40¢
70th Year, Issue No. 8 USPS 248-700
FEBRUARY 24-MARCH 2, 2011 A General Circulation Newspaper Serving The Community Since 1942
SERVING BATH, CHAPMAN, NORTHAMPTON, NAZARETH BOROS; ALLEN, E. ALLEN, MOORE, LEHIGH, BUSHKILL, LOWER NAZARETH & UPPER NAZARETH TWPS.
Moore transfers $1-million for Farmland preservation; plan Collection of electronic waste By BILL HALBFOERSTER The Home News
Moore Township’s Board of Supervisors on Tuesday, Feb. 5 voted to transfer $1-million of farmland preservation funds to the First National Bank of Palmerton. It will go into a 12-month CD for better interest. The supervisors said that the money will stay in that account until needed. It was noted that the Farmland Preservation open space ranking system has been approved for the township. The Environmental Advisory Council also approved the open space natural areas criteria. Glenn Shoemaker of the EAC encouraged the township to get involved in the electronic recycling program as administered by Tom Ditmar, Environmental Conservation Coordinator in Northampton County. Shoemaker said that this will help make people better stewards of the earth. He admitted that in past years he threw everything away, but not now. June 11 was set as a tentative date for the E-Waste collection that will take place at the Moore Township municipal building along Commu-
nity Drive. He provided a pamphlet about the program that lists minimal fees that are charged residents who bring in answering machines, batteries, cell phones, large copiers, keyboards, microwaves, CRT monitors, laptops, pagers, printers and other items. The largest fee charged is for televisions, $18. But the other fees range from 25-cents to $5.00 and are mostly $1.00 each. The fees will go to AERC Recycling Solutions of Allentown who will run the program. Supervisors’ Chairman Maynard Campbell acknowledged that programs like this have proven very successful if properly advertised, and said recycling has to be made more convenient. At Shoemaker’s request, the board approved giving the EAC $400 to spend on advertising in local community papers so that people know about it. Other Matters • Extensions of time were granted for the Luther Beil subdivision; S&S Home and Builders improvements; Countryside Manor. Mark Continued on page 7
Rep. Hahn announces Committee appointments
State Rep. Marcia Hahn has been appointed to serve on the following four standing committees for the 2011-12 legislative session by Speaker of the House Rep. Sam Smith (R-Jefferson/Armstrong/ Indiana): Game and Fisheries, Gaming Oversight, State Government and Human Services, on which she has also additionally been appointed to serve as secretary. The Game and Fisheries Committee addresses all legislation affecting the Fish and Boat and Game commissions. They also review both commissions’ capital expenditures requiring legislative
approval, including game land purchases and boat and fish improvements. The Gaming Oversight Committee legislates Pennsylvania’s gaming industry. Already this session, the committee has sent to the House floor bills dealing with subjects such as prevention of simulcasting in Pennsylvania of greyhound racing and moving the investigative arm of the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board to the attorney general's office. The agenda for the Human Services Committee, formerly part of the House Health and Continued on page 7
CIT students visit Harrisburg
CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION MONTH in Harrisburg was celebrated on Tuesday, Feb. 8. State Rep. Marcia Hahn (R-Northampton) met with members of the Career Institute of Technology in Easton at their display in the East Wing Rotunda of the state Capitol. Pictured with her (l-r): Gary Slawik, machine tool tech instructor, and students Nick Hendricks, Shane Fulmer and Brandon Black. – Contributed photo
Lehigh ZHB rejects Solar energy panels
By BILL HALBFOERSTER The Home News
In a 3-0 vote, the Lehigh Township Zoning Hearing Board on Thursday, Feb. 17, rejected plans to construct 7,000 solar energy panels at the Lehigh Elementary School. ZHB chairperson Katherine Mack read the decision on three points following an executive session that lasted just over one hour behind closed doors. ZHB solicitor Thomas Caffrey said they had nothing to add and that the evidentiary part of the hearing was closed. The executive session was allowed under the Sunshine Act, Caffrey said, but any vote they took had to be done in public. The ruling brought mixed reaction as expected – moments of happiness for the handful of residents who had opposed the plan, and a vow to appeal the decision by the parties affected who are planning the solar array: MetroTek Electrical Services, Energy Alliance LLC, and the Northampton Area School District. Unlike an earlier hearing, in which residents were allowed to comment, this time it was between the MetroTek attorney, Christopher Spa-
doni and Lisa Pereira, who argued in behalf of the township as she filled in for Atty. James Preston. Mrs. Mack said that the ZHB took a look at the finding of facts presented by Zoning Officer Laura Harrier, who originally rejected the plan for the solar panel field in an agricultural - residential zone, and her opinion that it was a second principal use, and deemed commercial, so that the application for an accessory use should be rejected. Also denied were an application for a special exception use and an interpretation of Ms. Harrier’s opinion that she misapplied the law. Members of the ZHB are Katherine Mack, Kristin Lorah and Lloyd Hopkins. Earlier in the hearing, Spadoni said that Harrier’s objections to the project were not based on fact, and that the applicants believe that the solar installation is an accessory use, based on the Lehigh Township zoning ordinance. Quoting legal opinions in other cases, Spadoni said Ms. Harrier based her decision on the belief that it is a commercial use, and contended that “Uses need to keep up with
the technology, and easements need to be expanded.” He said that concern about the size of the solar panels is not the controlling factor, and that the solar field is “incidental and subordinate” to the school use. He cited where accessory use has come into play in other cases in Pennsylvania. On another concern, lot coverage with impervious surface, he said there is none because the panels would be above the ground with space between them. Spadoni concluded his argument that the ZHB would be compelled under the township’s zoning ordinance and PA. Municipalities Planning Code to find that the solar field is an accessory use. Atty. Pereira said, “Understand what the courts have ruled on principal and accessory use. The distinction here is that the school is the principal use, while the solar project can’t be controlled by the school district, but by Energy Alliance. Because of that lack of control and separate ownership, it can’t be an accessory to the school.” Spadoni responded, “That’s such a slippery slope, it deContinued on page 13
2 0 1 0 L e B E A M C o m m u n i t y S p i r i t Aw a rd R e c i p i e n t