Are you happy with what is happening to our small businesses?
Sadly small businesses have been forced to comply with a government narrative and suffered great loss during Covid-19, but all of that can end today! Please take our survey at:
Copies of Common Ground magazine NOW available for distribution right across Canada! Call 604-569-9992 or email email@example.com
SPECIAL NATIONAL EDITION
in this issue
right across Canada
Mandatory masking and vaccines lack efficacy and would be harmful to students and staff at UBC Steven Pelech, Ph.D.
Daniel Ellsberg & Edward Snowden, a conversation
Huxley’s Brave New World had Soma. What’s Canada’s Joseph Roberts, Common Ground
Dispatches from the Vaccine Wars: Fighting for Human Freedom During the Great Reset Amy L. Newhook
22 Government data exposes pandemic lies Anonymous UBC Scientist
COVID-19 and the shadowy “Trusted News Initiative” Elizabeth Woodworth
23 Are vaccinations causing high excess mortality in British Columbia Alex Posoukh
11 Where covid came from and who funded its creation: follow the patents and the money David E. Martin, PhD 17 What works and what doesn’t when it comes to masks Chris Schaefer 18 Say No to Medical Apartheid Ted Kuntz 21 Finding the Courage to Break the Spell Julius Ruechel
Welcome to Interesting Times
cover design: Kris Kozak art work :Geoff Olson
with special thanks to Heritage Canada, Canada Periodical Fund, Special Measures for Journalism
Accounting - Maggie Si Layout & Production - David Bolton Contributors: Steven Pelech, Geoff Olson, Kim Hunter, Daniel Ellsberg, Edward Snowden, Chris Shaw, Amy L Newhook, Elizabeth Woodworth, David E Martin, Rosemary Barker, Dean Darling, Tom Crean, Henry Urion, Chris Schaefer, Ted Kuntz, Julius Ruechel, Anonymous Scientist, Mary Etey, Bruce Bingham, Seva Roberts, Alan Cassels, Alex Posoukh, and special thanks to George Orwell Editorial, Distribution Inquiries, Management & Advertising Tel. 604-569-9992 firstname.lastname@example.org Publications Mail Agreement No. 40011171 Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to Circulation Dept., Head office ISSN No. 0824-0698 Head Office Common Ground Publishing Corp. 3152 West 8th Ave. Vancouver, BC V6K 2C3 Reach Common Ground’s great audience now right across Canada Over 300,000 readers per issue.. Survey shows 3 - 4 readers/copy, plus online at www.commonground.ca and our Facebook link. 100% owned and operated by Canadians. Published 8 times a year in Canada. Annual subscription is $75 (US$75) for one year (12 issues). Single issues are $6 (specify issue #). Payable by cheque, Visa, MasterCard, Interac or money order. Printed on recycled paper with vegetable inks. All contents copyrighted. Written permission from the publisher is required to reproduce, quote, reprint, or copy any material from Common Ground. Opinions and views expressed in the articles do not necessarily reflect those of the publishers or advertisers. Common Ground Publishing Corp. neither endorses nor assumes any liability for any and all products or services advertised or within editorial content. Furthermore, healthrelated content is not intended as medical advice and in no way excludes the necessity of an opinion from a health professional. Advertisers are solely responsible for their claims.
Special thanks to all those unmentioned who made this first ever across Canada edition possible. You know who you are. Thank you from the Common Ground Team, the existing readers, and all the new reads who will discover Common Ground for the first time ever!
mbbeerr 2 20 02 21 1 AAuugguusstt // SSeepptteem
ou hold in your hands the first, truly national edition of Common Ground magazine. It is our response to the weirdly ever-manipulated hacking of our culture by Big Pharma & Friends. It dawned on me slowly. Either government did not know what they were doing, or, even worse, a very few elite at the top of the charade knew exactly what they wanted to accomplish, and did it to us. Sorry folks, it really was not for our own good. For a year and a half we, unsuspecting trusting people, have been marinated in a malignant dis-empowering lie. I. F. Stone warned us “All governments lie”. Sad but true. So slowly we came to realize that Canadians had been duped into believe their pharma fairy-tale. Some how, and they still won’t tell us how it began, that nature had turned against us. That the only, and final solution was their new patented GMO products which they were in the process of financing, developing, sort-of-testing, and marketing the hell out of. Political bosses bought in and their minions followed; or were bought out. By repeating the same lies, and harassing opposing narratives, they managed to fool us, then rob us blind while we were blinded by fear. We were confused. We wanted to believe big brother-sister really cared about us. Well, that time is now over. They fooled all the people some of the time, even some of the people all the time, but now not all the people. That time has come. This special edition contains the antidote for their lies.
Publisher & Senior Editor - Joseph Roberts
Mandatory masking and vaccines lack efficacy and would be harmful to students and staff at UBC
by Steven Pelech, Ph.D. n Aug 25, 2021 Steven Pelech wrote to Al Richardson the president of the UBC Faculty Association regarding their consideration of mandatory mask wearing and vaccinations of staff and students at UBC.
Dr. Richardson, Further to my August 9th email to you, I, and many of my Faculty of Medicine colleagues are very dismayed at the stance that you and others in the executive of the UBC Faculty Association have taken about calling for a mandatory vaccine mandate for all students, staff and faculty. This call is not really driven by evidence-based science and is likely to be harmful both physically and psychologically to the UBC community. University professors should be setting the example to the broad community that critical thinking and the exercise of responses based on scientific evidence should prevail over hysteria and fear that is propagated by social and mainstream media. lear evidence is rapidly mounting that: the vaccines are losing their efficacy (most cases of COVID-19 now in highly vaccinated countries are in the
vaccinated population); there is no clear evidence that SARS-CoV-2 supports the spread from unvaccinated people to vaccinated people any more than vaccinated to vaccinated people; more than half of the population in B.C. already has natural immunity, which is superior to that obtained by vaccination; the delta variant is more infectious, but apparently no more lethal than earlier strains; and there is mounting evidence for significant short-term term injury and high potential for long-term injury with autoimmune diseases. Morbidity and mortality for people under 29 years of age with COVID-19 is not that much different from those under 18 years in B.C. The overall survival rate of minors (under the age of 19 years) with COVID-19 is 99.997%. Data from the US CDC indicates that for 12 to 17 years old, from March 1, 2020 to April 24, 2021 in 14 US states, COVID-19 adolescent hospitalization rates varied from 0.6 to 2.1 per 100,000, but without any recorded deaths (https://www.cdc. gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7023e1. htm). As of July 30, 2021, only the Pfizer RNA vaccine had received emergency authorization use in the US for adolescents aged 12-17 years. Another review by CDC of the data from the v-safe program (a smartphone-based safety
East is East 3035 West Broadway
August / September
Steven Pelech, Ph.D. is a Professor, Division of Neurology,Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia.Senate Representative for Faculty of Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies.
Sales Professional Wanted
East is East 3035 West Broadway East is East in Kitsilano
3035 West Broadway in Kitsilano
es, we are passionate about natural health, environment, peace, personal growth, Y independent media, art, politics, music and culture! Motivated, skillful and honest? We are looking for the right person to earn good money by selling advertising in a magazine dedicated to awareness and real change.
Live Music www.eastiseast.ca Live Music
Organic, Chemical-Free Lawn Care Garden Installation & Maintenance
Call for a Free Estimate
Live Music 4
surveillance system) showed that out of 129,050 adolescents that were immunized, 56 were hospitalized (i.e., a rate of 43 per 100,000) (https://www.cdc. gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7031e1. htm). This supports more than 20-fold higher rate of risk of hospitalization in 12 to 17 years old from administration of the Pfizer RNA vaccine than due to the virus that it is supposed to offer protection from. Such increased risks of vaccine injury relative to COVID-19 injury would be true for university-aged students as well. Clearly in view of the actual threat posed by the SARS-CoV-2 virus in B.C., the availability of vaccines for those that wish to be vaccinated, and the issues that are rapidly becoming evident with these vaccines, and finally the violation of human rights that is being advocated by you and the rest of the UBC Faculty Association Executive, you need to be receiving much better advice regarding the position that you are taking. Respectfully, Steven Pelech, Ph.D.
Email your resume and cover letter to email@example.com
Books ~ Gifts ~ Events for Love & Wisdom & Healing
3608 West 4th Avenue, Vancouver 604-732-7912 or 1-800-663-8442 www.banyen.com
Daniel Ellsberg & Edward Snowden, a conversation On 50th anniversary of the release of the Pentagon Papers 1971-2021
With Daniel Ellsberg & Edward Snowden
DWARD SNOWDEN (ES): Daniel Ellsberg, it is a pleasure to be talking to you. You have been a friend of mine for quite some time now. You are one of the very first people after 2013 that I met in person and spent time with. You are very much an inspiration of mine. You are known for so many things. Of course, the Pentagon Papers. You are the source or author of many books including ‘Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers. And most recently ‘The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner’. Most centrally to me, you were the subject of a 2009 documentary ‘The Most Dangerous Man in America’ about what you did back during the Vietnam War, which I was watching when I was grappling with my decision to come forward back in 2012/13. So I have to say that you were, and are, quite literally, an inspiration to me. Your example changed my life and I would like to think changed the course of history for the better. So thank you for coming to speak with me today. DANIEL ELLSBERG (DE): Well, that couldn’t be more gratifying to me, Ed, because I’ve not only known you as a friend that I respect very much, but to hear the feedback that what I did actually had an influence on someone to affect their life and what they did is something that I very rarely hear actually. In terms of doing pretty much what I did, which was to put out a great deal of material, not just a page or two of document but, in my case, 7,000 pages. I waited a long time. Chelsea Manning, then Bradley, in 2010, thirty-nine years after the Pentagon Papers, was the first person to use the digital era to put out a lot of material. And then three years later you put out even more about a tremendous violation of our constitution and system of universal surveillance. I was very happy to hear, and didn’t assume at all, that it was the case that I had some influence over that. It is very heartwarming for me.
But there’s an increasing cohort of Americans that you represent — Thomas Drake, Chelsea Manning, Daniel Hale and Reality Winner. More whistleblowers are coming forward and they are limited by the system as much as the government can. I think there’s the question that needs to be asked. You’re sitting at the desk. You see a war that is being prolonged. And what is the objective? Is it worth it? We’re told that you, Daniel Ellsberg, have no place to make those decisions. But it’s for the Congress. It’s for the President. It’s for the official bureaucracy that allegedly represents us through our elections, which we know are totally unfair But the idea here is that there are people who are supposed to make those decisions, and it is not you. Yet you made this decision and history thinks that you made the right decision. How do you reconcile that? DE: The 4th of July that we celebrate now is the announcement not only of independence from Britain but a change in the government in which the king is not the sovereign anymore, and doesn’t determine by himself, or by Queen Elizabeth herself; when you go to war, how you pursue it, and how long it goes on and everything else. Actually our Article 1 Section 8 doesn’t say that Congress shares that power. It says Congress has that power. It is an unshared power of deciding whether you go to war or not. And obviously… in the last fifty years... ES: We never declare wars anymore, right… DE: So Section 1:8 of the United States Constitution is almost a dead letter at this point, but another point was the First Amendment we have that the British don’t have.
ɶɶ Congress shall make no law abridging freedom of speech or freedom of the press. Well, it just occurs to me now, to use the Espionage Act which was initially intended against spies to secretly give information to a foreign government in order to harm or advantage them, especially in time of war. But the wording of the 1917 Act, especially as amended in 1950, a very anti-Communist McCarthyite period, allowed it. The general language criminalizes actions such as you and I did, but any kind of leaking for the purpose of public benefit, not for a foreign power, but for patriotic reasons, to keep the government from doing something terribly dangerous, costly, reckless or criminal. So I think it could be said on this 4th of July, the Espionage Act so applied and so interpreted against leaks that are intended to benefit the public and so accepted by a jury that could recognize this is as antithetical to the First Amendment, the freedom of speech in the press, as the existence of slavery was antithetical on the 4th of July to the Declaration of Independence and the equality of all humans. It is a total contradiction and it strikes at the very notion of democracy. Not only could slaves not vote in 1858, but free blacks could not vote in the state of the union and of course women could not vote. So the idea of democracy here hadn’t been achieved very much yet. Over time we’ve enlarged the electorate very greatly and now the Republicans are trying to restrict it again, like the century of Jim Crow in the south after the civil war, which essentially tried to exclude or restrict black voting in the south and the Republicans are moving back on that now. But again, it is ironic that on the 4th of July we have to be recognizing not only what the ideals were that were put forward in the Declaration of Independence, but how far we are from actually doing it. So you say, why did I take it on myself at that time? continued p.6… It was very clear to me that the public
In my case, by the way, I would not have done what I did — which I did assume would subject me to life in prison if they prosecuted me, and they almost surely
ɶɶ More whistleblowers are coming forward
‘The Congress shall make no law abridging freedom of speech or freedom of the press.’ Now, let me make an analogy here that just came to my mind on the 4th of July. There’s a famous speech by Frederick Douglass, a former slave in 1858, when slavery was still on: “What to the slave means the 4th of July?” he said, on the 4th of July. He was an escaped slave himself. Pointing out that the existence of slavery was totally antithetical to the basic notion of the Declaration of Independence that we were celebrating on the 4th of July. “All men are created equal.” What could be more opposed to that notion than four million people being the property of other Americans, of white Americans. He pointed out that tremendous discrepancy.
August / September
ɶɶ After two years in Vietnam and after participating in the escalation of the war, that I saw it as wrong. That put in my mind the question of ‘what should I do’.
would do that. I wouldn’t have thought of doing that without the example of thousands of young Americans at that time, almost uniquely in any country’s history I’m not sure, but thousands of Americans who chose to go to prison rather than cooperate with the draft in a war they thought was wrong. They were doing that at a time when I’d come to realize, after two years in Vietnam and after participating in the escalation of the war in Vietnam, that I saw it as wrong just as they did. That put in my mind the question of ‘what should I do’. The thought that facing that question and acting on it can put that same question in the minds of other people I think is very good because we need more whistleblowing, and no one of course has done that more than you. ES: There’s so many questions I want to ask you. It’s amazing. You’ve worked in the government. You’ve been forced to sign all these non-disclosure agreements and made to believe that you’ll never be able to speak to somebody ever again, certainly not legally, who truly understands what you’ve been through.
