2012-2015 Work Sample Southern California Institute of Architecture Chi Hung Leung 9138-8927 Brandon_Leung@Hotmail.com
2013 Summer Internship Olympic Pavilion Location: Los Angeles, CA OCDC Summer Internship May 2013 - Sep 2013
I participated in drawing the details of THe Olympic Pavilion, in which it’s a compeition project. While I was in the office, I was also in charge of the producion of the physical model.
4 OCDC Summer Internship | Olympic Pavilion
OCDC Summer Internship | Olympic Pavilion
5
2A Studio Fire Protection Water Reservoir Location: South Antelope Valley, CA
Individual Project Instructor: Eric Kahn Sep - Dec 2012 If cube is 3D, knot is 2D, and Root is 1D, Knoop is a transitional transformation from volume to line. The figure is anexct which means two similar things separated by a slightly different dissimilitude from each other. All figure and roots are not the same in the knoop project. For example, there is an origin between knot and roots. Following the origin, there are two groups of similar roots. Even though they look the same, they have different amounts of arrayed branches. This project explores the integration between DIscrepancy and Dissimilitude. DIscrepancy refers to The state or quality of being discrepant; difference; inconsistency. It is also an instance of difference or inconsistency: There are certain discrepancies between the two versions of the story. On the other hand, dissimilitude has the similar meaning of disimilarity which means differences. It can also refer to a point of difference.
6 2A Studio | Fire Protection Water Reservoir
2A Studio|Bridge to Nowhere Water Station
17
2A Studio | Fire Protection Water Reservoir
7
2B Studio Los Angeles Art Museum Location: Little Tokyo, Los Angeles, CA 2B Studio Individual Project Instructor: Jenny Wu Jan - Apr 2013 The primiary interest of this project is to create a continuous spatial experience that is composed by a folded circulating geture. Through the explorations of parts-to-whole relationship, the museum is composed by five diffierent parts. The architectural form of this museum encourages people to enter the building through its tail, and it will lead people all the way to the top floor of the whole museum. The secondary circulation lead people from the undergraound level to converge with the main circulation in the lobby. The secondary emphasis of this project is to create an architectural from that emerges from the ground gradually. This is why the spatial sequence of the museum starts in the underground level, and ends in the air.
8 2B Studio | Los Angeles Art Museum
2B Studio | Los Angeles Art Museum
9
3A Studio Pier 26 Natatorium Location: Embarcadero, san francisco, CA
Structure Diagram
B
C
Primary A-Frame
Secondary Supportive A-Frame
Tertiary Supportive One Way Frame
3A Studio Program Diagram A
A
Group Project Instructor: Christopher Korner Sep - Dec 2013 Second Level Floor Plan 1/32” scale
B
C
Large Swimming Pools
This project explores the relationship between structural morphology and overall building mass and organization in the design of a natatorium located on a pier in The Embarcadero in San Francisco. The proposal for this project is to create a multiplatform megastruture natatorium in order to form a modern, relaxing water pool experience while conserving the historic context of the surrounding environment. The inspiration is the Tokyo Bay Project by Kenzo Tange. Without altering the site, the natatorium is like a floating island that sits on top of the original pier columns so as to preserve the existing cultural context. The programs are located inside the giant A-frames with secondary structures supporting the pools. The beginning and the end of structure are composed by repeating A-frames structures. The middle section of the project consists a series of gathering pools in which the idea was from the gathering hot springs from nature. It also has water slides underneath the gathering pools, with several waterfalls coming off from different pools.
