Official portrait of Cory Booker, U.S. senator for New Jersey
Advertising Representation
Chicago Media Partners
Michael Tolliver (708)268-5518
Chicago News Weekly
2150 S. Canalport Ave. Suite 4-C14
Chicago, IL 60608
312. 877. 5151
Vol. 3 No 1
Thursday, April 3, 2025
Chicago News Weekly is published weekly on Thursday.
www.cnwmedia.com
advertising@cnwmedia.com
editorial@cnwmedia.com
Subscription $104 year
E notes
Becoming Our Own Role Models
It’s difficult to determine where to begin this conversation, but it’s one we must have. I often hear younger women—wrapped in their self-imposed glamour and often overinflated egos—declare that they have not experienced welcoming women willing to assist them in any way in the workplace. Seriously, I must tell you, that was hard to hear. I would ask again and again, “Really?” And over and over, the answer would be “Yes.” This causes me great concern and unease. So, I listened. Mind you, I had to examine the similarities among the women voicing this same shocking statement. I looked at their age, profession, interests, attitude, and focus. Most of them were between 25 and 45. Each considered herself “educated.” Many saw themselves as special— self-proclaimed privileged individuals— in competition with the next woman. They worked in corporate America, education, sales, media, and medical professions, among others.
A consistent factor was that they did not come from parents who had been professionals, yet they still experienced a middle-class or hardworking blue-collar upbringing. They all knew that their degrees held value. Few, however, understood the extent to which the degree ended and their sense of self began. Too many believed it was all about the degree, that it alone was enough. They had no understanding of decorum. So, when they approached a seasoned, professionally polished woman, that woman immediately recognized what we call an “attitude” of self-importance emanating from the younger woman, which could have created an immediate schism. The older woman may have been offended by the lack of respect—born out of ignorance— given to her by the younger.
These exchanges, conducted within various businesses—from corporate and military settings to family-run enterpris-
es—all operate within structures that prioritize decorum, respect, position, and hierarchy.
Kai EL’ Zabar Editor-in-Chief
The lack of recognition from millennials is mind-blowing to me. I simply cannot understand how they have come to think about some things as they do. Their cavalier attitude toward time is unacceptable. I can tell you that the concept of a 9-to-5 job means little, if anything, to that generation as a whole. A superior at a company once shared with me that they had to let go of a young woman who never arrived on time for 90 days. When it was brought up with her for the final time, her response was, “But I got my work done.” Did it never occur to her that she could have gotten more done or had the opportunity to accomplish the unexpected during company time?
The young woman who disappointed me the most came highly recommended, and I hired her. She met the criteria and did a great job. Her shortcoming? “The job was too stressful.” She worked for only two months. Never did she come to me to express her discomfort or share her concerns so that we could explore ways to alleviate her stress.
Before her departure, she once asked me, “Why are older men attracted to me?” She confided that it made her question her attractiveness because young men didn’t approach her. I politely told her that her dresses were so short that, as she walked, one could see the cups of her buttocks— and perhaps that had something to do with it. I explained that younger men see such attire frequently and are therefore less likely to be intrigued. I further informed her that her dresses were too short for a professional setting, especially without stockings.
I was imparting female insight as well as professional guidance. She later told me she was offended by my comment— mind you, she had asked. As women embrace the fullness of who
they are, mature and professionally seasoned women may find themselves supporting other women, helping them reach the level of inner confidence and outward freedom they have found. Among those who are less sure of themselves and their place in the world, it may be more common to criticize or avoid other women rather than seek their help. The reality is that some things can only be learned from other women—just as there are aspects of being a man that can only be learned from other men. That said, I must acknowledge that some of the best advice I ever received about the corporate world came from two male mentors. However, women were always there for me—rallying around me, encouraging me to be better, to be my best, and offering invaluable advice.
We all recognize that we have much to learn from each other, regardless of gender. But sometimes, we need a supportive role model who provides a clear example of what we can become.
It seems there was once a time when women stood together in a bond of sisterhood, supporting one another. Have we become too independent—too absorbed in our own self-perception—to remember the value of that unity? It is up to us to put reality back into perspective and restore the sacred sisterhood we yearn for at our core.
If we envision a world where women support one another and help each other find their place in an ever-changing society, we can become the change we wish to see. Jealousy, envy, criticism, and judgment are refuges for the insecure. As we help others become self-assured, we create a world in which all people uplift one another, regardless of gender. It is up to women to change how women are viewed and understood—by each other and by the world at large.
photo credit: Dot Ward
Women, Wealth & Tequilla
The ladies gathered for Women & Wealth, on March 26th at ETC (404 S. Wells) to celebrate Women’s History Month, while honoring dynamic and accomplished women from diverse backgrounds in the financial industry. This sophisticated happy hour welcomed both men and women interested in expanding their financial network.
Honorees for the event were, Kai Bandele, Principal, Bandele Properties, Toi Salter, CEO, Salter Financial Management and Tiffany-Hill-Moore, CEO, Hill Financial Solutions.
The event was hosted by Clena Clay, and cocktails and small bites were sponsored by Volcan di mi Tierra additive free Tequillia.
Toni Preckwinkle Meet & Greet at Manny's
Last week, Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle held a meet and greet fundraiser at the
famous Manny’s Cafeteria and Delicatessen.
The A.I. The answer.is...
In today’s daily drama of politics, legal institutions, and ‘Everyday People,’ there’s a lot to grasp because there are layers upon layers of what’s really going on. Understanding it requires possessing an informed vocabulary and knowledge of the branches of government, which we’ve covered in a previous issue of Chicago News Weekly in this column.
Lately, amid all the other breaking news, the phrase Rule of Law has gained attention. But what does it mean, and why is it important or significant in America to all people?
Familiarize yourself with the following terms and their meanings. Consider how this information impacts your life and fuels you with a deeper understanding of what’s going on.
Synonyms for Rule of Law and Their Definitions
1. Legal Order – A structured system of laws that governs society, ensuring stability and predictability in legal matters.
2. Justice System – The framework of courts, laws, and legal institutions that administer justice fairly and impartially.
3. Constitutional Governance – A system where government power is limited and regulated by a constitution, ensuring legal accountability.
