2012-2016 Work Sample Southern California Institute of Architecture Chi Hung Leung (626)620-3105 Brandon_Leung@Hotmail.com
2013 Summer Internship Olympic Pavilion Location: Los Angeles, CA Lights
OCDC Summer Internship May 2013 - Sep 2013
Recreational Area
I participated in drawing the details of THe Olympic Pavilion, in which it’s a compeition project. While I was in the office, I was also in charge of the producion of the physical model.
Stairs
N Plan + Section
Roof Plan and Floor Plan Structural Components
Elevation
Skin Xray Render
4 OCDC Summer Internship | Olympic Pavilion
10 5
2A Studio Fire Protection Water Reservoir Location: South Antelope Valley, CA Individual Project Instructor: Eric Kahn Sep - Dec 2012 If cube is 3D, knot is 2D, and Root is 1D, Knoop is a transitional transformation from volume to line. The figure is anexct which means two similar things separated by a slightly different dissimilitude from each other. All figure and roots are not the same in the knoop project. For example, there is an origin between knot and roots. Following the origin, there are two groups of similar roots. Even though they look the same, they have different amounts of arrayed branches.
2A Studio|Bridge to Nowhere Water Station
17
This project explores the integration between DIscrepancy and Dissimilitude. DIscrepancy refers to The state or quality of being discrepant; difference; inconsistency. It is also an instance of difference or inconsistency: There are certain discrepancies between the two versions of the story. On the other hand, dissimilitude has the similar meaning of disimilarity which means differences. It can also refer to a point of difference.
2A Studio | Fire Protection Water Reservoir
5
2B Studio Los Angeles Art Museum Location: Little Tokyo, Los Angeles, CA Individual Project Instructor: Jenny Wu Jan - Apr 2013 The primiary interest of this project is to create a continuous spatial experience that is composed by a folded circulating gesture. Through the explorations of parts-to-whole relationship, the museum is composed by five diffierent parts. The architectural form of this museum encourages people to enter the building through its tail, and it will lead people all the way to the top floor of the whole museum. The secondary circulation lead people from the undergraound level to converge with the main circulation in the lobby. The secondary emphasis of this project is to create an architectural from that emerges from the ground gradually. This is why the spatial sequence of the museum starts in the underground level, and ends in the air.
6 2B Studio | Los Angeles Art Museum
Building Parts Diagram
Part 1
Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Part 7
3A Studio Pier 26 Natatorium
Mechanical Spaces Diagram
Structure Diagram
LEVEL iii Matrix Diagram
LARGE POOL 15’ -3’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / COLD WATER / FRESH / LEISURE LARGE INDIVIDUAL POOLS 10’ DEPTH / EXTERIOR / WARM WATER / FRESH / LEISURE
LARGE POOL 3’ - 15’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / COLD WATER / FRESH / LEISURE
2 SMALL + 2 WADING POOLS 3” - 8’ / EXTERIOR / WARM WATER / FRESH / LEISURE
LEVEL ii
Location: Embarcadero, san francisco, CA
Matrix Diagram
LARGE POOL 15’ - 3’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / WARM WATER / FRESH / RECREATION
Primary A-Frame
LARGE SLIDE 6” DEPTH / EXTERIOR / WARM WATER / FRESH / RECREATION
Pump Station
LARGE POOL 3’ - 15’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / WARM WATER / FRESH / RECREATION
Tertiary Supportive One Way Frame
Group Project Instructor: Christopher Korner Sep - Dec 2013
MEDIUM POOL 3’ - 10’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / COLD WATER / FRESH / LEISURE
Secondary Supportive A-Frame
Structure Diagram
2 SMALL + 2 WADING POOLS 3” - 8’ / INTERIOR / COLD WATER / FRESH / LEISURE
MEDIUM POOL 10’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / COLD WATER / FRESH / FITNESS
LEVEL i Matrix Diagram
Cistern MEDIUM POOL 10’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / COLD WATER / FRESH / FITNESS
Swimming Pool Placement Diagram
Circulation Diagram
MEchanical Spaces Diagram
