Conservatory, Design Principles Document by LOCUS METIS

Prepared on behalf of

City of London and TFL CONSERVATORY Design Principals Document

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

Contents

1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3

INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VISION STATEMENT BRIEF

01 02 03 04

2.0 EXISTING CONTEXT 2.1 SITE LOCATION AND INTRODUCTION 2.2 METABOLISM THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 2.3 METABOLIC FLOW ANALYSIS 2.4 BIOTA FLOW ANALYSIS 2.5 WASTE FLOW ANALYSIS 2.6 TRANSPORT FLOW ANALYSIS 2.7 ENERGY FLOW ANALYSIS 2.8 DECENTRALIZED ENERGY CAPACITY STUDY 2.9 SITE OVERVIEW 2.10 BUILT CONTEXT 2.11 PLANNING CONTEXT 2.12 DECENTRALIZED ENERGY CAPACITY REFERENCES 2.13 ENCLOSED SPACE REFERENCES

05 06 07 08 09-10 11-12 13-14 15-16 17 18 19 20 21 22

3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4

23 24 25 26 27-28

EXISTING SITE HISTORICAL CONTEXT HISTORY OF BARBICAN STATION IMPLICATIONS EXISTING STRUCTURE AND GEOLOGY

4.0 DESIGN PROPOSAL 4.1 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 4.2 PROPOSED DEMOLITION 4.3 DEMOLITION RE-USE 4.4 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 4.5 DESIGN OBJECTIVES 4.6 DESIGN VISION 4.7 MASSING 4.8 SPATIAL CONCEPT 4.9 CIRCULATION 4.10 INTERNAL VIEWS 4.11 TOTAL AREAS 4.12 PROPOSED AREAS 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5

STRUCTURAL REPORT ARCHITECTURAL INTENT PRIMARY STRUCTURE STRUCTURAL PRINCIPALS SECONDARY STRUCTURE STRUCTURAL PRINCIPALS

29 30 31 32 33 34 35-36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48

6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8

BUILDING SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGY AND SUSTAINABILITY REPORT DECENTRALIZED ENERGY POLICY TIMELINE, STAKEHOLDER DEPLOYMENT AND ROLES BUILDING SYSTEM OVERVIEW HOUSING SYSTEM OVERVIEW ENERGY SYSTEM OVERVIEW WATER SYSTEM OVERVIEW BIOTA SYSTEM OVERVIEW

7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN INTRODUCTION IMPORTANT ISSUES SUSPENSION OF EXISTING PUBLIC UTILITIES SITE ESTABLISHMENT AND WELFARE CRANE LOGISTICS

8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3

DESIGNER RISK REPORT CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN SITE ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES RISK REPORT

49 50 51-52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66-67 68 69-72

9.0 LIFECYCLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 9.1 INTRODUCTION 9.2 OVERVIEW

73 74 75-78

10.0 BUILDING CONTROL REPORT 10.1 BUILDING REGULATIONS INTRODUCTION 10.2 BUILDING CONTROL REGULATIONS COMPLIANCE

79 80 81-82

11.0 APPROPRIATE DESIGN GUIDELINE REPORT 11.1 GUIDELINES

83 84

12.0 VALUE ENGINEERING COST REPORT 12.1 INDICATIVE COST OUTLINE 12.2 INDICATIVE COST REPORT PART 1 12.2 INDICATIVE COST REPORT PART 2

85 86 87 98

13.0 PROCUREMENT REPORT 13.1 PROCUREMENT METHOD

89 90

14.0 PROGRAMME

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

91-92

1.0 Introduction

Executive summary

I propose a mixed use market and residential complex above the new Farringdon Crossrail East ticket hall and Barbican station, capturing and utilizing the vast amounts of valuable heat resources endemic to the site. The development is envisioned as a hybridization of open plan market infrastructure and a self-sustaining, off-grid neighborhood of bio-climatically enclosed housing, fostering a truly economical and sustainable building typology that is otherwise impossible within the climatic conditions of London. The character and overall scale of the design will is developed to convey a sense of spaciousness, openness and comfort. The generous proportions celebrate Farringdon role as a key modern transportation â&#x20AC;&#x153;hubâ&#x20AC;? for London, providing the users with an enhanced nature orientated experience. By installing a greenhouse-industrialized system that opens and closes its mechanisms automatically, the solar gain and ventilation are regulated. This way, it is possible to raise the interior temperature naturally and guarantee a base of comfort in the circulation spaces as well as in the in-between spaces. The design of which is the combination of a series of complex systems of relationships both in a programmatic and functional way and in an experiential, emotive and social way all based around a new form of heat and energy utilization. Instead of incoherent optimizations here or there on waste reduction, it is a better idea to develop a new, integrated architecture in which economy, ecology and spatial diversification are coupled to city, nature and landscape. The main structural principles can be divided into three separate elements, a large solid concrete ground and first floor connected by elegant concrete columns at seemingly random spacings, a Forrest of timber households that utilize standardized timber elements as structural walls and floors whilst acting as screening devices, and a transparent lightweight steel and glass envelope that acts as a climate control device.

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

1.0 Introduction 1.2 Vision Statement

Architecture

Landscape

Interweaving

1.0 Introduction 1.3 Brief

Brief - Metabolism of London

To make the urban metabolism of London visible, I dealt with a number of vital flows, goods, people, waste, biota (inter alia plants and animals), energy, food, and fresh water. Each of these flows is indispensable to the cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s functioning and wellbeing. Until now, we have not been able to create prosperity without adversely affecting our living environment. A transition to a sustainable urban community is therefore essential! Metabolic thinking requires switching between different scales, between strategy and spatial design, intermediate flow and associated infrastructure. Instead of incoherent optimizations here or there on waste reduction, it is a better idea to develop a new, integrated perspective in which economy, ecology and spatial diversification are coupled to city, nature and landscape. For the most part, the design for a more energy efficient future is already in place. Because of their dense populations, tall buildings, and infrastructure (all things which have traditionally been causes of greenhouse emissions), cities are already built to develop channels for waste heat and more efficient energy distribution. In the end, it is the urban areas that will be the most energy efficient. New styles of cities and urban development that will incorporate the capture and distribution of waste heat in its founding are on the horizon and will be forever intertwined with city planning and urban morphology.

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

2.0 Existing Context

2.0 Existing Context 2.1 Site Location & Introduction

Introduction

I propose a mixed use market and residential complex above the new Farringdon Crossrail East ticket hall and Barbican station, capturing and utilizing the vast amounts of valuable heat resources endemic to the site. The captured heat together with the E-on Energy CHP will form the couplings between the Islington district regional heat networks, thereby reducing the required local production capacity. The development is envisioned as an enclosed climatically controlled biome that will foster a truly economical and sustainable building typology that is otherwise impossible within the climatic conditions of London. The proposition allows the residents to be completely immersed in a nature orientated environment offering refuge from the intense city life. The development will be funded been funded by TFL who own the site, Islington Council who own and run the network, along with backing from the Mayor, UK Power Networks and CELSIUS (a partnership of five EU cities and aims to demonstrate how the efficiency and performance of district heating systems can be improved by focusing on the opportunity that they offer for capturing and utilizing sources of waste heat that are generated within cities, CELSIUS were instrumental in the development of the Bunhill energy centers that the proposition connects to)

Preserve Victorian buildings

Extent of demolition

Utilize abandoned train tracks for heat storage

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

2.0 Existing Context 2.2 Metabolism Theoretical Framework

Metabolism Theoretical Framework Patrick Geddes

Abel Wolman

Ecological critique of urbanisation

Howard Odum

Metabolism of cities

Energy method

Patrick Geddes

Indusatrial ecology

ENERGY BALANCE

80 6

FIELD

SCIENCE

Economical

Industry

PRACTICE OR THEORY

ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT

CRADLE 2 CRADLE

70 Industrial Ecology

LEAN METHODOLOGY

60 ENERGY METHOD

Ecology

Systems Ecology

Biology

Metabolism

MATERIAL FLOW ANALYSIS

SUBSTANCE FLOW ANALYSIS

METABOLISM

Social Cultural

Architecture URBAN METABOLISM CITY AS ECOSYSTEM METABOLIC RIFT

population

1890

1900

1910

1920

1930

1940

club of rome

second world war

FOSTER

oil consumption

1880

Own Image: Metabolism Theoretical Framework

METABOLIC RIFT

MARX

social revolution

Billions of people

Millions of barels per day

30 2

Anthropology/ Phoilosophy

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

I use the concept of urban metabolism to describe the urban system in organic (not artificial) terms, by drawing a parallel with the human body. Metabolism is therefore a key concept here: the metabolism of the urban landscape. How do the ingenious, interlocking flows and systems in this complex, interactive urban system work, which incessantly works to meet the needs of its residents? To make this urban metabolism visible, a number of vital flows will be dealt with. This usually concerns physical flows, i.e. substance flows. I will concentrate on goods, people, waste, biota (inter alia plants and animals), energy, food, and fresh water. Although people and energy cannot exactly be regarded as substance flows, in a way, it also concerns matter that flows from one location to another. I will also examine building materials, freight traffic and waste. Each of these flows is indispensable to the cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s functioning and well-being. However, these flows will not remain the same in the decades ahead in view of changing requirements and contexts. It will often be extremely difficult to allow them to take place whilst ensuring good quality and greater sustainability. Until now, we have not been able to create prosperity without adversely affecting our living environment. The effects can be felt around the world. An increasing number of city-dwellers are faced with problems connected with this. A transition to a sustainable urban community is therefore essential! A world, where it is possible to create prosperity with a positive effect on our living environment and communities. Decisions and choices at local and regional level can contribute to this to a great extent. But what does this mean specifically for the city? In what form can I best apply the characteristics and possibilities of substance flows to urban life by means of spatial design?

2.0 Existing Context 2.3 Metabolic Flow Analysis

London Flow Analysis Compost plant

Dry bulk

Sales Semi-finished products

Food processing

Metabolic thinking requires switching between different scales, between strategy and spatial design, intermediate flow and associated infrastructure. Instead of incoherent optimizations here or there on waste reduction, it is a better idea to develop a new, integrated perspective in which economy, ecology and spatial diversification are coupled to city, nature and landscape. By drawing the flows together in one chart one gains insight into potential sites where chains can be closed. Such as waste heat from industry that can serve as input for geothermal sources, so that even after thirty years they can still be functional. Also exchange between flows have huge potential: Existing examples like CO2 from the energy chain and nutrients from the water that are used as a raw material in the food chain.

Phosphates Nitrates

Consumers

Urban agriculture Marine food production

Dry bulk

Dry bulk terminals

Wet bulk

Pipelines

Package glass

Biomass

FOOD

Clothes/shoes Small chemicals

Meat

Food exchange

Usable furniture

Fish

Neighbourhood market Farm shops Open markets

Equipment

Seaweed

International food export

Nutrients

Food import-export

Wood

Imported waste

â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;wetâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; waste

Street (pick up point)

biogas

Incineration

Containers Garborator Proteins

Distributers

Collection

Plastics Metals Residual/household

Export Producer C02 Hub

Tank terminals

Road

CCS dismantiling, sorting, recycling

Roll on Roll off

Empty depot

Recovery and refinery Consumers

Ecological footprint of Londoners

Fermentation location

Organic

Dairy

Proteins Proteins

Restaurants

Fruits Cattle farm

Waste management

Household/Company waste Paper/cardboard

Vegetables

Green House

Eco-farm

Waste

Crops

CO2

Fodder

Import

Purchase departments

Gareden/park organic

Residual household

Arable land

Nitrates

Food bank

Heat

Primary production

Phosphates

Waste

Container terminals

CARGO

Manufacturer

Greenhouse gas Rain water

Crude oil Biomass

ENERGY

Fuel industry

Heat

Evaporation

Infiltration

Fuels Coal

Sea Water

Power plant

Electricity

Electricity network

Heat

WATER

Aquifer

Sewage systems Water waste treatment plant

Acidification Eutrophication

Electricity

Heat plant

Drinking water Consumers

cooling water

Natural gas

City district heating

River water

Nutrient rich water

Waste

a p ita

Nutrient extraction

Transport 6% Energy 10% Waste 44% Food 41%

Fresh food distribution

biogas biomass green wood other

Compost location

Food wholesale Supermarkets

Finished products

WASTE

Fodder

g h a or 6.6 3

Ecological footprint of Londoners showing actual size Compared to UK. BFF 2002 _City Limits A resource flow and ecological footprint analysis of Greater London

Solar energy

IMPORT

Wind energy

Geothermic sources

heat energy buffers

nutrients

PRODUCTION Start/End Activity, situation or phase Spatial activity

Route New route

CONSUMPTION

Food Cargo Waste

WASTE

EXPORT

Water Energy

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

2.0 Existing Context 2.4 Biota Flow Analysis

Green space Tree Allotments Cemetery Common Farm Garden Golf course Grass Heath Meadow Nature reserve Orchard Park Pitch Scrub Village green Wetland Wood Zoo Forest Woodlands Park and Garden

Water Reservoirs Aquifer Water wells Historic Flood Levels Flood Warning Levels Surface Water Water Lines Waterways Lines River Pier

Green Spaces_http://www.gigl.org.uk/open-spaces/Water_http://www.mapcruzin.com/free-england-arcgis-maps-shapefiles.htm Nature_ https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/access-public-open-space-and-nature-ward Trees_ https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/local-authority-maintained-trees https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/business-and-government/products/os-open-rivers.html DEM Map_https://data.gov.uk/dataset/lidar-composite-dsm-25cm1 Flood Warning Areas_https://data.gov.uk/dataset/flood-risk-areas Historic Flood Areas_https://data.gov.uk/dataset/historic-flood-map1 Reservoirs_ https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/london-reservoir-levels Acquifer_ http://www.bgs.ac.uk/products/hydrogeology/aquiferDesignation.html http://www.mapcruzin.com/free-england-arcgis-maps-shapefiles.html

2.0 Existing Context 2.4 Biota Flow Analysis

Biota

In nature every output by an individual organism is also an input that renews the whole living environment of which it is a part. To become sustainable, cities have to develop a circular metabolism, using and re-using resources as efficiently as possible and minimizing materials use and waste discharges into the natural environment. The bulk of London’s water originates from the rivers Thames and Lea and from reservoirs around the city. London is notorious for its leaking water pipes and in recent years Thames Water seems to have been able to do little to improve water leakage rates. Meanwhile London’s own water table has been rising because a legacy of contamination has made it too costly for it to be used to supply drinking water. Water shortages in dry years such as 2006 are starting to concentrate the mind of decision makers, and additional future demands from a growing population in and around London is likely to encourage more efficient water use. New ways of processing and using water from London’s water table may have to be found in the coming years. Best practice in efficient water use is likely to inform decisions on the uses of new water technology in London and this is likely to include run-off collection, as well as grey water flushing, efficient toilet cisterns, efficient shower heads and other techniques in use around the world. Water metering is also likely to become the norm. Urban Metabolism: London Sustainability Scenarios, H. Girardet, Environmental Consultant, UK (2006)

Potential heat from River Source

GLA_London’s Zero Carbon Energy Resource: Secondary Heat, Report Phase 1 (2013)

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

2.0 Existing Context 2.5 Waste Flow Analysis

Waste Flow Supermarket Restaurant Bars Recycling Centre Landfill Site Waste Treatment Sewer Main Stormwater Main Intercepting Sewer Thames Tunnel https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/statistical-gis-boundary-files-london Waste Collection_https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/local-authority-collected-waste-management-london https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/household-waste-recycling-rates-borough Restaurant and Supermarkets_ http://download.geofabrik.de/europe/great-britain/england/greater-london.html Sewer lines_http://mappinglondon.co.uk/2014/londons-other-underground-network/ Recycling Centre_https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk Waste Treatment_ http://download.geofabrik.de/europe/great-britain/england/greater-london.html https://data.gov.uk/dataset/permitted-waste-sites-authorised-landfill-site-boundaries1 http://www.mapcruzin.com/free-england-arcgis-maps-shapefiles.htm

https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/statistical-gis-boundary-files-london Waste Collection_https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/local-authority-collected-waste-management-london https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/household-waste-recycling-rates-borough Restaurant and Supermarkets_http://download.geofabrik.de/europe/great-britain/england/greater-london.html Sewer lines_http://mappinglondon.co.uk/2014/londons-other-underground-network/ Recycling Centre_https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk Waste Treatment_http://download.geofabrik.de/europe/great-britain/england/greater-london.html https://data.gov.uk/dataset/permitted-waste-sites-authorised-landfill-site-boundaries1 http://www.mapcruzin.com/free-england-arcgis-maps-shapefiles.htm

2.0 Existing Context 2.5 Waste Flow Analysis

Waste

The urban metabolism consists of the entire input of resources used by city people, and their subsequent output of wastes. Modern cities tend to have a linear rather than a circular metabolism. Many materials are used only once and then end up in a landfill. For cities to exist in the long term, they need to function in a similar manner. High resource productivity is the key to the necessary changes. Londonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s sewage is currently transported to large treatment works such as Beckton and Crossness in 19th century sewers. Some decades ago, a proportion of it was used as fertilizer and soil conditioner, but the bulk of it was being dumped in the Thames Estuary. Now most of Londonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s sewage is dehydrated and then burned in an incinerator, with the permanent loss of carbon as well as plant nutrients such as potash, phosphates and nitrates that ought be returned to farmland. It is likely that new, smaller scale ecofriendly sewerage technologies, such as Eco-Machines, will increasingly come into use, with the plant nutrients contained in sewage being used in urban-fringe farming and market gardening. Urban Metabolism: London Sustainability Scenarios, H. Girardet, Environmental Consultant, UK (2006)

Potential heat from Water Treatment

Potential heat from Sewer Mining

GLA_Londonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Zero Carbon Energy Resource: Secondary Heat, Report Phase 1 (2013)

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

2.0 Existing Context 2.6 Transport Flow Analysis

Rail Rail Lines Stations PTAL Rating No. of passengers

Bicycle Parking Store Route Quiteway Superhighway

Road Bus Station Road Major Road Numbered Major Highway

Road Traffic Count_ https://data.gov.uk/dataset/gb-road-traffic-counts Stations, Bus stops, Bicycle stops/shops_http://download.geofabrik.de/europe/great-britain/england/greater-london.html Station Usage_https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/train-station-usage Roads/Rail Lines/Bicycle lines_https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/openstreetmap http://www.mapcruzin.com/free-england-arcgis-maps-shapefiles.htm PTAL_https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/london-area-classification

2.0 Existing Context 2.6 Transport Flow Analysis

Transport

London has one of the best transport systems in the world, boasting aviation connections with global reach and a vast network of railways, Tube lines, highways, local roads, bus routes, pedestrian and cycle links, trams and light railways. Mostly these work well, and significant investment has been made in recent years. However, every Londoner and London business has experienced the frustration and economic costs when they do not - and there is certainly room for improvement, including through increased reliability and reduced crowding. Londonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s growth also poses additional challenges; extensions will be needed to reach new or expanding neighborhoods, and improved accessibility will be required to cater for more people, old and young. London currently consumes around 20 million tonnes of oil equivalent every year, or two supertankers a week, producing some 60 million tonnes of CO2. In a world affected by climate change and limitations on the use of fossil fuels, every effort needs to be made to wean London off the routine use of oil, gas and coal. In addition, needs to look at the potential for significant reductions in car use. The London congestion charge, together with support for public transport and cycling have helped to significantly reduce carbon emissions. Much more needs to be done to assure mode switching from public transport to cycling, etc., to enable efficient, flexible journeys. Urban Metabolism: London Sustainability Scenarios, H. Girardet, Environmental Consultant, UK (2006)