4. Due Process – The principle that indi-
viduals are entitled to fair legal proceedings and protection against arbitrary decisions.
5. Legal Framework – The overall structure of laws and regulations that dictate how a society functions.
6. Judicial Integrity – The impartiality and ethical standards upheld by courts to maintain justice and fairness.
7. Lawful Governance – A government operating strictly within the boundaries of established laws.
8. Democratic Legality – The adherence to legal principles that uphold democratic values and protect individual rights.
9. Legal Supremacy – The principle that laws, rather than individuals or groups, hold the highest authority in society.
10. Judicial Oversight – The role of courts in reviewing and ensuring the legality of government actions.
The Interconnection of These Terms
All these terms revolve around the fundamental principle that laws—not arbitrary decisions by individuals or groups—must govern society. Legal Order and Legal Framework provide the structure for implementing laws, while Judicial Integrity and Judicial Oversight ensure that laws are applied fairly. Due Process guarantees fairness in legal proceedings, while Constitutional Governance and Democratic Legality emphasize accountability and the
protection of rights. Legal Supremacy reinforces that no one is above the law, ensuring Lawful Governance within a functioning Justice System.
Together, these concepts ensure that societies operate based on fairness, equality, and accountability, forming the essence of the Rule of Law.
Definition of Rule of Law Abundance Rule of Law Abundance refers to a societal condition where legal principles are not only present but deeply embedded, widely respected, and effectively enforced. It goes beyond merely having laws—it ensures that justice, accountability, fairness, and legal stability flourish, creating an environment where rights and freedoms are protected for all. In such a society, laws are clear, accessible, and consistently applied, preventing corruption, arbitrary governance, and legal uncertainty.
Interconnection of Synonyms with Rule of Law Abundance
1. Legal Order & Legal Framework – A society with Rule of Law Abundance has a strong, well-developed legal order and framework where laws are comprehensive, organized, and effectively enforced.
2. Justice System & Judicial Oversight – The justice system functions efficiently, ensuring that courts operate fairly and that
judicial oversight prevents abuses of power.
3. Constitutional Governance & Legal Supremacy – In a society with an abundant Rule of Law, constitutional governance ensures that government actions are constrained by legal principles, reinforcing legal supremacy—where laws take precedence over personal or political interests.
4. Due Process & Judicial Integrity – Individuals enjoy due process, meaning fair and transparent legal proceedings, upheld by courts with judicial integrity that resist corruption or bias.
5. Lawful Governance & Democratic Legality – Governments in such societies practice lawful governance, ensuring that policies align with legal standards. Democratic legality guarantees that democratic principles, such as human rights and political freedoms, are protected through the law.
Rule of Law Abundance represents the highest state of legal integrity, where laws are not just present but function as a strong foundation for governance, justice, and individual rights. The synonyms listed above interconnect by reinforcing different aspects of this legal ecosystem—ensuring fairness, stability, accountability, and democratic values.
We all know, have heard of, or even met Oprah Winfrey—a woman who, from humble beginnings, built a global media empire.
Oprah’s journey is a master class in the power of asking boldly and leveraging every opportunity. Her story is a testament to the transformative impact of seeking help, taking risks, and creating platforms that not only elevate her but also empower millions. As we explore her incredible legacy during Women’s History Month, it becomes clear how her approach—embracing opportunities and even failures—aligns with the theme of using Other People’s Money (OPM) and the power of the ask to fuel dreams and influence women entrepreneurs.
Many admire Oprah Winfrey’s success. Yet, no success story is complete without failures. Oprah’s journey was marked by setbacks and moments of doubt, but each failure was met with an even stronger ask—a determination to learn, grow, and pivot when necessary. Her resilience in the face of rejection offers a vital lesson for aspiring women entrepreneurs: failure isn’t a reflection of inadequacy; it’s an essential part of the process that builds character and paves the way for success.
Oprah’s failures provided insights no textbook ever could. They forced her to ask tougher questions, seek deeper collaborations, and refine her vision. Every time she fell, she rose with a clearer understanding of what was needed, proving that the power of the ask isn’t weakened by failure—it’s strengthened by the lessons learned.
While we often celebrate Oprah’s bold, public successes, the true power of the ask is forged in quieter, more personal moments of struggle and vulnerability— when the stakes are high, and the risk of rejection looms large.
Oprah never hid the fact that her early life was far from easy. Raised in poverty and facing numerous challenges, she could have been defined by her circumstances. Instead, she chose to ask for more. Whether seeking mentors, demanding an education, or daring to dream bigger, she made a habit of asking for opportunities that others believed were out of reach. Her relentless pursuit of growth transformed her from a local
Dr. Sanja Rickette Stinson
The Power of the Ask The Unspoken Side of the Ask
news anchor into a media mogul, proving that the courage to ask can change the course of a life.
The unspoken side of the ask goes beyond public wins. It’s about the internal dialogue that builds resilience over time. Each rejection or failure forced Oprah to reevaluate her approach and strengthen her resolve. In these moments, asking wasn’t just a business strategy—it was a personal commitment. It was an affirmation that her ideas were worth pursuing, no matter the obstacles.
Oprah’s ability to ask for help and resources did more than propel her career—it built an ecosystem of support that allowed her to give back. Her philanthropic efforts, including scholarship programs and leadership academies, reflect her belief that asking for help is a two-way street. By asking and then sharing her success, she created pathways for others to follow. This cycle of asking, learning, and giving back is the quiet heartbeat of her legacy—often unspoken but essential to her impact.
The unspoken side of the ask also involves embracing vulnerability. For many women, the fear of showing weakness or uncertainty can be paralyzing. However, Oprah’s journey reminds us that vulnerability isn’t a liability—it’s a strength.
Acknowledging struggles and asking for help not only opens the door to valuable feedback but also inspires others to do the same. Vulnerability fosters authentic connections and trust, both critical for forming the partnerships and support networks that drive success.
In entrepreneurship, this means recognizing that every “no” or setback is an opportunity for growth. Each failure refines your vision and hones your approach. For Oprah, these moments were the crucible in which her resilience was forged, enabling her to ask more boldly and build a legacy that continues to empower women worldwide.
