Common Ground Magazine November December2021

Page 1

Letter to RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki RCMP National Headquarters 73 Leikin Dr Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2 October 21, 2021


ear Commissioner Brenda Lucki: We respectfully submit this open letter to express our most sincere concerns and resolute stand against the forced coercive medical intervention of Canadians, and against the undue discrimination experienced by those exercising their lawful right to bodily autonomy. We are not against vaccinations, but as law enforcement officers, we cannot in good conscience willingly participate in enforcing mandates that we believe go against the best interests of the people we protect.


As Canadians, our constitutionally-protected freedoms precede the government, and may only be temporarily limited if the majority of evidence justifies such infringements as reasonable, provable, and guided by law. If presented with all available evidence in a court, we firmly believe the government implemented mandates would not hold up under scrutiny. As experienced investigators, we look past what information is provided and focus on how the information is presented. A proper investigation should be conducted as objectively as possible, and follow the principle that it is better to have questions that cannot be answered than to have answers that cannot be questioned. A complete investigation must include full disclosure of all the facts of the case, even contradictory evidence. Why, then, is there little to no tolerance for free and open debate on this matter? Many credible medical and scientific experts are being censored. Accordingly, we rightly have concerns about “the science” we are being coerced to “follow”.As representatives of our communities within the RCMP and representatives of the RCMP in our communities, we have never witnessed such division in our country. This sense of “Us versus Them” will be further fueled by having a police force consisting only of “vaccinated” people, while serving communities consisting of “unvaccinated” people, which goes against the community policing model the RCMP has strived to achieve. As law enforcement officers, we already face higher levels of stress and mental illnesses due to the nature of our work. These have been compounded – considerably – by mandates that we believe are deeply unethical, threatening our livelihood, and dividing society. As federal employees, what is being done to mitigate this stress? Moreover, what assurances are we given that the injections will not cause short or long-term side effects? What steps will be taken to ensure members are compensated for adverse side effects? Police officers are expected to preserve the peace, uphold the law, and defend the public interest. We strongly believe that forced and coerced medical treatments undermine all three and, thus, contradict our duties and responsibilities to Canadians. We remain

loyal to the Charter and Bill of Rights and ask you to send investigators to collect statements from medical professionals (and other reliable witnesses) who allege they have been silenced – putting lives at risk. Allow us to make this information publicly available to all so the public can scrutinize it and achieve informed consent.


This letter was created from the collective thoughts, beliefs, and opinions of actively serving police officers of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) from across the country. We have a wealth of experience which includes, but is not limited to, General Duty, Federal Serious and Organized Crime, School Liaison, Prime Minister Protection Detail, Emergency Response Team, Media Relations, and Combined Forces Special Enforcement Unit. We come from various ranks, levels of experience, communities, cultural backgrounds, religious beliefs, and vaccination statuses. Together we are the Mounties for Freedom. We are individual police officers who united in the belief that citizens, including federal employees, should not be forced and coerced into taking a medical intervention.


In August 2021, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced, “Federal public servants need to be fully vaccinated,” and that for those without a medical exemption who choose not to be vaccinated: “There will be consequences”. Since that statement, many federal employees have been told they will be sent home without pay for refusing to receive a contested medical treatment. We have united in the belief that people should not be forced or coerced into receiving the current COVID19 treatments – it should be voluntary. We stand united against the forced and coerced medical intervention of Canadians and against the discrimination faced by those who have exercised their right to bodily autonomy. We believe in democracy, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the Bill of Rights. This is not about whether people should be vaccinated – that is a personal choice.


Our primary duty as peace officers in the RCMP is the preservation of peace. We have never witnessed the level of division in our country as we currently see from the COVID-19 pandemic. It is our responsibility, now more than ever, to make all efforts at preserving the peace in our country. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the Charter) protects fundamental rights and freedoms essential to keeping Canada a free and democratic society. The Canadian Bill of Rights adds, “… the Canadian Nation is founded upon principles that acknowledge … the dignity and worth of the human person and the position of the family in a society of free men and free institutions.” It continues to say, “Affirming also that men and institutions remain free only when freedom is founded upon respect for moral and spiritual values and

the rule of law.”We believe our federal and provincial governments have failed to uphold the Charter, Bill of Rights, and Constitution and we are witnessing the erosion of democracy in Canada. As you know, the Charter does not guarantee absolute freedoms. If the government is going to limit freedoms, it must establish the limitations are reasonable given all available facts. The government must adhere to a process to prove their actions are appropriate, called the Oakes test. We firmly believe, if presented with all available evidence in a court, the government implemented mandates would not pass the Oakes test. At the time of writing this letter, the Charter’s section 33 Notwithstanding Clause has not been invoked for this pandemic. Requiring mandatory COVID-19 treatment options is a slippery slope and allows the government to overstep its authority unchecked. It infringes on the fundamental belief in our society that the individual has the right and freedom to choose. The choice of whether to receive medical treatments has always been an individual’s right in Canada. The Canadian National Report on Immunization (1996) stated “Immunization is not mandatory in Canada; it cannot be made mandatory because of the Canadian Constitution.” Section 2 of The Charter guarantees these fundamental freedoms through the freedom of conscience (subsection a) and the freedom of thought, belief, opinion, and expression (subsection b). Without individuals having the freedom to choose, we would not have a democratic society. Though the Nuremberg Code is not a law, it is internationally accepted and falls in line with the spirit of our Charter and Bill of Rights. A key component of the Nuremberg Code is that participants in a medical experiment need to participate voluntarily without any form of force or coercion. We have obtained documentation from several Canadian doctors who have explained the current COVID-19 treatment options in Canada, being referred to as “vaccines”, were recently authorized as new drugs despite the absence of long-term data. According to these accredited Canadian doctors, these treatment options did not meet the criteria of true vaccines until very recently when the definition of vaccine was changed. Without long-term data, these vaccines are still experimental. We believe the act of removing the rights and freedoms of citizens who refuse to participate in specific COVID19 treatment options is a form of coercion. The Criminal Code contains our country’s Criminal Offences and explains that a person commits an assault by intentionally applying force to someone else without that person’s consent. The Criminal Code further explains that consent is not obtained from a person who submits, or neglects to resist, on the grounds of authority being exercised over them. How then can someone give proper consent to a COVID-19 treatment injection when doing so under the threat of losing their job, freedoms, or livelihood? Canadian courts have already ruled that medical treatment without proper informed consent is an assault. As law enforcement officers, we cannot in good conscience willingly participate in enforcing mandates that violate continued p.6…

Copies of Common Ground magazine NOW available for distribution right across Canada! Call 604-569-9992 or email:

in this issue



Letter to RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki



Brian Peckford on Canada’s Charter Brian Peckford

Attention: David Eby, Attorney General of BC Kari Simpson


Resource Directory


The Nuremberg Code



Nuremberg Doctors Trial 75 Anniversary

Parents – Protect Your Children Ted Kuntz


Risk of Cancer from mRNA injections Daniel Nagase, MD


The Real Anthony Fauci Robert Kennedy Jr. new book


Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms


Windbags on the Wing Geoff Olson


Accounting - Maggie Si Layout & Production - David Bolton

Brian Peckford on Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms


n this day 40 years ago I presented a written proposal to all First Ministers that several hours later became the Patriation Agreement which included the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It began the night before (Nov. 4) as a written proposal from the Newfoundland delegation to three Provinces in the Saskatchewan suite (Alberta and British Columbia plus of course Saskatchewan) of the Chateau Laurier Hotel. At the November 5 breakfast meeting all first Ministers of the group of eight were present except Manitoba, but the Attorney General was present with instructions from his Premier. Quebec was present and had an opportunity to review the document. The proposal was accepted by seven Provinces with Quebec objecting. I was asked to present the proposal to full conference of all the First Ministers later that day . The proposal became the Patriation Agreement later that day and the next year became known as the Constitution Act of 1982. It was thought at the time that by putting the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the Constitution, insulating it from the political machinations of Federal Legislation to which the 1960 Bill of Rights was subjected , that our Country would be secure in that its citizens were guaranteed of their rights and freedoms.

