

GiuseppeFattori
10SocialMediaandHealthPromotion
Introduction
Thedigitalrevolutionhasbroughtinnovationsandtransformationsacrossmany fieldsandthegalaxyofhealthisnoexception.Thedigitalplatformshavetransformedthewaycitizensandhealthcareprofessionalsinteractonadailybasis;used effectivelytheycanbringnewopportunitiestobuildasustainablecommunityand reorientatebehaviours.
BillionsofusersthroughInstagram,Facebook,TwitterandYouTubeinteract, sharetheircontributions,createexchangesamongpeopleandgroupsandbuilda newformofcommunicationcalledWeb2.0(Hesse2011,p.10).Internet,appsand mobilephones,togetherwiththetoolsofWeb2.0,enablebotharapidandwidespreaddisseminationoftheseachievementsin HealthPromotion, withconstantevolutionanddailyprogress.
Itisverydifficulttocrystallisethesedynamicandcontinuouslyupdatedrealities suchasWeb2.0andthenewtechnologies;itisevenmoresoifwewanttoshedlight ontheirimplicationsinacomplexanddelicatefieldsuchashealthanditspromotion.ThankstoWeb2.0,patientsalsoclaimanactiveroleandasktoparticipatein decisionsregardingtheirhealth ‘Citizenincluded’ (DeBronkart2019).Thenewprotagonistsoftheworldofhealthwillthereforebethecitizens,astheiraccesstotechnologiesandinformationwillchangethewaytheyinteractwithhealthcareprofessionals andaccessclinicalresearch.Thewaytomeetpeople’sneedsishoweverthroughcitizensparticipation:theirinvolvementisfundamentalforeffectivehealthpromotion, goingbeyondsimplyreachingthetargetaudience,toinfluencechangesinasustainablemannerandfacilitatetheco-creationofnewbehaviours(Kite2016).
Byreachingawideaudience socialmedia canreducesocialinequalities(Ramanadhan2013,p.1129)andincreasetheeffectivenessofhealthpromotionprograms aimingatchangingbehaviours(Laranjo2015,p.243).Socialnetworkingplatforms haveincreasedpeersupport(Farmer2009,p.455)andhelpedmarginalizedanddisadvantagedpopulationswithlowliteracylevels(Veinot2011,p.1146).Citizenparticipationinhealthpromotionprogramsisfarfromeasy,theirengagementhowever greatlyincreasesthechancesofsuccess(Evans2016).
Healthpromotionusesthreeleverstochangebehaviour: – socialmarketing; – socialmedia; – thelaws.
Wewilldiscusstherelationshipsbetweenthesetoolsandtheirimpactonpeople’s behavioursandlifestyles.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110659566-010
HealthPromotionandSocialMarketing
Healthpromotionisaglobalprocesswhi chgoesbeyondthegenericsafeguard ofhealth,butreferstoaspecificstrategywithreferencesataninternational level.Followingthisdirection,theOttawa Charter,thefinalactoftheFirstInternationalConferenceonhealthpromotion, representsastartingpoint:onthisoccasiontheconceptof healthpromotion wasrecognizedforthefirsttimeasa processallowingpeopletogaingreatercontrolovertheirownhealthandtoimproveonit.
Followsthe1988Adelaideconferenceandthe1997JakartadeclarationdevelopedontheindicationsprovidedattheOttawaconference,supportingtheimportanceofshareddecisionsandtheneedforwiderparticipationinhealthprocesses. Fosteringcitizensparticipationisrecognizedaskeycomponenttoempowertheindividualsandtheircommunitytotakeactioninpromotingthehealthoftheentire population.Anewanddifficultchallengeconsideringthatmosthealthpromotion activitieshavehad,andcontinuetohave,theobjectiveofactingoneachsingleindividual(Raphael2006,p.236).Informedandawarecitizenstodayareatalower riskofbecomingpatientstomorrow.
Furthermore,theconceptofhealthpromotioncannotbefullyunderstoodifitis notconsideredinabroaderperspective,asa program:thismeanstoradicallyreview boththestrategyforitsdevelopmentandthemeansforitsimplementation.Designingandimplementingahealthpromotionprograminvolvesputtingtogetherscientificevidence,interventionstrategiesandsustainabilityoftheresultsachieved.
Healthpromotion,definedasthescienceandarttohelppeoplechangetheir lifestylestowardsanoptimalstateofhealth,isanextremelyinclusivediscipline.It isthisflexibilitythatmakeshealthpromotionsuitableforfacingthechallengesthat newtechnologiesseteveryday.Aclearpathishoweverrequired,togetherwiththe understandingofhowtechnologiesareintegrated,sharedandimplementedinthe fieldofhealth.
Healthpromotionbegantodevelopasearlyastheeighteenthcentury,inorderto reducethecomplicationsthatplaguedworkersemployedinunhealthyenvironments. Themosteffectivepromotersofhealthweretheparishpriestsandteacherswhoused thelanguageofordinarypeopletospreadawarenessforthepreventionofcertaindiseases.Theneedtoliveinhealthisconfrontedwiththeneedoftradeandprofit:the convictiontodoawaywithsmokingcontrastswiththeinterestsofcigarettemanufacturers,aswhencenturiesagotheclosureofacity’sgatesstemmedanepidemicbut haltedcommercialtrade.
Apluralityofdisciplines,amongwhichitispossibletoincludemedicine,sociology,psychology,anthropology,communicationsciencesandsocialmarketing, haveexploreddifferentaspectsofcommunicationcampaignsonsustainablelifestyles.Thesecampaignshavethefundamentalpurposeofprovidingindividuals withtoolstogaingreatercontrolovertheircondition,actingonthedeterminantsof
health,namelythelivingconditionsofacultural,social,economicandenvironmentalnatureand,finally,onpersonalandsocialbehaviour.
Attheendofthetwentiethcenturywestartedtoconsiderhealthasphysical,social andpsychologicalwell-being,aswellasaresourceforhumanlife(Nutbeam1988, p.27).Thisapproachalsounderlineshowsocietiesfoundedonprinciplesofsocialequity,thatdevelophealthpromotionasavaluetodefend,arethemostsuccessfuland offerthosewhoarepartofit,betterlifeprospects.However,healthpoliciesneed meanstoachievetheirgoalsand,fundamentally,alsocoordinationwithinthedifferent levelsofplanningandoperations,inanorganizationalmodelinwhichmanagerialand productionresponsibilities aredefinedandassessable.
Socialmarketing isoneoftheseleversandisrapidlybecominganintegralpartof healthpromotionstrategies.Eventodaythedefinitionsof ‘healthpromotion’ and ‘socialmarketing’ arebeingdynamicallyadaptedtotakeaccountoftheinevitabledifferencesbetweenthedifferentcommunitiesandbetweenthedifferentsegmentsofthe population(Griffiths2008):a workinprogress whichperhapswillnevercometoan end,asthepointofarrivalofthetheoreticaldiscussionsisincontradictionwiththe perpetuallyevolutionarycharacterofsociety.
Thelogicalmodelsusedinplanningandevaluatinghealthpromotionandmarketinginitiativeshavebeendescribedinthedifferentphasesoftheplanning,development,implementationandevaluationprocess(Griffiths2008):
– Logicalmodelofexplanatoryfactors:onthenatureandoriginofaquestion;
– Logicalmodelofchangeprocesses:onunderstandingbehaviourchangeprocesses;
Logicalmodelofprogram/action:ontheformationofthepracticalprogram;
Logicalmodelofoutcome/evaluation:onexpectedresults.
