ROTARY CLUB OF MANILA JOURNALISM AWARDS
2006 National Newspaper of the Year 2011 National Newspaper of the Year 2013 Business Newspaper of the Year 2017 Business Newspaper of the Year 2019 Business Newspaper of the Year
BusinessMirror A broader look at today’s business
EJAP JOURNALISM AWARDS
BUSINESS NEWS SOURCE OF THE YEAR (2017, 2018)
DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
2018 BANTOG MEDIA AWARDS PHILIPPINE STATISTICS AUTHORITY
DATA CHAMPION
‘SUSTAINED PRESSURE, SUSTAINED RESISTANCE’ www.businessmirror.com.ph
n
Saturday, December 14, 2019 Vol. 15 No. 65
P25.00 nationwide | 16 pages | 7 DAYS A WEEK
China ramps up pressure ahead of Taiwan’s January 11 presidential polls
ANDREW YANG, secretary-general of Taiwan’s private think tank Chinese Council of Advanced Policy Studies
C
CHEN MING-CHI, deputy minister of the Mainland Affairs Council
By Rene Acosta
HINA has stepped up its pressure on Taiwan in the run-up to Taipei’s presidential elections next month where President Tsai Ing-wen is running for her second and last term on a strong anti-Beijing stance, a campaign platform that first catapulted her to office in 2016.
While Beijing constantly flexes its muscles on its tiny islandneighbor that it considers a “renegade province,” Taipei, under Tsai’s leadership, has however, learned to shake it off by reinforcing her nation’s political, economic and security fundamentals.
Provocations, attacks, fake news
CHINA’S pressure—as Taipei sees it—comes in many forms. Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Deputy Minister Chen Ming-chi and other Taiwanese officials, said these in-
clude provocations, cyber attacks and even the deliberate feeding of information, or fake news, to Taiwan residents. “Despite [the fact] that we have worked very hard to continue our moderate stance towards China, China has become more provocative these days,” Chen told journalists who visited Taiwan last week. “But Taiwan will not be kowtowing [to China] and [its] Communist Party.” Chen, whose office is tasked with the planning, development and implementation of Taipei’s
policies toward Beijing, said the island values democracy, human rights, freedom of speech and rule of law. And these very same principles, he said, are what differentiate it from China. “We want to maintain our democratic way of living,” Chen said.
One country, two systems
TAIWANESE officials see Beijing’s increased pressure as part of the communist party’s effort to influence the results of the presidential elections against Tsai, and in favor of the other candidate who will toe and
advance China’s line of reunification. China regards Taiwan as a wayward province that should be reunited—even by using force— with the mainland. Tsai, who is running for reelection under the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), is favored by more than 50 percent of Taiwanese voters against other candidates, including from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), who barely have to breach even a 10-percent acceptance, if Taiwan’s latest survey were to be believed. Continued on a2
Meet the scholar who diagnosed ‘surveillance capitalism’
A
By Frank Bajak | AP Technology Writer
YEAR ago, Shoshana Zuboff dropped an intellectual bomb on the technology industry. She hasn’t stood still since. In a 700-page book, the Harvard scholar skewered tech giants like Facebook and Google with a damning phrase: “surveillance capitalism.” The unflattering term evokes how these companies vacuum up the details of our lives, make billions from that data and use what they’ve learned to glue our attention more firmly to their platforms. A best seller in Canada and Britain, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism was published in the US in January, is being translated into 17 languages and has inspired two small theater productions. Zuboff, meanwhile, has been counseling politicians, criss-crossing the Atlantic for public forums from Los Angeles to Rome and hitting the podcast circuit. She offered input on several pending US privacy bills and
wrote a 34-page policy paper for the House Judiciary Committee, whose antitrust panel is studying Big Tech’s potential abuse of its market dominance. Zuboff has “put the language of economics around the experience that we all know we’re having,” says Beeban Kidron, a film director and UK House of Lords member who spearheaded childprotection rules limiting how apps gather data and tempt kids to linger online. “She’s a rock star.” Early on, Zuboff realized researchers had missed the importance of the ambient data that digital services collect—where we use them, for how long, what we like, what we linger on and with whom we associate. They were calling it “digital exhaust.” But Zuboff saw that this data
PESO EXCHANGE RATES n US 50.7330
IN this March 27, 2019 photo, author Shoshana Zuboff speaks to a reporter in her home in Maine. Zuboff is the author of The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, a book about how tech companies collect and use personal data. AP/ROBERT F. BUKATY
wasn’t just an unexpected byproduct, says Chris Hoofnagle, a University of California-Berkeley privacy expert. “It is the product.” Tech industry allies denounce Zuboff’s thesis as conspiracyminded hyperbole. Consumers willingly trade their personal data for access to valuable services that don’t cost them a cent, they argue. Google and Facebook declined to discuss Zuboff or her book. But after more than a year of tech-related privacy scandals, malign election-interference and online platform-fueled extremism, investigations opened by state attorneys general and the US government’s first tentative steps toward reining in its technology titans, it’s become clear that Zuboff helped crystallize previously vague apprehensions about the tech industry. Zuboff’s indictment is straightforward: Tech companies suck up our data trails then use those insights to steer us toward commercial interactions, develop their next addictive apps and predict our future behavior—effectively molding individual behavior. Worse, she says, these invasive business practices are spreading. “By now this is a virus that has Continued on a2
n JAPAN 0.4641 n UK 66.8255 n HK 6.5018 n CHINA 7.2187 n SINGAPORE 37.4607 n AUSTRALIA 35.0464 n EU 56.4861 n SAUDI ARABIA 13.5285
Source: BSP (December 13, 2019 )