Today , we find that not even Constitutional Protection safeguards our rights and freedoms as Governments from St. John’s to Victoria plus the Territories run rough shod over our most sacred of documents. Governments think some how that Section 1 protects them . But Section 1 says: “1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.” Not one Government has even attempted to “demonstrably justify” their actions in this covid situation of lock downs, masks, mandates and vaccines, causing death and injury, suicide, depression, job loses and the loss of the most precious of ideas — hope. It is somehow as if the Government speaks or acts it is automatically justified. Hon. A. Brian Peckford P.C. Only living First Minister who helped craft The Constitution Act of 1982. Brian Peckford will speak at the December 9 Nuremberg Doctors Trial 75th anniversary event at the BC Legislature , Thursday at 3:00 pm. Gathering starts at 2:00 pm. More information on pages 4, 5 and 6 in this edition of Common Ground.

Sales Professional Wanted

East is East 3035 West Broadway in Kitsilano

Live Music

cover design: Kris Kozak


With special thanks to Heritage Canada, Canada Periodical Fund, Special Measures for Journalism

Contributors: Fran Manary, Kim Hunter, Elizabeth Woodworth, James Loewen, Geoff Olson, Ted Kuntz, Kari Simpson, Mary Etey, Byron Sheardown, Joan Morgan,Thomas Oakley, Brian Peckford, Daniel Nagase, Robert Kennedy Jr., Tony Lyons, Kathleen Schmidt, Alex Posoukh Editorial, Distribution Inquiries, Management & Advertising Tel. 604-569-9992 Publications Mail Agreement No. 40011171 Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to Circulation Dept., Head office ISSN No. 0824-0698 Head Office Common Ground Publishing Corp. 3152 West 8th Ave. Vancouver, BC V6K 2C3 Reach Common Ground’s great audience now right across Canada Over 300,000 readers per issue.. Survey shows 3 - 4 readers/copy, plus online at and our Facebook link. 100% owned and operated by Canadians. Published 6 times a year in Canada. Annual subscription is $75 (US$75) for one year. Single issues are $10 (specify issue #). Payable by cheque, Visa, MasterCard, Interac or money order. Printed on recycled paper with vegetable inks. All contents copyrighted. Written permission from the publisher is required to reproduce, quote, reprint, or copy any material from Common Ground. Opinions and views expressed in the articles do not necessarily reflect those of the publishers or advertisers. Common Ground Publishing Corp. neither endorses nor assumes any liability for any and all products or services advertised or within editorial content. Furthermore, healthrelated content is not intended as medical advice and in no way excludes the necessity of an opinion from a health professional. Advertisers are solely responsible for their claims.

Special thanks to all those unmentioned who made this first ever across Canada edition possible. You know who you are. Thank you from the Common Ground Team, the existing readers, and all the new reads who will discover Common Ground for the first time ever!

mbbeerr//DDeecceem mbbeerr 2 20 02 21 1 NNoovveem


es, we are passionate about natural health, environment, peace, personal growth, independent media, art, politics, music and culture! Motivated, skillful and honest? We are looking for the right person to earn good money by selling advertising in a magazine dedicated to awareness and real change. Email your resume and cover letter to joseph@commonground. ca

Publisher & Senior Editor - Joseph Roberts


The Nuremberg Code

Directives For Human Experimentation


he Nuremberg Military Tribunal’s decision in the case of the United States v Karl Brandt et al. includes what is now called the Nuremberg Code, a ten point statement delimiting permissible medical experimentation on human subjects. According to this statement, humane experimentation is justified only if its results benefit society and it is carried out in accord with basic principles that “satisfy moral, ethical, and legal concepts.” To some extent the Nuremberg Code has been superseded by the Declaration of Helsinki as a guide for human experimentation. “Permissible Medical Experiments.” Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Nuremberg October 1946 - April 1949, Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office (n.d.), vol. 2., pp. 181-182. 1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion, and should

have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity. 2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature. 3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a

knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment. 4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury. 5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects. 6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment. 7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury disability or death. 8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment. 9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

N o v e m b e r / D e c e m b e r 2021

10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required by him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.


Nuremberg 2.0

A United States of America v. Karl Brandt, et al. (also known as the Doctors’ trial), Nuremberg, Germany. Defendants seated under guard in the dock behind the defense counsel during the Doctors Trial, which was held in Nuremberg, Germany, from December 9, 1946, to August 20, 1947.

team of over 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich have begun legal proceedings against the CDC, WHO & the Davos Group for crimes against humanity. In addition to the flawed tests and fraudulent death certificates, the “experimental” vaccine itself is in violation of Article 32 of the Geneva Convention. Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention IV, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not necessitated by the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited.

Nuremberg Doctors Trial

75th Anniversary: Dedicated to the future of our children Thursday, December 9th BC Legislature, Victoria Gather at 2:00 to meet & greet friends 3:00 PM Speakers, candlelight ceremony at sunset


n December 9, 1946 the Nazi doctor’s trial began in Nuremberg, Germany. These doctors were charged for medical crimes, which included experimenting on people without their informed consent.

“Doctors, in short, played a crucial role in the Final Solution. The full significance of medically directed killing for Nazi theory and behaviour cannot be comprehended unless we understand how Nazi doctors destroyed the boundary between healing and killing.” Robert Jay Lifton, German Doctors and The Final Solution Sept.21, 1986 The New York Times December 9, 2021 is the 75th anniversary of the Doctors Trial’s first day. MD’s were convicted and

Nuremberg Doctors Trial 75th Anniversary 1946 - 2021

December 9th

BC Legislature, Victoria

3:00 pm Thursday Speakers sharing the light of wisdom followed by Volunteer email Common Ground

bring lanterns & candles

continued p.6…


sunset candlelight ceremony

November/ December


sentenced to death for their atrocities. What began as pretense of medical care became the concentration camps. One of the first groups signing on to support the Nazi’s Final Solution were doctors. We will remember those doctors’ crimes, and honour the Doctors Trial that birthed the ten medical principles of the Nuremberg Code which became international law. These hard earned medical ethics and principles are significant during our current covid epoch where civil rights are being eroded by politicians and their unelected bureaucrats. We must never forget how those medical crimes against humanity crept into a modern culture, and, how corruption of civic values erodes a country where distracted citizens are fed fear by power-hungry leaders. We, the people of BC, will take our stand in front of the legislature in Victoria on Thursday, December 9 to honour the Nuremberg medical code and to protect our rights guaranteed under the highest laws of Canada, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms enshrined in our Canadian Constitution. This supreme Canadian legal document was created to protect people’s rights from corruption from all quarters, including governments or their agents. Top politicians in BC used covid to grab dictatorial powers through the BC Emergency Program Act. This emergency act was created for floods and forest fires. A two-week sunset clause was wisely written into the act to stop misuse of assumptive power. That is why politicians, or their front-line actors such as Bonnie Henry, kept renewing it every two weeks. Two weeks ballooned into two months, and is heading toward two years with no end in sight, except for politicians’ shoddy promises. Their charade must end now. Power has corrupted these few politicians. They have disregarded the The Nuremberg Code: Directives for Human Experimentation established during the Doctors Trial. They mandate measures and push experimental gene therapy injections titled “vaccines” in order to avoid liability. They can call them “vaccines” a million times, but they are still not vaccines. They do not make the recipient immune from the disease they purport to protect people from. The shots are still experimental. The politicians pushing these experimental mRNA injections don’t have a clue about the harm they are causing. How could they know when the long term trials are not completed. Pregnant women are


… Open Letter to RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki, from pg. 2

the laws of our country and breach the rights and freedoms of the people we protect.