PositioningofSocialMarketing
Socialmarketingisadisciplineinitself,distinctfromcommunication,education, commercialmarketingandothereconomicandsocialsciences,fromwhichhoweveritdrawsapproachesandcontributions.Specifically,itbegantotakeshape fromanarticlebyKotlerandZaltmanintheearly1970s.
Socialmarketingistheuseofmarketingprinciplesandtechniquestoinfluenceatargetgroup toaccept,reject,modifyorabandonabehaviourvoluntarily,inordertogainanadvantagefor individuals,groupsorsocietyinitscomplex. (Kotler1971,p.3)
Itstartsfromthefundamentaldefinitionofsocialmarketing’sanalysisoftheterminologyadoptedtoindicatethecurrentsofthoughtandactionsaimedatpromoting amorecorrectbehaviourtowardsone’sownbodyandtowardsthedeterminantsof individualandcollectivehealth.Variousauthorshavealsopaidparticularattention totheconceptof societalmarketing asalsobeingthecommitmentthataprivate companyundertakestoassuregoodenvironmentalorsocialbehaviour.
Theconceptofsocietalmarketingstatesthatthetaskofacompanyistodeterminetheneeds, desiresandinterestsofthetargetmarketsandtofulfilthemmoreeffectivelyandefficiently thantheircompetitors,inwaysthatpreserveandstrengthenthewell-beingoftheconsumer andthesociety. (Adel1974,p.316)
Theattentionoftheprivatesectortowardsitsownsocialresponsibilitycanextendbeyondthemeresaleoftheproductandinvolvesqualityassurance,healthandsafety compliancy,acceptablecosts,aproductionchainthatdoesnotexcessivelydamagethe environment,theeliminationofharmfulmaterials,thenon-exploitationofchildlabour andenergysavings.Theextentinwhichtheseelementsareadoptedcangreatlyimpact onthelong-termpositioningofacompanyinthemarketastheyreflectitssocialrole andresponsibility.
Insocialmarketing,therefore,thesystematicapplicationoftheconceptsof marketinganditstechniqueshasasitsgoaltheimprovementofthegeneralquality oflife,payingparticularattentiontothemostvulnerablesectionsofthepopulation: strategiesthatarenot ‘random’,butattentivetotheWeakintermsofeconomic,socialandculturalcapitaltopromotegreaterhealthequalityamongpeople.
Itisopportunetohighlighttheroleof thepartners duringtheprocess:local authorities,institutions,theworldofhealth,theenvironment,sport,volunteers, entrepreneurs,tradeassoci ations,tradeunions,individualcitizenswhocontributetogether,ifinvolved,tothedefiniti onandtherealizationoftheconceptof ‘ well-being ’ ,alsothroughthemodificationofbehavioursandoftheestablished healthobjectives.
Socialmarketingaimedattheadoptionofhealthylifestylesthereforeintendsto encouragetheconceptofsharingbetweencitizensandthecommunitywithinthe territoryinwhichthepromoterorganizationoperates,ofawiderrangeofalternativebehavioursthatguaranteemoreappropriate,freeandmindfulchoicesthataffecttheirstateofhealthandwhichisdefinedascommunityempowerment(Freire 2018).Empowermentmeansasocialprocessthatpromotestheparticipationofindividuals,organizationsandcommunitieswiththeaimofincreasingindividual,socialandpoliticalcontroloverhealth,improvingthequalityoflifeandsocialequity (Griffiths2008).
Healthpromotionandsocialmarketingcanguaranteestrategiesandpractices toimprovecommunityhealthinaneffectivewaythroughtheempowermentofcitizens(bottom-up);however,empowermentinterventionsmustbecomparedwith theobjectivesdefinedbytheinstitutionsforissuessuchashealthandtheenvironmentthatarisefromtop-downpolicies.
Laveracketalmakethetwomodesofinterventioncoexistbyintegratingina sustainablemannertheprogramsandthetop-downobjectiveswiththebottom-up requestsandneedsinthefieldof paralleltracking (Laverack2019).Paralleltracking shiftsourfocusfromthetop-down/bottom-updichotomybylinkingpublichealth andempowermentinallphasesoftheprogrammingcycle:goalsetting,strategic approach,management,implementationandevaluation.
Thepathwayforthedefinitionofsocialmarketinganditsstrongcharacterizationinthefieldofhealthpromotion(understood,asalreadyunderlined,astheoutcomeofapluralityofphysical,environmentalandculturaldeterminants)canbe facilitatedbyitspositioning(Maibach2002,p.437)ina ‘BehaviourManagement Continuum’ thatconsistsofthreelevers,alternativeorintegrated:communication, socialmarketingandlaws,allaimedatproposingahealthylifestyle.
Theleversofinfluenceontheproposedlifestyles(socialmedia,socialmarketing,regulatoryinterventions)canbedistinguishedwithrespecttotheattitudeof therecipients:
– inthecaseofwillingrecipientsmotivatedtowardsaspecificbehaviour,coupled withweakcompetition,communicationthrough socialmedia maybesufficient toperceivetheadvantagesandmotivateaction;
– whenobstaclestochangepresentthemselves,inasituationthatcanbedefinedasintermediatebetweenpropensityandresistance,aswellaswithpresentandactivecompetition,itisusefultoresortto socialmarketing ,amore refineddevelopmentofthesystem,tohelphighlighttheadvantagesofadoptingaspecificactionandreducingitsbarrierstoadoption.Considerthatthe interventionscanbestructural:ifthe consumptionoffruitandvegetablesis low,itiscertainlyimportanttocommunicatetheadvantagesofamorevaried andbalancednutrition,butitmaybenecessarytoincreasethepossibilitiesof accesstosuchfoodsthrough,forexample,thediversificationoftheofferof vendingmachines,widelypresentinplacesoflifeandwork(Fattori2009, p.149);
– incasesofgreaterresistanceonthepartoftherecipientsandofasituationin whichcompetitionisunmanageablethechoicefallsona regulatoryapproach to reducethesocialcostsofabehaviourthatisbeingrepressed.Themoredifficult itistoinducechange,themorethelegislativesanctionswillbeused:asmoking campaignwillbeaccompaniedbypenaltiesforfailuretocomplywiththerules, whileviolenceagainstwomenorsexualorethnicminoritiesmayleadtoimprisonmentoftheoffender.
Insupportofthisreflectionitisopportunetopointoutthatthedifferentlevelsof changecanbe:
– cognitive (informationcampaignsthatincreasethedegreeofawarenessona specificissue,suchasracism,nutritionalvalues,etc.);
– action (initiativesthataimtohaveconcreteactiontakeninacertainperiodof time,favouringanamortizationofthecoststhatthereferencepopulationwill face;forexample,inthefieldofvaccination,orbloodandorgandonation);
– behavioural (towhichsocialmarketingprojectsaim,insearchofstablechanges inindividualandcollectivehealthbehavioursthatbenefittheindividual,societyandtheenvironment.Considertheapplicationontopicssuchasdrugs,alcohol,smoking,contraception,wasterecycling,violenceagainstwomen);
– values (changesinmoralopinions,suchasracial,sexual,religiousprejudices) dependingonthelevelofpenetrationthatonewantstoachieveintheconscienceoftherecipients(Lee2019).
