December 11, 2017

Page 1

MONDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2017 VOL. CXXXIII NO. 93

THE INDEPENDENT STUDENT NEWSPAPER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA

Controversial TA will not be teaching next semester

FOUNDED 1885

a ban in effect what the Supreme Court decision to enforce trump's travel ban means for penn students

Ph.D. student Stephanie McKellop said she would be taking time to study for exams

MAX COHEN | Contributing Reporter

ALEX RABIN Senior Reporter

This October, Penn history Ph.D. student and history teaching assistant Stephanie McKellop tweeted about her use of a controversial teaching technique known as “progressive stacking.” The tweet generated discussion on and beyond Penn’s campus about race and privilege in the classroom. “I will always call on my Black women students first. Other POC [People of Color] get second tier priority. WW [white women] come next. And, if I have to, white men,” her Oct. 16 tweet read. McKellop recently stated that she will not teach in the spring semester, but the school has remained tightlipped about any findings it has made or steps it has taken since. McKellop explained to The Daily Pennsylvanian in an emailed statement that her time off from teaching next semester stems not from action by the University regarding her use of progressive stacking, but rather from her need to study for exams. “I am not being punished by the university — I am studying for my exams,” she wrote in the email. “History PhD students teach 4 semesters as part of our funding, and I am still teaching 4 semesters. My comprehensive exams are coming up, and that is why I’m focused on those. Comprehensive exams are a normal part of a PhD process.” On Dec. 5, however, McKellop tweeted, “I won’t be teaching next semester due to some admin choices.” McKellop said in a follow up email to the DP that she was referring to University policy governing teaching assistants when she said “admin choices.” “I’m an eager person who loves teaching more than anything, and I would’ve loved to teach every single semester, but we are only allowed to teach for 4,” McKellop wrote. “Admin choices means it is literally impossible for all of the PhD students who desire to TA to TA in the department, so having a surplus of TAs without a matching number of classes that need TAs does not work.” Dean of the School of Arts and Sciences Steven J. Fluharty said in an October statement that the University was investigating the technique, but the school has not provided any updates since. When asked for comment on any decisions or conclusions at which Penn has arrived, University spokesperson Stephen MacCarthy deferred comment to Fluharty’s office.

NO HUMAN

not hate

IS

ILLEGAL

REFUgEES make america

GREAT

America was founded by IMMIGRANTS

n a decision that has widereaching effects on the Penn community, the United States Supreme Court upheld the third and latest iteration of the Trump administration’s travel ban on Dec. 4 — restricting most citizens of Iran, Libya, Chad, Yemen, Somalia, Syria, and North Korea, in addition to some from Venezuela, from entering the United States. The move made the September edition of Trump’s travel ban legal, paving the way for restrictions that, although different for each country,

I

primarily will bar citizens of these countries from immigrating to and, in some cases, working, studying, or vacationing in, the United States. On Penn’s campus, some students fear that this travel ban gives license for people to discriminate against Muslim communities in the United States — other students said they still aren’t sure what Penn administrators are doing to help. University lawyers have previously told affected students not to leave the United States for fear that

SEE MCKELLOP PAGE 5

they may not be able to re-enter, Sudan citizen and College sophomore Aula Ali said. Sudan was not added onto this edition of the travel ban, so although Ali is not directly affected, she has had experience with the University’s support system for these students. “The lawyers [International Student and Scholar Services] provided didn’t really help at all,” Ali said. She gave up an internship this summer in Sudan after a University lawyer told her to stay in the United

States — a move she felt Penn was not prepared to support. After reaching out again to Penn for help, Ali said the University was not sure what to do and did not provide housing accommodation for her over the summer. Executive Director for Education and Academic Planning Rob Nelson has previously said Penn was helping students on a “case-to-case” basis. Ali was not sure if the University was still providing this service. SEE TRAVEL BAN PAGE 2

