The
Davidsonian
Independent Student Journalism Since 1914
inside
davidsonian.com
Stella Davis ‘26 examines declining student participation in SGA elections
Volume 122 Issue 13
February 21, 2024
2
Natalie Russell ‘25 reflects on her decision not to go abroad
4
Josie Swain ‘27 offers a lens into Erica Diamond’s quilting project and advocacy
6
The Yowl searches for more funny students, offers incentives for joining
8
Armfield Housing Violations Disrupt Social Life Students, Adminstration Clash Over Hosting Restrictions
STELLA MACKLER‘26 (SHE/HER) CO-EDITOR IN CHIEF
T
he Armfield apartments play a large role in the social scene on campus at Davidson. However, as the spring semester has begun, many of the students living in apartments that typically host open parties have been restricted from doing so as a consequence for violating Residence Life Policies. These restrictions have impacted student social life on campus.
to end on Feb. 16, was reached. “Nic Capano, area coordinator, we’ve had a great relationship with him,” Hilton said. “He’s been very open and honest with us. But now this, it seems like something somebody came in above him and kind of gave the directive. I think as a student obviously, there are rules in place to keep us safe and such. But, you know, this definitely, this behavior..it definitely tarnishes the trust there.” Travis Allen ‘24 also lives in an apartment that was subject to a week-long hosting freeze after
Armfield’s courtyard is one of two open consumption spaces. Photo by Davidson College. Armfield, also known as “F” among the student body, is one of two open consumption areas on campus for students over the age of 21. Its status as an open consumption area, along with first-floor residents who open their apartments on Friday and Saturday nights for open parties, makes it a distinct feature of Davidson’s social climate. The Residence Life Office (RLO) could not comment on how many students were subject to a hosting freeze, or for what reasons. The Davidsonian was able to get in touch with one group of students who are not allowed to host in their apartment until March 1. This group includes David Hilton ‘24 along with his four roommates. “I think it was the last weekend of January, the following week we received an email from the area coordinators saying like, ‘Hey, by the way, we have a couple of write ups or a couple of instances where reports [were submitted] to us on both Friday and Saturday [nights]. One of which was a noise complaint, one of which was over capacity,” Hilton said. The capacity limit as stated in RLO Policies and Procedures for students is 25 people in a Martin Court apartment, which includes Armfield. After receiving the email, Hilton and his roommates met with RLO to discuss potential consequences of their violating RLO policy, and it was during this meeting that a two week hosting freeze was suggested. When Hilton and his roommates received their official letter from RLO on their final punishments, however, they were informed that the hosting freeze would last until March 1. The roommates were unaware of how the decision to extend their restriction, originally supposed
a noise complaint was made during Placement Day. “Campo [campus police] came down, just kind of told us to turn off the music,” Allen said. “An RA [resident advisor] was with campo but he didn’t really talk to us a whole lot. Then we had our meeting with Nic Capano, we usually always have one if something goes wrong. He talked to us about what was going on and he told us we couldn’t open for the weekend.” When RLO makes decisions about housing violations, they view every Davidson student by the standards of the Code of Responsibility. “All students are under the code of rights and responsibilities. RLO policies are in effect, honor council-honor code is in effect,” said Assistant Dean of Students and Director of Residence Life Walter Snipes. “So when a student decides, or makes an action that conflicts with that, there are outcomes that occur. So it’s not about hey, there is a hosting freeze, it is that students have gone through a process and the outcome is what the outcome is, based on that process. It is important to separate individual students from the perception of an apartment.” Snipes was unable to comment on the specifics of which students are currently not allowed to host in their apartments or the reasons why. However, he emphasized that all students must be held accountable for their actions. “It is not about the apartment. It is about the individual students able to go through the process with the education outcome.” Nonetheless, many students are concerned about the effects of Armfield potentially ceasing to function as a social spot on campus. One worry among students is that going out will become more “cliquey,” as Gabe Jones ‘24
puts it. Jones lives in an apartment on the first floor of Armfield that occasionally serves as a “spillover spot” from other apartments. “If you want to have a good time, I would say that they [Armfield apartments] are the only things that fuel Davidson,” Jones said. “For example I feel like people at Davidson are kind of cliquey, a smaller school. So we have our own friend groups or whatever, but F is the only real spot where if you want to meet someone new or if you want to do something different, or see people that you wouldn’t normally hang
address it, we’re able to handle anything good or bad in our apartment. We can run up the hill and grab the police and run upstairs and grab an RA.” Snipes pointed out that students are subject to campus and federal policies, regardless of their personal views on campus social culture. “Sometimes the question comes up – if students can’t behave in a certain way that doesn’t violate policy, because that is what it comes down to, then they’re going to go elsewhere to violate policy,” Snipes said. “My
Students wait to be allowed into a crowded Armfield apartment. Photo by Maia Ferreyra out with in their apartments or their dorms, you go down to F, meet new people and try new things.” Dominick Schraeder ‘26 compared the party scene at Davidson to those at bigger, schools and emphasized its inclusive nature. “I think one of the biggest parts of why Davidson is so enjoyable at the social scene is because it’s so open, and it caters towards everyone,” Schraeder said. “You’re never gonna get shut out of an F apartment because you look a certain way, or you talk a certain way, or you dress a certain way, it’s never gonna - that’s never ever the reason. It’s always if people are not being let in, it’s almost exclusively because it’s a capacity issue and it’s a safety issue, rather than you just don’t look the way that people want you to look.” Armfield also functions as an after-party atmosphere, weekend quiet hours don’t start until 2 am. “It’s nice to be able to have something that you know, doesn’t close till two so you go to your parties till midnight and then kind of everybody can just collectively just go kind of have a good time,” Allen said. Armfield serves as a relatively safe option for going out, as students do not have to drive and campus police are stationed nearby. “The thing about F is it is a concentrated place with a police officer stationed up the hill that has, when things have gotten out of hand, has come in,” Hilton said. “In my experience interacting with campus police, they seem to enforce the rules for our safety’s sake, they seem to have our safety as number one priority. And having it concentrated there, it’s much more localized in our community, we’re able to
response to a student is I prefer for you not to violate policy. These are not arbitrary policies. You can’t, federally, you cannot drink under the age of 21. It’s not a Davidson wink wink nudge nudge. Federally you can’t do that. So why would we let you do that on campus?” Students fear social life will now be pushed off campus, further segmenting the community. “People who aren’t really in with the cliques lose their way to socialize and meet people,” Jones said. “For people who are in cliques and would be invited to these off campus events, now [they] either have to find a way to drive over there or walk in the night.” If going out becomes more concentrated away in apartments or houses off campus, Schraeder argues that the likelihood of drunk driving may also increase. “If people are going to go off campus, which I think they will, you know, that’s probably going to be more driving under the influence, because people want to party but they also need to get places that they can’t access by foot,” Schraeder said. “And I think it’s also a terrible thing, because people might start walking places and if they’re too intoxicated, they might not make it back or to where they’re trying to go.” Jones feels as though the college may be ignoring the realities of life as a college student. “You can look at it like, Oh, it’s just a bunch of people drinking, some of those people shouldn’t be drinking, but they’re gonna do that anyways,” Jones said. “You know, if someone wants to do something, they’re gonna find a way to do it, but giving them a safe environment to do it in I feel is .. the best case scenario.”