Thefieldsinwhichsocialmarketinghasthegreatestuseare(Hastings2018)above allenvironmentalones(airandwaterquality,natureprotection,recycling,renewableenergysources,sustainableurbanplanning),thoseofpurelysocialinitiatives (goingtothepolls,preventionofdomesticviolence,volunteering,facilitatingaccesstoinformationandservicesfortheweakestsectionsofthepopulation),public health(HIV/AIDS,alcohol,smoking,obesity,tuberculosis,unwantedpregnancies) andaccidentprevention(roadaccidents,accidentsintheworkplace).
HealthandWeb2.0
Withthebirthofsecond-generationwebservices,commonlyknownasWeb2.0,avirtuallyunlimitedpossibilityofinteractionandsharingwasprovided,especiallythanks totheuseofsocialnetworks(Instagram,Facebook,Twitter,ForumandBlog)andof mobiletechnologies.Thistechnologicalandinformationrevolutionhasalsolargelyinvolvedthefieldofhealthanditspromotion:themethodoftransmissionofknowledge betweenusersandprofessionalshas radicallychanged(McDaid2011).
Theinnovationscitedhavecontributedtothespreadofsocialmediainhealth promotion.Socialmediasignificantlyfacilitatetheexchangeofdataandexperiences regardingone’shealth.Itisatthisleveloftheprocessthatthepromotionshouldbe inserted:informativechangedictatedbytechnologicalinnovationsandbythenetworkcannotfailtocorrespondtoadifferentwayofpromotinghealthwhichtakes intoaccountthenewscenario.
Ifthegoalofahealthpromotioncampaignistoinformandraiseawarenessin individualsaboutaspecificprobleminordertocreatethenecessaryconditionsto changeideasandbehaviours,itisnecessarynotonlytousethemostsuitablemessages,butalsotochoosethemostappropriateandeffectivechannelsandmeans. Untilnow,healthpromotioncampaignshavebeenbasedontraditionaltoolsand haveusedveryfewnewhigh-involvementtechnologiessuchassocialmediaand mobileapplications.
Itisunlikelyhoweverthatthesamemessagecaneffectivelyreachaheterogeneoustargetwhichincreasinglyrequirestargetedandengagingcontent.Theuseof newmedia,inparticularofWeb2.0tools,cansignificantlyhelptoeffectivelyreach thetargetaudience;itisthereforenecessarytofavouranewideaofpromotionthat takesintoaccountandvalorisessynergisticallythegreatpotentialthattechnologyoffersus.Itisnecessarytoreaffirmthatinnovationistheonlywaytoredesignanorganizedhealthsystembasedonthecitizens’ newrequestforhealthandwell-being.
Newparadigmsinthefieldofhealthenterthescene;publicandprivateinnovatorsconnectandconsultwitheachother,givingaconcretedemonstrationofhow thecitizensandtheirneedsmustbeplacedatthecentreofthesystem.
Theintroductionoftheinternetinthefieldofhealthhashadadisruptiveeffect asithascreatedaveritabledividebetweentheconceptofclassichealthandwhat wecouldcallHealth2.0today:healthpromotionmustalsotakethisrevolutioninto account.Asearlyas2006KerryE.Everswasoneofthefirstauthorsinliteratureto addressthisinterestingsubjectmatter.Inthearticle ‘eHealthpromotion:theuseof theInternetforhealthpromotion’ theuseoftheInternetforthepromotionofhealth and,inparticular,thereproducibility,andtheevaluationstrategiesforonlineinterventionsareanalysed(Evers2006,p.1).
Evers’ worklaidthefoundationsforwhatwouldhavebecometheevolutionof healthpromotioninthefollowingyears:shiftingmoreandmoretowardse-health promotioninterventions.PeterKorpalsosupportedEvers’ ideasin2006inthestudy ‘HealthontheInternet:ImplicationforHealthPromotion’ whichfocusesinparticular ontheconceptofempowerment(Korp2006,p.78).
ThankstotheadventoftheInternet,informationiseasiertoaccess,moresocial contactsandnetworksarecreated,thecitizensaremoreinformedabouttheirhealth. However,thereisnoshortageofproblematicaspectssuchasthedigitaldivide,the assessmentandreliabilityofsources,thestrongcontroloftechniciansandexperts, anexcessiveincreaseinmedicalizationandhealth.Thetaskofagoodhealthpromoter,therefore,istodesignstrategiesthatareabletostrengthentheusers’ abilityto evaluatethevarioussourcesofinformationinrelationtotheirinterestsandneeds, ratherthaninrelationtoscientificand/orprofessionalstandards.
Withthespreadoftheinternet,therefore,eHealthentersthescenewitheHealth Promotion.ProgramsbasedoneHealthpromotionautomatedatacollectionsandensuregreaterinteractivityandflexibility.EffortsmustthereforebefocusedoncombininghealthpromotionwitheHealth.InarecentreportbytheEuropeanCommunity Commission,eHealthisdescribedasausefultoolforbothhealthprofessionalsand patients.
Inreferencetointeractivecommunicationtechnologies(Ratzan2011,p.1)we areexperiencinganeraofopportunitiesneverbeforeexperienced.So-called participatorytechnologies,suchasWeb2.0anditsextensions,mustbewellexploitedand usedbybothpotentialpatientsandstakeholders.Thankstotheever-increasing digitalhealth,wearenowabletodevelopeffectivecommunicationstrategiesforhealth inpreventing,helpingandsupportingpatientswherevertheylive.
Ofallthetoolsintroducedinrecentyears,undoubtedlyappsandsocialmedia aretheonesthathavehadthemostsignificantimpactinhealthcare.Somuchso thatwecantalkaboutapreandpostWeb2.0,aswellasapreandpostandHealth.LeeAase,inthetext ‘ BringingtheSocialMediaRevolutiontoHealth Care ’ ,isoneofthefirsttobelieveinthepowerofsocialmediainhealthcare (Aase2016).
Hospitalsmustfaceandmanagethisradicalchangebylearningtousethese toolsofdialoguewithcommunities,redesigningtheirorganization,encouraging participation,buildinganetworkofprofessionals,sharingideas.Apioneerinthe useofsocialmediainmedicineisBertalanMeskò,founderof Webicina andauthor of ‘SocialMediainClinicalPractice’ (Meskò2013).AccordingtoMeskò,socialmedia havechangedtheworldofhealthcare.Web2.0,internet,socialmediaarerepresentationsofthesameconcept:digitalcommunication.
Socialmediacanfacilitatecommunication,doctor/patientinteraction.TheultimategoalisnotthateveryhealthcareprofessionalbecomesabloggeroraTwitter expertbutthateachofthemcanchoosetheplatforms,tools,solutionsthatfacilitate theirownandpersonalcommunicationflowwithpatients,withcommunities.
AnimportantmedicalassociationliketheASCO(AmericanSocietyofClinical Oncology),throughitsportalhelpsoncologiststounderstandanduseTwitter,supportingmutualenrichmentforthosespecialistswho,thankstosocialmedia,can betterconferwithcolleagues,patientsandcaregivers.