…Ellsberg & Snowden, from pg. 5
did not know it had not been a matter either of public sovereignty or congressionally informed consent or decision to be conducting that war and especially moving towards enlarging it. Almost nobody recognized that was
ɶɶ it had not been a matter of public sovereignty or congressionally informed consent. happening. I had special knowledge on that because I was told by the deputy to Henry Kissinger, that this was what Nixon was planning, but I believed it. There were only three of
ɶɶ if you can’t stand lying you can’t work for the executive branch for very long us at that time who had read the 7,000 page study of our decision-making from 1945 to 1968 and could believe that a president was deceiving the public as much as they all had, and that Nixon was still doing. I was told, me and other people, on a top secret basis, and I had clearance
at that time, what Nixon’s plan was and no one believed it, that he really could be threatening nuclear war a year after the Tet Offensive had shown that the war was not winnable. Now what I did has been misunderstood. The policy I was opposing, which is still not understood, is important, because we are still enacting it in various parts of the world. And that was this: Many people have said that the lesson of the Pentagon Papers was, first, that the government lied. Okay, that’s not why I put it out, because I’d known that from the first day I worked in the government, when I heard a lot of lies, and heard the next day and… if you can’t stand lying you can’t work for the
ɶɶ people went to prison, not in the belief that the war was not winnable, but because it was wrong. executive branch for very long. True, the public didn’t know that on the whole, but that was not news. It was not shared only by me. Second, the papers showed the war was not winnable. That is the thing you see over and over again and it really gets under my skin, because it has nothing to do with my motives or what the problem was at that point. Five thousand people went to jail, and I risked it myself. Not one of us did that because we thought the war was not winnable. Everybody knew the war was not winnable by that time. By 1968 and 1969 there was hardly anybody who thought the war was winnable except
Richard Nixon. And I knew that he thought it was, crazily. And was pursuing a policy that was going to expand the war and continue it not only for one or two years but at least eight years, and get larger. Larger in the air, probably bringing the Chinese in and eventually using nuclear weapons which I knew he was considering as early as 1969. The people who went to prison did it not in the belief that the war was not winnable but because it was wrong. And in my case I realized by the end that not only had it been wrong but that it was going on and getting bigger, which people didn’t realize and still don’t to this day, because they didn’t want to hear it. They don’t like to believe they’ve been fooled. Must watch movies: The Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers is the 2009 documentary film follows Daniel Ellsberg and explores the events leading up to the 1971 release of the Pentagon Papers, exposing top-secret USA military involvement in their unjust Vietnam War. The government lied then. Today it is Afghanistan. Citizenfour is a 2014 documentary film directed by Laura Poitras, original footage doc. Snowden is a 2016 biographical thriller film directed by Oliver Stone, a wellacted movie. Both are great to watch. Edward Snowden’s autobiography Permanent Record is an intimate book where you get the true story in his own words. “A highly recommended read.” - Joseph Roberts, Common Ground. The above article is from A Conversation with Daniel Ellsberg https://edwardsnowden.substack.com/p/ ellsberg1 Daniel Hale and Reality Winner were drone whistleblowers. National Bird is a documentary that explores the drone warfare from a human perspective.
August / September
Huxley’s Brave New World had Soma. What’s Canada’s?
by Joseph Roberts, Common Ground fizer-Moderna has their obsequious, obedient, acting Prime Minister, Premiers, and Mayors. Think of them as political pimps for global drug dealers who are very generous with the self-serving tax-deductible philanthropy and arm-twisting patronage. That give us de facto Medical Colonization by the Multinational Pharmaceutical Corporations. They have captured our drug regulatory agencies, health ministries, and governments. Thus we drift toward unparalleled catastrophe... unless we become informed, associate among our peers, communicate our concerns, organize and act to protect our rights. Consider the following, see if it feels eerily familiar to what has happened over the last 500 days: Institutional Fascism (also known as systemic fascism) is a form of fascism that is embedded as normal practice within society or an organization. It can lead to such issues as discrimination in criminal justice, employment, housing, health care, political power, and education, etc.
This could also be called Normalized Fascism or Unconscious Fascism, Habitual Fascism, Socially Acceptable Fascism, Colonial Fascism, Political Fascism, Medical Fascism, or Empire / Empirical Fascism. It embodies Entitlement of one group of people over another where they feel superior or claim a difference that Entitles them to better treatment, service, rights or privileges over those they deem to be inferior or different. Generally those who hold power over others can fall into this category due to advantages their position in society or wealth affords them, advantages not shared by the poor, powerless or groups that have chosen the non-majority position. Institutional Racism (also known as systemic racism) is a form of racism embedded as normal practice within society . It can lead to systemic discrimination in criminal justice, employment, housing, health care, political power, and education. The term “institutional racism” was first coined in 1967 by Stokely Carmichael and Charles V. Hamilton who wrote that while individual racism is often identifiable because of its overt nature, institutional racism is
less perceptible because of its less overt, far more subtle nature. Institutional racism originates in the operation of established and respected forces in the society, and thus receives far less public condemnation than individual racism. Substantive Equality is one counter-balance to racism or its cousin fascism. Substantive Equality is a fundamental aspect of human rights law concerned with equitable outcomes and equal opportunities for addressing and preventing systemic discrimination in all its myriad forms. This can include discrimination between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated whereby such discrimination has lead to refusal of services, forced solitary confinement, house arrest, and enforced lockdowns on an identifiable minority that made an informed decision not to take an experimental drug, vaccine, or medical procedure. This could also be considered institutional racism or fascism where by an identifiable group of people are denied Substantive Equality. Learn about your rights and freedoms, it will serve you well.
Dispatches from the Vaccine Wars:
Fighting for Human Freedom During the Great Reset Book Review by Amy L. Newhook “One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge – even to ourselves—that we’ve been fooled.” –Carl Sagan
rofessor Christopher A. Shaw’s brilliance shines through in this captivating information powerhouse. Dispatches from the Vaccine Wars takes readers on a deep dive into the history of vaccinology, the role of vaccines in human health and sickness, and the suppression of science by regulatory bodies and the pharmaceutical cartel. Providing critical scientific evaluation of hundreds of safety and efficacy studies, Shaw pulls back the curtain on the official narrative, cloaked by mainstream hypnotic messaging: vaccines are safe and effective, trust the science, the science is settled, trust the experts. Christopher Shaw is a researcher at University of British Columbia (UBC) and the author of over 150 peer-reviewed research articles, reviews, and books. This volume due out September 2021 follows previous books by this author on Vancouver’s Olympic Games in 2010 (2008) and about neurological diseases (2017). The book provides a comprehensive overview of vaccine history, theory and an overall evaluation of many of the published studies that are used to make the claim that “the science is settled” in relation to central nervous system (CNS) injuries. As Shaw demonstrates, the reality is quite different. Having studied the neurological impacts of aluminum adjuvants contained in vaccines, Shaw further explores in detail the associated peer-reviewed scientific literature about the actions of mercury and aluminum, autoimmunity, and the potential impacts on the central nervous system in
Amy Newhook is a former Microsoft employee with 22 years of experience in corporate software. She is a parent, medical freedom advocate and Victoria chapter leader for Vaccine Choice Canada.
Other controversial topics range from a reanalysis of Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s widely vilified 1998 article, to the pronouncements of some pro-vaccine “thought” leaders vs. those in the vaccine hesitance camp. Shaw goes on to consider if some branches of medical science act more like a religion than science, particularly vaccinology whose staunchest adherents often exhibit cult-like behaviours. Such behaviours have also spread to much of the mainstream media, influencing as well politicians from various parties who may be easily stampeded into supporting what should correctly be understood as a “pharma” agenda. Shaw delves into a number of examples of fear-based campaigns that have served this agenda, from the draconian Bill 11 proposed by Education Minister Dominic Cardy of New Brunswick, to Order 376 signed by Health Minister Adrian Dix in British Columbia. These are, according to Shaw, perfect examples of rising medical fascism which has dug a deep trench in the vaccine wars . In context to such legislation, Shaw examines the concept of “state of rising medical fascism which has dug a deep trench in the vaccine wars of Canada exception”, a governance paradigm that allows governments of all stripes to use emergencies, real and imagined, to assume greater powers to further curtail civil and basic
human rights. Shaw began Dispatches from the Vaccine Wars before the emergency of Covid-19. However, the resulting pandemic served to highlight the themes that were already emerging. In his analysis, Shaw characterizes a “trifecta of fear” in which the combined weight of mainstream media, the medical establishment and bodies such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Economic Forum (WEF) have sought to impose their dystopian vision on the world. The parts played by Bill Gates and the WEF’S Klaus Schwab in emerging events are considered in detail. Dispatches from the Vaccine Wars is a heavily referenced scientific tome which may seem daunting to some readers. However, Shaw’s ability to deconstruct the safety and efficacy studies for the average reader makes this book a valuable resource. The hype around this book admittedly made me eager to get my hands on it, and after reading it there’s no question that it will remain in my library for years to come. I would recommend this book to anyone who wants to understand the wild ride we are currently on and where it may take us all. The final chapter, 'Future Tense: The Lady or the Tiger?’ details the struggle we face against an attempted global corporate coup that has captured governments around the world. Shaw explores what happens if we resist and fight back versus the inevitable degradation of human freedom if we simply submit. Far too many of our fellow citizens have submitted out of fear or the desire to recapture “normal”, whatever the latter actually was. Others continue to resist. That there will be a societal reset is certain. But a reset to what? Shaw’s final statement makes it clear that we still have a choice and that the choice has consequences: “Resist, fight back, and maybe, just maybe, preserve your world, or even better, make it the world you want it to be. If you choose the latter — accept the challenge of our age — you will act as you always dreamt you would if called forth to fight tyranny. You can become the stuff of legend that your descendants will remember with pride. In your choice, act as if your very world depends on it. It does. Act as if the lives and futures of your children, grandchildren, and seven future generations beyond you depend on it. They do. Act as if your choice of freedom or submission affects us all. It most certainly does. Choose one path, dear reader. Choose Well.” It’s time to stand up, and stand free — otherwise the next wave we experience may be one of regret for our lost freedom.
August / September
ɶɶ “Trifecta of fear” combined weight of mainstream media, the medical establishment, WHO and World Economic Forum have sought to impose their dystopian vision on the world
autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Assumptions about vaccine-induced herd immunity are discussed, the latter often used as an excuse to promote vaccine mandates. While various areas of the book had already been addressed by other authors, Dispatches from the Vaccine Wars may be the first book to provide an inclusive treatment of all of the issues surrounding vaccination, theory and practice.
COVID-19 and the shadowy “Trusted News Initiative”
How TNI methodically censors top world public health experts using an early warning system by Elizabeth Woodworth What do the inventor of mRNA technology; the lead author of the most downloaded paper on Covid-19 in the American Journal of Medicine; a former editor of the American Journal of Epidemiology; renowned epidemiologists at Harvard, Stanford, and Oxford; and France’s leading microbiologist – have in common? They have all been censored by a repressive media network that most people have never heard of. This network has outrageously conceived and conveyed a “monopoly of legitimate information.”[i] Exposing this uncanny censorship of eminent voices is especially vital to the fate of children and youth, who are being aggressively targeted for low-benefit, sometimes lethal, inoculations.
