$4.95 POST APPROVED PP255003/06906
ISSUE 8.10 May 2011
Soft dollar perks fated for prohibition
Max Franchitto
A financial
services consultant questions the future of volume-based incentives Alternative remuneration for sales volumes, or soft dollar benefits, should be eradicated from the mortgage broking industry, according to a financial planning industry expert. Soft dollar benefits above $300, along with commissions in general, have been banned by government regulation of the financial planning
industry. Max Franchitto, a leading financial services consultant and managing principal of MGF Consulting Group, believes soft dollar commissions in mortgage broking should eventually suffer the same fate. Franchitto said he does not believe it is possible for brokers to accept soft dollar benefits and fulfil their responsible lending requirements under NCCP. He believes it is impossible to remain unbiased when recommending credit products because soft dollar benefits are at stake. “I say, you can’t. We’re all human, and if you needed one
more sale to qualify for a husband and wife trip to Bangkok, all expenses paid, why wouldn’t you? Remove the temptation, and you’ll probably remove the sin,” he said. Franchitto pointed to the ultimate outcome in the financial planning industry of soft dollar benefits, and said the mortgage broking industry can expect public attention to turn towards this form of remuneration, as the industry becomes more heavily regulated. “This same big issue applied to any soft dollar benefits that financial planners received. Industry groups either started to reject them or failed to fully disclose them upfront. Now, most don’t accept them – they’re not interested in getting incentivised that way.” This public attention, Franchitto believes, could centre on the perception that soft dollar remuneration has the potential to erode broker independence. He argues, even if they’re properly disclosed, it could run the risk of jeopardising the broker-client relationship. “The consumer wants to know they’re getting referred to a product or buying a product that suits them and fits their needs – not one that gives the advisor’s a bonus trip overseas. It leaves a bad taste in the client relationship if they think that’s the only reason they’re being sold a product,” Franchitto remarked. Page 20 cont.
>>
DEF ban slam Big brokers lambast competition policy after Senate inquiry Page 2
Get unscrewed Non-banks a respite from rough major bank treatment: Driscoll Page 4
‘No quitting’ Westpac forced to defend channel commitment Page 14
Inside this issue Analysis 22 Skype face-to-face face-off Viewpoint 24 Senate inquiry report reaction Insight 26 Old marketing, or new marketing? Market talk 28 Budget 2011: Winners and losers Toolkit 30 Your fee-for-service guide People 32 Webcke kicks off Homeloans branches Caught on camera Iden celebrates 10 years
33