The
Davidsonian
Independent Student Journalism Since 1914
inside
davidsonian.news
Current Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson Proves Controversial in Gubernatorial Race
Volume 122, Issue 16
March 20, 2024
2
Anna Farmer ‘27 offers a little’s take on Big Little week and bonding traditions
4
Ryan Harris ‘26 sheds light on men’s basketball’s early loss in A10 tournament
5
Now that sports betting is legal, the Yowl suggests best bids on campus
8
Tensions Over Free Speech Increase On Campus
Davidson’s Connection to the Nationwide Debate Over Academic Freedom
T
JENNEVIEVE CULVER ‘25 (SHE/HER) STAFF WRITER
he role of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in academic institutions is a topic of much debate in the United States and permeates life at Davidson. According to the college website, the school commits to “understand[ing] that cultivating a broadly diverse community is crucial to our educational mission.” At first, one might assume the values of diversity, equity, and inclusion would be accepted as positives. However, alumni have called into question DEI efforts at Davidson, which they see as conflicting with the right to free speech. This controversy has been stirred up tenfold after the recent publication of an opinion piece in The Charlotte Observer by former Republican North Carolina governor and Davidson alum, Jim Martin ’57, entitled “DEI efforts at Davidson College go too far.” “Some progressive influencers now want students to learn and accept that they are either ‘oppressed’ or ‘oppressors,’ based on nothing but ‘the color of their skin,’” Martin wrote. He refers to these efforts as “Cynical Race Theory.” Former Governor Martin’s article was prompted by the mandatory viewing on February 4th of a film entitled “I’m Not Racist…Am I?” for all student-athletes. It was a controversial screening even among students, as many student-athletes chose not to attend. Multiple athletes declined to comment, both those who chose to attend and those who chose not to. “In [the film’s] lexicon, ‘racist’ is just a synonym for ‘white,’” Martin claimed in his article. He considers it to be an attempt to “indoctrinate America’s youth.” Another alumnus, Richard Tankard ’88, said his issue with the film was that it “purports that all white people are racist.” Aleia Gisolfi-McCready ’25 organized the screening. She is a member of the Women’s Soccer team and Women’s Track and Field team. She explained her actions were in response to prexisting issues. “There had been some issues with things being said that
As conversations around DEI at Davidson increase, tensions are ignited within the college community. Photo from Visit Lake Norman. should not have among teammates and I believed this film would benefit the athletic department as a whole and spark much needed conversation,” she said. In Gisolfi-McCready’s eyes, the event was a success.“Not everyone agreed on all aspects of the film which I think is okay. It sparked what I was aiming for: conversation,” she said. Assistant Professor of Communications Dr. Isaac Bailey ‘95 supports Gisolfi-McCready’s efforts and the screening of the film. He also pushed back against DFTD’s arguments and suggested that the screening presented a learning opportunity
even for students who disagreed with the film. “[She] saw a problem and stepped up to try and provide a solution, precisely the kind of action we want Davidson students to take,” Bailey said. “That it discomforted some student-athletes is not a sign that something bad happened. This is Davidson. Students are supposed to be challenged and think beyond themselves.” Gisolfi-McCready echoed Bailey’s claims about the importance of DEI. Unlike Former Governor Martin, she feels that DEI expands students’ worldviews rather than pushing a singular perspective. “It is imperative to create a space where everyone feels respected,” she said. “I don’t believe DEI is an indoctrination in any way. If anything it is continuing education.” Former Governor Martin connected the film screening to the Davidsonians for Freedom of Thought and Discourse (DFTD), a voluntary alumni nonprofit unaffiliated with the college. According to Executive Director Kevin Cook ’09, the group is “primarily focused on working with students and faculty to enhance and support free speech culture on campus.” In addition to his academic role, Bailey was the former head of the committee to craft the college’s statement of Commitment to Freedom of Expression. Former President Quillen created this committee to solidify the school’s support of free speech, expression, and academic freedom. Bailey opposes DFTD’s opinions and emphasizes that DEI practices play a key role in the Davidson community and could improve the college’s future. “[It is] extremely important that Davidson continues to commit to DEI as we try to diversify in a diversifying nation,” Bailey said. Without it, “we won’t be able to create the best environment for academic excellence or prepare our students for the world that’s emerging rather than the one we are leaving behind.” Bailey also noted that his research conflicts with DFTD’s findings.