Potential heat from Underground Rail Ventilation

GLA_Londonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Zero Carbon Energy Resource: Secondary Heat, Report Phase 1 (2013)

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

2.0 Existing Context 2.7 Energy Flow Analysis

Heat Loads Local government estate Other Public Buildings Sport & Leisure facilities Multi-address buildings Education facilities Museums & Art Galleries NHS Hotels Private commercial Social Housing Estate Private residential

Heat Source Minor Source Major Source Bunhill CHP Bunhill 2 CHP District Heating Potential DH

Electricity Electricity Usage Tower Substation Cable Over Head line

Energy Consumption_https://data.gov.uk/dataset/energy_consumption_in_the_uk Energy Usage_https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/london-area-classification Heat Source_https://data.gov.uk/dataset/london-heat-map District Heating_https://data.gov.uk/dataset/london-heat-map Substation_https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/openstreetmap http://www.mapcruzin.com/free-england-arcgis-maps-shapefiles.htm Electricity Lines_https://data.gov.uk/dataset/london-heat-map Heat Loads_ https://data.gov.uk/dataset/the-uk-renewable-energy-statistics-database Bunhill 1+2_ https://www.islington.gov.uk/environment/energy-services/bunhill-heat-power

2.0 Existing Context 2.7 Energy Flow Analysis

Energy

The most significant advances in engineering for sustainable development are likely to be found in urban energy systems. CHP systems are offer very major opportunities, halving fossil fuel use as compared to conventional power stations. Cities such as Copenhagen, Helsinki and Hanover have shown that CHP, coupled with very high levels of energy efficiency, can offer huge benefits. A diversity of national sources of energy supply will improve security, affordability and sustainability of London’s energy supply; and the efficient production of locally produced energy incorporating a diverse range of energy sources, from gas through to large scale heat pumps utilizing waste heat will also have a significant role to play in reducing London’s carbon output and making London’s energy more secure and resilient. Urban Metabolism: London Sustainability Scenarios, H. Girardet, Environmental Consultant, UK (2006)

Potential heat from Power Stations

Potential heat from Substations

GLA_London’s Zero Carbon Energy Resource: Secondary Heat, Report Phase 1 (2013)

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

2.0 Existing Context 2.8 Decentralized Energy Capacity Study

Decentralized Energy Capacity Study

District Heat and Energy has the potential to supply over 25% of Londonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s demand for heating and electricity, with significant reductions in carbon emissions depending on fuel source and the carbon intensity of electricity from the national grid. The initial development of DE schemes is centered around areas under the control of a single land owner (universities, hospitals, large new build developments) and schemes being developed by local authorities as part of their climate change and fuel poverty strategies. These schemes could act as catalysts for wider area schemes through interconnection but they will need to be significantly scaled up to deliver the deployment potential. Beyond 2031 a switch to heat sources lower in carbon than gas CHP will be required to continue delivering carbon savings in line with the national and London targets to achieve an 80% reduction in CO2 emissions on 1990 levels by 2050. Should this accompany a rise in natural gas prices (due to supply shortages or environmental policy), larger-scale heat networks offer opportunities to capture and use supplies of waste heat from new build low or zero carbon power stations located outside London.

k r o w e r

SITE

GLA, Decentralized energy capacity study, Phase 3: Road map to deployment (2011)

Road map for realizing the potential of decentralized energy.

GLA, Decentralized energy capacity study, Phase 3: Road map to deployment (2011) GLA_Londonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Zero Carbon Energy Resource: Secondary Heat, Report Phase 1,2,3. (2013) GLA_Decentralised energy capacity study, Phase 1,2,3. (2011) Buro Happold_Islington Borough Energy Mapping, Phase 1,2 Borough Wide Heat Mapping Mayor of London_London Heat Map Manual (2014) Ricardo-AEA_Projections of CHP capacity and use to 2030 (2013) Bunhill CHP_www.islington.gov.uk/heatnetwork Bunhill 2 Energy Centre_http://cullinanstudio.com/project/bunhill-2-energy-centre

2.0 Existing Context 2.9 Site Overview

Overview ell Gosw Road

Energy The site has the potential to form the coupling between the barbican and Bunhill energy centers, successfully linking the networks together will help to reduce costs and eliminate risks. Energy will be produced onsite from CHP and Waste incineration.

Connectivity The main route through the site is Goswell road. Providing an opportunity to introduce an E-loop bicycle transport network to reduce the amount of freight traffic in London. The main source of secondary heat is captured from the underground rail system. The arrival of crossrail will increase developments and need for energy.

Waste

Goswell

The main sewage line on Goswell road is a source of sewage heat mining. Providing an opportunity for heat along the street and a possible new urban system arising from that. Solid waste is processed and distributed on-site and Biowaste is incinerated. Heat is captured and distributed into network.

Road

Biota Biomass is collected and processed on-site. New green space is created within the new â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Metabolic parkâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Water is chilled/heated at the Barbican water source. Goswell street to form new green corridor.

Distributed Local Energy Food

Distributed Local Energy Goods/Economic Activity

Waste

Building stock All existing building stock to be retro fitted with district heating and metabolic flow integration products.

Recovered goods

Grey Water

Heat Heat

Heat Grey Water Waste Biomass

Heat

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

2.0 Existing Context 2.10 Built Context

Built Context

The site contains a number of buildings, mixed in use and character. They ranged in height from one to five storeys and range from a mixture of Victorian industrial structures to a mid-20th century concrete and brick hotel. The taller buildings were prevalent on the south end of the site, along Long Lane, whilst a series of single-storey structures were present to the north, their height being constrained by having foundations on a decking structure over the railway lines below. A few of these buildings have been demolished as part of the Crossrail enabling works. The site is presently a construction work site with the existing buildings removed and basements exposed. This provides a clear view of the surrounding built environment. The tallest neighboring structure adjacent to the site is found to the north at 23-28 Charterhouse Street. At six-storeys, it features a mix of Portland Stone to the ground floor and homogeneous brown brick above. To the south east of this and directly adjacent to development site are mid 20th century curtain walled structures made of dappled brown and purple bricks with strong horizontal emphasis afforded by long, subdivided elevations and fenestration patterns. These buildings respected the previous structures on the development site in terms of their scale and massing albeit in a contemporary guise. The south of the site is dominated by Victorian structures lining Long Lane. These buildings are fairly plain in their construction often featuring segmental headed windows and a mixture of stock bricks with red brick dressings or stucco dressings. Some exceptions can be found in slightly more ornate structures which feature decorative floral stone dressings to their string courses and ornate console brackets to their pub fronts. The majority of structures lining this route are four storeys in height although their scale and massing differ, dependent on their age.

The most assuming and imposing structure in the area is the Grade II listed Smithfield Market which dominates the western elevation of the proposed ETH along Lindsey Street. This elevation incorporates a number of decorative elements and is complemented by the continuous, modern glass canopy inserted above the ground floor windows. The palette of materials here is a mixture of red brick, decorative iron work, and portland stone, together with the mature, green patina of copper cladding to the cupolas surmounting the corner towers. The main podium structure of the market building is 13m tall, whilst the towers rise up to 27m tall (generally equivalent to 6/7 storeys). There is a fairly open feel to the area due to the low lying nature of the surrounding structures, with the exception of views directly to the north and to the east, although to the north east views towards Charterhouse Square provide a welcome open, green space to the predominately tight urban grain of the surrounding area. The challenges imposed by the built context therefore include addressing the setting of the Grade II listed market building and the close proximity of the Charterhouse Square Conservation Area. The proposal for the site has provided a welcome opportunity through the creation of a single development site encompassing the entire block, mirroring and complimenting the setting of Smithfield Marketâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Lindsey street elevation whilst resolving the enclosure of Charterhouse Square.

2.0 Existing Context 2.6 SITE HISTORY AND PLANNING HISTORY

2.0 Existing Context 2.11 Planning Context

HERITAGE Context LISTING (22-MAR-2002) Planning

parking originally for 1,000 Objectives cars over 121,000 Planning

report 1998), 41-50, 92-106. TQ2950380919

USED AS A CAR PARK

BREWER STREET CAR PARK, SOHO, LONDON W1F 0LA | DESIGN PRINCIPLES DOCUMENT

2016

2015

LONDON FASHION WEEK TEMPORARY EVENTS

70% CAPACITY CAR PARK

2014

2013

FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR POWERFOCAL LTD. 2011

2012

PLANNING APPLICATION FOR OFFICE, RETAIL AND HIGH END RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (REGECTED AND LISTED)

BUILT

•

Conservation Area located within the London Borough of Islington; and The site borders Charterhouse Square, which is protected under the London Squares Act.

2002

sq ft of parking apace over five floors. Largely Books and journals unencumbered floor plates with ramped access Multi-storey car park. 1929. Robert Sharp (1884Calladine, T, Morrison, K, Road Transport Buildings, concrete beams the carry floors of nearby Today, the area immediately around the site is significantly at west side, Heavy • Preserve or enhance character 1950) with J.J. Joass (1868-1952). Steel and (1998), 41-50,92 formerly in Areas; centre of each floor influenced by the operations of Smithfield, particularly the above. TurntablesConservation concrete frame, glazed ceramic front by elevation, unique additional dimension provided the early morning now removed.• Former Respect the settings of surrounding listed buildings and lay-out included a chauffeurs’ meat market. Flourishing craftside workshops continue some of minimize any impact on historic fabric as a National result of Grid Reference: TQ 29501 80919 copper-clad dome, brick-clad and rear canteen, cafe and kitchen on front of first floor, with the other traditional local trades, such as textiles and jeweleryconstruction; elevations; steel Crittall windows. PLAN: long of eachthe floor; garage and making and the strong influences of the numerous creativebathroom within • tower Complement existing urban grain and local rectangular site with forecourt to front, projecting floor, with in studios and a thriving restaurant and bar culture provide a store to front of ground environment, both petrol historicpumps and contemporary; tower at south-west corner. withboth fourday and forecourt. These • Maximize the development unique, vibrant character to Basement the area during features have all gone. opportunities for a highquality OSD design suitable for this central London night. upper floors, reached via ramps along west side of location, and; building. Lifts and stairs behind tower; other stairs The wider area is characterized by a mixture of commercial HISTORY:• Comply with the Crossrail Act onuses centre of eastoffices, side, near Place entrance.active including someIngestre residential and generally EXTERIOR: style frontrange elevation. frontages atClassical-Moderne ground floor level with a wide of shops, It opened in mid-1929 as the ‘Lex Garage’, this is cafes and business activities. To theopen. east the areas Ground floorother originally part-glazed, now Upper flattened during the Blitz are characterized by mid and high-among the earliest surviving ramped multi-storey car floors fronted with seven bay front articulated with rise modernist structures including notable developments ofparks to be built in the country and was described at pilasters, with alternating of terracotta and Lane. the post-War era such as strips the Barbican and 1 Golden the time as ‘probably the largest and best-equipped windows, with plain square panels below each building for the service of the motor-car that has yet Key Planning designations: opening; parapet above. Recessed easternmost bay appeared in this congested city’. It was intended • There are a number of listed buildings located within the with narrow windows to each floor. Canted tower to to serve the West End, especially Theatreland, to immediate vicinity of the site. Located directly to the north left of four floors, Grade with plain rectangular are several II listed structures openings and the Grade I which increasing numbers were coming by car. on each floor to the Directly front three sides; Charterhouse. to the west open is the dome Grade II listed Its monumental street presence endows it with Marketfront and to south are several other listed aboveSmithfield cornice. Blank of the tower formerly sported structures including the Grade I listed St Bartholomew considerable power. a painted inscription panel reading ‘LEX GARAGE’. the Great Church. It is essential therefore that the design Four bay return southern part of Lexington Street of the new to structure complements the setting of these SOURCES: The Architect & Building News, June with pilasters. Eastern flank elevation of unadorned structures. 21 1929, 818-20; The Builder June 14 1929, 1079; • In addition to the numerous listed buildings surrounding concrete frame with brick in-fill and similar windows, RCHME, Road Transport Buildings (unpublished the site there are several conservation areas. To the west containing secondary entrance. Faded painted and south is located Smithfield Conservation Area and to sign reading GARAGE north return.Charterhouse INTERIOR: Square the north and northon east is located

1929

12.5% CAPACITY CAR PARK

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

2.0 Existing Context 2.12 Decentralized Energy Capacity References

Decentralized Energy Capacity References

1. Bunhill Heat and Power - is Islington Councilâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s groundbreaking, innovative scheme retrofitting district heating in an inner-city environment. It is our first district scale heat network and serves over 850 homes and two leisure centers. The heat network and energy center were completed in winter 2012 and provide cheaper, greener heat to Islington residents.

2. Bunhill 2 Power Centre - is intended to be a demonstrator project to the other London Boroughs and EU cities seeking to make best use of their urban waste heat sources. It includes the capture of waste heat from an electricity sub-station and from the London Underground tube system via a heat exchange coil; the first project of its kind in the UK and one of the first in Europe. 3. Energy Hub + Nursery - Duggan Morris architects propose a new CHP center that will supply 30o0 new homes plus shops offices and leisure spaces. A nursery providing early years education to families at Elephant Park and the surrounding community as well as job and training opportunities for local residents. A community cafe that will provide a meeting point for the local community, as well as a flexible community space, managed by the cafe, and designed to accommodate a range of community events. A pocket park next to the energy hub, with energy themed play facilities for the local children to enjoy.

4. London Olympic Energy Centre - The energy centers uses (CHP) engines, which generate electricity and produce hot water. The hot water is distributed throughout the Park by a network of pipes providing heat to venues, commercial buildings and residential properties. Chilled water is also produced by passing the hot water through an absorption chiller. This is then distributed by pipes to provide airconditioning in some of the Parkâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s buildings. 5. The False Creek Energy Centre - integrated with a sewage pumping station, recovers heat from untreated urban wastewater, a renewable energy source. Similar to a geothermal application, heat pumps transfer the energy to a hot water distribution system. Sewage heat recovery outperforms most geothermal systems, thanks to a warmer heat source and lower installation cost.

2.0 Existing Context 2.13 Enclosed Space References

Enclosed Space References

1. The Crystal Palace - Designed by Joseph Paxton, the building was 564 long, with an interior height of 39 m. The introduction of the sheet glass method into Britain by Chance Brothers in 1832 made possible the production of large sheets of cheap but strong glass, and its use in the Crystal Palace created a structure with the greatest area of glass ever seen in a building and astonished visitors with its clear walls and ceilings that did not require interior lights.

2. 17th Century Winter garden - Traditionally a “Winter Garden” isn’t simply a vegetable patch in December - the term began back in the 17th century when it became fashionable amongst the European nobility to build themselves large conservatories attached to their palaces to house tropical and sub-tropical plants all year round, the implication being that an English summer may as well be winter to a tropical plant. 3. The Ford Foundation building and atrium - completed in 1967, by Kevin Roche John Dinkeloo and Associates. The building’s exterior is largely composed of glass panels which creates a temperate environment that is ideal for the atrium’s subtropical garden, while also creating a seamless flow of green space between the atrium and Tudor City Park to the east.

4. Sheffield Winter Garden - is one of the largest temperate glasshouses to be built in the UK during the last hundred years, and the largest urban glasshouse anywhere in Europe. It is home to more than 2,000 plants from all around the world. It has an intelligent Building Management System which controls fans and vents to make sure the plants are cooled in summer and kept warm in winter. 5. Palaeontology Research Centre - H Arquitectes and DATAAE teamed up to design the ICTA-ICP building for the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona campus in the Catalonian municipality of Cerdanyola del Vallès. The concrete structure is wrapped and protected by a low-cost exterior bioclimatic skin. By installing a greenhouse-industrialized system that opens and closes its mechanisms automatically, the solar gain and ventilation are regulated. This way, it is possible to raise the interior temperature naturally and guarantee a base of comfort in the circulation spaces as well as in the in-between spaces.

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

3.0 Existing Buildings

3.0 Existing Site 3.1 Historical Context

Historical Context

The proposal is located within an area rich in historical significance being located just outside the original London Wall. Prior to the Norman period this area was a mix of rural and agricultural land {the origins of the name Farringdon th mean ‘fern covered hill’) and the Smithfield area was used as a Roman Cemetery between the 15 and 4 centuries AD. During the medieval period, the expansion of London and the ensuing over-crowding led to the foundation of monastic houses outside the City walls, particularly in the Clerkenwell and the Smithfield areas.

Copperplate Map c.1550s

Ogilby and Morgan 1676-79

Farringdon Road delineates the old course of the River Fleet. This river was canalized in the late 17th century and a proliferation of wharfs and warehouses dominated its edges. In addition to its maritime activity, the surrounding area was renowned for its livestock trading, centered around Smithfield Market. By 1726 the River Fleet was largely covered over to form the twin culverts of the Fleet Sewer as far north as the former City boundary at Holborn Bridge, leaving an open channel through the Farringdon area and beyond and through the utilization of part of this channel, the world’s first underground line, the Metropolitan Railway arrived at Farringdon Street Station in 1863. The line originally ran from Farringdon to Paddington, a distance of 4 miles (6 km), but in 1865 the station was moved to its present day location when the Metropolitan Railway extended the line to Moorgate. This paved the way for the development of Smithfield Market as it stands today. Designed by Victorian architect Sir Horace Jones and opened in 1868, it allowed livestock to brought directly to the market by train. Other trades such as textiles and ironmongery also thrived throughout this market neighborhood.

R. Horwood 1792-99

Ogilby and Morgan 1676-79 Ordnance Survey 1930s

In the 1870s, the slums of Farringdon that had built up over some 300 years were cleared by driving through a number of major roads including Farringdon Road and Clerkenwell Road, however the broad urban structure created by the religious institutions and the finer grain of the historic streets are still evident today. This is juxtaposed with the extensive late C20th developments east of Aldersgate and south of Long Lane which were redeveloped after suffering extensive bomb damage during WWII.

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

3.0 Existing Site 3.2 History of Barbican Station

Barbican Station

The station was opened on 23rd December 1865 with the name Aldersgate Street. The stationâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s name was shortened to Aldersgate on 1st November 1910 and it was renamed again on 24th October 1924 to Aldersgate & Barbican. Its present name was adopted on 1st December 1968. Train services were disrupted during the Second World War when the station suffered severe bomb damage in the Blitz, particularly in December 1941. This led to the removal of the upper floors and in 1955 the remainder of the street-level building was demolished. The Thameslink platforms at Barbican Station were closed in March 2009 as part of the Thameslink Pro-gramme to allow Farringdon to have its mainline plat-forms extended across Thameslinkâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Moorgate branch. As a result, Barbican is no longer a multi-modal station.