Each year, on the 11th of November, we remember those who sacrificed their lives for our freedoms. From Flanders Field to Juno Beach, many Canadians have bled and died fighting tyrannical nations. We need to remember past events to prevent the repetition of history’s greatest mistakes. On the 30th of September, we had the opportunity to reflect on such times during our first National Day for Truth and Reconciliation. Under the direction of the Government of Canada, RCMP members were once issued lawful orders to remove children from their homes and transport them to residential schools. Canada is still recovering from the impact of those decisions and actions. The RCMP has yet to regain the trust of some citizens. There was a time when scientists believed humans were divided into racial hierarchies and that a person’s intelligence level and characteristics were determined by race. These beliefs were not heavily contested and were widely accepted as scientific fact. Phrenology was also widely accepted as being a legitimate scientific study. These are not

examples of science being wrong but of people conducting poor investigations or misunderstanding their findings. These are just two of several historical examples of widely accepted scientific truths, which became ridiculed practices. We look back at those times of racial hierarchy and wonder how something so wrong could have been so widely accepted as truth. It is just as hard for many people to conceptualize how RCMP officers could have blindly followed lawful orders that devastated so many lives. Yet now we find ourselves in dangerous waters, when RCMP officers are being forced under coercion and duress to participate in actions they believe go against the spirit of Canadian laws. We find it ironic that an organization that preaches the honour and respect of Canadian values, and the sacrifice of their veterans, would support actions that contradict the values our veterans fought to uphold. Enforcement of identification and checkpoints was an early step in what would become the Holocaust. Canadian citizens of various backgrounds are being segregated and punished for choosing not to disclose a personal medical decision. We cannot think of a more ironic and cruel way for our governments to pay homage to the sacrifices Canadians have made worldwide to protect individual freedoms than by participating in a process that takes those freedoms away. Today, instead of

having one version of scientific “truth” during this pandemic, we have versions that contradict one another. How can some professionals be so certain their interpretation of science is correct when others give evidence to the contrary? History has already demonstrated we get things wrong even when our scientists agree. We acknowledge there is a spectrum filled with beliefs relating to this pandemic. For the sake of simplicity, we will refer to two main schools of thought: the common narrative (those who believe the current COVID-19 treatment injections are the way through the pandemic) and those who have concerns with the COVID-19 treatment injections. It’s important to note we are not discussing “antivaxxers” in this letter. We are discussing people with various vaccination statuses who pose questions about the current COVID-19 treatment options being forced upon them. …


Commissioner Lucki, we ask that you represent the best image of the RCMP by remaining loyal to the Charter and Bill of Rights and not to any particular public figure. Our job as Mounties is to preserve the peace. If we continue down this road of segregation and discrimination, we risk repeating past mistakes. The divide in our society is quickly leaning

toward a level of national security. We ask that you open an investigation to ensure no criminal acts were committed in the dissemination of information from federal and provincial health authorities or public figures in positions of trust. We ask you to send investigators to collect statements from medical professionals (and other reliable witnesses) who allege they had been silenced – putting lives at risk. Allow us to make this information publicly available to all so the public can scrutinize it and achieve informed consent. As Canada’s national police force, we are unique in our ability to conduct a large-scale cross-country investigation, which must be transparent to regain trust in the government. We also ask that you challenge the Federal Government’s decision to send Mounties home without pay for decisions they’ve made on beliefs protected by Canadian laws. Neither the RCMP, nor the communities they serve, can endure the loss of experienced police officers. We await your response and your plan of action. Respectfully, Mounties for Freedom This is an abbreviated version of the original. A complete copy of the text is available at:

75th Anniversary of Nuremberg Doctors Trial N o v e m b e r / D e c e m b e r 2021

…Nuremberg Doctors Trial event from pg. 5


given the jab, but the mRNA injections were never tested on pregnant women. Now they are going after our children! These injections were never tested on children. We say stop! Enough! Justin Trudeau, John Horgan and Adrian Dix, have you no shame! These eager politicians, bureaucrats and their servants are ignoring the Canadian law. We, the people, unite in solidarity to honour the marriage between the 10 Nuremberg Medical Principles and our beloved Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. These two form a mighty union to protect our democracy, our children, and our grandchildren. Just as our parents and grandparents fought the Nazis in the 1940’s to protect our democratic freedoms, we are fighting these medicalized fascists and their corrupted

government actors now. Mark December 9 on your calendar now. Prepare for your journey to end the anti-democratic lock-down that is decimating small business and destroying culture. We will demand an end to the discriminatory vaccine passport. Un-vaccinated people have the right to work, the right to travel, and the right to fully participate in society without been discriminated against. These right are enshrined in our Canadian Charter of Rights and freedom. (see pages 8 and 9 in this edition of Common Ground) Politicians have deceived, bluffed and coerced us for far too long. They have divided us: pitting the masked against the unmasked, the vaccinated against the unvaccinated. It ends now. We, the people of BC, demand an end to the charade of pharma-profiteering parading as public health measures.

Covid measures have killed more people, ruined more businesses and people’s lives, than the purported pandemic. On Thursday, December 9 we will gather respectfully and peacefully in front of our legislature in Victoria, BC to demand this current government obey our Canadian Constitution, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and, to honour the 10 Nuremberg Medical Principles. The First Nuremberg principle demands “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential” ... “to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion”. This applies to all covid mandates such as masking, social distancing, denial of assembly or association, and vaccine coercion.

Notes: Bring a tall pole which can stand on the ground to make easier to hold with a sign over head height, clearly naming your union, religion, organization, profession, business, town, tribe or community. Volunteers can contact Bring lanterns, candles and a lighter. This is a respectful, honouring outdoor event regardless of the weather, so dress warmly. Bring a lantern or device to protect your candles from the wind. Bring a picture of someone who was harmed or died from the vaccine, or spent the last days of their life locked down and not allowed to see their loved ones. These photos will be assembled and left on the BC Legislature steps to bear witness. You are welcome to video or photograph. The day following December 9th fittingly is International Human Right day. We are many, and together we are strong.

Risk of Cancer from mRNA injections in Children A perspective on the developing child’s body and our duty to protect our young. By Daniel Nagase, MD Note: Dr Nagase will speak 3:00 pm Thursday, December 9 in Victoria, BC Legislature for the Nuremberg Doctors Trial 75th Anniversary event (see poster this edition; contact


ɶɶ These three theoretical risks add up to an extreme risk of cancer, especially for children. com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS2451945619301412%3Fshowall%3Dt rue


to a greater risk of cancer over its lifetime. These three theoretical risks add up to an extreme risk of cancer, especially for children. The precautionary principle of doing no harm has been abandoned by medical regulatory authorities and governments alike. One must ask the question, what kind of person would out of their own fear of illness, inject a child with a substance proven to cause debilitating myocarditis in the short term, and potentially deadly cancers in the long term – side effects that only appear decades later, right when children are about to live the best parts of their lives and start families of their own. It is unconscionable to allow such attitudes of fear to sabotage the trust of our future generations. How would our children and grandchildren look upon us if we failed in our most basic duty to protect? In addition to all the theoretical risks of cancer mentioned above, a new study was published on October 13 detailing a much more rapid mechanism of cancer. https:// This is a mechanism of cancer that I did not expect, which illustrates how rudimentary our understanding of these mRNA injections is. In the article they looked at how important non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) DNA repair plays a critical role

in lymphocyte–specific recombination–activating gene endonuclease (RAG) –mediated V(D)J recombination. In simpler terms, DNA repair mechanisms are essential to proper function of B cells and T cells within the immune system. These researchers studied whether SARS–CoV–2 proteins hijack the DNA damage repair system, thereby affecting adaptive immunity, by examining the activity of NHEJ repair and homologous recombination (HR) repair in cells exposed to various SARS–CoV–2 proteins. Pay close attention to Figure 1. NHEJ repair and homologous recombination (HR) repair are two major DNA repair pathways that not only continuously monitor and ensure genome integrity but are also vital for adaptive immune cell functions. Notice how short the bars are for spike protein on NHEJ repair and HR repair efficiency. Another harmful SARS–CoV–2 protein to DNA repair is NSP-1, but it is not nearly as bad as spike protein. So it appears that SARS–CoV–2 is quite harmful to DNA repair. However, does that mean that we have to be worried about SARS–CoV–2 infections in the human body when taken whole as a system? My answer is no, so long as SARS–CoV–2 remains a surface infection on mucosal and epithelial cells. That is, cells on the outside of the body, including those in the nose, mouth and those which line the insides of the lungs that are exposed to air and the outside world. These cells are shed and replaced by the body about every 30-90 days. So if an epithelial cell suffers DNA damage, whether or not that leads to cancer is of little significance because that cell is shed before the DNA damage can turn the cell into a malignant cancer. However, if SARS–CoV–2 enters the bloodstream, or even worse if an mRNA injection producing spike protein enters the bloodstream, then that spike protein now has access to much longer lived cells in the body. Some of those cells are what I like to call the forever cells that live with a person for their entire life - cells like stem cells, neurons, B cells and T cells. If these cells suffer DNA damage, then the chances of cancer are much higher because these cells live for decades within the body. When DNA damage goes unrepaired in the cells it persists for years within the body. The likelihood that a malignant cancer develops increases with every year. This direct toxicity to DNA repair makes spike protein injections extremely dangerous and carcinogenic. In fact the younger the patient the worse the effect of spike proteins because young bodies need their cells for several decades, giving all the more time for DNA damage to accumulate and lead to cancer. Children especially are at the highest risk from mRNA injections, particularly mRNA injections that produce spike proteins. Web sources:

