Transcript Golden
October 17, 2013
50 cents
A Colorado Community Media Publication
ourgoldennews.com
Jefferson County, Colorado • Volume 147, Issue 46
North Mountains area plan is approved
MEET HONEY BEAR
Residents object to commercial area By Amy Woodward
awoodward@ourcoloradonews.com
Shannon, right, holds his son Tristyn while petting Honey Bear, a friendly llama owned by Stan Dunlavy, right, during the 2nd annual Cowboy Carnival at Aido Chiropractic in Golden on Oct. 12. Free food, and hay rides were just some of the activities for health conscious visitors. A clothes drive for the homeless, and free evaluations were sponsored by Aido, a family practice and that holds the largest pediatric office in its field in Colorado. Photo by Amy Woodward
Candidates at odds on Amendment 66 By Vic Vela
vvela@ourcoloradonews.com A recent Jefferson County school board candidate forum showed the extent to which the hopefuls differ on major areas of education policy. Whether it’s a tax hike aimed at increasing school funding, a controversial student data gathering system, or the always hot-button topic of school vouchers, audience members left Holy Shepard Lutheran church in Lakewood on Oct. 10 with a clear view of where each candidate stands on the issues. The six Board of Education candidates gave different opinions on the issue of education funding, and whether Jeffco taxpayers should support a statewide ballot question aimed at boosting it. Candidates Tonya Aultman-Bettridge, Jeff Lamontagne and Gordon “Spud” Van de Water each support Amendment 66, which would create $950 million in new taxes annually to overhaul the state’s school finance formula. Lamontagne believes that passage of Amendment 66 is necessary because the state “has cut and cut” education spending over the years, resulting in Colorado students getting $2,000 less in per-pupil funding than the national average. “It puts our state and all of our kids at a great disadvantage,” he said. But Julie Williams, John Newkirk and Ken Witt oppose the tax hike, primarily because Jeffco taxpayers will end up paying more into the new school finance system than the district will be getting back. Newkirk believes that Jeffco will only getting back about 55 cents for every tax dollar, while other school districts take in more. “Show me a bill that returns 100 percent POSTAL ADDRESS
Jeff Lamontagne speaks during a Jefferson County Board of Education candidate forum in Lakewood on Oct. 10. Fellow candidates John Newkirk, Julie Williams (center) and Tonya Aultman-Bettridge are also pictured. Photo by Vic Vela of taxes back to Jeffco, and that’s something I would support,” he said. It’s true that Jeffco will not get back a total return on investment, under Amendment 66. But backers like Van de Water see the district getting back much more money than what opponents say, perhaps close to 90 percent, when it’s all said and done. And Van de Water told the audience that it’s important to understand that Amendment 66 is a “statewide school finance plan” and that the measure is meant to help poor rural and inner-city schools get more funding. “Jeffco is providing that boost and that’s OK with me,” said Van de Water.
The candidates also gave varying opinions on the district’s intention to pilot a controversial classroom dashboard that will collect student information into a single database. Supporters like Aultman-Bettridge say the system will enable students to get more personalized instruction. She also said that teachers having to bounce from one data system to another “takes away from teaching time.” “I’m very excited about the opportunity to bring the data together in one place to better personalize education,” she said. “Of
The Jeffco planning commission unanimously approved the North Mountains Area Plan into the Comprehensive Master Plan or CMP despite the disapproval and objection of some residents of Golden Gate Canyon. The plan was developed in order to better organize all 13 community plans into separate chapters within a single document. The planning commission adopted the plan in December of 2012. Since then, four community plans have been approved and integrated into the plan including the South Plains, the Central Plains, the North Plains and the Indian Hills area plans. On Oct. 9, the planning commission was confronted with the latest adoption plan; the North Mountains Area Plan. The area up for discussion included land-use recommendations for Golden Gate Canyon and Coal Creek Canyon, and a 2.3acre community center in the Golden Gate area, zoned for commercial use. Golden Gate residents do not want to see any commercial development and have asked for that land use to be removed from the plan previously. “I don’t understand why the county is not listening to the community, the people that live there every day,” Terri Costeldia, Colorado state grange officer, and fifth-generation resident of Golden Gate Canyon said. “We’re four miles away from a 7-11, this makes no sense to me at all.” Costeldia is a descendant of the Ramstetter family, who has spent decades preserving the open space in Golden Gate, she said. Costeldia’s comments are similar to other comments made at past community meetings where Golden Gate residents repeatedly stated they want to preserve the open space associated with the area, and do not want or need a commercial business. “It does not meet the needs and the desires of the residents of Golden Gate Canyon,” Dave Rogers, resident, said. “It doesn’t meet the needs and desires because there’s no compelling problem for needs that are to be satisfied,” he said. Rogers questioned why county staff deemed the area necessary for commercial development when staff has been told by residents that development is not necessary. “Do you find that the lack of having
Views continues on Page 23
Plan continues on Page 23
GOLDEN TRANSCRIPT (ISSN 0746-6382)
OFFICE: 110 N. Rubey Dr, Unit 120, Golden, CO 80403 PHONE: 303-566-4100 A legal newspaper of general circulation in Jefferson County, Colorado, the Golden Transcript is published weekly on Thursday by Mile High Newspapers, 110 N. Rubey Dr., Ste. 120, Golden, CO 80403. PERIODICALS POSTAGE PAID AT GOLDEN, COLORADO. POSTMASTER: Send address change to: Golden Transcript, 110 N. Rubey Dr., Unit 120, Golden, CO 80403 DEADLINES: Display advertising: Fri. 11 a.m. Legal advertising: Fri.11 a.m. Classified advertising: Mon. 5 p.m.
GET SOCIAL WITH US The Golden Transcript wants to share the news. Check out and like our page on facebook. Search for Golden Transcript. While you are there search for Colorado Community Media’s page too.
Printed on recycled newsprint. Please recycle this copy.