3.0 Existing Site 3.3 Implications of Building Above an Underground Station

Barbican Station

2. Track and platform 4 not in use.

Disused station

1. The enclosed nature of the site poses significant issues regarding construction. There is no potential for heavy goods access via Carthusian Street or Aldersgate Street, and Hayne Street is limited due to its narrow dimensions. The main access, therefor, must be from Long Lane, although many of these access points are privately owned by the surrounding buildings, and so, permission will need to be granted in order for the use of machinery in these areas. 2. Track and platform 4 not in use. This track used to provide Thameslink services but is no longer in use. It is undecided as to whether the track will ever be used again but it is important that it be maintained in case the decision is made to reinstate it. 3. The minimum platform width is defined by the speed of the servicing trains. The â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Sâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Stock trains travel at a maximum of 100mph and so the minimum width is 2.5m from the edge of the platform to the face of the nearest building structure or platform furniture.

1. The enclosed nature of the site

4. Access to platform level. There is currently only one access point from street level. 3. Minimum platform width

1. The enclosed nature of the site

4. Access to platform level

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

3.0 Existing Site 3.4 Existing Structure and Geology

LONDON CLAY FORMATION STIFF GREY BROWN HETEROGENEOUS CLAY WITH CLOSELY SPACED FISSURES.

-12 m

WOOLWICH & READING BED FORMATION SHELLY OCCASIONALLY LAMINATED SILTY CLAY OR CLAYEY SILT WITH A LITTLE FINE SAND AND IMPERSISTENT HARD LIMESTONE BEDS

- 2 8m

THANET SANDS GREENISH AND BROWNISH GREY, SILTY, FINE-GRAINED SAND. BIOTURBATION.

- 3 7m

Proposed Crossrail Tunnels. The Crossrail Safe Guarding Area specifies that TFL own a Protective zone around the tunnels: 6m above, 3m to each side, and everything below. Any piles will therefore need to avoid this zone.

CHALK POORLY CEMENTED AND POROUS, TYPICALLY MASSIVELY BEDDED AND WELL JOINTED, FISSURED WHITE LIMESTONE

- 5 8m

PRESENT DAY GROUND WATER LEVEL

3.0 Existing Site 3.4 Existing Structure and Geology

Barbican Station Structural Support

Retaining Wall is a structure designed and constructed to resist the lateral pressure of soil to serve a desired change in ground elevation. On site we have a gravity wall in place, the actual columns are supporting the retaining walls, the strength of brick columns: Assuming the dimensions of the brick columns between each arch are 2.5m x 0.9m = 2.25m = 2,250,000mm > 945kN can be taken by each column. Strength of ground below: I assumed that below each column is a stepping base that spreads load out 300mm such that the area transferred onto London Clay is 3m x 1.5m = 4.5m > 450kN So the limiting factor is more the ground than the load possible by the column, therefore concrete piling is proposed to reinforce it. No Build Zone. The lowest potential building line is defined by the height dimension of the TFL tube stock plus 50mm clearance. The TFL tube stock which run through this station are S7 and S8, and have a height dimension of 3680mm. Therefore, the minimum building line is positioned at 3720mm above the train track level.

Gravity walls depend on the weight of their mass to resist pressures from behind and will sometimes have an increased footprint, to improve stability.

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

4.0 Design Proposal

4.0 Design Proposal 4.1 Design Development and Consultation

Design Development

The design proposal has been developed using the following criteria: 1. High level thinking around the Decentralized Energy Capacity Study by the GLA and how it can inform a new type of architectural infrastructural hybrid. 2. ARUP’s study of infrastructure costs as two options, one a centralized model and two a hybrid. This report concentrates on the design within a ‘hybrid’ scenario, where cities will become increasingly more efficient and self-sufficient and therefore less reliant on national networks – even though national networks will retain a role in delivering energy supply. This scenario would support Mayor plans to supply 25% of London’s energy requirements according to a decentralized model by 2025. Physical and legislative site constraints with which opportunities arise. 3. The combination of a series of complex systems of relationships both in a programmatic and functional way and in an experiential, emotive and social way all based around a new form of heat and energy utilization. 4. Sustainable technology that can be easily identifiable by the public in scale and complexity. 5. The realization that the strength of the project is only possible when collaboration takes place across scales and professions.

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

4.0 Design Proposal 4.2 Proposed Demolition

Proposed Demolition

In conversations with the developers of the Crossrail Farringdon stations it was revealed that TFL owned and partly occupied all buildings within the demarcated site. TFL plans to redevelop the site over the coming decade in order to meet the new demand brought on by the arrival of Crossrail. The Site was originally going to be re-developed as I have indicated in 2015 but due to a tenant issue has had to be delayed until 2019. Work has gone ahead on the Crossrail Farringdon East Ticket Hall mixed development. My proposal disregards this Ticket Hall development and assumes the site is developed as originally proposed. Therefore all buildings in the area are to be demolished to allow for the proposal, special attention needs to be given to the preservation of the existing listed buildings.

Preserve Listed buildings

CONSIDERATIONS

• LU rail lines which pass under the northern boundary of

•

the site will remain operational during Crossrail works. As such, design of the works must ensure that the railway operations are fully protected; The LU Moorgate Branch railway cutting divides the site. This railway is temporarily disused and requires removal and reconstruction to facilitate construction of the new proposal. When works are complete the Moorgate branch will be brought back into use as a rail siding. The design of the proposal has to be cognizant of the LU Moorgate branch requirements such as minimum vertical and horizontal clearances; The basement of the Grade II Listed Smithfield Market extends to the western boundary of the site. Works must minimize any interventions to the historic fabric of the building; Lindsey Street & Hayne Street bridges to the west and the east of the site are both Victorian bridge structures over the LU rail lines. The proposal has been designed specifically to avoid placing loads onto these historic structures to avoid any risk of compromising their structural integrity. Limits of Deviation both horizontal and vertical as defined by the Crossrail Act restrict the bulk and massing of the building that can be constructed on site;

Extent of demolition

Utilize abandoned train tracks for heat storage.

4.0 Design Proposal

4.2 PROPOSED DEMOLITION

4.0 Design Proposal 4.3 Demolition Re-use www.autodesk.com/revit

Cradle-Cradle Process

Demolition Re-use

CUT AND CARVE

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

BUILDING B DEMOLITION

unknown

??? tonnes

??? panels

??? tonnes

DECONSTRUCTION

glazing

metal

recycled

energy recovery

????????? kg

(Existing Buildings)

other

export

concrete concrete concrete FLOORS + WALLS

waste emissions

STRUCTURE

RECOVERY

95%

98%

70%

RECOVERY

92%

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

Recyclable materials such as concrete, blockwork, Consultant timber, metal and plasterboard will be placed in separate Address Address containers for reprocessing and reconstruction. Individual Phone Fax sub-contractors will be responsible for breaking down and e-mail placing all rubbish arising from their works in the wheelie bins provided, segregating recyclable elements where possible. All to be carried out on-site.

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

Regular audits will be conducted of the waste recycling company, their transfer facility and landfill sites as well as sub-contractor removal of waste. These audits are intended to confirm compliance with legislation and to ensure every effort is being made to maximize the recycling of waste generated from site. Audits of waste will be carried out to ensure waste is minimized and percentage waste by waste stream is checked. No. Description

Date

FACADE

Fig. 43:Demolition

1 Fig. 44:Proposed building on site

3D - Structural Iso building DEMOLISION

3D - Structural Iso building whole building

GLASS

AGGREGATE

INFRASTRUCTURE

PAVILLION

INSULATION & FRAME

Full wheelie bins will then be removed by the Logistics Team and taken to the site recycling area (position to be agreed prior to commencement on site). A sufficient number of bins will be held on site to ensure that bins are always available to subcontractors. This waste will then be collected by mobile compactor and transported to a licensed transfer facility where it will be segregated for onward transportation to various recycling houses. Residual waste is sent to landfill.

LANDSCAPE GLASS

Fig. 42:Retain Listed Facade

It is estimated that approximately 90-95% of all compactable site waste will be reconstituted or used as waste to energy. When the waste is received at a recycling facility, all copies of transfer notes and written descriptions of the waste will be submitted. Mixed waste will be deposited in the transfer facility and sorted into its key elements.

FURNITURE & FIXTURES

RECONSTRUCTION WAL LS & CEILING

92.5%

NCP ltd.

There will then be a basic pre- sort of the waste into heavy and light material.

Wasteminster

Specialist and hazardous waste management will be carried out by the relevant subcontractors, under appropriate control measures. Axo Of sites

0001

Project number

1706-12

Date

Author

Drawn by

Fig. 41:Existing Building retained

Fig. 45:Proposed new build

BREWER STREET CAR PARK, SOHO, LONDON W1F 0LA | DESIGN PRINCIPLES DOCUMENT 3

3D - Structural Iso building Existing Copy 1

3D - Structural Iso building Proposed Copy 1

Checker

Checked by

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document Scale

phasing

P70

2/2017 5:39:20 AM

Diagram shows the desired cradle to cradle re-use/reconstitution of the materials from site demolition. It is estimated that at least 92.5% of all materials can be re-used in the construction of the proposals concrete Floor Columns and First floor superstructure. Saving significant time and money for all parties involved.

4.0 Design Proposal 4.4 Design Considerations

Design Considerations

DESIGN FOR DISASSEMBLY AND REUSE Cost of demolition is currently €20-30/m2. On-site sorting processes can generate ~20% disposal cost-savings, and much higher recycling and re-use rates. Recycling of metals slows depletion of natural resources, avoids mine waste products, and it decreases energy demand up to 90%, in respect to metal from-ore production. DESIGN FOR WASTE MINIMALIZATION Modular construction and fastening technologies (zarkopanen, blue casco) can reduce costs and construction time. Avoid “Double payment” of overordered materials by coordinating with suppliers for ‘just in time delivery’. Savings could amount to 3% of total construction costs, and minimized site-generated waste. OPTIMIZE WATER COLLECTION AND USE Collection and use of rain water for toilets could save 25% of overall water use, reducing strain on municipal sewage infrastructure. On-site water treatment could earn exemptions or reduced costs on municipal infrastructure fees. DESIGN WITH ENERGY USE IN MIND The incorporation of phase change materials, combined with optimal orientation and shape of building for passive energy could save up to 30% in annual energy savings. Onsite biodigestion can convert all organic waste into biogas, heat, clean water, and nutrients which can be used on-site. Provide in-house services like laundry, babysitting, and private showers to reduce unnecessary transportation and promote productivity. FLEXIBLE AND ADAPTIVE DESIGNS Building components should be easy to replace and upgrade. The investment of an additional 3% of project costs in the design phase can reduce construction costs by 10%, and make maintenance easier during the use phase. “Flexible building services” could save an organization up to €750 per moved person per year. This strategy can also provide higher value for sub-leasing.

4.0 Design Proposal 4.2 PROPOSED DESIGN CONCEPT

4.0 Design Proposal 4.5 Design Objectives

Design Objectives

+ 02

Fig. 47:Listed Elements

Fig. 46:Existing Building

The proposal offers a rare opportunity to enhance the Smithfield Market area as well as improve transportation links. The proposal aims to achieve this by meeting the key design objectives, a combination of Crossrail and site-specific driven objectives, outlined below: • Provide World Class Customer Experience • Provide a Positive Contribution to the Special Character of the Area • Provide Enhanced Amenity Value • Provide Efficient Function

The market will provide an inspirational, functional, inclusive and enjoyable environment that is safe to construct, use and maintain. It will become a benchmark for a well-designed and environmentally sustainable infrastructure, delivering the best value for money. This will be achieved by: • Providing an inclusive, enjoyable and inspirational market environment that is responsive to its local environment and ‘says something about its destination’ in its expression of structure, materiality, and detailing; Fig. 49:Cut buildinga safe facility for visitors through its design as a • the Providing in half to reinstate simple and clear volume with penetration of daylight. It will Pieter Street also be safe to construct and maintain in its detailing and selection of materials.

The goal of the design is to make a positive contribution to the surrounding urban fabric whilst achieving the wide array of functional requirements and overcoming technically challenging obstacles this will be achieved by: • Being respectful of the setting of the Grade II* listed Smithfield Market in response to Lindsey Street frontage and station entrance massing; • Minimizing adverse impacts from construction on the historic fabric of the Grade II* listed Smithfield Market; • Minimizing impacts on Smithfield Market operations during Crossrail works; • Focusing on sensitive placement of station ventilation and emergency egress/ access to reduce land-take requirements and impacts on neighboring buildings.

Fig. 48:Proposed Programs to go on site

BREWER STREET CAR PARK, SOHO, LONDON W1F 0LA | DESIGN PRINCIPLES DOCUMENT

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

4.0 Design Proposal 4.0 Design Proposal

4.5 KEY DESIGN PRINCIPLES

4.6 Design Vision

The key design principles have developed out of the project development .... ( need to focus) 1. Listed elements within the building 2. The scale of waste management equipment to deal with local waste input 3. Fully utilise the programmatic density found within Soho on the large site. 4.

BREWER STREET CAR PARK, SOHO, LONDON W1F 0LA | DESIGN PRINCIPLES DOCUMENT

29, 971 sqm

2250 sqm Social Space 3000 sqm Residential 20, 495 sqm 2250 sqm Social Space

7646 sqm urban agriculture

4000 sqm Residential

4.0 Design Proposal

20, 495 sqm 1250 sqm social spaces

4.4 SCHEDULE OF ACCOMMODATION

13,210 sqm

5064 sqm Materials lab

7646 sqm urban agriculture

4000 sqm Residential

4450 sqm urban agriculture

1913 sqm Office

1250 sqm social spaces

600 sqm Car parking

2167 sqm food bank

13,210 sqm

3455 sqm Innovation lab 1913 sqm Office 2040 sqm food bank

5064 sqm Materials lab

4450 sqm urban agriculture

3455 sqm Innovation lab 4700 sqm energy centre

29, 971 sqm Site foot print

Site GIA

Residential

Energy Centre

Precedent Program 3000 sqm Car Park

20, 495 sqm 40 apartments 4000 sqm 7646 sqm urban agriculture

4700 sqm 4000 sqm Residential

16 apartments( 46 sqm) 1b 2p 5064 sqm Materials lab 14 apartments( 73 sqm) 2b 4p

11,297 sqm Car Park

Site foot print

Energy Centre

Residential

40 apartments 4000 sqm

150 sqm Holding tanks

Precedent Program

Site GIA 40000 sqft

Food Bank

14 apartments( 73 sqm) 2b 4p 4 apartments( 112sqm) 3b 5p

900 sqm Pre-treatment, (waste bunker Hall)

6 apartments( 145 sqm) 4b 5p

2040 sqm

150 sqm Fertilizer sorage3450sqm

200 sqm Charity Depot

200 sqm Bottomash storage 290 sqm Workshops

200 sqm Fuelling station 120 sqm Admin (BOH) 150 sqm Fertilizer sorage

350 sqm Permanent display 170 sqm Screening 210 sqm temporary display 300 sqm Gas 200collection sqm Storage

Social Spaces 1250 sqm

1050 sqm Supermarket

150 sqm Generators

Urban Agriculture

200 sqm Fuelling station 4450 sqm 120 sqm Admin (BOH) 150 sqm 2500 sqm Fertilizer sorage Aquaponics 200 sqm Bottomash 1500 sqmstorage Seasonal Garden

480 sqm Lecture

1000 sqm Greenhouses

235 sqm Paper materials 235 sqm Plastic materials

450 sqm Livestock

235 sqm Metal materials

170 sqm Screening

150 sqm Generators

6 apartments( 145 sqm) 4b 5p

355 sqm Admin 480 sqm Lecture 700 sqm Delivery 235 sqm Paper materials (Tipping Hall) 235 sqm Plastic materials 900 sqm Pre-treatment, 235 sqm Metal materials (waste bunker Hall) 235 sqm Bio materials 1100 sqm 300 sqm 1x1 mock updigestion spaces Anaerobic

355 sqm Admin

395 sqm Brewery/Distillary

235 sqm Bio materials

300 sqm Gas collection

40000 sqft

310 sqm Innovation pods 4700 sqm

310 sqm Innovation pods

1100 sqm Anaerobic digestion

150 sqm Holding tanks

4 apartments( 112sqm) 3b 5p

40000 sqft Innovation Lab

120 sqm Admin (BOH)

160 sqm Bakery

Energy Centre

150 sqm Holding tanks

200 sqm Fuelling station

235 sqm Restaurant 700 sqm Delivery (Tipping Hall)

1050 sqm 14 Supermarket apartments( 73 sqm) 2b 4p

Program Consolidation

150 sqm Generators

4700 sqm 16 apartments( 46 sqm) 1b 2p

16 apartments( 46 sqm) 395 sqm Brewery/Distillary 1b 2p

300 sqm 4700 sqm energy centre Gas collection

3450sqm 290 sqm Workshops

160 sqm Bakery

170 sqm Screening

9844 sqm energy centre

2040 sqm

apartments 4000 sqm 23540 sqm Restaurant

900 600 sqmsqm Car parking Pre-treatment, (waste bunker Hall) 3455 sqm Innovation lab 1100 sqm Anaerobic digestion 2040 sqm food bank

6 apartments( 145 sqm) 4b 5p

Innovation Lab

Residential

1250 sqm social spaces

Site GIA

Food Bank

200 sqm Charity Depot

700 sqm Delivery 4450 sqm urban agriculture (Tipping Hall)

2167 sqm food bank 4 apartments( 112sqm) 3b 5p

3000 sqm Car Park

Program Consolidation 11,297 sqm Car Park

Site foot print

2250 sqm Social Space

1913 sqm Office

2040 sqm food bank

11,297 sqm Car Park

3000 sqm Residential

13,210 sqm

4.6 Design Vision

600 sqm Car parking

2167 sqm food bank

9844 sqm energy centre 3000 sqm Car Park

4.0 Design Proposal

Design Vision

4700 sqm energy centre

Precedent Program

Program Consolidation

The design developed aims to deliver the objectives though a clearFood design vision. The key drivers of this vision are: Bank Innovation Lab • To build on the area’s rich and complex historical heritage 2040 sqm Nestled within the old market districts. • A market space with3450sqm a dual-aspect entrance that is 200 sqm Charity Depot seamless with the public realm. The proposal aims to 290 sqm Workshops 235 sqm Restaurant convey a sense of openness that is welcoming to public 310 sqm Innovation pods arriving from the street, and to provide the public with a 160 sqm Bakery sense of arrival 355 and as a result of internal lightsqmorientation Admin 395 sqm Brewery/Distillary wells penetrating 480through sqm Lecture the floor. • The character and overall scale of the design will be 1050 sqm Supermarket 235 sqm Paper materials developed 235 tosqm convey a sense of spaciousness, openness Plastic materials and comfort. Their generous proportions celebrate 235 sqm Metal materials Farringdon role as a key modern transportation “hub” for 235 sqm Bio materials London by providing the users with an enhanced nature 300 sqm 1x1 mock up spaces orientated experience. sqm Permanent display • A detailed350design that expresses the station’s functional 210 sqm temporary display purpose and showcases the area’s rich tradition of 200 sqm Storage craftsmanship. Details, wherever possible, will be designed to be simple, high quality, robust and durable. A reduced/simplified material palette made of few carefully Urban Agriculture Social Spaces selected materials and finishes will help creating a feel 1250 sqm of timelessness and a minimal neutral environment that sqm projects calm and 4450 tranquility. • Character of which is defined by a considered lighting scheme. The proposal 2500 sqm will enjoy a considerable amount Aquaponics as it is glazed or open on all sides, of daylight penetration it will play on the1500 area’s 24-hour nature, with a strong and sqm Seasonal warm artificial lighting scheme, glowing at night, almost Garden flame like, with light emanating through wooden slats. 1000 sqm Greenhouses

300 sqm 1x1 mock up spaces

450 sqm Livestock

350 sqm Permanent display

Food Park Programs

9844 sqm energy centre

210 sqm temporary display 200 sqm Storage

Food bank (restaurants, charity depot, bakery, brewery, supermarket)

Material lab (library, workspace, testing facility, 1x1 mock up area, innovation studios)

Energy centre (fuelling station, pipeline, tanks, generators, Social Spaces food crusher, fertilizer tanks, staff rooms)

Residences for 40 families (221 dw/ha/841 hr/ha.

