Stem cell poster 12

Page 1

Bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass by co-fermentation using Zymomonas mobilis and Pichia stipitis on bioreactor #

Kartik Gehlot and Sanjoy Ghosh*

Biochemical Engineering Lab, Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India # Presenting Author: gehlot.kartik67@gmail.com *Corresponding email: ghoshfbs@iitr.ac.in

RESULTS & DISCUSSION

INTRODUCTION 

Bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass is most popular and promising technology nowadays to reduce pollution (Fu et al., 2009).

Kans Grass Biomass contain up to 60% fermentable sugars in the form of

glucose

and xylose that can be converted to bioethanol (Zabed et al., 2016).  Kans

Grass Biomass can be hydrolyzed by acid hydrolysis process into glucose rich

fraction (GRF) and xylose rich fraction (XRF) (Chaudhary et al., 2014).  Glucose

fermentation is mainly performed by using bacteria (Zymomonas mobilis)

organisms with addition of nutrients just before P.stipitis inoculation at 14th hour of fermentation (Liu et al., 2018).  The

Batch

Step feed 1

Step feed 2

Step feed 3

Overall

60

60

60

60

240

Initial Xylose (g/l)

26.03

45.26

73.38

101.87

101.87

Max. Ethanol Conc. (g/l)

Max. Biomass Conc. (g/l)

2.52

2.81

3.07

3.74

3.74

Fermentation Time (h)

6

4

5

24

39

Glucose Consumption (%) Ethanol Yield Coefficient Yp/s (g/g) Biomass Yield Coefficient Yx/s (g cells/g substrate) Max. Ethanol Productivity rp (g/l/h) Max. Biomass productivity rx, (g cells/g/h)

96%

92%

95%

61.6%

86.15%

0.433

0.32

0.468

0.47

0.424

0.042

0.004

0.004

0.011

0.015

4.33

4.80

5.622

1.18

2.61

0.42

0.07

0.052

0.028

0.095

Max. Ethanol Conc. (g/l)

present study, we studied the co--fermentation of glucose and xylose using above

above study resulted in complete utilization of both the sugars with

ethanol yield of 0.46g/g and ethanol productivity of 1.56 g/l/h on synthetic media

Table 5: Kinetic parameters of Fed-Batch process of P.stipitis

Table 4: Kinetic parameters of Fed-Batch process of Z.mobilis

Initial Glucose (g/l)

and xylose fermentation is mainly done by yeast (Pichia stipitis).  In

Fig.7: Fed-batch process of P.stipitis on synthetic media with xylose on 7L bioreactor

Fig.6: Fed-Batch process of Z.mobilis on synthetic media with glucose on 7L bioreactor

METHODS

Batch

Step feed 1

Step feed 2

Overall

60

60

60

180

13.32

26.23

40.32

39.65

Max. Biomass Conc. (g/l)

31.25

45.26

46.81

46.13

Fermentation Time (h)

13

17

24

58

Xylose Consumption (%) Ethanol Yield Coefficient Yp/s (g/ g) Biomass Yield Coefficient Yx/s (g cells/g substrate) Max. Ethanol Productivity rp (g/ l/h) Max. Biomass productivity rx (g cells/g/h)

53.33%

43.33%

60%

81.11%

0.22

0.21

0.23

0.22

0.52

0.23

0.02

0.25

1.02

0.75

0.58

0.68

2.4

0.82

0.06

0.79

Table 6: Kinetic parameters of co-fermentation of sugars with Z.mobilis and P.stiptis on synthetic media at different RPM for P.stipitis

Parameters

400 rpm for P.stipitis

200 rpm for P.stipitis

Initial Glucose + Xylose (g/l)

60 + 40

60 + 40

Max. Ethanol conc. (g/l)

46.84

Max. Biomass Conc. (g/l)

1.31 (ZM) + 29.31 (PS)

1.22 (ZM) + 27.22 (PS)