This project explores the relationship between structural morphology and overall building mass and organization in the design of a natatorium located on a pier in The Embarcadero in San Francisco. The proposal for this project is to create a multiplatform megastruture natatorium in order to form a modern, relaxing water pool experience while conserving the historic context of the surrounding environment. The inspiration is the Tokyo Bay Project by Kenzo Tange. Without altering the site, the natatorium is like a floating island that sits on top of the original pier columns so as to preserve the existing cultural context. The programs are located inside the giant A-frames with secondary structures supporting the pools. The beginning and the end of structure are composed by repeating A-frames structures. The middle section of the project consists a series of gathering pools in which the idea was from the gathering hot springs from nature. It also has water slides underneath the gathering pools, with several waterfalls coming off from different pools. B
Level 3 Circulation Level 2 Circulation Level 1 Circulation
Circulation Diagram
Program Diagram
Large Swimming Pools Medium and Small Swimming Pools
Program Diagram
C
A
B
A
C
A
A
3A Studio | Pier 26 Natatorium B
Third Level Floor Plan 1/32” scale
C
B
First Level Floor Plan 1/32” scale
C
7
3B Studio School of Music
A
Location: manhattan, new york Group Project Instructor: Darin Johnstone Jan - Apr 2014
120’
120’
108’
108’
95’
95’
83’
83’
69’
Morphology A: Single Curved Mass
For the concept of this music school project, we used two different morphologies to different the performance spaces with from the typical programs. We wanted to bring out the continuity and the dynamics aspect of the performance space in the music school. THerefore, the theater spaces are connected to each other continuously. The appearance of the external facade came from the internal floor plan datum and the levels of importance. The more important of the internal program is, the more coffers and windows would be attracted to it. Because the largest theater is located at the right half of the music school, The right half of the external facade expresses a very intensed characteristic. This is why the right half of the external facade are appeared to be more dramatic and denser than the left half of the facade. On the other hand, we also want to connect the internal public spaces with the site environment. This is why we chose the combination of windows and coffer so as to support our argument.
64’
Primary program is bounded by single curvature planes to generate a morphology of creased edges and curved surfaces.
50’
50’
45’
45’
32.5’
22’
14’
12.75’
A
Morphology B: Prismatic Shell
quadrilateral tesselations envelope the auxiliary program to create an exterior prismatic skin.
Morphology A+B: Nested
The negative void from the impacted morphologies enables access to light wells and spatial affects.
120’
108’
95’
83’
68’
Bound Theatres
55’
Program Massing
40’
27’
Academic
8 3B Studio | School of Music
Administrative
Acoustical
Circulation
Public
Section A-A @ 1/16" = 1'-0"
4A Studio City Operations Location: Downtown Los Angeles, CA Group Project Instructor: Alexis Rochas Sep - Dec 2014
One dimensional Zoning
Website: http://brandonleung.wix.com/studio4a Description: We looked at the downtown Los Angeles Zoning Map and discovered that it’s The existing zoning map of downtown Los Angeles is figural and each zone is well segregated from each other. There are four basic zoning which are residential zone, commercial zone, industrial zone, and green space. For instance, green space includes parks and public spaces while residential zone has residential houses, and apartments, etc. We have the idea that each city block even a single building has its own zoning. Through manipulating and redistributing the ratios between different zonings, each one square mile microzones will produce a variety of different results. We Also have the idea that the city won’t behave in a concentrated metropolis, but it could potentially be like a distributed metropolis, in which all of the one square mile microzone samples are all separated from each other.
Existing Zoning
New Zoning
Project Website Link
New Sampling Zoning Distributed Metropolis
Distributed Metropolis
4A Studio | City Operations
9
5A Studio San Paulo Museum of Art
Shape is... Adaptable It eliminates information and it is often at lowe resolution.