Urban agriculture (small scale)

1250 sqm

4450 sqm

200 sqm Bottomash storage

Urban Agriculture

Food Park Programs Food bank (restaurants, charity depot, bakery, brewery, supermarket)

Material lab (library, workspace, testing facility, 1x1 mock up area, innovation studios)

Energy centre (fuelling station, pipeline, tanks, generators, food crusher, fertilizer tanks, staff rooms)

Residences for 40 families (221 dw/ha/841 hr/ha.

Urban agriculture (small scale)

2500 sqm Aquaponics 1500 sqm Seasonal Garden

BREWER STREET CAR PARK, SOHO, LONDON W1F 0LA | DESIGN PRINCIPLES DOCUMENT

1000 sqm Greenhouses 450 sqm Livestock

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

4.0 Design Proposal 4.7 Massing

Site showing extent of demolition

Ground Floor Landscape

Market and Retail Spaces

3 Primary Cores

First Floor Slab with Light Wells

Housing Units

Exterior Glazing and Facade

4.0 Design Proposal 4.8 Spatial Concept

Spatial Concept

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

4.0 Design Proposal 4.9 Circulation

Housing Circulation

FARRINGDON

BARBICAN

FARRINGDON

Ground Floor Circulation

Barbican Sky-bridge Resident Circulation Public Circulation Circulation Overview

4.0 Design Proposal 4.8 PROPOSED CIRCULATION SPACE OF BUILDING

4.0 Design Proposal 4.10 Internal Views

Conceptual Internal Views

Ground floor

First floor

Second Floor

Third Floor

Fourth floor

Fifth floor

Fig. 53:Circulation diagram between services and public circulation

BREWER STREET CAR PARK, SOHO, LONDON W1F 0LA | DESIGN PRINCIPLES DOCUMENT

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

4.0 Design Proposal 4.11 Total Areas

Total Areas 20, 495 sqm

9488 sqm Residential

18,152 sqm

350 sqm social spaces 2503 sqm Biota

2073 sqm Refurb

301 sqm Underground 164 sqm WC 7325 sqm Housing

2432 sqm Retail Edge 832 sqm Market Stalls

11,084 sqm 2073 sqm Existing

8754 sqm GF

3816 sqm Market

9011 sqm New Build Site foot print

Site GIA

Residential

Market

67 - 4x4m Houses 2240 sqm

Program Consolidation

Retail Edge

Biota Social Spaces 350 sqm

Single Units 857 sqm Floor Space 3816 sqm

SM Entrance 1200 sqm Water Retention 850 sqm

Double Units 1125 sqm 96 - 4x6m Houses 5088 sqm

30 - 2x2 Stalls 120 sqm 7 - 4x4 Stalls 112 sqm

15 - 6x6m Houses 2160 sqm 19 - 4x6 Stalls 456 sqm 3 - 8x6 Stalls 144 sqm

Corner Units 450 sqm WC 164 sqm

Restaurant Entrance 856 sqm

GF Circle 01 111 sqm GF Circle 02 110 sqm GF Circle 03 125 sqm Market Entrances 62 sqm

Housing Floor

Gardens 1125 sqm

143 Riser 4 m² 46.0 SF

39 m² 415.4 SF

144 Riser 5 m² 148 49.0 SF Fertiliser Storage

40 m² 431.4 SF

147 Holding Tanks

147 Holding

39 m² 415.4 SF

136 Aquaponics

144132 Riser Circulation 5 m² 55 m² 148 49.0593.0 SF SF Fertiliser Storage

127 m² 1371.0 SF

136 Aquaponics

55 m² 593.0 SF

132 Circulation

Tanks 127 m² 1371.0 SF

40 m² 431.4 SF

64.0 SF

06 Holding Tanks

37 m² 400.9 SF

90 m² 967.2 SF

01 Circulation

4 m²

97 Riser

40 m² 426.5 SF

41 m²

189 m² 2033.5 SF

142 Anerobic Biodigestors

145 Riser 4 m² 40.1 SF

189 m² 2033.5 SF

134 UP Riser145 1 m² 15.1 SF

133 Riser

135 Greenhouse 142 45 m² Anerobic Biodigestors 489.7 SF

1 m² Riser 15.1 SF4 m² 40.1 SF

134 UP Riser 1 m² 15.1 SF

133 Riser

45 m² 489.7 SF

135 Greenhouse

1 m² 15.1 SF

64.0 SF

168 m² 1811.5 SF

4 m² 46.1 SF

400.9 SF

12 Riser 18 Riser

4 m² 47.5 SF 2 m² 23.7 SF

101 Riser

65 m² 699.2 SF

38 m² 413.6 SF

64.7 SF

413.6 SF

93 Glass Storage

64.0 SF

465.4 SF

09 Cafe/Restaurant

64.7 SF

493.3 SF

50 m² 540.2 SF

146 Riser 5 m² 49.3 SF

10 m² 106.2 SF

94 Plastic Storage

5 m² 3 m² 58.7 SF30.5 SF

104 103 Elevator Riser

493.3 SF

50 m² 540.2 SF

94 Plastic Storage

5 m² 3 m² 58.7 SF30.5 SF

104 103 Elevator Riser

281 m² 3024.3 SF

74 Working Circulation

5 m² 3 m² 51.3 SF29.3 SF

73 13 Elevator Riser

08 69 m² 739.5Greenhouse SF 42 m² 452.2 SF

69 m² 739.5 SF

4 m² 2 m² 47.0 SF 20.0 SF

86 87 ElevatorRiser

4 m² 2 m² 47.0 SF 20.0 SF

86 87 ElevatorRiser

09 Cafe/Restaurant

99 Riser 4 m² 38.7 SF

80 Cafe/ Restaurant 66 m² 713.7 SF

99 Riser 4 m² 38.7 SF

66 m² 713.7 SF

80 Cafe/ Restaurant

101 Riser 88 4 m² 45.9 SF Circulation

413.6 SF

93 Glass Storage

64.7 SF

92 Paper Storage 47 m² 506.2 SF

244 m² 2629.4 SF

105 Pre- Treatment

43 m² 468.2 SF

95 Circulation

45 m² 489.5 SF

38 m² 413.6 SF

98 Riser

75 Anerobic Biodigestors

88 4 m² 45.9 SF Circulation 65 m² 699.2 SF

4 m² 46.1 SF

98 Riser

75 Anerobic Biodigestors

8246.7 SF Fertiliser Storage

442.5 SF 100 Riser

41 m²

81 Holding Tanks

1 m² 8.3 SF

4 m²

97 Riser 8246.7 SF Fertiliser Storage 40 m² 426.5 SF

81 Holding Tanks

442.5 SF 100 Riser 1 m² 8.3 SF

64.7 SF

92 Paper Storage 47 m² 506.2 SF

281 m² 3024.3 SF

74 Working Circulation

82 m² 880.4 SF

89 Water Storage

82 m² 880.4 SF

89 Water Storage

256 m² 2755.2 SF

154 Administration

256 m² 2755.2 SF

158 138 Brewery E_01 Ramp

185 m² 1990.0 SF

21 Delivery Bay

39 m² 421.8 SF

22 Waste Storage

185 m² 1990.0 SF

21 Delivery Bay

39 m² 421.8 SF

22 Waste Storage

149 m² 1600.5 SF

158 Brewery

149 m² 223 m² 1600.5 SF 2398.5 SF

14 m² 151.9 SF

151 Seasonal Growing

223 m² 2398.5 SF

138 E_01 Ramp

14 m² 151.9 SF

151 Seasonal Growing

154 Administration

150 Communal Cooking 150 m² 1614.8 SF

150 m² 1614.8 SF

150 Communal Cooking

59 m² 636.7 SF

159 Bakery

109 m² 1172.0 SF

4 m²

47.8 SF

15 m² 161.3 SF

216 Retail Stairs UP

15 m²

11 m² 118.7 SF

161.3 152SF Elevator

30 Service Elevator

6 m² 68.7 SF

30 Service Elevator

216 Retail Stairs UP

11 m² 118.7 SF

152 Elevator

12 m² 131.2 SF

36 Retail Stairs

12 m²

36 Retail Stairs

118.7 SF

131.232 SF 34 33 Seasonal Growing Elevator Seasonal Growing 4 m² 11 m²

48 4586.5 SF Charity Food Bank

426 m²

35 Freegan Supermarket

109 m² 1172.0 SF

48 Charity Food Bank

59 m² 636.7 SF

159 Bakery

28 Stairs 12 m² 124.1 SF

426 m² 4586.5 SF

26 Brewery

118.7 SF

72 m² 771.3 SF

26 Brewery

24 Brewery 72 m² 771.3 SF

47.8 SF

148 m² 1589.6 SF

24 Brewery

17 m² 180.2 SF

70 Retail Stairs

11 m² 118.7 SF

66 Elevator

6 m² 68.7 SF

64 Freegan Supermarket 89 m² 958.5 SF

64 Freegan Supermarket

6 m² 68.7 SF

65 Service Elevator

87 m² 935.5 SF

60 Brewery

87 m² 935.5 SF

60 Brewery

11 m² 118.7 SF

66 Elevator

17 m² 180.2 SF

70 Retail Stairs

199 m² 2147.0 SF

59 Brewery

65 Service Elevator

32 34 33 Seasonal Growing Elevator Seasonal Growing 4 m² 11 m²

68 Services 38 m² 403.7 SF

69 Aquaponics

38 m² 403.7 SF

68 Services

548 m² 5903.2 SF

4 m² 47.8 SF

47.8 SF 35 Freegan Supermarket

69 m² 747.5 SF

25 Bakery

2369 m² Bakery 747.5 SF 59 m² 630.8 SF

59 m² 630.8 SF

23 Bakery

126 m² 1357.8 SF

67 Aquaponics

548 m² 5903.2 SF

69 Aquaponics

126 m² 1357.8 SF

67 Aquaponics

199 m² 2147.0 SF

59 Brewery

89 m² 958.5 SF

14 m² 151.9 SF

94.8 SF

31.7 SF 162 155 E_02 Stairs E01_Entrance Hall 9 m²

3 m²

27 m² 291.0 SF

164 Elevator 3 m² 165 27.7 SF Greenhouse 6 m² 166 DN Stairs 64.4 SF

27 m² 291.0 SF

164 Elevator 3 m² 165 27.7 SF Greenhouse 6 m² 166 DN Stairs 64.4 SF

419.7 SF

157 161 163 E01_ Stairs 10 m² 160 E02_ Elevator E02_Entrance Hall 102.5 4 m² 18 m² 156SF Aquaponics 197.2 SF 39 m² E01_Elevator 41.4 SF

14 m² 151.9 SF

94.8 SF

31.7 SF 162 155 E_02 Stairs E01_Entrance Hall 9 m²

3 m²

14 m² 151.9 SF

94.9 SF

8 m² 82.4 SF

64.4 SF 27 m² 291.0 SF

37 Elevator 3 m² 38 27.7 SF Greenhouse 6 m² 39 Stairs

27 m² 291.0 SF

37 Elevator 3 m² 38 27.7 SF Greenhouse 6 m² 39 Stairs 64.4 SF

45 Pub

39 m² 418.9 SF

45 Pub 39 m² 418.9 SF

27 m² 291.0 SF

51 Elevator 3 m² 53 27.7 SF Greenhouse 6 m² 54 64.4 Stairs SF

145 m² 1558.4 SF

63 Pub 179 m² 1928.5 SF

27 m² 291.0 SF

51 Elevator 3 m² 53 27.7 SF Greenhouse 6 m² 54 64.4 Stairs SF

145 m² 1558.4 SF

71 Restaurant

62 E_02 Stairs

8 m² 82.4 SF

62 E_02 Stairs

419.7 SF

157 161 163 E01_ Stairs 10 m² 160 E02_ Elevator E02_Entrance Hall 102.5 4 m² 18 m² 156SF Aquaponics 197.2 SF 39 m² E01_Elevator 41.4 SF

133 m² 1432.1 SF

47 Cafe/Restaurant

133 m² 798.8 SF 1432.1 SF

47 E_0127 Ramp Cafe/Restaurant 74 m²

14 m² 151.9 SF

42 43 46 E01_ Stairs 10 m² E02_ Elevator E02_Entrance Hall 102.5 4 m² 18 m² 41SF 197.2 SF E01_Elevator27 41.4 SF 3 m² E_01 Ramp 44 31.7 SF 40 74 m² E_02 Stairs 798.8 SF E01_Entrance Hall 9 m²

9 m²

93.2 57 SF WC

71 Restaurant

31.7 SF 44 40 E_02 Stairs E01_Entrance Hall 9 m²

3 m²

42 43 46 E01_ Stairs 10 m² E02_ Elevator E02_Entrance Hall 102.5 4 m² 18 m² 41SF 197.2 SF E01_Elevator 41.4 SF

3 m²

56 61 E01_Stairs E02_ Elevator 9 m² 4 m² 55SF 97.1 E01_Elevator 40.9 SF

93.2 57 SF WC

9 m²

58 31.7 SF Corridor

15 m² 160.2 SF

3 m²

56 61 E01_Stairs E02_ Elevator 9 m² 4 m² 55SF 97.1 E01_Elevator 40.9 SF 58 31.7 SF Corridor

15 m² 160.2 SF

5/16/2017 3:39:34 AM

137 Elevator 5 m² 56.0 SF

5 m² 56.0 SF

137 Elevator

37 m² 400.9 SF

26 m² 284.4 SF

38 m² 413.6 SF

45 m² 489.5 SF

43 m² 468.2 SF

95 Circulation

244 m² 2629.4 SF

105 Pre- Treatment

5/16/2017 3:39:34 AM

245.2 SF 60 m² 642.8 SF

Room Areas_01 Floor 1 : 200

32.2 SF

117 116 115 00 118 379 377 378 Screening Screening Screening Anerobic Biodigestors Screening Anerobic Biodigestors Anerobic Biodigestors Anerobic Biodigestors 3 m² 6 m² 6 m² 37 m² 6 m² 43 m²

4 m² 47.5 SF

96 Riser 4 m² 47.5 SF

156 m² 1679.2 SF

96 Riser 4 m² 47.5 SF

64.7 SF

44 m² 473.2 SF

66 m² 713.8 SF

123 Bottomash Storage

26 m² 284.4 SF

122 Circulation

66 m² 713.8 SF

128 Bottomash Storage

26 m² 284.4 SF

127 Circulation

First floor

Housing Floor Areas

P46

5/16/2017 3:39:14 AM

245.2 SF

139 Riser 2 m² 23.6 SF

139 Riser

11 m² 117.8 SF

141

141 140 Hotel DNCirculation Elevator 23 m²

2 m² 23.6 SF

11 m² 117.8 SF

149 140 Hotel Circulation 23 m² Bar Salad/Juice Elevator

Room Areas_01 Floor 1 : 200

60 m² 642.8 SF

149 Salad/Juice Bar

36 m² 384.9 SF

10 Hotel entrance

5 m² 53.1 SF

02 Delivery Hall 14 72 72 m² Elevator Riser 779.8 SF

20 Administration 134 m² 1446.0 SF

134 m² 1446.0 SF

20 Administration

5 m² 53.1 SF

72 Elevator

11 39 m² 423.8 SF Riser 1 m² 10.9 SF

17 02 16 15 Riser 49 UP Delivery Hall 14 Riser 3 m² Riser 72 m² Riser Riser 4 m² 35.7 SF 779.8 SF 4 m² 2 m² 4 m² 47.5 SF 0547.5 SF 23.6 SF 47.5 SF Fertiliser Storage 07 39 m² 423.0 SF 50 117 116 115 00 118 379 Entrance 10 m² 377 378 Elevator 10 Screening Screening Screening Anerobic Biodigestors Screening Anerobic Biodigestors 106.2 SF Anerobic Biodigestors Anerobic Biodigestors 11Hotel m² 3 m² 6 m² 6 m² 37 m² 6 m² 43 m² entrance 37 m² 37 m² 06SF 117.8 SF 36 m² 32.2 SF 64.0 64.0 SF 400.9 SF 64.0 SF 465.4 08 SF 400.9 SF Holding Tanks 400.9 SF 384.9 SF Greenhouse 12 17 11 39 m² 42 m² 16 423.8 SF 15 Riser Riser 452.2 SFRiser Riser 4 m² 73 3 m² 13 Riser 01 1 m² 4 m² 47.5 SF Elevator Riser 35.7 SF 10.9 SF 4 m²Circulation 18 UP 47.5 SF 5 m² 3 m² 0547.5 SF 90 m² Riser 967.2 SF 51.3 SF29.3 SF Fertiliser Storage 2 m² 07 39 m² 23.7 SF Entrance 423.0 SF 49 UP Riser

2 m² 23.6 SF

50 Elevator 11 m² 117.8 SF

32 m² 343.6 SF

5 m² 53.0 SF

84 Fuelling Station 52 m² 556.9 SF

38 m² 413.6 SF

44 m² 473.2 SF

91 Metal Storage

66 m² 713.8 SF

123 Bottomash Storage

64.7 SF

109 108 90 113 110 114 111 112 Screening Screening Screening Anerobic Biodigestors Screening Anerobic Biodigestors Anerobic Biodigestors Anerobic Biodigestors 6 m² 6 m² 6 m² 38 m² 6 m² 46 m²

5 m² 53.0 SF

156 m² 1679.2 SF

83 Pre- Treatment

76 Elevator

18 m² 191.4 SF

85 Delivery Hall

83 Pre- Treatment

76 Elevator

18 m² 191.4 SF

85 Delivery Hall

52 m² 556.9 SF

84 Fuelling Station

79 Hotel Circulation

Room Areas_00 Floor 1 1 : 200

10 m² 102.7 SF

60 m² 649.3 SF

106 Feed Storage

5 m² 56.2 SF

126 Elevator

237 m² 2550.8 SF

119 Pre- Treatment

5 m² 56.2 SF

91 Metal Storage

109 108 90 113 110 114 111 112 Screening Screening Screening Anerobic Biodigestors Screening Anerobic Biodigestors Anerobic Biodigestors Anerobic Biodigestors 6 m² 6 m² 6 m² 38 m² 6 m² 46 m²

237 m² 2550.8 SF

119 Pre- Treatment

56.25SF m² 56.2 SF

124 122 Elevator 102 Circulation 5 m² Elevator

32 m² 344.7 SF

127 m² 1371.8 SF

121 Gas Collection

60 m² 649.3 SF

106 Feed Storage

5 m² 56.2 SF

102 Elevator

32 m² 344.7 SF

127 m² 1371.8 SF

130 Gas Collection 64 m² 687.2 SF

124 Elevator

121 Gas Collection

22 m² 241.5 SF

129 Kiln

107 Gas Collection

22 m² 241.5 SF

129 Kiln

107 Gas Collection

77 Elevator

2 m² 20.5 SF

78 Riser

32 m² 343.6 SF

79 Hotel Circulation

10 m² 102.7 SF

77 Elevator

Room Areas_00 Riser Floor 2 m² 20.5 SF 1 : 200

Room Areas_-01 Floor 1 : 200

Room Areas_-02 Floor 1 : 200

131 Kiln 64 m² 688.9 SF

26 m² 284.4 SF

127 Circulation

66 m² 713.8 SF

128 Bottomash Storage

237 m² 2555.0 SF

125 Pre- Treatment

5 m² 56.2 SF

126 Elevator

42 Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document BREWER STREET CAR PARK, SOHO, LONDON W1F 0LA | DESIGN PRINCIPLES DOCUMENT

Checker Checker

Ground floor

1 : 200 Scale Scale

1 : 200 Scale

Author Drawn by

Author

P45 P45 P44 P44

Plan Areas Plan00_01 Areas Plan Areas -02_-01

P46

Drawn by

Checked by

0001 Project number Date

AS Drawn by

Checked by

1705-15

Project number Date

0001 Project number

0001

1705-15 Date

1705-15

Checked by

Checker

Checked by

1 : 200 Scale

Room Areas_-03 Floor 1 : 200

64 m² 687.2 SF

130 Gas Collection

131 Kiln 64 m² 688.9 SF

Wasteminster

Drawn by

Author

Drawn by

Author Drawn by

Checked by

Checker Checked by

Wasteminster Wasteminster

Date

1705-15

Wasteminster

Wasteminster Wastemin

NCP ltd.