Today, as we celebrate Women’s History Month, we recognize that Oprah’s influence extends far beyond media. She has become a beacon for women entrepreneurs, inspiring countless women to step into their power and ask for what they deserve. Through leadership academies, mentorship programs, and public speaking, Oprah champions the art of asking as a fundamental ingredient for success.
For women navigating the challenges of entrepreneurship, Oprah’s legacy offers three critical takeaways:
Ask Boldly:
Don’t be afraid to dream big and ask for the opportunities you need. Whether seeking funding, mentorship, or strategic partnerships, bold asking is the first step toward change.
Leverage External Resources:
Embrace the power of Other People’s Money and resources. Build a network and collaborate with those who share your vision. Success is often a collective effort.
Learn from Failures:
View each setback as an opportunity
to refine your approach. Use failures as stepping stones to gain insights, adjust strategies, and emerge stronger.
As we honor Women’s History Month, let Oprah Winfrey’s journey—both her celebrated successes and unspoken struggles—serve as inspiration for every woman entrepreneur. Her life is a vivid reminder that the power of the ask can open doors, transform lives, and fuel dreams. Whether you’re just starting or looking to scale new heights, remember: your voice matters, and your ask can change the world.
Join us in embracing this legacy by mastering the art of asking—boldly, strategically, and resiliently. Let Oprah’s story be the spark that ignites your own journey to success, where every ask is not just a request for help but a declaration of your unstoppable potential.
Cory Booker The Man, The Mission, The Moment
His rhetoric was carefully crafted to appeal to both the moral sensibilities of voters and the pragmatic concerns of policymakers.
Washington, D.C. – In an extraordinary display of political endurance and conviction, Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) took to the Senate floor for 25 hours and 5 minutes, setting a new record for the longest continuous speech in the chamber’s history. The extended address, which began at 7 p.m. on March 31 and concluded at 8:05 p.m. on April 1, served as a pointed protest against President Donald Trump’s proposed cuts to Social Security and other social safety net programs. But Booker’s marathon speech was more than just a protest—it was a statement of moral clarity, a call to action, and perhaps a defining moment in his political legacy. As he stood for over a day, passionately laying out his vision for the nation, a larger question loomed: Is Cory Booker stepping into the role of the next great Black political leader in America?
Cory Booker
The Man, the Mission, the Moment Born in Washington, D.C., and raised in Harrington Park, New Jersey, Cory Booker’s rise in politics has been marked by relentless advocacy for social justice and economic equity. A graduate of Stanford University, where he played football, Booker later attended the University of Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar before earning his law degree from Yale. Booker first gained national attention as the mayor of Newark, New Jersey, where he was known for his hands-on leadership style—personally shoveling snow, running into burning buildings to save constituents, and engaging directly with community members on social media. His efforts in Newark focused on reducing crime, improving public housing, and revitalizing the struggling economy.
In 2013, Booker made history as the first Black senator from New Jersey after winning a special election to replace the late Frank Lautenberg. Since then, he has been an outspoken advocate on issues ranging from criminal justice reform to affordable healthcare and economic justice.
The Speech Heard Around the Country
Booker’s 25-hour speech was not just a political spectacle—it was an ideological battle cry. With no single piece of legislation at stake, the speech took on a broader mission: to expose what he views as the moral failings of the Trump administration’s policies, particularly its proposed cuts to social safety nets and the erosion of protections for vulnerable populations.
He opened with, …. I plan to deliver my words, “for as long as I am physically able. He continued at some point , “I rise tonight because I believe, sincerely, that our country is in crisis,” Booker declared. “For all Americans, this is a moral moment. It’s not left or right. It’s right or wrong.”
The speech was not just a protest against policy changes; it was a call to action, a challenge to the values Booker believes should define the United States. He warned that the nation was facing a moral reckoning, where decisions made
in Washington would have far-reaching consequences for millions of everyday Americans.
Throughout the night, Booker cited examples of families struggling to survive in an economy he argued was increasingly tilted toward the wealthy. He spoke of working-class families “forced to choose between paying for healthcare or keeping food on the table.” He painted a vivid picture of senior citizens, many of whom had worked their entire lives, now living in fear of losing their Social Security benefits. His words carried a deep sense of urgency, highlighting the personal stakes of the political battle at hand.
“We are at a moral crossroads,” Booker said with passionate conviction. “The very people who are being hurt by these policies are the people who have always made this country great. The working-class families who wake up every day and fight for a better life. The seniors who built this nation with their labor. The young people who want nothing more than the chance to dream and succeed.”
“Is it right to leave our children with a debt they did not incur?” Booker continued. His question reverberated through the Senate chamber, drawing attention to the crushing weight of student loan debt that has left a generation of young Americans financially burdened and disenfranchised.
The senator also called for a stronger commitment to addressing climate change, highlighting how environmental disasters disproportionately affect low-income communities. “When floodwaters rise, it’s not the wealthy who suffer,” he said. “It’s the poor, communities of color, the most vulnerable. And yet, we are dismantling the programs that could help mitigate these disasters.”
As Booker pressed on, his speech took on a more philosophical tone. “This is not a political battle; this is a fight for our very soul,” he proclaimed. The line echoed his frequent calls for unity and a higher moral ground in politics, urging lawmakers to look beyond party lines and focus on the people they serve.
In the moments that followed, Booker’s speech invited debate from the floor. Several Republican senators pushed back against his characterization of the
Trump administration’s policies. Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) was quick to challenge him, arguing, “The president’s policies have lifted millions out of poverty and given America’s workers unprecedented growth in wages.” Booker responded with calm and clarity, reiterating his belief that the administration’s economic policies disproportionately benefited the wealthiest Americans.
“The question we must ask ourselves,” Booker replied, “is who benefits when we give more tax cuts to the richest among us? Who benefits when we strip away protections from the most vulnerable— those who have given everything to this country yet receive so little in return?” His response wasn’t just a rebuttal; it was a challenge to the logic underpinning the Republican Party’s economic policies. Booker’s speech also drew reactions from his colleagues. Former Vice President Kamala Harris, a close ally, voiced her support on X, commending his courage and message. "The true measure of a leader is not based on who you beat down but on who you lift up," Harris wrote. "For over 24 hours, my friend @ CoryBooker stood on the Senate floor and lifted up the voices of Americans harmed by the current administration. We must continue to fight for the best of who we are as Americans.”