Thethemeisthereforeverycurrent,especiallyifmobileapplications,which haveoflatebecomeprotagonistsintheeHealthfield,comeintoplay.Flexibility, innovativenessandeasyintegrationwithallportabledevices(smartphones,tablets) havemadethemthecornerstonesofthenewconceptofelectronichealth.Inthe sameappwefindpreventionandhealth; mobilehealth isnolongersimplyaphenomenon,butarealitywithwhichwemustconfrontourselvesinasocietythathas discoveredtheincrediblepotentialofsmartphonesandtabletsanddoesnotwant (andperhapscannot)dowithoutthemanymore.
Theappsavailabletodayinthehealthareaaredividedmainlyintofivemacroareas:diet,exercise,healthandpersonalcare,sexualityandsleepdisorders.Allthe applicationsallowagreaterdiffusionofinformationamongthepopulationandmake userspronetotheimplementationofcertainbehaviours.Alongsideresearchthatsuggeststheuseofappsandlooksuponthempositively,therearestillstudiesthatshow criticism.AnarticlepublishedbytheJournalofMedicalInternetResearch ‘There’san appforthat:contentanalysisofpaidhealthandfitnessapps’ analysedsomesmartphoneapplicationsdedicatedtohealth,inparticularfitness,assessingthepotential impactofeachinbehaviouralchange.Acriticallookthatunderlineshowfewapplicationsaredevelopedrespectingthemostconsolidatedtheoriesofhealthpromotion (West2012,p.12).
Currentlyacademicliteraturepresentslittleanalysisontheuseofappsinhealth promotion(Hasman2011,p.322).ThepotentialoftheInternetbegantobeunderstoodattheendofthenineties;today,healthcarecompanies,hospitals,researchinstitutes,shouldpresideovertheplacesinwhichpatientsexchangeinformationand supporteachother,whileembracingandfacingthesocialrevolution.Atthisfurther levelthestrategybecomesafocalpoint.
SocialmediaareInternet-basedtoolsthatarecreatedandexploittheideologicalandtechnicalpremisesofWeb2.0andallowtheproductionandexchangeof
‘usergeneratedcontent’ (Kaplan2010,p.59).Adaptingtothesechangesbecomes essential,especiallyifwetalkabouthealth.Thecomplexityofthecommunication, theinteractionsandtheimplicationsthatcanbegeneratedthroughthedirectcontactofhealthprofessionalswiththeuser/patientmustberecognized.
WiththeunionbetweenWeb2.0andhealth,anewresearchsectoriscreated, inwhichhealthpromotionplaysacentralrole.
Giventhecomplexityofthetopic,theintentistotraceanddescribeapaththat startsfromtheconceptofhealthpromotionandendsineHealth,passingthrough Web2.0andsocialmedia.
ItwouldbeuselesstotalkaboutHealthPromotionanditsdevelopmentsifthe competencessharedatinternationallevelwerenotestablishedandpossessedby allthosewhowishtooperateinthesector.Inthisdirection,theproject Developing CompetenciesandProfessionalStandardsforHealthPromotionCapacityinEurope (CompHP)whichseestheparticipationof24countriesaroundtheworldcoordinatedbytheEuropeanOfficeofInternationalUnionforHealthPromotionandEducation(IUPHE),aimstoidentifythebasiccompetencesofoperators(healthand non-health)forhealthpromotion(Speller2012).Theprojectproposessomerelevant objectivesfortheprofessionaldevelopmentoftheHealthPromotionsectorand presentsitsprofessionalstandards.Thedocumentdescribestheprograms,policies andotherhealthpromotioninterventions.
EthicalvaluesarefundamentalforactionsinHealthpromotionandformthecontextinwhichallotherskillsarepracticed.Theyinclude:equity,socialjustice,respect forautonomyandthechoiceofindividualandgroupworkprocessesbasedoncollaborationandconsultation.TheninestandardsidentifiedbytheCompHPProjectare:
– Promote behaviourchangethrough empowerment andcitizenparticipation;
– Improve healthandwell-beingbyfacilitatingcommunitiesandgroupstoarticulatetheirneedsandsupportthedevelopmentofpoliciesandproceduresinall sectorswhichhaveapositiveimpactonhealth;
– Mediate throughpartnership,buildsuccessfulpartnershipsthroughcollaborativeworkandfacilitatethedevelopmentandsustainabilityofcoalitionsandnetworksforhealthpromotionaction; – Communicate healthpromotionactionsthroughtechniquesandtechnologies suitableforaheterogeneouspublic;
–
Leadership,throughworkwithstakeholderstoagreeonasharedvisionand strategicdirection;
– Analyse theneedsandresourcesincollaborationwithstakeholders,withinthe frameworkofpolitical,economic,social,cultural,environmental,behavioural andbiologicaldeterminants;
– Plan throughthedevelopmentofhealthpromotionobjectivesthatarebothmeasurableandbasedontheassessmentofneedsandactivitiesincollaborationwith stakeholders.Mobilize,supportandinvolvetheparticipationofstakeholdersin theplanningofhealthpromotionactions;
–
Implement effectiveandefficientactionsincollaborationwithinterestedparties;
– Evaluate theimpactandeffectivenessofhealthpromotionactions.
Inhealthpromotion,socialmediacanbeusedasamediumtopromotecitizen empowerment,improvehealthandwell-being,mediatethroughpartnerships,communicate,analyse/collectdata,implement,evaluateandresearch.
FromSocialNetworkstoSocialMedia
Thehistoryofsocialnetworksbeginslongbeforetheinternet,Euler ’sworkand hisgraphtheorythatunderliestheentiretheoryofnetworksoftodaydatesback to1736.Thesocialnetworkismadeupofagroupofpeopleconnectedtoeach otherthroughdifferentkindsofrelationsh ips(personal,professional,religious, etc.).Sincetheseearlystudies,socialnetworkshaveneverstoppeddeveloping;in theearly2000s,thefirstcollaborativeservicessuchasWikipedia,YouTubeand Facebookappearedonthescene.
Web2.0wasrisingfromtheashesofthe2001crisis.Startingfromtheearly yearsofthenewmillennium,thesocialnetworktimelinehasbeenacceleratingvery fast:in2003LinkedInwasintroduced,in2004Facebookwentonline,in2005YouTube,in2006aminimalistmicrobloggingservicelikeTwitterwaslaunched,Instagramin2010.
Thenetworkinteractionmode(profile,connectionorfriendship,message,status, comment,etc.)hasquicklyestablisheditself,becomingthestandardwithwhichpeoplehavebecomeaccustomedtointeract.Takingastepforward,SocialNetworksare oneofthekeyelementsofabroader ‘revolution’ thatshouldbepigeonholedunder thenameofSocialMedia.Thistermmeansagroupoftechniquesandrulesforcreatingandsharingonlinecontent.Itisachangeofroles:theusersalsobecomeproducersofcontent.
Bettermanagingsocialmediameansdevelopingmulti-channeldigitalcampaigns withsocialmedia,websites,apps,mobile,wearabletechnologywheresocialmediais integratedwithtraditionalcommunicationtools.Nowwewilltrytodefinethescope ofactionandlearnaboutthesocialmediamostinusetoday.