November/ December

his theoretical overview of the cancer risks of mRNA injections in children is an opener to a question that will not be settled for decades. Though applied theory can always suffer the criticism that it is not yet borne out in reality, with respect to the mRNA therapies from Moderna and Pfizer for Covid-19, prior theoretical warnings on the lack of efficacy to prevent transmission and development of resistance quickly turned theoretical warnings into reality within months. For a refresher, basic immunology theory warned that spike protein production in the blood would not produce the Immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies in the airways capable of preventing Covid-19 transmission. Furthermore, the molecular biologic warning that mRNA injections for only the spike protein would quickly cause the virus to develop resistance through evolution also came true with the rapid appearance of injection defeating variants. Thus theory, when solid underpinnings are exactingly applied, bears true in reality. The following three mechanisms present application of theory to the cancer risks of mRNA injections in children. The importance of these applied theories lie in their ability to offer a glimpse into the future of the children who have already received mRNA injections. 1) Retrotransposons and reverse transcriptase: Retrotransposons are DNA segments thought to occupy almost a third of the human genome. Amongst the proteins coded by retrotransposons, one of the most important ones is called reverse transcriptase. Reverse transcriptase is an enzyme capable of reverse transcribing mRNA back into DNA. The role of reverse transcriptase within the cell is not fully understood, but embryologic and developmental studies showed that the reverse transcriptase proteins appeared to affect development, and were most active during growth and development. The problem when mRNA coding for a non-human protein such as spike protein encounters reverse transcriptase, which is more prevalent in children, is that the mRNA is reverse transcribed into DNA. Once there is a DNA copy of that mRNA, it is possible for the DNA copy to enter the nucleus and integrate into the cell’s DNA – thus changing the cell’s DNA forever. 2) Molecular impairment of cancer surveillance: The immune system plays a vital role in detecting and eliminating cancerous cells. Essential to the immune system’s detection of cancerous cells is the recognition of abnormal proteins that are often produced by mutated cells. When an mRNA injection for a non-human protein such as the Covid-19 spike protein is given to children, that child’s immune system which is still in development,

may become tolerant of abnormal proteins in the blood. Thus when, later in life, that immune system is supposed to detect mutant proteins from cancer cells, it may no longer do so after having “learned” during childhood that abnormal proteins are acceptable when produced by local cells. This impairs a child’s future immune system from detecting cancer. 3) Impairment of DNA protection and repair proteins. When a cell is infected with artificial mRNA, it may not produce as many DNA protection and repair proteins as it usually would had it not been taken over by nonhuman mRNA. For example, one class of proteins that prevents damage to DNA during times of stress are called Heat Shock Proteins. These proteins protect a cell’s DNA from toxic damage, thermal damage and even radiation damage. Let’s say for the sake of argument, a cell has 10,000 free ribososmes ready to transcribe proteins. Normally if that cell were to get exposed to thermal and radiation stress, for example from a sunburn, then all 10,000 of those ribosomes can be quickly employed to protect and repair DNA from damage. However, if 5000 of those 10,000 ribososmes are producing spike proteins, then that cell’s DNA protection and repair proteins will be reduced by 1/2. Thus any cell producing mRNA spike proteins instead of protective heat shock proteins, is exposing itself



hereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms 1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

Fundamental Freedoms 2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association.


Democratic Rights 3. Every citizen of Canada has the right to vote in an election of members of the House of Commons or of a legislative assembly and to be qualified for membership therein. 4.(1) No House of Commons and no legislative assembly shall continue for longer than five years from the date fixed for the return of the writs at a general election of its members. (2) In time of real or apprehended war, invasion or insurrection, a House of Commons may be continued by Parliament and a legislative assembly may be continued by the legislature beyond five years if such continuation is not opposed by the votes of more than one-third of the members of the House of Commons or the legislative assembly, as the case may be. 5. There shall be a sitting of Parliament and of each legislature at least once every twelve months.

Mobility Rights 6.(1) Every citizen of Canada has the right to enter, remain in and leave Canada. (2) Every citizen of Canada and every person who has the status of a permanent resident of Canada has the right (a) to move to and take up residence in any province; and (b) to pursue the gaining of a livelihood in any province. (3) The rights specified in subsection (2) are subject to (a) any laws or practices of general application in force in a province other than those that discriminate among persons primarily on the basis of province of present or previous residence; and (b) any laws providing for reasonable residency requirements as a qualification for the receipt of publicly provided social services. (4) Subsections (2) and (3) do not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration in a province of conditions of individuals in that province who are socially or economically disadvantaged if the rate of employment in that province is below the rate of employment in Canada.

Legal Rights N o v e m b e r / D e c e m b e r 2021

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. 8. Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure. 9. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned. 10. Everyone has the right on arrest or detention (a) to be informed promptly of the reasons therefor; (b) to retain and instruct counsel without delay and to be informed of that right; and (c) to have the validity of the detention determined by way of habeas corpus and to be released if the detention is not lawful. 11. Any person charged with an offence has the right (a) to be informed without unreasonable delay of the specific offence; (b) to be tried within a reasonable time; (c) not to be compelled to be a witness in proceedings against that person in respect of the offence; (d) to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal; (e) not to be denied reasonable bail without just cause; (f ) except in the case of an offence under military law tried before a military tribunal, to the benefit of trial by jury where the maximum punishment for the offence is imprisonment for five years or a more severe punishment; (g) not to be found guilty on account of any act or omission unless, at the time of the act or omission, it constituted an offence under Canadian or international law or was criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations; (h) if finally acquitted of the offence, not to be tried for it again and, if finally found guilty and punished for the offence, not to be tried or punished for it again; and (i) if found


guilty of the offence and if the punishment for the offence has been varied between the time of commission and the time of sentencing, to the benefit of the lesser punishment. 12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment. 13. A witness who testifies in any proceedings has the right not to have any incriminating evidence so given used to incriminate that witness in any other proceedings, except in a prosecution for perjury or for the giving of contradictory evidence. 14. A party or witness in any proceedings who does not understand or speak the language in which the proceedings are conducted or who is deaf has the right to the assistance of an interpreter.

Equality Rights 15.(1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. (2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Official Languages of Canada 16.(1) English and French are the official languages of Canada and have equality of status and equal rights and privileges as to their use in all institutions of the Parliament and government of Canada. (2) English and French are the official languages of New Brunswick and have equality of status and equal rights and privileges as to their use in all institutions of the legislature and government of New Brunswick. (3) Nothing in this Charter limits the authority of Parliament or a legislature to advance the equality of status or use of English and French. 16.1(1) The English linguistic community and the French linguistic community in New Brunswick have equality of status and equal rights and privileges, including the right to distinct educational institutions and such distinct cultural institutions as are necessary for the preservation and promotion of those communities. (2) The role of the legislature and government of New Brunswick to preserve and promote the status, rights and privileges referred to in subsection (1) is affirmed. 17.(1) Everyone has the right to use English or French in any debates and other proceedings of Parliament. (2) Everyone has the right to use English or French in any debates and other proceedings of the legislature of New Brunswick.18.(1) The statutes, records and journals of Parliament shall be printed and published in English and French and both language versions are equally authoritative. (2) The statutes, records and journals of the legislature of New Brunswick shall be printed and published in English and French and both



language versions are equally authoritative. 19. (1) Either English or French may be used by any person in, or in any pleading in or process issuing from, any court established by Parliament. (2) Either English or French may be used by any person in, or in any pleading in or process issuing from, any court of New Brunswick. 20.(1) Any member of the public in Canada has the right to communicate with, and to receive available services from, any head or central office of an institution of the Parliament or government of Canada in English or French, and has the same right with respect to any other office of any such institution where (a) there is a significant demand for communications with and services from that office in such language; or (b) due to the nature of the office, it is reasonable that communications with and services from that office be available in both English and French. (2) Any member of the public in New Brunswick has the right to communicate with, and to receive available services from, any office of an institution of the legislature or government of New Brunswick in English or French. 21. Nothing in sections 16 to 20 abrogates or derogates from any right, privilege or obligation with respect to the English and French languages, or either of them, that exists or is continued by virtue of any other provision of the Constitution of Canada. 22. Nothing in sections 16 to 20 abrogates or derogates from any legal or customary right or privilege acquired or enjoyed either before or after the coming into force of this Charter with respect to any language that is not English or French.