10 3A Studio | Pier 26 Natatorium
Medium and Small Swimming Pools
Third Level
Circulation Diagram Second Level
First Level
High Tide Low Tide
Level 3 Circulation Level 2 Circulation Level 1 Circulation
LEVEL iii Matrix Diagram
Section A 1/16” scale
Third Level
Third Level
Second Level
Second Level
LARGE POOL 15’ -3’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / COLD WATER / FRESH / LEISURE LARGE INDIVIDUAL POOLS 10’ DEPTH / EXTERIOR / WARM WATER / FRESH / LEISURE
LARGE POOL 3’ - 15’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / COLD WATER / FRESH / LEISURE
2 SMALL + 2 WADING POOLS 3” - 8’ / EXTERIOR / WARM WATER / FRESH / LEISURE
First Level
LEVEL ii
First Level
Matrix Diagram
LARGE POOL 15’ - 3’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / WARM WATER / FRESH / RECREATION
LARGE SLIDE 6” DEPTH / EXTERIOR / WARM WATER / FRESH / RECREATION
High Tide
High Tide
Low Tide
Low Tide
MEDIUM POOL 3’ - 10’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / COLD WATER / FRESH / LEISURE
LARGE POOL 3’ - 15’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / WARM WATER / FRESH / RECREATION 2 SMALL + 2 WADING POOLS 3” - 8’ / INTERIOR / COLD WATER / FRESH / LEISURE
MEDIUM POOL 10’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / COLD WATER / FRESH / FITNESS
LEVEL i Matrix Diagram
MEDIUM POOL 10’ DEPTH / INTERIOR / COLD WATER / FRESH / FITNESS
Section C 1/32” scale
Section B 1/32” scale
B
C
A
A
B
Third Level Floor Plan 1/32” scale
B
C
A
C
A
B
C
First Level Floor Plan 1/32” scale
3A Studio | Pier 26 Natatorium
11
3B Studio School of Music Location: manhattan, new york
Group Project Instructor: Darin Johnstone Jan - Apr 2014 For the concept of this music school project, we used two different morphologies to different the performance spaces with from the typical programs. We wanted to bring out the continuity and the dynamics aspect of the performance space in the music school. THerefore, the theater spaces are connected to each other continuously. The appearance of the external facade came from the internal floor plan datum and the levels of importance. The more important of the internal program is, the more coffers and windows would be attracted to it. Because the largest theater is located at the right half of the music school, The right half of the external facade expresses a very intensed characteristic. This is why the right half of the external facade are appeared to be more dramatic and denser than the left half of the facade. On the other hand, we also want to connect the internal public spaces with the site environment. This is why we chose the combination of windows and coffer so as to support our argument. 12 3B Studio | School of Music
Morphology A: Single Curved Mass
Primary program is bounded by single curvature planes to generate a morphology of creased edges and curved surfaces.
Morphology B: Prismatic Shell
quadrilateral tesselations envelope the auxiliary program to create an exterior prismatic skin.
Morphology A+B: Nested
The negative void from the impacted morphologies enables access to light wells and spatial affects.
Bound Theatres
Academic
Administrative
Program Massing
Acoustical
Circulation
Public
3B Studio | School of Music
13
4A Studio City Operations Location: Downtown Los Angeles, CA 4A Studio Group Project Instructor: Alexis Rochas Sep - Dec 2014 Website: http://brandonleung.wix.com/studio4a Description: We looked at the downtown Los Angeles Zoning Map and discovered that it’s The existing zoning map of downtown Los Angeles is figural and each zone is well segregated from each other. There are four basic zoning which are residential zone, commercial zone, industrial zone, and green space. For instance, green space includes parks and public spaces while residential zone has residential houses, and apartments, etc. We have the idea that each city block even a single building has its own zoning. Through manipulating and redistributing the ratios between different zonings, each one square mile microzones will produce a variety of different results. We Also have the idea that the city won’t behave in a concentrated metropolis, but it could potentially be like a distributed metropolis, in which all of the one square mile microzone samples are all separated from each other.
14 4A Studio | City Operations
4A Studio | City Operations
15
Design Development BAM
Final Booklet
B
Golkar
Architects Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar
music
TAUT
Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation
Location: New York, CA
PROJECTdescription The TAUT Institute of Music is a non-profit project. It contains 3 theaters for student and public use, and classes for up to 720 students. 56,236 SQ FT 11 Floors 3 Theaters 500 Seats 1A Construction Type A1, A3, B Occupancy Types
Permeable Roof 2' x 2' panel
Permeable Roof 2' x 2' panel
Radiant Floor 4" OC
Primary Structure 24' steel pipe
Concrete
structural floor
Secondary
6" x 6" steel member
Metal Decking
3" corrugated steel
musicTAUT is the new home of the NewYorkMusicInstitute. The NewYorkMusicInstitute is recognized around the world as the spearhead of acoustical academia, consistently ranking in the top 5 globally with their world-renown Master of Music (M.Mus) and Master of Arts in Pedagogy of Music Theory (MA.MusT). The new facility, a mere three blocks from their current home, will allow them to comfortably double the student body: three new theatres enable student performances to be kept in house, with the addition of 15 classrooms, 10 large practice rooms and 6 recording studios to facilitate the arts. These new spaces are also available for public use, to better integrate the school into its neighboorhood.The NewYorkMusicInstitute is pursuing LEED gold on the musicTaut project, as it is commited to bettering the world around them; here, music is taught.