Project number

0001

Project number

0001 Project number

Cut out: 1500x1560 Shaft size: 1500x1630

Plan Areas -02_-01

Plan Areas -04_-03

Date

1705-15 Date

Basement floor -2 Basement floor -3 Basement floor -4 Basement floor

Room Areas_-03 Floor 1 Room Areas_-02 Floor 1 1 : 200 1 : 200

Room Areas_-04 Floor 2 1 : 200

Ground Floor Areas

NCP ltd. NCP ltd NCP ltd.

NCP ltd.

Cut out: 1500x1560 Shaft size: 1500x1630 Cut out: 1500x1560 Shaft size: 1500x1630

Description No. Description Date No. Date Description No.

Consultant Consultant Address Address Address Address Phone Phone Fax Fax e-mail e-mail

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

Date Description No. Date

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

Description No.

Consultant Consultant Address Address Address Address Phone Phone Fax Fax e-mail e-mail Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

Date Description No.

Proposed Areas

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

www.autodesk.com/revit www.autodesk.com www.autodesk.com/revit

www.autodesk.com/revit www.autodesk.com/revit

www.autodesk.com/revit

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

5/16/2017 3:39:14 AM

4.0 Design Proposal 58

4.10 PROPOSED AREAS

4.0 Design Proposal

4.11 Proposed Areas

5.0 Structural Report

5.0 Structural Report 5.1 Architectural Intent

Architectural Intent

The proposal is a hybridization of open plan market infrastructure and a self-sustaining, off-grid neighborhood of bio-climatically enclosed properties.

Section

The main structural principles can be divided into three separate elements, a large solid concrete ground and first floor connected by elegant concrete columns at seemingly random spacings, a forest of timber households that utilize standardized timber elements as structural walls and floors whilst acting as screening devices, and a transparent lightweight steel and glass envelope that acts as a climate control device.

Elevation

Section

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

5.0 Structural Report 5.2 Primary Structure

Primary Structure

Base Structure

This page sets out the range in materials and finishes to be used, how the timber is joined and to reiterate that no metal fixings are to be used in the structural joinery of the primary, secondary systems. Post and beam forms of construction tend to use columns and beams joined together with nominally pinned connections using steel plates and metal fasteners. However, with this project only timber to timber connections will be used for the project.

an absorbent applicator. Excess release agent should be mopped up and wiped away as this causes surface dusting and retardation and the removal of the surface skin of concrete on striking of the shutters. An alternative release agent, preferred by the contractor, to be tested on the sample panel along with Chemlease OF, to check for best results. HEATING PIPES Position heating conduits above the polythene and insulation, and within the concrete topping. Support the conduits on concrete spacers to allow a 25mm gap, for the concrete to pass below it. When the heating pipe work has been installed, place the anti-crack mesh for the topping slab supported on continuous wire chairs to create a rigid stable surface on which to walk on. This is important as it will prevent accidental damage or disturbance to pipe work below, during concreting operations.

FORMED CONCRETE FINISHES The specification describes the concrete mix parameters, the workmanship and the assembly of plain smooth concrete walls, columns and slab soffits to ensure a fine consistent, concrete surface finish. The wall, soffit and stairs and landings to have a plain, smooth, matt surface finish. The ponds at and below waterline to have smooth silk like surface finish with a slight sheen. FORMWORK MATERIALS Wall Form Face, Columns, Slab Soffits and Stairs Use 18mm thick MDO Film Faced ply, typically WISA MDO, Pourform 107 MDO, Tulsa Form MDO, Crown 44 and Ultraform MDO for example which all are a good quality FSO grade ply. There are some MDO brands that are not suitable because of their poor dimensional accuracy and tolerance and paper film quality. The proposed MDO sheet will be assessed for quality and integrity of finish by site trials before being approved. Submit MDO sample with technical literature for inspection and acceptance. The face film must not be wrinkled nor heavily marked with mottling, the sheet shall not be bowed nor curled at the ends under prolonged rainfall and must remain stable and flat when laid out and fixed in place.

SURFACE APPEARANCE A hard silky and smooth surface finish, sometimes with a tortoise shell coloration with several passes of the trowel blade, or a very fine tonal coloration like freckled porcelain with a few passes of the trowel blade. The number of passes is determined by floor condition, air temperate and rate of hardening. It is always best to complete an entire room or passageway or areas on the same day to create the same surface coloration. Hand trowelled edges may look lighter in colour with less dark tonal depth. IDIN Architects - Burasiri

SURFACE PROTECTION Lay polythene sheets over the coated surface, the day after. Make sure it is in contact with the surface with no air gaps and all the edges are held down with timbers to avoid them being blown open. Cover the polythene surface with protective cardboard or thick plastic sheets to prevent damage to the concrete while other work is in progress.

CONCRETE SURFACE SEALER Apply one coat, brush applied or spray applied, water- based Facael Oleo This is a non solvent based product suitable for enclosed spaces. Alternatives are Silane or Siloxane based coatings, for example Keim Lotexan, but they are solvent based. SURFACE TOLERANCES AND ACCEPTABLE FINISH The concrete should be assessed for compliance seen from 3metres away or from 1.5m in special locations such as staircase and entrances seen at eye level. The general appearance of a large soffit area seen as whole should look acceptable with only minor surface defects or imperfections. RELEASE AGENT Apply one even film coat of Nufins Chemlease O.F. (odour free) depending on timber absorbency, using the appropriate Nufins spray equipment or 45

Statement of Materials and Finishes

FINAL CLEAN After removing the floor protection towards the end of the contract, lightly polish and clean to redeem the original surface using a single head heavy duty floor cleaner. Immediately after polishing, apply DK surface colour enhancer coat or Nufins Cure Coat Super. Francisco Mangado - Zaragoza Pavilion

5.0 Structural Report 5.3 Structural Principals

Structural Principals Ground Floor Principals The ground floor will be predominately concrete floors and columns, utilizing as reconstituted material from the demolition. The floors have large circular elements that act as light-wells creating focal points for the public. The floor slab and ground floor react to and interact with light, the staggered concrete cast slab helps to transfer the loads towards the enlarged concrete columns. The slab creates the sense of walking through a landscape instead of acting as roof. The staggered slab helps to direct light and mitigate noise from the market.

Concept sketch

Market interior render showing staggered floor slab

Typical housing unit Pond

Planter

150mm staggered concrete floor

1500mm Ă&#x2DC; column

Typical housing slab construction

Worm eye view of Housing slab with column and elevator shaft locations.

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

5.0 Structural Report 5.4 Secondary Structure

Secondary Structure

Structural precedent

Green Oak (primary structure generally) Finish: Untreated External structure will be subjected to the weather but not in permanent contact with the soil and/ or water German Building Technology Institute (DIBt) DIN 68800 standard specifies the use of dark-colored heartwood e.g.. afzelia, ekki, oak, greenheart in these conditions. These types of wood do not require preservative treatment against insects, fungi, leaching or soft rot.

This page sets out the range in section sizes to be used, how the timber is joined and to reiterate that no metal fixings are to be used in the structural joinery of the primary, secondary systems. Post and beam forms of construction tend to use columns and beams joined together with nominally pinned connections using steel plates and metal fasteners. However, with this project only timber to timber connections will be used for the project. TYPES/LENGTHS: The types and lengths of the timbers are determined by access to site, as Farringdons roads are narrow and congested access can only be gained via a standard rigid axel truck with length no longer than 11,7m and a load length of up to 9m.

Tadao Ando - Komyo-ji-Saijo Temple

BEAM/COLUMN TYPES: The design will require two types of beams that of the horizontal beam (A) and beams that are wider than the normally available laminate widths (B) which will need to be manufactured for the different widths side by side and used reversing layers so that there is an overlap and no straight through vertical joint

Douglas Fir (secondary structure generally) Finish: Osmo Natural Oil Woodstain: White 900 Secondary structure requires a wood preservative with test certificate Iv, P, W1 to prevent against insects, fungi, leaching or soft rot. The stain will highlight the naturally strong reddish grain in the timber. This will fade with prolonged exposure to sunlight, turning silver grey color. Douglas Fir (exposed structure to habitable spaces generally) Finish: Osmo Natural Oil Woodstain: White 900 Exposed structure to habitable spaces (internal) to be finished in a light stain to highlight out reddish grain in douglas fir, and a darker stain to the already light beech multiply. In an internal environment Douglas fir requires no preservation treatment. The contractor is required to supply samples of both one and two coats of specified finish on specified materials for Architect sign off prior to work commencing

SIZES: The sizes of beams include: 150,50mm, 50,150mm, 50x50mm The sizes of Columns include: 150,50mm, 200,50mm, Composite 150mm,50mm x 4

Oak (cladding External Finish) Finish: Untreated Exterior of the housing will be subjected to sun degradation but not in permanent contact with the soil and/or water, as with the structure this material will not require preservation treatment.

FINISH: All surfaces are to be fully planed or sanded, and consistent with the structural restrictions of the strength grades. The appearance of the timber must be in line with BS 4169 â&#x20AC;&#x153;Intermediateâ&#x20AC;? Appearance Class. The appearance must also correspond with the appearance of the timber type, exposing and making clear the varieties seen within the building and not covering over all timber so as to look

David Adjaye - Sclera Pavilion

Statement of Materials and Finishes

5.0 Structural Report 5.5 Structural Principals

Proposed Structural Principals

The structure of the households should be completely integral to the design. The walls consist of standardized timber planks. Every element of the internal fit-out will integrate into this structuring device. CARPENTRY JOINTS: A handful of traditional Japanese timber joints have been selected to create the concept for the structural post to beam primary structure, namely: 1. Wedge Table Slice Joint 2. Lapped Gooseneck timber Joint 3. Base timber to stone joint Boards and smaller sections to be rift sawn to display a uniform basic grain pattern on all four sides. Larger hardwood sections to be squared heartwood or quartered squared. Each length to be selected carefully and checked for warping. See specification for acceptable tolerances.

Own drawing

Housing Interior

All green oak to be rough-sawn and untreated, to specialist subcontractor and Structural Engineer confirmation. All Douglas Fir to be planed all round, see finishes section for waxing

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

6.0 Building Services: Environmental Strategy and Sustainability Report

6.0 Building Services 6.1 Environmental Strategy and Sustainability Report

Ecosystem

Contemporary City

Metabolic City

Key Principles

Demonstrating leadership in climate change mitigation, London has implemented targets that go beyond those at national and international level. In October 2011, the Mayor of London published his revised Climate Change Mitigation and Energy (CCME) strategy, entitled ‘Delivering London’s Energy Future’. The strategy focuses on reducing carbon dioxide emissions to mitigate climate change, securing a low carbon energy supply for London, and transforming London into a thriving low carbon capital. The CCME strategy reiterates the Mayor’s target to source 25% of London’s energy supply from decentralized energy sources by 2025. At the national level, through the passing of the Climate Change Act 2008 the UK set legally binding targets to cut its net carbon dioxide emissions to at least 80% lower than the 1990 emissions by 2050, with at least 34% reduction to be achieved by 2020. Further to this, the 2009 Renewable Energy Directive sets the UK a legal commitment to source at least 15% of its energy consumption from renewable sources by 2020, while the 2010 Energy Performance of Buildings Directive requires all new buildings developed from 2021 to be nearly zero energy buildings. Under these agreements the UK government has implemented a series of policies and tools to meet these obligations. With energy at the heart of our major cities’ transformation to sustainable, resilient low carbon communities, the delivery of new energy infrastructure will be critical to securing our energy future. It is in this context that the proposal has been envisioned.

Food

Distributed Local Energy

Goods/Economic Activity

Increased Natural Areas Water INPUTS

OUTPUTS Materials

Water

Recovered goods C0

Waste Biomass

Biomass

Reduced Emissions Heat

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

6.0 Building Services 6.2 Decentralized Energy Policy

Decentralized Energy Policy

Heat remains the single biggest reason we use energy in our society. We use more energy for heating than for transport or the generation of electricity. The vast majority of our heat is produced by burning fossil fuels - around 80% from gas alone - and as a result heat is responsible for around a third of the UKâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s carbon dioxide emissions. This is unsustainable. If London is to play its part in the global effort to combat climate change, we will need our buildings to be virtually zero carbon by 2050. The transformation of our heat generation and heat use will require and create new markets and new opportunities. Heat networks operating as part of a decentralized energy system have the potential to supply market competitive low to zero carbon energy in dense urban areas whilst providing long-term flexibility to accommodate new and emerging heat production technology and energy sources.

6.0 Building Services: Environmental Strategy and Sustainability Report

6.2 POLICY

6.0 Building Services 6.2 Decentralized Energy Policy Table 1: Regional and Local Waste Policy Type 1: Community-scale – CHP plants located in a Type 2: District-scale – Dedicated energy center serving up Type 3: Wider area network – Longer distance network Type 4: Heat captured and transmitted from power stations WASTE POLICY REQUIREMENTS / OBJECTIVES The London Plan The London Plan is the overall strategic plan for London, and it sets building, serving up to 3,000 homes to 20,000 homes on multiple sites linking major heat source(s) to around 100,000 homes outside London. 2011 out a fully integrated economic, environmental, transport and social Mayor’s Municipal London’s Wasted Resource sets out the Mayor’s policies and framework for the development of the capital to 2031. It forms part Waste Management proposals for reducing the amount of municipal waste produced, of the development plan for Greater London. London boroughs’ local Strategy – London’s increasing the amount of waste reused, recycled or composted, and plans need to be in general conformity with the London Plan, and its Wasted Resource generating low carbon energy from remaining waste. policies guide decisions on planning applications by councils and the 2012 Mayor. The Mayor’s key targets are: • Achieve zero municipal waste direct to landfill by 2025; • Reduce the amount of household waste produced from 970kg to 790kg per • household in 2031; Increase London’s capacity to reuse or repair from 6,000 tonnes-ayear to 30,000 by 2031; • Recycle or compost at least 60% by 2031; • Cut greenhouse emissionsTypeby oneSchematic million tonnes by 2031; Generate 2 Network as much energy as possible from organic and non-recyclable waste.

Type 1 Network Schematic

Type 1 Network Profile

Making Business Sense of Waste: The Mayor’s Business Waste Management Strategy 2012

Making Business Sense of Waste tackles London’s increasing problem of business waste, both from the commercial and industrial (C&I) and construction, demolition and excavation (CDE). The Mayor hopes to achieve a 70% reuse, recycling and composting rate of C&I waste by 2020 and a 95% rate of CDE within the same time.

Planning Policy Statement 10 (PPS10) 2005

Planning Policy Statement 10 (PPS10) sets out the Government’s policy to be taken into account by waste planning authorities and Type 2 Network Profile forms part of the national waste management plan for the UK. The statement sets out a suggested national policy framework for waste management to: • Drive waste management up the hierarchy; • Provide sufficient and timely provision for waste management facilities that meet the needs • of their communities; • Ensure the recovery and disposal of waste does not harm human health or the environment; • Ensure waste is disposed of as near as possible to the place of production; • Ensure the concerns and interests of local communities and the needs of the waste • Collection/disposal authorities and business is reflected and encourages competition;

Key Waste Policies from the London plan are as follows: • Moving towards regional self-sufficiency in London, with a long term target of ensuring that facilities with sufficient capacity to manage 85% of waste arising in London are provided by 2020; Type 3 Network Schematic • Minimising the level of waste generated and increasing the re-use Type 4 Network Schematic and recycling and composting on waste; • Safeguarding all existing waste management sites (this has particular relevance in respect of the existing Hendon Waste Transfer facility); • Requiring the provision of suitable waste and recycling storage facilities in all new developments; • Supporting treatment facilities to recover value from residual waste; Type 4 Network Profile • Where waste cannot be dealt with locally, promote waste facilities Type 3 Network Profile that have good access to water or rail transport; • Minimising the amount of energy used in the collection, transfer, movement and management of waste in line with the Mayor’s target of reducing carbon emissions; • Promoting generation of renewable energy and renewable hydrogen; • Minimising transport impacts from collection and transfer and movement of wastes to facilities within and outside London; • Exceeding recycling or composting levels in municipal waste of 35% by 2010; and 45% by 2015; • Achieving recycling or composting levels in commercial and industrial waste of 70% by 2020;

Summary of Barriers to Deployment of Type 3 Schemes

Summary of Barriers to Deployment of Type 4 Schemes

Summary of Barriers to Deployment of Type 2 Schemes

Summary of Barriers to Deployment of Type 1 Schemes

BREWER STREET CAR PARK, SOHO, LONDON W1F 0LA | DESIGN PRINCIPLES DOCUMENT

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

6.0 Building Services 6.3 Decentralized Energy Deployment, Stakeholders and Roles

Timeline for Decentralized Energy Deployment

Decentralized Energy Deployment Stakeholders and Roles

Table Left: shows the inter-relationship between policy, Decentralized Energy scheme deployment, interconnection and transition to low and then zero carbon heat sources. It is important to note that any timeline set out in this context is necessarily general and therefore indicative. Table Right: summarizes key stakeholders and their roles in the Decentralized Energy deployment process. It sets out actions by stakeholders in relation to policy, planning and implementation. The role of the boroughs and the GLA shows the interrelationship between setting strategic policy, overseeing strategic projects and project development at local level.