August / September
ince early in the COVID-19 pandemic, which according to the World Health Organization kills only 0.23% of those infected[ii], enormous fear and panic have been fuelled by the hourly drumbeat of a “one-voice” media. An international process of editorial standardization has delivered unprecedented news coverage of the monopolized message: 1. The pandemic threatens the survival of all humanity 2. There is no therapy to cure the sick 3. It is necessary to confine the whole population, and 4. The delivery will come only from a vaccine.[iii] Many people have been dismayed by the singularity of this propaganda, and how it could possibly have been achieved. That is the subject of this study. Introduction: How the TNI Got Started On June 24, 2021, a report from the Oxford-based Reuters Institute revealed that trust in the US media – ranking last among 46 countries – had descended to an all-time low of 29%. Meanwhile, Canadian trust in media has sunk to 45%.[iv] This downward spiral can only mean that people are going elsewhere for their news – a trend that has likely been accelerated by the emergence of a shadowy global censorship network called the Trusted News Initiative (TNI). In July 2019, before the pandemic, the UK and Canadian governments hosted the FCO Global Conference on Media Freedom,[v] where then BBC Director-General Tony Hall announced: “Last month I convened, behind closed doors, a Trusted News Summit at the BBC, which brought together global tech platforms and publishers. The goal was to arrive at a practical set of actions we can take together, right now, to tackle the rise of misinformation and bias….I’m determined that we use that [BBC] unique reach and trusted voice to lead the way – to cre-
ate a global alliance for integrity in news. We’re ready to do even more to help promote freedom and democracy worldwide.”[vi] The initial Trusted News partners in attendance were the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), Facebook, Financial Times, First Draft, Google, The Hindu, and The Wall Street Journal. This was the embryonic start of a soon-to-become global media-wide Early Warning System that would rapidly alert members to “disinformation which threatens human life or disrupts democracy during elections.”[vii] Where did the idea come from? The BBC had earlier responded[viii] to a call for evidence from the House of Lords’ Select Committee on Democracy and Digital Technology, citing in its first footnote a June 3, 2019 BBC blog entitled “Tackling Misinformation.”[ix] The first point of that blog referred to a pre-pandemic March 3, 2019 BBC news report that anti-vaxxers were gaining traction on social media as part of a “fake news” movement spreading “misleading and dangerous information”.[x] The June 3 blog also claimed a “mammoth” online scale of deceitful business practices and hate speech as problems needing “algorithmic interventions”. The online “information ecosystem” was “polluted”; the size of the problem “unprecedented.” The BBC and other organizations would be looking at interventions “to address misinformation across the media landscape”. Looking back at this perception of pre-Covid problems, the motives of the TNI network appear to have been constructive and reasonable. However, there was no inkling at the time of how vast, repressive, and darkly persuasive these interventions were soon to become. The action started. CBC/Radio-Canada publicly announced its participation in the TNI in September 2019, saying “this includes a commitment to collaborate on source authentication, civic information, media education, and other responses to disinformation.”[xi] The Hindu announced the Indian program simultaneously.[xii] Two weeks after WHO announced the Covid-19 pandemic on March 11, 2020, Canada’s CBC reported that the Trusted News Initiative had announced plans “to tackle harmful coronavirus disinformation.” “Starting today, partners in the Trusted News Initiative will alert each other to disinformation about coronavirus, including ‘imposter content’ purporting to come from trusted sources. Such content will be reviewed promptly to ensure that disinformation is not republished.” [xiii] The media partners had now expanded to include Twitter, Microsoft, Associated Press, Agence France-
Presse, Reuters, and the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. The TNI next agreed to engage with a new verification technology called Project Origin, led by a coalition of the BBC, CBC/Radio-Canada, Microsoft and The New York Times – with a mandate toidentify non-authorized news stories for suppression. In July, 2020, Eric Horvitz, Chief Scientific Officer for Microsoft, remarked about authorizing the news: “We’ve forged a close relationship with the BBC and other partners on Project Origin, aimed at methods and standards for end-to-end authentication of news and information.”[xiv] By December 2020, the BBC had reported that disinformation was “spreading online to millions of people,” and included minimizing COVID-19 risks along with impugning the vaccine developers’ motives.[xv] In a June 25, 2021 summary article by investigative staff, TrialSiteNews asked the question, “COVID19 Censorship: Trusted News Initiative to Decide the Facts?” and began its reply with: “Since time immemorial, those with power have used it to control those without. In the modern world, big government and big tech represent the seats of power when it comes to who is allowed to say what. Of course, many think that “private companies” can regulate speech in any way they see fit. But from either an ethical or legal point of view, this is false. The argument from the societal benefits of free speech works equally for posting YouTube videos and handing out flyers on a corner. Legally, the [U.S.] Supreme Court has long held that when a private company creates something that functions as a public square (think of a company town), the First Amendment comes into play. Way back in April 2020, it was already clear that the then-existing online socio-political censorship was going to expand into the world of science, medicine, and academia in the new COVID-19 era.”[xvi] What is Disinformation? This question has been sloppily handled by the mainstream media, which often confuses “misinformation” (unintentionally misleading information) with what they mean, “disinformation,” which is deliberate. Several dictionary definitions agree on that point: American Heritage: “Deliberately misleading information announced publicly or leaked by a government or especially by an intelligence agency in order to influence public opinion or the government in another nation.”[xvii] Merriam-Webster: “False information deliberately continued p.9… and often covertly spread (as by
Early Warning System? To support individual acts of censorship, the social the planting of rumors) in order to influence public [xviii] media giants refer to the WHO, CDC, FDA, and NIH opinion or obscure the truth.” policies as their justification. Discussions such as the The OED (Oxford English Dictionary): “The dissource of the virus, early treatments, and vaccine adverse semination of deliberately false information, esp. effects – if they originate outside of these agencies – are when supplied by a government or its agent to a quickly suppressed by the coordinated TNI network. foreign power or to the media, with the intention We will look at seven of these suppressions, in order of influencing the policies or opinions of those who [xix] of their first occurrence: receive it.” Suppression #1: The Source of SARS-2 Given that these definitions specify deliberate govThe Trusted News Initiative very quickly got to work ernment action, it seems odd that the TNI has identified a silencing “disinformation” about a SARS-2 connection scattered online public as the source of intentional false to the inadequate Wuhan levels 2 and 3 biosafety labs. information and propaganda – especially concerning However, since former NYT writer Nicholas Wade’s elections and health policy. thorough investigation in May 2021,[xxxiii] and the FOIA What are the TNI’s Public Health Sources? Are They dump of Dr. Fauci’s emails[xxxiv] in June, the TNI partTrustworthy? ners, including Facebook and Twitter, have given up The TNI reports Covid-19 health policy from the censoring free speech about a Wuhan lab escape. world’s major public health agencies, including the Suppression #2: Denial of Early Treatments for World Health Organization (WHO), the US Centers for Covid Disease Control (CDC), the US Food and Drug AdminAs we have seen, the medical literature is full of peeristration (FDA), and the US National Institutes of Health reviewed published studies showing both the prophylac(NIH). tic and early treatment efficacy of a range of safe, inexThis policy is passed down through national and state pensive, readily available drugs and substances. governments, who convey it to the public via their media During the March-December 2020 period, these and websites, along with local case reports (based on the were claimed to be ineffective by government and the questionable PCR test) and deaths. media in order to pave the way for FDA Emergency Use Unfortunately, this top-down leadership has at best Authorizations for remdesivir (whose efficacy is now been illogical and inconsistent, and at worst corrupted under question[xxxv]) and the mRNA vaccines. by the vast profits of the vaccine industry. Scandalously, hundreds of thousands of people died Examples of either incompetent or corrupt public while waiting for the vaccines to arrive in December health leadership include NIAID director Dr. Anthony 2020. Why did they die? Because their doctors were Fauci’s extraordinary contradictions concerning the problocked from prescribing the re-purposed drugs HCQ tection offered by masks.[xx] and IVM that have long been on the WHO list of essenMore astonishing is the fact that on July 21, 2021, tial medicines. the CDC quietly recalled the use of the WHO-supported The TNI, by censoring the truth that the public so PCR test, which since February 2020 has been the global desperately needed, has been a primary enabler of this standard for measuring Covid-19 case numbers. This catastrophic, vaccine-friendly policy. recall was eventually reported about a During July 2021, instead of acknowlweek later, yet it had appeared on the edging the early treatment evidence they CDC website[xxi] the first day after the had housed[xxxvi] all along (thus being directnews that George Soros and Bill Gates ly complicit in these deaths), the governhad acquired the UK Covid test com[xxii] ment-media complex doubled down on its pany, Mologic. intense campaign to vaccinate every one of The PCR test had already had a us. checkered history: Its recommendation Incredibly, on August 3, 2021, 16 had been very suddenly approved by months and 612,386 deaths too late, AnthoWHO after being hurriedly rushed to ny Fauci, in an excerpt supplied by TNI publication in Eurosurveillance,[xxiii] one partner Reuters, “floats [a] pill to ‘knock day after its submission date of Januout’ COVID early”, given once daily for ary 22, 2020. Incredibly, it lacked peer seven to ten days.[xxxvii] review – an irregularity that was formalSuppression #3: The Voices of Dissenting ly challenged by 22 scientists seeking its Health Professionals retraction.[xxiv] While major health policy-makers such Worse yet, this global PCR test, as WHO, CDC, FDA, and Anthony Fauci which amplifies fragments of live or Powerpoint presentation given internally in FDA, July 29, 2020; posted to have careened from one unprecedented dead virus found in nose swabs, shows YouTube August 6, 2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkXQ09T6f94 (see society-killing edict to the next, many emimany false positives (which are official- 14:47 minutes) nent public health professionals at the tops ly deemed “cases,” regardless of sympof their fields have stepped forward to offer sane, tradithe final item of this in-house FDA slide.[xxxi] toms). A study conducted last year by the Infectious tional, contagion-control measures. Apart from early op-ed exposés by eminent Yale Diseases Society of America found that at 25 cycles of However, they have not been welcome in the media epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch,[xxxii] where was the amplification, “up to 70% of patients remain positive in or the social media. TNI Director Jessica Cecil explained investigative journalism? culture” tests. Fine, but at 30 cycles culture verification why, at the Trust In News Conference,’ continued p.10… Who and What Have Been Most Censored by TNI’s dropped to 20%, and by 35 cycles, less than 3% of cul…COVID -19, from pg. 8
tures remained positive.[xxv] Misleadingly, most European and US labs have been basing their frightening “case” numbers – published 24/7 through the TNI – on 35 cycles or higher.[xxvi] The most shocking – if not criminal – Covid leadership failure of all is that the WHO, NIH, CDC, and FDA have consistently denied the existence of the 85%-effective, cheap, safe and abundant early treatments for Covid-19. Their only recommended option until November 2020 – a month before the vaccines arrived – was to sicken at home until you couldn’t breathe; then go the hospital. (In November the FDA and the NIH allowed anti-SARS-2 monoclonal antibody products for mild outpatient disease in high-risk patients – but nothing else.[xxvii]) There was to be no government-sanctioned cure until a vaccine arrived. The obedient TNI – not into investigative journalism – followed suit. In spite of extensive evidence supporting early treatment efficacy,[xxviii] and although 56 countries have adopted early treatments,[xxix] there have been no TNI-approved media statements that any early treatments, including hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), ivermectin (IVM), quercetin, zinc, budesonide, or Vitamins C and D, are effective in treating Covid-19 outpatients during the first 5-7 days of flu-like symptoms. The denial has been so strong that in early 2020 many US state pharmacy boards –in unprecedented disrespect for the authority of physicians – banned pharmacies from filling HCQ prescriptions to treat outpatient Covid19.[xxx] In August 2020, it came to light that pre-licensure Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) for the mRNA vaccines could not be legally approved if there was an available alternative – that is, if the FDA had already issued an EUA for outpatient use of HCQ, as shown in
August / September 2021
August / September
…COVID -19, from pg. 9
in April, 2021: “First, those pushing disinformation…are using apparently trustworthy sources. Anti-vax content often uses interviews with people who have medical degrees for instance. And there is frequently a grain of truth to what is claimed. That makes untangling the true from the false harder…”[xxxviii] In “untangling the true from the false”, untrained media personnel have censored the following prominent professors and researchers with outstanding publication histories[xxxix] and conflict-of-interest-free credentials. Each is linked to his or her Google Scholar publication record: • Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, epidemiologist, Stanford University • Dr. Sunetra Gupta, infectious disease epidemiologist, Oxford Univ. • Dr. Martin Kulldorff, epidemiologist, Harvard • Dr. Robert W. Malone, inventor of mRNA technology platform • Dr. Peter A. McCullough, former Vice-Chair Int. Med., Baylor Univ. • Dr. Didier Raoult, microbiologist and director, IHU Méditerranée Infection; Professor at Aix Marseille Université • Dr. Harvey A. Risch, Prof. Epid., Yale School of Public Health • Dr. Knut M. Wittkowski, biometrician, 20-year head, biostatistics/epid., Rockefeller University • Dr. Michael Yeadon, former VP of respiratory research, Pfizer. The TNI has also vigorously censored frontline physicians who have saved thousands of lives with early Covid-19 treatments: Dr. Zev Zelenko in New York,[xl] Drs. George Fareed and Brian Tyson in California;[xli] America’s Frontline Doctors,[xlii] founded by Dr. Simone Gold; and the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FCCCA),[xliii] led by ICU/critical-care physician Dr. Pierre Kory. A member of FCCCA, Dr. Joseph Varon, who is chief of staff at United Memorial Medical Center in Houston, has had more than 1,600 media interviews, yet he told local Fox reporter Ivory Hecker that reporters will never discuss his highly successful MATH+ hospital treatment protocol – “because the news producers will not allow it.”[xliv] Why not? Because his hospital-based protocol using cheap, safe, plentiful drugs such as methylprednisolone, fluvoxamine, thiamine, heparin, and ivermectin, combined with zinc, ascorbic acid, and vitamin D,[xlv] has yielded about half the inpatient death rate reported by the CDC.[xlvi] And that is not allowed by those who direct the media – those whose inferable mission is a vaccine policy based on millions of questionable PCR tests, followed by a vaccine passport that by all appearances is the endgame. Suppression #4: The Record Number of Serious PostVaccine Side Effects and Deaths Record post-vaccine side effects and deaths have been reported online by the US CDC VAERs (Vaccine
Adverse Effects Reporting system), by the UK Yellow Card System, by the EU Vaccine Injury Reporting System, and by Israel. In the United States, VAERS reported 491,218 adverse effects and 11,405 deaths from February 10 until July 24, 2021.[xlvii] However, connecting these deaths directly to the vaccines is not straightforward. In England, Dr. Tess Lawrie of the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy (EbMC), stated in June 2021 that there were “at least 3 urgent questions that need to be answered by the English equivalent to CDC, the MHRA: “How many people have died within 28 days of vaccination? How many people have been hospitalised within 28 days of vaccination? How many people have been disabled by the vaccination?”[xlviii] Also in June, Dr. Lawrie wrote a highly-referenced 11-page letter to the MHRA Chief Executive showing that “the MHRA now has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card System to declare the COVID-19 vaccine unsafe for use in humans.”[xlix] Suppression #5: Natural Immunity Stronger than Vaccinated Immunity Very simply put, the mRNA vaccines only generate antibodies against the single synthetic spike protein that they instruct the body first to make, and then to provide immunity against. But if the original wild SARS-2 spike mutates, the altered virus is less easily recognized by the immune system and often escapes its antibodies. Meanwhile, natural immunity, which has fought off the whole virus and remembers it through both antibody and T-cell immunity, is much more robust and effective – in spite of minor spike mutations.[l] Given this fact, the world’s governments and media should have allowed proof of immunity through tests such as T-Detect, which is authorized “for detecting and identifying the presence of an adaptive T-cell immune response to SARS-CoV-2”[li] – in lieu of being vaccinated, for those who preferred them. Instead, the confusing, superficially informed TNI has pushed only the highly profitable but increasingly failed experimental vaccines, which now, although they reduce risk in high-risk people, have “almost no value as a way of protecting others, so there is no benefit in vaccinating children, introducing vaccine passports domestically or internationally, or coercing young people to get a vaccine which to them is almost all risk and no benefit.”[lii] Suppression #6: Worrying Evidence of Pathogenic Priming/ADE During early mRNA clinical trials, cats, ferrets, monkeys, and rabbits have experienced Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), also known as pathogenic priming or a cytokine storm. This occurs when the immune system creates an overwhelming, uncontrolled inflammatory response upon being confronted with the virus in the real world, and then dies. The director of the Pathological Institute of the University of Heidelberg, Peter Schirmacher, has carried out over 40 autopsies on people who had died within two weeks of vaccination. Schirmacher was alarmed to cite on August 3, 2021, “rare, severe side effects of the vac-
cination – such as cerebral vein thrombosis or autoimmune diseases”.[liii] On August 5, 2021, Israeli Dr. Kobi Haviv, at the Herzog Hospital in Jerusalem, reported that “95% of the severe patients are vaccinated…85-90% of the hospitalizations are in fully vaccinated people…We are opening more and more COVID wards…The effectiveness of the vaccine is waning/fading out.”[liv] Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA technology, has explained that the susceptibility to ADE is greatest precisely during the long phase in which the vaccine tapers off: “The vaccine in its waning phase is causing the virus to replicate more efficiently than it would otherwise, which is called Antibody Dependent Enhancement,” adding that all previous coronavirus vaccine development programs led to ADE.[lv] It is essential that informed consent for Covid-19 vaccines include notification of the possibility of ADE, especially with regard to parents, whose children should be protected at all costs: “The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.”[lvi] How many people receiving mRNA vaccines have been told this? Certainly their Trusted News Initiative has not told them. Suppression #7: The Central Role of Co-Morbidities in Serious Covid Disease Only 4% of Covid deaths in England died without pre-existing conditions.[lvii] In the US, 94.9% had preexisting conditions.[lviii] How often has the pharma-backed media hinted that 78% of US Covid hospitalizations are overweight or obese? Or suggested that “hey folks, you might save your life by dieting”?[lix] How often have we been warned that 59% of hospital admissions are deficient in Vitamin D?[lx][lxi] Has the government-media complex ever mandated Vitamin D intake standards to take pressure off Intensive Care Units? Has Tony Fauci ever told people to take enough Vitamin D when – according to his FOIA’d emails – he takes 6,000 IUs a day himself?[lxii] Or would it have created insufficient fear to drive people to unguaranteed experimental vaccines for the TNI to let us know? Conclusion: The Media and Democracy A primary motive behind the formation of the TNI may have been to eradicate the so-called “disinformation” that an insulted, indignant public prefers to the creatively irrelevant corporate-led media, aka “the presstitute”. It’s not as if the media has a track record of being right about pandemics. For example, it trusted worstcase scenario modeler Neil Ferguson and the pharmacontrolled World Health Organization over the 2009 swine flu “pandemic”– which fizzled out leaving governments to incinerate millions of dollars in vaccines.[lxiii] Such industry achievements use continued p.16…
Where covid came from and who funded its creation: follow the patents and the money by David E. Martin, PhD David E. Martin noticed unusual activity in patent registration in the US, Europe and Canada among other countries. Here he describes UBC’s and the Government of Canada’s hidden role in the current global scheme.