But not all responses were favorable. Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) accused Booker of “political grandstanding,” suggesting that his speech was more about personal ambition than genuine concern for the American people. “This is just another example of a politician using a crisis to make a name for himself,” Hawley remarked. Booker, however, remained unfazed, pressing on with the conviction that he was speaking not just for himself but for millions of Americans whose voices often go unheard.
His rhetoric was carefully crafted to appeal to both the moral sensibilities of voters and the pragmatic concerns of policymakers. He painted a vivid picture of an America where values like justice, fairness, and compassion were being sidelined in favor of short-term political victories and corporate interests. "This is not just a policy dispute," Booker declared, his voice growing more resolute. "This is a fight for the soul of this nation. Are we truly a country that values
fairness? Do we care for the poor, the sick, and the struggling? Or do we turn a blind eye to those who need us most?”
Throughout the speech, Booker cited key statistics underscoring the severity of the issues at hand. He pointed to the widening wealth gap, with the top 1% of earners controlling a larger share of wealth than the bottom 90%. “This is not the America we should want,” he said. “It’s not the America our forefathers fought for.” He also reminded us of fellow Congressman the late Representative John Lewis who told him, “Go out and cause some good trouble and redeem the soul of the country.“
By the speech’s conclusion, Booker had captured national attention. While some on the right dismissed it as political theater, many progressives and moderate Democrats saw it as a necessary call to action against what they viewed as a regressive political tide.
As the final moments approached, Booker’s words carried a sense of moral urgency. He reminded his colleagues— and the American people—that the decisions made in Washington would shape the country for generations. “What kind of nation do we want to leave behind?”
Booker asked in closing. “One that prioritizes the wealthy and powerful? Or one that stands up for the people, for the common good?”
The reverberations of Booker’s 25-hour speech may be felt for years to come if it galvanizes the Democratic base. More than a footnote in Senate history, it stands as a defining moment in the ongoing struggle to shape the future of American politics.
A History of Defining Moments
Booker’s marathon speech is just the latest in a career marked by headline-making moments. Over the years, he has solidified his place as one of the Senate’s most prominent progressive voices. Some of his most notable moments include:
• His 2020 Presidential Run: Booker entered the crowded Democratic primary with a message of unity and love, emphasizing justice and economic fairness. Though he ultimately dropped out before the Iowa caucuses, his campaign underscored his commitment to criminal justice reform, gun control, and expanding economic opportunity.
• His Role in the Kavanaugh Hearings:
Booker made headlines during the confirmation hearings of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, declaring it a moment of “moral duty” as he released confidential documents related to Kavanaugh’s judicial record.
• Leading Criminal Justice Reform: As one of the architects of the First Step Act, Booker worked across the aisle to push for sentencing reforms, reducing mandatory minimums and expanding rehabilitative opportunities for incarcerated individuals.
• Advocacy for Reproductive Rights: A staunch defender of women’s rights, Booker has been at the forefront of legislative battles to protect access to abortion and contraception.
• Authorship and Thought Leadership: Booker has also made his mark through writing. His book United: Thoughts on Finding Common Ground and Advancing the Common Good explores his leadership philosophy and vision for a more just America.
Booker’s Stand in Historical Context Booker’s marathon speech follows a long tradition of political leaders using extended floor speeches to make bold
statements. His stand echoes past senators who sought to shape history with their words:
• Strom Thurmond (1957) – The Filibuster Against Civil Rights: Thurmond, a Democrat-turned-Republican, spoke for 24 hours and 18 minutes in opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1957. Though his stance ultimately failed, it cemented his legacy as a staunch segregationist.
• Bernie Sanders (2010) – The “Filibernie” Against Tax Cuts: Sanders spoke for over eight hours against tax cuts for the wealthy, a move that helped build his progressive following and set the stage for his later presidential campaigns.
• Wendy Davis (2013) – The 13-Hour Filibuster for Reproductive Rights: Texas State Senator Davis’ speech against restrictive abortion laws turned her into a Democratic hero, though she later lost her bid for Texas governor.
• Rand Paul (2013) – The Drone Filibuster: Paul’s nearly 13-hour speech against drone strikes on American citizens earned him national attention among libertarian conservatives and helped define his political brand.
u Continue on Page 12
Cover Story
Of these figures, only Sanders successfully translated his speech into a broader political movement, later mounting two serious presidential campaigns. While Davis and Paul gained national recognition, they struggled to win higher office. Booker’s future remains uncertain, but his speech has already reignited conversations about Democratic leadership and the party’s direction.
The Political Impact: Is This What Democrats Needed?
A 2025 Pew Research Center poll shows that Democratic voters have grown increasingly disillusioned following the 2024 election, with approval ratings for party leadership dropping by 12%. Many progressives have been calling for bolder action to counter Republican policies, and Booker’s dramatic speech may signal a renewed energy within the party.
David Axelrod, a former Obama advisor, noted in a CNN panel discussion, “This is exactly the kind of political moment that can redefine a leader. Whether Booker can sustain this momentum is another question.”
Meanwhile, conservative commentator Ben Shapiro dismissed the speech, stating on his podcast, “Booker just wasted 25 hours grandstanding when he could
Continued from Page 11
have been actually legislating.”
A New Generation of Black Political Leadership?
Booker’s speech, which resonated deeply with progressive leaders and voters alike, has ignited discussions about his emerging role in Black political leadership. Figures like Barack Obama and John Lewis set a formidable precedent for principled, transformative leadership. However, Booker finds himself among a dynamic new wave of leaders, including Maryland Governor Wes Moore, House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, and Georgia Senator Raphael Warnock— each bringing a unique perspective and commitment to addressing contemporary issues.
Booker’s blend of moral conviction, policy-driven activism, and charismatic public engagement distinguishes him as a significant figure in this new era. His ability to articulate a vision that resonates with America’s evolving demographics positions him as a bridge between civil rights-era activism and today’s progressive movements.