CONTINUED ON PAGE 2
NC Voters Go “Uncommitted” In Democratic Primary
AIDAN MARKS ‘27 (HE/HIM) POLITICS EDITOR
N
orth Carolinians took to the polls to cast their ballot in state primary elections on March 5. In the largest story of the night, according to the North Carolina State Board of Elections, almost 13% of voters in the Democratic presidential primary voted “No Preference,” a sharp rebuke of President Joe Biden, the only candidate on the ballot. There are various reasons for the protest vote in North Carolina. The New York Times highlighted the large population of older voters who registered as Democrats but now vote Republican in presidential elections. Another possibility, and one more tied to young voters at Davidson, is the nationwide call from progressive leaders for voters to cast “uncommitted” ballots in state Democratic primaries, demanding the Biden administration call for a permanent ceasefire to the conflict in Gaza. The movement has found the most success in Michigan and Minnesota, with 101,000 (13%) and 46,000 (19%) uncommitted ballots cast, respectively. The movement caught the attention of Quinn Dunlap ‘24, President of
Davidson College Democrats. After conferring with the club’s executive board, DC Dems decided to pick a side. “During the primary election we encouraged people to vote for no preference. We posted that on our Instagram and we were encouraging a lot of people to do it. My only regret is that we didn’t do it sooner,” Dunlap said. Voting no preference has become a rallying point for progressives, primarily in response to the Biden administration’s handling of the ongoing crisis in Gaza. “People as a way of protesting would vote uncommitted to get his attention and to show how many Democratic voters are really upset with how he’s been handling it,” Dunlap said. Though voting no preference has no effect on whether Biden becomes the Democratic nominee for President, it still carries symbolic importance. “This was an effort to be like: we have the power to go in, put in the effort, actually show up, be politically engaged to say, I know you’re going to win this thing but you don’t have my support until you do something for me as your constituent. So it’s really a way to make one’s vote count,” said Assistant Professor of Sociology Aarushi Bhandari. In addition to rebuking Biden’s policy, voting no preference offers the administration time to
change course, a step many see as essential to securing their vote in the general election. “I would hope that the Biden administration would see the large national protests and the amount of rhetoric on social media as clear enough signs that...there are large sections of people who voted for him in 2020 who are very unhappy with him at the moment,” said Elias Henderson ‘24, who is Palestinian and Co-President of the Middle East and North African Students Association. . “There’s a large section of the vote in the middle that is just happy to see any action at all…a temporary ceasefire is not the solution I want, but it’s way more likely to get me to vote for Biden.” Across North Carolina, about 89,000 people voted no preference. About 8,000 of those votes came from Mecklenburg County. To Bhandari, these numbers indicate a clear success. “These are way larger uncommitted numbers than the last two Democratic primaries for president,” Bhandari said. “So they are big numbers, especially because Biden is running unopposed in an election where Democrats already hold office. So the expectation is that he just sweeps these nominations. The fact that people were able to mobilize so many people so quickly to show up to the ballot boxes and
give this protest vote is really a testament to how successful grassroots social movements can be, even local communities like ours.” Dunlap emphasizes that voting no preference is about more than expressing discontent with the Biden administration. “[Voting no preference] means that we can [create change]...It means that we are moving more and more towards a system that works for everybody…I think we should have a positive outlook on how this has gone because it means that we’re going to keep making our voices heard.”. Voters have made their voices heard. Now, Henderson believes it is time for legislators to listen. “If Democrats want to win this upcoming election, it’s important for them to get in touch with grassroots organizers. Let them explain themselves and simply enact some sort of policy that is attempting to help.” Ultimately, Henderson emphasizes that the ball is in the Biden administration’s court. “This uncommitted vote can go two ways. They can either take the sign that they were very clearly given, show a willingness to listen and adopt and move forward, or they can attempt to ignore it, alienate those people from their base, and then they will be circumvented and replaced.”