Minority Language Educational Rights

General 25. The guarantee in this Charter of certain rights and freedoms shall not be construed so as to abrogate or derogate from any aboriginal, treaty or other rights or freedoms that pertain to the aboriginal peoples of Canada including (a) any rights or freedoms that have been recognized by the Royal Proclamation of October 7, 1763; and (b) any rights or freedoms that now exist by way of land claims agreements or may be so acquired. 26. The guarantee in this Charter of certain rights and freedoms shall not be construed as denying the existence of any other rights or freedoms that exist in Canada. 27. This Charter shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with the preservation and enhancement of the multicultural heritage of Canadians. 28. Notwithstanding anything in this Charter, the rights and freedoms referred to in it are guaranteed equally to male and female persons. 29. Nothing in this Charter abrogates or derogates from any rights or privileges guaranteed by or under the Constitution of Canada in respect of denominational, separate or dissentient schools. 30. A reference in this Charter to a province or to the legislative assembly or legislature of a province shall be deemed to include a reference to the Yukon Territory and the Northwest Territories, or to the appropriate legislative authority thereof, as the case may be. 31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.

Application of Charter 32.(1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province. (2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), section 15 shall not have effect until three years after this section comes into force. 33.(1) Parliament or the legislature of a province may expressly declare in an Act of Parliament or of the legislature, as the case may be, that the Act or a provision thereof shall operate notwithstanding a provision included in section 2 or sections 7 to 15 of this Charter. (2) An Act or a provision of an Act in respect of which a declaration made under this section is in effect shall have such operation as it would have but for the provision of this Charter referred to in the declaration. (3) A declaration made under subsection (1) shall cease to have effect five years after it comes into force or on such earlier date as may be specified in the declaration.(4) Parliament or the legislature of a province may re-enact a declaration made under subsection (1).(5) Subsection (3) applies in respect of a re-enactment made under subsection (4).

Citation 34. This Part may be cited as the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. “We must now establish the basic principles, the basic values and beliefs which hold us together as Canadians so that beyond our regional loyalties there is a way of life and a system of values which make us proud of the country that has given us such freedom and such immeasurable joy.”

November/ December 2021

23.(1) Citizens of Canada (a) whose first language learned and still understood is that of the English or French linguistic minority population of the province in which they reside, or (b) who have received their primary school instruction in Canada in English or French and reside in a province where the language in which they received that instruction is the language of the English or French linguistic minority population of the province, have the right to have their children receive primary and secondary school instruction in that language in that province. (2) Citizens of Canada of whom any child has received or is receiving primary or secondary school instruction in English or French in Canada, have the right to have all their children receive primary and secondary school instruction in the same language. (3) The right of citizens of Canada under subsections (1) and (2) to have their children receive primary and secondary school instruction in the language of the English or French linguistic minority population of a province (a) applies wherever in the province the number of children of citizens who have such a right is sufficient to warrant the provision to them out of public funds of minority language instruction; and (b) includes, where the number of those children so warrants, the right to have them receive that instruction in minority language educational facilities provided out of public funds.

24.(1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances. (2) Where, in proceedings under subsection (1),a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms guaranteed by this Charter, the evidence shall be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all the circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.

P.E. Trudeau 1981


Attention: David Eby, Attorney General of BC RE: Urgent Legal Matters Copied to: John Horgan, Premier of BC Premier@gov. Adrian Dix, Health Minister of BC Dr. Bonnie Henry, PHO Bonnie.Henry@ Via Email October 1, 2021

N o v e m b e r / D e c e m b e r 2021

RE: Urgent Legal Matters


Dear Sir, As this province continues to plummet into crisis, discord and medical chaos, I write to serve notice to you that your conduct (or lack thereof), specifically as it relates to your statutory duties as Chief law enforcement officer for the province of British Columbia, can no longer be ignored. The office of the Attorney General has obligations not only to the Lieutenant Governor, the Executive Council, and the administration of justice; but also, most importantly, to the people of British Columbia. As Attorney General, either you have failed in your duties to properly advise the Executive Council or they have failed to listen. You are duty bound to have availed yourself of the vast amount of COVID related information, from all reliable sources—not just those convenient to one narrative. You are duty bound, as legal advisor, to inform the Executive Counsel when their orders, or orders issued by those empowered by statute to make orders, infringe without lawful justification on the rights of those living in British Columbia. These rights include not only our Charter Rights, but also those found in the BC Human Rights Code—a Code with which you, as former head of the BC Civil Liberties Association, are very familiar. In your capacity as AG, you are duty bound to inform yourself about the research, good and bad, associated with experimental drug programs like the one that is currently masquerading under the misleading label of being a ‘vaccine’. This fraud—that is being forced on the population of BC through coercion, abuse of power, assault and battery, as well as misinformation and deceit—must cease. There is no denying this reality. Distressingly, for Dr. Bonnie Henry, Minister Dix, the Premier and others, there is too much reliable information from medical professionals, scientist and other jurisdictions now available to allow this insidious and dangerous experiment to continue. Most reasonable British Columbians can easily affirm the growing skepticism, anger and failed confidence in those who ostensibly conned and coerced the populace into a false narrative with manufactured statistics and misinformation designed to force participation in a mass social experiment masquerading as a ‘pandemic’… As you know, there are certain laws that protect Canadians from those who abuse their public office and

the public’s trust. Section 122 of the Criminal Code of Canada is one of those, it states: Breach of trust by public officer 122. Every official who, in connection with the duties of his office, commits fraud or a breach of trust is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, whether or not the fraud or breach of trust would be an offence if it were committed in relation to a private person.… The Attorney General Act of BC states: The Attorney General (a) is the official legal adviser of the Lieutenant Governor and the legal member of the Executive Council, (b) must see that the administration of public affairs is in accordance with law, Your accountability doesn’t stop there. As mentioned above, Section 2(b) of the Attorney General Act demands that you ensure that the administration of public affairs in BC is “in accordance with the law.” Clearly, you have failed on this front, too; and our province is paying the price. As AG you are also responsible for the lawful administration of the BC Human Rights Code and the protections therein. Section 3(1) of the BC Human Rights Code demands that you ensure that the purposes of that Code are actuated; specifically the purposes of the Code, which are: (a) to foster a society in British Columbia in which there are no impediments to full and free participation in the economic, social, political and cultural life of British Columbia; (b) to promote a climate of understanding and mutual respect where all are equal in dignity and rights; (c) to prevent discrimination prohibited by this Code; (d) to identify and eliminate persistent patterns of inequality associated with discrimination prohibited by this Code; (e) to provide a means of redress for those persons who are discriminated against contrary to this Code. (f) and (g) [Repealed 2002-62-2.] Section 4 of the Code provides protection to all British Columbians from oppressive orders, edicts or other “enactments” made by “public officers” or anyone else, designed to violate, trespass, neutralize, oppress, coerce or deny British Columbians from freely participating in the “economic, social, political and cultural life…” in British Columbia. Section 4 states: If there is a conflict between this Code and any other enactment, this Code prevails. As you are aware, our laws are not made in ignorance. As British Columbians we acknowledge that our right to engage, without impediment in our civil society is a protected right. Our protected right to full participation, including going to restaurants without declaring our status within an experimental program, trumps the oppressive and unlawful orders of Dr. Bonnie Henry (a public official within the meaning of Section 122 of the Criminal Code of Canada). In closing, please also consider the requirement in section 3(1)(e).