SocialMedia
Socialmediaisaconstellationoftoolsandtechnologiesthatenablepeer-to-peer conversationsandco-creation.Eachofthesetoolshasdifferentcharacteristicsand findsdifferentapplicationswithrespecttohealthpromotion.Tothisend,social mediahavebeendividedinto(DeAngelis2018,p.1):
– collaborativeprojectssuchas Wikipedia:thesearewebsitesthatallowusersto add,removeandmodifytext-basedcontentandenablethejointandsimultaneouscreationofcontentbymanyendusers;
– contentcommunitiessuchas Youtube, Instagram and Podcast:theseallowusers tosharemultimediacontentsuchasvideos,photosandaudio; – blogandmicrobloggingsuchas Twitter: thesearespecificwebsitesthatprovideinformationindifferentformats,particularlyappreciatedbyprofessionalnetworks;
socialnetworksuchas Facebook: theseareapplicationsthatallowuserstoconnectbycreatingpersonalinformationprofiles,invitingfriendsandcolleaguesto accesstheseprofilesandexchanginge-mailsandinstantmessages;
– virtualworldssuchas Secondlife:theseareplatformsthatreplicateathreedimensionalenvironmentinwhichuserscanappearintheformofpersonalized avatarsandinteractwitheachotherasinreallife;
– discussion forums:theseallowparticipantstoconverseusingpostedmessages; theyhavebeenconsideredaformofsocialmediaastheyincorporateusergeneratedcontent.
Socialmediaisnotjustameansofentertainment,itisnowpartofourlives.Itis thereforenecessarytoadoptaprofessionalapproachtosocialmediaandadopta socialmediastrategy.
Socialmediastrategiescanbetracedbacktosomemorecommontypes:
– Monitoringstrategies aimtoestablishasmuchaspossibleabroadandsolidparticipationofthecompanyintermsofcontentandwithoutapredefineddeadline. Thesearecostlystrategiesbothintermsofeconomicsandresources(dedicated staff,etc.).Onceadopted,suchstrategiesrequireaninnovativeandprecisemetricsystemtocalculatetheROI(ReturnonInvestment).AservicelikeFacebook lendsitselfwelltodevelopingsuchastrategy;
– Promotion strategiesarethoseundertakenbycompaniestosupportthelaunch ofacampaignorinitiative.Oftenthesestrategiesaresupportedbyasignificant investmentonaverage.Theyaretargetedstrategiesandhavetimelimits
– Project strategiesarealwaysofatemporarycharacterbutarelesslimitedtoa specificsubject/topic.Theorganizationtendstoworkonthespecificobjective tobeachieved.Suchstrategiescanonlysucceediftheyareaddressedtotheappropriatecommunity.
– Listening strategiesarethewayforthosecompaniesthathave,bychoiceorby waiting-and-seeing,decidedtoonlyconfrontsocialmedia ‘passively’.Thelimits oflistening-onlystrategiesareobviousbecausetheydonotusesocialmediafor communication.Inanycase,theydonotprecludethepossibilityofintervening atalatertimeandrepresentanoptionthat,ifmanagedwell,canbeuseful.
Inhealthpromotion,preciseindicationstodeterminestrategicobjectivescannotbe ignored.Theimportanceofestablishingprioritiesandobjectivesisalsoemphasized
byLeeAaseoftheMayoClinicCenterforSocialMediainthesevenpointstobeconsideredforasocialmediastrategy(Aase2016):
– Startfromprioritiesandgoals;
– Becomefamiliarwiththetools;
– Startastrategyfromobservationandlistening;
– Askforhelp;
– Payattentiontothecommunityrules;
– Don’tbeoverwhelmedbypurists;
– Rememberthatplanningismoreimportantthanplans.
Socialmediachangesthewaypeoplecommunicateandorganizationalgoalsneedto beredesignedtoengagepeople.Furthermore,thechoiceofthereferencetargetwill influencethechoiceofthechannel.Spendingtimedevelopingandmaintainingsocialmediapresencewillbeunproductiveifwedonotdecidehowtousethechosen channel.
Inparticular,wemustdefinetheobjectives(forexample,promotethecompany orcreateapersonalonlinepresence)anddesignagoodstrategybasedonourneeds: Twitter,forexample,canbeusedforbriefconversations,whileblogsarepreferable forsharingopinions,essaysandpresentations.
Someimportantindications(Meskò2013):
– Donotmixprofessionalandpersonallifeonline;
– Beopentodiscussions;
– Communicateasyouwouldinreallife;
– Beconsistent;
– Alwaysshowintellectualrigorandbecommitted.
SocialMediaandHealthPromotion
TheguidelinesoftheCentersforDiseaseControlandPreventionofAtlanta(CDC 2011)proposetheinnovativeuseofSocialMediainhealthpromotion.Inthisdirection,socialmediaandmobilecommunicationtechnologiesfavour:
– theimmediacyofinformation; – sharingcontentwithpartners; – personalizationofmessages;
– facilitatingtheintegrationbetweendifferentorganizationsandinstitutions;
– supporttowardthechoicetoadopthealthybehaviours.
Socialmediadonoteliminatethedisparitiesbetweengroupsbutduetothelow costandthegrowingspreadoftheInternettheycanreducetheinequalitiescaused bythedigitaldivideandthedifferentlevelsofhealthliteracy(Bodie2008,p.175). PopularplatformslikeFacebookInstagramorTwitterhaveallowedamyriadofnew
voicestoemergeinthesocialmediaspherewhereindividualscanbeequallyas presentasbigcompanies,researchersandgovernments.
Theevolutionofthemediaintroducesnewproblemsduetothetruthfulnessof thedata,tofakenewsandtoprivacyissues.Healthpromoterscannolongerbase theirauthorityonlyonsocialpositionassocialmediaoffersthepublicequalor greatermeansthanprofessionalstoactoncontroversialissuessuchasvaccinations oralternativemedicine.
ByintegratingWeb2.0intohealthpromotiondynamics,theaspectofevaluationisrelevant.Intheplanningphase,thereasonforwhichyouintendtousethat particularsocialnetworkandtorecognizethecontributionthatthelattercanoffer intheadoptionofhealthylifestylesshouldbeestablished.
Despitetheincreasinguseofsocialmedia,westillhavealongwaytogoregardingtheappropriatenessoftheirusetopromotehealthandontheirevaluation.In ordertoexaminethisdimensionindepth,thefollowinghavebeenevaluated(Neiger 2012,p.159): – thepurposeofsocialmediainhealthpromotion; – thepotentialKPI(KeyPerformanceIndex)associatedwiththesepurposes; – evaluationmetricsforsocialmediarelatedtoKPI.
Experiences
Socialmediaareextremelywidespread,buttherapidityinwhichtheychange makesitdifficulttoevaluatethemwithincomplexpublichealthissues.Wehave selectedvariousprojects,eachoneforitsdistinctivefeatures,thathavechosen differentplatformsofsocialmediaforhealthpromotionbutarealwayslinkedto sharedpublichealthobjectives.
Addressingat-riskpopulationsamongInt ernetusersisparticularlyimportant becausethoseseekingsexontheInternetmaybemoresusceptibletoHIV.This 12-weekinterventionshowedthatparti cipantswhoreceivedinformationonHIV preventionviaFacebookweremorelikel ytorequireHIVtestingthanthosewho hadreceivedgeneralhealthinformation. Theseinterventions,throughthepeer figureoftheonlinecommunity,haveallowedtheuseofcondomstoincrease andthenumberofunprotectedsexualrelationstodecrease.CommunitiesonsocialnetworksareconsideredeffectivetoolstoincreasetherequestforHIVtestingamongat-riskpopulations(Young2013,p.318).