Graphic It avoids the rhetorical excess of geometric form or expressive mass, it exhibits the immediacy of the graphic
Location: Bela Vista, Brazil Individual Project Instructor: Elena Manferdini Sep - Dec 2015
Zaha hadid Building and Ground Relationship Diagram
Hans Hollein Building and Ground Relationship Diagram
Building To Ground relationship
Description: This project divides the site into two halves. One half is for the public to gather while another half of the site filters public circulation into the museum through the corridors between the sites. The public space is represented in black while the private space is represented in red. The site has a hierarchy between public-public and private-public area by raising up private-public area and leaving public area at the ground level. The project introduces cultural diversity by raising up the private-public spaces from the public spaces. The site has a thick ground to filter the public to enter to the building without moving through the building. It also has a big public space which has access to the building. After the public circulation being filtered into the building, the private circulation was drawn upward. Because the ground level promotes public circulation, its programs are also public too. As people moving upward, they will experience the spaces and the building differently because some are private dominant spaces and vice versa.
Translating SHape into Museum diagram
10 5A Studio | San Paulo Museum of Art
Floor Plan
Site Plan
2D Shape Diagrams
Section
3D Shape Diagrams Section
Elevation
Thesis Ambiguous Legibility
Industrial Residential Commercial
Location: Los Angeles, CA Thesis Individual Project Instructor: Marcelo Spina Jan - Apr 2016
Existing SIte Plan DIagram Concept Diagram
Section
Most projects are often categorized as different types of building typology and whether it’s a single or a multiple building project. The projects are very clear in a way that people can categorize them easily. Unlike the legible qualities as seen in OMA’s CCTV project nor ambiguity as found in Peter Eisenman’s Max Reinhardt Haus Project, the thesis seeks to create a state between legibility and the ambiguity within the high-rise, mid-rise, low-rise, single and multiple building typology. The work attempts to amplify the monolithic qualities of an architectural mass and create different degrees of ambiguity and legibility of architectural elements through a combination of ground to tower to bridge relationships.
Tower
Tower to Bar
Tower to Bar to Tower
High level Floor Plan
Tower to Bar to Tower to Bridge
12,000 sq ft per floor 1490 ft 150 Floors
Tower to Bar to Tower to Bridge to Tower
Final Massing
Conceptual Massing Diagram
FInal Physical Sectional Model
Elevation
Thesis | Ambiguous Legibility
11
Design Development
BAM
Final Booklet
B
Golkar
Architects Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar
Location: New York, CA
Go
music
TAUT
Permeable Roof 2' x 2' panel
Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City
2' x 2' panel 4" OC
PROJECTdescription
4A Seminar
Arc
Permeable Roof Radiant Floor
AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation
Primary Structure 24' steel pipe
The TAUT Institute of Music is a non-profit project. It contains 3 theaters for student and public use, and classes for up to 720 students. 56,236 SQ FT 11 Floors 3 Theaters 500 Seats 1A Construction Type A1, A3, B Occupancy Types
Concrete
structural floor
Brando Arnold Melody Paniz G
Secondary
6" x 6" steel member
Metal Decking
3" corrugated steel
Tertiary
3" x 3" steel member
I-beam
W18 x 119/W10 x 112
m
Panel
4' x 8' expanded mesh panel
Hanging Ceiling gypsum board
Group Project Instructor: Scott Uriu, Pavel Getov Sep - Dec 2014
musicTAUT is the new home of the NewYorkMusicInstitute. The NewYorkMusicInstitute is recognized around the world as the spearhead of acoustical academia, consistently ranking in the top 5 globally with their world-renown Master of Music (M.Mus) and Master of Arts in Pedagogy of Music Theory (MA.MusT). The new facility, a mere three blocks from their current home, will allow them to comfortably double the student body: three new theatres enable student performances to be kept in house, with the addition of 15 classrooms, 10 large practice rooms and 6 recording studios to facilitate the arts. These new spaces are also available for public use, to better integrate the school into its neighboorhood.The NewYorkMusicInstitute is pursuing LEED gold on the musicTaut project, as it is commited to bettering the world around them; here, music is taught.