It is time that a properly-funded and staffed entity is available to those seeking redress. The BC Human Rights Tribunal (BCHRT) has been recognized as being unfair and partial, and the current situation of backlog is denying British Columbians access to justice. This must change. Those members assigned to hear matters can no longer be driven by their political ideology or personal agendas. Instead, a proper application of the law must be the determiner in matters brought before the Tribunal. Lastly, there is no argument available at this point to justify the conduct of Dr. Bonny Henry. The dangers and harm associated with the ‘vaccine’ indisputably outweigh the benefits, most critically where children are involved. This devastatingly harmful social, psychological and medical experiment must cease, or appropriate consequences will be sought. The Crown, under your administration is compromised. Your compliance and deficiency of action in your duties inspires no confidence in your performance as AG. As you know the Criminal Code of Canada provides the people of Canada with the ability to bypass the Crown. I have enough evidence in my possession to justify the laying of Private Information charges on numerous public officers. If you fail to act immediately, I will proceed with a Private Information and if successful I will seek a special prosecutor in this circumstance. My witness list of experts is impressive, and the stories of those harmed compelling. It is time to end the insidious lunacy, assaults (battery), abuse and the unlawful conduct of “public officials.” I implore the Executive Council to initiate an immediate pause on all COVID related orders, expand their advisory base and meet with those health care professionals who are better informed, independent and balanced in their knowledge of COVID, COVID testing, COVID treatments, immunization, immunization protocols and chemicals—and other unknown substances being injected into the bodies of those you are responsible for protecting. I am attaching THE COVID-19 CANADIAN COVID CARE ALLIANCE (CCCA) DECLARATION, published September 24, 2021. I believe you can easily access the necessary experts through this organization to give you a better-informed and balanced understanding of COVID related matters. Please act in a timely manner, enough damage has been done. Sincerely yours, Original signed by: Kari Simpson Executive Director, Culture Guard Campaign Chair Suite #101 22678 – 28th Avenue, Langley BC, Canada V2Z 3B2 Phone: 604 277-2201 Email: CultureGuard@ Website: The above is part of a seven page letter which can be seen in full via website:

resourcedirectory ART & MUSIC



Lynn McGown singing teacher / vocal coaching


604-734-5881 Now at our new location to 3035 West Broadway (Formerly Calhoun’s)

Do you love to sing in the shower only to clam up if you think other people are listening? Discover your own voice and full potential of your talent with Lynn McGown. We all have our own unique voice. Through breathing and body awareness techniques, vocal warm-ups and lots of singing, you are guided

the best place to be

to discover a powerful and authentic sound LYNN MCGOWN to build your confidence, energy level, wellCall to set up lesson being and health. All lessons are individually tel. 604-222-4113 We offer frequency bonuses, three of listings, and a wide range of categories tailored: from shy beginners to professional performance coaching. Register for Tovocal book your listing email: workshops (last Sunday of each month) and/ or one-on-one vocal singing coaching.

RESTAURANTS “East Is East is a place where you are encouraged to talk to your neighbours. This is definitely not the Ritz, but it certainly is Kits. From plumbers to publishers, hippies to generation whatever, this place has special appeal.” - Owen Williams, Common Ground Visit our other location 4433 Main Street @ 28th 604-879-2020

T h e


Now open for dine-in takeout & delivery!

Est. 1969

The Naam Vegetarian Restaurant For years voted “Best Vegetarian” in the Georgia Straight and in Vancouver Magazine’s “Readers’ Choice”. Open seven days a week, licensed, wood fireplace, heated patio. 2724 West 4th Ave. 604-738-7151.

NUTRITION Consultation with dietitian/author Vesanto Melina. ($295 for 2-1/2 hours) includes personalized nutritional analysis; recipes; menu planning. For busy people; pregnancy; children, seniors. 778-379-5377

Lead author of Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics’ current vegetarian position paper; and of award books on plant-based nutrition Becoming Vegan: Comprehensive Edition; Becoming Vegan: Express Edition; plus the very new Kick Diabetes Cookbook, all with Brenda Davis. Online & at bookstores.

HEALTH & HEALING Wellspring Vision Improvement Program

Making a positive difference

Dr. Weidong Yu

Wellspring Vision Improvement Program (WVIP) was developed in 1999 by Dr. Weidong Yu, a world renowned Doctor of Traditional Chinese Medicine. WVIP is a comprehensive Holistic health program based on Chinese herbal medicine, Acupuncture, Acupressure, Qigong, Food and Nutrition. WVIP may be

beneficial for patients with conditions such as: * Retinitis Pigmentosa * Macular degeneration * Glaucoma * Eye Bleeding

* Red eyes, Dry eyes * Eye fatigue * Far sightedness * Blurry Vision

INTUITIVE ARTS DR. ANNE MCMURTRY Channelled Readings, Reiki & Crystal Healing ANNE’S ABILITY opens a line of communication between you and your spiritual guides allowing them to speak directly to you. Reiki and crystal healings and workshops are also available. 604-734-8219 VANCOUVER

For appointment, please call 604-737-7876 Dr. Weidong Yu, Dr.TCM Wellspring Clinic 916 West King Edward Ave. (south east corner of King Edward Mall at Oak & King Edward) Vancouver, BC

BUSINESS SERVICES Gentle Choices for Eco-friendly Families: Cloth diapers, Baby Carriers, Baby Gifts, Cloth Diaper Trial Program, Gift Certificates, Workshops & much more. Shop Online. NEW LOCATION: Country Club Centre, 9-3200 North Island Highway, Nanaimo Cristi Lundman: 250-585-5552

If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough. – Albert Einstein PSYCHOLOGY, THERAPY & COUNSELLING


Therapy of the Whole Person John Arnold Ph.D. Therapist / Counselor since 1975


Lorraine Milardo Bennington, success coach, psychologist and hypnotherapist, has been practising hypnosis for over 30 years and skillfully integrates intuition and hypnotherapy into her coaching and counselling practice. Lorraine gently guides people in the process of transformation, assisting them to connect

with their higher selves and to reclaim joy and personal power in their lives. Lorraine has returned to Vancouver after 10 years living, studying and working on Kauai and Maui. Most Ext.Med. plans reimburse psychologists’ fees. 778-331-8860 |

Only by Working With the Whole Person Can You Achieve Truly Permanent and Effective Change.

is because you have not gotten to the root causes. Completion of any problem comes only when you have resolved your issues physically, emotionally, mentally and spiritually and the underlying reasons for repetitive patterns of behavior are uncovered and

resolved. If you are fed up and want to do something radical about your predicament, give me a call at 604-261-2788 email: or visit my web page at

If problems and issues keep popping up in your life and you are STILL STUCK, it

N r /eDpet ce emmb be er r 2 20 02 21 1 A uo gv eu m s tb/e S

Lorraine Milardo Bennington M.Ed. (Counselling) Reg. Psychologist #815

YOU CAN OVERCOME LIMITING BELIEFS AND OPEN UP TO YOUR JOY! Success Coaching Hypnotherapy - Weight Loss, Stop Smoking, Athletic Performance, Blocks to Success/Fear of Failure, Age Regression, Anxiety, Phobias. Couples Counselling

21 11

Parents – Protect Your Children

G By Ted Kuntz

overnments have declared their intention to inject every human on the planet with experimental COVID biological products regardless of risks. This callous disregard for risk is evident with the recent decision to market COVID-19 products to children ages 5–11 years. The scientific evidence is clear that children are not at risk from COVID-19; nor are they transmitters of the disease. The risk-benefit analysis confirms the risk from these injected biological products significantly exceeds any benefit.

N o v e m b e r / D e c e m b e r 2021

Key Considerations


1. All COVID-19 Biological Products are Experimental COVID-19 biological products were made available under an ‘interim order’ for emergency use only. These injections utilize novel mRNA and DNA viralvector technology. This technology has not received full regulatory approval for use in humans. This technology is still considered experimental. The treatments being marketed as COVID-19 “vaccines” are in Phase III clinical trials until 2022/2023, and hence qualify as a medical experiment. People taking these biological products are subjects in human trials. There is limited short-term safety data. It is impossible to infer long-term safety based on such limited information. The potential for late-onset effects, such as the development of autoimmune diseases, cancer, neurological disorders and infertility, is highly relevant for children and young people who have a lifetime ahead of them. These potentialities need to be fully assessed before proceeding. “The scientific uncertainties demand that the administration of COVID-19 vaccines, especially to children, adolescents, and young adults of child- bearing age, not even be considered until proper scientific studies that focus on the safety and pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of the vaccines and the vaccine-encoded spike protein can be conducted.” The Case against Mandatory Vaccines Canadian COVID Care Alliance 2. Childhood Risk of COVID-19 is Effectively Zero The overall survival rate of children diagnosed with COVID-19 is 99.99996%. An experimental biological product cannot be expected to be safer than a disease with a survival rate that is effectively one hundred percent. With serious adverse events recognized (e.g. myocarditis and pericarditis), and further suspected adverse effects, children face higher risks from these biological products than from the disease itself. Given the lack of safety data, the uncertainty of benefit and the known risks to health, it is inconceivable

that a child could provide informed consent. In spite of this, governments are registering children ages 5 – 11 years. 3. COVID Injections do not prevent infection or transmission According to Health Canada’s Summary Basis of Decision, updated May 20, 2021, the clinical trials have not proven that the COVID-19 biological products prevent infection or transmission. The Summary also reports that both Moderna and Pfizer identified six areas of missing information (limited/no clinical data): use in paediatric (age 0- 18) populations; use in pregnant and breastfeeding women; long-term safety; long-term efficacy including “realworld use”; safety and immunogenicity in subjects with immune-suppression; and concomitant administration of non-COVID vaccines. There is no community health benefit to receiving these biological products and no rational reason to insist on these products to “protect others”. Any claim that grandma is protected by her grandchild taking these injected products is false.