SocialNetworkingTechnologiesasanEmergingToolforHIV Prevention
Onthesubjectofobesity,asofMarch2010,morethan12,000videoshavebeenfound andthemostpopularofthesehavebeenviewedmorethan9milliontimesbyYouTube users.ThesearchontheYouTubesitewasdoneinMarch2010usingthekeywords ‘obesity’ and ‘obese’.Researchthroughthekeyword ‘obesity’ produced38,000results, whilethosewiththeword ‘obese’ 37,500.
Obesepeopleareassociatedwithnegativecharacteristicsmuchmorethannormal-weightonesandaresubjecttomanymorenegativejudgmentsand/orstigmatizations.IneverysinglevideocategoryofYouTube,unhealthynutritionandasedentary lifestylehavebeenportrayedasthemaincausesofobesity.
Thevideosthemselves,inallthedifferentformats,havethereforerecommended thatthebestsolutiontocombatobesityistomodifyindividualbehavioursdoing physicalactivityorhavingahealthydiet(Yoo2012,p.86).
RemoteandWeb2.0InterventionsforPromotingPhysical Activity
Doinganinsufficientamountofphysicalactivityleadstoanincreasedriskofchronic diseasesandbothphysicalandmentalproblems.Regularphysicalactivitycanproducesocial,physicalandemotionalbenefitsandassuchshouldbeagoalforall adults.Fromatotalof11studies,5,862apparentlyhealthyadultswererecruited,and itemergedthattheuseoftechnologyisappreciatedwhensupportingadultstobecomemoreactive,followaweeklyrecommendedfitnessplanorbeinbettershape. Changescanbeobtainedwiththehelpfromaprofessionalandthroughpersonalsupportbyphone,e-mailorwritteninformation(Foster2013).
Traditionalhealthpromotioninterventionscannotproduceimprovementsinthe lifestylesofthepopulationasmuchasinterventionsbasedontheuseoftheInternet,whichinsteadcanbewidelydisseminatedatareducedcost.
Onlinecommunities,likethoseforwalkingprograms,allowparticipantstocommunicatewitheachotherbysendingandreadingmessages.Allparticipants(n=324) worethepedometerforthe16weeksanduploadedthedataonline.Therecoursetothe onlinecommunityforawalkingprogramusingtheInternethasnotincreasedthenumberofstepscountedonaverage,buthasreducedtheabandonmentbytheparticipants.
Onlinecommunitiescanbeapromisingapproachtoreducingtheabandonment ofhealthactivities,particularlyinpopulationswithlowsocialsupport(Richardson 2010).
Web2.0andBeyond:RisksforSexuallyTransmittedInfections andOpportunitiesforPrevention
ThecontinualgrowthoftheInternetasameansofcommunicationhasalsohadimportantimplicationsforthetransmissionandpreventionofsexuallytransmittedinfections(STIs).Thepurposeofthisreviewistodescriberecentdevelopmentsina rapidlyevolvingfield.
ThemeetingpointbetweentheInternetandsexuallytransmitteddiseases(STDs) isdescribedinthreeperspectives:theInternetasariskenvironment,aplacewhere sexualpartnerscanberecruited;Internetasaplacewherepublichealthprevention interventionscanbeperformedaimedatpreventingsexuallytransmitteddiseasesand HIV;InternetasanincreasinglyimportantworkenvironmentforallMSTprevention disciplines.
Thereviewhighlightsrecentdevelopmentsandidentifiespotentialavenuesfor futureresearch.ThegrowinginteractivityoftheInternet,inparticularthesocial networkingsitesthatallowuserstocloselyshareunlimitedamountsofpersonalinformationwiththeirpeersonthenet,increasesthepotentialoftheInternetasan environmentbothforSTIsriskandforitsprevention(Rietmeijer2009,p.67).
Smokingcessationprogramsbasedontextmessagesfrommobilephonescanincreasesmokingcessationintheshortterm.Smokerswillingtomakeanattemptto quit(5800)wererandomlyassignedtoacontrolgroup,usinganindependenttelephonerandomizationsystem:thesmokingcessationprogramwascalled txt2stop. Themessagessentweremotivationalandbehavioural.
Onthebasisoftheresultsobtained,itisclearthatthetobaccocessationprogramtxt2stophassignificantlyimprovedthedivestmentratesoveraperiodof6 monthsandcanbeincludedintheservicesaimedattobaccocessation(Free2011, p.49).
YouthDrinkingCultures,SocialNetworkingandAlcohol Marketing:ImplicationsforPublicHealth
Millionsofpostsonnotice-boards,profilesandphotosthatgoaroundaboutalcohol playanimportantroleinthenormalizationofdrinkingalcoholwithinthelifeand cultureofyoungpeople.SocialNetworkscanbeusedpositivelyinhealthcaretoencourageyoungdrinkerstoresponsiblychangetheirhabits.
UsersofSocialNetworksontheonehandcanbenefitfromthecreationand sharingofcontent,ontheothertheyrepresentaneasytargettobereachedbyalcoholsellers.TheunregulatedandprobablyuncontrollablecharacteristicsofSocial Networksmakethempopularwithalcoholproducersastheyincreasinglybring theminclosercontactwithconsumers(McCreanor2013,p.110).
SocialMediaandOrganDonorRegistration:TheFacebookEffect
AstudypublishedintheAmericanJournalofTransplantationbyresearchersat JohnsHopkinsUniversityinBaltimoreshowedthatFacebookhaseffectivelymade citizensawareoforgandonation.OnMay1,2012,thesocialnetwork,Facebook, changeditsplatformtoallowmemberstospecifyOrganDonorstatusontheirprofile.Thischoicewassharedonthefriends’ pagevianotificationandwasfurther enhancedbysendingeducationallinksonthethemesofthedonation.
Onthefirstdayofthe ‘OrganDonor’ initiativeonFacebook,therewasanincreaseintheactualnumberofnewdonorsof21.1times,goingfromanaverageof 616dailyregistrationsto13,054.Overallintheobservationperiod(thestudylasted 13days)therewere39,818registrations,ofwhich32,958attributabletotheFacebookeffect.
Newapplicationsthroughsocialmediacanthereforeprovetobeeffectiveinincreasingorgandonationratesandsimilarlycouldbeusedinotherpublichealth fieldswherecommunicationandeducationareessential(Cameron2013,p.2059).
Prenatalexposuretoalcoholcancausearangeoflifelongphysical,behavioural, andintellectualdisabilities,collectivelyknownasfetalalcoholspectrumdisorders (FASD).FASDisrecognizedtobeaninternationalpublichealthproblem.Increasing awarenessabouttherisksofdrinkingduringpregnancyisconsideredthefirststep towardsFASDprevention.Aninternationalawarenesscampaignwasorganized, called ‘TooYoungtoDrink’ (Figure10.1).

Figure10.1: TooYoungtoDrink – Fabrica.
