Observer the
NOVEMBER 19, 2015 VOLUME XXXV, ISSUE 13
www.fordhamobserver.com
Students Call Out Systemic Racism
Photo Feature
By ANA FOTA News Co-Editor
In light of the three reported bias incidents this fall, six invited students addressed the Faculty Senate last week, saying that Fordham has a racist history, and “its present does not erase that,” according to Eric Taylor, Fordham College at Lincoln Center (FCLC) ’18. Taylor, a theatre major, cited a security guard making a lynching joke at him as he was carrying ropes on his way to rehearsal as an example of aggression on campus. Taylor was the first, out of the six students, to speak. “Fordham’s treatment of black and brown students can be called nothing other than violence,” he stated, adding, “The trauma that accompanies living under such a racist institution is damaging to the soul and to the mind. Fordham has a very dark history and its present does not erase that, the only way to move on is to acknowledge it.” “Do we want our students of color to fear for their lives?” Zann Ballsun-Simms, (FCLC) ’16, asked the audience. “The issue here is that we are terrified to talk about race,” she continued, adding, “I’m tired of not feeling safe in my own home, because Fordham is my home.” Hans Lueders, FCRH ’16, said “All these stories might seem like horror stories but they are not, they happen daily. Sometimes they happen through microaggressions and sometimes someone carves a racial slur into your door.” Leuder also said that the “burden” of advocating for change should not be placed on the shoulders of those affected by it. “That being said,” he continued, “we will continue to act because we are so invested now. We’ve seen that without student participation, nothing gets done.” Some anecdotes the students shared were based on responses to a survey they had sent out the week before, which had gotten 22 responses. The survey gave students who would not be present at see SENATE pg. 3
MARTIN NUÑEZ-BONILLA /THE OBSERVER
A vigil to comemorate the victims of the Paris attacks was held at the French Embassy in NYC on Saturday, Nov. 14.
Seeking Solidarity, After the Attacks By ALEXA MCMENAMIN Opinions Co-Editor
On Thursday, I was wrapped up in the fervor of the controversy at Mizzou when I saw a post on Facebook by a dear friend of mine about suicide bombers in Beirut, Lebanon, her hometown. Dozens were killed and hundreds injured. I became instantaneously concerned, and “liked” the post, in an effort towards solidarity. I, admittedly, did not share her post. At the time, the thought of sharing it did not occur to me, for whatever reason. In retrospect, I wonder if things would have been different if I had. On Friday night, briefly checking my phone, the first thing I saw on my News Feed was an update that a close friend, studying abroad in Paris, had checked in as “safe” on Facebook. I
had no idea what that even meant. I didn’t find out until later, seeing swaths of French flags, until the death toll rose on each following break I took, until the next morning I woke up and suddenly over a hundred had died. By now, we’ve all learned of the tragedy in Paris, with 129 dead. For many, Facebook was the primary source of information about it and played an important role in how those of us who have watched from abroad have responded. For instance, when I was able to go back Saturday morning and see my friend’s safety update in Paris again, I broke down, finally allowing myself to realize the implications of what that meant. I will forever be grateful and privileged that the first notification I got about Paris this weekend was about my friend’s safety.
Despite the solace it brought me, it has become clear that Facebook has played a toxic role in the grieving process of all involved. Because of the feature that allows individuals to overlay the French flag on their profile picture - a feature that wasn’t offered for Beirut, or for the massacre at a Kenyan university in Garissa this past April, or in the countless other strikes by militant groups - the conversation has led to people disconnected from the situation attacking each other on Facebook. Somehow, the conversation became – you changed your profile picture, so you don’t care about Beirut/Baghdad/ other deaths. This is an utterly unproductive conversation. Our profile pictures are not directly engaged in this situation; they are neither providing relief to those impacted directly by
the tragedy, nor set intentionally to silence all other tragedies. We are wasting time attacking each other, and taking criticisms of this coverage personally. The problem here is the prioritizing of some lives over others by nations and corporations with significantly more control, not innocent efforts by individuals towards solidarity. Where our personal responsibility does come in, though, is in acknowledging that we are complicit in this value system. News media has desensitized us to the loss of lives from countries outside the West. The media does not present stories of bombs in Beirut, of bombs at a memorial service in Baghdad; when they do, we are not surprised by the stories. The loss of see ATTACKS pg. 10
Inside
FEATURES
SPORTS
ARTS & CULTURE
Saving on Snacks
Students Behind the Ram
Stove’s Gets Pope
Shopping at the Ram Cafe
What it is like to be Fordham’s mascot
Comedy club to stage show in auditorium
Where you can find seasonal joy in photos
Page 14
PAGE 15
PAGE 13
PAGE 8 &9
THE STUDENT VOICE OF FORDHAM LINCOLN CENTER
PHOTO FEATURE
Holiday Cheer