INSTITUT FÜR KUNST UND ARCHITEKTUR
ADP ANALOGUE DIGITAL PRODUCTION CMT CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL TECHNOLOGY
www.akbild.ac.at/ika
ESC ECOLOGY SUSTAINABILITY CULTURAL HERITAGE
INSTITUTE REVIEW FOR ART WINTER AND 2019 ARCHITECTURE foundation blocks of the enriched soil, the secret weapon for the following semester’s undertaking.
CONSTRUCTION AND COMBUSTION CMT ESC Michelle Howard Christian Fröhlich Antonia Autischer Charlotte Beaudon Römer Marcella Brunner David Degasper Alice Hoffmann Felix Knoll Armin Maierhofer Lorenz Mang Nils Neuböck Lisa Prossegger Normunds Püne Moritz Schafschetzy Helena Schenavsky Julian Schönborn Sebastian Seib Matias Tapia Johannes Wiener Catherine Zesch Reviewers and guests Merritt Bucholz The Hochecker Family Adam Hudec Mortimer Müller Johannes Tintner-Olifier Harald Vacik
Burning Down the House I addresses HITZE in that it investigates fire and our ambiguous relationship with it. It also addresses the state of crisis that architects currently find themselves in – should we be accomplices of growth capitalism and continue to build wastefully as usual, or could we act and transform our profession? Could our path to a new equilibrium be cleared by burning down the house and sorting through the cinders, embers and ash? Wildfires have consumed tracts of forest from the Amazon to the Arctic on an unprecedented scale. Our house is burning down, and the resulting massive forest clearings have unbridled HITZE. Forest clearings are central to Western theories on the origins of architecture, where a primitive tribe arrives in a clearing to find the trees that have fallen to make it. The parable invariably describes only two possible outcomes: they use the wood to build a shelter or to build a bonfire. This semester, we looked at other possibilities and took an unbiased journey through the phenomenon of wildfire. Using the tools of the architect, we looked closely, investigating and reconstructing its behaviour in the forest and in the city. In a conscious effort of calibration between conjecture and activism, we embarked upon the step-by-step construction of soil using traceable and low impact production processes. Together with a collier family, we transformed wood into charcoal. → fig. 23-30 / p. 11 We constructed a composter and made humus. → fig. 1 / p. 5 These were the
We traced the paths of 18 Austrian forest wildfires using data provided by the Institute of Silviculture and information gathered by visiting the scene of each disaster, observing the fire’s traces, conducting interviews, and extracting soil and vegetation samples. Finally, we analysed it all using the tools of the architect. → fig. 5 / p. 6 Having gotten to know the forest wildfire, we used this in-depth knowledge to investigate fires in the city of Vienna and create projects that used the medium of the installation to relate what they had unearthed. Unearthing is the common thread running through these projects, from revealing the value of spaces that are the result of fire to the prying open of sealed ground. We began in the treetops and came down to the earth. Michelle Howard, Christian Fröhlich Design Studio BArch1, BArch3, MArch Thanks to: The Hochecker Family, for their guidance and for allowing us to spend so much time with them in the construction of the traditional wood charcoal kiln; Johannes Tintner-Olifiers (BOKU, Institute of Physics and Materials Science) for revealing to us more clearly how interconnected forest ecosystems are; Harald Vacik and Mortimer Müller (BOKU, Institute of Silviculture) for generously providing us with detailed information on our forest fires, and for their patience in responding to our constant requests.
→ fig. 13 / p. 9 → fig. 38-39 / p. 14 → fig. 53 / p. 19
There are, probably in each generation, crucial moments where one suddenly becomes aware that it is unthinkable to go on as before. Generally, these unsettling events do not offer hints of another, different path that even seems to be a viable one. Then again, what is viable in the face of the unprecedented transformative power of the ubiquitous New Climatic Regime 2? RAUMPARK – Faux Terrain Vienna is the title of a balancing act over two academic terms, a walk on the edge between the worlds of HITZE facts and of HITZE anticipations. RAUMPARK initially follows HITZE. RAUMPARKS are climatic devices; they are constructions of various sizes, operating on diverse scales, offering multidimensional populated (inhabited) parks, gardens and (“wild”) forests in and above our cities. HITZE indeed challenges the very foundations upon which our cities (and societies) are built. Its impact fundamentally challenges our idea of a ground and our relation to it. RAUMPARKS are descendants of a surprising liaison between megastructure concepts of the 20th century and an idea of a new type of urban wilderness. In our first testing stage, they proved to rely on existing (and anticipated) sociodemographic factors as well as on environmental constraints and promises. They were tested as a discrete system of interventions, each focusing on partial aspects of HITZE in Vienna. Whereas, for example, cool environments where tested as visionary reformulations of the Danube Island, Vienna’s success model of a megastructure (1972-88), areal fight clubs were designed to manage rage in an embattled heated-up future. Design Studio BArch1, BArch3, MArch
3 EXCERPTS FROM A WORK IN PROGRESS:
Maximilian Aelfers Olivia Ahn Florian Berrar Daniel Bracher Alexander Czernin Katharina Eder Christina Ehrmann Lucas Fischötter Elisabeth Fölsche Maximilian Gallo Burak Genc Alexander Groiss Christopher Gruber Jakob Jakubowski Ji Yun Lee George Mintas Jonathan Moser Maximilian Pertl Dana Radzhibaeva Ria Roberg Salome Schramm Johanna Syré Julia Wiesiollek
GLC GEOGRAPHY LANDSCAPES CITIES
present endless possibilities of richness in shape and use.
