IRJET- Performance of CP-OFDM, PCC-OFDM and UFMC-OFDM for 5G Uplink Communication

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 08 Issue: 05 | May 2021

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

PERFORMANCE OF CP-OFDM, PCC-OFDM AND UFMC-OFDM FOR 5G UPLINK COMMUNICATIONS Mrs. J. Monica Jenifer1, Nithiya Partheeban2, B. Nithya Lakshmi3, U. Prathiba4, T. Preethy5 1Research

scholar, 2,3,4,5UG Students, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Adhiyamaan College of Engineering, Krishnagiri district, Tamilnadu, India

---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------

Abstract - In the advancement of technological era,

networks (e.g., long-term Evolution/LTE and worldwide Interoperability For Microwave get right of entry to/WiMAX), and the 5G New Radio (NR). but, the excessive top-To-average energy Ratio (PAPR) trouble of OFDM remains an extended-standing implementation issue. Many studies have taken into consideration a way to perform the transmit power Amplifier (PA) in its linear area with much less enter again-Off (IBO). This is, to be more electricityefficient. Although lowering the PAPR of the sign is an difficulty both on the uplink and downlink, it's far extra crucial for the uplink, attributable to the constrained cost and energy-price range of person gadget.

Communication being the first and foremost important aspect of technology which is improving day by day. In order to step forward towards the innovations, this “PERFORMANCE OF CPOFDM, PCC-OFDM AND UFMC-OFDM FOR 5G UPLINK COMMUNICATIONS” has been undertaken. In this system we are using PCC-OFDM which is suitable for 5-G uplink communication. As it's miles localized in each time and frequency area.%-OFDM in Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) calls for 3 dB decrease sign-To-Noise Ratio (SNR) for a given Bit-mistakes-charge(BER), and the SNR benefit of PCCOFDM will increase swiftly while there are timing and/or frequency offsets and it compares PCC-OFDM(PolynomialCancellation-Coded-Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) with CP-OFDM(Cyclic Prefix Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) and UFMC-OFDM(Universal Filtered Multicarrier Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing ) in the uplink of multiuser system using OFDMA(Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access).There is no need of guard–band because for a given channel ,greater constellation will be used.

As PAs are one of the maximum energy-hungry additives of a person device transceiver, the power efficiency may be improved by means of green PA conversion that could enlarge the battery life of the person system. As a substitute, it can substantially improve the transmission electricity to boom the wide variety of cell-facet users and the signal-ToNoise Ratio (SNR) on the same IBO. Consequently, PAPR has been appeared as one of the requirements of waveform layout for 5G and beyond. although, the 0.33 generation Partnership task (3GPP) nevertheless makes use of the Cyclic Prefix (CP)-OFDM and Discrete Fourier transform-unfold OFDM (DFT-s-OFDM) because the waveforms of 5G NR . This postpones many waveform applicants which include filter-bank Multicarrier (FBMC), Generalized Frequency division Multiplexing (GFDM), familiar Filtered Multicarrier (UFMC), WindowedOFDM (W-OFDM), and Filtered-OFDM (F-OFDM) especially because of their high-PAPR essence and occasional LTE compatibility.

Key Words: 5G , uplink, OFDM, PCC-OFDM, UFMC-OFDM,CPOFDM, timing offset, frequency offset, guard band ,SNR,BER,AWGN

1. INTRODUCTION The design of 5G cellular network were given many new challenges not faced by means of earlier generations of mobile get entry to era because it has to meet extensive variety of various services.CP-OFDM has been the premise of many current Wi-Fi verbal exchange structures. It really works well in downlink communication and not appropriate for uplink of the huge gadget type communiqué (MMTC).For uplink communiqué PCC-OFDM is appropriate which is much localised in both frequency and time area and is very orthogonal. it is also compatible with CP-OFDM and additionally with MIMO(a couple of enter multiple Output).

2.RELATED WORK In Existing System the following was made: CP-OFDM and UFMC. DFT –spread OFDM used to increase performance.