ɶɶ We did not have SARS as a human condition until we had invented a weaponized version of corona virus.
In 2002 the weaponization of corona virus was complete. That’s when the spike protein, the ACE receptor dynamics, the open reading frames around various subfractions of the protein synthesis that’s available using the model created by the corona virus model. All of that was fully weaponized by 2002. I make that point clearly because we did not have SARS as a human condition until we had invented a weaponized version of corona virus. A decade earlier, Pfizer had filed the first patent on a corona virus vaccine that was a veterinary application and that was filed in 1990. So Pfizer’s first effort to get a spike protein based vaccine for corona virus started in 1990, not in 2020. This has been, to restate the obvious, a pathogen bioweapons program that is now over two decades in the making. And it is vital for us to understand that what is currently being called the medical countermeasure, referred to as a vaccine, does not meet statutory definition of that particular technology because, unlike every other vaccine in the history of humanity, every other vaccine is derived from some either fragment of or attenuated version of, a pathogen. This particular injection that we’re dealing with right now, this particular injection is an mRNA model computer generated; not derived from a living or an organic material. This is a computer simulation of an mRNA strand which was thought to be a means by which we could turn the human body into a pathogen creator. By that I mean the formation of the corona virus associated spike protein. And for the first time in vaccine history and once again I’m using that term because it’s what we’re calling it. It is not in fact a vaccine. It’s a gene therapy to create a bio-weapon. For the first time in vaccine history, we are
relying on the immune system to respond to a pathogen creation that we first inject into people. So the fact of the matter is we have an unprecedented outcome. And if we go back and look at the patent record. If we go back and look at the laboratory record. And if we go back and look at the funding record, we see that the current pathogen called SARS-COV-2 was clearly chimerically altered and was clearly primarily developed in the laboratory so that it could be used both as a weapon and as a medical countermeasure in 2015. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill - and we’ve reported on this, quite significantly funded by NIAID developed and violated the International Convention on Biological and Chemical Weapons by taking a foreign uploaded model of SARS-COV-2 and turning it into a recombinant chimeric pathogen which they said, and I quote, “was poised for human emergence”. And “poised for human emergence” not in 2019, as we’ve been told by the propaganda, but that publication was published in February of 2016; published from work that was done from 2013 to 2015. There is no novel corona virus. There is a weaponized version of a computer simulation of a fragment that is in fact modeled to be the spike protein, analogous to what we’ve been told is the spike protein associated with SARS-COV-2 The problem is we do not have anything that is actually derived from an actual pathogen. And we do not have anything that’s actually responsive to the immune system that was in fact responsive to a pathogen. This is a computer simulation meant to harm and destroy what we call humanity. According to Pfizer, we have what they refer to in their own documents as ‘an acceptable death rate’. I don’t know how many of you can sit with that statement, but the notion that there is something called ‘an acceptable death rate’ is something I find morally repugnant. What I find more interesting than that is Canada’s role in this, which has achieved almost no fundamental coverage in any media or even in the counter culture media and most Canadians don’t realize that Canada itself, and not just Canada, but specifically the University of British Columbia (UBC) beginning in 2005 realized that if it was going to be relevant in the biotech space, it had to be the country and it had to be the research hotbed for establishing the delivery mechanism, whereby mRNA vaccines could be developed. UBC, working in partnership with INEX Pharmaceuticals in 2005, developed the lipid nanoparticle technology that ultimately became the basis of the formation of a company in British Columbia called Tekmira Pharmaceuticals. In 2009, Tekmira had a very interesting set of challenges and this was commensurate with the 2008 declaration by the World Health continued p.12…
August / September
uring the decade of the 90s, I was the founding chairman of Mosaic Technologies and Idea Med. Mosaic Technologies was a treaty restricted technology transfer company here in the United States. What we did was we worked with finding civilian applications for technologies developed in military applications around the world; most prominently countries that were prohibited from exporting offensive military technologies as conditions of the treaties that ended the second World War. Every citizen has the asset of their creativity, innovation, intellectual property, copyrights, trademarks, et cetera. We built the organization that allowed that to be regulated and used as bankable collateral so that small business could have a leg to stand on. And we built that company in 1998. And as a result of the formation of M-CAM, we fell through an unfortunate, but now fortuitous, rabbit-hole. So from breast cancer to stealth materials to anechoic, to antenna to every device that you probably have in your hand or in your laptop, we had a very important role to play during the decade of the 90s in bringing technologies out of bio-weapons and weapons laboratories and getting them into civilian and commercial use. In 1998, the formation of M-CAM led to the first audit of patent systems in Canada, the USA, Australia, the European Union, and elsewhere. They found an enormous number of crimes were committed using the patent system to stand in the way of progress not to advance innovations for which they were established. Specifically in 1999, they uncovered what became the roots of our awareness of the current pandemic; they uncovered the biologic materials in violation of the biological and chemical weapons treaties that were proliferating around the country and around the world. And in 1999 going into 2000, we first reported on the weaponization of biologic materials in violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties. And among those weaponizations was, in our first published report for a number of intelligence and law enforcement community, our identification of the chimeric alteration and recombinant technologies around corona virus, which in 1999 were first developed to serve as a means by which we could build a vaccine vector; at the time thought to be useful for the treatment or prevention of HIV. The problem with that work was it, very specifically beginning in 1999 with NIAID’S funding directed by Anthony Fauci, was very clear that what they had done
in their gain-of-function research in 1999 was take what was a normally occurring pathogen and turn it into what was then referred to as ‘an infectious, non-transmissible pathogen’. In other words they actually made it more dangerous to the human and they made it more dangerous so that it could be used as a potential for vaccine vectors going forward. And that was in 1999.
August / September
…Where Covid came from, from pg. 11
Organization that the corona virus was in fact eradicated as a condition associated with SARS. And because of the lack of funding in 2008, both Canada and the United States struggled with the fact that they had developed a technology that was supposed to be for a vaccination of corona virus and for a number of other viral models. But the problem was they ran out of funding and so there was a series of reorganizations. And in those reorganizations two companies were formed: Arbutus Biopharma and Acuitas Therapeutics. https://investor.arbutusbio.com/press-releases https://acuitastx.com/news-events/ Acuitas is the company that unfortunately the Government of Canada has not told the citizens of Canada is the reason why both Moderna and Pfizer have the ability to deliver the current bioweapons program. I think most people would be shocked to find out that when you have the Prime Minister of Canada getting up in front of a camera in the Spring of 2020, telling the world that the only way forward to allegedly return to a new normal is when there is a vaccine. What Trudeau did not tell the public was that he had a financial stake in the outcome of that being the selected pathway forward. What he didn’t tell the Canadian public was that Canada’s blight on the moral record of what has been historically an amazingly wonderful set of innovations coming out of the Canadian research institutions and research laboratories in fact, created the mechanism whereby you could take mRNA and inject it into a population and try to stabilize that injection. The lipid nanoparticle technology that was developed and ultimately passed to Arbutus Biopharma was the subject of a licensing agreement that was made with Acuitas Therapeutics in British Columbia, a private company who conveniently had very little reporting requirements. Acuitas misappropriated the lipid nanoparticle technology and ultimately made it available to both BioNTech and Moderna. It is absolutely critical for us to understand that without the Canadian contribution of the lipid nanoparticle technology from British Columbia, we would have no meaningful response in the form of what’s being called a vaccination. And we would not have a bioweapons program. That’s a pretty important statement to make to an audience, largely of Canadians, and it would be very interesting to find out why it is that Trudeau has not admitted to the public and has been unwilling to actually put into the
ɶɶ $8 and $9 billion, came in the form of the revenue off of all of the interventions that are being sold off as 12 corona virus vaccines.
public record what we know to be at least billions of dollars of concessions. And it could be. I mean, if we looked at just Pfizer/ BioNTech’s own situation we know that in the case of Pfizer/BioNTech that last quarter alone somewhere between $8 and $9 billion, came in the form of the revenue off of all of the interventions that are being sold off as corona virus vaccines. In the last quarter alone this would place this tiny little British Columbia company, which in 2009 was functionally owned by one person, Thomas Madden, who’s the CEO of Acuitas. In 2009, he was largely the sole owner of it. He actually appropriated the technology in a labor dispute, which functionally was a trade secret argument around this. When we actually look at what happened in 2016, this is a very important point people, in 2016 somebody in Canada knew that there was something going to happen with this particular vaccine platform because in 2016 Arbutus Biopharma and Acuitas Pharmaceuticals got into litigation on whether or not the license for the lipid nanoparticle technology that Acuitas had from Arbutus was in fact capable of being extended to other pathogens. In 2016 there was a significant amount of litigation and the license that Acuitas had to use lipid nanoparticle technology, developed by Tekmira, developed by Arbutus. The license was actually terminated in 2016. That coincides with the weaponization of SARS-COV-2. Now, do we have at this moment in time the written record of the evidence of what we know was knowable? The answer to that is, no. There is no public information that currently exists that has been made in any format that any of us can access. There’s no public information to tell us what precisely transpired in 2016 which allowed this particular dispute to erupt between these two Canadian firms, all based in the history of Tekmira. But somewhere in 2016, somebody knew that there was a lottery win to be had. And my guess is that somewhere inside of the Canadian health system and somewhere inside NIAID, in the Vaccine Research Center and somewhere inside the UNC Chapel Hill records, we will find that the Trudeau government was fully aware, by at least 2018, that we were going to have a significant pandemic requiring this core technology to be unleashed on the world courtesy of the Canadian collaboration on lipid nanoparticles. There is no question that by the time we get to 2019, March specifically of 2019, we know that Arbutus, Moderna, Pfizer/BioNTech and others were in fact working on a vaccine for respiratory pathogens. We know that information because they amended their patent filings to say exactly that. Well, I think it’s very clear that Trudeau has for a significant period of time become extremely compromised in the fact that he pretends on the one hand to be a victim of a public health crisis, and on the other hand, not unlike Andrew Cuomo, the Governor of New York, the spokesperson for the alleged level-headed response of draconian, lockdown and countermeasure approaches which create the market demand that says that we’re going to remove civil liberties, we’re going to remove the right for people to actually engage in any civil discourse but in fact what we’re going to do is pretend like we are
somehow the victims of a natural set of events that have unfolded. The fact of the matter is, he knows very good and well because he was party to, and the government certainly was party to agreements with Pfizer, with Moderna and with others where there was no question that Canadian firms knew good and well that the lipid nanoparticle technology was actually a front line contender for a respiratory pathogen simulation. (Editor’s note: The Liberals refuse to release their purchasing agreements with Pfizer and Moderna) And by no later than September of 2019 the Canadian government was fully aware and participating in what was supposed to be a global exercise to test the readiness of the world to deal with a respiratory pathogen pandemic that was planned and published in September of 2019. The Canadian government was very much a party of that, so there’s no chance that this was not fully known, fully anticipated, fully pre-meditated. And there is no question that the script that Trudeau read from was a script that was in fact marketing what would become a federal restraint of trade violation in Canada, which was a very important restraint of trade by making the allegation before we even knew what the actual pathogen was technically. What we know, is that Trudeau’s statements biased
ɶɶ Trudeau’s statements biased the marketplace against the consumer the marketplace against the consumer so that there was in fact, declared by the government a single pathway, a single market opportunity out of this particular pandemic. By telling the world that the only way forward was a vaccine, what that did was it actually precluded the use of life-saving countermeasures that were (FDA approved) medicines that could have helped and could have supported the health of people. And instead of that, we watched people die while we were waiting for an economic windfall. And that economic windfall is going to a private corporation whose accountability is not to a shareholder, is not to anything that has public visibility. It has the private benefit of being a private British Columbia company that can be used as a front for all manner of things, and it is in fact without question participating in one of the greatest crimes in terms of racketeering and collusion that this world has ever seen. It’s important for us to focus in on this because racketeering and antitrust laws have been violated, and both the US and Canada have very robust antitrust laws. The fact of the matter is, there are three fundamental elements of antitrust, and all three are violated. The first is that you cannot do what’s called market allocation. In other words, you cannot use either a public or a private institution where colluding parties get together and say we are going to tell the consumer what their only option is. That’s a market allocation violation,
ɶɶ Because racketeering and antitrust laws have been violated. a racketeering thing. You also cannot suppress information and coerce people into accepting a single scenario when the market forces are not at play. In other words, you cannot suspend from market consideration, other alternatives so that you pick the only winner in which by the way, you’ve already placed bets on the table in the form of funding and you also have an economic gain. And you can guarantee yourself that the Canadian Government knows very good and well that it had huge economic gain to gain from the use of the lipid nanoparticle technology. And it had everything to lose if the lipid nanoparticle technology didn’t win. So we know that the collusion was there. We know that the racketeering was there. We also know that there was insider information; non-transparent transactions from what’s called interlocking directorates where individuals who have the ability to set prices to allocate research dollars and to ultimately set acquisition policy to take that technology on board is in fact by very definition, the racketeering that is anti-competitive, antitrust. Now, why is this important? It’s important because these are all felony violations. And what makes a felony violation far more important than a civil crime is that a felony violation, actually pierces the veil of corporate liability. And this is a very important point. People need to understand the reason why I’m so obsessed with going after felonies and not going after
ɶɶ No corporation gets civil liability immunity if they are complicit in a felony crime.