Fermentation Time (h)

30

60

Sugar Consumption (Glucose + Xylose) (%)

100% + 100%

Ethanol Yield Coefficient Yp/s (g/g) Biomass Yield Coefficient Yx/s (g cells/g substrate) Max. Ethanol Productivity rp (g/l/h) Max. Biomass productivity rx (g cells/g/h)

0.468 (91.66%) 0.021 (ZM) + 0.732 (PS) 1.56 0.043 (ZM) + 0.0.977 (PS)

300C Fig.8: Co-fermentation of Glucose & Xylose by Z.mobilis & P.stipitis in 7L Bioreactor without distillation

23.666

100% + 100% 0.394 0.0385 0.394 0.0385

Table 7: Kinetic parameters of co-fermentation of Glucose & Xylose by Z.mobilis & P.stipitis on 7L Bioreactor with distillation and multi-step addition of xylose Fig.9: Co-fermentation of Glucose & Xylose by Z.mobilis & P.stipitis on 7L Bioreactor with distillation

Glucose

Initial Sugar (g/l)

Table 1: Chemical composition of various non-edible lignocellulosic biomass Major Components

Kans Grass (%)

Cellulose

44.0

Hemicellulose

Baggasse (%)

39.2

21.5

Acid Soluble Lignin

Wheat Straw (%)

37.8

25.4

26.37

40

40

40

180

28.78

18.87

17.97

3.02

68.64

Max. Biomass Conc. (g/l)

1.31

34.1

8.206

1.13

1.31 (ZM) + 41.14 (PS)

Fermentation Time (h)

14

20

18

20

72

Sugar Consumption (%)

100%

88.34%

91.7%

21.97%

82.66%

Ethanol Yield Coefficient Yp/s (g/g)

0.479 (93.8%)

0.471 (92.17%)

0.449 (87.86%)

0.075 (14.77%)

0.38 (74.62%)

Biomass Yield Coefficient Yx/s (g cells/g substrate)

0.021

0.852

0.205

0.0755

0.021 (ZM) + 0.344 (PS)

Max. Ethanol Productivity rp (g/l/h)

2.05

0.943

0.998

0.151

0.953

Max. Biomass productivity rx (g cells/g/h)

0.093

1.705

0.455

0.056

0.093 (ZM) + 0.709 (PS)

20.08

Acid Insoluble Lignin

2.12

1.4

1.1

Ash Content

3.35

6.5

4.3

Parameters

200 RPM

400 RPM

600 RPM

Initial Xylose (g/l) Max. Ethanol conc. (g/l) Max. Biomass Conc. (g/l) Fermentation Time (h) Xylose Consumption (%) Ethanol Yield Coefficient Yp/s (g/g) (% theoretical yield) Biomass Yield Coefficient Yx/s (g cells/g substrate) Max. Ethanol Productivity rp (g/l/h)

60 27.8 10.07 48 100 0.46 (90 %)

60 28.96 32.9 18 100 0.48 (94.1 %)

60 29.07 36.67 18 100 0.48 (94.1%)

0.16

0.54

0.611

0.58

1.6

1.61

Max. Biomass productivity rx

0.21

1.82

2.03

Table 8: Literature review of fermentation of sugars with Z.mobilis and P.stiptis on synthetic media and hydrolysate

26.3

21.2

Table 2: Mass Transfer studies on P.stipitis on 7L bioreactor with synthetic media

Fig.10: Co-fermentation of Glucose & Xylose by Z.mobilis & P.stipitis on 7L Bioreactor with distillation and multi-step addition of xylose

Table 3: Mass Transfer studies on P.stiptis on 7L bioreactor with hydrolysate Parameters

200 RPM

400 RPM

600 RPM

Initial Xylose (g/l) Max. Ethanol conc. (g/l) Max. Biomass Conc. (g/l) Fermentation Time (h) Xylose Consumption (%)