Reviewers and guests Kathrin Aste Andrea Börner Michael Hofstätter Georg Kolmayr Valerie Messini Johannes Porsch Thomas Proksch Thomas Romm
Hannes Stiefel, Luciano Parodi
CMT ESC Hannes Stiefel Luciano Parodi
HTC HISTORY THEORY CRITICISM
Landscape of healing and acting for a society of awareness proposes a way to cultivate the arts of living on a damaged planet, the challenging condition of heat included. The extent of ignorant, unconscious ways of behaving on this planet has triggered a fundamental change in the human mind. A radical shift in human culture has taken place: a symbiotic, deliberate way of life that is based on the awareness of coexistence. Necessary to enable bodies to live for and with the conditions evoked and not against them, an elevated landscape is embedded in the previously existing urban environment – a landscape for living, healing and acting; an infrastructure that offers the necessary flexibility to be able to integrate the unknown and contra dictions; a network, constantly extended by its inhabitants to slowly repair the terrible damage once caused by their own species. Regular and irregular structures
To cool the city in the most efficient way, all permanently sealed surfaces in the city are torn open. Asphalt and concrete disappear to make room for a diverse ecosystem. Vegetation, forests, ponds, streams, animals and all kinds of creatures settle in these regained areas. A vibrant wilderness spreads in all directions on the ground level, between the buildings of the city of Vienna. The existing buildings are mostly used for residential housing. Private homes function as the interface between nature, which is outside the front door, and the artificial elevated landscape above the city. As part of their daily routine, inhabitants either wander in the forests on the ground or spend time in the maze of walks, pathways, platforms and buildings situated in the structure of the landscapes gently lifted towards the sky. These intertwining layers are carefully woven with stories. Individuals of all sorts inhabiting this city are ultimately respon sible for the continuity of this most important task. The flow of informative imagi nation is the foundation, the wall, the pillar and the joint. To put this very special challenge into practice, the artificial landscape needs to offer various functions: structures for education and research, communal spaces, wells and gardens, all kinds of horizontal and vertical modules scanning the landscape and adapting to it. Salome Schramm
→ fig. 15-19 / p. 10 About the logic of the vague: Yes or no? Everything or nothing at all? True or false? The answer is a spectrum, a ribbon that bends into infinity. This RAUMPARK is an uncertain path. It is changing, constantly adapting, responding to the context. It is a way of pushing out order so chaos can fill it, arbitrariness manifested in material means. So chance becomes visible. It is that which is not in the range of our influence, what makes us creative. The unreasonable causes sense. This RAUMPARK challenges contextual thinking. It changes and adapts to the complex network of shifts within the city. Human influence is limited, we see. So implementations become local, in the way this RAUMPARK manifests dif ferently in this city, constantly responding to local circumstances. This RAUMPARK evolves by using manmade noxious substances. It transforms them, binds them, solidifies them – not water to wine, but at least dust to rock. So the untouchable becomes reachable. It is a chance to work with what already exists all around. Some new forms of space may evolve. This RAUMPARK combines artificiality and naturalness. By using technologically advanced methods, the unlikely unification of urban and rural space may become possible. So space becomes available. Due to a massive expansion of useable area, there is no breeding ground for territorial claims. This RAUMPARK reacts to new climatic conditions. It provides shade; it creates warming space. It caches humidity; it releases water. It blocks sunlight or reflects it when needed.
So life goes on. Differently. No apocalyptic event will stop us from doing what we want to do: exploring possibilities. Jonathan Moser
The RAUMPARK I imagine establishes a NEW CLIMATIC TERRAIN (NCT) — an instrument which [e]merges [out of] the oppositional distinction between natural and constucted, thus enabling an ecotechnical network, based on interrelations between all species, to form a complex environment of coexistence. The NCT doesn’t simply rest in the physical world, assuming some geographical position in the coordinate system of the city of Vienna. This projection of a new responsive ground constitutes both an approach/a method and the resulting space of a physical network of large and small-scale interventions. In order to explore this framework, one needs to take into account that ecology is not only “natural”, but also first and foremost cultural. There is no binary separation between natural and artificial, an object and its surrounding, the “real” and the virtual etc. As Timothy Morton puts it, environment consists of organisms; there is no external environment. Digital ecologies are becoming more and more relevant in facing transformations in climate conditions and the topic of HITZE. The possible scenarios of ecological transformations are situated in a realm of animated processes and a reoccurring perpetual novelty. NCT is not about direct solutions in combating global warming, but it is both a cognitive and a physical proposal for what kind of landscape that never existed before might become present in our desired future. Stepan Nesterenko
→ fig. 2 / p. 5 → fig. 48-49 / p. 17 → fig. 37 / p. 14 → fig. 54-55 / p.19 1 This review was written while living in quarantine due to COVID-19, the coronavirus that spread over the whole planet in 2020, killing approximately 20,000 people worldwide by early April 2020. All the measures that had been unthinkable for stopping global warming were effectively implemented by almost all governments within a few days. Social life as we knew it was put on hold. 2 Bruno Latour, Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime, Polity Press, Cambridge/ Oxford/Boston/New York, 2018
HTC GLC Alessandra Cianchetta Antje Lehn