Tertiary
3" x 3" steel member
I-beam
W18 x 119/W10 x 112
A.0.0 COVERpage
Panel
4' x 8' expanded mesh panel
Hanging Ceiling gypsum board
Radiant Floor
4A Seminar
4" OC
Catwalk 30" width
Concrete
structural floor
BAM Thompson Street
La Guardia Pl
Golkar Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar
TAUT
aluminum window frame
I-beam
W18 x 119/W10 x 112
Primary Structure 24' steel pipe
Hanging Ceiling gypsum board
Secondary
6" x 6" steel member
Glass
double-glazed
Tertiary
3" x 3" steel member
Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation
West Houston Street
B A M P
m
T
H A
Mullion Panel
4' x 8' expanded mesh panel
Interior Finish
A D
West Broadway Street
Thompson Street
A.0.2 SITEplan
1’-0” = 0’ - 1/32”
F
177'-4 3/4"
A
aluminum window frame
GFRG
Description:
C
D
E
165'-6"
125'-6"
B
105'-6"
BAM Golkar
A
36'-6 3/4"
65'-6"
Architects Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar
3
music
53'-0"
THe students are required to produce a 9’x9’ drawing by the end of the semester. The drawing needs to incorporate multiple systems such as ADA, egress, fire sprinklers, and hvac systems, etc.
Metal Decking
3" corrugated steel
Mullion
Architects
music
Group Project Instructor: Scott Uriu, Pavel Getov Sep - Dec 2014
Glass
double-glazed
G
2
TAUT
MAIN THEATER
Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City 33'-0"
AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation
LOBBY
1
A B
A.1.0 FIRSTfloor F
G
177'-4 3/4"
125'-6"
B
C
D
E
165'-6"
105'-6"
65'-6"
THEATRE 902 CLASS ROOM
177'-4 3/4"
165'-6"
C
D
E
105'-6"
125'-6"
B
65'-6"
BAM Golkar
A
36'-6 3/4"
Architects 3
53'-0"
music
LOBBY
TAUT
8TH FLOOR
AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation
Golkar Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar
music
EL97'-11"
CLASS ROOM
TAUT
7TH FLOOR EL84'-0"
THEATRE 801
6TH FLOOR EL70'-0"
Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City
5TH FLOOR
EL56'-0"
CONCERT HALL 303
CLASS ROOM
AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation
Primary structure 24ӯ steel pipe
Secondary
6” x 6” steel member
Tertiary
3” x 3” steel member
Panel
4’ x 8’ perforated aluminum
Radiant Floor 4” OC
Concrete
structural floor
Metal decking steel
4TH FLOOR EL42'-0"
BAM Golkar
Architects Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar
music
TAUT
Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation
I-beam
Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City
33'-0"
RECORDING
RECORDING
CLASS ROOM
2
CONCERT HALL 303
Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar
BAM Architects
9TH FLOOR EL112'-0"
F
A
36'-6 3/4"
W18 x 119/W10 x 112
CLASS ROOM
3RD FLOOR EL 28'-0"
Hanging ceiling
CONCERT HALL 202
GFRG
Glass
2ND FLOOR EL14'-0"
double-glazed
1
LOBBY
Mullion
aluminium window frame
STREET LEVEL EL 0’-0”
A.1.1 THIRDfloor
16 Design Documentation | Final Booklet
CONCERT HALL 101
A.2.0 LONGsection
A.4.1 SMALLchunk
Panel
4' x 8' expanded mesh panel
BAM
BAM
Architects
Architects
Golkar
Golkar
Tertiary
3" x 3" steel member
Secondary
6" x 6" steel member
Primary Structure 24' steel pipe
Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar
Waterproof Membrane 0.065" @ 500,000 ohms/ft²
Brandon Leung Arnold Kim Melody Javaherian Paniz Golkar
music
music
GFRG
interior panel
Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City
Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City
Catwalk
AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation
Finish coat
gloss coat acrylic concrete sealer
Rigid Insulation
TAUT
Extruded Polystyrene Foam
Shotcrete Grade1