Source:Availablefrom:https://web2salute.com/tytd/(Viewed3July2020)
Thecampaignusedtheoreticalmodelsofsocialmarketingappliedtohealthpromotion.Theapproachaimedtospreadinformationamongthegeneralpopulation, sharingideasandusingthepoweroftheInternetandsocialmedia.Thelaunchfollowedthemethodsof ‘guerrillamarketing’.Socialmedia,mainlyFacebookandTwitter, werethedrivingforcetothediffusionofthecampaign.
Findingsfromthecampaign ‘ TooYoungtoDrink ’ showedthatitwaspossibletodevelopandcarryoutaninternationalactionplantoraisepublicawareness ofFASD,usingsocialmarketingstrategiesandsocialmediatospreadmaterials andinformationontheissueamongdifferentcultureswithalowbudget(Bazzo 2017,111).
BreastfeedingwithStart4LifeonAmazonAlexa
InEngland,breastfeedingratesareamongthelowestintheworld.75%ofwomenstart breast-feedingwhentheirbabyisborn,unfortunatelybetweenthesixthandeighth weekthisdropsto44%.Expectantmotherswhoaresupportedproperlybreastfeedlonger.England’sPublicHealthStart4Lifeprogramprovidessupportforparentstoadopt healthybehaviours.
ForthefirsttimetheAmazonAlexavoiceserviceisalsoavailable.Motherscan askAlexa(Figure10.2)aseriesofquestionsaboutbreastfeedingandtheanswers willbetailoredtotheirchild.Thismeansthattheycanreceiveusefuladvicealso throughvoicecommands(PublicHealthEngland2018).
Asurveyshowedthat24-houraccess7daysaweektobreastfeedingsupportvia aphoneline,websiteorchatbotmaymorelikelyresultin: – havingapositivebreastfeedingexperience; – decidingtotrybreastfeeding(59%); – breastfeedinglonger(58%).

Source:Availablefrom:https://twitter.com/PHE_uk/status/970628333665968128?s=20 (Viewed3July2020)
#FridaysForFuture ‘OurHouseisonFire’
#FridaysForFutureisaverypresenttopiconsocialmedia,youngpeoplehaveused Instagram,Facebook,TwitterandYouTubetosupporttheircause.Socialmedia havefacilitatedknowledgeofclimatechangeandmobilizationofactivistsbyprovidingplatformsfordiscussionandsharing(Thunberg2019).
Theabilityoftheseplatformstospreadvideos,imagesandtextandtobeonline haveenabledthecreationofaworldwidemovement.Youngpeopleaskedtostep upactionstotackleglobalclimatechangeandusedsocialmediatopromoteoffline activities.
Socialmediacangivevisibilitytosocialissuesandhavearealeffectonpublic opinion.TheGlobalStrikeForFuturetookplaceonFriday,15March2019,with theparticipationof1.5millionstudentsinmorethan2,083citiesin125countries (Figure10.3).
TheTechnological(andSocial)Revolution
Throughsocialmedia,humanrelationships,conversationsandinformationovercomespace-timebarriers:inadditiontothetechnologyrevolution,wearefacinga
Figure10.2: Start4LifeBreastfeeding.

Figure10.3: Schoolstudentsgoonstrikeoverthelackofactiononclimatechange. Source:Availablefrom:https://twitter.com/GretaThunberg/status/1106638130290049024?s=20 (Viewed3July2020)
socialrevolution.Anewworldtoknowandtointerpret;beyondtheobstaclesto innovation,weseeenormousopportunitiesforsocialmediaandhealthpromotion.
Thenewhealthprofessionaliswitnessingthemostimportantrevolutionofall time;rules,hierarchies,skillschange.Allatasurprisingspeed. ‘Dr.Google’ is changingthepatientmedicalrelationshipandtherelationshipsbetweencitizens. Socialmediapromoterscandevelopstrategiestoengagethepublicandencourage learning(Norman2009).
Evenwhensocialmediaiseffectiveinproducingpositivehealthoutcomeswe mustcontinuallyfollowitsevolutionandchangetheapproachofoperatorsandpolicymakerstoadapttothesenewrealities.Allsectorsofsocietyareinvolvedandwe havealsoseenthathealthpromotersaredefiningwhichskillsandvaluestoadopt internationally.
Inthepreviousstorieswehavedescribedsocialmediaexperiencesforhealthpromotion.Todaywehaveanewally,aprotagonistwhowantstositatthetableof ‘rules’ tohelpdefinehisfuture, PatientDave whotellsus ‘nothingaboutmewithout me’;thecompetentcitizenisinterestedinparticipatingin ‘Citizenincluded’ research andprevention.
References
Aase,L.,Goldman,D.,(2016). BringingtheSocialmediaRevolutiontoHealthCare [online].Mayo FoundationforMedicalEducationAndResearch.[Viewed3July2020].Availablefrom:https:// cdn.prod-carehubs.net/n1/73faa102fe023137/uploads/2015/05/Bringing-the-Social-MediaRevolution-to-Health-Care.pdf
Adel,I.,Ansary,E.,(1974).TowardsaDefinitionofSocialandSocietalMarketing. Journalofthe AcademyofMarketingScience 2(1–4),316–321.
Bazzo,S.,Black,D.,Mitchell,K.,Marini,F.,Moino,G.,Riscica,P.,Fattori,G.,(2017).TooYoungTo Drink.Aninternationalcommunicationcampaigntoraisepublicawarenessoffetalalcohol spectrumdisorders. PublicHealth. 142,111–115.
Bodie,G.,Dutta,M.J.,(2008).Understandinghealthliteracyforstrategichealthmarketing:ehealth literacy,healthdisparities,andthedigitaldivide. HealthMarketingQuarterly 25,175–203. Cameron,A.M.,Massie,A.B.,Alexander,C.E.,Stewart,B.,Montgomery,A.R.,Benavides,N.R., Fleming,G.D.,Segev,D.L.,(2013).SocialMediaandOrganDonorRegistration:TheFacebook Effect.AmericanJournalofTransplantation,13:2059–2065. CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention(CDC).(2011). TheHealthCommunicator’sSocialMedia Toolkit.[Viewed3July2020].Availablefrom:https://www.cdc.gov/socialmedia/tools/guide lines/socialmediatoolkit.html
DeAngelis,G.,Wells,G.A.,Davies,B.,King,J.,Shallwani,S.M.,McEwan,J.,Cavallo,S.,Brosseau, L.,(2018).Theuseofsocialmediaamonghealthprofessionalstofacilitatechronicdisease self-managementwiththeirpatients:asystematicreview. DigitHealth. 4,1–13. DeBronkart,D.,(2019).Rememberthepatients. BMJ [online]. 18,365:l1545.[Viewed3July2020]. Availablefrom:doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1545
Evans,W.D.,(2016). SocialMarketingResearchforGlobalPublicHealth:Methodsand Technologies.London:OxfordUniversityPress. Evers,K.E.,(2006).eHealthPromotion:TheUseoftheInternetforHealthPromotion. American JournalofHealthPromotion. 4(20),1–7.
Farmer,A.D.,BrucknerHolt,C.E.,Cook,M.J.,Hearing,S.D.,(2009).Socialnetworkingsites:anovel portalforcommunication. PostgraduateMedicalJournal. 85(1007),455–459.
Fattori,G.,Artoni,P.,Tedeschi,M.,(2009).ChooseHealthinFoodVendingMachines:Obesity PreventionandHealthyLifestylePromotioninItaly.In:H.Cheng,P.Kotler,N.Lee(Eds). Social MarketingforPublicHealth:GlobalTrendsandSuccessStories.JonesandBartlettPublishers. pp.149–170.
