Odpady jądrowe – globalny raport Focus Europe

Page 78

WNWR 2019  — 6. COSTS AND FINANCING

78

There are arguable advantages for the external management of funds: a higher degree of transparency, protection against a shortfall of financial resources caused by the bankruptcy of operators, and improved public confidence. Beside the high costs for taxpayers, problems with competition policies of the EU could also arise, as financial support for the operators by the respective government could be seen as state aid.250 ACCUMULATION OF THE FUNDS After the costs have been estimated (see section 6.2), the necessary funds need to be accumulated. Here, one crucial factor is timing, as the funds have to be available when they are needed. The main scenario is to build up a fund over the entire expected lifetime of a nuclear power plant or facility. However, shorter periods of time are also conceivable (for instance, 25 years in Germany). More and more reactors are shutting down before they reach the end of their license, for instance in the US, where many reactors have already or will prematurely close due to unfavorable economic conditions. In some rare cases, funds for decommissioning and decontamination of a nuclear power plant have to be fully collected by the start of operation, such as in France since 2006 (so it does not apply to the entire past and currently operating fleet).251 However, no reactor has gone into operation in France since that date. The accumulation of the funds can either be achieved by a fee, a levy set on the sale of electricity, “internally” by the operators who set aside funds from the revenue obtained from the sale of electricity, or by the investment of the funds. As most of the costs only occur in the future, a crucial aspect is whether funds or future provisions are based on discounted or undiscounted costs.252 If the costs are not discounted, the operators have to set aside the full amount of the estimated costs. Only a few nuclear funding systems use undiscounted costs. If costs are discounted, the funds are expected to grow over time. Here the provisions are determined using the inflation rate until the due date and then discounted with an interest rate, which is supposed to represent the expected rate of return. The employed discount rates range widely (for example, 5.5 percent in Germany versus 1.5 percent in Spain). A cost escalation rate is not always assumed, in France decommissioning and waste management expenses are expected to grow with the general inflation rate, while in Germany a “nuclear-specific inflation rate” of 1.97 percent is calculated on top of the inflation rate. Applying only the general inflation rate could eventually lead to an underestimation of the costs and hence the amount of the funds. Depending on the fund’s nature, a major source of resource accumulation is the investment of the fund. Here a conflict of interest arises between the operator and the regulator in choosing the investment strategy. The former will typically prefer riskier investment strategies with higher rates of return, while the latter will ideally prefer a more secure investment strategy and accept lower rates of return. In Sweden, for instance, following the financial crisis of 2008, the rate of return on long-term bonds was lower than expected, and concerns of underfunding grew, leading to a change of the investment strategy. Since 2017, the funds can now be put into less secure investments than government bonds. Small changes in the assumptions of the rates have tangible effects on the present value of the financial resources and hence the amount of funds that need to be set aside; in particular, when the rate of return (discount rate) is prone to overestimation and the cost escalation rate to underestimation. 250 Neri, E., French, A., Urso, M.E., Deffrennes, M., Rothwell, G., Rehak, I., Weber, I., Carroll, S. and Daniska, V. 2016, Costs of

Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants (No. NEA-7201). Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). 251 Ibid. 252 A provision is an account in the balance sheet of an operator but represents only liability; this does not mean that these

funds are invested to finance decommissioning or waste management.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Quantities of waste

2hr
pages 97-148

Summary

1min
page 94

Costs and financing

2min
page 93

Waste management policies and facilities

2min
page 92

Financing schemes for interim storage

2min
page 84

Integrated financing schemes

2min
page 87

6.4 Summary

5min
pages 88-89

Financing schemes for disposal

6min
pages 85-86

Quantities of waste

2min
page 91

Decommissioning costs

6min
pages 80-81

Accumulation of the funds

3min
page 78

Overview and nature of the funds

2min
page 77

5.5 Summary

2min
page 75

Extended storage

4min
pages 73-74

Deep borehole disposal

3min
page 70

LILW-repositories

3min
page 67

Host rocks

2min
page 66

5.1 Historical background

16min
pages 58-62

5.2 The context of nuclear waste management

5min
pages 63-64

4.7 Summary

2min
page 57

4.5 Risks from the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel

5min
pages 53-54

Risks to nuclear workers

3min
page 51

Uranium mine tailings

3min
page 49

Health risks from exposures to uranium

3min
page 47

4.1 Radiation risks of nuclear waste

2min
page 45

Uranium mining

3min
page 48

4.2 Risks from uranium mining, mine tailings, enrichment, and fuel fabrication

2min
page 46

3.4 Summary

4min
pages 43-44

Decommissioning waste

2min
page 34

Uranium mining, milling, processing and fuel fabrication

1min
page 22

Executive summary

28min
pages 11-20

Operational waste

2min
page 32

2.4 Summary

2min
page 30

2.3.1 The IAEA classification

5min
pages 25-26

2.1 Types of waste: the nuclear fuel chain

2min
page 21

Foreword

5min
pages 3-4

Key Insights

2min
pages 9-10
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.