October 1998
SHWhyte Avenue
Commercial Area
SHIGH
and Planning Policy Changes
IZoning From Edmonton's
Land Use Bylaw K
GENERAL PURPOSE To allow a diverse range of commercial and service uses suited to the unique character of Old Strathcona,
with additional architectural and site controlsto ensure
compatibility and"
i consistency withthe area's development styles and heritage characteristics.
and use and development in the Whyte . Avenue CommercialArea is regulated by two unique zoning instruments: a
DEFINITIONS
Area Redevelopment Plan (ARP)
-Areablishel ment Pa(ARP) a
*sestablishes and describes a oprehesive set of nd 'set of land usle comprehenlsive poliieSas n established. poliies or communi-ty
,Direct Development Control (DC1):Zone * provides',a zone for detailed,' sensitive control of the use. developnient, siting and design of buildings where this is necessary to establish,preserveor enhance areas of unique characteras identified in J an ARP
Direct Development Control (DC1) zone, and a Statutory Plan Overlay (SPO) for the General Business (CB2) zone. Adopted on January.20, 1998, these new instruments are the result of a 2 V2 year .:planning study coordinated by the Old Strathcona Area Community Council (OSACC) '. .
BACKGROUND . The Whyte Avenue Land Use Planning Study was initiated on July 25, 1995, as a public and comprehensive review of the changing nature of the Whyte Avenue, Commercial Area. 'traditional
Statutory -Plan 'Overlay (SPO)
At the time, zoning and planning.policies
*providesa means to alter or specify regulations for uses in -order-to achieve the planning objectives of an ARP
were complex, inconsistent and sometimes conflicting. There were 10 commercial zones and numerous policies within 3 ARPs directing development within this area.
PLA N N
IN
G
AN D-.. DE V ELO PM ENT
Whyte Avenue featured a pattern of built form which reflected the area's tradition of pedestrian-oriented, small scale commercial outlets. , In addition, historically significant buildings were being rejuvenated and incorporated within the area's complex fabric. However, other changes were occurring which resulted in undesirable impacts upon surrounding businesses and residents. Large commercial outlets not typically found in the area, disruptions to the continuity of the pedestrian environment by vehicular access drives, parking lots and irregular setbacks for new buildings, and rapid growth of the entertainment sector were all contributing to the er6sion of the appearance and functidn"of the area, congestion, and social conflict. In .part, the Whyie"AVehue a Use Planning Study w ni titd t: 1 * retain the.' ui ce, s'mll town commercial style an"d 'ix Continuedon other side...
DEP ART M- E NT