Foster,C.,Richards,J.,Thorogood,M.,Hillsdon,M.,(2013).RemoteandWeb2.0interventionsfor promotingphysicalactivity. CochraneDatabaseofSystematicReviews.[Viewed3July2020]. Availablefrom:https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD010395. pub2/full
Free,C.,Knight,R.,Robertson,S.,Whittaker,R.,Edwards,P.,Zhou,W.,Rodgers,A.,(2011). Smokingcessationsupportdeliveredviamobilephonetextmessaging(txt2stop):asingleblind,randomisedtrial. TheLancet. 378,49–55. Freire,P.,(2018). PedagogyoftheOppressed:50thAnniversaryEdition.BloomsburyAcademic. Griffiths,J.,Blair-Stevens,C.,Thorpe,A.,(2008). Socialmarketingforhealthandspecialisedhealth promotion.London:NationalSocialMarketingCentre. Hasman,L.,(2011).AnIntroductiontoConsumerHealthAppsfortheiPhone. JournalofConsumer HealthontheInternet. 15(4),322–329. Hastings,G.,Domegan,C.,(2018). SocialMarketing:RebelswithaCause.Oxford:Routledge.
Hesse,B.W.,O’Connell,M.,Augustson,E.M.,Chou,W-Y.S.,Shaikh,A.R.,Rutten,F.,(2011). RealizingthepromiseofWeb2.0:engagingcommunityintelligence. JournalofHealth Communication 16,Suppl1,10–31.
Kaplan,A.M.,Haenlein,M.,(2010).Usersoftheworld,unite!Thechallengesandopportunitiesof SocialMedia. BusinessHorizons. 53(1),59–68.
Kite,J.,Foley,B.C.,Grunseit,A.C.,Freeman,B.,(2016).Pleaselikeme:Facebookandpublichealth communication. PLoSOne[online].[Viewed3July2020].Availablefrom:https://dx.plos.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0162765
Korp,P.,(2006).HealthontheInternet:implicationsforhealthpromotion. HealthEducation Research 21,78–86.
Kotler,P.,Zaltman,G.,(1971).Socialmarketing:anapproachtoplannedsocialchange. Journalof Marketing. 35,3–12.
Laranjo,L.,Arguel,A.,Neves,A.L.,Gallagher,A.M.,Kaplan,R.,Mortimer,N.,(2015).Theinfluence ofsocialnetworkingsitesonhealthbehaviorchange:asystematicreviewandmeta-analysis. JournaloftheAmericanMedicalInformaticsAssociation 22(1),243–256. Laverack,G.,(2019). PublicHealth:Power,EmpowermentandProfessionalPractice.RedGlobe Press.
Lee,N.R.,Kotler,P.,(2019). SocialMarketing:BehaviorChangeforSocialGood.SAGEEditor. Maibach,E.W.,Rothschild,M.L.,Novelli,W.D.,(2002).SocialMarketing.In:K.Glanz,F.M.Lewis, B.Rimer(Eds). HealthBehaviorandHealthEducation.3rded.SanFrancisco:Jossey-Bass.pp. 437–461.
McCreanor,T.,Lyons,A.,Griffin,C.,Goodwin,I.,MoewakaBarnes,H.,Hutton,F.,(2013).Youth drinkingcultures,socialnetworkingandalcoholmarketing:implicationsforpublichealth. CriticalPublicHealth. 23,110–120. McDaid,David.,Park,A.,(2011).Onlinehealth:untanglingtheweb. LondonSchoolofEconomics. [Viewed3July2020].Availablefrom:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232041614_ Online_Health_Untangling_the_Web Mesko,B.,(2013). Socialmediainclinicalpractice.London:Springer-Verlag. Neiger,B.L.,Thackeray,R.,VanWagenen,S.A.,West,J.H.,Barnes,M.D.,Fagen,M.C.,(2012).Useof SocialMediainHealthPromotion:Purposes,KeyPerformanceIndicators,andEvaluation Metrics. Healthpromotionpractice. 3,159–64. Nutbeam,D.,(1988).Evaluatinghealthpromotion:progress,problemsandsolutions. Health PromotionInternational 13,27–44. Norman,C.D.,(2009).Healthpromotionasasystemsscienceandpractice. Journalofevaluationin clinicalpractice. 15,868–872. PublicHealthEngland(2018).Latesttechnologysupportsnewmumstobreastfeed.[Viewed 3July2020].Availablefrom:https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-technologysupports-new-mums-to-breastfeed Ramanadhan,S.,Mendez,S.R.,Rao,M.,Viswanath,K.,(2013).Socialmediausebycommunitybasedorganizationsconductinghealthpromotion:acontentanalysis. BMCPublicHealth. 13 (1):1129.
Raphael,D.,Bryant,T.,(2006).Maintainingpopulationhealthinaperiodofwelfarestatedecline: politicaleconomyasthemissingdimensioninhealthpromotiontheoryandpractice. Promotion&Education 13,236–42. Ratzan,S.C.,(2011).Web2.0andHealthCommunication. JournalofHealthCommunication 16,1–2. Richardson,C.R.,Buis,L.R.,Janney,A.W.,Goodrich,D.E.,Sen,A.,Hess,M.L.,Mehari,K.,(2010).An onlinecommunityimprovesadherenceinaninternet-mediatedwalkingprogram.Part1: resultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial. JournalofMedicalInternetResearch. 12(4),e71.
Rietmeijer,C.A.,McFarlane,M.,(2009).Web2.0andbeyond:risksforsexuallytransmitted infectionsandopportunitiesforprevention. CurrentOpinioninInfectiousDiseases. 22,67–71. Speller,V.,Parish,R.,Davison,H.,Zilnyk,A.,(2012). TheCompHPProfessionalStandardsfor HealthPromotionHandbook.Paris:IUHPE.[Viewed3July2020].Availablefrom:https://www. iuhpe.org/images/PROJECTS/ACCREDITATION/CompHP_standards_handbook_final.pdf Veinot,T.C.,Campbell,T.R.,Kruger,D.,Grodzinski,A.,Franzen,S.,(2011).Dramaanddanger:the opportunitiesandchallengesofpromotingyouthsexualhealththroughonlinesocial networks. AMIAAnnualSymposiumproceedings.1436–1445. West,J.H.,Hall,P.C.,Hanson,C.L.,Barnes,M.D.,Giraud-Carrier,C.,Barrett,J.,(2012).There'san appforthat:contentanalysisofpaidhealthandfitnessapps. JournalofMedicalInternet Research. 14(3),e72. Thumberg,G.,(2019).#SchoolStrike4Climate.[Viewed3July2020].Availablefrom:https://www. facebook.com/732846497083173/posts/793441724356983?sfns=mo Yoo,J.H.,Kim,J.,(2012).Obesityinthenewmedia:acontentanalysisofobesityvideoson YouTube. HealthCommunication 27,86–97.
Young,S.D.,Cumberland,W.G.,Lee,S.J.,Jaganath,D.,Szekeres,G.,Coates,T.,(2013).Social networkingtechnologiesasanemergingtoolforHIVprevention:aclusterrandomizedtrial. Annalsofinternalmedicine. 159,318–24.