ANNA LISA LOWENSTEIN & BEN ZHAO | DESIGN ASSOCIATES

Trustees’ chair is key supporter of controversial net neutrality bill

David Cohen is a top executive in Comcast KELLY HEINZERLING Deputy News Editor

The Federal Communications Commission announced plans on Nov. 21 to loosen regulations for internet providers. This would enable the companies to structure service plans that control access to and speed of their internet. On Dec. 14, a Republican bill will be voted on to determine whether the plan will be enacted. If passed, internet providers such as Comcast and Verizon would be allowed to control the content and speed of certain websites, essentially dismantling President Obama’s plan for a free and open internet, otherwise known as “net neutrality.” Among the biggest supporters of this plan is Chair of Penn’s Board of Trustees David Cohen, who is the executive vice president of Comcast

FILE PHOTO

As Executive Vice President of Comcast, David Cohen has voiced opposition to Title II, which supporters say guarantees “net neutrality.”

Corporation. A few hours after the FCC announced plans to roll back net neutrality, Cohen published a blog post on Comcast’s website praising the move toward looser regulations. Cohen has always been a major

advocate of the rollback of net neutrality, saying in 2014 that neutrality advocates have an “almost hysterical reaction” to the loosening of regulations. Cohen declined to comment on this article.

OPINION | Believing in Penn as an ideal

“You should not and do not need to believe that Penn is perfect. You should not love it unconditionally.” - James Lee PAGE 4

SPORTS | A deep dive into Title IX

Women’s teams of individual sports tend to be coached by men, while females coach team-based programs. That’s no coincidence. BACKPAGE

FOLLOW US @DAILYPENN FOR THE LATEST UPDATES ONLINE AT THEDP.COM

NEWS Penn Appétit releases a cookbook PAGE 7

While net neutrality regulations were created in order to ensure that all internet traffic flowed equally and certain content wasn’t unfairly slowed down, opponents say that these rules prevent internet service providers from making investments in their networks to provide better, faster online access. On Penn’s campus, Cohen’s open support of net neutrality has drawn immense criticism, sparking a student protest of the Board of Trustees three years ago. Professor Emeritus of business economics and public policy Gerald Faulhaber and professor of legal studies and business ethics Kevin Werbach both said that Cohen’s anti-net neutrality stance is not a conflict of interest since the matter is not important to Penn as an institution. Universities that have private internet networks, such as Penn, or that are part of National Research and Education Networks would not be affected by the rule change.

Students sending and receiving information on their phones through outside wireless, however, could be impacted. Some institutions would be affected, since they use commercial internet providers. Inside Higher Ed wrote that under the new plan, colleges and universities could charge students differently based on their amount of internet usage. “Students today take for granted that the internet is this amazing, open platform to access information,” Werbach said. “Network neutrality fundamentally is about control over the way information flows on the internet.” The debate over network neutrality and regulations on internet providers began in the early 2000s, Faulhaber said. He added that these debates came to a head in 2010 when the FCC, an independent government agency that regulates interstate communications, failed to pass an order that

internet providers could not discriminate against websites and had to treat all traffic equally. In 2015, under the Obama administration, the FCC tried again and succeeded at passing a law regulating internet providers by classifying the internet as a public utility, not unlike electricity, under Title II of the Telecommunications Act. At the time, Faulhaber was working at the FCC as a chief economist. He said that when the internet became “a highly regulated public utility” in 2015, investment level went down. Another issue contended by net neutrality advocates is the concept of paid prioritization plans — which Faulhaber said would be a way for internet providers to create a “market” for the internet by offering different speeds similar to first class versus regular mail delivery by the postal service. SEE COMCAST PAGE 2

NEWS Gutmann’s Vanguard connection, explained PAGE 9 SEND NEWS TIPS TO NEWSTIP@THEDP.COM CONTACT US: 215-422-4640


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
December 11, 2017 by The Daily Pennsylvanian - Issuu