Radiant Floor 4" OC
Catwalk 30" width
structural floor
Glass
double-glazed
Metal Decking
3" corrugated steel
BAM
Pipe Structure Panel Structure Expanded Mesh
$ $ $ $
Structural Steel Rolled Steel Rib
$ $ $
Facade
3,614 226,840 3,185,100 3,415,554
Golkar
Facade_Pipe Structure
Mullion
aluminum window frame
LAND COSTS Lot Size 10,800SF
25,607,736 1,743,588 27,351,324
Brandon Leung
$924 @ 27,714 ft
Shell_Concrete Floor
$120 @ 32,629 SF
SystemAssembly_Sprinklers
_Core
$3.50 @ 3,152 ft
$120 @ 95,012 SF
Hanging Ceiling
THe students are required to produce a 9’x9’ drawing by the end of the semester. The drawing needs to incorporate multiple systems such as ADA, egress, fire sprinklers, and hvac systems, etc.
Core Glazing Finishes
$100 @ 31,851 SF
$462 @ 3,774 ft
Shell_Shotcrete+GFRG
$172 @ 32,629 SF
SystemAssembly_HVAC
177'-4 3/4"
165'-6"
125'-6"
105'-6"
Pipe Structure Panel Structure Expanded Mesh
Facade_Pipe Structure
$1.91 @ 1892 ft
Shell_Concrete Floor
$120 @ 32,629 SF
SystemAssembly_Sprinklers
$3.50 @ 3,152 ft
$ $ $
25,607,736 1,743,588 27,351,324
Concrete Floor Shotcrete+GFRG
$ $ $
3,915,480 5,612,188 9,527,668
Facade_Expanded Mesh $100 @ 31,851 SF
3
53'-0" 2
Panel
4' x 8' expanded mesh panel
33'-0"
AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation
Tertiary
LOBBY
3" x 3" steel member
1
Secondary
6" x 6" steel member
Primary Structure 24' steel pipe
Waterproof Membrane 0.065" @ 500,000 ohms/ft²
Finish coat A.1.0 FIRSTfloor
gloss coat acrylic concrete sealer
Rigid Insulation
Extruded Polystyrene Foam
Shotcrete Grade1
Primary Steel Cage 10' OC
F
177'-4 3/4"
165'-6"
C
D
E
105'-6"
125'-6"
B
65'-6"
BAM Golkar
A
36'-6 3/4"
3
53'-0"
LOBBY
$/SF 560
SystemAssembly $ $ $
11,032 8,160 19,192
Terms 3.81% @ 15yr
Monthly Payment $548,775
Total $6,048,000
$6,048,000
SOFT COSTS Costs Shell Costs Land Costs
Comission 18% 18%
Total $9,888,484.88 $1,088,640.00
$10,977,124.88
CONTINGENCIES Contingencies Estimation Construction
Margin 5% 10%
Total $2,746,801.36 $5,493,602.71
$8,240,404.07
Interior+Finishes $ $ $ $
11,401,440 1,107,925 2,112,924 12,509,365
OVERALL PROJECT COST Category Land Cost Shell Cost Soft Cost Contingency
Total $6,048,000.00 $54,936,027.00 $10,977,124.88 $8,240,404.07
$80,201,555.95
SteelSystem_Rolled Steel Ribs
$462 @ 3,774 ft
Shell_Shotcrete+GFRG
$172 @ 32,629 SF
SystemAssembly_HVAC
$2 @ 4,080 ft
_Glazing
$65 @ 17,045 SF
54,936,027
LOAN COSTS Loan $80,201,555.95
Terms 3.81% @ 15yr
Monthly Payment $548,775
A.8.0 COSTanalysis
BAM Golkar
Architects
A.4.0 BIGch
Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar
music
TAUT
Catwalk
I-beam
AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation
Total $6,048,000.00 $54,936,027.00 $10,977,124.88 $8,240,404.07
$80,201,555.95
AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation
30" width
TAUT
Interior Finish GFRG
OVERALL PROJECT COST Category Land Cost Shell Cost Soft Cost Contingency
interior panel
Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar
Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City 33'-0"
RECORDING
RECORDING
CLASS ROOM
Total $2,746,801.36 $5,493,602.71
$8,240,404.07
Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City
GFRG
Architects
music 2
CONCERT HALL 303
AS 3040 Design D
CONTINGENCIES
Margin 5% 10%
LAND COSTS Lot Size 10,800SF
Shell
_Core
$
music Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City
Facade
3,614 226,840 3,185,100 3,415,554
SteelSystem
TOTAL SHELL COSTS
Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar
TAUT
$ $ $ $
Structural Steel Rolled Steel Rib
Core Glazing Finishes
Architects
MAIN THEATER
4' x 8' expanded mesh panel
Loan $80,201,555.95
$65 @ 17,045 SF
$120 @ 95,012 SF
Golkar
36'-6 3/4"
65'-6"
Panel Contingencies Estimation Construction
$21.40 @ 10,600 ft
BAM
A
Mullion
aluminum window frame
LOAN COSTS
_Glazing
$2 @ 4,080 ft
Facade_Panel Structure
B
double-glazed
$10,977,124.88
TOTAL SHELL COSTS
SteelSystem_Rolled Steel Ribs
Sprinklers HVAC
C
11,401,440 1,107,925 2,112,924 12,509,365
Housto Arts Sc
Glass
AS 3040 Fall 2014 $ 54,936,027 Design Documentation
Facade_Expanded Mesh
$924 @ 27,714 ft
D
$ $ $ $
Total $9,888,484.88 $1,088,640.00
3" x 3" steel member
Interior+Finishes
Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City
SteelSystem_Structural Steel
E
11,032 8,160 19,192
TAUT
Facade_Panel Structure $21.40 @ 10,600 ft
F
music $ $ $
SOFT COSTS
Comission 18% 18%
Tertiary
Shell
SystemAssembly
W18 x 119/W10 x 112
gypsum board
Secondary
Paniz Golkar Sprinklers HVAC
I-beam
Total $6,048,000
$6,048,000
6" x 6" steel member
Costs Shell Costs Land Costs
$ 3,915,480 $ 5,612,188 Melody Javaherian 9,527,668 $
SteelSystem_Structural Steel
$/SF
560 Primary Structure 24' steel pipe
SteelSystem
Architects
$1.91 @ 1892 ft
Concrete FloorKim Arnold Shotcrete+GFRG
Description:
TA
Concrete
A.0.0 COVERpage
F
G
177'-4 3/4"
125'-6"
B
C
D
E
165'-6"
105'-6"
65'-6"
THEATRE 902 CLASS ROOM
8TH FLOOR
CLASS ROOM
EL84'-0"
THEATRE 801
EL70'-0"
W18 x 119/W10 x 112
Concrete
4TH FLOOR
Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City
5TH FLOOR CONCERT HALL 303
structural floor
Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar
TAUT
7TH FLOOR
6TH FLOOR
4" OC
Golkar
music
EL97'-11"
EL56'-0"
BAM Architects
9TH FLOOR EL112'-0"
Radiant Floor
A
36'-6 3/4"
CLASS ROOM
AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation
Primary structure 24ӯ steel pipe
Secondary
6” x 6” steel member
Tertiary
3” x 3” steel member
Panel
4’ x 8’ perforated aluminum
Golkar
Architects Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar
music
TAUT
Radiant Floor 4” OC
Concrete
structural floor
Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City
Metal decking steel
EL42'-0"
BAM
AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation
I-beam Metal Decking
W18 x 119/W10 x 112
CLASS ROOM
3RD FLOOR
3" corrugated steel
EL 28'-0"
Hanging ceiling
CONCERT HALL 202
GFRG
Hanging Ceiling gypsum board
Glass
2ND FLOOR EL14'-0"
double-glazed
1
LOBBY
Mullion
aluminium window frame
STREET LEVEL EL 0’-0”
A.1.1 THIRDfloor
A.4.4 2DwallSECTION
CONCERT HALL 101
A.2.0 LONGsection
A.4.1 SMALLchunk
Design Documentation | Final Booklet
12
Construction Documents Final Booklet
Sheet List Sheet Name Cover Page 3D Views Interior Rendering Parcel Profile Navigate LA Site Plan with Tax Assessor Map
A0.3 A0.4
A0.5
A1.00 A1.01
Location: Los Angeles, CA
A1.02 A1.03 A2.00 A2.01 A2.02 A2.03 A2.04 A3.00 A3.01 A3.02 A3.03 A3.04 A3.05 A3.06 A4.00 A4.01 A4.02 A4.03 A5.00 A5.01
4B Seminar
Chi Hung Leung Architecture
A5.02 A5.03 A6.00 A6.01 E1.00
E1.01
E1.02
Level 4a 31'Roof - 0" 30' - 0" Level 4 30' - 0" 5 A3.06
1 A3.06
level 3 28' - 0" No.
