Issuu

Choice

NOV BIS US

EVERY DAY, EVERY WEEK, MONTH, YEAR, THROUGHOUT OUR ENTIRE LIFETIME: WE MAKE DECISIONS, ONE AFTER ANOTHER. CHOICES ARE SO INHERENT AND EMBEDDED WITHIN OUR EXISTENCE – OBSERVED THROUGH PHYSICAL MANIFESTATIONS (E.G. TEST SCORES) – YET AT THE SAME TIME THE NOTION ITSELF IS FLUID AND ABSTRACT; CHOICES CAN BE GOOD, BAD, A MIXTURE OF BOTH, SPECIFIC TO ONE OR MANY ASPECTS OF LIFE, HAVE VISIBLE INSTANT CONSEQUENCES OR DISTANT LONG-TERM ONES... THE LIST GOES ON.

IN THIS EDITION OF NOVUS, WE MAKE THE CHOICE TO EXPLORE THE CONCEPT OF CHOICES META, IS IT NOT?

THROUGHOUT THE MAGAZINE, OUR WRITERS HAVE DECIDED TO EXAMINE THIS IDEA IN A VARIETY OF WAYS: ARTICLES LIKE ‘MORAL DILEMMAS ON CHOICES’ (CAM TU, Y12), ‘ONE MAN’S CHOICE SAVED THE WORLD FROM NUCLEAR WAR’ (GEONYEONG (LEO), Y11) AND ‘ARE HUMANS CHOOSING TO LIVE IN THE PRESENT MORE ONLY NOW?’ (VAN TUAN, Y11) DELVE INTO THE IDEA AND HOW IT IS AFFECTED BY HUMAN ETHICS, BELIEFS AND HUMAN NATURE THIS CONCEPTION IS ALSO REFLECTED IN ‘MUSE: CHOICE IN ARTWORK’ (DAKYUNG (OLIVIA), Y10), WHEREIN DIFFERENT ARTISTS’ BELIEFS AND THOUGHTS LED TO DIFFERING MUSES AND ARTISTIC PATHWAYS UNDERTAKEN.

LOOKING AT CHOICE ON A PERSONAL LEVEL, THE POEM ‘CHESS GAME’ (MINJU (JUDY), Y12) BARES ITS HEART – DEPICTING TENDER NAIVETY, CONFUSION, ANXIETY – TO FINALLY ARRIVE AT A POIGNANT REMINDER THAT ULTIMATELY, YOU HOLD THE CHOICE TO ‘MAKE A MOVE’ (AS DESCRIBED BY JUDY) TOWARDS THE PERSON YOU LOVE. SIMILARLY, WORKS SUCH AS ‘CHOICES OF LIFE’ (TU ANH (CASSIE), Y11) AND ‘CHOICE IN HOBBIES’ (CHAEWON (CHLOE), Y10) ANALYSE THE CONCEPT’S RELATION WITH OUR PERSONAL LIVES, BY ILLUSTRATING THE ROLE OF PASSION ON CAREER CHOICE ALONG WITH THE IMPACTS OF EXTERNAL SOURCES (I.E. FRIENDS, SOCIAL MEDIAS, STEREOTYPES) ON OUR PERSONAL VALUES, AND THE BENEFITS OF PARTICIPATING IN ARTISTIC HOBBIES, RESPECTIVELY.

NOT ONLY IN THE ARTICLES, THE NOTION IS DEVELOPED, INTERPRETED AND REPRESENTED IN EACH DESIGN THE SUBTLE AND OVERT CHOICES DESIGNERS ENACT, IN TERMS OF TEXTURE; COMPOSITION; COLOURS; SHAPES; IMAGERY, ALLOWED THE WRITTEN WORDS TO BE VISUALISED AND NEW MEANINGS TO BE CREATED. THEREFORE, I ENCOURAGE YOU TO TRULY NOTICE THE DESIGNS IN ALL THEIR CRAFT, DEDICATION AND THOUGHTFULNESS, BECAUSE MAGAZINES ARE JUST AS MUCH PIECES OF WRITING AS THEY ARE PIECES OF VISUAL ART

IN THE END, HOW YOU INTEGRATE THE EXPLORATION IN THIS MAGAZINE WITHIN YOUR LIFE IS YOUR DECISION TO EXECUTE. ALL I CAN SAY IS: I HOPE YOU WILL FIND THIS EDITION AS WONDERFUL AND INCREDIBLE AS I DID.

