December 3, 2002

Page 1

Tuesday, December 3,2002

Partly Cloudy High 48, Low 23 www.chronicle.duke.edu Vol. 98, No. 69

The Chronicle »

I 1

m

Missed Chances Members of the football

team look back on a season marked by close losses and disappointment. See page 9

THE INDEPENDENT DAILY AT DUKE UNIVERSITY

Experts: Michigan Governance changes proposed cases ‘monumental’ By ALEX GARINGER The Chronicle

Affirmative action to undergo review By JENNIFER HASVOLD The Chronicle

The U.S. Supreme Court announced its long-awaited and potentially far-reaching decision yesterday to hear two cases concerning admissions at the University of Michigan,

constituting the latest development in the nation’s raging debate over the legitimacy of affirmative action policies. The outcomes of the cases could drastically impact the current admissions policies of public universities.

In Related News The U.S. Supreme Court will revisit the legality of affirmative action in public colleges for the first time in two decades. See page 2 The nation’s highest court has not ruled on affirmative action in education since the University of Califomia-Davis case in 1978 when it ruled against quota systems but upheld special consideration for minorities. “You not only have a split among the circuit courts of appeal but you also have a split

in terms of the viewpoint of most Americans on affirmative action,” said Trina Jones, professor of law and former litigator in the area of employ-

ment law. “The Supreme Court is taking up a case that has

monumental significance as

far as where we stand on affirmative action as a nation.” In Grutter v. Bollinger, Barbara Grutter, a white female law school applicant to Michigan who was denied admission, has claimed that her 14th Amendment rights were being violated and has challenged the validity of diversity in an academic context as a compelling state interest. Michigan law school’s admissions policies were initially declared illegal by a U.S. District Court judge,

but the decision was later overturned by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Attorneys general from multiple states pushed for the Supreme Court to establish precedent on the matter in order to foster the uniform development of legally sound admissions policies. Other justifications of afSee MICHIGAN on page 8

Two of the University’s most powerful faculty governance committees could undergo major changes next year under a proposed restructuring that will be presented at Thursday’s Academic Council meeting. In initial discussions, the reorganization was proposed as a merger to help consolidate overlapping agendas ofthe two

committees—the President’s Advisory Committee on Resources and the Academic Priorities Committee. “We realized that the campus has gone through an extensive strategic planning exercise... but the structure of faculty governance had not undergone such a review to see if maybe it could be improved,” said professor and chair of chemistry John Simon, who is chairing APC for the fourth year and also chaired an ad hoc committee created this summer to the study the issue. Committee members ulti-

mately abandoned the idea of the merger—because the workload would be too great—and proposed an alternative system, Simon said. APC would change its name to the Academic Programs Committee, and PACOR would become the University Priorities Committee. The new APC would deal strictly with issues related to

the development of departments and programs on campus and serve as the final stage in

terial that was being thrown at us, some ofthe external reviews were handled a little bit faster

the external reviews of ments and programs, an area that Simon said has not garnered complete attention under the current system. “That set of responsibilities ls about half of what [the current] APC does,” Simon said. “Because of the amount of ma-

th,an they should have been, [The new APC] will really give the committee time to focus on those sets ofissues.” Provost Peter Lange said he expects the new APC to also diacuss broader University-wide is-

See GOVERNANCE on page 7

Blue Devils face Buckeyes in annual Challenge By MIKE COREY The Chronicle

In a state that attracted 50,000 fans to a high school football game in 2001, Ohio State basketball has long struggled to escape the Buckeye State’s religious zeal for football. Particularly in a season in which the school’s gridders are headed to the national championship game, the Ohio State basketball team is starving for attention. But with the football team out of action until January 3rd, head coach Jim O’Brien’s squad may be able to steal some attention in America’s biggest college town, Columbus, Ohio. A win over No. 6 Duke in the ACCBig Ten Challenge would certainly help. The game, being played in Greens-

ROBERT TAI/THE CHRONICLE

CASEY SANDERS lurches for a loose ball during Saturday’s game against UCLA. He may be forced into more such plays tonight against Ohio State’s strong defense.

InQlfiP

An undergraduate junior studying at the Duke Marine Lab remains in critical condition after a weekend accident driving home from Thanksgiving. See page 3

boro, N.C., will be the first meeting between the schools since 1978 when No. 1 Duke was upended in overtime by unranked Ohio State. The Buckeyes are coming off a disappointing 54-48 loss to No. 4 Alabama, a game in which Ohio State exhibited its formidable defense. The

The Durham City Council discussed transportation, crime and a number of additional issues at its meeting Monday night. See page 3

Buckeyes’ trademark scrappy play and intense man-to-man pressure frustrated the Crimson Tide all night long. Alabama’s shots could not have been more pitiful if they had pepper spray in their eyes—they were a horrific 17 percent from the field in the second half. “It was kind of an ugly win, but ugly girls get dates, too,” Crimson Tide coach Mark Gottfried said. “That’s the way we were tonight, but Ohio State had a lot to do with that.” However, that the Buckeyes were still able to lose to Alabama is indicative of the disrepair of Ohio State’s struggling offense. The scarlet-andgray shot a meager 28 percent in the contest, with its best player, senior shooting guard Brent Darby, going 0for-8 on the night. “I stunk the gym up,” he said. “You can see that in my stats.” Ohio State’s shooting woes are partly due to recent injuries to starting point guard Brandon Fuss-Cheatam See OHIO STATE on page 12

Two Duke neurologists may have discovered an alternalive role of a set of proteins, which under certain conditions start attacking neurons. See page 4


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
December 3, 2002 by Duke Chronicle Print Archives - Issuu