Description
Level 4a 31'Roof - 0" 30' - 0" Level 4 30' - 0"
Chi Hung Leung Architecture
level 3 28' - 0"
Date
Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos
Chi Hung Leung Residential House Cover Page Project Number Issue Date Author Checker
Project number Date Drawn by Checked by
A0
3D View 0 Scale
Level 3 22' - 0" Level 3 20' - 0"
Group Project Instructor: Jay Vanos, Pavel Getov Jan - Apr 2015
Level 3 20' - 0"
6 A3.06
2 A3.06
Level 2 15' - 0"
Chi Hung Leung Architecture
Level 2 15' - 0"
Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos
4
1
5
A3.02
1
6
A1.02
7
8
No.
Level 2 12' - 0" Level 2 10' - 0"
Description: THe students are required to produce a revit-based digital model and a set of tecnical drawings.
Description
3 A3.06
Date
Chi Hung Leung Residential House Site Section - East
Checked by
4/22/2015 3:17:42 PM
Project Number Issue Date Author Checker
Project number Date Drawn by
A1.03
9
3/16" = 1'-0"
Scale
3
Chi Hung Leung
Keynote Legend
06 11 00.H1
Key Value
Level 4a 31' - 0"
Level 4a 31' - 0" 06 11 00.B12 Roof 06 11 00.B12
Roof 30' - 0"
Keynote Text
Level 1 0' - 0" Level 1 0' - 0"
06 11 00.B12 06 11 00.H1 06 13 23.C2
Level 4 30' - 0"
Level 4 30' - 0"
level 3 28' - 0"
level 3 28' - 0"
4 A3.06
8 A3.06
30' - 0" Chi Hung Leung Architecture
Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos
2
1
Date
9
Drawn by
A4.01
Checked by
1
A3.05
Chi Hung Leung Architecture
First Detail of Second Callout of Section 2 1" = 1'-0"
1 A3.01
1
3
Project Number Issue Date Author Checker
Project number 3
5
Residential House Wall Section
Level 1 0' - 0" Level 1 0' - 0"
Level 1 0' - 0"
06 13 23.C2 06 11 00.B12 06 11 00.B12
Date
Level 2 10' - 0"
7 A3.06 No.
Description
Detail of Callout of Section 2 1" = 1'-0"
Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos
2
8
Second Callout of Section 2 1/2" = 1'-0"
1
Callout of Section 2 1/2" = 1'-0"
1
1/2" = 1'-0"
Scale
A3.03
06 11 00.B12
Level 3 20' - 0"
4/22/2015 3:17:52 PM
1
9
3
Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos
General Notes and Drawing Symbols Site Plan Site Axonometri c SIte Section - North Site Section - East Control Plan First Floor Plan Second Floor Plan Third Floor Plan Roof Plan Rendered Section Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Wall Section Details of Wall Section West Elevation North Elevation East Elevation South Elevation Enlarged Plan Kitchen Kitchen Elevation Enlarged Plan Bathroom Bathroom Elevation Door and Window Schedule Wall Types and Schedule First Floor Plan Electrical Plan Second Floor Plan Electrical Plan Third Floor Plan Electrical Plan
4/22/2015 3:16:32 PM
Sheet Number A0 A0.1 A0.2
Level 3 20' - 0" 06 13 23.C2
06 11 00.B12 06 11 00.B12
7 1 A1.02
No.
Description
Date 1
A4.02 -
A4.00 1
6
Second Detail of Second Callout of Section 2 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
No.