6.0 Building Services: Environmental Strategy and Sustainability Report 6.3 EXISTING TRANSFER, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF WASTE

6.0 Building Services 6.4 Proposed Building System Overview

System Overview

Distributed Local Energy Food

Waste

Fig. 60:Waste Disposal Routes and Tonnage 2012/2013 Grey Water

Heat Heat

Heat Grey Water Waste Biomass

Instead of incoherent optimizations here or there on waste reduction, it is a better idea to develop a new, integrated perspective in which economy, ecology and spatial diversification are coupled to city, nature and landscape. Each individual household is envisioned as a part of a much larger whole, the inputs and outputs of which connecting to a much larger system within the proposal. This type of thinking and design helps to significantly reduce and re-use energy requirements and waste . Utilizing a combination of passive and active energy conserving and generating materials, and employing built environment methodologies, energy positive and zero-carbon homes can be erected rapidly and at a lower construction cost with less waste. The nature of the materials used and ethos Distributed Local Energy within which the Households are designed allows for them to be quickly assembled and disassembled. Goods/Economic Activity The site has the potential to form the coupling between the Fig. 61:Main Recycling Routes 2012/2013 barbican and Bunhill energy centers, successfully linking the Recovered goods networks together will help to reduce costs and eliminate risks. Energy will be produced on-site from CHP and Waste incineration. The main route through the site is Goswell road. Providing an opportunity to introduce an E-loop bicycle transport network 2 An estimated 15-17% of CO emissions associated with recycling is produced to reduce the amount of freight traffic in London. The main by the transport moving the waste and recycling. source The project aims toheat tackle of secondary is captured from the underground 2 this percentage to gain this percentage back in savings on CO rail system. The .arrival of crossrail will increase developments and need for energy. All brownwater waste is collected and processed on-site, the With the formation of the Localism Act of 2011, Westminster City Council will outputs of which are re-introduced into the overall system. Heat need to take charge of local industry to better deal with their waste tonnage. Rainwater is harvested from the large enclosing roof, stored above each household and utilized for toilets and washing. Currently the commercial food waste collection service a lowis priority of thethrough a series of planting Excessiswater filtered down councils. The Collection of food waste for energy arrangements production commenced and then temporarily stored in the evaporative cooling the groundinfloor entrances. in the spring of 2013 with 650 tonnes of commercial foodponds wasteatcollected

2013/14. (City of Westminster- Waste treatment Strategy 2015-2031). This compared to the 6205 tonnes/year of food waste in the Soho area, clearly shows the increased potential of reuse, redistribution and energy production from this material.

Fig. 62:Smaller Tonnage Recycling Routes 2012/2013

BREWER STREET CAR PARK, SOHO, LONDON W1F 0LA | DESIGN PRINCIPLES DOCUMENT

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

6.0 Building Services 6.5 Proposed Housing Systems Overview

Systems Overview

COMMUNITY FARM

BIOGAS

WATER TREATMENT

10000m2 SURFACE

95% Gas Requirements

66% Energy Requirement

50% CO2 Reduction

88% Non Potable water

PROMOTE BIKES

50% Food Requirements

Each individual household is envisioned as a part of a much larger whole, the inputs and outputs of which connecting to a much larger system within the proposal. This type of thinking and design helps to significantly reduce and re-use energy requirements and waste . Utilizing a combination of passive and active energy conserving and generating materials, and employing built environment methodologies, energy positive and zero-carbon homes can be erected rapidly and at a lower construction cost with less waste. The nature of the materials used and ethos within which the Households are designed allows for them to be quickly assembled and disassembled. All brownwater waste is collected and processed on-site, the outputs of which are re-introduced into the overall system. Rainwater is harvested from the large enclosing roof, stored above each household and utilized for toilets and washing. Excess water is filtered down through a series of planting arrangements and then temporarily stored in the evaporative cooling ponds at the ground floor entrances.

COMMUNAL HEAT HUB

HEATING

2,5 million kcal

109500 L

48,2 bbl

3500 kwh

1500 m3

Food

water

fuel

electricity

gas

COOKING

GEOTHERMAL STORAGE

VENTILATION & COOLING

SOLAR PANELS

ELECTRIC CAR

CAR SHARING

RAINWATER HARVESTING

BIODIGESTER

LANDSCAPE

LIGHTING

ELECTRONICS

HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION (per year)

PERSONAL TRANSPORT

USEABLE WASTE (rough estimate)

TOILET

TAP

OTHER

unknown

export

recycled

RESTAURANT

HOME COOKING

UNUSABLE

waste

energy recovery

6.0 Building Services: Environmental Strategy and Sustainability Report 6.5 BUILDING ARRANGEMENT USING SERVICES

6.0 Building Services 6.6 Proposed Building Energy Overview

Energy Overview

Urban Farming + Rainwater collection

In order to reduce the carbon offset of the building the entire roofscape immediately above the households will be covered in solar arrays. Given the total roof space above the households equates to 2500m2, and the sites geographic location and orientation, it was calculated that the proposal could harvest 302,500kwh per year. 33% of that energy is used to supply the households and 67% is utilized to offset the requirements of the market/retail space below. Due to the open nature and low energy requirements of the proposal it is estimated that the required energy demands for the households could be reduced even further. The Housing is heated by the underground system of Crossrail and Barbican. The current crossrail system has been built with the heat exchanger but currently expels this heat to the outside, Barbican will be retrofitted with heat exchangers once it has been built over. Electricity

Water

Area roof: 2500 m2

Area roof: 8500 m2

1200 solar panels

302,500 kWh

212 households

Avg. Household Water Consumption

36 %

House cleaning + washing machine

24 %

66%

SUM

U C TI O N

64 64 % %

Toilet

PTION

Total Consumption: 3476800L/year Regular households

Solar supplied

Assuming 212 Households

Production: 6676920L/year

Y E A R

0 1200ÂŁ/year

Y E A R

0 8 4000ÂŁ - 1st year Free - 7th year

Heat recovery from Underground tube lines: Radiant heat is captured in the shared garden space before been expelled through the roof. BREWER STREET CAR PARK, SOHO, LONDON W1F 0LA | DESIGN PRINCIPLES DOCUMENT

Sectional perspective: By capturing the residual heat the proposal allows the households to open up to the garden space regardless of the external weather conditions.

Solar arrays: The solar arrays on the roof are more than adequate to provide the energy requirements of each household, excess energy is then utilized in the market below.

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

6.0 Building Services 6.7 Proposed Building Water Overview

Water Overview

The total roof area equates to approximately 8500m2 and is capable of capturing 6700000L of rainwater a year. Traditionally that water would enter straight into the stormwater system, however due to the rising threat of flooding and need to preserve water, it will be captured in storage tanks above the households and slowly filtered down through the planting system of the shared internal garden, the water supports a fish ecosystem whilst providing evaporative cooling for the inhabitants. Eventually ending in the evaporative cooling ponds on the ground floor. From there it can then enter the city storm-water system. Rainwater harvesting above every household

The harvested water will provide most of if not all the greywater requirements for the proposal (toilet, household cleaning) Potable water will still need to be sourced from traditional means, however the dis-used underground station provides the perfect opportunity to integrate an on-site water treatment plant. The water pools are an essential part of the cooling of the entire building. Saving valuable energy resources. Electricity

Water

Area roof: 2500 m2

Area roof: 8500 m2

1200 solar panels

302,500 kWh

212 households

Avg. Household Water Consumption

Harvested rainwater is utilized in a private garden, filtering rainwater before it enters the fish ponds. 36 %

House cleaning + washing machine

SUM

U C TI O N

64 64 % %

24 %

66%

Toilet

PTION

Total Consumption: 3476800L/year Regular households

Solar supplied

Assuming 212 Households

Production: 6676920L/year Rainwater Harvesting

Pools of water meet the kitchen sink in a symbiotic cleaning and fish feeding process. Y E A R

0 1200ÂŁ/year

Y E A R

0 8 4000ÂŁ - 1st year Free - 7th year

6.0 Building Services: Environmental Strategy and Sustainability Report 6.7 WEATHER LINE AND BREEAM

6.0 Building Services 6.8 Proposed Building Biota Overview

Biota Overview Moisture Retention

Soil Improvement

Pest Prevention

Leaching Prevention

Phyto Filter Biorestauration

Water Absorption

Different planting utilized throughout the proposal in accordance with sun path and purpose (with regards to Filtration etc)

(00)001 Existing Third Floor Plan 1:200 @ A1 --

Fig. 63:Annual Crop Cycle and rotation

Extent of planted landscape: Entire Building is envisioned as a planted landscape immersing the inhabitants in an internal garden paradise.

The size and shape of the planting help to form and shape the architecture BREWER STREET CAR PARK, SOHO, LONDON W1F 0LA | DESIGN PRINCIPLES DOCUMENT

Fig. 64:Urban Agriculture in an office environment

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

e e:

The planting and natural Biota is as important if not more important than the architecture itself and plays a fundamental role in the physical and mental wellbeing of the proposal and its inhabitants. Here the planting is seen as a crucial element of the climatic conditioning, solar shading, water filtration and retention, whilst expanding on the notion of biophilic architecture and the proven psychological benefits nature has on the human psyche.

Protection against Soil Erosion

le: v:

7.0 Construction Management Plan

7.0 Construction Management Plan 7.1 Introduction

Introduction

A Construction Management Plan has been created which addresses salient issues that might arise during the construction phase of the project and how these will be managed on site so as to mitigate the impact to adjoining owners, businesses, residents and the wider public who will be in the immediate vicinity of the works whilst they are being undertaken.

Phase 1: Ground slab is poured with landscaped elements and lightwells in place. Barbican Station is covered. New exits for Crossrail and Barbican Station created.

Phase 2: Concrete Column and First floor slab created. New connections to existing grade 2 listed buildings created. New sky bridge Connection to Barbican Centre. Lightwells created.

MASTERPLAN OF PHASING The project is split into four major construction phases. • Phase 1: Ground slab is poured with landscaped elements and lightwells in place. Barbican Station is covered. New exits for Crossrail and Barbican Station. • Phase 2: Concrete Column and First floor slab created. New connections to existing grade 2 listed buildings created. Sky bridge Connection to Barbican Centre. Lightwells created. • Phase 3: Ceiling and sid facade added to upper level. Allowing for a dry work environment within. Roof to be temporarily supported until wooden housing units added. • Phase 4: Internal Fit-out of Market below and Housing units above. Temporary support structure for roof removed being replaced by new timber housing units

After Phase 2 services to underground stations can resume. Phase 3 encloses the entire site allowing for construction of internal fit-out to occur in any weather conditions. Reducing time and risk of construction.

Phase 3: Ceiling and sid facade added to upper level. Allowing for a dry work environment within. Roof to be temporarily supported until wooden housing units added.

Phase 4: Internal Fit-out of Market below and Housing units above. Temporary support structure for roof removed being replaced by new timber housing units.

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

7.0 Construction Management Plan 7.2 Important Issues

Important Issues

CONTROLLING TRAFFIC AT PEAK HOURS Construction traffic will be programmed so as to avoid school drop off and pickup. Large deliveries will also be programmed to avoid lunch hour rush between 13:00 and 14:30 hrs. A delivery plan will be produced by the contractor to ensure that deliveries arrive at the correct part of site at the correct time. Instructions explaining such a plan will be sent to all suppliers and contractors. Where possible, the site will operate a just in time methodology to avoid bulky materials being stored on site an causing traffic issues. LOGISTICS Swept Path Analysis will be undertaken to determine appropriate vehicle sizes. At this stage calculations have made use of a 3-fixed axel 12m truck. If possible, a micropile drilling rig will be used so as to avoid large and loud machinery being used for substructure works. Other design considerations include the use of shorter span items to be delivered to site i.e. 9m and below. This will negate the need for long articulated lorries moving through Farringdon. HIGHWAYS CONSIDERATIONS There is no parking adjacent to the site. Principal access to the site is from Goswell Road. The site access will remain from Goswell Road for large deliveries. It is intended that the remainder of the site will be accessible from Long Lane and Charter house street and used by contractor vehicle parking and smaller deliveries where possible. Lindsey street will be temporarily closed in order to provide a goods drop-off and site office location. LAYOFF SPACES Lindsey street will be temporarily closed in order to provide a goods drop-off and site office location. With Sub contractors and smaller vehicles accessing the site via the Charter House Street. During Phase 2 the layoff space for larger vehicles will be off of Long Lane within the site boundary with additional loading areas on the corner of Long Lane and Goswell Road which will be restricted to public access.

NOISE Construction noise will be monitored for the duration of the works, until such time that the permanent cladding is completed. Monitoring will be located as per agreement with City Council. This location is expected to be representative of noise impacts at each of the site boundaries due to the proposed activities and the development footprint. Vibration will be monitored continuously through the works as piling activities are planned. There will be boundary monitoring units installed as agreement with City Council, which will continuously monitor noise and vibration levels.

7.0 Construction Management Plan 7.3 Suspension of Existing Public Utilities

Suspension of Existing Public Utilities

This section demonstrates how the impact of the projects activities will be managed / mitigated in relation to vulnerable road users. The pedestrian walk way surrounding site will be underneath a scaffold tunnel. Ensuring no member of the public will be injured when walking the perimeter of site, this scaffold walkway leads to a pelican crossing from what will be the station entrance on Long Lane to Charterhouse Street as requested by the City of London. The use of the adjacent Smithfield’s market is acknowledged, with customers mainly attending the facility between the hours of 21:00 and 07:00. This high frequency shouldn’t effect site works, however the market is still operational until 0800 and Smithfield’s will still receive visitors throughout the day. To combat a pit lane is created which allows the vehicles to park and pass on Lindsey Street. The refuse storage and collection facilities have been agreed with the City’s Waste and Amenity Planning Manager. L.B. Islington queried the lorry movement forecasts both in the construction and operational stages. These will be subject to further examination when a construction management plan and more detailed transport analysis information would be the subject of conditions. The increase in both pedestrian and vehicular activity generated by the new station is acknowledged by Crossrail. This increased activity would be addressed by a programme of local street enhancement and highway works surrounding the site which is currently being developed by Crossrail and the City’s Environmental Enhancement Team.

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

7.0 Construction Management Plan 7.4 Temporary Works

Site Establishment and Welfare

The site establishment and welfare strategy will evolve during the time-frame of the development, however the following principles should be adhered to regardless of the stage of the construction works: • The site will be secured with adequate hoarding and barriers as required during each stage of the works. • A 2400mm high timber hoarding will be erected along the site boundary with the existing highway and this will be adequately lit, maintained and adapted during the contract to suit the phasing of the works. • Access into the site will be controlled via dedicated access and egress points into the site that will be manned by site security operatives at all times. An identification swipe card system will be utilized to allow operatives and visitors to gain access to and from the site. • The site welfare and office location is to be contained within the footprint of the site. Possibly to locate within retained buildings across from charterhouse square. TFL to confirm. • As the project develops the location of the site welfare and offices is likely to evolve and could potentially migrate Under the completed floor slab. • Safe pedestrian routes will be provided within the site between the temporary accommodation and the site working areas. • Flood lighting in areas adjacent to sensitive receptors (i.e. nearby retail and residential properties) will generally be limited to the working hours. Additionally, site lighting will be kept to a minimum taking into account the needs of site health, safety and security, although safety lighting will be retained during non-working hours as required to make the site safe. • All pedestrian and vehicular gates will be maintained by security officers during working hours.

Prior to commencement on site, notification will be given to the following parties to obtain the relevant permissions required for the proposed welfare and logistics strategy:

• City of London regarding Highways, footpaths, scaffold • • • •

and hoarding; Local Police; Adjoining neighbors; City of London Environmental Health Officer; Public Utilities Companies, with regard to the disconnection of existing services and commissioning of the necessary temporary supplies;

Site Hoarding

7.0 Construction Management Plan 7.3 TEMPORARY WORKS

7.0 Construction Management Plan 7.3 Crane Logistics

SITE ESTABLISHMENT AND WELFARE The site establishment and welfare strategy will evolve during the timeframe of the development, however the following principles should be adhered to regardless of the stage of the construction works: • The site will be secured with adequate hoarding and barriers as required during each stage of the works. • A 2400mm high timber hoarding will be erected along the site boundary with the existing highway and this will be adequately lit, maintained and adapted during the contract to suit the phasing of the works. • Access into the site will be controlled via dedicated access and egress points into the site that will be manned by site security operatives at all times. An identification swipe card system will be utilised to allow operatives and Park at 18m visitors to gain access to and from the site.

working areas.

Crane Logistics

• Flood lighting in areas adjacent to sensitive receptors (i.e. nearby retail and residential properties) will generally be limited to the working hours. Additionally, site lighting will be kept to a minimum taking into account the needs of site health, safety and security, although safety lighting will be retained during non-working hours as required to make the site safe.

This section identifies the management of all lifting activities on the project. This is not intended to replace the strategic lift plan but to complement it and be used by those who may not have the need or a strategic lift may plan i.e. housing fit out.

• All pedestrian and vehicular gates will be maintained by security officers during working hours. • Prior to commencement on site, notification will be given to the following parties to obtain the relevant Park at 18m permissions required for the proposed welfare and 6.0te t0 25m logistics strategy: • Westminster City Council (WCC) regarding Highways, 3.7te t0 40m at 18mhoarding; footpaths, scaffold Park and

6.0te t0 25m

• The site welfare and office location is to be contained 3.7te t0 40m within the footprint of the site, however there may be the opportunity to locate office and welfare facilities on 2.0te t0 50m a gantry structure to either Peter Street, Ingestre Place Indicative crane layout and/or Brewer Street. The potential for this would need to be discussed with WCC. In addition there may be the opportunity to locate the site project offices within the retained building to the back of the site for Phase 1 and within Phase 1 building for Phase 2 subject to agreement with the client.

• Allocation of hook time (weekly meeting): The crane

• •

•

2.0te t0 50m

• Local Police;

6.0te t0 25m

3.7te t0 40m • Adjoining neighbours;

• WCC Environmental 2.0te t0 50mHealth Officer;

•

• Public Utilities Companies, with regard to the disconnection of existing services and commissioning of the necessary temporary supplies;

•

allocation will occur with a weekly meeting, with both the crane supervisor and Logistics Company. Prior to attending the meeting all lift plans should be in place for the lift, and co-ordination with deliveries will be essential to avoid materials ‘cluttering’ the site. Mobile cranes: Are not planned to be used on the site however will be reviewed for the erection of the tower crane and the installation of roof level. Tower cranes: There will be one tower crane sited on Lindsey Street. The second Crane will be at the corner of Goswell Road and Long Lane. The third in between the two if necessary. To be confirmed by contractor. Lifting plan: For every lifting operation a lifting plan will be required. There will be a schedule of generic lifts, however all lifts outside of these will need a specific lift plan. All lift plans will need to be approved by the crane coordinator and another mace personnel. Unloading areas will be managed by the banksman and Logistics Team located in the areas of the Pit Lane Oversailing – There is no need for an agreement to Oversail any adjacent properties as the Crane proposed will be locked off at a radius of some 6 to 10 meters which is within the confines of the existing boundary. Hoisting – The current proposal is to locate the hoist on the Charterhouse Street elevation at ground level and from there service all levels up to and including the roof.