ɶɶ COVID-19 biological products have the worst safety record in the history of vaccination. 4. Natural Immunity vs. Injected Immunity In populations which are at minimal risk of severe complications from the disease, such as children and young people, an individual is better protected by natural immunity which is comprehensive and long lasting. Even if biological product-induced benefit occurs, the effect is temporary and does not provide the full spectrum of immune protection available with natural exposure. It is naturally acquired immunity that benefits the community by contributing to “herd” immunity. 
 Safe and effective treatments and prophylactic/preventive measures exist for COVID-19 in support of natural immune response. That effective treatments exist negates the need for a “vaccine”. More than 79 countries allow access to these treatments. This is not the case in Canada where our provincial and federal governments deny Canadians access to these life-saving treatments. Canadians have been unnecessarily harmed and killed due to the action of our governments and health authorities to prevent the early treatment and prevention of COVID-19. 5. Vaccine Risk There is substantial concern that COVID-19 “vaccines” worsen disease due to antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). ADE was observed in animal trials during previous attempts to develop mRNA vaccines

against coronaviruses. ADE may explain the increasing rate of ‘break through cases’ in the “vaccinated”. The reporting databases in the US (VAERS), Europe (Eudravigilance) and the UK (MHRA Yellow Card System), have documented hundreds of thousands of vaccine-related illnesses and deaths since the COVID-19 “vaccine” rollout in December 2020. There is now “more than enough evidence … to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans”. Dr. Tess Lawrie - Evidence Based Medicine Consultancy Reported adverse events include seizures, paralysis, blindness, strokes, blood clots and acute cardiac events. Life-threatening effects, such as blood clots and myocarditis have been reported in young people. COVID-19 biological products have the worst safety record in the history of vaccination. Scientists have raised multiple concerns regarding short and long-term adverse effects of the spike protein, a recognized pathogen. It is unknown how much spike protein is produced by the injections and for how long. It is plausible that younger, healthier people may produce higher quantities, thus potentially increasing the risk of negative effects. An escalating number of reports of myocarditis are reported to health authorities, especially in teenagers and young adults, following the mRNA Covid19 injections. This is especially prevalent in young males. Children’s Hospitals across Canada have recently established paediatric stroke teams to address the increasing incidence of stroke in children and adolescents. “Unlike other drugs, vaccines are given to healthy individuals. We therefore should be far less tolerant of risk. We need to be especially attentive to risks in children about whom there is almost no relevant safety information. Children, after all, have almost no risk from the disease [COVID] and so any risk from the vaccine is unacceptable.” Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Children’s Health Defense Myocarditis following COVID-19 injections are 30-200x the normal background risk, as shown in a recent presentation by the US CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Myocarditis carries a long-term risk of heart failure. It also requires restricted exercise for life and medication for several months after recovery. Following testimony by medical experts, lawyers, and scientists, the Rabbinical Court made the following decree on October 26, 2021: “It is absolutely forbidden to administer or even to promote this injection to children, adolescents, young men or women; It is an explicit obligation to protest against this mandate, and anyone who can prevent the injection from being

forced upon our youth must do so, forthrightly and emphatically.” The safety of this experimental biological treatment should have been thoroughly investigated before mass injection, and most especially use in children. 6. Lack of Independent Oversight The implementation of the COVID-19 biological injection program is in complete incongruence with the principle of evidence-based medicine, the gold standard of good clinical practice. 
Contrary to established medical practice, recommendations for the use of these biological treatments have been based only on interim analyses of data from incomplete clinical safety trials rather than on peer-reviewed published science. Ongoing trials to establish efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 injections are not being conducted by independent research teams. Instead, the trials are conducted by the pharmaceutical companies that gain financially from the sale of their products. This is a direct moral hazard.

ɶɶ People taking these biological products are subjects in human trials. Raw trial data are not available for public and independent scrutiny. Interim analyses and claims are communicated by press release and trotted out as medical certainty to the public. Public health agencies and the vaccine industry are liable for false advertising, fraud, malfeasance, and lack of scientific integrity. The media is disseminating information that has not been independently verified. These issues demand a cautious approach to giving COVID-19 injections to young, healthy people. “We are writing to you again to plead that you oppose authorizing COVID products for our children and youth. Such authorization is likely to result in a public health disaster, for years to come, and of a magnitude that is hard to anticipate.” An open letter to Ontario Premier Doug Ford Canadian COVID Care Alliance

8. Parental Responsibility to Make Medical Decisions for their Children Current public health policy permits children as young as five to receive this experimental product without the knowledge or consent of their parents. This undermines parental rights and their responsibility to make medical decisions for their children. These policies impede the ability of parents to protect their children from government and corporate overreach and regulatory capture. It is irresponsible, predatory, and criminal to coerce children 12 years and younger to make significant life altering decisions that could have serious long-term medical consequences. Children are incapable of making an informed decision due to the complexity of the subject matter. These decisions and responsibilities must rest with the parents.


CALL TO ACTION Humanity is at a critical juncture because collectively we have failed to grasp the significance of the events unfolding around us and to respond accordingly. There is little argument that governments globally have exceeded their delegated authority. To permit this unfettered abuse of power is to risk losing the natural rights and freedoms that are the heritage of all people and the foundation of free and just societies. History reveals that rights and freedoms are never returned willingly. Rather, it is the oppressed themselves who ultimately reclaim and preserve human rights that benefit humanity. We have a responsibility to protect and preserve our rights and freedoms, not only for ourselves, but for all future generations. It is time for Canadians to rise up, speak up and stand firm against tyrannical orders to ensure that future generations may thrive in freedom, health and happiness. 1. AFFIRM YOUR RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS Read, sign and share the Victoria Declaration.

• There is no medical or ethical justification to expose children to these experimental biological injections. • Children are not at risk of COVID, are non-transmitters, and the mortality rate in children is statistically zero. • Governments have acted fraudulently and must immediately cease and desist the injection of these experimental biological products in children. • Parents must stand up and protect their children from government fraud, coercion, deception and malfeasance.

Suggested links for those wishing to explore these topics more fully:


Visit the Freedom Rising website. Learn about the organizations and individuals standing up for freedom. Support their efforts.


Review the information on the Constitutional Rights Centre website and subscribe to their newsletter -

Vaccine Choice Canada is Canada’s oldest and most respected vaccine risk awareness organization, serving Canadians since 1982. VCC is leading the effort to protect your right to medical choice. Become a member of Vaccine Choice Canada today. 5. FREEDOM IN ACTION

For a listing of current Freedom in Action initiatives visit:


Vaccine Choice Canada Canada Health Alliance Americas Frontline Doctors Great Barrington Declaration Constitutional Rights Centre The Persecution of Canadian Physicians by Organized Medicine


November/ December

7. Elements of Informed Consent The Nuremberg Code, to which Canada is a signatory, states that voluntary informed consent is essential before performing medical experiments on human beings. Persons involved should have the legal capacity to give consent, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved so as to enable him/her to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This requires that there should be made known to him/her the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be con-

ducted; all inconveniences and hazards to be reasonably expected; and the effects upon his/her health or person which may possibly come from participation in the experiment. There is no indication that subjects in this human experiment are provided with the legally and ethically required information. Instead, participants are compelled to partake in this experiment through the use of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion such as the loss of livelihood. Such compulsion is illegal, immoral and criminal.


