INDEPENDENT SINCE 1880
The Corne¬ Daily Sun Vol. 132, No. 36
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2015
!
ITHACA, NEW YORK
16 Pages – Free
News
Arts
Sports
Weather
Food for Comfort
Sight for Sore Eyes
Comeback Kids
Cloudy HIGH: 63º LOW: 45º
Julia Dagum ’17 shares some classic fall recipes to stay cozy in the cold weather.
Shay Collins ’18 takes a look at Dilly Dally’s first record Sore.
| Page 8
Men’s soccer ends its fourgame losing streak with a win against Colgate.
| Page 10
| Page 16
Faculty Donations Flood Left, Filings Show Over 96 percent of donations go to Democratic campaigns from 2011-14 By PHOEBE KELLER and EMILY FRIEDMAN Sun Assistant News Editor and Sun Staff Writer
Of the nearly $600,000 Cornell’s faculty donated to political candidates or parties in the past four years, over 96 percent has gone to fund Democratic campaigns, while only 15 of the 323 donors gave to conservative causes. The Sun’s analysis of Federal Election Committee data reveals that from 2011 to 2014, Cornell’s faculty donated $573,659 to Democrats, $16,360 to Republicans and $2,950 to Independents. Each of Cornell’s 13 schools — both graduate and undergraduate — slanted heavily to the left. In the College of Arts and Sciences, 99 percent of the $183,644 donated went to liberal campaigns. The law school demonstrated the strongest conservative showing, with nearly 26 percent of its approximately $20,000 worth of donations going to Republicans. Almost one-third of donations made over the past four years went to 2012 presidential campaigns. More than 94 percent of the $200,000 Cornellians contributed to the presidential race went to the Obama Victory Fund, while the Romney Victory Fund received under four percent of these funds. To compile this data, The Sun filtered public Federal Election Committee filings, collecting the donation information from individuals who listed Cornell University as their employer. The Sun then confirmed the current appointment of each donor as a Cornell faculty member, instructor or researcher. Administrators and other personnel were excluded from all calculations. Surprised?
DATA COMPILED FROM FEDERAL ELECTION COMMITTEE
Blue Ivy | This graph shows the partisan breakdown of political donations coming out of each of Cornell’s undergraduate and graduate schools and colleges.
Although students and professors alike said they consider Cornell’s faculty generally Democratic, nearly all remarked that they had not expected to see donation numbers so dramatically skewed. “Nationally, economists, chemists, business school professors and engineers are significantly more conservative than professors in social sciences and humanities,” said
DATA COMPILED FROM FEDERAL ELECTION COMMITTEE
Spending big | The top six faculty donors from Cornell over the past four years all gave to Democratic candidates and causes, giving a combined total of $141,850.
Prof. Mildred Elizabeth Sanders, government. “Finding 97 percent of Cornell professors giving to Democrats, that’s surprising.” Danielle Eiger ’18 said she would have thought that the Democrat-Republican breakdown would be closer to 60 percent and 40 percent, but said she was always sure that the “majority of professors are liberal.” Prof. William Jacobson, law, one of the 15 Republican donors, said that he found the statistics “completely predictable.” “Academia in general leans heavily liberal, and that likely is compounded at Cornell because Ithaca itself is a progressive bubble, surrounded by reality, as the saying goes,” he said. Inside the Bubble
Though Cornell’s administration declined to comment See DONATIONS page 4
Garrett Continues Day Hall Shake-Up Faculty Senate Talks Hierarchy changes again; arts college creates position
By REBECCA BLAIR
The new position is intend- and Insurance, Emergency Sun Assistant News Editor ed to oversee all of Cornell’s M a n a g e m e n t / B u s i n e s s Continuity, risk-related units in After several months ripe with efforts to maximize Environmental Health personnel fluctuations, the operational efficienand Safety and the University has announced that it cies, Garrett said in a Cornell University will restructure the presidential University statement. Police Department. leadership team and add a direcIn her new posi“We are extremely tor of education innovation posi- tion, DeStefano will fortunate to have tion to the College of Arts and “continue oversight of Joanne’s substantial talSciences. Financial Affairs, the ents — including her LEPAGE President Elizabeth Garrett Investment Office and financial acumen and plans to add an executhe Audit Office, and deep understanding of the tive vice president and will share oversight University — to draw upon as we chief financial officer to with Provost Michael look to the opportunities and her team, pending Kotlikoff of In- challenges ahead,” Garrett said in board of trustee formation Tech- a statement. approval of the posinologies and Budget Almost immediately after this tion, according to a and Planning,” in academic year began, Garrett University press release. keeping with her pre- announced that she would begin Garrett has appointed vious duties, according her tenure by restructuring the DeSTEFANO Joanne DeStefano, the to the release. She will Cornell administration to be current vice president also take on oversight more efficient. She has already for finance and chief financial of Infrastructure, Properties and officer, to fill the new position. Planning, Risk Management See ADMINISTRATION page 5
On Finance,Romance
By MELVIN LI Sun Staff Writer
The Faculty Senate addressed the rising costs of the University’s financial aid program, plans to resolve the University’s deficit and proposed revisions to Cornell’s policy on romantic and sexual relations between students and faculty at its meeting Wednesday. Dean of Faculty Prof. Joseph Burns Ph.D. ’66, astronomy, began the meeting by announcing an upcoming faculty forum will discuss the feasibility and educational sense of Cornell’s current financial aid policy. According to Burns, the forum, entitled “Financial Aid Policies: Unimaginable Outcomes,” is intended to be a little bit
provocative. “There are large expenses in the University. We knew building costs are expensive. Our salary costs are expensive .... and financial aid is a growing cost to the University,” Burns said. “If you look at the amount of funds that we’re spending [on financial aid], the curve has a very steep slope — an increasing slope over the last few years. So I think that the faculty should look at that growing cost and whether or not it makes sense.” Burns said he see two possible outcomes if the University continues to spend as much as it currently does on financial aid. He said that it is very important to balance the needs of faculty and See FACULTY SENATE page 5