• As the project develops the location of the site welfare and offices is likely to evolve and could potentially migrate into one of the newly formed buildings and / or the newly formed basements areas in the later stages of the development. • Safe pedestrian routes will be provided within the site between the temporary accommodation and the site

BREWER STREET CAR PARK, SOHO, LONDON W1F 0LA | DESIGN PRINCIPLES DOCUMENT

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

8.0 CDMC Principle Designer/Risk Report

8.0 Designer Risk Report 8.1 Construction Environmental Management Plan

Construction Environmental Managment Plan

This core document has been prepared in relation to condition 2 of planning permission 13/00605/FULEIA and defines the procedures for achieving the objectives set out in the Company Environmental Policy and any identified environmental performance targets for the project. This document also incorporates details of the community liaison strategy for the project as per City of London Construction Code of Practice. The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) provides the framework for which commitments made in an Environmental Statement or any requirements of planning conditions or Section 106 agreements can be realized. It outlines the approach to environmental management throughout the construction phases with the primary aim of reducing any adverse impacts from construction on the environment and improving the overall environmental performance of Mace. This document provides the scheme for protecting nearby residents and commercial occupiers from noise, dust and other environmental effects in relation to condition 2 of planning permission 13/00605/FULEIA. Planning conditions for the site requires such a scheme be submitted and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to any construction work taking place on the site. The scheme shall be based on the City Council Code of Practice for Construction Sites (‘the Code of Practice’) and arrangements for liaison. ENERGY Following the Completion Date but prior to Occupation the Owner shall confirm that the Energy Statement has been implemented or shall undertake and submit to the City Corporation an assessment of the carbon dioxide emissions of the completed Development so as to calculate the reduction in the amount of carbon dioxide (expressed in tonnes) which reflects the Development’s annual carbon

dioxide emissions which it is calculated will be achieved by the implementation of carbon reduction measures. CYCLE RACKS Before the first occupation of the building a minimum of 150 permanently installed pedal cycle racks shall be provided and then maintained on site throughout the lifetime of the building. The on site provision shall remain ancillary to the use of the building and must be for the sole use of the occupiers of the building and their visitors without charge to the individual end users. HOARDING/ The hoarding will be of a minimal height of 2.44M in height and will be from plywood suitable for lasting the 90 week duration. Guideline for the timber to be used can be identified in the City of London CoCP document.The hoarding will have safety lighting which will have activated half an hour after sunset and half an hour before sunrise. There will also be lighting on the road site to illuminate the baulk kicker (painted in red and white). Gates (although not shown on the images), will open into the site and suitably sized to allow for access of equipment and deliveries. The hoarding will be white in colour, the hoarding will also have a display / contact board for the relevant health and safety signage, there will also be an updated information newsletter that will be displayed on the hoarding notice board and posted to the locals highlighting progress to date and future upcoming works. The contact board will also have the contact details of those in charge and out of hours contact. WASTE AND MATERIALS Waste minimisation methods will be utilised, however any ‘waste’ materials generated will be re-used or recycled

where possible. Reuse will occur within the project where possible, but beneficial reuse of materials on other projects will also be considered. A separate Site Waste Management Plan (SWMP) in BRE Smartwaste format shall be developed and maintained for the VBR project. This plan shall have precedence with regards to waste management activities and will be produced and updated a minimum every 6 months by the Environmental Champion in conjunction with the Environment Manager. The plan has been produced in accordance with the Site Waste Management Plans Regulations 2008 with the Non-Statutory Guidance for Site Waste Management Plans prepared by DEFRA in April 2008. Prior to the start of works, opportunities to adopt the waste minimisation methods will be reviewed with the construction team to assist in meeting or exceeding the project KPIs. In addition opportunities for procuring materials that can be taken back by the supplier or reused elsewhere, have a low carbon footprint or have environmental beneficial aspects. In addition the Plan will seek to identify opportunities to implement the waste minimisation methodology and avoid waste to landfill. It will outline how to manage demolition/construction wastes generated at the worksites, so far as reasonably practicable, in accordance with the national waste hierarchy and within the relevant regulatory controls and cost restraints WASTE MANAGEMENT CONTROLS The following waste will be segregated: • Hazardous (any waste which contains high levels of chemicals, identified in testing process) • General uncontaminated construction and demolition waste Due to site space constraints waste will be collected under a ‘wait and load scenario’ and segregated offsite.

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

8.0 Designer Risk Report 8.1 Construction Environmental Management Plan

210L bins will be located on each floor of the site and collected on the allocated day. No hazardous material will be generated following the removal of asbestos and the oil tank located in the basement of the site. All gypsum will be separated from general waste and disposed of in accordance with legislation. Where practicable other waste types shall be segregated, such as metals and clean timber. The following measures will be taken to avoid disposal of materials: • storage in an appropriately dedicated area to prevent spoilage, damage and contamination • training to construction team on the importance of correct ordering of materials so as to avoid excess materials • review packaging requirements where possible to avoid, reduce and reuse offsite manufacturing NOISE, DUST AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS Development shall not commence until a scheme for protecting nearby residents and commercial occupiers from noise, dust and other environmental effects during construction works has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The scheme shall be based on the Code of Practice for Deconstruction and Construction Sites adopted by the Council. Construction work shall be carried out in accordance with the approved scheme. Construction noise will be monitored for the duration of the works, until such time that the permanent cladding is completed. Monitoring will be located as per agreement with City Council. This location is expected to be representative of noise impacts at each of the site boundaries due to the proposed activities and the development footprint. Vibration will be monitored continuously through the works as piling activities are planned under the Mace remit. There will be boundary monitoring units installed as agreement with City Council.

The following precautions will be made to minimise nuisance to the public and neighbouring occupiers caused by noise. • Noise shall be reduced by the use of silencing devices at all times and noisy operations shall be in accordance with the Party Wall Agreement and Local Authority requirements. • All loading, unloading and deliveries of materials and plant to the site and removal of waste should, where possible, be carried out within normal site working hours. • Utilisation of the right machine for the right job ensuring that plant is not under-powered to carry out the task and hence, generating more noise or more vibration than necessary. • Use of modern intrinsically compliant plant and equipment ensuring noise and vibration levels are minimised at the outset (all equipment must comply with the EC Directives and UK Regulations set out in BS 5228-1 :2009); • Use of physical barriers (of at least 5 kg/m2 surface density), for example, hoarding, monoflex covering on scaffold to reduce noise emissions • Siting of stationary plant and loading/unloading areas away from site boundaries and/ or within screened areas; • Using electrically powered equipment run from the mains supply where available is preferred to using generators to power plant and equipment • Use of screws and drills rather than nails for fixing hoardings etc; • Careful handling of materials & waste such as lowering rather than dropping items; • Avoidance of unnecessary noise (such as engines idling between operations, shouting, loud radios or excessive revving of engines) by effective site management. • Pre and post task reviews of working practices and ensuring noise risk is addressed and reduced to acceptable levels

PESTS The control of pests in and around the site is a key responsibility of the contractor when planning works and caring for the workforce and neighbours. The crucial factor in pest management is investing in prevention and restricting the opportunities for pests such rats and mice to thrive. This should be achievable by eliminating food sources and nesting sites which can be achieved through good housekeeping and management. The site is currently undergoing a period of demolition and clearance, which should drive resident rodents and other pests from site prior to the commencement of the main works, meaning the task of control should provide Mace with an opportunity to instigate control measures from a positon of strength. Therefore the control of pests will rely on Mace undertaking prevention measures by addressing the issues in the following way: • Careful control of food supplies and waste from the canteen, by disposal of waste in to secure food waste bins with securely fitted lockable lids, and the secure storage of unused food stocks; • The prohibition of eating and preparation of food anywhere on site, except the canteen where waste can be controlled, collected and disposed of; • Regular inspection and cleaning of all mess areas and zones outside welfare areas where food scraps can be inadvertently of deliberated disposed of (such as fruit peel and cores); • Spaces under cabins and stores to be sealed to prevent rodents nesting; • Regular inspection of the hoarding perimeter to remove food waste discarded over the hoarding by the general public; • Setting of bait stations to vulnerable areas; • The long term storage of materials which are vulnerable to nesting, such as insulation to be prevented and stored off the ground.

8.0 Designer Risk Report 8.2 Site Environmental Risks and Opportunities

Site Environmental Risks and Opportunities

It is a requirement of the company management system to identify the environmental risks of the works to be undertaken. Each of these identified activities are then assessed as to their significance. A site specific risk assessment has been produced. Planning for responding to incidents and emergencies is an important part of project environmental management. Emergency response and contingency plans will take account of the location of the local drainage system; requirement to engage with the emergency services, location and contents of spill kits, notification process and emergency contacts list in the event of an incident etc.

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

8.0 Designer Risk Report 8.3 Risk Report

8.0 CDMC Principle Designer/Risk Report 8.1 RISK REPORT CONT.

8.0 Designer Risk Report 8.3 Risk report

Designer Hazard Register. Name of Project: Wasteminster

www.veritas-consulting.co.uk Date: 05/15/17

Issue: Revision --

Item

Date Added

4.3

15/05/17

Demolition

5.1

Feature, element, structure, 'process', or activity

Foreseeable Hazards (Persons at Risk)

Distribution: Design Team

Design input to Eliminate or Reduce Hazards and/or Design Assumptions

Ownership

Residual Risk

Information to be Provided to Manage Risk (to Whom)

Close-out Evidence

Close-out Date

Substructure failure

Contracted workers.

Reinforcement of existing structures. Secant piling of sufficient dimensions as per engineers drawings.

Contractor

L/L

Construction drawings (to contractor)

TBC

15/05/17

Collapsing of existing structures when perfroming cut and carve on Building A

Contracted workers

Using a cut and carve demolition method following health and safety regulations

Contractor

L/L

Demolition plans to be provided to contractor.

TBC

5.2

15/05/17

Damage to neighbouring buildings For both building A and B

Neighbouring owners

Raising of braising elements and vertical protection blankets between existing properties. Sensitive sections of the existing building will be demolished by small plant. Wire cutting to isolate retained and demolished structures

Contractor

M/L

Instructions included in Construction management plan. To building contractor.

TBC

5.3

15/05/17

Damage to existing and listed elements on site. See point 2.2.

Damage to Heritage status elements

Hoarding and protection of the existing elements in line with the details provided and Construction managment plan,

Contractor

H/H

e details provided and Construction managment plan

TBC

5.4

15/05/17

Collapsing of existing strctures when demolishing building B

Contracted workers

Using a top-down demolition method following health and safety regulations Contractor

L/L

Demolition plans to be provided to contractor.

TBC

Drawings to be developed in collaboration with supplier.

Contractor

M/M

Clear specification of services and instructions to be provided by manufacturer to contractor and subcontractors Clear specification of services and instructions to be provided by manufacturer to contractor and subcontractors

TBC

Services (Note: can be broken down to separate Mechanical and electrical)

6.1

15/05/17

Incorrect installation of waste to energy services.

6.2

15/05/17

Incorrect installation of gas services Client. within the building

Drawings to be developed in collaboration with supplier.

Contractor

M/M

6.3

15/05/17

Incorrect installation of water services within the building

Client.

Drawings to be developed in collaboration with supplier.

Contractor

M/M

Clear specification of services and instructions to be provided by manufacturer to contractor and subcontractors

TBC

6.4

15/05/17

Incorrect installation of electrical services within the building

Client.

Drawings to be developed in collaboration with supplier.

Contractor

M/M

TBC

6.5

15/05/17

Incorrect installation of Ventilation services within the building

Client.

Drawings to be developed in collaboration with supplier.

Contractor

M/M

TBC

Materials and processes - include manual handling and COSHH issues

7.1

15/05/17

Failure of cast in situ elements due to plastic cracking caused by excessive bleeding

Contracted workers

Specifications to be followed rigorously and all work to comply with BS 8500- Contractor 2 and BS EN 206

M/M

Detailed drawings and spec. to be given to contractor

TBC

7.2

15/05/17

Treatments to Waste-energy equipment with potentially COSHH

Contracted workers

Contractor

Specifications. To suppier and contractor.

TBC

Client./Soho

Guidance and actions for maintenance

BREWER STREET CAR PARK, SOHO, LONDON W1F 0LA | DESIGN PRINCIPLES DOCUMENT

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

8.0 Designer Risk Report 8.3 Risk Report

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

9.0 Lifecycle building maintenance

9.0 Lifecycle Building Maintenance 9.1 Proposed Lifespan

Introduction

INTRODUCTION Within this chapter the buildings maintenance strategy and proposed lifespan will be detailed out. GENERAL Due to the buildingâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s multiple uses combined with the design concept and design strategy the maintenance of the site is hugely important. The life-span of the building is 70 years for the concrete base and 30 years for the Housing above. Due to the heavy traffic that the building will experience both publicly and privately there will need to be a thorough and effective maintenance strategy for both its continued running, efficiency in output. The biggest risk here is that a Timber structure is usually recommended to have a life span of 30 years. This combined with the heavy use of mechanical services and future changing technologies means the buildings internal working must be able to adapt and be replaced, done away with or changed completely while maintaining a structural frame and housing for all the programs inside to carry on being used. The following chapter will look at four major elements within the building maintenance lifecycle. 1. Timber superstructure, 2. Listed building refurbishment, 3. Facade; and 4. Services.

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

9.0 Lifecycle Building Maintenance 9.2 Overview

Ground Floor, Columns, Elevator Shafts

Housing Floor

Majority of damage to in-situ concrete comes from the exposure of reinforcement to the elements. Ensuring adequate cover to rebar during construction should minimize need for repairs. The nature of the enclosed development will negate the majority of damage incurred, extending the lifecycle and maintenance of the in-situ concrete. Should damage occur from impact etc. then a specialist concrete repair contractor should be called to carry out work. It will be important to keep a supply of the pigment, cement and aggregate used to prevent color variation

Majority of damage to in-situ concrete comes from the exposure of reinforcement to the elements. Ensuring adequate cover to rebar during construction should minimize need for repairs. The nature of the enclosed development will negate the majority of damage incurred, extending the lifecycle and maintenance of the in-situ concrete. Should damage occur from impact etc. Then a specialist concrete repair contractor should be called to carry out work. It will be important to keep a supply of the pigment, cement and aggregate used to prevent color variation in repair.

The structural cores and risers are designed to last a minimum of 100 years. However, lift technology has a lifespan in the range of 25-50 years and could need to be replaced sooner.

9.0 Lifecycle building maintenance 9.2 BUILDING MAINTENANCE

9.0 Lifecycle Building Maintenance 9.2 Overview

Market, Retail Edge (S1) 1.A Timber Superstructure 1

BF BE

6000

7000

Timber Housing 1.B Timber Superstructure (S2)

www.autodesk.com/revit

7000

6000

7000

www.autodesk.com/revit

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

BF BE

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

7000

BD-

S3 -

No.

Description

Date

No.

BC S1

Description

Date

1899

BB S1

S1 S2

S3 S2

S3 UP

S2 S3

S1 S2

S3 S2

S3 UP

S3 S3

NCP ltd. Wasteminster

Wasteminster

3rd Floor Plan TImber maintenance

Project number

NCP ltd.

Date Drawn by

0001 1706-12 Author

Project number

Date Drawn by

0001 1706-12 Author

Checked by

Scale

BREWER STREET CAR PARK, SOHO, LONDON W1F 0LA | DESIGN PRINCIPLES DOCUMENT

Checked by

Scale

6/12/2017 12:04:05 AM

For service class 1 (internal and heated areas) GL28H/GL32H European Whitewood are supplied with a Checker All timber shall be regularly inspected for signs of decay. It is common for LarchChecker and Douglas Fir to P74 P74 clean planed finish, visible quality with a single coat of clear preservative and single coat of clear stain, silver out and grey. During this time surface cracking may occur especially on south facing facade that 1 : 100 1 : 100 For service class 1 (internal and heated areas) GL28H/GL32H European Whitewood For service class 2 (external but covered, not exposed to direct wetting) GL28H/GL32H brush applied. are not protected from UV. This does not structurally compromise the timber, however, where fungus/ areservice supplied with a clean planed finish, quality withwetting) a singleGL28H/GL32H coat of clear European European Whitewood supplied a clean finish, be visible quality single For class 2 (external but covered, notvisible exposed to direct decay iswith identified the planed causes should remedied aswith soonaas possible. Due to External timber having a preservative and single clear fistain, and single clear applied. Maintenance Whitewood supplied with a coat cleanofplaned nish, brush visible applied. quality with a single coat of clear preservative coat and of clear preservative shorter lifespancoat thanofS1 and stain, S2 thebrush detail design has incorporated a release mechanism of the external single coat of clear stain, brush applied. Maintenance regime required. facing superstructure, allowing it after its lifespan to be removed and replaced whilst necessary structural regime required. propping takes place. The lifespan of which with a methodical maintenance strategy can be 6/12/2017 12:04:05 AM

100

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

9.0 Lifecycle Building Maintenance 9.2 Overview

External Envelope

Envelope Servicing

The proposed Development is designed to be fully accessible for cleaning and maintenance purposes. Preliminary advice has been sought from Fly Service Engineering and a full strategy will be developed at the next stage.

The BMU jibs will be a 3 stage telescopic design allowing the jib to be as compact as is practicable in the parked position and to also allow a suitable minimum reach. The jib will be approximately 23,000mm long when fully extended and will be capable of slewing the cradle over the mechanical plant and parapet.

General: The strategy predominantly uses rope access cleaning with 2 specialized building maintenance units (BMU) one for the Exterior Facade and the second for on the roof fixed, fully counterweighted, telescopic building maintenance units with a large reach.

The suspended cradle can only ascend and descend in vertical lines. Unless the suspended cradle is situated at and engaging the limit switches on the jib head the jib arm cannot be slewed or extended. The BMU design has been based on the contractorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s drawings above. Please note that the dimensions provided above are not project specific.

102

9.0 Lifecycle building maintenance 9.2 BUILDING MAINTENANCE

9.0 Lifecycle Building Maintenance 9.2 Overview

Services, Heat Capture 3. Proposed Unitised facade and Generation

3.A Proposed Unitised facade

Image 4 – Example Contractors BMU Elevation

arm cannot be slewed or extended. The BMU design has been based on the contractor’s drawings above. Please note that the dimensions provided above are not project specific

The strategy predominantly uses rope access cleaning with 2 specialised building maintenance units (BMU) one for the top of the hotel and the second for on the roof of the energy plant (building B) fixed, fully counterweighted, telescopic building maintenance units with a large reach. Building B Tower – Maximum Reach 23,000mm / Minimum Reach 5,000mm Building B – Maximum Reach 23,000mm / Minimum Reach 5,000mm The BMU jibs will be a 3 stage telescopic design allowing the jib to be as compact as is practicable in the parked position and to also allow a suitable minimum reach. The jib will be approximately 23,000mm long when fully extended and will be capable of slewing the cradle over the mechanical plant and parapet. The suspended cradle can only ascend and descend in vertical lines. Unless the suspended cradle is situated at and engaging the limit switches on the jib head the jib

BREWER STREET CAR PARK, SOHO, LONDON W1F 0LA | DESIGN PRINCIPLES DOCUMENT

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

10.0 Building Control Report

10.0 Building Control Report 10.1 Building Regulations

Building Regulations Introduction

The following chapter will touch on the importance of all the building regulations and certain strategies within the proposal. However, a more detailed report will follow. This chapter will concentrate on a particular series of the regulations that are especially relevant to the modified design proposal. PART A- STRUCTURE The construction and use of timber structure is to pay particular attention to Eurocode 5: Design of Timber structures as well as BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008 Eurocode 5. Housing floor with water ponds

PART B- FIRE SAFETY The building contains a range of programmatic uses and so areas will be fire protected using different methods. Due to the market containing high servicing in the form of open flames the highest risk for fire is within this area. Design moves have been made to comply with regulations, resist the spread of fire and smoke and the consequential danger to people in and around the building. â&#x20AC;˘ Two single water supplies will be used, one connected to the municipal Thames water supply and the other an internal system from rainwater harvesting. Both make use of a pump action system in line with BS5306-2 clause 17.4.1.5. â&#x20AC;˘ Both the Market and Housing are separated physically through an in-situ concrete floor containing water ponds. â&#x20AC;˘ All structural timber has been designed to allow for charring allowing for a structural fire rating of 120min.