The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health


By Kathleen Schmidt s director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Dr. Anthony Fauci dispenses $6.1 billion in annual taxpayer-provided funding for scientific research, allowing him to dictate the subject, content, and outcome of scientific health research across the globe. Fauci uses the financial clout at his disposal to wield extraordinary influence over hospitals, universities, journals, and thousands of influential doctors and scientists—whose careers and institutions he has the power to ruin, advance, or reward. During more than a year of painstaking and meticulous research, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. unearthed a shocking story that oblit-

Wide selection of used books In all categories. Some choice esoteric and occult material. All 50% off the current retail price. Visit us for the best bargains around.


N o v e m b e r / D e c e m b e r 2021

2306 W. Broadway @ Vine (in Kits) 604-736-8876

erates media spin on Dr. Fauci …and that will alarm every American—Democrat or Republican—who cares about democracy, our Constitution, and the future of our children’s health. The Real Anthony Fauci reveals how “America’s Doctor” launched his career during the early AIDS crisis by partnering with pharmaceutical companies to sabotage safe and effective off-patent therapeutic treatments for AIDS. Fauci orchestrated fraudulent studies, and then pressured US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulators into approving a deadly chemotherapy treatment he had good reason to know was worthless against AIDS. Fauci repeatedly violated federal laws to allow his Pharma partners to use impoverished and dark-skinned children as lab rats

The most antiques, collectables and movie props in the GVRD

604-759-1422 Or Visit 605 Front St, Old New Westminster, BC two blocks from Columbia Sky Train Station



in deadly experiments with toxic AIDS and cancer chemotherapies. In early 2000, Fauci shook hands with Bill Gates in the library of Gates’ $147 million Seattle mansion, cementing a partnership that would aim to control an increasingly profitable $60 billion global vaccine enterprise with unlimited growth potential. Through funding leverage and carefully cultivated personal relationships with heads of state and leading media and social media institutions, the Pharma-Fauci-Gates alliance exercises dominion over global health policy. The Real Anthony Fauci details how Fauci, Gates, and their cohorts use their control of media outlets, scientific journals, key government and quasi-governmental agencies, global intelligence agencies, and influential scientists and physicians to flood the public with fearful propaganda about COVID-19 virulence and pathogenesis, and to muzzle debate and ruthlessly censor dissent. Tony Lyons, Publisher of Skyhorse, said, “Complex scientific and moral problems are not resolved through censorship of dissenting opinions, deleting content from the internet, or defaming scientists and authors who present information challenging to those in power. Censorship leads instead to greater distrust of both government institutions and large corporations. There is no ideology or politics in pointing out the obvious: scientific errors and public policy errors do occur—and can have devastating consequences. Errors might result from flawed analysis, haste, arrogance, and sometimes, corruption. Whatever the cause, the solutions come from open-minded exploration, introspec-

tion, and constant review. Ideally, science and public policy are never static. They are a process, a collaboration, a debate, and a partnership. If powerful people challenged by this book claim it contains misinformation, our response is simply this: Tell us where you believe something is incorrect, make your best arguments, and offer the best available support for those arguments. We encourage and invite dialogue, criticism, engagement—and every suggestion will be heard and considered. Since The Real Anthony Fauci is being published in the middle of rapidly unfolding events, and since censorship and suppression of information is underway, it’s best to approach this book as a living document. When new information emerges that can add to or improve the thousands of ref-

ɶɶ Thoroughly researched, one of the most important investigative books of 2021. erences and citations in this book, updates, additional notes, and new references will be provided via the QR codes that appear throughout the book. We’ve published authors with views on all sides of many controversies. That’s what we do, because at its best, publishing is a town square that lets everyone be heard— and lets everyone else listen, if they choose to. I can go several steps further, knowing from my inside view how principled and careful Bobby is as an author—and how painstakingly this book was researched.” The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health (Children’s Health Defense) By Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Author) Publisher: Skyhorse (November 16, 2021) Language: English Hardcover: 480 pages

Windbags on the Wing A.I. inflatable pilots to replace the vaccine resistant


Satire by Geoff Olson

fter suspending more than 800 employees without pay for not being fully vaccinated against COVID-19, Air Canada promises any vacant captains’ seats will be filled with Artificial Intelligence-driven inflatable pilots. “We’ve had this project on the drawing board for a while now,” said Air Canada CEO Frank Peanutpack in a panel discussion at the National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C. on Tuesday. “The AI pilots will be fully equal in skill sets to the personnel we have summarily dismissed.” “We don’t enjoy having to let go hundreds of airline employees, but an unvaccinated pilot or flight attendant is a menace to themselves and everything else in the air… yes, birds too.” The panelists nodded sagely while the CEO described the seriousness of the situation. Almost all the airline’s 27,000 pilots, flight attendants and

Call for a Free Estimate


Organic, Chemical-Free Lawn Care Garden Installation & Maintenance Call for a Free Estimate Organic, Chemical-Free Lawn Care Garden Installation & Maintenance

November/ December

other employees have had both shots, he said. “Air Canada employees have done their bit, and now over 96 per cent have been fully vaccinated. We believe we can handle the minor losses without sacrificing quality service. That said, our inflatable, AI-driven pilots are arriving at a fortuitous time.” Peanutpack expects to see the first autonomous, inflatable pilots galumphing across the tarmac by late January. A number of American airline executives and pilots gathered at the event (“COVID, Robotics and the Future of Flight”) expressed skepticism that the public is ready for advanced windbags to pilot them through the skies, safely or otherwise. “Surely you can’t be serious,” said Roger Wilco, a former Delta airlines flight trainer. “I am serious,” replied Peanutpack. “And don’t call me Shirley.” Challenged by a NPR reporter about an October test flight in Labrador that ended with an AI inflatable roughly landing a DC-9, Peanutpack countered, “It wasn’t the AI’s fault. It wasn’t

the programmer’s fault. It was the asphalt.” He added that development in airplane engineering is typically slow because “everyone is afraid to make a ground breaking design.” Air Canada employees, already reeling from the company’s vaccine mandates, will undoubtably be relieved to hear the AI pilots, which have a valve in the groin area, will not require oral servicing to inflate. “We have onboard mechanical fellators for that,” said Peanutpack. “But airline personnel will need to carry puncture kits while in flight. The AI pilots, unlike their human counterparts, must not be pricked.” In spite of Peanutpack’s efforts to limit the discussion to technology, the panelists insisted on returning to the topic of vaccines, testing the CEO’s patience. “Look, I’ve heard talk of myocardia, tachycardia, La Guardia, and frankly I’m tired of these unsupported rumours of vaccine-related deaths and injuries. If any of this was true or newsworthy, our Covidian Broadcasting Corporation would be on top of it.” Peanutpack added that his wife is actually a flight engineer and was “responsibly” vaccinated seven times. “Doreen’s a trooper. She’s been a damn pin cushion for Big Pharma, but mRNA technology hasn’t made her grow a tail or turned her into a vegetable, I assure you. She’s felt a little unwell recently, but that’s all.” “It’s unfortunate that a tiny fraction of the Air Canada community fell prey to inflated concerns about their health, and refused to exchange their bodily autonomy for a paycheck. Well, perhaps the experience of working in cramped spaces filled with hungry, immobilized strangers will serve them well in their future internment camps.” He added that given the resurgence of Delta, all fully vaccinated Air Canada employees will have to submit to nasal shwabs, anal shwabs, and World Economic Forum cofounder Karl Schwab. After much jab-related discussion, the CEO welcomed questions from the audience about Air Canada’s plans for advanced flight systems. When asked about persistent rumours that the airline is working in conjunction with the Canadian government on invisible passenger planes, he replied, “I just can’t see it.” The panel ended rather suddenly with Peanutpack taking a tense call on his iPhone. “I’m sorry, but there’s been an emergency with Doreen. I must leave for the hospital.” “Hospital? What is it?” asked a concerned panelist, as the Air Canada CEO quickly gathered up his notes. “It’s a big building with patients, but that’s not important right now,” Peanutpack curtly replied.






VIFF orga nic Clim ate arso Pure n wat er for Our hom life e ON nati ve land Will iam BC’s Sha tner men tal hea Turn er, one lth maz coo e l guy 1944 -201 7

Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.