HAPPY READING!

THAI ANH HOANG

Moral Moral Moral MoralDilemma Dilemma Dilemma

Dilemma Dilemma

Written by Cam Tu Dang Y12

If you are in a moving trolley that’s unable to stop and there are 2 tracks ahead of you, would you keep going and kill one person or swerve and kill 5 people on the other track? What will you do?

Is not making a decision to steer the trolley and let it move on its own equally a choice?

The trolley dilemma was developed by Phillipa Foot in 1967 and since then, there have been many variations of the same concept: sacrifice one to save the majority or vice versa. It has proved to be a useful tool to explore different perspectives on ethics such as utilitarianism and deontology as to be discussed in this article. This deepens our understanding of the human moral compass and in turn, helps us understand how these factors influence our choices.

Designed by Thai Anh Hoang Y12

UUtilitarianism tilitarianism

If you deemed killing one person an acceptable “sacrifice” to save the other five, you are supporting the utilitarianism theory.

Utilitarianism is a development from consequentialism, which only considers the consequences of a decision as the moral standard of right and wrong. It prioritises the maximisation of happiness and/or the minimisation of harm derived from the action. The first concept of hedonism, the pursuit of pleasure, dates back to the 5th century BCE with Greek philosophers Aristippus and Epicurus. There have also been similar utilitarian ideas found throughout history such as the work of 8th century Shantideva who wrote “to stop all [...] pain and suffering of all sentient beings, and to bring about all [...] pleasure and happiness.” It was only until the 13th century that the concept of utilitarianism was explored in depth by Thomas Aquinas in his work Summa Theologica. Much later on, utilitarianism emerged as a prominent ethical branch in the 18th century spearheaded by Jeremy Bentham who is now commonly regarded as the founder.

Intuitively, society has hard-wired that we as a collective must prioritize the ‘greater good’ for humanity, or in the case of the trolley problem, the ‘lesser evil’ by only killing one person. That is the principle of utilitarianism: The best action or decision no matter what is the one that brings the greatest benefit to the most people. Many of those who choose to kill one justify by saying that five is larger than one. But who are we to decide that the one person innately has less value than the five? The underlying condition for an utilitarian is to view things quantitatively, and that ‘happiness’ for each individual is counted equally. The principle is widely applied in many societies today for modern existential threats such as global hunger, injustice, and poverty.

Deontology

On the other hand, if you decided choosing either side would be considered immoral and letting the cart run on its own is better, you would be a part of the deontologist school of thought.

Deontology derives from Greek for duty (deon) and study or science (logos), and just as its name suggests, this principle prioritises ‘duty’ above all. This means that it is the decision or the action that is used for judgement, not the consequences. The term was first used in its specialised definition in 1930 by C.D Broad in his book, Five Types of Ethical Theory. However, the first mention of deontology actually goes back to Jeremy Bentham, the founder of modern utilitarianism.

Deontology and utilitarianism are often considered each other’s foils. In the study of normative ethics, they can be considered two sides of the same coin. However, the biggest difference between these two philosophies is that in utilitarianism, the aim is to maximise the benefits and/or to minimise the suffering, while in deontology, there are clear-cut distinctions of decisions on whether it is ‘good’ or ‘bad’ with rigid moral standards that remain constant regardless of the conditions and consequences. An example to highlight this: If killing a criminal brings more ‘good’ to society, it is justified in the eyes of utilitarianism. For a deontologist, however, the act is simply wrong, as killing is never acceptable, regardless of one man or a hundred, criminal or not. An argument that a deontologist might have against an utilitarian is that if the world follows utilitarianism, it would be permissible to commit extremely immoral acts if such decisions bring about the maximum benefit of society. A case that can demonstrate this argument is Thanos from Marvel Studios. The consequence of snapping his finger would mean there will be less conflicts over scarce resources due to overpopulation, thus minimising ‘suffering’. Utilitarianism allows this to happen at the cost of half the life in the cosmos, while deontology directly condemns the act genocide.

In the eyes of deontology, allowing harm to happen without actively taking part in it - in the trolley problem, that would be pulling the lever- is acceptable. Therefore, from that perspective, not pulling the lever would be considered the ‘correct’ choice.