Orthogonal frequency department Multiplexing (OFDM) underlies current Wi-Fi verbal exchange systems along with IEEE 802.eleven a/g/n/ac wireless neighbourhood area Networks (WLANs), digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB), virtual Video Broadcasting (DVB), fourth-era (4G) mobile © 2021, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

Guard symbols.

Not orthogonal.

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 67

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 08 Issue: 05 | May 2021

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

[1]. In the first system it was purely dedicated towards using CP-OFDM ,and UFMC-OFDM which was not suitable for mMTC uplink communication [2]. It gave an advanced feature of using DFT technique which had some disadvantages like it was not suitable when traffic was created [3]. This system required a guard band in between the signals due to which it needed more time for transmission.

[4]. Atlas Simple adaption technique was not suited for 5G applications and it also did not had orthogonality in signals.

Fig -3: Block Diagram of PCC OFDM using Blind CFO estimation

3. METHODOLOGY Frequency Division Multiplexing) with CP-OFDM(Cyclic Prefix Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) and UFMC-OFDM(Universal Filtered Multicarrier Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing ) in the uplink of multiuser system using OFDMA(Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access).There is no need of guard–band because for a given channel ,greater constellation will be used Localized in Frequency and time Domain, It is orthogonal and follows weighted-overlap-and-add (WOLA) technique.

Mapping data to adjacent pair of carriers. Compatible with CP-OFDM and also with MIMO.No frequency guard bands.

Robust to frequency and Time Offsets, Phase Noise. No degration in signals. Insensitive to Doppler spread.

Transmission rate is increased. The system block diagram is shown in figure 1

4. SOFTWARE USED 1. Matlab R2012a version MATLAB is a high-overall language for technical programming in an clean-to-use surroundings where issues and solutions are expressed in familiar mathematical notation. Usual modern-day encompass: • Math and computation • set of rules improvement • Modeling, simulation, and prototyping • Information analysis, exploration, and Visualization • Medical and engineering graphics • Software development, consisting of Graphical person Interface constructing This makes you to clear up many technical computing issues, in particular people with matrix and vector formulations, in a fraction modern-day the time it would take to jot down software in a scalar no interactive language together with C or FORTRAN. The name MATLAB stands for matrix laboratory.

Fig -1: Block Diagram of CP OFDM using cyclic prefix

Fig -4: Matlab software

Fig -2: Block Diagram of PCC OFDM using training sequence. © 2021, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 68

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 08 Issue: 05 | May 2021

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

Fig -5: Matlab software

Fig -8: BER vs. SNR FOR CP OFDM input part.

5. EXPERIMENTAL RESULT We have developed innovative technique which is shown in fig6, fig7, fig8, fig9 and in fig10.

Fig -9: BER vs. SNR FOR CP OFDM based on the input

Fig -6: BER vs. SNR FOR PCC OFDM

Fig -10: BER vs. SNR FOR UFMC OFDM

6. CONCLUSIONS We have proposed, which OFDM technique provides best solution for 5G uplink communication. For this we have compared certain features of all the three OFDM to mark the best suitable for communication. Based on the design

Fig -7: FREQUENCY vs. POWER SPECTRUM FOR PCC OFDM © 2021, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 69

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 08 Issue: 05 | May 2021

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

principles and requirement, a system for Performance of CPOFDM, PCC-OFDM and UFMC-OFDM for 5G Uplink Communication has been developed.

[13]

REFERENCES [1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7] [8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[14]

M. Sha , A. F. Molisch, P. J. Smith, T. Haustein, P. Zhu, P. Silva,F. Tufvesson, A. Benjebbour, and G. Wunder, ‘‘5G: A tutorial overview of standards, trials, challenges, deployment, and practice,’’ IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1201 1221, Jun. 2017.s S. Premnath, D. Wasden, S. K. Kasera, N. Patwari, and B. Farhang-Boroujeny, ‘‘Beyond OFDM: Besteffort dynamic spectrum access using lterbank multicarrier,’’ IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 869 882, Jun. 2013..