Primary Steel Cage 10' OC
30" width
TAUT AS 3040 Fall 2014 Design Documentation
I-beam
W18 x 119/W10 x 112
Radiant Floor 4" OC
Concrete
structural floor
Metal Decking
3" corrugated steel
Return Air Hanging Ceiling gypsum board
Supply Air
Outside Air
B
Mechanical Unit
A.4.4 2DwallSECTION
A.7.0 HVACdiagram
BAM
Pipe Structure Panel Structure Expanded Mesh
$ $ $ $
Facade
3,614 226,840 3,185,100 3,415,554
$/SF 560
SteelSystem
$ 25,607,736 1,743,588 Costs 24” $Diameter Steel Pipe 27,351,324 $ Shell Costs Costs 4’ x 8’ Expanded MetalLand Lathe
SOFT COSTS Comission 18% 18%
Total $9,888,484.88 $1,088,640.00
$10,977,124.88
Brandon Leung Factory weld Shell
Concrete FloorKim $ 3,915,480 Arnold Member Shotcrete+GFRG 7” x$7” Steel 5,612,188 Melody Javaherian 9,527,668 $
SteelSystem_Structural Steel
$924 @ 27,714 ft
Shell_Concrete Floor
$120 @ 32,629 SF
SystemAssembly_Sprinklers
_Core
$3.50 @ 3,152 ft
$120 @ 95,012 SF
music $
11,032 8,160 19,192
TAUT
Facade_Panel Structure
CONTINGENCIES Contingencies
Expanded Metal Lathe Estimation SystemAssembly W 1$x 10 $
m
1/2” Dual Glazing Radiant Floor
T
Structural Floor W 1 x 10 W 2 x 10
6” x 6” Steel Member Paniz Golkar
Sprinklers HVAC
Br A M Pa
Total $6,048,000
$6,048,000
Architects
$1.91 @ 1892 ft
A
LAND COSTS Lot Size 10,800SF
Golkar
Structural Steel Rolled Steel Rib
Facade_Pipe Structure
G
Construction
Margin 5% 10%
Ceiling
H A
Total $2,746,801.36 $5,493,602.71
AS D
$8,240,404.07
3” x 3” Steel member
$21.40 @ 10,600 ft
3” x 1” Diameter Pipe
Core Glazing Finishes
Interior+Finishes $ $ $ $
11,401,440 1,107,925 2,112,924 12,509,365
Houston St Performing Arts School, New York City
OVERALL PROJECT COST Category Land Cost Shell Cost Soft Cost Contingency
Total $6,048,000.00 $54,936,027.00 $10,977,124.88 $8,240,404.07
$80,201,555.95
TOTAL SHELL COSTS
AS 3040 Fall 2014 $ 54,936,027 Design Documentation
Facade_Expanded Mesh
$100 @ 31,851 SF
SteelSystem_Rolled Steel Ribs
$462 @ 3,774 ft
Shell_Shotcrete+GFRG
$172 @ 32,629 SF
SystemAssembly_HVAC
Pipe Structure Panel Structure Expanded Mesh
Facade_Pipe Structure
$1.91 @ 1892 ft
_Glazing
$2 @ 4,080 ft
Structural Steel Rolled Steel Rib
$ $ $ $
Facade
3,614 226,840 3,185,100 3,415,554
$65 @ 17,045 SF
25,607,736 1,743,588 27,351,324
Terms 3.81% @ 15yr
Monthly Payment $548,775
LAND COSTS Lot Size 10,800SF
$/SF 560
Total $6,048,000
$6,048,000
SteelSystem
$ $ $
LOAN COSTS Loan $80,201,555.95
SOFT COSTS Costs Shell Costs
Comission 18%
Total $9,888,484.88
Design Documentation | Final Booklet
17
Construction Documents Final Booklet
Sheet List Sheet Name Cover Page 3D Views Interior Rendering Parcel Profile Navigate LA Site Plan with Tax Assessor Map
A1.00 A1.01 A1.02 A1.03 A2.00 A2.01 A2.02 A2.03 A2.04 A3.00 A3.01 A3.02 A3.03 A3.04 A3.05
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Chi Hung Leung Architecture
Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos
General Notes and Drawing Symbols Site Plan Site Axonometri c SIte Section - North Site Section - East Control Plan First Floor Plan Second Floor Plan Third Floor Plan Roof Plan Rendered Section Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Wall Section Details of Wall Section West Elevation North Elevation East Elevation South Elevation Enlarged Plan Kitchen Kitchen Elevation Enlarged Plan Bathroom Bathroom Elevation Door and Window Schedule Wall Types and Schedule First Floor Plan Electrical Plan Second Floor Plan Electrical Plan Third Floor Plan Electrical Plan
A3.06 A4.00 A4.01 A4.02 A4.03 A5.00 A5.01 A5.02 A5.03 A6.00 A6.01 E1.00
E1.01
E1.02
3
1
9
A4.01 1
1
No.