Rea RrEa ReA eaLiTy LItY

litY liTy lity

Unfortunately, reality is a lot more complex than a mere turning of the lever. The two schools of thought should not be viewed as merely a choice of one or another but more appropriately be placed on a spectrum. It is impossible for an individual to be realistically a deontologist or an utilitarian for all decisions made. The majority will shift between the two principles depending on the situation, or not be on the spectrum at all. Some may even follow the path of egoism, which treats self-interest as the central axis of morality, going against the very principle of utilitarianism.

There are many other ethical theories such as Natural Law Theory, which states all humans innately have certain moral values that are independent of society’s influence; Virtue Ethics, which focuses more on the traits of one ’ s character; and Divine Command Theory, which deposits religion and the teachings of God(s) as a moral compass. Though for sake of the trolley dilemma presented as an introductory guide for this article, it was more appropriate to mainly focus on deontology and utilitarianism as the two main theory responses are typically categorized in.

Some critics have stated that the trolley dilemma and other philosophical problems of similar kind should only be used in philosophical discussions as the situations and conditions do not fully reflect reality. Other critics claimed the opposite: it is precisely these moral dilemmas’ direct and unrealistic features that shed light on the underlying structure behind humans’ moral compass. It supports the understanding of humans’ choices, as an individual in day-to-day situations, and as a collective dealing with socio-economic issues like war, public health, and environmental crises.

Muse: Choice in Artwork

Written by: Dakyung (Olivia) Hwang Y10

A muse choice require

Muses may be everywhere, but an artist’s choice is what brings out the full potential of a muse like a match. A match does not light itself up. ‘Choice’ is what strikes the match and ignites the spark that we showcase as artworks. Mona Lisa, the Weeping Woman, and Starry Night are what we have labelled some of these bright sparks.

Which leads us to the question: What kind of choice can be made to produce the Flame ?

The artistic pathway to completing an artwork differs with each artist: Leonardo Da Vinci painted Mona Lisa because of a commission, Picasso painted the Weeping Woman with the Spanish Civil War as his muse, and Vincent Van Gogh chose to paint an abstract view from his window during his stay at an asylum. The process of creation is completely abstract and personal to the artist, depending on the style of expression or the message they want to convey

The philosophy of letting go applies to not only visual arts, but also the way of living. This mindset or choice refers to releasing physical possessions, emotional attachments, or outdated ideas. We may also call this Trial and Error. As sentimental beings, people tend to dwell on ideas that may not always work. However, it is important to note that the quantity of time and effort spent on an idea is worth sacrificing for the quality of the final product. Discarding is a way of finding clarity and peace of mind, like escaping a slump. Restarting does not mean that all progress is lost and meaningless rather, it allows us to grow from the built-up experiences.

The Art of Letting Go

The Art of Letting Go does not only apply to the creation of an artwork. It can become art itself. Banksy’s ‘Girl with Balloon (2006),’ was auctioned at Sotheby’s in 2018. However, when the hammer hit at $1.4million, the painting started lowering itself through a built-in shredder. This raised the controversy: was Banksy’s surprise performance Art of Prank? The original painting of the ‘Girl with Balloon’ showed a literal image of a girl holding a heart-shaped balloon. It represented the innocent hopes and dreams of a young girl, and by shredding abruptly, Banksy displays a whole new meaning of the loss of innocence. He takes Picasso's quote as a muse: “The urge to destroy is also a creative urge.” Destruction itself becomes the muse for an artwork. The shredded artwork was to be kept in the frame to preserve the value of this performance.

Minimalism Maximalism vs

If art were to be divided into two subjective categories, minimalism and maximalism would be effective broad titles. The philosophy behind these two categories serves an important role in an artwork’s expression.

Minimalism

in its physical form is a timeless aesthetic with direct representation of an idea. It experiments with texture and material, and focuses on having a simple, direct message. This means that the artists are also able to focus on composition, exploring the overall feeling, instead of showcasing details. “No attempt is made to represent an outside reality and instead wants the viewer to respond only to what is in front of them,” minimalism is a purified form of beauty, and in a way, criticising materialism. The process of minimalism shows that discarding unnecessary components only clarifies the expression, instead of taking away from its value.