Ground Floor Market + Context Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

10.0 Building Control Report 10.2 Building Control Report

Building Control Regulations Compliance

The Approved Documents or ‘Parts’ contain general guidance on the performance expected in order to comply with the building regulations. In order to mitigate some risk, the early engagement with an Approved Inspector would be recommended. The following are key principles and design influences that respond to the different ‘Parts’.

Approved Document E — Resistance to the passage of sound The different nature of activities in the building require particular consideration for acoustic insulation. In specific, The primary Concrete slab should be designed with robust details to prevent the passage of sound from one environment to another.

Further consideration has been made to the historic status of the existing retained buildings. As the site exists in a conservation area and contains listed buildings.

Approved Document F — Ventilation Due to the increasing complexity of the Regulations, ventilation strategies and system design should be considered at the early stages of the design. The building has been designed to have “Whole Building” ventilation, providing fresh air to dilute and disperse low levels of water vapor and other pollutants, by the provision of mechanical supply ventilation, Natural ventilation should take precedent, The entire upper level is envisioned as a radiator ensuring a natural stack ventilation.

Approved Document A — Structure The primary structure of the building is a reinforced concrete frame column and in-situ concrete slab structure and Timber housing structure supporting an external envelope. Consideration would be required for high loads derived from housing above. Approved Document B — Fire Safety When calculating fire resistance period, the building has been considered as divided in two parts, Lower market and upper housing. The part of the building hosting the market is between 5-7.5m high. This part of the building needs to have a period of structural fire resistance of 120 minutes. The Housing area is taller than 15m, and therefore requires a period of structural fire resistance of 120 minutes. This will be applied to any new load-bearing elements of the structure. Approved Document C — Site preparation and resistance to contaminants and moisture As part of the enabling works, a geo-environmental survey would be undertaken to identify the ground conditions and presence of any contaminants. Approved Document D — Toxic substances Concerning the cavity insulation used within the new build, reasonable precautions shall be taken to prevent the subsequent permeation of an toxic fumes from the material into any part of the building occupied by the people.

Approved Document G — Sanitation, hot water safety and water efficiency The design of the services related to Part G should be completed by a MEP Engineer. Together with supply of domestic hot and cold water, and toilets throughout the building, consideration should be taken for rainwater capture and filtration in its utilization for evaporative cooling. Approved Document H — Drainage and waste disposal This document covers details of foul water drainage, both above and below ground, pipe sizes, protection of pipes, manholes and inspection chambers. The design of these elements should be serviceable and adequately sized. Approved Document J — Combustion appliances and fuel storage systems Considerations would be ensuring no built up of carbon monoxide and flue duct routes from any fuel burning market stall and household cooking devices.

10.0 Building Control Report 10.0 BUILDING CONTROL REPORT

take note of the following.

PART D- TOXIC SUBSTANCES

ramp) and facade (tiled).

a. In all cases,

D1. Concerning the cavity insulation used within the new build, reasonable precaustions shall be taken to prevent the subsequent permation of an tocix fumes from the material into any part of the building occupied by the people.

B1 ( means of warning and escape)

Approved Document K — Protection from falling, collision and impact B2 (AllInternal fire guarding is spread-linings) set at a height above finished floor level of 1.1m and balustrades at 0.9m above the stair pitch. Moreover, B3 (internal red spreadstructure) due to thefiamount of glazing, particular attention is to be paid to manifestations to large glazed areas and protection against impact. Glazing is spread-roots) all to be laminated safety glazing, with B4 (2) (external fire mullions or decorative etched manifestations.

Due to the multiple programs being proposed on the site a rigorous report will follow this document as to both the seperation of internal programs and also the seperation of the built structure acoustically from neighbouing buildings. Considering building B is of an industrial nature their will be alatent noise and movement within and around he building which will need to be factored in.

Approved Document L — Conservation of fuel and power The building has been designed so that its insulation performs C2 over (2) (interstitial surface condenstation) and above and the requirements set in this documents. Specific details will be required to prevent cold bridging. It is 3D - Structural Iso building F1 (ventilation) recommended that SBEM modeling is 2undertaken to Proposed analyze the design, and identify any areas that needs to be improved. G1 The (coldbuilding water utilities supply)every input and output of energy and heat endemic to the site.

G3(1) to (3) hot water supply and systems

Approved Document M — Access to and use of buildings Particular attention has been paid to ramp gradients and G4 stair (sanitary conveniences) pitches. An access strategy should be compiled by the building user to ensure they understand how to manage G5 access (bathrooms) to and from the building.

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

No.

Description

Date

NCP ltd. Wasteminster

H6(solid waste storage)R — Electronic communications Approved Document

Structural Axo's

It is anticipated that the building would comply to all the

J1 to J4 (combustion requirements set outapplicances) in this document as it would require

0001

Project number

1705-15

Date

internet connection from day one, particularly to market and retail spaces. of fuel and power- dwellings. L1 (conservation

Further consideration has been made to the historic status of the existing reatained buildings. As the site exists in a conservation area and contains a listed ( RC

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

This section will concentrate on the building Regulations section 6: new buildings other than dwellings and

Electrical design should be undertaken by a specialist Engineer, and all work should be installed, inspected and H1 (foul water drawinage) tested in accordance to this document and BS7671.

3D - Structural Iso building Existing

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

PART F- VENTILATION

Approved and Document P — Electricalareas) Safety G6(kitchens good preparation

Consultant Address Address Phone Fax e-mail

PART E- RESITANCE TO THE PASSAGE OF SOUND

B5 (access and facilities for the fire service)

P1 (electrical safety)

www.autodesk.com/revit

Author

Drawn by

Checker

Checked by

Fig. 75:Existing retained ramp and facade to Brewer Street.

P50

3D - Structural Iso building Proposed Timber Scale

5/17/2017 10:38:16 AM

108

Existing Grade II listed Ramp Existing Grade II listed Facade

BREWER STREET CAR PARK, SOHO, LONDON W1F 0LA | DESIGN PRINCIPLES DOCUMENT

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

11.0 Appropriate Design Guideline Report

11.0 Appropriate Design Guideline Report 11.1 Introduction

Guidelines

Due to the buildingâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s multiple programs and complex relationship between programs the following guidelines have been adopted and adhered to:

UN SDG Goals 2030

1. BREEAM for sustainable measures of building and use 2. CELSIUS for heat capture/utilization and district heating. 3. BCO for retail, market offices and lobbies 4. Health and Safety for where people eat and work 5. London Housing Design Guide 6. HSG129 for the energy/waste plan; and 7. Security and crowd control. 1. BREEAM The building as seen in Chapter 7 in more detail has been designed to address the UN Goals for 2030 namely with the reuse and sustainable use of waste, energy, pollution, water and management. The buildingâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s uses are designed with BREEAM and CEEQUAL for its infrastructural scale and uses around heat capture and utilization, BREEAM as Refurbishment and fit out and new construction.

BREEAM Goals

The proposal is also developed in line with the guidance from CELSIUS (a partnership of five EU cities and aims to demonstrate how the efficiency and performance of district heating systems can be improved by focusing on the opportunity that they offer for capturing and utilizing sources of waste heat that are generated within cities, CELSIUS were instrumental in the development of the Bunhill energy centers that the proposition connects to) The ultimate goal of the proposal is to go above and beyond the guidelines related to sustainability, it seeks to question and push the limits of how we envision sustainability. Resulting in a building that utilizes energy in a new and exciting manner, seeing it as a valuable resource instead of a simple design consideration.

CELSIUS Overview

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

12.0 Value Engineering Cost Report

12.0 Value Engineering Cost Report 12.1 Indicative Cost Outline

Indicative Cost Outline

The following section evaluates the cost of construction for the entire project, The project has been divided into two parts.

1. The Ground Floor including the Market, Retail edge, both station entrances and the Refurbished Listed buildings.

2. The Residential floor including roof and external facade.

Ground Floor including the Market, Retail edge, both station entrances and the Refurbished Listed buildings.

The Residential floor including roof and external facade.

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

12.0 Value Engineering Cost Report 12.2 Indicative Cost Report Part 1

Indicative cost Model Part 1 Area (sqm) Gross internal Area:

8754

Net Internal Area ( Retail)

2432

Net Internal Area ( Market + Stations + Public Space)

6322

Shell & Core Construction Cost

27,750,180

3,170

Fit out Cost:

7,510,932

858

Total Current Day Construction Cost ( SAY):

35,261,112

SHELL & CORE WORKS Element

No. 1

Demolition and enabling works ( Cut and Carve)

Substructure (N/A)

Superstructure

Qty.

Unit

Rate (£/m2)

Total

8072 m2

190

1.533,680

0 m2

4755 m2

400

1,902,000

450 m2

400

180,000

3.1

Concrete Floor

3.2

Cloumns + Elevator Shaft

3.3

Light Wells

1235 m2

750

926,250

3.4

External Facade

2146 m2

1500

3,219,000

3.5 4

Internal partions and wall infills Plant in disused underground station

3576 m2 1 nr

500

1,178,000

Fittings, Furnishings & Equipment

6416 m2

200

1,283,200

Disposal and water installations, heat source, space heating,

8516 m2

1000

8,516,000

Lift installations

3 nr

Utility connections (electricity, gas, water, telecoms, sewer)

1 item

External Works

130000

1416 m2

25 Sub-Total

Main Contractor's Preliminaries Main Contractor's Overheads & Profit Design Development & Construction Risk Allowance Total Current Day Shell & Core Construction Cost (SAY):

390,000 250,000 35,400 19,413,530

15%

2,912,030

970,677

10%

1,941,353

25,237,590

Total Current Day Construction Cost ( SAY):

23,612,814

SHELL & CORE WORKS Element

No.

12.0 Value Engineering Cost Report

120

12.2 INDICATIVE COST REPORT BUILDING A

Demolition and enabling works ( Cut and Carve)

Substructure (N/A)

Superstructure

3.1 3.2

Area (sqft)

6,416

Net Internal Area ( Retail) Internal Area ( offices+ library+ urban farming) Gross internalNet Area: Net Internal Area (Biota) Net Internal Area (Housing) Shell & Core Construction Cost Fit out Cost:

Shell and Core Construction Cost

Total Current Day Construction Cost ( SAY):

20,337,233

3,271,554

69,016

Area2,603 (sqm) 3,813 13508 4020 9488 3,170

28,018

64,600

12.0 Value Engineering Cost Report 1,235 m2

450

555,750

250 m2

450

112,500

3.5

Internal partions and wall infills

6,416 m2

100

641,600

115 m2

1,725

Installation of metal gantrytodecking Internal finishes generally reception areas, stair cores, WC ares and plant rooms

Fittings, Furnishings Equipment Services, installations&generally, including sanitary apliances, disposal and water installations, heat source, space heating,

Overhead factory beam 10t

Lift installations

Utility connections (electricity, gas, water, telecoms, sewer)

External Works

295

6,416 m2

200

1,283,200

6,416 m2

1,000

6,416,000

Proposal Total 1 nr

90,000

130,000

390,000

1 item

250,000

6,416

Part 1 25,237,590£Sub-Total Part 2 37,468,926£

Main Contractor's Preliminaries

750 926,250 12.3 Indicative 1,500 4,752,000 Cost Report Part 2

1 m2

3 nr

Main Contractor's Overheads & Profit

2250 (reduced due to low housing costs) Design Development & Construction Risk Allowance

23,612,814

190

0 m2

3,168 m2

41,043

858

340 m2

1,235 m2

Area (sqm)

Grand Total 62,706,516£

Total Current Day Shell & Core Construction Cost (SAY): SHELL & CORE WORKS

Total Current Day Construction Cost ( SAY): Element

No.

£ Qty.

FIT OUT OF OFFICS+LIBRARY AND URBAN FARMING

30,393,000 Unit

Rate (£/m2)

SHELL & CORE WORKS (Costs have been adjusted due to inexpensive construction techniques of housing units) 1

Demolition and enabling works ( Cut and Carve)

Substructure (N/A) 2 Element

No.

Superstructure

340 m2

Qty.

Single floor Gluelam 3.1 1300mm Glulam Rooftimber including finishes and insulation Cost Demolition and enabling works between (£300-500) 3.2 Substructure Extra over for enhanced roof finishes/soft planting to terrace area 3.3 Superstructure

1 2 3

3.4

External Facade

3.5

Internal partions and wall infills

0 m2

Unit

190

64,600

0 Rate (£/m2) Total 0

1,235 m2 0 m2 250 m2 m2 13508

450 750

1,500

4,752,000

6,416 m2

100

641,600

115 m2

Staggered Concrete Slab

8,185 m2

3.2 4

Timber Post and Beam Structural Frame Including CLT Floor Slabs

9488 m2

Housing Internal Walls Doors ares and plantand rooms 5

94881 m2 m2 2372 6,416 m2 m2

830,200 200350 1,283,200

disposal and installations, heat source, space heating, 7 Fittings, Furnishings & water Equipment

6,416 m2 m2 6488

1,000 2006,416,000 1,297,600

Installation of metal gantrytodecking Internal finishes generally reception areas, stair cores, WC

Housing Roof; 200mm thick CLT slab and finishes Fittings, Furnishings &generally, Equipment 6 Services, installations including sanitary apliances,

6 7

Overhead beam 10t 8 External Curtain Wallfactory Facade

nr 30591 m2

8 9

External Roof Utility connections (electricity, gas, water, telecoms, sewer) 10 Extra over for Facade cleaning equipment

3453 m2 1 item 2 nr

Disposal and water installations, heat source, space heating,

7325 m2

Utility connections (electricity, gas, water, telecoms, sewer)

External Works

Lift installations

External Works

3 nr

500

1 item

Main Contractor's Overheads & Profit

1500 5,179,500 250,000 250,000 500,000

Sub-Total 15%

1.1

158,500

2,346,604

782,201

15%20,337,233 4,323,338 5% 1,441,113 10% 2,882,225

Qty.

Unit

Rate (£/m2)

Total

37,468,926

3,813 m2

133,455

3,813 m2

625

2,383,125

Sub-Total Main Contractor's Preliminaries Main Contractor's Overheads & Profit Design Development & Construction Risk Allowance BREWER STREET CAR PARK, SOHO, LONDON W1F 0LA | DESIGN PRINCIPLES DOCUMENT Total Current Day Fit Out Cost (SAY):

5,493,750

Architectural works 1 Current Total Day Shell & Core Construction Cost (SAY):

Making good of existing floors, walls and colums of the RC framed building Services instillations generally to office areas, including condensate drainage, FCU installations, heating and chilled water installations, ductwork and grilles, primary containment and mech power supplies, cleaners sockets, lighting installation & lighting controls, sprinkler and fire alarm installations, automatic controls, BWIC, Testing and commissioning and engineering services preliminaries

160,400

750

Total Current Day Fit Out Cost (SAY):

Indicative cost Model Building B

15,644,025 250,000

Total Current Day Shell & Core Construction Cost (SAY): Main Contractor's Preliminaries Main Contractor's Overheads & Profit FIT OUT OF OFFICS+LIBRARY AND URBAN FARMING Design Development & Construction Risk Allowance Element

90,000 4,588,500

390,000

Main Contractor's Preliminaries Main Contractor's Overheads & Profit Design Development & Construction Risk Allowance

Gross internal Area: Net Internal Area ( Urban Farming) Net Internal Area (Waste management facility + Energy Centre) Net Internal Area (Hotel) Public Circulation (Ramp) Shell & Core Construction Cost

160,400 15,644,025

15%

2,346,604

782,201

10%

1,564,403

20,337,233

BASIS OF ESTIMATE • It is assumed that the Market spaces will be delivered to Qty. (£/m2) Totalfloors, exposed concrete Cat AUnit only, with Rate raised access soffits and exposed mechanical and electrical service installations. 3,813retail m2 133,455 • The spaces will be 35 delivered as Shell and Core for fitting out by the incoming tenant. • BREEAM NC rating of Excellent • Gross external areas taken from the London School of Architecture area schedule, with gross internal and net 3,813 m2 areas derived from 625 them. 2,383,125 internal Sub-Total

948,000

90,0001500

Architectural works Making good of existing floors, walls and colums of the RC framed building Services instillations generally to office areas, including condensate drainage, FCU installations, heating and chilled water installations, ductwork and grilles, primary containment and mech power supplies, cleaners sockets, lighting installation & lighting controls, sprinkler and fire alarm installations, automatic controls, BWIC, Testing and commissioning and engineering services preliminaries

1,725

100

Sub-Total 28,822,250 10% 1,564,403

Design Development & Construction Risk Allowance

No.

3,795,200

130,000

3170 m2

Main Contractor's Preliminaries

4,092,500

400

6,416

1.1

926,250

3,168 m2

3.1

0 555,750 0 112,500 1,688,500

450125

1,235 m2

Element

No.

Total

area

Gross internal Area:

Rate (£/m2)

External Facade

Indicative cost Model Part 2

Single floor Gluelam 1300mm Glulam Rooftimber including finishes and insulation Cost between (£300-500) Extra over for enhanced roof finishes/soft planting to terrace

Unit

3.4

3.3

Indicative cost Model Building A

Qty.

2,516,580

EXCLUSIONS 15%in the 377,487 No allowance has been made above figures for the 5% 125,829 following: 10% 251,658 • Value added tax £ 3,271,554 • Client finance costs • Tender price and construction inflation. • Currency fluctuations • Professional and legal fees Area (sqm) Area (sqft) • Fees or costs associated 8,185with rights 88,103to light agreements, 2,429 26,146 party wall awards, oversailing agreements etc. 3,427 36,888 • Section 106 2,016 21,700 • Costs associated with Planning and 313 3,369Building regulation fees £ 32,687,985 3,994 371 • Abnormal ground conditions • Tenant fit out beyond category A to offices areas, assume carpets, floor boxes and blinds by tenant. • Diversion of existing services • Benefits arising form any potential Capital Allowances of enhanced capital Allowances.

2,516,580 15% 5% 10%

377,487 125,829 251,658

3,271,554

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

13.0 Procurement Report

13.0 Procurement Report 12.3 Procurement Method

Procurement Method

In the traditional approach, the client accepts that consultants are appointed for design, cost control, and contract administration, and that the contractor is responsible for carrying out the Works. The responsibility of the latter extends to all workmanship and materials, including work by subcontractors and suppliers. In some cases the client will select some of the sub-contractors to be engaged by the contractor (variously referred to as named, nominated, or preselected). In such cases the contractor may take full responsibility for their performance, or the contractorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s responsibility may be limited in some way, in which case a collateral warranty between client and subcontractor will be essential. The contractor is usually chosen after competitive tendering on documents giving complete information. However, the contractor can be appointed earlier, either through negotiation or on the basis of partial or notional information. This gives the client and architect ultimate control over the realization of the proposal which is paramount in the given situation. However, because of the physical size, complexity in ownership, capital costs and time scale of the project it is proposed to use the design and build. Included in the work the majority of the work will be completed as Shell & Core with Reserve Matter Applications for phases of the project to be built over the period between 2018- 2030.

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document

14.0 Programme

Wasteminster PHASE 1

2018

2019

2020

Conservatory, 1 Long Ln, Barbican, London EC1A 9HA l Design Principals document