For the Democratic Party, cultivating emerging leaders like Booker is crucial. Political relevance requires continuous renewal, ensuring that leadership reflects
the evolving needs of society. Leaders like Booker not only attract new voters but also invigorate the party’s base by connecting traditional values of justice and equity with innovative solutions to modern challenges—including systemic racism, economic disparity, climate change, and healthcare reform. Moreover, party unity is essential for electoral success. Democrats must balance appealing to a diverse electorate with maintaining a platform rooted in core values. Embracing emerging leaders like Booker allows the party to present a united front, bridging generational divides while addressing the issues most pressing to today’s voters. This unity fosters a stronger coalition, enabling Democrats to effectively challenge their opponents while staying true to their foundational principles.
A unified Democratic Party can maximize outreach, leverage resources, and coordinate efforts at all levels—from local elections to national campaigns.
A well-aligned strategy leads to a clearer, more cohesive message that resonates with a broader audience, increasing voter engagement and boosting electoral prospects.
As the Democratic Party navigates the complexities of modern politics, sup-
porting leaders like Cory Booker is not just beneficial—it’s essential. The party’s future depends on blending experience with fresh ideas, ensuring that rising stars are uplifted to meet the moment.
What Comes Next?
Booker’s marathon speech may be remembered as a singular act of political endurance, but its implications stretch far beyond the Senate floor. His record-breaking stand raises an essential question: Is he positioning himself as the next great Black leader in American politics? And if so, how will his vision shape the future of the Democratic Party and the nation?
What we do know is that the Senator ended on this final note: “Let’s get into some good trouble, My friend Madame President, I yield the floor.” Only time will tell, but in a moment when leadership is needed most, Cory Booker has made it clear—he is ready to answer the call.
CNW Staff Report
Lollapalooza Back in Chicago
After selling out of 4-Day Tickets in less than an hour, Lollapalooza has revealed the Lineup By Day for its 2025 edition and 1-Day General Admission, GA+, VIP and Platinum Tickets, along with 2-Day Tickets, are on sale now at www.lollapalooza.com.
Vee L. Harrison Contributing Writer
Deondre’ Rutues: West Side Renaissance Man
Community engagement specialist and research scholar
Dr. Deondré Rutues planted seeds on the West Side over a decade ago. Now, he’s watching them grow.
Rutues, 38, is a longtime West Side resident and has served as District Councilman for the 15th Police District since 2023. He has worked for several Fortune 500 companies, the Cook County Sheriff’s Office, and as an educator for Chicago Public Schools. Currently, he leads police districts 11, 15, and 25 as a Community Engagement Specialist for New York University’s Policing Project. He also served as Finance Chair of the Bobby E. Wright Behavioral Health Center and sits on multiple boards, including the Northwest Austin Council and Chicago’s Institute of Psychologists. A dedicated advocate for social justice, Rutues organizes with West Side Rising and Black Workers Matter.
Last month, he announced the opening of his own community center, the Rutues Center for Business and People Development, located at 5044 W. Madison.
“The location is intentional,” said Rutues. “It’s really bad over there in that area, and I’m looking to build it up.”
This development marks nearly 20 years since Rutues began grassroots organizing and community building on the West Side, specifically in the Austin neighborhood where he grew up. His vision has always been to create a thriving Austin for its residents.
In July 2023, Rutues earned his doctorate in Business Psychology from the Chicago School of Professional Psychology, giving him the credentials to work within organizations and improve productivity and efficiency through psychological expertise.
“It’s a very unique skill set. I’m looking forward to using it in the community and in all the work I do,” he said.
Before earning his doctorate, Rutues entered Chicago’s political scene as a candidate for the 37th Ward aldermanic race in 2019, ultimately losing to longtime Alderman Emma Mitts.
He recalled a pivotal moment during his campaign while collecting signatures to get on the ballot. An older man told him seeking change in Austin was a waste of time.
“I would never make another young person from the West Side feel the way that man made me feel that day,” Rutues said. But politics was just one part of Rutues’ impact. His career has been deeply rooted in community activism, leading multiple development projects, youth-serving initiatives, and public policy discussions. What sets Rutues apart, many say, is that his political and educational journey remained on the West Side—along with his home. Despite the lack of resources, the
piles of trash blowing between blocks, and the looming 290 Expressway, leaving was never in his plans. He has no interest in moving to a suburb or another part of the city. Only extreme circumstances—such as seeking better services for his autistic daughter—would make him consider relocating.
“I think it was the rapper Lady of Rage who coined the term ‘Re-enterfication,’” he said. “She talked about the need for us to become educated in the communities we’re from. A lot of times, you’ll see brothers like myself get highly educated, and we take our talents to build other communities instead of our own.”
Rutues’ journey on the West Side began nearly 30 years ago, when he and his twin brother, Dionté, were relocated from the South Side. Their birth mother decided she was not fit to raise them, setting the stage for a life defined by resilience, commitment, and the pursuit of change.
“We were actually from 119th and Stewart,” Rutues said. “Our mom had us at 17 and had to deal with whatever she was going through—family not supporting her, our father deserting her, and not really having the stability to give us a good life at the time.”
Rutues and his brother were taken in by Annie Jones, the mother of a man their mother was dating.
“She told my mom that she would take care of my brother and me for as long as she needed to get herself together,” Rutues said. “So, our story starts there.”
He remembers spending most of his childhood with Annie Jones and her family. Around third grade, when he was eight years old, he and his brother moved to the West Side. Feeling abandoned by his mother—and by the father who had abandoned her—left Rutues angry. He sought out relationships with numerous women, trying to fill the emptiness inside.
However, growing up on the West Side also exposed him to the pain of broken policies, generational trauma, family abandonment, and cultural failures. He was part of Austin’s history in the 1990s, attending local schools like Douglass Jr. High. Being a fraternal twin also put him under intense peer scrutiny, especially regarding his metrosexual style during his teenage years, which sparked rumors about his sexuality.
“This was around the time B2K was out, and my peers called me ‘Dre-Bug.’ I had the curls, I used to throw the contacts in, I used to do my nails with clear polish," Rutues said. "People talking about me really started to get to me.”