Maximalism,

put simply, is the choice of going against the limitations of minimalism. A common phrase, “less is more,” is completely disregarded in this form of art. Rather, in this sense, more is more. Maximalism is characterised by its eye-catching richness, often seen as a vibrant expression of the message. This visual stimulation creates an immersive experience using layers, intricacy, and details, escaping into a man-made reality. Maximalism is often associated with escapism as it creates a personal sanctuary away from the limitations of a simplistic world. In article by Luna King, she mentions that maximalism has become “a refuge for those who feel constrained by conventional norms.” Our world is uniform, and individuality is often frowned upon. The artistic choice to be a maximalist is a bold declaration of individuality, unique to each stroke of paint put on paper.

The choice between minimalism and maximalism is a matter of whether simplicity or complexity effectively conveys what the a to express.

Conclusion

Even in the process of writing this article, there has to be a muse, and a stylistic choice of structuring an unorganised content. Every choice made in creation serves a purpose, whether for visual pleasantness, or for a commentary on a controversy. So, if every choice in a creation holds value according to the artist’s intention, the real question is:

Will you choose to ignite a to its full potential? muse

gameChess

Writtenby:Minju(Judy)Kang(Y12)

Castled in the beginning.

The dangling piecesI am the player, who is not in control

The stopwatch whispering “Make a move ” ...

Pieces slipping off my hands

And finally,

Pawns progressing towards your castle

The pawns falling-

Designedby:QueAnhTran(Y12)

The

knights

Leaping and falling

The bishops

Dashing towards

And knocked down

The pattern in the board

And erratic moves of yours

This irony ever confuses me

Lost in the middle of the board

I will never find a way to win

Lost and threatened

But naive,

And the King is on my hand

OneMan’sChoicefrom Nuclear War Saved the World

Written by: Geonyeong (Leo) Lee Y11

Designed by: Hayeon (Rachael) Jung Y11

Stanislav Petrov’s Story

Every day, we make choices: from choosing what to eat for breakfast to choosing which careers to pursue. Among those, there are choices that hold the fate of millions.

In 1983, a Soviet officer named Stanislav Petrov found himself in such a moment. It was a quiet night, when he sat in a room surrounded by computers and screens. Alarms went off and red lights flashed: the Soviet satellite system had detected five missiles launched from the United States. If the system was right, these missiles would soon hit the Soviet Union. Petrov’s job was to report this immediately so his superiors could decide to strike back with nuclear weapons.

But something felt off. Why only five missiles? If the United States wanted to attack, wouldn’t they send hundreds? Petrov also knew the satellite system wasn’t perfect. It was new and could make mistakes. After considering, he made a brave decision: he reported the warning as a false alarm.

This decision was dangerous. If Petrov was wrong, the Soviet Union would be completely unready for a real attack. If his bosses disagreed with him, he could lose his job or worse. But Petrov knew that reporting the attack as real could start a nuclear war, and millions people would die. He trusted his decision and chose peace.

Petrov’s decision turned out to be correct.

The system had made a mistake. Sunlight reflecting off clouds had caused the satellites to think missiles were launched. There was no attack. However, Petrov wasn’t praised for what he did. The Soviet Union kept the incident a secret, and he was even criticized for not following proper processes. He didn’t get any awards or recognition for years. When the story finally became public after the Cold War, many people around the world called him a hero. But Petrov himself didn’t see it that way.

“I was just doing my job,” he said.

Stanislav Petrov’s decision on that night in 1983 is a story that demonstrates how choices matter: though he didn’t think of himself as a hero, his courage and belief had likely saved millions of lives. We all face choices every day. They might not be as big as Petrov’s, but they still matter. His story inspires us to think carefully, trust ourselves, and always try to make the world a better place.

Are Are hhumans umans choosing to choosing to live in the present more live in the present more oonlynow? nlynow?

Or has it always been embedded in human nature?

Writtenby:VanTuanNguyenY11

Designedby:ThaiAnhHoangY12

As we stand at the intersection of technological progress, globalization and access to information like no other time in history, humanity faces several choices.

The 21st century world is one where we have plenty, but also one of the paradoxes of plenty: The more we have, the more we want. This endless desire for more—be it riches, power or prestige—has been part of society since time immemorial. This phenomenon is ingrained into our very essence, a reminder of insatiable greed and the possible need for validation. From ancient empires to modern megacorporations, the story of humankind is in many ways the story of overconsumption. History is full of men and societies who have perished from excess. One of them was Marcus Licinius Crassus, the Roman general whose thirst for riches and military distinction drove him to invade Parthia, where he suffered a shaming defeat at the Battle of Carrhae. His death — signaled by the Parthians pouring molten gold down his throat serves as a drastic warning about the risks of ambition run amok. Yet today, we see the identical greed manifest in the likes of Truong My Lan, whose alleged 12.5 billion dollar fraud case in Vietnam serves to prove how wealth can descend into corruption and extortion on a grand level.