60 27.10 10.79 48 100

60 27.65 30.65 18 100

60 28.16 35.65 18 100

Ethanol Yield Coefficient Yp (g/g) (% theoretical yield)

0.45 (88.23%)

0.46 (90.2%)

0.47 (92.1%)

0.18

0.51

0.594

0.564

1.53

1.56

0.22

1.7

1.98

Biomass Yield Coefficient Yx/s (g cells/g substrate) Max. Ethanol Productivity rp (g/l/h) Max. Biomass productivity rx (g cells/g/h)

Overall

60

Max. Ethanol Conc. (g/l)

Fig.1: Overview of Bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass (Ref.: http://www.deinove.com/en/programmes-applications/deinol)

Xylose Step feed Step feed 1 2

Combination of micro-organisms

Media

Initial Glucose (g/l)

Initial Xylose ( g/l)

Max. Ethanol Conc. (g/l)

Max. Ethanol Yield (g/g)

Max. Ethanol productivity (g/l/h)

Reference

Zymomonas mobilis + Pichia Stipitis

Synthetic

30

20

-

0.49

1.277

Fu et al., 2009

Zymomonas mobilis + Pichia Stipitis

Synthetic

300

100

56.9

0.469

1.016

Singh et al., 2014

Zymomonas mobilis + Pichia Stipitis

Hydrolysate

200

60

62.3

0.474

1.416

Singh et al., 2014

Zymomonas mobilis + Pichia Stipitis

Synthetic

60

40

46.84

0.468

1.56

Present Study

CONCLUSIONS  Z.mobilis and P.stipitis have considerable potential for large-scale ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysate because of high ethanol productivity.

 The combination of above organisms are efficient in utilizing both glucose and xylose from synthetic media as well as natural hydrolysate.

 In the present study, co-fermentation of glucose and xylose was performed on 7L NBS Bioreactor with 2L working volume that resulted in ethanol yield of 0.46 g/g and ethanol productivity of 1.56 g/l/h.

 Addition of nutrients together with distillation after glucose fermentation with Z.mobilis resulted in enhanced ethanol productivity by P.stipitis in co-fermentation of glucose and xylose in synthetic media. REFERENCES

Fig.1: Batch process of P.stipitis on 7L bioreactor at 200 RPM with synthetic media

Fig.2: Batch process of P.stipitis on 7L bioreactor at 400 RPM with synthetic media

Fig.4: Batch process of P.stipitis on 7L bioreactor at 200 RPM with hydrolysate

Fig.5: Batch process of P.stipitis on 7L bioreactor at 400 RPM with hydrolysate

- Nan Fu, Paul Peiris, Julie Markham, John Bavor (2009). “A novel co-culture process with Zymomonas mobilis and Pichia stipitis for efficient ethanol production on glucose/xylose mixtures”. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 45, 210–217. -Yanli Chen (2010). “Development and application of co-culture for ethanol production by co-fermentation of glucose and xylose: a systematic review”. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol, 38, 581–597 -Lalit K. Singh, Chandrajit B. Majumderb, Sanjoy Ghosh (2014). “Development of sequential-co-culture system (Pichia stipitis and Zymomonas mobilis) for bioethanol production from Kans grass biomass”. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 82, 150– 157 - Zabed et al. (2016). “Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: An overview on feedstocks and technological approaches.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 66, 751-774.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors are thankful to the financial assistance provided by Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee and MHRD for carrying out this research work. Fig.3: Batch process of P.stipitis on 7L bioreactor at 600 RPM with synthetic media

Fig.6: Batch process of P.stipitis on 7L bioreactor at 600 RPM with hydrolysate

Biochemical Engineering Lab Raikamal Bhattacharya, Sharath, Pritam Singh, Vasundhra Jain, Rohith, Sharika, Abhinav Jain, Pratibha, Rajshree, Preeti, Rashmi, Somesh Bhambi


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.