Childhood abuse left Rutues more vulnerable and traumatized to their bullying, leading to depressive episodes in which he contemplated suicide. And, as a coping tool to the emptiness he felt growing up
without either of his birth parents, Rutues began using sex to fill the void.
But as the years passed, Rutues made a conscious effort to seek out the wisdom of those he calls his “elders.” In his thirties, he realized that to truly understand the history of the West Side—the stories that came before him—he needed to sit with those who had lived it and could offer guidance. As time went on, he noticed that fewer and fewer elders remained. This awareness fueled his commitment to mentorship and leadership development, ensuring that the
next generation could continue the fight for progress. He credits his own growth to the lessons passed down from figures like Congressman Davis and Bobby E. Wright, two longtime West Siders whose work left a lasting impact.
Rutues knows his neighborhood doesn’t always make things easy—but he remains devoted to it.
“I made the pledge that I would never leave where I’m from because there’s work to be done here. As long as my skill set allows me to do so, I will always remain.”
THE BOOK OF DAVID
The Chaos in Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson’s Failure to Lead
Onthe evening of Friday, March 28, as unseasonably warm temperatures enveloped Chicago, a familiar and troubling pattern emerged. Approximately 300 young people swarmed Streeterville, unleashing chaos that has become emblematic of Chicago’s summer unrest. They vandalized property, jumped on vehicles, looted a 7-Eleven, and, in a tragic escalation, a 15-year-old boy was shot. Outnumbered five to one, the 60 police officers on-site struggled to maintain order.
This incident foreshadows the violence looming over Summer 2025 and underscores a leadership crisis at the highest levels of municipal governance. At the center of this failure stands Mayor Brandon Johnson, whose response was a predictable mix of platitudes and mis-
placed blame. While condemning the "antisocial behavior," he simultaneously attributed the chaos to a lack of recreational activities and employment opportunities for the youth.
This deflection is both disingenuous and dangerous. A well-functioning society operates on the premise that individuals, regardless of socio-economic background, are accountable for their actions. The absence of extracurricular activities or employment does not absolve individuals from meeting basic standards of public decorum. Mayor Johnson’s reluctance to acknowledge this principle signals either an alarming ideological blindness or an unwillingness to confront the crisis head-on.
Chicago, once a beacon of prosperity, is now hostage to lawlessness. This permissive approach to governance does not foster progress; it accelerates decline. When
leadership fails to draw clear distinctions between advocacy for marginalized communities and outright capitulation to disorder, the very people it purports to protect are ultimately harmed the most.
The mayor's apparent strategy—deflect, excuse, and enable—alienates law-abiding citizens across all demographics. Black Chicagoans do not uniformly support policies that enable disorder. Law-abiding Black residents suffer as much, if not more, from the city’s descent into chaos. Their neighborhoods bear the brunt of failing public safety policies, their businesses are looted, and their sense of security is eroded. Meanwhile, non-Black residents, witnessing the mayor’s abdication of responsibility, grow increasingly disillusioned with the city’s trajectory.
True leadership demands the fortitude to uphold civic order, even in the face of
ideological opposition. Mayor Johnson’s refusal to enforce consequences for violent and destructive behavior does not uplift marginalized communities; it condemns them to a cycle of instability and decline. His approach is not just a failure of policy—it is a failure of principle. Chicago does not need another summer of unrestrained violence. It needs decisive leadership willing to prioritize public safety over political expediency. If Mayor Johnson is either too inept or too ideologically rigid to recognize this fundamental reality, he should resign immediately. Chicago deserves a leader who governs for all, not one who enables disorder under the guise of misguided empathy.
The Hidden Toxins in Your Signature Scent
Theallure of a signature scent is undeniable— sandalwood on skin, citrus over musk, the rush of identity in a single spritz. Fragrance has always felt like magic. But behind the olfactory romance lies a sobering truth: many perfumes and colognes are chemical cocktails containing substances linked to serious health concerns.
Sales of body sprays alone surged 94% last year, according to 2024 data from Circana, making fragrance the fastest-growing sector in the beauty industry. But as demand rises, so do questions about what we’re actually putting on— and absorbing into—our bodies.
Researchers have long flagged phthalates, synthetic chemicals often used in plastics, as a red flag. In fragrances, phthalates act as solvents and stabilizers, helping scents cling to skin and last longer. But studies link them to endocrine disruption, meaning they interfere with hormones that regulate everything from reproduction to brain development. One 2021 review found strong evidence linking prenatal exposure to testicular malformation, reduced sperm quality, and even testicular cancer. And phthalates are just the start. Parabens and phenols, also common in
fragrances, have been tied to infertility and hormone-related cancers. The trouble is, you’d be hard-pressed to find these listed clearly on product labels.
Thanks to trade secret protections, companies often group them under vague terms like “fragrance” or “parfum.”
“It’s what you’re selling a lot of the time, so you don’t want to disclose what’s in it,” said Julia Varshavsky, a public health researcher at Northeastern University.
For those looking to reduce exposure, experts recommend a few strategies: Seek out products labeled “phthalate-free,” and use tools like the Environmental Working Group’s Healthy Living app to vet specific brands. Avoid layering multiple scented products, which compounds exposure. And when in doubt, less is more. There’s good news, though—phthalates
don’t accumulate in the body the way other toxins do. According to Dr. Stephanie Eick of Emory University, “Your body can clear them out in less than a day.” That means reducing exposure can have immediate benefits, especially for pregnant people and children—those most vulnerable to these chemicals.
Laura Miller Managing Editor
While the Getting’s Good When Is It Time to Delete the Dating App?
Online dating has reshaped the way we connect, making it easier to meet people while simultaneously complicating the process of exclusivity. But when do you take the plunge and delete the app?
Picture this: Date 1—the chemistry is electric. They have their head on straight, they seem to have done the work, and they are FINE. Date 2—you’re completing each other’s sentences, laughing at the same ridiculous things, and—without even meaning to—you’re making plans for weeks ahead. You found this person on the app, but they’re so great that it feels like the universe just opened up and dropped them in your lap. By Date 3, the attraction is hedonistic, the conversations are mind-melding, and future plans are solidifying. You both acknowledge how well it’s going. So, is it time to update your app status?
