Our approach We devised a two-phased approach whereby our ultimate goal is to transform the first 700 metres of the street into a pedestrian-friendly site. We believe this can be achieved within a 2-3 year timeframe. The first phase entails a period of experimentation through the use of placemaking activities. The rationale for such experimentation is that it provides for an opportunity to learn and see what works and what does not. In a public space, it is also valuable to see how local business owners and citizens respond to such changes. Since the local business owners explicitly expressed their concern over the proposed expansion of the sidewalks and reduction of the existing parking bays, a temporary approach which tests the concept, could prove useful. It not only allows for testing of ideas but also allows for the authorities to prove to the business owners that business activity and foot traffic will not decrease. Among the experiments we propose are: • An open street day, • A market day, • Parklets. • Introducing decorative elements above eye level, • Creating a street art gallery, • Introducing mobile plants. The introduction of a weekly open street day is inspired by what we experienced in Jakarta. Closing the street to car traffic on a regular basis can test how the street would function without motor traffic and showcase the different functionalities to local stakeholders. Second, a market day follows the same logic, but with a specific focus of targeting economic activities. Third, parklets explicitly blocks existing parking spaces and opening it up to new and temporary activities. This 16 6
concept is powerful as it directly challenges the car-centric mindset and provides an opportunity to demonstrate that reduced parking does not necessarily equate to reduced business. Fourth, the introduction of decorative elements above eye level allows for a space to be more engaging and encourages visitors to stay longer. Fifth, the Suryakencana street is accessible by several alleyways which are being underutilised. Finally, the introduction of mobile plants is useful in expanding green space element, which seems to defines Bogor as a city. This type of intervention can also showcase the effect of reducing parking spaces. We believe that phase one should conclude after one to two years. The second phase of the project will focus on spatial and policy changes for the area. By incorporating the lessons from the experiments in phase one, the government should be ready in making informed spatial changes. Our team further propose the introduction of a tree lane on either side of the street for water retention purposes. Also, the widened of sidewalks as well as a walking lane in the centre of the road, and the introduction of urban furniture, lighting, and canopies to protect people from the heavy rain. To compliment the mayor’s effort in making the city more physically active, we also suggest a dedicated jogging ring around the botanical garden and to pilot a two-directional bike lane on the street. Such procedures also allow for all relevant stakeholders to have the opportunity to provide input and directly shape any proposed changes. We believe this is the key strength of temporary placemaking activities. This can enhance the democratic process of the proposed spatial interventions, and provide for a neighbourhood revitalisation strategy, which can be applied at a broader scale throughout the city of Bogor.
I S O C A R P Y P P W o r k s h o p , J a k a r t a & B o g o r 2 0 19