ɶɶ Canadians need to understand that we’ve been duped.
ɶɶ Government of Canada is complicit in violating biological and chemical weapons laws. And that falls to the Prime Minister. serious about it. I am unwilling to be silent because I know that I actually have information. And I have compiled information. And the bad news for people like Trudeau is, if you think that this is the only piece of information I have on things that he’s been involved in. It’s a tip of the iceberg. The fact of the matter is I’m very comfortable making public allegations against public seated people in authority because I happen to know that this is not one situation. This is not isolated. This is the beginning of a contest and I would be more than delighted to find out how deep they want to go head-to-head with me on what I know about their actions. But the fact of the matter is, these things were all happening while we were asleep. We need to be very clear on the fact that we were asleep at the switch and it is on us to realize that if this happened while we weren’t paying continued p.14…
and whether businesses should stay open or not. We have been duped into having a conversation that is the wrong conversation. There is a crime that is being committed. Our public officials are complicit in that crime, and there is no question that as a civilization, we owe it to ourselves and future generations to make sure that we are not silent while those who are in positions of elected authority are committing willful acts of crimes against humanity. In the United States we have the unfortunate reality of not having the benefits of some of what you guys have in Crown law. But the fact of the matter is, in Canada as well as the rest of the Commonwealth, you actually have a mechanism where you can allege and actually initiate criminal proceedings without relying on the Department of Justice (DOJ) we have in the US. We know that our DOJ here in the United States is corrupt. We know that they have been willfully incapable of prosecuting any of the known crimes, which, by the way, include here in the United States, one of the best known crimes that apparently we can now get away with: lying to Congress. Anthony Fauci has now, on two documented occasions, actually lied to Congress, which is a violation of section 1001 of the criminal code. But lying to Congress is something that Fauci started doing in the fall of 2020, when he willfully failed to disclose the financial interests National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) had in a number of the technologies that were being promoted in this particular pandemic. Failed to disclose the NIAID’s and National Institute of Health’s (NIH) financial interest in a request that was made by Congress. In a report submitted to Congress Anthony Fauci lied about his financial position, which is in fact a felony. And then obviously, as you all know, recently, he actually lied about funding gain-of-function research, despite the fact that, as we entered into the public record, there are over 50 letters sent out from NIAID and NIH to his gain-offunction funded studies when the gain-of-function moratorium was put in place, that in fact stated specifically NIAID grants that Anthony Fauci had approved that were in fact gain-of-function research. And ironically, if you look at the influenza research, it is in fact NIAID’s own model of gain-of-function which
is published as Why Gain-of-Function Research Should Be Supported. We know that there are countless crimes, which are felony violations on both sides of the border. And we know that it will not be until the public forces this into action that any action will be taken. We need to focus on where the issue is; the reason why we’re not talking about Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) tests is it’s not a crime to use the wrong technology to measure a thing that doesn’t exist. It’s not a crime, it’s stupid is what it is. It’s not a crime. I’m talking about things that in fact have jailable and financial and felony statutes that make sure that we are capable of holding people accountable and actually sending people to prison where they belong. There is no question that your Prime Minister has violated not only the laws of Canada, but has participated in a bioweapons treaty violation. And let me be very precise on why I say that, because when I make an allegation, it has to stick. And the allegation comes from the definition of a bio-weapons program. Inside the definition of biological and chemical weapons, the manufacturer or the ability to provide the means by which you manufacture a biological weapon, defined under the statute as a fragment or a modeled fragment of a pathogen known to cause human harm. The fact that it is Canadian company technology that is required to deliver this particular weapon means that the Government of Canada is complicit in violating biological and chemical weapons laws. And that falls to the Prime Minister. So when I make the allegation, I’m dead
August / September
civil cases is because the felony violation of antitrust laws, which is prima facie established in this pandemic, would in fact mean that the manufacturers would not have the protections provided in the United States under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, under the Prep Act and in Canada under those acts equivalents. In other words, no corporation gets civil liability immunity if they are complicit in a felony crime. And once we establish that that is in fact the case, which by the way, does not require legal expertise, this is a prima facie case, meaning the facts present themselves there is no question that this was an act of racketeering and collusion. There is no question that this is an act of willful manipulation of market forces and violation of statutes, on both sides of the border. And the fact of the matter is, the minute this becomes
felony violation all of the liability flows back. Civil and criminal liability flows back to the manufacturers. And I can guarantee you that the day Pfizer and Moderna have to be on the hook for the lives they’re harming and the lives that they’re taking, there is no question that the entire terror campaign would shut down the next day. This is a moment where Canadians need to understand that we’ve been duped as a community. And by the way, that’s not unique to Canada. The civil society of the world has been duped to believe that we should be arguing about face masks and social distancing
…Where Covid came from, from pg. 13
attention. We better start informing ourselves more completely so that we do not allow corporate takeovers of our public space like has been allowed to take place in the last 20 months. In 2014 the veterinarian, Peter Daszak, who ran EcoHealth Alliance, the company that has been criticized for its role in laundering NIAID funds to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. But it’s important for you to realize
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act there was a means by which pharmaceutical companies were very interested in sheltering themselves from liability because they knew they were entering a phase where the increased danger of their actions was going to ultimately mean that business was not viable. If you know you’re going to harm a population, you need to make sure that you do the groundwork to make sure, from a litigation standpoint, you move yourself as far away from prosecution as possible. We know that
to be unleashed so that the public accepts something. So they went down the pathway of a universal influenza and a universal corona virus vaccine. Tragically, there is in fact no evidence that either of the pathogens was isolated. There was no evidence that we had a basis to create this mass campaign of terror. And even in what was reportedly a pandemic, we actually didn’t have people getting sick from a pathogen. One of the reasons why the World Health Organi-
beginning in 1986 there was a commitment on the part of the people who bought Congress, bought elected officials in the US, in Canada, around Europe. And in 1986 there was a willful act to take what was supposedly a loss-leading public health product like vaccines and turn it into a money-maker. And it turns out it’s a great idea to do that, because if what you’re going to do is ultimately, try to sell people on a whole host of other pharmaceuticals it is exceptionally good to build the autoimmune disease pattern which builds habituation to classic pharmaceutical intervention. That began in 1986 and as we moved into the 1990s it became very clear that the HIV campaign, which was supposed to be the giant payday where we had the ability to somehow finally get everybody to be afraid of a pathogen didn’t pay off very well because it was classified as a lifestyle oriented disease. And then what we had in the mid 1990s was the birth of the obsession about what was called a universal influenza vaccine. The desire on the part of industry was to make sure that every person would get addicted to taking the influenza shot every year. It’s a great money-maker. It’s a wonderful way for the industry to keep jabbing people on an annual basis, and the problem with that is, as we all know, the influenza vaccine was far less effective than people hoped it would be. And the public, not surprisingly, wasn’t willing to fall for it. Which led to a series of meetings, which took place
zation made it abundantly clear that COVID could be declared with no laboratory evidence is because if in fact there was a requirement for laboratory evidence, we would have actually had to test for a virus. But you didn’t have to have COVID-19; you had to have a series of clinical symptoms. Ironically what we have now is a situation where we are in fact injecting people, and this is where we need to get very clear on this, and remember people, if you don’t hear anything else, remember the word ‘vaccine’ is misleading. What is happening is the mRNA computer simulation of an S1 spike protein, thought to be modeled off of the possible SARS-COV-2. And so you got all of those preconditions. This is not a virus. This is not to disrupt a virus. This is actually an injection to make your body produce a foreign pathogen. The theory being that once that pathogen is being produced inside of your body, and by a pathogen, I’m talking about the S1 spike protein. The minute that is produced we are hopeful, that’s what the official science is, we’re hopeful that the body then triggers an immune response which will build, not an antibody to SARS-COV-2. The thought is that we’ll actually build an antibody to the spike protein model that we’re injecting.
August / September
ɶɶ “We need the public to accept a medical countermeasure for a pan-corona virus vaccine.” ...“We need the media to create the hype and we need to use the hype to our advantage. Investors will follow if they see profit at the end of a process.” – Peter Daszak, 2014
that in 2014, Peter Daszak specifically said at a public meeting: “We need the public to accept a medical countermeasure for a pan-corona virus vaccine.”...“We need the media to create the hype and we need to use the hype to our advantage. Investors will follow if they see profit at the end of a process.” Those are the published words of the guy who was the Wuhan Institute of Virology SARS-COV-2 architect. That statement made in 2014, is critical for us to think about because when you have a statement made that says that the public needs to accept a pan-influenza or pancorona virus vaccine. And you say that after the World Health Organization has declared the corona virus based SARS to be something that has in fact been obliterated from human history. This is a disease that has finally been overcome, like we overcame polio, and overcame smallpox. This is allegedly, according to the World Health Organization, an eradicated disease. But an eradicated disease is supposed to have a pan-corona virus vaccine which is requiring media hype so that investors will put money in because they’ll see profit at the end of the process. Those are their own words; that’s not Dave Martin’s opinion. And if we in fact have the perpetrators of this crime telling us that they are going to do the crime, why are we left sitting agape in 2020 or 2021, going “Oh man, that just sounds like a conspiracy”. Well, it sounds like a conspiracy because it is a crimi-
ɶɶ It sounds like a conspiracy because it is a criminal conspiracy ...a racketeering conspiracy meant to harm and destroy human life. nal conspiracy. It is a racketeering conspiracy meant to harm and destroy human life. Once again let’s go back and visit the statements made by Peter Daszak. As you all know, we had a period of time where the idea of a vaccine became quite popular among a certain ilk within the established public health community. We know that beginning with the 1986 National
at the NIAID Advisory Council, together with international partners to come up with a way to build a mechanism whereby we could convince the world that we needed to have a universal vaccine program for the world. The World Health Organization and NIAID, the Vaccine Research Center and their international collaborators got together and said basically, what we need is we need to have an event which allows a mass campaign of terror
ɶɶ They told us it was a vaccine because they wanted the shield of immunity of liability. “They told us it was a vaccine because they wanted the shield of immunity of liability.” Here’s the problem, people. Every single public statement that says that this is a COVID vaccine is a lie. This is not a vaccine for Covid. This is actually a medical countermeasure using gene therapy to try to manipulate your body into being a factory of a pathological substance; the spike protein associated with corona virus.
ɶɶ This is not about masks. This is not about social distancing. Those were decoys to distract us from the crimes being committed.
Full video available at: www.librti.com/page/view-video?id=752
Humanity is at a critical juncture because collectively we have failed to grasp the significance of the events unfolding around us and to respond accordingly. There is little argument that governments globally have exceeded their delegated authority. To permit this unfettered abuse of power is to risk losing the natural rights and freedoms that are the heritage of all people and the foundation of free and just societies. History reveals that rights and freedoms are never returned willingly. Rather, it is the oppressed themselves who ultimately reclaim and preserve human rights that benefit humanity. We have a responsibility to protect and preserve our rights and freedoms, not only for ourselves, but for all future generations. It is time for Canadians to rise up, speak up and stand firm against tyrannical orders to ensure that future generations may thrive in freedom, health and happiness. 1. AFFIRM YOUR RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS Read, sign and share the Victoria Declaration.
www.victoriadeclaration.com 2. SUPPORT THE FREEDOM MOVEMENT
Visit the Freedom Rising website. Learn about the organizations and individuals standing up for freedom. Support their efforts.