Are humans overconsuming more in the 21st century than ever before? Let's look at the origins of our overconsumption as well as see how human nature, social pressure and economic systems evolve to shape our choices.

Today, over-spending is characteristic of the consumerist trend, driven by fast-fashion retailers (e.g. Shein and Temu.) These companies are the backbone of “fast-fashion” in which clothes and goods are produced en masse at shockingly low prices, taking advantage of high demand for some of the biggest trends. But this business model carries a heavy cost: clothing and trends are engineered to fall “out of fashion” mere moments after the customer buys them, and so a cycle of consumption persists. At the core of this phenomenon is a combination of human psychology and social pressure. Fear of missing out (FOMO), especially generated by social media platforms, has become one of the strongest motivators for overconsumption in the younger target groups. This FOMO mindset is propelled further by influencers, who encourage users to buy items they may not need to fit in with the crowd. This harmful behaviour is further reinforced by the "bargain mentality", where consumers are prone to impulsively purchase cheap items.

Yet, the price of fast fashion is just the tip of the iceberg. Companies such as Shein and Temu have been implicated in using dangerous chemicals in manufacturing, including bisphenol, PFAS (forever chemicals), azo dyes, formaldehyde, flame retardants and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). These chemicals can cause severe adverse health effects, including reproductive problems, cancer, endocrine disruption and respiratory issues. As awareness around the environmental and ethical cost of fast fashion continues to grow, many consumers are still prioritising low prices over sustainable products, thus allowing conglomerates to prioritise profit over people and the planet. One must note that such cycle of overconsumption is not simply an individual choice but a symptom of a bigger systemic problem. Fast fashion brands often forgo environmental regulations, act in their self-interest and evade their social responsibility by releasing toxic chemicals into the environment. In a 2022 report, UNICEF points out that overconsumption in rich countries is "destroying children’s environments across the world, creating a cycle of greed and short-termism" which leaves our future generations to pay the price for our excesses.

The power and wealth of conglomerates, their increasing greed, have a greater and greater effect on the average person sector; very few stable jobs are available for a person. This uncertainty fosters a “live for today” ethos, where we chase after immediate gratification without taking long-term consequences into account. Living with uncertainty, trends and the external invisible pressure of FOMO, makes people respond with more impulsive and excessive spending. In order to reconcile the disparity between low income and high aspirations, many turn to credit cards, loans or “buy now, pay later” schemes to experience a temporary sense of financial security. However, against debt adds to the cycle of overconsumption where everyone buys more than they should so as to try to keep up with those around them.

Research by Kristina Durante and Juliano Laran highlights how stress influences consumer behavior, stating it "leads to increased spending on non-essential goods as a form of emotional relief". For example, in the United States, credit card usage has increased because transaction values are "reaching unprecedented levels", as noted in a 2025 credit report. The reason this trend arises is because accessible credit creates a false sense of security, which encourages people to satisfy their shortterm desires without considering their long-term financial health.

In conclusion, humanity is at a precarious position: prioritising shortterm fulfillment at the cost of long-term consequences. We cannot simply fault the individual for making such choices, considering how social media, easy online shopping, and globalised corporations offering cheap goods altogether morph such choices. In order to break this cycle, we must address the roots of overconsumption that traces all the way from corporate greed, societal pressure to systemic inequality, yet for now, both you and I can make choices to recognise the stimuli that shape our choices and rise above this cycle.

Written by: Tu Anh (Cassie) Tran 11H

Have you ever heard of the saying “We are what we choose”? There are complaints talked quite often by people, about not being rich enough, being unable to achieve their dreams, the hardships they face in life, etc. But do they acknowledge that the circumstances they are enduring right now can actually mirror the choices they made? Regardless of your age, choices will always have to be made because they are inevitable in life, so if you ever complain about an issue, think about what rendered you upset, was it because of the wrong decision you accidentally made? While there are multiple choices available for us to choose from every day , in this article, you will get to know about two of the most discussed ones: careers and personal values

