Expat Partner Support HR Newsletter | September 2013 Welcome to the September Global Connection HR Newsletter. This quarterly publication will inform you about policy and operations and keep you up-to-date on expat partner issues. It also contains the latest news on Global Connection spousal support activities, including research and HR consultancy, and an article about our Partner Support Policy Workshop.
FACT-BASED DECISION MAKING I believe in factual decision-making, based on our surveys. Our recent surveys confirmed my gut feeling about three important issues (see also pages 1 and 2). Standing still = decline The on-going increase of non-familyrelated activities of expat partners, combined with a generally stagnant support volume, has led to an average drop of 8% (2011-2013) in ‘support needs met’ scores; this represents an average opportunity loss per company, participating in our demand survey, of at least 2 million euros, excluding the consequences of a reduced mobility (see the ROI article in our Newsletter of December 2012). This is a worrying trend, which confirms that partner support is still not regarded by many companies as an investment for successful assignments; rather, it is seen as part of the relocation costs and thus needs to be minimised. Managing expectations about paid work The majority of expat partners abandon their desire to work once they are located, which leads me to conclude that partners’ expectations need to be more properly managed. A Needs Assessment can be a great help here. Ineffectiveness of ‘Gucci money’ The ‘support needs met’ scores confirmed that ‘Gucci money’ cash payments are ineffective and rarely perceived as partner support. Replacing this by a more effective support programme is often a challenging and time-consuming exercise, so we have decided to help the partners of our clients who offer this form of payment with a ‘Needs Assessment’ facility via our web store. Cycles of Change workshops and coaching can now also be bought online. We remain sceptical, however, about the use of Gucci-type payments for partner support, also because many partners are not aware of the availability of the allowance. Jacqueline van Haaften
PARTNER SUPPORT DEMAND Global Connection Partner Support Demand Survey 2013 (n=588) Ranking support demand Our partner survey revealed the following ranking for support demand: Stages
Areas
Forms
1
Settling in (25%)
Destination (26%)
Media (36%)
2
Pre-departure (21%)
Life abroad (24%)
Personal support* (34%)
3
Pre-decision (15%)
Networking (15%)
Networks/local meetings (15%)
4
Pre-repatriation (12%)
Paid work (14%)
Networks/local meetings (15%)
5
Repatriation (11%)
Alternatives (10%)
6
Settled (10%)
Repatriation (10%)
7
Repatriated (5%)
Other (1%)
* Needs Assessment, coaching, training and support desk
According to a joint Global Connection RES Forum HR survey (n=91)*, personal support was by far the most important support form perceived by HR, while media obtained only a number 4 ranking. * See www.global-connection.info under the tab ‘For HR’
53% skipped the wish to work According to the partner survey, 53% of expat partners who intended to work abroad changed their plans once they were there. The reasons were ranked as follows: 1
The limitations of expat life (42%)
2
Option to change course (35%)
3
No suitable jobs (32%)
4
Limited number of vacation days (27%)
5
Cannot get a work permit (25%)
6
Low pay (24%)
7
Other, e.g. no part-time jobs (13%)
Interestingly, HR’s perception was that the lack of suitable jobs and work permit restrictions were the main reasons why expat partners changed their wish to work. Decreased satisfaction due to increasing demand The 24% rise in non-family-related activities of partners (from 49% in 2011 to 61% in 2013) has resulted in an increase for support demand. As most of the participating companies have not increased their support volume, the ‘support needs met’ scores have dropped by an average of 8% in those two years. Proof of ‘Gucci’ ineffectiveness (Read more on page 2) Global Connection | September 2013
1