Description
A1.03
1
Date
1
A3.01
A3.04 34' - 7 7/32"
8
Chi Hung Leung Residential House Cover Page
Drawn by
A3.03
A0
3D View 0
DN
UP
1
Project Number Issue Date Author Checker
Project number Date
Checked by
1
2
0' - 0"
A0.5
15' - 6"
Scale
10' - 1"
A0.3 A0.4
4/22/2015 3:16:32 PM
Sheet Number A0 A0.1 A0.2
4B Seminar Lobby R
9
R
Chi Hung Leung Architecture
7
Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos
4' - 0"
1 A1.02
Group Project Instructor: Jay Vanos, Pavel Getov Jan - Apr 2015
1
5
A3.02
1
6
A1.02
7
R
8
Date
A4.00
1
1
Library
Bedroom
7
8
6
Chi Hung Leung Residential House Site Section - East
A3.02
3/16" = 1'-0"
R
R
A1.03 Scale
R
Checked by
4/22/2015 3:17:42 PM
Drawn by
Description:
1
Project Number Issue Date Author Checker
Project number Date
A4.02 -
20' - 3 1/8"
Description
R
No.
29' - 8 1/8"
R
4
R
1
9
A4.01 1
Chi Hung Leung Architecture
Bathroom 6
5
5' - 5"
2
R
3
9' - 2 7/8"
3' - 9 27/32"
THe students are required to produce a revit-based digital model and a set of tecnical drawings.
1 A3.01 Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos
8
4
1 A3.03
7 1
19' - 0"
A1.02
1
15' - 7 7/32"
5' - 4 5/8" 0' - 0 29/32"
A4.02 -
A4.00 1
No.
Description
Date
1
6 1 A3.02
A4.03
5
4
Chi Hung Leung Residential House Control Plan 1
Date Drawn by Checked by
4/22/2015 3:17:43 PM
Project Number Issue Date Author Checker
Project number
A4.03
A2.00 1/4" = 1'-0"
Scale
Chi Hung Leung Architecture
Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos
Chi Hung Leung Architecture
Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos
3
2
1
9 Room Schedule
A4.01
11' - 0"
A3.01
Garage Bedroom Bathroom Living Room Kitchen Bathroom Library Bedroom Lobby Bathroom Closet Bedroom Closet Bedroom Lobby Bathroom Mechanical Room
5' - 4 5/8"
1 A3.04
1
8 1
47
A3.03
Bathroom
1 R
3
R
5' - 2"
R
R
2
3
15' - 6"
Bedroom 2
48
Number
Area
A1.03
23' - 7 7/32"
1
Name
1
1
58
1 2 3 4
506 SF 195 SF 92 SF 580 SF
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
112 SF 159 SF 537 SF 353 SF 464 SF 180 SF 118 SF 614 SF 109 SF 323 SF 272 SF 142 SF 63 SF
Chi Hung Leung Architecture
Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos
UP
7
No.
Description
Date
1 A1.02
1 R
R
57
2
Description
Date
16' - 1"
No.
1
28' - 1"
Garage
A4.02 -
R
R
R
A4.00 1
Living Room
1
4 R
6
1
No.