Designed by: Gia Bao An (Rina) Nguyen 11I

o begin with, choosing suitable careers can be very strenuous for some people while this might be an easy task for others. Why is this the case? Well, for those who don’t have to overthink what path they want to pursue, this might be because their passions are already discovered Some might know what they truly want from a young age and decide to follow their passions when they grow up Identifying your interests as soon as possible is always a benefit to choosing the right path, indeed. However, for those who haven’t figured it out, with the development of technology nowadays, you can easily access websites that help navigate career paths for you based on your personality traits

The next aspect of choices is personal values Our identity is influenced by numerous factors, including our circle of friends, the content we consume on social media and the perceptions and standards given for us. To start off, companionship is one of the essential needs in a person ’ s life With family, friends, colleagues or anyone who can support us in general, we are bound to feel safer, more reassured and at ease Companionship is also said to boost one ’ s self-esteem and productivity. So, considering the advantages of having a company above, choosing the right one to spend our precious time on is hugely important This might differ from person to person, but for me, the right company means being able to be ourselves when we are with them, comfortably expressing our opinions without the fear of judgement and always willing to support each other altruistically

Besides our circle of friends, social media platforms and the content we consume online every day also matter tremendously Just imagining the impact of one negative video on our moods and how our day flows can disillusion us how massively influential the internet is, not just to our instant feelings but to our personality in the long term This small example of everyday entertainment proves that while we do not really notice the impact of the content we watch on social media right away, its long-lasting impact on our moods can either change the type of person we are or cause potential mental issues (if not managing what goes in and what goes out of our minds).

Finally, the expectations and standards given for us can incredibly shape our mindset and influence our future goals. An example of social perceptions is "Girls are better at humanities, boys are better at STEM" While there are no statistics to prove this, from our own observation, IT or related subjects' classrooms in university tend to have more boys than girls. This little evidence shows how conventional perceptions can influence people’s perspectives and choices

At the end of the day, we know ourselves the best Although it is an advantage for those who have control of what they want and the people they surround themselves with, in general, choosing anything requires thoughtful consideration, and it is not that we can decide something in a second So, this is a reminder that it is okay to not figure out what career you want to have or which type of person you are at a young age. Whether you are still in school, in your twenties or thirties or even later in life, there will always be opportunities and new doors opened.

inChoice Hobbies

Written by Chloe

Designed by The Phuc

In general, hobbies play a crucial role in personal growth and stress relief. More specifically, artistic hobbies allow us to be creative. In this article, I would like to discuss the benefits of artistic pursuits, which are allowing individualexpression, improving mental well-being, and developing our skills.

Hobbies (e.g. painting and photography) can support mental health because they provide an outlet for individuals to explore, identify and process their emotions. These hobbies have varying tools and techniques available, which means we can represent both negative and positive emotions - from anxiety to joy. Therefore, it can be deeply fulfilling. To add, research shows that creative activities can reduce cortisol levels, which is the hormone associated with stress. So, that means we will feel calmer after completing artistic hobbies.

In addition, artistic hobbies can also contribute to professional success. When participating in these hobbies, we learn and develop skills like attention to detail, patience, and problem-solving. In the working world, these soft skills are required. As such, we can say that creative activities can directly or indirectly prepare students for the job market. For example, the ability to create digital art and make graphic designs are necessary skills to have in careers like marketing, advertising and multi-media production. Even in nonartistic professions, these skills are applicable, especially problem-solving.

Furthermore, by participating in these hobbies, we can develop our preexisting skills. In my experience, learning to draw taught me skills like discipline, patience, and perseverance. Since the process of understanding new techniques, from shading to drawing perspectives, requires consistent practice, I learnt how to stay committed. Additionally, I was able to present my artwork to others (e.g. in exhibitions), and this taught me how to accept criticisms; this helps me improve my art and become more open-minded.

In conclusion, I believe that hobbies are more than just entertainment. Artistic hobbies support our mental well-being, our ability to explore and express ourselves, and they develop our pre-existing skills too. By dedicating time to creative pursuits, I believe that individuals can gain benefits which will aid them in their future careers.

ITORS

THAI ANH HOANG Y12

BUI GIA KHANH PHAM Y12

THE PHUC MAI Y12

MR SIMON HOARE

IM Y9 [BACK COVER]

G Y9

S WRITERS

Y9 [FRONT COVER]

CHAEL) JUNG Y11

RINA) NGUYEN Y11

I Y12 N Y12

HOANG PHUONG CHI NGUYEN Y12