3. KNOW YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
Review the information on the Constitutional Rights Centre website and subscribe to their newsletter -
4. PROTECT YOUR RIGHT TO MEDICAL CHOICE
Vaccine Choice Canada is Canada’s oldest and most respected vaccine risk awareness organization, serving Canadians since 1982. VCC is leading the effort to protect your right to medical choice. Become a member of Vaccine Choice Canada today.
www.vaccinechoicecanada.com 5. FREEDOM IN ACTION
For a listing of current Freedom in Action initiatives visit: www.freedominaction.ca
the second thing to do is to stop having debates that aren’t real debates. This is not about masks. This is not about social distancing. Those were decoys to distract us from the crimes that were being committed. The crimes that are being committed are racketeering, bio-weapons, and in fact at least, reckless homicide, if not willful murder of massive numbers of our population. And we cannot sit idly by and allow that to persist. I am certain that within this audience someone has a prosecutor, has a barrister, has a QC, has a golf partner, has somebody who has the capacity to in fact move forward. There is no question that we have - using six degrees of separation - the people within our network who are the people who can take the appropriate action. Somewhere there is an elected official. Somewhere there is a prosecutor. Somewhere there is a QC. Somewhere there is someone who is within the reach of someone who is actually in this conversation. And the fact of the matter is, there is no question that it is not going to be the ballot box alone that decides this. This is going to be the human factors of people who in fact take their initiative to make sure their network is activated to the issues. And we in fact make a very clear statement that says we the people are watchfully aware of what is going on and we are not going to allow this to go on in our name. And we will be stronger because there are many people who now have the ability to know that they were here in this moment, at this time, informing themselves about what is transpiring. And we have the ability, as we’ve said before, to actually do what it takes to stand together. Because the only power that the incumbents have is to make sure we’re isolated. And we just blew that cover a little wider open right now. In my case, I started watching this thing in 1999. I started doing the things that I was doing in 2002. I started briefing the world’s law enforcement in 2003 about this before there ever was a SARS. And the fact of the matter is, the reason why I can stand so comfortably in knowing that what I’m saying is true. I have actually been watching this thing unfold longer than any person in elected office right now. The fact is, I know what I’m talking about. And I know that they don’t. And one needs to be very clear on the fact that it is not courageous to stand with the truth; it actually is human to stand with the truth. We will, as we the people, we will prevail.
CALL TO ACTION
August / September
And hopefully, that triggering an immune response. We have to get clear on this: They told us it was a vaccine because they wanted the shield of immunity of liability. As recently as the first quarter of 2020, in their own Securities and Exchange Commission filings, Moderna still made reference to the fact that the FDA considered their mRNA technology to be ‘gene therapy’. We do not have an injection that is in fact associated with the actual pathogen model that is called SARSCOV-2. As a result we must call it what it is: a foreign supplied computer model delivered to the world from China at some point in the early hours of 2020, sometime between January 7 and January 20. (Editor’s note: Corona Virus SARS-COV-2 was rebranded as a new disease Covid19 for marketing novel vaccines.) It is a computer model of a simulated pathogen, which was simulated from sampled populations of as many as 40 people prior to December 30. That model was uploaded to servers around the world and was then used to identify a computer model of what might be the mRNA strand that would code the spike protein. And that is what is being injected. We have to get clear on the fact that this is not a classic vaccine; the way we are trained to think of vaccines. This is a gene therapy to create a protein within the body which is to create an immune response. And we’re hoping that by injecting that pathogen using Canadian technology as the vector, which is the lipid nanoparticle technology that came out of UBC. We must understand that we have been told a narrative so that we actually shield companies from liability and the narrative is false. And our elected officials have willfully coerced the population using acts of domestic terror to make that message heard. As a Commonwealth country, you need to re-examine your statutory basis of action and make sure that your Members of Parliament are inundated with the information that we’re sharing right now. Your Member of Parliament must be informed that there is an active racketeering and criminal conspiracy that is actively harming the public. It is using the resources, the wealth and the innovation of Canada to violate international and domestic bioweapons and bio-terrorism statutes. So the first thing is to make sure that people hear this message. The second thing is to hold them accountable. You have an election coming up very soon. And what you must do is you must look to those individuals who are standing for public office and quite specifically have them make a public statement. Are you going to allow this to continue, or are you going to do something to disrupt this? And any official who’s standing for office, who is unwilling to actively commit to a public inquiry, an inquest, and ultimately a Royal Commission equivalent must be voted out. And you would vote for those individuals who are capable of making that comment. By merely having the conversation, it is important that you, as citizens understand your role in making sure that there is, in fact a public commitment. Getting people on record is the first thing to do. But
August / September
…COVID -19, from pg. 10
“influencers” – falsely independent “experts”, including specialist journalists, think tank facilitators, and academics whose research is funded by industry or government. Regarding Covid-19, Dr. Piers Robinson, co-director of the Organisation for Propaganda Studies, has judged, “It wouldn’t be an underestimation to say that this is probably one of the biggest propaganda operations that we have seen in history,” concluding “what happens is down to how people resist and how much force and coercion the authorities use.”[lxiv] Indeed, the very foundation of democracy is that public wisdom should be consulted and given its head in selfrule. The public has the constitutional right to full information to form and express its own conclusions and does not need a coordinated TNI to corral and contain it. It is utterly outrageous that the voices the public needs from the top public health figures at its best universities are being denied to its hearing. A far superior job of investigative reporting is being done by the hardworking alternative media researchers without Big Pharma’s blood-stained advertising dollars. Perhaps the TrialSiteNews staff has said it best: “We think that disallowing good-faith medical information because the public can’t be presumed to properly weigh claims is infantilizing said public, along with dismantling the free speech culture that perhaps peaked in the 20th Century. The efforts now underway to completely suppress positive data associated with early-onset treatment prospects such as ivermectin or the squelching of any discussion of vaccine safety issues is completely unacceptable in a civilized, democratic market-based society. Those perpetuating such offenses are in fact on the wrong side of history.”[lxv] Elizabeth Woodworth is co-author of recent books, Unprecedented Climate Mobilization, and UNPRECEDENTED CRIME Climate Science Denial and Game Changers for Survival. She co-produced the COP21 video A Climate Revolution For All. She wrote the popular handbook on nuclear weapons activism, What Can I Do?, which was discussed in Canadian Parliament. For 25 years, she served as head medical librarian for the BC Ministry of Health. She holds a BA from Queen’s and a
Library Sciences Degree from UBC.
Recommended websites for Covid-19 breaking info: https://www.rwmalonemd.com/news/ https://ourworldindata.org/ https://trialsitenews.com/ https://swprs.org/ https://dailyexpose.co.uk https://dailysceptic.org Footnotes: The first five footnotes are printed below with the complete 65 footnotes available at Common Ground’s website www.commonground.ca i) Pierre Bourdieu, Sur la télévision, Paris, Seuil, 1996, 82. ii) Ioannidis J. “The infection fatality rate of COVID-19 inferred from seroprevalence data,” Bull World Health Organ., Epub Oct. 14, 2020 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/33716331/). The British Medical Journal, citing this article, reported: “Clearly, mortality is agestratified from covid-19. The corrected median estimates of IFP [Infection Fatality Rate] for people aged lower than 70 years is currently 0.05%,  which, for the population less vulnerable to deaths, is similar to influenza. However overall estimates for covid-19 are higher [i.e., 0.23%], due to the higher fatality rate in elderly people.” BMJ October 6, 2020 (https:// www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m3883/rr). iii) Laurent Mucchielli, “How is built the ‘legitimate information’ on the Covid crisis,” UMR 7305, CNRS and Aix-Marseille University, April 2020 (https://www.mediterraneeinfection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/ MS-Mucchielli.pdf). Translation from French. iv) Rick Edmonds, June 24, 2021, by Rick Edmonds, “US ranks last among 46 countries in trust in media, Reuters Institute report finds,” June 24, 2021 (https://www.poynter. org/ethics-trust/2021/us-ranks-last-among46-countries-in-trust-in-media-reuters-institute-report-finds/). v) Global Conference for Media Freedom: London 2019 (https://www.gov.uk/government/topical-events/global-conference-formedia-freedom-london-2019). The Conference website states that “It is supported by Luminate,” (https://luminategroup.com/) which in turn was founded by the Omidyar Group (omidyargroup.com ).
Wide selection of used books In all categories. Some choice esoteric and occult material. All 50% off the current retail price. Visit us for the best bargains around.
TANGLEWOOD BOOKS 2306 W. Broadway @ Vine (in Kits) 604-736-8876
75th Anniversary Nuremberg Trials (November 1945 – October 1, 1946 )
his trial must form a milestone in the history of civilization, not only marking that right, in the end, shall triumph over evil, but also that ordinary people of the world, and I make no distinction between friend and foe, are now determined that the individual must transcend the state, The state laws are made for man, that through them he may achieve a fuller life, a higher purpose, and a greater dignity.” - October 1, 1946 Sir Hartley Shawcross
Common Ground is planning to host an event on October 1 to honour and learn from the 75th anniversary of the Nuremberg Trials where officers were held accountable for their crimes against humanity during WW2. Due to ever-changing government regulations at press time we are unable to secure a venue. We certainly will endeavour to find the best location for such a timely event. October 1, 1946 was the concluding day of the Nuremberg Trials in 1946. The verdict was read, and war criminals were sentenced. Common Ground will host a panel of experts to discuss the Nuremberg Trials, what lessons we have learnt and how to apply them in our lives today.
“There comes a point when a man must refuse to answer to his leader if he is also to answer to his own conscience”. If you are interested in knowing about this event, please be in touch: NT75event@gmail.com
What works and what doesn’t when it comes to masks
sion, however that is impossible as 99% of all viral particles are airborne and enter our eyes and pores of our skin just as easily as mouth and nose. They travel through the air and can stay airborne for hours, if not days, depending on size and air movements. It is impossible for any filtering respirator, much less a piece of cloth or paper fitted over your mouth and nose, to protect you or anyone else from viral transmission. By trapping heat and moisture, the inside material of your cover stays warm and moist, which is the perfect environment for harmful bacteria to form, grow and multiply, right in front of your mouth and nose. These closed covers are all bacteria generators. What effect does this have in hospitals on patient infection and poor decision making by health care professionals? Does this bacteria generator increase the risk of patient infection? Does the forced low oxygen atmosphere caused by the
Endnotes: The above was written as a letter to Deena Hinshaw, Alberta’s Chief Medical Officer in response to her Government Health Services mandate that all Canadians wear an N95 disposable, surgical or non-medical mask in public to reduce the likelihood of transmitting or developing a condition from the coronavirus known as COVID-19. Chris Schaefer is a Respirator Specialistin Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Schaefer prints pamphlets containing the above information and distributes them for free. If you would like others to read his pamphlets on the efficacy and safety of N-95 and other masks, please forward a donation to help with printing costs: maskbrochure@gmail. com. Chris can be reached for questions or comments at firstname.lastname@example.org. Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDA) or product safety data sheet are documents that list information relating to occupational safety and health for the use of various substances and products. There is a duty to properly label substances on the basis of physico-chemical, health, or environmental risk.
closed cover contribute to the poor decisions made by health care professionals that result in 28,000 deaths in Canada every YEAR due to preventable medical errors? https://www.rcinet.ca/en/2019/10/28/thousands-diefrom-medical-errors-yearly-notes-advocacy-group/ Trapping heat and moisture also causes the degradation of the material of the cover which can cause the user to inhale the chemicals and fibres used in the manufacture of the cover. Our Children at Risk Wearing a breathing barrier will only harm your health and especially your child’s health. Why? Because children have a higher breathing rate than adults and require oxygen more frequently. Forcing your child to experience an oxygen deficient atmosphere is torture. https://www.dignity.dk/.../tortu.../tortureby-asphyxiation/ This does not include the forced chemical sanitizers our children are subject to in schools all day. These sanitizers falsely called “hand” are poison. Type in the brand name and product name
and the letters MSDS into an internet search to learn the truth. Anyone that has completed WHMIS training knows this. Common warnings regarding this product include: Wear gloves and goggles when handling. If skin contact occurs, flush with running water at least 15 minutes. Remember, many chemicals, including sanitizer, can enter our blood and organs simply through skin absorption, the exact same way that nicotine and testosterone through a medication patch do. Lastly, read the sanitizer label. It kills 99.99% of BACTERIA, not viruses. It has NO EFFECT on viruses. We have a lot of healthy bacteria in our bodies for digestion and other functions. What affect does this absorbed poison have on that? So if breathing barriers and sanitizer cause us harm, despite what you have been told by Government Health Services, how are you supposed to protect your health? What about the age-old, tried, tested and proven method of a healthy diet, clean water, avoidance of man-made foods, plenty of fresh air, sunshine, moderate exercise, restful sleep, laughter and avoidance of stress? We all have an immune system that can fight and overcome any COVID-19 threat if its healthy and we nurture it. Humanity has survived naturally for untold thousands of years. Now suddenly billionaires, certain government officials and medical officers are demanding us to accept an experimental chemical shot with no demonstrated health benefit. What’s in it for them? We must take control over our health as no one, is truly responsible for it – except us. Now that you know the truth and the criminal deception perpetrated on us, what are you going to do about it?