Revision 1
Description
Date 4-18-15
1 A3.02
45
12' - 0"
R
R
Kitchen
1
3D View 1
2
3D View 2
19' - 0"
Chi Hung Leung
5 10' - 6 31/32"
Residential House 3D Views
10' - 4 7/8"
4
Chi Hung Leung
Date
Project number Date Drawn by Checked by
Project Number Issue Date Author Checker
A2.01 Scale
18Construction Documents | Final Booklet
1/4" = 1'-0"
Drawn by Checked by
A0.1 Scale 4/22/2015 3:17:43 PM
5' - 0"
1 A4.03
Project Number Issue Date Author Checker
Project number
Residential House First Floor Plan
Chi Hung Leung Residential House Interior Rendering Project Number Issue Date Author Checker
Project number Date Drawn by Checked by
A0.2 Scale
4/22/2015 3:16:40 PM
W
39
4/22/2015 3:16:37 PM
42
REF.
DW
5
9 3
9
3
Keynote Legend
06 11 00.H1
Key Value
Level 4a 31' - 0"
Level 4a 31'Roof - 0" 30' - 0" Level 4 30' - 0" 5 A3.06
1 A3.06
level 3 28' - 0"
Level 4a 31'Roof - 0" 30' - 0" Level 4 30' - 0"
06 11 00.B12 Roof 06 11 00.B12
Roof 30' - 0"
Chi Hung Leung Architecture
30' - 0"
Level 4 30' - 0"
Level 4 30' - 0"
level 3 28' - 0"
level 3 28' - 0"
Chi Hung Leung Architecture
06 13 23.C2
level 3 28' - 0"
Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos
06 11 00.B12 Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos
06 11 00.B12
5
First Detail of Second Callout of Section 2 1" = 1'-0" 1
3
Level 3 22' - 0" Level 3 20' - 0"
Detail of Callout of Section 2 1" = 1'-0"
Level 3 20' - 0"
6 A3.06
06 11 00.B12
2 A3.06
Level 3 20' - 0"
Level 3 20' - 0" 06 13 23.C2
Level 2 15' - 0"
06 11 00.B12 06 11 00.B12
Description
Date
No.
Level 2 10' - 0"
7 A3.06
6
3
2
Second Detail of Callout of Section 2 1" = 1'-0"
3
9 9
Level 2 12' - 0" 06 11 00.B12
Chi Hung Leung
Level 1 0' - 0"
Project Number Issue Date Author Checker
Project number Date Drawn by Checked by
1
A3.05
Callout of Section 2 1/2" = 1'-0"
1/2" = 1'-0"
Scale
Level 1 0' - 0"
Level 2 10' - 0"
Level 1 0' - 0"
06 13 23.C2
Residential House Details of Wall Section
Level 1 0' - 0"
Project number Date Drawn by
7
Checked by
Third Detail of Second Callout of Section 2 1" = 1'-0" 8
Fourth Detail of Second Callout of Section 2 1" = 1'-0"
3
Third Detail of Callout of Section 2 1" = 1'-0"
4
Scale
As indicated
Chi Hung Leung Architecture
Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos
Description
Date
No.
Chi Hung Leung
Project Number Issue Date Author Checker
Project number Date Drawn by Checked by
A0.3
Description
Date
Chi Hung Leung
Residential House Parcel Profile
Scale
Project Number Issue Date Author Checker
A3.06
Fourth Detail of Callout of Section 2 1" = 1'-0"
Chi Hung Leung Architecture
No.
Chi Hung Leung
Level 1 0' - 0"
Consultant: Pavel Getov Jay Vanos
Residential House Navigate LA Site Plan with Tax Assessor Map Project Number Issue Date Author Checker
Project number Date 4/22/2015 3:17:00 PM
Second Callout of Section 2 1/2" = 1'-0"
Level 1 0' - 0"
06 11 00.B12 06 11 00.B12
06 11 00.B12 06 11 00.B12
4/22/2015 3:17:52 PM
4 A3.06
8 A3.06
Level 2 10' - 0"
06 13 23.C2
Residential House Wall Section
Level 1 0' - 0" Level 1 0' - 0"
Date
Second Detail of Second Callout of Section 2 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
3 A3.06
Level 1 0' - 0" Level 1 0' - 0"
Description
4/22/2015 3:17:54 PM
No.
Level 2 12' - 0" Level 2 10' - 0"
Drawn by Checked by
A0.4 Scale
4/22/2015 3:17:19 PM
Level 2 15' - 0"
2
Keynote Text
06 11 00.B12 06 11 00.H1 06 13 23.C2
Level 4a 31' - 0"
Construction Documents | Final Booklet
19