Reces 5 Recess exam inesthe changing face of comedic film through the ages, INSIDE
Accessibility
f% J *
Duke students talk about life in a wheelchair on campus, PAGE 3
.JSKk
Volleyball
(
The Blue Devils take down N.C. State, 3-0, PAGE 9
The Chronicle Duke has Carolina on its mind
Ashley Dean THE CHRONICLE
by
IZA WOJCIECHOWSKA THE CHRONICLE
Good grades, high SAT scores and a well-rounded high school experience will help you get into Duke. But so will proximity. In a highly selective admission year, only 21 percent of the more than 19,300 applicants to the Class of 2010 were accepted. nctu/c
Although only 1,677
—
analysis
or about 9 percent —of the applicants were from North or South Carolina, 36 percent of Carolina applicants gained acceptance. “[The students] bring a particular cultural diversity to the University and often bring a good deal of loyalty to the University because of their regional locus,” Provost Peter Lange said. According to the undergraduate admissions website, 14 percent of this year’s freshman class is from North Carolina. But 14 percent is also from New York, Connecticut, New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine, Rhode Island and Massachusetts combined. Another 11 percent comes from 13 western states, including California, Colorado and Arizona. But the University doesn’t try to hide the skewed distribution or keep die stadstics a secret. It proudly proclaims that it gives special consideration to students from the Carolinas, traditionally reserving at least 15 percent of spots in each class for those students. James B. Duke signed the Indenture of Trust in 1924 to create the University and SEE
N.C./S.C. ON PAGE 7
Class of 2010, N.C and S.C. numbers •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
21.2% of ail applicants accepted 35.8% of
N.C./S.C. applicants accepted
31% of all applicants accepted early 34% of N.C./S.C. applicants accepted early
8.6% of all applicants from N.C./S.C. 16.5% of enrolled students from N.C./S.C. 14% of enrolled students from N.C. -27% offull-tuition scholars from N.C./S.C,
\
DSG debates off-campus infractions
N.C., S.C. students see admissions perks BY
1
ROB
GOODLATTE/THE CHRONICLE
Marc Rotenberg, who specializes in electronic privacy, speaks to a crowd of more than 300Wednesday.
Speaker discusses post-9/11 privacy by
Lucius Walker
regarding the issue of privacy.
“Last year’s series [on evolution and
THE CHRONICLE
Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, addressed privacy in the post-Sept. 11 world at the kick off to the second annual Series Provost’s Lecture
Wednesday evening. This year’s series, entitled “Privacy at Risk? My Space, the Bedroom and the NSA,” was designed to provide the background required for those on
the Duke campus and in the broader community to better engage in debate
religion] was such a success that we decided to do it again,” said Provost Peter Lange, who attended the lecture. Rotenberg’s speech was delivered in Love Auditorium to a crowd of about 300 people. Rotenberg is the co-author of “Information Privacy Law” and “Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape” and frequently testifies before Congress on emerging civil liberties issues. SEE PRIVACY ON PAGE 5
A debate arose at Duke Student Government’s Wednesday night infecting about whether the Office of Judicial Affairs has the right to punish students for off-campus behavior. Senior Maggie McGannon, vice president for student affairs, introduced a proposal that stated there should be no punish- 1 ment for minor I infracoff-campus tions—a stance that differs from that of Judicial Affairs Her proposal fol- 1 lows a presentation I made by Stephen Bryan, associate dean Maggie McGannon of students and director of judicial affairs, at the Sept. 13 DSG meeting. McGannon’s objections particularly focused on underage drinking, fake identification and noise violations. “This is our opportunity to say as students that we don’t think it’s fair for the University to punish us for these minor offenses,” she said. McGannon added that any punitive measures on the part of the University for off-campus actions breach privacy and liberty, are a response to community pressure and are based on unrealistic expectations. “I don’t expect other students to not drink underage, to not use fake IDs,” McGannon said. SEE DSG ON PAGE
6
Trojan ranks Duke Bth in sexual health BY
ZAK KAZZAZ
THE
CHRONICLE
Duke has snagged another number eight ranking —but this time it is for free condoms and STD prevention instead of class sizes and financial aid. Trojan Brand Condoms published its first annual Sexual Health Report Card last week, which was based on evaluations of 100 selected colleges and universities in the realm of sexual health. Categories such as sexual assault services, contraception and lecture outreach programs were each graded on a scale from “A” to “F” and averaged to calculate a GPA. Duke received a 3.4, making it the only southern school to receive above a 3.0.
“The inspiration [for the report card] began last year when we convened a roundtable discussion ofcollege newspaper editors to take the temperature of sexual health and of what the dialogue was taking place on campus,” said Jim Daniels, Trojan’s vice president of marketing. Duke received A’s in all the categories, with the exception of “advice column/Q and A’s,” which the University failed. Yale University topped the list with a perfect 4.0. The University of lowa and the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor rounded out the top three. The survey was also conducted in response to alarmingly high statistics SEE SEX HEALTH ON PAGE 7
Duke received a high mark in a sexual health survey thanks in part to programs that teach students how to use condoms effectively.