August / September
by Chris Schaefer have been teaching and conducting respirator fit testing for over 20 years and now currently for my company SafeCom Training Services Inc. My clients include all levels of government, our military, healthcare providers, educational institutions and private industry. I am a published author and a recognized authority on this subject. Respirator Masks Engineered for Breathing The mandated disposable N95, surgical and nonmedical masks are not actually by definition, even masks at all. Masks that cover mouth and nose must have engineered breathing openings that allow the easy flow of air in when we inhale and easy flow of air out when we exhale. Examples of masks include respirator masks, Halloween masks, scuba masks and hockey goalie masks. Lacking engineered openings, the mandated closed cover, traps hazardously high concentrations of exhaled carbon dioxide thereby causing the restriction of available oxygen, which the wearer is forced to inhale. It is very hazardous to re-inhale your exhaled carbon dioxide. These covers that are mandated are simply – breathing barriers. I also refer to them as closed covers and instruments of self-suffocation. Breathing Barriers Trap CO2 & Lowers Oxygen By lacking engineered inhalation and exhalation valves — unlike a real respirator, these closed cover breathing barriers cause the wearer, exposure to high carbon dioxide and low oxygen levels that are rated as Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health (IDLH). Normal carbon dioxide in air is approximately 400 PPM (parts per million). In April 2021, Health Canada set the indoor exposure limit to carbon dioxide at 1000 PPM. Residential indoor air quality guidelines: Carbon dioxide — Canada.ca I have personally measured carbon dioxide levels within two minutes of wearing at over 40,000 PPM. Normal Oxygen in air is 20.9%. I have personally measured oxygen levels within two minutes of wearing as low as 17.5%. What the ongoing effects of these hazardous air exposures will have on the wearers’ health will vary. However, if I were to measure these exact same levels inside a confined space, in which workers were present, I would have to initiate an immediate evacuation alarm to get them out. If hazardous air for yourself and your children isn’t enough of a concern for you to ditch the breathing barrier, then I have a couple more good reasons for you. Closed Covers Breed Harmful Bacteria Besides trapping exhaled carbon dioxide and creating a low oxygen atmosphere, these breathing barriers also trap heat and moisture. I know you have been told that the cover catches droplets that stop virus transmis-
Heritage Gardens A S U S TA I N A B L E C E M E T E R Y
Say No to Medical Apartheid
by Ted Kuntz t is critical that we not engage in discriminatory behaviour based on COVID injections for the following reasons: COVID-19 Injections have not received formal approval None of the four products promoted as COVID vaccines have received formal Health Canada approval based on demonstrated safety and efficacy. These products are still considered “experimental”. Those partaking in these injections are subjects in ongoing Phase III clinical trials. The results of these clinical trials will not be released until the conclusion of the trials. (Moderna October 27, 2022 and Pfizer January 31, 2023) Injections are not vaccines These products are not “vaccines”. The use of this language by Health Canada, politicians and the mainstream media is deceptive and even fraudulent. There is no substantiated evidence that these injections prevent either infection or transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The only claimed benefit is that this technology may reduce symptoms. If these products function as claimed, they are technically “treatments”, not “vaccinations” or “immunizations”. Gene Therapy Technology A more accurate description is that these products involve the injection of never before used “synthetic gene therapy technology”. By the manufacture’s own admission, the mRNA gene therapy does not convey immunity, does not preclude infection by a virus, and does not block the development of COVID-19 symptoms. These products merely convey to the recipient the capacity to produce a S1 spike protein endogenously by the introduction of a synthetic mRNA sequence. This technology has never before been used as a vaccine on a mass scale. The long term impact of this genetic experiment is unknown. Safety and efficacy have not been proven The clinical trial data has yet to be made publicly available, therefore the
August / September
ɶɶ What we are being exposed to are the claims of the vaccine industry’s marketing departments, not evidence-based results. We help families arrange meaningful memorialization and ceremony in a direct-cremation world. We can help you too.
604-538-0074 19082 16th Ave. Surrey, BC, V3Z 9V2
claims of “safety and efficacy” have not been proven by independent third party review of the data. What we are being exposed to are the claims of the vaccine industry’s marketing departments, not evidence-based results. It is unlawful to advertise that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made. The fact is, these products have not been studied long enough to demonstrate either safety or efficacy. As a result, every party claiming the safety and efficacy of these gene therapy technologies are violating the law. Multiple legal challenges addressing this are in progress. Safer Treatments Exist Safer and more effective treatments exist, prophylactically and during all phases of COVID disease, thus negating the use of an experimental genetic product. There is robust evidence that Ivermectin reduces mortality by 80%. Unfortunately, access to treatments as Ivermectin and HCQ is blocked by Health Canada. Those responsible need to be held accountable for causing unnecessary injury and death. Vaccinated Transmit Disease
Injected individuals are just as capable of transmission as are non-injected individuals. No argument can be made that these injections ought to be imposed under the guise that they contribute to making public spaces safer. To discriminate based solely upon injection status is without scientific, medical or legal justification. Violation of Personal Rights
ɶɶ To discriminate based solely upon injection status is without scientific, medical or legal justification. What we are witnessing is the most egregious violation of our inherent rights and freedoms in our lifetime. The intentional and organized effort to remove medical choice and to extort the public into submission is a serious threat to individual freedom. Those advocating for coercive measures are creating a medical apartheid based solely on whether one has participated in the safety trials for an experimental product. Coercion is Not Consent All medical treatments, including vaccination, are subject to the ethical and legal requirement of informed and voluntary consent. All provincial health acts, professional codes of ethics, and international agreements such as the Nuremberg Code and the Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights, require informed consent. The Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights describes consent as follows: “Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only
to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.” The Nuremberg Code, developed in response to the medical abuses of the Nazi regime, describes informed voluntary consent as “the person involved should be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.” The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms supports the inherent right of Canadians to refuse an unwanted medical treatment without disadvantage or prejudice. The Supreme Court of Canada has recognized this inherent right under s.7 of the Charter. However, despite our inherent and acknowledged rights and ethics, governments, schools, employers, businesses and even community organizations are participating in coercive measures to impose these treatments on those for whom it is unwanted and unwarranted. Vaccine coercion places employment, access to daily life, health, and individual freedom at serious risk, and those in positions to impose or discriminate at legal risk. What is happening today is larger than the discussion of COVID-19 injections. What is being played out on the world’s stage is a referendum on humanity’s freedoms. What is being decided, with little thought or discussion, is whether individuals have the right to medical choice, bodily sovereignty, and informed consent, and whether parents have the right to make medical decisions for their children, or whether medical choice belongs to the state. The compulsory application of an unproven medical treatment is without any judicial, medical or ethical precedent. No law has been passed that says that a healthy population must subject themselves to a
medical experiment. The development of a vaccine passport system is a system of compliance and control that will change everything that we hold precious in a free and democratic society. Once we open Pandora’s Box and allow the state to be the determiner of what goes into our body and that of our children and grandchildren, where will this end? Will annual influenza vaccination be required going forward? Will every recommended booster be required? What else will be required under the guise of “the greater good”. How many violations of our right to informed consent and medical privacy will be imposed under the guise of public safety? Who decides? Have we forgotten the lessons of Germany in the 1940’s, South Africa, Soviet gulags, Rwanda, and Native residential schools? What happened in Germany didn’t start with extermination camps. It started with one party controlling the media. One party controlling the message. One party deciding what is truth. One party censoring speech and silencing opposition. One party dividing citizens into “us” and “them” and calling on their supporters to harass “them”. It started when good people turned a blind eye and let it happen. Humanity has been down this path too often. When people start fearing each other, intolerance is the new normal. Vitriol against those who don’t want the vaccine amounts to extortion and persecution. Peoples’ ability to discern has been limited to one narrow censored media landscape. These are the warning signs of pharmaceutical colonization. I lost a son to vaccine injury. I learned the hard way that what the government says the science says with regards to vaccine safety and efficacy, and what the science actually says, are two different things. I spent the last 30 years researching vaccines and I assure you that these injections are not as safe, effective or necessary as we have been led to believe. Most people are completely unaware of the significant debate raging in the scientific community and the censorship at play with regards to this COVID “pandemic” Those with knowledge, expe- continued p.21…
Processing the Past Through the Present A whole person approach to healing and reducing symptoms related to birth trauma, pre- and post-operative procedures, fibromyalgia, concussion syndrome, TMJ
NOW AVAILABLE: DISTANCE HEALING
Elaine Hanson Loo
Wild Oil of Oregano
certified organic ingredients • 100% Oregano leaves picked in the • Mediterranean wilderness Carvacrol, High Life Force • High your immune system strong • Keeps with most conditions • Helps and external usage • Internal • Thousands of satisfied users
August / September
Biodynamic Craniosacral Therapy
the best place to be
We offer frequency bonuses, three sizes of listings, and a wide range of categories To book your listing email: email@example.com
ART & MUSIC YES YOU CAN
Lynn McGown singing teacher / vocal coaching
EAST IS EAST EXPERIENCE THE EAST WITH YOUR TASTE BUDS
604-734-5881 Now at our new location to 3035 West Broadway (Formerly Calhoun’s)
Do you love to sing in the shower only to clam up if you think other people are listening? Discover your own voice and full potential of your talent with Lynn McGown. We all have our own unique voice. Through breathing and body awareness techniques, vocal warm-ups and lots of singing, you are guided
to discover a powerful and authentic sound to build your confidence, energy level, wellbeing and health. All lessons are individually tailored: from shy beginners to professional performance coaching. Register for vocal workshops (last Sunday of each month) and/ or one-on-one vocal singing coaching.
LYNN MCGOWN Call to set up lesson tel. 604-222-4113 www.lynnmcgown.com www.celtictraditions.ca
RESTAURANTS “East Is East is a place where you are encouraged to talk to your neighbours. This is definitely not the Ritz, but it certainly is Kits. From plumbers to publishers, hippies to generation whatever, this place has special appeal.” - Owen Williams, Common Ground Visit our other location 4433 Main Street @ 28th 604-879-2020
T h e
Now open for dine-in takeout & delivery!
The Naam Vegetarian Restaurant For years voted “Best Vegetarian” in the Georgia Straight and in Vancouver Magazine’s “Readers’ Choice”. Open seven days a week, licensed, wood fireplace, heated patio. 2724 West 4th Ave. 604-738-7151. thenaam.com
NUTRITION Consultation with dietitian/author Vesanto Melina. ($295 for 2-1/2 hours) includes personalized nutritional analysis; recipes; menu planning. For busy people; pregnancy; children, seniors. firstname.lastname@example.org 778-379-5377 nutrispeak.com becomingvegan.ca kickdiabetescookbook.com
Lead author of Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics’ current vegetarian position paper; and of award books on plant-based nutrition Becoming Vegan: Comprehensive Edition; Becoming Vegan: Express Edition; plus the very new Kick Diabetes Cookbook, all with Brenda Davis. Online & at bookstores.
HEALTH & HEALING Wellspring Vision Improvement Program
Making a positive difference
Dr. Weidong Yu www.TCMRP.com
Wellspring Vision Improvement Program (WVIP) was developed in 1999 by Dr. Weidong Yu, a world renowned Doctor of Traditional Chinese Medicine. WVIP is a comprehensive Holistic health program based on Chinese herbal medicine, Acupuncture, Acupressure, Qigong, Food and Nutrition. WVIP may be
beneficial for patients with conditions such as: * Retinitis Pigmentosa * Macular degeneration * Glaucoma * Eye Bleeding
* Red eyes, Dry eyes * Eye fatigue * Far sightedness * Blurry Vision
August / September
INTUITIVE ARTS DR. ANNE MCMURTRY Channelled Readings, Reiki & Crystal Healing ANNE’S ABILITY opens a line of communication between you and your spiritual guides allowing them to speak directly to you. Reiki and crystal healings and workshops are also available. 604-734-8219 VANCOUVER
BUSINESS SERVICES Gentle Choices for Eco-friendly Families: Cloth diapers, Baby Carriers, Baby Gifts, Cloth Diaper Trial Program, Gift Certificates, Workshops & much more. Shop Online. NEW LOCATION: Country Club Centre, 9-3200 North Island Highway, Nanaimo Cristi Lundman: 250-585-5552 www.huckleberrybabyshop.com
If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough. – Albert Einstein PSYCHOLOGY, THERAPY & COUNSELLING
ARE YOU READY FOR A CHANGE?
Therapist / Counselor since 1975
Lorraine Milardo Bennington, success coach, psychologist and hypnotherapist, has been practising hypnosis for over 30 years and skillfully integrates intuition and hypnotherapy into her coaching and counselling practice. Lorraine gently guides people in the process of transformation, assisting them to connect
with their higher selves and to reclaim joy and personal power in their lives. Lorraine has returned to Vancouver after 10 years living, studying and working on Kauai and Maui. Most Ext.Med. plans reimburse psychologists’ fees. 778-331-8860 | email@example.com www.creativetransformations.ca
Only by Working With the Whole Person Can You Achieve Truly Permanent and Effective Change.
is because you have not gotten to the root causes. Completion of any problem comes only when you have resolved your issues physically, emotionally, mentally and spiritually and the underlying reasons for repetitive patterns of behavior are uncovered and
resolved. If you are fed up and want to do something radical about your predicament, give me a call at 604-261-2788 email: firstname.lastname@example.org or visit my web page at www.johnarnoldphd--reichianandyogictherapist.com
If problems and issues keep popping up in your life and you are STILL STUCK, it
John Arnold Ph.D.
YOU CAN OVERCOME LIMITING BELIEFS AND OPEN UP TO YOUR JOY! Success Coaching Hypnotherapy - Weight Loss, Stop Smoking, Athletic Performance, Blocks to Success/Fear of Failure, Age Regression, Anxiety, Phobias. Couples Counselling
August / September
Lorraine Milardo Bennington M.Ed. (Counselling) Reg. Psychologist #815
Therapy of the Whole Person
For appointment, please call 604-737-7876 Dr. Weidong Yu, Dr.TCM Wellspring Clinic 916 West King Edward Ave. (south east corner of King Edward Mall at Oak & King Edward) Vancouver, BC
Finding the Courage to Break the Spell A Global Referendum on Freedom by Julius Ruechel
To all the silent good people watching our society tear itself in two, this essay is for you. his is a war about the role of government. It is about your freedom to think, to speak, and to ask questions, and about whether your individual autonomy is downgraded to a conditional privilege or whether it remains a right. It is a war about whether you are to remain a citizen or become a subject. It is about who owns you; you or the state. The question at the forefront of this psychological battle is about whether we will remain a society based on legal equality and inalienable rights or whether, in the name of safety, equity, and political correctness, we will allow ourselves to be reduced to a society of masters and servants. This was the norm throughout much of human history, with the masters granting or withdrawing conditional privileges to pursue whatever they perceive as the greater good.