For some, the choice is instantaneous. Hayes believes it only takes one: "It would only take one for me." In contrast, Swan suggests a more measured approach: "I would say 3-4 [dates], and a discussion about exclusivity needs to be had." This echoes a common sen-
timent—while excitement may be high early on, ensuring both parties are on the same page is key before making any definitive moves.
Johnson shares a personal experience that illustrates the internal conflict many face. "With my man now, between our second and third date, he told me I’m getting all his attention and ain’t nobody else. So... I skedaddled off the app and told the other lurking losers to beat it!" She goes on to reveal that even before his declaration, she felt drawn to him and hesitant to entertain others. "The day before our second date, I had a date with another man. I didn’t want to go... but my girl encouraged me. I wish I’d followed my first mind. It was terrible."
On the other end of the spectrum, Burries takes a staunch stance, declaring, "I don't believe in exclusively dating, so I would drop the app after the engagement." His viewpoint underscores the evolving nature of modern dating, where some feel exclusivity only matters when long-term commitment is imminent.
Then there are those, like Keller-Houston, who have opted out of dating altogether. "I’ve given up on online
Scent has always been about more than smell—it’s memory, desire, ritual. But we can hold both things at once: the beauty and the burden. Knowing what’s in our products doesn’t ruin the experience. It just makes it real. And that’s the kind of honesty we owe ourselves.
dating and, for that matter, dating as a whole. I'll die alone—if I’m lucky, with a cat or dog." When prompted further, he added that the online dating pool has become oversaturated with disingenuous intentions, making genuine connections feel out of reach.
For many, deleting the app is tied to an agreement— either spoken or unspoken—between two people who have decided to explore something meaningful together. As Blair puts it, "I don't delete the app unless we're exclusively dating." That decision is often an indicator of growing investment in a relationship and a willingness to close the door to other possibilities. Ultimately, the right time to delete the app is a personal decision, influenced by emotional readiness, communication, and mutual understanding. Whether it’s after the first date, a heartfelt conversation, or an engagement ring, the moment of commitment varies from person to person. So while the getting is good, the real question remains: Are you ready to take that step, or is there still more swiping to be done?
The CTU Contract: More of the Same
Ifthere’s any good news in the new Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) contract, it’s that despite intense political pressure, CPS CEO Pedro Martinez held the line on four key issues: modest pay raises, limiting staff increases, protecting instructional time, and maintaining the current evaluation system.
The bad news? The contract, the fifth biggest issue, will cost taxpayers $1.5 billion while failing to remove CTU-imposed barriers to school improvement or expand public school options for parents.
The Five Biggest Issues
1. The Contract’s Cost
CTU’s initial demands would have cost $10 billion over four years. The final agreement, which mirrors Martinez’s contract offer from six months ago, will cost $1.5 billion— matching the previous record-setting CTU contract. And like that contract, it includes no concessions from the CTU.
2. Pay Raises
CTU demanded a 9% salary increase. In the end, they accepted the 4% first-year and 5% second-year increases that CPS original-
ly offered, with additional raises for veteran teachers. However, these increases stack on top of “step-and-lane” raises, meaning most teachers will see their annual pay increases nearly double.
3. Staff Increases
CTU wanted 13,900 new staff members; CPS sought to maintain current staffing levels. The final contract adds 800–900 additional staff in targeted areas—on top of the 9,000+ full-time positions added since 2019. Today, CPS has one staff member for every 7.6 students.
4. Instructional Time
CTU pushed for more prep time at the expense of instructional time. CPS resisted, but for the second straight contract, the district will spend $1.5 billion without adding a single minute of extra instructional time— even though increasing instructional time is one of the most effective ways to boost student performance.
5. Teacher Evaluations
CPS refused to weaken teacher evaluations, but the current system is already toothless. There’s no link between teacher evaluations and student performance, nor are there con-
sequences for poor evaluations or even misconduct.
A $1.5 Billion Status Quo Agreement
This contract does nothing to halt CPS’s retreat from high standards and accountability, nor does it remove CTU contract restrictions that prevent Local School Councils and principals from making meaningful decisions about their schools. It also further cements the CTU’s efforts to eliminate public school alternatives, such as charter and magnet schools.
The Continued Abandonment of Standards and Accountability
CPS is moving toward a “soft” scoring and assessment system, shifting focus from student achievement to vague measures of social and emotional development. This is the institutional equivalent of grade inflation— ensuring students and schools look better on paper, regardless of actual learning outcomes. In December 2023, the mayor-appointed school board voted to end school rankings based on performance. Though CPS will continue reporting standardized test results due to state requirements, these results will no longer be used to assess schools internally. Even teacher evaluations have been gutted. In 2021, despite plummeting student test scores, CTU walkouts, and forced remote learning, 98% of CPS teachers were rated “excellent” or “proficient”—up from 91.4% in 2019 and 85.6% in 2018. This glaring disconnect between teacher evaluations and student performance undermines accountability.
CTU’s Barriers to Improving Neighborhood Schools
The new CTU contract expands its Sustainable Community Schools model while pushing a new school funding formula based on “need” rather than enrollment. In reality, this is a smokescreen to protect union jobs at severely under-enrolled schools.
For example, Manley High School has a capacity for over 1,000 students but enrolls just 78—spending $45,000 per student. Douglas High School has a capacity of 900 but enrolls just 35—spending $68,000 per student. By contrast, fully enrolled Northside College Prep spends just over $16,000 per student.
CPS has 163 schools operating at less than half capacity—one-third of all CPS buildings. At least 20 schools operate at less than 25% capacity, yet many fail to educate the students who remain. This contract and funding formula further entrench obstacles to closing or consolidating underused schools, even when there is community consensus.
el—set to expand from 20 to 70 schools under the new contract—has been a disaster. Illinois State Board of Education data shows that these schools perform worse than both selective-enrollment and traditional public schools by almost every measure.