V. Vakilian, T. Wild, F. Schaich, S. ten Brink, and J.-F. Frigon, ‘‘Universal-ltered multi-carrier technique for wireless systems beyond LTE,’’ in Proc. IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), Dec. 2013, pp.

223 228..

G. Kongara and J. Armstrong, ‘‘Implementation of PCC OFDM on a software de ned radio platform,’’ in Proc. 26th Int. Telecommun. Netw. Appl. Conf.

(ITNAC), Dec. 2016, pp. 295 299.

S. H. Han and J. H. Lee, ‘‘An overview of peak-toaverage power ratio reduction techniques for multicarrier transmission,’’ IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 56 65, Apr. 2005.

B. E. Priyanto, H. Codina, S. Rene, T. B. Sorensen, and P. Mogensen, ‘‘Initial performance evaluation of DFT-spread OFDM based SC-FDMA for UTRA LTE uplink,’’ in Proc. IEEE 65th Veh. Technol. Conf., Apr. 2007,pp.3175 3179.

B. Farhang-Boroujeny, ‘‘OFDM versus lter bank multicarrier,’’ IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 28, no.

3, pp. 92 112, May 2011.

G. Wunder, P. Jung, M. Kasparick, T. Wild, F. Schaich, Y. Chen, S. Ten Brink, I. Gaspar, N. Michailow, and A. Festag, ‘‘5GNOW: Non-orthogonal, asynchronous waveforms for future mobile applications,’’ IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 97 105, Feb. 2014.

T. Tang, Y. Zhang, J. Jiang, and P. Zhang, ‘‘A MIMOPCC-OFDM system for multipath fading channels with carrier frequency offset,’’ in Proc. Int. Symp.

Commun. Inf. Technol., 2006, pp. 511 515.

X. Li and J. Armstrong, ‘‘An improved MIMO PCC OFDM system with reduced sensitivity to imperfect CSI,’’ in Proc. IEEE Wireless Commun. Netw. Conf.

(WCNC), Apr. 2010, pp. 1 6.

J. Armstrong, ‘‘Analysis of new and existing methods of reducing intercar-rier interference due to carrier frequency offset in OFDM,’’ IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 365 369, Mar. 1999.

Y. Zhao and S.-G. Haggman, ‘‘Sensitivity to Doppler shift and carrier frequency errors in OFDM systems© 2021, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

[15]

[16] [17]

[18]

the consequences and solutions,’’ in Proc. IEEE 46th Veh. Technol. Conf., vol. 3, May 1996, pp. 1564 1568.

Y. Zhao and S. G. Haggman, ‘‘Intercarrier interference self-cancellation scheme for OFDM mobile communication systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1185 1191, Jul. 2001.

J. Shentu and J. Armstrong, ‘‘Blind estimation of time and frequency offset for PCC-OFDM,’’ in Proc. IEEE 53rd Veh. Technol. Conf., vol. 1, May 2001, pp. 702 706.

J. Shentu, K. Panta, and J. Armstrong, ‘‘Effects of phase noise on perfor-mance of OFDM systems using an ICI cancellation scheme,’’ IEEE Trans.

Broadcast., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 221 224, Jun. 2003.

W. T. Ng and V. K. Dubey, ‘‘Analysis of PCC-OFDM systems for general time-varying channel,’’ IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 394 396, May 2005.

T. van Waterschoot, V. L. Nir, J. Duplicy, and M. Moonen, ‘‘Analytical expressions for the power spectral density of CP-OFDM and ZP-OFDM signals,’’ IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 371 374, Apr. 2010.

S. Boumard, M. Lasanen, O. Apilo, A. Hekkala, C. Cassan, J.-P. Verdeil, J. David, and L. Pichon, ‘‘Power consumption trade-off between power ampli er OBO, DPD, and clipping and ltering,’’ in Proc. 26th Int. Tele-traf c Congr. (ITC), Sep. 2014, pp. 1 5.

BIOGRAPHY: Mrs. J. Monica Jenifer, Research Scholar, Engineering Department, Adhiyamaan College of Engineering, Anna University.

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 70