ɶɶ In a free and open society, freedom is the greater good. In a free and open society, freedom is the greater good. So, in a sense, what is playing out on a grand scale is a global referendum on freedom. The consequences of this referendum will be with us long after the virus fades away. In this referendum, you don’t get to cast your vote at the polls. Your choice to speak out or stay silent in the face of the naked emperor is your vote. Both options come with terrible risks: the consequences of being bulldozed by the regime if you speak
out versus the servile future that is waiting for you if you don’t. There is no option to simply sit on the sidelines of this referendum. Those who choose silence are, in effect, signalling that their freedom is worth less to them than the discomfort of speaking out and facing the consequences. They are, in effect, legitimizing the regime’s use of intimidation by showing that it works.
perish than to live as slaves.”
-Winston S. Churchill
Read the full article here - https://www.juliusruechel. com/2021/07/the-emperor-has-no-clothes-finding.html The Emperor Has No Clothes: Finding the Courage to Break the Spell
ɶɶ Those who choose silence are legitimizing the regime’s use of intimidation. There is no knight in shining armour that can ride to our rescue. We have to do this ourselves — together. The magic ingredient in this war is the courage to allow yourself to be counted among the counter chorus. It really is that simple. You are either swept along by the stampede or you dig your heels in. These are your two choices. Freedom on one side, servitude on the other. A right comes with the responsibility to exercise that right when your or anyone else’s rights are under attack. Rights derive their legitimacy only through the willingness of citizens to defend them, for themselves and for each other. If the willingness to speak your mind in public is missing, you have no rights. “If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to
Who Is Julius Ruechel? “The less you know about me, the less reason you will have to trust me. Which means you will be forced to consider the quality of the evidence I lay on the table based solely on its own merits. And you will have nothing but my thought processes to help you judge whether the conclusions I reach are justified. And in that, both science and democracy will be well served.” https://www.juliusruechel.com/p/about-me.html
…Say no the medical apartheid, from pg. 19
Families affected by vaccine injury and death are on their own. It is critical that we openly discuss this matter. The implications are too important to allow fear to rule the day. We must rely on independent facts and source documents from the clinical trials instead of drug based marketing propaganda or political opportunism. We need to truly value freedom and defend it. Ted Kuntz, President Vaccine Choice Canada Suggested links for those wishing to explore these topics more fully: Canada Health Alliance https://canadahealthalliance.org
Americas Frontline Doctors https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org Great Barrington Declaration https://gbdeclaration.org Vaccine Choice Canada https://vaccinechoicecanada.com Constitutional Rights Centre https://www.constitutionalrightscentre.ca The Persecution of Canadian Physicians by Organized Medicine https://www.jccf.ca/the-persecution-ofcanadian-physicians-by-organized-medicineduring-the-covid-19-pandemic/
The COVID-19 vaccines are the most dangerous vaccines ever injected. It is unconscionable that our government and public health officials insist on compliance to experimental COVID-19 injections when the survival rate for COVID illness for all ages, according to WHO’s own data, is 99.85%. Most Canadians are unaware that COVID vaccine manufacturers have been granted legal and financial immunity and thus are not accountable for any injury or death caused by their products. And while the Government of Canada has promised a COVID vaccine injury compensation program, no meaningful compensation has been forthcoming.
August / September
rience or information that is counter to the government’s pro-vaccine narrative, no matter their position, profession or area of expertise, are censored and threatened. The public perceives there is medical consensus when nothing could be further from the truth. There are significant efforts by many in the medical community, not reported in the media or acknowledged by governments, to halt this unlawful and dangerous experiment. There are more reports of serious adverse events and deaths in six months following COVID-19 injections than the total number of adverse events and deaths reported following all vaccines combined over a thirty year period.
Government data exposes pandemic lies by Anonymous UBC Scientist
COVID-19: One Year of the Pandemic in BC
n March 11, 2021, the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control (BC CDC) published a PDF of a Powerpoint presentation titled “COVID-19: One Year of the Pandemic in BC”.* This government document reveals that COVID-19 (the disease) had very little impact on the well-being of British Columbians overall, yet the official reaction (lockdowns, business closures, social isolation) may have caused significant harm and death. This article uses the BC CDC’s own reporting to expose the lack of justification for restrictive public health orders. * Their document is available at https://bit. ly/35EV6Rk, or found on the BC CDC website by searching for the title. It is the source of data and images used here. If the document gets moved, it should still be on the Internet Archive Wayback Machine.
August / September
Pandemics not a threat The World Health Organization (WHO) definition of a pandemic once referred to simultaneous epidemics worldwide “with enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses”. However, in 2009, just before the H1N1 Swine Flu was deemed a pandemic, this definition was changed to ignore amount of illness and death. From the Swine Flu in 2009 to today, the official meaning of “pandemic” has only referred to something widespread, whether it harms anyone or not. In other words, officially, a pandemic may pose no threat to public health at all. This updated definition allowed the WHO to declare COVID-19 a pandemic, with no evidence of threat. COVID-19 is the disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. That virus is a new strain of the SARS-CoV-1 virus (also first identified in China), which killed only a few hundred people worldwide. Page 12 of the BC CDC report (figure 1) compares All-Cause Mortality Rates in BC for 2009-2020.
Pandemics were declared in 2009 (Swine Flu) and 2020 (COVID-19), yet those years showed less overall death than in 2017, a non-pandemic year. This illustrates how the word “pandemic” no longer designates a exceptional public health threat. You may have heard (figure 3) media reports discussing the number of “cases” of COVID-19. A “case” merely means a positive test for the virus, not risk of disease. Thus, according to official definitions, it is entirely possible to have a pandemic with millions of cases yet little or no disease. The BC CDC briefing referenced here is consistent with those definitions. Page 10 of the report breaks down cases, hospitalizations, ICU admissions and deaths by age. Note the brown bars which indicate the general population distribution by age, as reference. People under age 30 had the most cases yet the least disease (hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and deaths). Conversely, people age 70 and over had the least cases yet the most disease. This demonstrates that, ironically, testing positive for COVID-19 was associated with less disease. Nonetheless, both mainstream media and public health officials consistently reported number of cases as an indicator of threat to our health. This emphasis was not just inaccurate, but deceptive. The graph below (figure 2) also reveals that risk from COVID-19 was negligible for people under age 30, and virtually non-existent for youth and children. The strong relationship between age and risk is especially important when considering the data below.
COVID-19 had minimal impact Page 13 (figure 3) of the report compares the impact
of COVID-19 with other causes of loss of life. The center graph shows that cancer, heart disease, stroke and diabetes accounted for more than half of deaths in BC for 2020. Those diseases have lifestyle and environmental precursors, meaning that public health measures could lessen their impact. In contrast, death attributed to COVID-19 accounted for about 3% of deaths, less than seven other causes. Most of these causes of death predominantly affect the elderly. This was true for COVID-19, for which median age of death was 86, older than the average BC life expectancy of 84. A more appropriate analysis of disease impact is displayed in the rightmost graph, ranking causes by potential years of life lost (YLL). This considers age of death because (for example) death from suicide or overdose steals away decades more life than does death from Alzheimer’s. Life lost from COVID-19 ranks 11th, below cancer, overdoses, heart disease, stroke, diabetes, lower respiratory disease, liver disease, suicide, accidents, and even seasonal flu. Any measures taken to lessen the impact of COVID-19 would similarly affect seasonal flu. Regardless of how effective those measures were, they don’t change the reality that the impact of the “pandemic” was no more than a typical flu season. Unfortunately, those exceptional continued p.23…
…Government data, from pg. 22
Are vaccinations causing high excess mortality in British Columbia
saw record breaking unexplained ernment has an obligation to disclose excess deaths. In July 2021 at least 400 causes of such mortality trends as these orldwide lockdowns more BC residents died with no explaare closely correlated with the mass vaccame into effect in nation provided by the government cination program that has seen more than March 2020. ImmeThis increasing trend has somewhat eight million doses distributed so far. diately, various pubcontradicted the public health restricSuch disclosure should be classified by lic health measures tions on the ground, which tended to be vaccination status, date of vaccination, triggered substantial collateral effects, less severe in 2021 as compared to 2020. age, cause of death, pre-existing condiwhich included increasing all-cause mortion and any other pertinent factality. Such phenomena were caused tors. Without such disclosure and by panic, despair, government driven relevant analysis, the case for more medical rationing, fear, utilization of vaccinations, particularly under improper medications, faulty medithe coercive methods as vaccinacal procedures, overuse of DNRs tion passports, threatens to become and end-of-life therapies in the longimmoral if not outright criminal. term care facilities, and hunger in the At least, 80% of all BC Coviddeveloping nations. 19 fatalities have taken place in A rapid vaccination clinic in the long-term care facilities, where Prince Rupert associated with a average life expectancy of residents 150% mortality spike was most is less than two years. Assuming notable that all Covid-19 deaths contribMy analysis of all-cause mortality uted to excess deaths is an overesin British Columbia has concluded timate. For conservative purposes, that in 2020, lockdowns caused this bias has not been removed at least 4 times as many deaths as from the numbers below. Covid-19. In addition, the recent 1 The rollout of the second dose Statcan report covering the period at the end of May 2021 announced up to May 2021 stated “Based on a veritable tsunami of excess morthe provisional data, from the end tality. The following three months of March 2020 to the end of April saw record breaking unexplained 2021, there were 7,150 more deaths excess deaths. In the month of July than expected among those aged 0 *Data above shows Covid-19 vaccines rollouts 2021 alone, at least 400 more BC to 64 years. Over the same period, coincide with growing excess mortality. residents died with no explanation 1,600 COVID-19 deaths have been provided by the government. attributed to those younger than 65, Notably, 2021 was the year of the CovidAbout the Author: Alex Posoukh received suggesting that, in addition to COVID19 vaccines rollout. The timing of these MBA Finance from UBC. He has held a CPA 19 excess mortality may be related to the rollouts coincide with growing excess designation. His training and career primarily indirect consequences of the pandemic”. mortality. The first uptick in mortality focused on corporate finance management, This report seems to indicate that just in was observed in February 2021 as the financial modelling, statistics and regulathe first five months of 2021, excess morprovince of BC rolled out the vaccines in tory reporting. For any inquiries, please email tality in this age category became even long-term care facilities. Another uptick email@example.com or call 604-307-3733. more lopsided in favour of “other than Notes was registered in March 2021 when the Covid-19” causes as compared the 2020 1) https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily2 province began vaccinating the general data . quotidien/210809/dq210809a-eng.htm population. A rapid vaccination clinic After the rollout of the second dose in the town of Prince Rupert associated May 2021 the following three months 2) https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/dailywith a 150% mortality spike was most quotidien/210607/dq210607a-eng.htm notable4. Much of the excess mortality 3) https://alexposoukh.blogspot. associated with the first dose rollout was com/2021/08/province-of-bc-excess-mortalexplainable by the official Covid-19 staity.html?fbclid=IwAR2SR4t67rbIX6S1rcsLxpG tistics. Previously reported susceptibility B5XrJfRFPzrTMhelw8txKIfnsOrDFw3dU9oA to Covid-19 following the first injection 4) https://alexposoukh.blogspot. was predictably missed from the official com/2021/05/vaccination-campaign-innarrative5. prince-rupert.html?m=1 One month of such elevated mortality 5) https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/ is concerning enough, but three months 2021.03.08.21252200v1.full.pdf in a row is truly unprecedented. The govby Alex Posoukh
ɶɶ A rapid vaccination clinic in Prince Rupert associated with a 150% mortality spike was most notable
August / September
social and economic restrictions, purported to protect us from COVID19, did have a profound effect on public health. That graph (figure 3) also reveals that overdoses rank 2nd overall in terms of YLL, at about 8 times the loss from COVID-19. According to a 2021 July 26 Statistics Canada statement, “the Public Health Agency of Canada recently reported that apparent opioid-related deaths … were at their highest from April to September 2020, following the introduction of COVID-19 prevention measures”. Overdose deaths in BC rose 74% over 2019; increasing life lost far greater than did COVID-19. The evidence strongly suggests that oppressive public health orders may have killed far more people than the pandemic did: the “cure” was genuinely worse than the disease. It is important to note that the evidence presented here is for 2020, before vaccination programs had any significant effect. A disease that accounts for only 3% of deaths and ranks 11th for loss of life hardly warrants experimental medical interventions imposed on the general population. Vaccination is also not justified medically, as demonstrated by this research paper: “A majority of uninfected adults show pre-existing antibody reactivity against SARS-CoV-2”, published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Clinical Investigation. Healthy immune systems were already prepared. There was never any scientific justification for mass vaccination. The data revealed here is from official government agencies. If you have any doubts, please look up the sources yourself. Government reports disclose that COVID-19 was never a serious threat in BC, yet lockdown measures cost more lives. Dr. Bonnie Henry, Adrian Dix, Mike Farnworth, John Horgan, and all public health officials should have known this reality. Yet, they continue to impose harsh social and economic restrictions, with significant, life-threatening burdens, particularly for the disadvantaged. Had COVID-19 not been (arbitrarily) declared a “pandemic”, and used to terrify the public and justify violations of basic human rights, we would have all been far better off. When will public health officials be held accountable for this gross malpractice? A visual summary of the information presented here is shown in this video (note that the URL is case-sensitive): tiny.cc/GoodNewsBC