CTU’s
Efforts to Eliminate Even Public School Choice
CTU was instrumental in killing the Invest in Kids tax-credit scholarship program. When it ended, at least 15,000 students lost scholarships, and several private schools closed permanently. But CTU isn’t stopping there—it’s working to eliminate charter and magnet schools as well. The last two CTU contracts imposed a moratorium on charter school growth and capped enrollment at 101% of 2019–2020 levels. The new contract continues this cap through 2027–2028. CTU falsely claims public charter schools drain funding from traditional public schools. In reality, charter schools receive $8,600 less per student than the district average. Charter schools serve over 54,000 students, 98% of whom are Black and Latino. Charters make up 10% of CPS elementary students and 25% of high schoolers. Recent research confirms charters outperforming traditional public schools. A 2023 Stanford CREDO study found that charter students achieve much stronger academic gains, particularly among disadvantaged children.
A System Rigged Against Families Seeking Better Schools
For many low-income Black and Latino families, charter schools, magnet schools, and private-school scholarships are the only alternatives to failing neighborhood schools. Blocking these options perpetuates systemic inequality.
CTU’s iron grip on CPS has made it nearly impossible for Local School Councils or principals to adopt better models. Schools lack control over their budgets, staffing, and instructional time. The system is designed to protect CTU jobs—not educate children. CEO Martinez’s last-minute stand against CTU’s worst demands was commendable. But let’s not be fooled: This contract is another victory for the status quo. It further entrenches CTU’s dominance, it weakens school accountability, and it denies parents the right to choose better schools for their children.
And taxpayers? They’re stuck with a $1.5 billion bill to pay for it all.
Steak with Smashed Cucumber Salad
It’s
not quite spring, but we can feel it coming. So, if we want to skip ahead to lift our spirits and help us power through, so be it. A wonderfully satisfying meal helps. But let’s keep it real—it’s still winter in Chicago, even if the weather is unpredictable. So, what’s better than a summer-inspired meal with hearty winter grit? A juicy steak paired with a refreshing cucumber salad tossed in a citrusy, salty dressing. Add a plump baked potato or your favorite serving of French fries for a simple yet satisfying dinner. It will fill you up and stick to your ribs. Though the recipe calls for cooking the steak in a cast-iron skillet, you can grill it if you prefer.
Try this 25-minute meal for dinner.
For a delicious study in contrasts, pair juicy, hot steak with a cool, crunchy cucumber salad. Smashing the cucumbers creates craggy edges—perfect for catching the savory sesame dressing.
Ingredients
1 1/2 lb. skirt steak, cut crosswise into 4 pieces
Kosher salt and pepper
1 tsp. olive oil
1 lb. Persian cucumbers, halved lengthwise
2 Tbsp. sesame oil
1 Tbsp. sesame seeds
1 Tbsp. reduced-sodium soy sauce
1/2 Tbsp. fresh lemon juice
1 tsp. grated peeled fresh ginger
1/2 tsp. honey
1/3 cup cilantro, roughly chopped Chili crisp, for serving
Instructions
Step 4. Rinse the cucumbers in a colander, then shake off as much water as possible. Transfer them to the bowl with the dressing and toss to combine. Add cilantro and toss again. Serve alongside the steak and drizzle with chili crisp, if desired.
Step 1. Heat a large cast-iron skillet over medium-high heat. Season the steak with 1/2 teaspoon each of salt and pepper. Add oil to the skillet, then cook the steak to your desired doneness—about 2 to 3 minutes per side for medium-rare, depending on thickness. Transfer to a cutting board and let it rest for at least 5 minutes before slicing against the grain.
Step 2. Using the side of a chef’s knife, lightly smash the cucumbers to crush them, then cut each half into 4 to 6 chunks. Transfer the cucumbers to a medium bowl and toss with 2 teaspoons of salt. Let sit for 10 minutes.
Step 3. Meanwhile, in a large bowl, whisk together the sesame oil, sesame seeds, soy sauce, lemon juice, ginger, and honey.
Pro Tip: Steer clear of a watery salad by tossing the cucumbers with salt first to draw out moisture, then rinsing them before adding to the dressing.
Nutritional Information (per serving):
About 444 calories, 33 g fat (10 g saturated), 118 mg cholesterol, 708 mg sodium, 6 g carbohydrate, 1 g fiber, 2.5 g sugar (0.5 g added sugar), 33 g protein
Own Your Look Sting Like a Bee, Float Like a Butterfly
Who’s your favorite fashion icon? My favorites were all uniquely expressed through their style, which spoke volumes about their personalities. Each had a signature look that was identifiable and effortlessly fabulous. But not everyone can wear something the same way. Allow yourself to be inspired by others, but own what you wear—don’t let it wear you.
It takes some of us longer to find our style, but I’ve noticed that those who do have their own way of stinging like a bee and floating like a butterfly. I love the lines, colors, shapes, and textures of fabrics and designs. I see a dress as a fine piece of art, an extension of myself. I’m drawn to the dynamism of simplicity—especially in a dress. I prefer pieces that can be styled in a thousand different ways just by changing accessories, whether dressing them up or down. One might say I’m a fan of Chanel’s little black dress.
What’s your sweet spot? What moves, touches, and inspires you in fashion?
Ready to Go
If you’re the girl everyone wants at their party, your invitations are piling up. You need that special dress that will glide you effortlessly from one event to the next. Switch things up with a Norma Kamali dress, available in a gorgeous palette of colors, perfect for any occasion. Kamali’s marigold satin gown is flawless for transitioning into summer. Pair it with Manolo Blahnik’s Shutta pumps—a stylish alternative to the classic heeled sandal or office pump, perfect for an evening look.
Style Statement
Finding statement fashion at an approachable price can be challenging, but this week’s picks deliver. Lean into The Row's minimalist aesthetic with the Sock ballet flats. Crafted in Italy from semi-sheer black mesh, this barely-there pair features a rounded toe and a tonal leather sole. Style yours with new-season ready-to-wear from the label.
• Upper: fabric
• Toe shape: round toe
• Sole: leather insole and sole
• Lining: fabric
• Made in Italy
• Designer color name: Black
Signature Pieces
You’re set and ready to go—now it’s time for the finishing touches. Think belts, handbags, jewelry, hats, scarves, shawls, sunglasses, and eyeglasses. Even your lipstick color can be a signature statement. These final details accentuate and transform your look, making or breaking an outfit. But the ultimate exclamation mark? Your attitude. The swag you bring to the room is what truly completes your look.
