teacher the responsibility of investigating and teaching all aspects of a subject. In thepast, a faculty member at Cabrini received tenure after seven years of full time teaching with the emphasis placed on the time spent in the position. A tenure committee has been appointed by the AAUP consisting of Dr. Bezdek, Dr . Feighan, Ms. Gavigan and Mr. Zurek. They have proposed to get stronger and more definite criteria for awarding of tenure and a clearer procedure. This has been unanimously approved by the faculty and on October 29th was submitted to the Board of Trustees. It was proposed that a committee of five people be elected by the faculty to be concerned with academic freedom, rank of faculty, which is presently in-

structor (lowest rank and salary), assistant professor, associate professor and professor , and to be also concerned with tenure. In turn, this committee of five will a_l-)point subcommittees to evaluate each tenure candidate individually . Three people will make up a subcommittee and there will be a different subcommittee for each individual candidate. Evaluation will be done every semester. Guidelines have been set up for the tenure subcommittees . Teaching ability , contributions to the college community and promise of continued growth and excellence must be considered in evaluating a candidate for tenure. Certain procedures have been recommended to carry out this evaluation. One of the procedures will be student evaluations of the candidate's teaching . In order to present a balanced picture, these evaluations will have to cover the work of several semesters. There will also be teaching ability evaluations by those alumnae who are most familiar with the teacher's ability. Candidates will also be reviewed concerning committee activity, work on academic and non-academic college programs, and work on student activities.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.