3
2
Date
1 A3.02
3
9 9
Level 2 12' - 0" Level 2 10' - 0"
06 11 00.B12
Description
6
Second Detail of Callout of Section 2 1" = 1'-0"
5
06 13 23.C2
Level 1 0' - 0"
06 11 00.B12 06 11 00.B12
Level 1 0' - 0"
Level 2 10' - 0"
Level 1 0' - 0"
06 13 23.C2
4
Chi Hung Leung
Level 1 0' - 0"
06 11 00.B12 06 11 00.B12
Chi Hung Leung
Residential House Details of Wall Section
Level 1 0' - 0"
Residential House Control Plan 1
3
Third Detail of Callout of Section 2 3 1" = 1'-0"
2
1
A3.06
Fourth Detail of Callout of Section 2 4 1" = 1'-0"
As indicated
Scale
Project Number Issue Date Author Checker
Date Drawn by Checked by
4/22/2015 3:17:43 PM
Drawn by Checked by
Fourth Detail of Second Callout of Section 2 8 1" = 1'-0"
A2.00
4/22/2015 3:17:54 PM
Project Number Issue Date Author Checker
Project number Date
Third Detail of Second Callout of Section 2 1" = 1'-0"
7
Project number
A4.03
1/4" = 1'-0"
Scale
9
A4.01 1
1
A1.03
Chi Hung Leung Architecture 1
Chi Hung Leung Architecture
1
A3.01
A3.04 34' - 7 7/32"
Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos
Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos
Chi Hung Leung Architecture
0' - 0"
8 DN
UP
1
Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos
10' - 1"
A3.03
2
1
9
15' - 6"
3
Room Schedule
A4.01
Lobby R
23' - 7 7/32"
1
11' - 0"
Garage Bedroom Bathroom Living Room Kitchen Bathroom Library Bedroom Lobby Bathroom Closet Bedroom Closet Bedroom Lobby Bathroom Mechanical Room
5' - 4 5/8"
1 A3.04
R
7
1
8
4' - 0"
1 A1.02
1
47
A3.03
R
Bathroom
1 R
3
R
R
29' - 8 1/8"
2
3
R
R
1
506 SF 195 SF 92 SF 580 SF
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
112 SF 159 SF 537 SF 353 SF 464 SF 180 SF 118 SF 614 SF 109 SF 323 SF 272 SF 142 SF 63 SF
Chi Hung Leung Architecture
Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos
5' - 2"
A4.02 -
Bedroom 8
58
UP
7
No.
Description
Date
1
No.
Description
A1.02
Date
57
R
7
48
1 R
Library
20' - 3 1/8"
1
Area
1 2 3 4
R
A4.00
15' - 6"
Bedroom 2
Number
A1.03
A3.01
9
Name
1
1
6
2
1
No.
Description
Date
R
16' - 1"
A3.02
A4.02 -
R
45
Revision 1
Description
Date 4-18-15
R
12' - 0"
Kitchen 5
1
3D View 1
2
3D View 2
DW 19' - 0"
10' - 6 31/32"
Residential House Second Floor Plan
Residential House 3D Views
10' - 4 7/8"
4
Chi Hung Leung
Drawn by Checked by
A2.02 Scale
13Construction Documents | Final Booklet
1/4" = 1'-0"
1 A4.03
5' - 0"
Date
Project Number Issue Date Author Checker
4/22/2015 3:17:44 PM
Project number
Project number Date Drawn by Checked by
Project Number Issue Date Author Checker
A2.01 Scale
1/4" = 1'-0"
Project Number Issue Date Author Checker
Project number Date
Residential House First Floor Plan
1 A4.03
Drawn by Checked by
A0.1 Scale 4/22/2015 3:17:43 PM
5' - 4 5/8" 0' - 0 29/32"
Chi Hung Leung
5
Chi Hung Leung Residential House Interior Rendering Project Number Issue Date Author Checker
Project number Date Drawn by Checked by
A0.2 Scale
Text | Text
4/22/2015 3:16:40 PM
W
4/22/2015 3:16:37 PM
42 39
Chi Hung Leung 15' - 7 7/32"
No.
1
4
19' - 0"
6
1
A3.02
5
5' - 5"
R
6
4
REF.
Bathroom
Living Room
1
R
9' - 2 7/8"
3' - 9 27/32"
28' - 1"
R
Garage
R
R
R
R
R
1 A4.00 1
13